I think you're misunderstanding the concept. If you're the type of
person that needs to read email when offline, then simply enable local
saving. Nobody's forcing you to keep a single copy online.
But have you seen modern cell coverage maps of the country? What part
are you in that you can't get y
If you're arguing Eudora vs. Outlook I think you're preaching to the
choir. But none of these are good arguments against say, gmail via the
web interface.
*) No installation required
*) You can save attachments on all your machines, a year from now if you want
*) No need to keep track of mailfolde
Don't fall for this. The person claimed he needed to read his emails
when he wasn't online. I pointed out the fallacy involved. Namely,
that if he had a job that *really* required this, he could get cell
coverage over most of the country.
Of course, it turned out he really has no such need, and is
Yes, flash drives - or hard drives of any type - can and do fail
suddenly and without warning. That's not a problem if you're just
using them to transport files. And it shouldn't be a problem if you're
doing regular backups to them, since you should be warned of failure
when writing data. But do no
Why don't you guys start your own thread to whine about cell phones? I
started this thread to discuss online storage - "the cloud". Serious
topic hijacking.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, priv
I was only making a side point, not inviting a bash-fest of cell phone
companies.
But thanks for bringing us back on topic. In fact, I just got our bill
for our company backups - it was $1.78 last month on Amazon S3 (you
only pay for what you use). Mozy and others offer free limited
storage, which
Our backups in the cloud are certainly under OUR control. Well, mine
anyway. I tell it what to backup online, and if I need to access it, I
do.
Yes, I suppose Google et al, could announce tomorrow that they'll be
charging for gmail. But why live life based around what some company
*might* do in th
If I ever get a netbook with XP on it, and have the urge to try to put
Win7 on it, I'll be sure to install it to a new drive so I can run a
few benchmarks myself. Or not.
Anyway, there are more realistic tests out there involving desktops,
most of which show Win7 to be much faster. e.g. here's a >
Really badly written article, linking to at least one other of the
same type. It wants us to believe Al Qaeda is hiding around every
corner in cyberspace waiting to steal from us. But the only real
example it gives is of a guy that raised money legally - by taking out
loans and credit cards.
I br
Why are you adding all that unrelated stuff together? Just to make a
point with people that can't add???
If you're tired of hearing about cloud computing then you're on the wrong list.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:57 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> Online backups:
> $1.78-$4.60 per month for backup service,
It was a clever method to trick WinXP into running Firefox with lower
than administrator rights. The idea being that would lower the risk of
having malware installed.
Alas, it worked too well. You couldn't even update Firefox with it
running in restricted mode. I worked around that myself for a wh
No, I've never seen the name as derogatory. Most 'clouds' are good, aren't they?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:25 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> The "cloud" name is new, but it's a revamped version of an old idea. I'm
> just waiting for the new, new name for it. "Cloud" is a bad name. Too
> nebulous. The nam
Yes, this is called UAC (user access control?) and offers several
levels of sensitivity in Win7. I set mine to the highest, most
paranoid notch. A little window pops up asking if it's okay to run the
app as an administrator.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> Is there a conveni
Did I miss something? I don't own a cell phone so I'm not real
interested in that discussion, and I sure don't want to read the
review, but is this some sort of new tech? How and why does a cell
phone take pictures of itself?
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:22 AM, John Emmerling wrote:
> Finally, he is
I've installed 64 bit Win7 on my own machine at home and one machine
at work. I never do an in-place upgrade, so these technically aren't
"upgrades". However, my comp had Vista and the work comps have all
been XP.
I'm going to try it on an old Dell XP laptop soon, just to see if it
handles any bet
Then no, under no circumstances should you consider a RAID.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Michael Wosnick wrote:
> Fair point. It is a bit of an all-purpose, really. Multiple home users, main
> hub of a home network, and for me, a lot of Office apps, multimedia and
> movies, and multitasking.
It's only illegal if you don't already own a qualifying product. You
may remember when I installed Win7 on this machine I had to call MS.
They specifically walked me through installing my upgrade product to a
new bare drive. But I was replacing Vista; just not to the same drive.
On Sun, Nov 8, 20
I have no idea what you're talking about, unless you're just being
sarcastic. But I thought I'd point out that an annual re-installation
of the OS hasn't been advisable since the old Win9x days. The whole
WinNT line has always normally been stable enough to run for years.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7
You shouldn't have to install any driver software for a keyboard.
First, make sure it's the only keyboard. Then make sure it shows up in
Device Manager when you plug it in.
Also, USB 1.1 is fine for a keyboard or mouse.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Christopher Range wrote:
> When I got home
Well, perhaps your PDA can use the increased speed of USB2; that's not
surprising. But neither your mouse nor keyboard can operate faster
than USB1 speed.
>> Also, USB 1.1 is fine for a keyboard or mouse.
>
> I mentioned the version of the USB port, because, I have a USB cable
> connected to one
By the time you talk biannually then at that point there would also be
hardware issues like new motherboards to prompt a clean install. Note
that my workstations, not connected to the internet, or subject to
constant program installs, will run as fresh in a few years when it's
replaced as it did on
>It wasn't immediately clear how Microsoft uncovered the users' modifications.
Until the technique is explained, there's not much to comment on. It's
only half a story.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:15 PM, tjpa wrote:
> Microsoft Boots 1 Million Xbox 360 Players Over Piracy Fears
> http://money.cnn
Is this a question? You made the mistake of saving from Word 7 as a
.doc file. You need to save as a .txt (plain text) file if you want to
be able to open it in Word 3.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Marcio wrote:
> Here I am good guys. I sent to myself through e-mail a text I wrote in MS
> W
Yes, with nearly 10 percent of the market to Google's 70%, I'd say the
headline is accurate. After all, every time Apple market pushes 5% to
MS's 90%, you proclaim the end of MS.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:00 PM, tjpa wrote:
> Read the headline. Read the story. Tell me if this head fits on this b
I too understood that LCD monitors can't have burn-in. But exactly
what is this 'persistence'? Clearly it's not burn-in, since that's a
permanent condition of the phosphors and cannot be fixed short of
replacing the crt.
I'd like to hear some sort of an explanation of this phenomenon, and
perhaps
I dunno, he kind of dances around the question of what actually causes
persistence:
>What this does is cause the LCD crystals to have a memory for their location
>in order to generate the colors of that graphic.
I'm not even sure that's valid English. I _am_ sure it makes no sense
to me. What is
The Wikipedia article on LCD Persistence
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_persistence) actually has a good
explanation, FWIW. Perhaps the reason I haven't seen this on any of
our monitors yet is because I have them all set to power down in 2-3
hours. I do not use screensavers.
>The cause of thi
FWIW, our own experiments with eSata were disappointing. First, few
mobos actually supported hot swapping - in fact, none of ours did. We
could have lived with that, since our old drive caddys require
powering down to swap.
However, at random times the drives would suddenly slow down,
apparently t
I've seen it. Subscribed to it for a month or so. But never actually
saw any apps worth installing, so dropped it.
Thing is, most things I could already do with other apps I already
had. Some others were clearly "lite" versions that would only tempt me
to buy up. Still others were versions sure to
Yes, I am ridiculously annoyed by those extra 4 drives as well, so I
keep mine unplugged until it's needed. I'm also annoyed at Win2k so I
haven't run it in years. Great in it's time, but no need for it now.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> A five-year-old digital camera, con
FWIW, I've been using the new MS AV since I installed Win7. Not bad.
But it only works with Vista & Win7.
Anyway, if you can't even install an AV app, clearly it's time for a
clean OS reinstall. There's stuff building up in there and you're
fighting a losing battle.
*
Indexing is a Good Thing on modern computers with large hard drives. I
like the Win7 indexing, but I also have Google Desktop Indexing
installed. Of course, if I was like you and had a lot of super secret
things on my hard drive I can imagine this might be bad.
***
You are correct. Well, sort of. According to
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/resources.aspx?mkt=en-us&s=1#mainNav
it runs on WinXP Sp2 or Sp3, Vista, And Win7. Nothing about a 64 bit
limitation. I know my own install is Win7 64 bit and it works.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Art Cl
ts are *instant* as you type...sometimes I think
> it's so fast it comes up before I type it. This tool does not search
> contents of files, just looks at filenames, leaves almost zero memory
> footprint and a very small database. Windows only.
>
> http://www.voidtools.com/
>
That should work. But what worries me is the condition of the hard
drive, at least make sure it passes SMART tests.
Dreamweaver only needs a key and the original disks to reinstall. But
it's also fairly useless these days for modern CMS-driven websites.
Unless she's taking web design courses, in w
Hardly News. The US enjoyed many years of great affluence after being
the sole 'winner' of WW2, but aside from that this 'virtual slavery'
has always been the norm. Gives you a great admiration for the labor
organizers, until someone points out that's socialism and must be
stamped out at all costs.
Okay, I think I see the 'new' take on it. Or, at least I see it from
Wired's perspective.
Around here it's got nothing to do with extra hours. It's construction
jobs being lost to 'Mexicans' (anyone that speaks spanish). I've heard
it from both sides though - the employers complain the local guys
If you have to send a lot of faxes, do it on the internet. Note that
most people can take email now, so faxes may not be necessary. Are you
sure the Epson is shared on the network? Does either machine see it?
Do they both see shared folders on each other?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Marcio
I don't use Outlook. But in general, the way to do it is to send the
mail to yourself. The field won't be empty, but the bcc's won't see
each other, only you.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Andy Gallant wrote:
> In Outlook 2003 on Vista HP, I'm testing BCCs to multiple addresses. The
> usage
Sounds perplexing to me too. But of course I have no idea what type of
'mirroring tool' you're using, or how it handles duplicate, private,
or open files. And you should still have explorer set to hide system
files, so maybe that accounts for the 'ghosts'.
Even more perplexing to me is why you wou
. Of not may be that the perl script showed the
> folder in question with the missing files, does not exist at all, in anway
> way.
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Tony B wrote:
>
>> Sounds perplexing to me too. But of course I have no idea what type of
>> 'm
And this still doesn't answer the question why your properties is
counting these hidden system files. Mine certainly isn't. I mean,
assuming I have an extra desktop.ini in virtually every folder, it's
not showing up in my file counts.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 2:29 PM, mike wrote:
> That's why I e
Looks interesting, but I'm still leery of touchpads in general.
Anyway, since there's no version available for Windows yet, it's
useless on most systems.
I'm not sure what you mean about 'growing' gestures. All the ones I've
seen are gestures that have been used for ages. Either by moving the
whol
For basic HTML it's got a steep learning curve. But for todays
CSS-laden sites, it's got a massive learning *overhanging cliff*. Tom
seems to want to disparage CMS's uniformity, but that's why people
like them so much. Trying to program that much CSS by hand is a
daunting task not for the squeamish
I use two finger drags all the time. Three rarely. But with my mouse I
have a nice tactile "click" to tell me I've pressed a key. People like
tactile feedback in their tools.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:35 PM, tjpa wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Tony B wrote:
>>
&
He mis-spoke. "Dongle" is a term used for software anti-piracy
devices. What he meant to ask is if you used a USB wifi receiver.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&Description=usb%20wireless%20adapter
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Marcio wrote:
> What is exactly a USB W
Dropbox.com offers 2gb free cloud storage. That's a good place to keep
copies of your most important documents. Home users may prefer
Carbonite. Pros may prefer Jungledisk.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropbox_%28storage_provider%29
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:12 PM, phartz...@gmail.com
wrote:
> O
I've been watching for laptops for a friend, and I've seen nothing
that wasn't sold out. This is probably good news for the industry, but
it's making it hard to find a good dual core for <$600.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Ranbo wrote:
> For laptops or other electronics?
***
True, but USB3 is still vaporware. Or, is there a separate word for an
entire hardware standard that's way overdue?
Anyway, we have no trouble using USB2 external drives. But I sure
would like more bandwidth!
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:14 PM, mike wrote:
> You need to read up, USB 3 does allow fo
7;s not vaporware.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Tony B wrote:
>
>> True, but USB3 is still vaporware. Or, is there a separate word for an
>> entire hardware standard that's way overdue?
*
** Lis
Look, nobody's more upset about the delay for usb3 than myself. All
year I've been telling everyone that will listen that we'll be
changing over to usb3 around xmas 2009. But now that's not going to
happen, and from the looks of it we'll be lucky to change over before
*next* christmas.
At least we
Dumbest thing I've seen in ages. "On a tap the mouse will click, no
physical click required". Wow! No more onerous mouse clicking! Thank
god we're saved at last from the drudgery!
> Didn't take long...
> "By using MouseWizard, you can give your Magic Mouse three extra buttons,
> 'pinch', 'bloat' a
Agree about the topic hijacking. Start a new thread people; it's as
easy as changing the subject line.
The problem with this ACID test is that it wasn't designed by the
people that authored the #1 internet browser. If those people wrote
the test, their browser would pass it with flying colors, and
Highly unlikely you need more than 4 gigs of ram to edit most video.
What type of video is it?
The desktop might work (again, what type of video?). Be sure to format
the drives, or just replace them. You don't need special video cards
to edit video. You may have to add a 1394 (firewire) card to i
t of systems today
without resorting to "intermediate" codecs.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> Tony B asks what kind of video I'm editing. I'll be buying a high-end video
> cam (
Oh, and how could I forget - the Flip camcorders will do acceptable
720P video. $150 at Amazon now with free shipping.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Tony B wrote:
> The XM2 (or GL2?) would not be a wise investment at this point. I know
> you'll see lots of cheap used ones for sale,
If you can afford it, get the Sony Z5, but for $2000 you may have to
drop down to the Sony HD1000. Both are HDV, meaning they use the old
standard miniDV tapes. But really, just for web video I think you
should start with one of the cheaper cameras I mentioned earlier.
Although Youtube has started
The guy asked a straightforward question about video. There's no need
for 2-3 rabid Mac fans to pile on and hijack the topic. Take your
medications already.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, priv
I've used OpenDNS for so long I almost missed this. But Google now
offers a free DNS that's much easier to remember (8.8.8.8., 8.8.4.4)!
http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/
Quick - somebody else try it first!
*
** List
It may have to do with a UPS you have/had installed. You should be
able to turn it off in Control Panel>Power settings.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Robert Carroll
wrote:
> This happened just now, and has happened a few times before. Immediately
> after switching profiles on my DESKTOP compu
You think a $4000 HD video recorder is an appropriate investment for
entry into video production???
Note that the reason most shooters still prefer tape is because it's a
good *archival* storage format. Don't bother sitting around comparing
the cost of *temporary* storage like flash or HDDs or SSD
That's an awfully vague question. To give any useful answers we need
to know things like what printer, what computer, what OS (and is it
updated), and the exact error word for word. Most importantly we need
to know all the things you've tried already to fix it (verified
printer works from other com
You're right. It's whining. How would it even be possible to "own" a
network connection? And if your primary ISP is so bad that you had to
keep your old dialup and ever need to use it, then you need a new
primary ISP. I mean, I can count on both hands the hours that
broadband goes down here in a ye
I haven't seen any great evidence that tape is going away any time
soon. Not for several years anyway. It has too many _perceived_
advantages. Real or not doesn't matter to someone shelling out big
bucks *today*. Note I said _shooters_, not companies. The expense to
maintain tape is a big factor fo
Actually, this doesn't always apply to huge video files, which can
take ages to copy. When it does, it introduces all kinds of workflow
problems, and of course can double the expense as you duplicate
drives.
Nothing insurmountable, but not as simple as telling someone to back
up their documents.
A 2005 computer should be able to handle a 250G drive. But I wouldn't
assume it's SATA. You're going to have to open it and make absolutely
sure before you order a new one.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Reid Katan wrote:
> My Toshiba is claimed to have a 60G SATA drive in it. Assuming so, cir
That's just a monitor, isn't it? You shouldn't need any drivers. Are
you having some specific trouble?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Range wrote:
> I had to re-format my hard drive and, when I tried to install the driver,
> from the driver disc, it told me the disc was damaged. Wh
at 9:24 PM, Christopher Range wrote:
> Tony B wrote:
>> That's just a monitor, isn't it? You shouldn't need any drivers. Are
>> you having some specific trouble?
> It is a monitor. Just like you, I didn't think I would need drivers for it.
> But, There is a dri
At least *he* doesn't make the claim that this is anything new.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:43 PM, tjpa wrote:
> New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/09/kellner-new-apple-mouse-really-is-magic/
*
Ultra ATA <> SATA. I'm telling you, you'll be making a big mistake to
rely on anything except your own eyes. In most laptops, it's only a 5
minute procedure to open it up and look at it - probably less time
than you've taken so far playing with software. And you're going to
have to do it eventually
ttings. It may also not display a picture if it's
plugged into the 'wrong' DVI connector. Long story; just try the other
one.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Christopher Range wrote:
> Tony B wrote:
>>
>> The LG page at
>> http://www.lge.com/us/computer-products/
Along these lines, taking this to the limit will be the likes of
Project Natal. Why use a mouse at all if a camera can sense where your
hand is and what your fingers are doing?
*
** List info, subscription management, list r
Presumably some sort of add-on acting up? Have you tried starting FF
in safe mode (there should be a shortcut for this in the start menu).
Then try adding add-ons back one at a time. Can we assume browsing in
other browsers doesn't affect the system?
What's really surprising to me is that this hap
I hadn't thought about that. Since so many Mac owners actually run
Windows, they would be the first to be totally pissed off that their
Magic Mouse wouldn't work!
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:06 PM, mike wrote:
> http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2009/11/14588/
*
If you don't use add-ons, what's the point of using Firefox? You may
as well use IE8; it's actually safer than FF right now. But for
testing purposes there's also Opera and Chrome.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Reid Katan wrote:
> I don't load up with add-ons. Actually, none that I install on
This is a very misleading subject line, as we have no evidence or
indication that this data was stored in a cloud. Thus we also have no
evidence it was a failure of cloud storage that caused information
loss.
I just worry a couple of the luddites on the list will actually
reference this event in t
No. You have misinterpreted my point completely.
I am unfamiliar with what was lost because as soon as I saw it was a
question about classmates.com I knew I know nothing about them so I
stopped reading. Would that more people on this list did the same!
Anyway, after the thread got bumped for a fe
No, it most certainly is not. Thanks for helping to clarify.
Word definitions change, but generally "the cloud" refers to a bunch
of computers connected via network where your data is kept. It also
implies that there's no way of finding a specific copy of your data on
one hard drive; you really do
No, data on a remote server is definitely *not* in a cloud. I mean, my
website is on a remote server which is on a shared host so I don't
administer the server. But if I FTP a file to it, I haven't put the
file in a cloud.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Stewart Marshall
wrote:
> In that it is a
First, remember I pointed out I'm not completely sure if gmail via the
web is cloud-stored or not. Certainly if you use POP with gmail it's
not cloud.
But now I think we're all on the same page. Your revised definition
below is in line with my own. I could drive to my host and physically
take the
y remove
> the HD?
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Tony B wrote:
>
>> First, remember I pointed out I'm not completely sure if gmail via the
>> web is cloud-stored or not. Certainly if you use POP with gmail it's
>> not cloud.
>>
>> But now
I'm not sure who you heard this from but it is not true. But then,
Vista isn't slow to boot, so clearly this source is suspect.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:07 PM, db wrote:
> 7 may wake quickly from sleep but I hear that in practical use it is even
> slower than Vista to boot...
None of my machines use sleep. My own is usually running something,
maybe just fold...@home. But I turn it off at night. I also have them
all set to power down the monitors after a couple hours.
Last year with her new Vista laptop I gave the wife a choice of sleep
or shut down. She's a total non-t
Possibly. I wouldn't do it; I'd prefer a matched pair. However, our
own experiences with wireless has not been good. While one imagines
oneself having more freedom, say, to lean back in a chair, in fact you
can't do that because you need to be close to the monitor to read
stuff. Darned silly to hav
In general, no. When you install an OS it senses all the hardware and
tries it's best to work with that specific stuff. Replacing something
with a lot of hardware - like a motherboard - usually requires
reinstalling the OS. Not always, but personally I've never had good
luck doing it. An awful lot
Interesting dilemma. I can't imagine why them deleting a shortcut from
their desktop would affect your desktop. Or whatever menus you're
using to run the apps.
Much more annoying to me is when an app asks if I want to install an
icon to my desktop and I forget I had to use the elevated admin
accou
An interesting note: Win7 has moved this to C:\Users\Public\Desktop.
Anyway, I'm unaware of a method to automatically redirect a shortcut
from the public desktop to your own.
It wouldn't affect me for a few reasons. First, I would just replace
the shortcut as soon as I found it missing, probably v
Actually, I ran the Win7 RC from an external USB dock and it seemed
fine. I don't have esata hooked up, but all my USB peripherals seemed
fine. eSata is mostly controlled by the bios, not the OS, so I would
imagine it would work. I didn't even notice a slowdown or a
bottleneck, presumably because I
Does it say anything when it calls? Has anyone in the family died recently?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:53 PM, David Cowdrill wrote:
> Recently my cellphone (T-Mobile) began making random calls to my home phone
> as well as my wife's cell phone. We got two calls in the middle of last
> night. D
You forgot to tell us what the problem is. Or what you've already
tried to do to fix it.
BTW, You don't need too many PCI slots any longer. I have two and one
has firewire. What do you need your other five for?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Christopher Range
wrote:
> I have XP Pro SP1 via r
Sorry, I missed this the first time. It's true you must install SP2
before you can get up to SP3, so you don't have a choice; you must get
SP2 in there. What's unusual is that usually in a clean install there
shouldn't be any hangs. You aren't trying to install SP2/SP3 *after*
you've installed some
That might be the problem. Next time try installing SP2 immediately,
before you try to install the mobo drivers.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Christopher Range
wrote:
> I already did update all the drivers.
>
> It didn't make a difference.
*
What the heck are you talking about? You already said you aren't a
gamer, so you don't need good video hardware; onboard video will more
than suffice for business apps.
Audio? Creative hasn't upgraded their cards in ages, and you said you
have an old Audigy. How often do you replace audio cards? I
Well, as you've seen by now this isn't the case. The OP clings to the
belief that he needs all these PCI slots because he thinks the onboard
equivalents don't work as well. I'm not sure where he got that idea,
but I doubt we'll be changing his mind in our lifetimes. Since the
only card he would act
Actually, it's even easier to just get a disk with WinXP SP3 already
slipstreamed in. Install it, then enter your own license number. But
really, I doubt I'll be installing XP any longer; it was fun while it
lasted, but Win7 is too much of an improvement to make it worth the
while.
On Wed, Dec 16
A memory I'd successfully blocked out until now. I got my monstrosity
late one Saturday night as it was the only case they had with the
brand new ATX form. Lots of space to play around inside, but with a
menacing aspect due to its sheer size. Anyway, it too saw the dump a
couple years ago.
On Wed
Any new disk you buy will already have SP3 in it. Assuming they're
still selling XP. Then again, there are other places to download such
disks. You'll still need your own license to run it.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Christopher Range wrote:
> I haven't found a link on MS' website, that ma
So the video feed is unencrypted, who cares? Not like you can take a
predator on a top secret mission. Are we supposed to be worried they
are watching this instead of Fox News?
What I would hope is difficult to do is *take control* of the device.
*
It looks like Verizon Wireless is responsible. I don't remember them
having any trouble with the EU?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:57 PM, tjp wrote:
> Having made nice with the EU, but unable to resist evil for more than one
> day
>
> "Yesterday, all of the search providers that used to be availa
Ya, ccleaner is the way to go
(http://www.filehippo.com/download_ccleaner/). But note that, while
you should probably have it installed anyway, "cleaning" your registry
isn't likely to solve any system problems you may be having. I rarely
ever run the registry cleaner, preferring to just let the ol
701 - 800 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo
