The problem I've found with AutoQoS is that you often have to go back and
change something at some point. You could waste valuable time looking
through a Cisco-generated QoS configuration trying to figure out what needs
tweaking. Using MQC is my preferred method.
-Original Message-
From:
?
Regards,
Mark
From: Erik Goppel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 7:15 AM
To: Mark Holloway
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
Mark,
Once you install in Vmware, you automatically are licensed for demo
04, 2008 2:35 PM
To: Mike O
Cc: Mark Holloway; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
Mark,
if you install it in vmware, yes you have the licenses straight away, you
don`t need to install a license. the same goes for cups, regarding unity
Congratulations Ricardo! That is awesome!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Arevalo
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:49 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally i got it! CCIE # 22885
After almost one year of hard
) [mailto:ch...@kagadis.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 12:27 PM
To: Mark Holloway
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE VOICE HARDWARE
All,
Just a quick update. A while ago I mentioned in this thread that
CUCM/CUC/CUPS/CUCCX 7 could not be installed
http://www.markholloway.com/blog
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Koen Pintens
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 7:14 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UC 7 and UCM 7 Business edition
Does the CCIE Voice have open ended questions like the RS lab? Seems like
a real stickler for some folks.
I used the disc labeled HP 78xx-H1/H2 2003.1.3a and it worked fine in
VMWare.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 2:32 PM
To: Chris Parker
Cc:
I'm hoping someone can chime in and help out. I'm trying to setup a 3725 as
a PSTN switch. My VWIC-2MFT-T1 comes up fine but I'm having difficulty with
the VWIC-1MFT-E1. With IPVOICE-12.4.18T the router sees the E1 module but
displays CONTROLLER E1 firmware not running so I tried 12.4.23
- FPGA Firmware Download
I'm not sure what the above error means, but it's strange that the
VWIC-1MFT-E1 works find in the 2811 but not the 3725.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Saturday
To: Mark Holloway; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725 w/VWIC-1MFT-E1 trouble
sounds like either (1) incompatible card (check the release notes) or (2)
bad card.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Holloway mailto:m...@markholloway.com
To: 'Mark Holloway
.
From: Mike O [mailto:mik...@msn.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 2:12 PM
To: Mark Holloway; 'Cliff McGlamry'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725 w/VWIC-1MFT-E1 trouble
Mark,
Are you using the E1 for voice or data? if voice which NM are you using?
-Mike
ISR laying around that I typically use for lab testing with Broadworks, but
I'm going to make it the PSTN switch for my CCIE lab. Thanks for the
replies.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Saturday, March
!
From: Mark Holloway [mailto:m...@markholloway.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 2:55 PM
To: 'Mark Holloway'; 'Mike O'; 'Cliff McGlamry';
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3725 w/VWIC-1MFT-E1 trouble
I've opted to use a 2811 as my PSTN switch instead so I don't
Differences Between the AIM-CUE and the NM-CUE and NME-CUE Modules
Cisco Unity Express is supported on the advanced integration module
(AIM-CUE), the network module and extended capacity network module (NM-CUE
and NM-CUE-EC), and the enhanced network module (NME-CUE). Cisco Unity
Express
:27 AM
To: Mark Holloway; 'Ccie Voice Online'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3.0 PVDM-2 resources
It depends on your application and your understanding of the constrains you
will be facing...
PVDM2-16 contains only 1 DSP and as you might have known, you cannot do both
conferencing
Sorry, April 30th. :)
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:03 PM
To: 'Larry Hadrava'; seanbda...@mavetech.com
Cc: 'OSL Group'; 'Frank Gusky'; 'Vik Malhi'; 'Cisco certification
Brian,
Is the written exam still focused on 4.x?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Valentine
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:54 PM
To: Wayne Lawson
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
Is there any pending Voice V3 training material or have all the updates been
released?
On 5/7/09 7:43 AM, Wayne Lawson groupst...@ipexpert.com wrote:
There are 5 technology-focused labs -and an additional 5 troubleshooting land
for those technology. Each section contains 2 labs.
Regards,
. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
Is there any pending Voice V3 training material or have all the updates been
released?
On 5/7/09 7:43 AM, Wayne Lawson groupst...@ipexpert.com
I haven't moved forward with any purchases yet. I am planning to do so very
soon which is why I was asking. Thanks for the info though.
On 5/7/09 4:51 PM, J Hogan j.jho...@gmail.com wrote:
If you just purchased then you should have volume 1 lab for v 3,0
On 5/6/09, GRAFL Philipp
Sorry, I just realized this wasn't directed to me. LOL..long day ;)
On 5/7/09 4:51 PM, J Hogan j.jho...@gmail.com wrote:
If you just purchased then you should have volume 1 lab for v 3,0
On 5/6/09, GRAFL Philipp philipp.gr...@nextiraone.at wrote:
Hello everybody!
I am preparing for
The question is what is a CCIE, thematically?
Is the CCIE an expert at configuration, troubleshooting, design?
Potentially Cisco could have designed the new CCIE Voice blueprint in the
same manner they designed the new R/S 4.0 blueprint where both configuration
and troubleshooting are tested
Jason,
Check out Deploying Unified Presence by HouTong Luo. It is a great book
that is very hands-on - like a workbook.
http://www.amazon.com/Deploying-Cisco-Unified-Presence-HouTong/dp/0557039533
On 5/17/09 8:55 PM, Jason Granat j...@slash128.com wrote:
Nothing is really 'wrong' with
I have five 7961 phones and a four 7941 phones in my lab. Is there anything
deeming in the workbooks that would require me to have all six-line phones
or is it ok to have a mix? I didn¹t see anything in the lab topology that
indicates the specific models of phones.
Thanks,
Mark
I blogged about it.
http://www.markholloway.com/blog
On 5/22/09 8:22 PM, SYED HUSSAIN sheeraz.huss...@rogers.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install CUCM 7 in vmware, during installation it gives an error
message regarding Drive: none...and abort the installation. I am using 80GB in
Does anyone know if the CCIE Voice Written is getting an overhaul with
the launch of the V3 lab?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
I am currently using VMWare Workstation to run all the UC
applications. Someone mentioned to me that using ESXi, which is a
true hyper visor, will increase the performance of any VM when
compared to Workstation. For the most part UCM runs fine with
Workstation but I do agree that
ZTerm is a free terminal program that works really well too.
On Aug 1, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Tanner Ezell wrote:
OS X has a built in TFTP server, and there is a GUI available for it
that is simple to use (google os x tftp server).
Visio - OmniGraffle is the closest competitor, otherwise, use
Is there a significant performance difference between VMWare
Workstation 6.x on Linux (CentOS? Mint?) compared to Workstation on
Vista x64? I know ESXi provides a speed bump over Vista, but I have
other VM's I am running with Workstation and prefer not to derail.
Thanks,
Mark
.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway [...@markholloway.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:37 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMWare on Linux vs. Windows Vista x64
Does IOS 12.4.24(T) require a license key to use CUBE? I haven't
upgraded my routers yet but I remember seeing someone mention it..
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
I wouldn't expect to see ;tag=16D73F4-12C4 for a notify message
because there is no prior dialog.
On Aug 11, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
Getting a 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
All the doco I have says that I am missing an MWI command on the FXS
port... but you
Is anyone using 8GB of memory to run Pub, Sub, Connections, UCCX, and
CUPS? Is it usable without being too bogged down?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
I think Vik mentioned once before you can provision/assign the HD
codec to 7941/7961 phones but you can't answer the call unless you
have the newer handset. I wonder if answering on speaker phone would
work?
I've seen the 7962 as low as $209, 7942 for $162, 7961 for $140, 7941
for $119
.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Ravindra Lakpriya
lakpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes you can but i prefer distributing the load among multiple servers.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Tanner Ezell
tanner.ez...@gmail.com wrote:
You can..pushing it though
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Mark
...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:45 PM
To: Mark Holloway
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Required quantity of Gen 2 phones
I wouldn't worry about the G722 codec. I would just focus on 7961
phones for Globalization support among other
: Mark Holloway [mailto:m...@markholloway.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:51 PM
To: Brian Valentine
Cc: 'Mark Snow'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Required quantity of Gen 2 phones
The handset that comes with it doesn't support wideband and
therefore you
iperf
On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:54 AM, d...@bestoftnt.com wrote:
Thanks JC. One question, how do I load the link with 'psuedo-random'
mixed
traffic?
DEC
The one that is the most free is usually the best one...
Do a show policy-map inteface... if you don't see packet matches,
then
your
, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com
wrote:
That looks really gray to me...
J
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
wrote:
http://www.costcentral.com/proddetail/Cisco_IP_Phone_7961G/CP7961GRF/1036946
7/
These guys seem to have great
You're nuts! ;)
I don't think they can change the content on such short notice and
AFAIK nothing new has been announced. If people have a date booked on
October 20th and are tested on material which is not in the current
blue print they would be pretty p**sed off. I know I would be! Argh!
ZERO. root is disabled and when you SSH to the appliance you are only
presented with a Cisco specific menu tree.
I also work with Broadsoft's Broadworks SIP server and it's a
nightmare compared to CCM. Very do it yourself - makes CCM look
like peanuts..
On Sep 23, 2009, at 6:11 AM,
I haven't looked, but is globalization in the labs required for the
CME phones or just UCM7 phones? I have 7961's for CME and HQ/BR1 has
7962 phones
On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Mark Snow wrote:
Neither CIPC, IPBlue (even as a 7961), nor any Gen 2 or older phone
(7960, 7940, etc) support
I agree with Atlanta. There are barely over 1,000 CCIE Voice folks
out there. We don't want it to climb too high, too fast. I say -
embrace the challenge.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote:
Atlanta, I like your enthusiasm :)
-Original Message-
From:
On Oct 29, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
I understand all that... I am just curious how many are passing the
new test... is it just a few, is it a lot?
J
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Mark Holloway
m...@markholloway.com wrote:
I agree with Atlanta. There are barely over
://www.networkworld.com/community/node/46893
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 30 October 2009 3:37 PM
To: Mark Holloway
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccie voice stats
I understand all that... I am just curious
Looking at the authors previous updates and summarizing the posted
stats he obtained from Cisco.
CCIE Voice Experts
-
May 18th - 975
June 26th - 1,039
September 24th - 1,077
October 26th - 1,082
On Oct 29, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
September
The feedback I have received from folks is the SRND guide is the go-to
study document for Open Ended Questions.
On Nov 7, 2009, at 4:47 PM, sean hurricane wrote:
In preparation for the lab i have resorted to spending weekends with
a gallon of coffee and SRND..humor aside i have been
Are you using the Loopback 0 ip address as the Device Name for the H323 gateway
in UCM? Do you have 'h323-gateway voip interface' and 'h323-gateway voip bind
srcaddr x.x.x.x' on the router's Loopback 0 interface so packets are sources
from Loopback 0?
On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:46 PM, sean
8, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
Are you using the Loopback 0 ip address as the Device Name for the H323
gateway in UCM? Do you have 'h323-gateway voip interface' and 'h323-gateway
voip bind srcaddr x.x.x.x' on the router's Loopback 0 interface so packets
One of the first things Vik discusses on Video #1 from Volume 1 is this
specific VMWare-related problem. I think he sums it up in a couple of seconds
by saying 'There isn't a whole lot we can do, so what we are going to do is
turn off CDP on that port.' I think that sums it up pretty good.
I totally agree and I'm glad you are seeing it that way. Let us know you're
outcome.
On Apr 8, 2010, at 1:30 PM, sean hurricane wrote:
Mark,
this is just to proof a point, but in a bind it's something to have in
your back pocket.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Mark Holloway
Just a couple of other things to verify.
Application Deskphone Control Settings and set the CtiGw password and enter
the PUB/SUB IP addresses
Application Deskphone Control User Assignment and Enable Deskphone Control
User Management End User and verify the expected extension shows up
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/integration/unity_connect/configuration/guide/unityconn_cme-as-srst.pdf
On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Arun Kumar wrote:
URL is not valid.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Berry ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Excellent document
I am working on Vol.1, Lab 2A, and it says I should refer to the document
Volume_1_All_Labs_Tables.pdf file for DN assignment. This document doesn't
exist in my members area. Should I be referring to something else?
___
For more information
Anyone have any luck getting MWI to work when CUE is integrated with CCM?
According to Cisco's documentation you do not need MWI numbers when JTAPI is
used. Voicemail is working as expected but I cannot get MWI to light up on the
phones using that are using the UCM Voicemail Profile I have
Amy and Jeff helped me with this the other day. Here is what I was missing
(from Jeff's reply)
max-ephones 1
max-dn 1
ip source ip address of voice vlan/loop
Also, under global config add the following command:
ccm-manager music-on-hold bind source ip address configured under
Is your Site B router MGCP or H323? With an H323 gateway I could get the
router to stream the local piano music while the MoH server is set to one hop
in UCM. With an MGCP gateway I couldn't get this to work and it always streams
from UCM unless the router is in SRST mode then it plays piano
If calls should complete using G.729 from HQ/BR1 to CUE on BR2 which is G.711u,
can the transcoding be configured on the BR2 router locally or does it need to
happen via the originating party's transcoding resources in UCM?
___
For more information
Codec : g729abr8, Maximum Packetization Period : 60
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Graham Hopkins wrote:
You'll need to do it at BR2 - if you do it at HQ/BR1 it will be G.711 across
the WAN.
Graham
On 6 Jul 2010, at 17:41, Mark Holloway wrote:
If calls should complete using
the default which is g729.
Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer
mjbe...@kroll.com
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:44
fully
I can see the dspfarm profile has registered so just taking a guess really.
However did this myself this afternoon - had some dtmf-relay issues but
transcoder was ok - post the whole config if you like.
Graham
On 6 Jul 2010, at 18:43, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote
When tasked with setting the call type to unknown, subscriber, national, or
international, are you guys also setting the plan to isdn or are you just
specifying the type and leaving the plan as unknown even though all the pstn
access is isdn?
___
.
Matthew Berry, CCVP, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer
mjbe...@kroll.com
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 1:40 PM
To: OSL osl
Subject: [OSL
If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x
command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as
PUB) to get its time from the HQ router, do I also need to configure the HQ
router with ntp server stratum X or can UCM simply get the time sync
Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
If a router (for example, HQ) is configured with the ntp server x.x.x.x
command to sync time from another source, but I want another device (such as
PUB) to get its time from the HQ
Cool, thanks Graham and Randall.
On Jul 8, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote:
Default stratum is 8 so a simple ntp master will work
Graham
On 8 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
Yikes, I meant ntp master stratum X not ntp server stratum X
On Jul 8
...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 1:40 PM
To: OSL osl
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] isdn plan
When tasked with setting the call type to unknown, subscriber, national, or
international, are you guys also setting
You can have a data T1 and a PRI T1, or a data E1 and a PRI E1, but you can't
split T1/E1 across the same card.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Kevin Damisch wrote:
I’ve seen this question before but can’t find it. On a VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1
card, can you configure or are there issues with having
Sounds like you have the PSTN to CUCM part working ok.
This is what I have been doing.
On the H323 router create the following dial-peer
dial-peer voice 10 pots
destination-pattern [2-9]..$
port 0/0/0:23
On CUCM have a Route Pattern that handles \+1414.[2-9]XX for calls
originated
I'm attempting to police VoIP signaling on Fast1/0/1 of a 3750 switch that is
configured as a trunk port connecting to the HQ router. I can't apply the
service-policy in the output direction. Am I thinking about this the wrong way
because I can apply it in the inbound direction.
# show run
I'm not quite sure what's causing this issue, but when any PSTN number calls
Br2Ph1 or Br2Ph2 I can see the Calling party information fine in the ISDN setup
and on the display of the phones, but if I let it go to voicemail and then
check messages from the phones after MWI lights up, CUE always
Thanks. In the GUI it's under Voicemail VM Configuration Play Caller ID for
External Callers = YES
On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:52 PM, Graham Hopkins wrote:
Add the line
voicemail callerid
not sure where it is in the GUI - must check
Graham
On 12 Jul 2010, at 06:42, Mark Holloway m
, but this 9 will still show up on the phone unless you use
voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
Regards
Graham Hopkins
On 9 Jul 2010, at 19:21, Mark Holloway wrote:
Sounds like you have the PSTN to CUCM part working ok.
This is what I have been
voice service voip
no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
Regards
Graham Hopkins
On 9 Jul 2010, at 19:21, Mark Holloway wrote:
Sounds like you have the PSTN to CUCM part working ok.
This is what I have been doing.
On the H323 router create the following dial
of no
supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update - or any other way of
preventing the 9 appearing on the phone display.
Regards
Graham
On 13 Jul 2010, at 03:53, Mark Holloway wrote:
Ok, so this is how set my H.323 gateway to operate. For example, a single
POTS dial peer
So, I have two phones Br1Ph1 and Br1Ph2 sharing the same DN. Both have the
same softkey template I created called Standard User-CBarge which includes
Remote in Use - CBarge. Both phones are in Device Pool BR1 which includes the
BR1_MRGL which has MRG_BR1_HW_CONF assigned. This MRG contains
to an MRGL that
is assigned to DP_BR1. When I configured my dspfarm profile on BR1 the max
sessions I could configure is 2. I believe that should still be adequate.
On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:12 PM, ccieid1ot wrote:
Set privacy to off.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Mark Holloway m
Man, I forgot I was working with Locations and AAR last night and I forgot to
remove the low bandwidth I set for BR1 to test AAR.
cBarge is working now based on setting Privacy to Off. Thank you to everyone
who helped. It is greatly appreciated. :)
On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:28 PM, Mark
Angel - What kind of phones did you test srst cBarge with? I can't get this to
work with my 7965 phones. I needed to add more details under the ephone
configuration in order for ephone-template 1 to be applied to the phone which
should make the cBarge softkey available during srst.
softkeys appear
for a split second, then they disappear and the normal softkeys (CallFwd,
etc) appear.
On Jul 20, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
Angel - What kind of phones did you test srst cBarge with? I can't get this
to work with my 7965 phones. I needed to add more details
:28 AM
To: Berry, Matthew J.
Cc: Mark Holloway; osl osl
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge in SRST ~(Again)
Sorry to jump in on the topic. Matt, just curious were you successful with
this configuration? It does not work for me with auto-provision none and an
ephone-template under
Graham,
Are you configuring this in your own lab or using Proctor Labs? I am using my
own lab (2800's, 12.4.24T3, 7965 phones) and I couldn't get cBarge to work in
SRST with auto provision none. Others using Proctor Labs said they could get
it to work. Perhaps it's a difference between IOS
I had the same problem. When the phones go into SRST mode and then I call from
the PSTN to Ph1's shared line and put the call on hold, I go to Ph2 and press
Ph2's shared line and see the cBarge softkey for a split second then it changes
to a ghosted Redial softkey. I could never get it to
Sorry, I didn't mean to say put the call on hold, what I meant was I let the
call sit idle while going to Ph2 and pressing the shared line. I would see the
cBarge softkey for a split second then it changes to Redial.
On Aug 4, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Mark Holloway wrote:
I had the same problem
In UCM how do you determine whether you are assigning single button cBarge or
normal cBarge?
On Aug 7, 2010, at 9:35 AM, cisco voip wrote:
That bug is for srst mode auto provision none.. for provision all, it should
work
The problem you are facing of having cbarge for split second is
In the real Cisco lab can you assign your own Key Mappings in Secure CRT (for
copy/paste functionality)? For example, I am running Secure CRT 4 at home and
I can assign Page-Up to copy and Page-Down to paste. I hope CTRL-C and CTRL-V
work in Notepad. :/
If I want a priority queue to have 25% of the port bandwidth, I have configured
shape 4. I want queues 2, 3, and 4 to share 40%, 40%, and 20% of the remaining
bandwidth. All the examples I have seen for shape/share show a value of 1 for
priority queue in share regardless of the fact shape is
, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:
If I want a priority queue to have 25% of the port bandwidth, I have
configured shape 4. I want queues 2, 3, and 4 to share 40%, 40%, and 20% of
the remaining bandwidth. All the examples I have seen for shape/share show a
value of 1
I have HqPh1 and HqPh3 both assigned to the same SUBSCRIBE CSS and HqPh3 has
BLF Speed Dial assigned to watch HqPh1's primary extension and everything works
great on HqPh3's line key that watches HqPh1. However, I am trying to access
the corporate directory on HqPh3 and expect to see presence
Från: Mark Holloway [...@markholloway.com]
Skickat: den 11 september 2010 07:47
Till: osl osl
Ämne: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Corporate Directory (BLF Presence Status)
I have HqPh1 and HqPh3 both assigned to the same SUBSCRIBE CSS and HqPh3 has
BLF Speed Dial
Yes, each End User's Extension Mobility section is populated with the same
Presence Group and SUBSCRIBE Calling Search Space.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Brian Mulgrew wrote:
Hi Mark - are your end users set for a Presence Group?
Thk
Brian
On 11/09/2010, Mark Holloway m
Thanks Tam. I thought the Primary Extension was the only required association
on the End User page. Of course the Device Phone also had the End Use
associated. Since the Phone Number entry on the End User page is not a
required field I didn't even think to populate it. :)
On Sep 11,
If I send a call from the HQ through the PSTN to BR2 and the calling number
from HQ is in E.164 format, the BR2 phone's main display (ie. large fonts)
doesn't show the + in front of 1XX but on the bottom part of the 7965's
screen it does show +1XX in smaller fonts. Is this
Is there an option so instead of the VM greeting being Sorry, Jon Doe is not
available it says Sorry, extension 5001 is not available. Basically, I want
it to say the extension instead of the name.
Thanks,
Mark
___
For more information regarding
Thanks. :)
On Sep 24, 2010, at 3:01 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote:
Remove the display name.
- Reply message -
From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 5:53 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Connection Greeting
To: osl osl ccie_voice
When BR2 is part of CUCM and CUE is integrated with CUCM through JTAPI I could
never get MWI to work if BR2 is in SRST. Has anyone been able to get this
working? Cisco docs say with older version of CUE it doesn't work. I think
they are referring to 2.x or 3.x, not 7.x.
Thanks,
Mark
] On Behalf Of Mark Holloway
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:53 PM
To: osl osl
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Anyone get MWI to work with CUE in SRST?
When BR2 is part of CUCM and CUE is integrated with CUCM through JTAPI I
could never get MWI to work if BR2 is in SRST. Has anyone been able to get
Parabens!
On Sep 24, 2010, at 8:11 PM, Marcelo Alexandria wrote:
Hello Guys ,
Since last year i m trying to pass in the lab , so in last Friday I was make
my 2nd attempt in version 3.
On Monday I got my results and I cant believe ..i passed!!!
So , I never post nothing here in
FAIL. Based on my score report it was not by much. I will go back in 30 days to
try again. It was my first Voice attempt. Next time I will go to San Jose
instead of RTP just because it's closer. Although, the proctor in RTP was very
nice and helpful. I wish she would go to San Jose.
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
