On Saturday, 22 August 2015 at 13:03:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 17:05:42 UTC, tired_eyes wrote:
So, four months later, can we have some kind of warning banner
on dsource.org?
Done.
Excellent, thank you! It was a source of confusion.
On Friday, 21 August 2015 at 17:05:42 UTC, tired_eyes wrote:
So, four months later, can we have some kind of warning banner
on dsource.org?
Done.
So, four months later, can we have some kind of warning banner on
dsource.org?
On 28/04/2015 12:56 a.m., Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 03:36:24 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
[0] http://www.sourcetreeapp.com/
Git got a proper visualization of commit tree? :)
Better then anything else out there!
On Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 03:36:24 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
[0] http://www.sourcetreeapp.com/
Git got a proper visualization of commit tree? :)
On 25/04/2015 3:33 p.m., Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 21:48:30 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 22/04/2015 08:20, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
If you're forking a project on Github you get your own copy of the
project. The projects
are linked but the repositories are not. What I m
On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 21:48:30 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 22/04/2015 08:20, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
If you're forking a project on Github you get your own copy of
the project. The projects
are linked but the repositories are not. What I mean by that
is on your fork you'll see
that it is
On 22/04/2015 08:20, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
If you're forking a project on Github you get your own copy of the project. The
projects
are linked but the repositories are not. What I mean by that is on your fork
you'll see
that it is a fork with a link back to the original project. From the origi
On 2015-04-22 00:06, Stewart Gordon wrote:
One of the comments there: "Or you make your repository public, then
everyone (who is not a collaborator) has read-only access"
And everyone who _is_ a collaborator has what?
Push access (svn would call this commit access). I don't think
collaborato
On 21/04/2015 00:35, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
In the other thread I referred to this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5010754/github-collaborators-have-commit-access
which makes it sound as though it's possible to do the same thing in GitHub.
Is that
page wrong?
This question pertains to
On Monday, 20 April 2015 at 23:27:58 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 21/04/2015 00:19, Stewart Gordon wrote:
?? When I worked on the project on dsource, until it stopped
working recently I generally
had no trouble just committing my updates using SVN. I didn't
have to create patches at
all. As
On 21/04/2015 00:19, Stewart Gordon wrote:
?? When I worked on the project on dsource, until it stopped working recently I
generally
had no trouble just committing my updates using SVN. I didn't have to create
patches at
all. As I understood it, neither did anybody else who helped out (after
On 20/04/2015 00:25, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Even if he had, what would be the point? It would greatly slow down the whole
process.
We have SVN repositories so that people can just put their updates straight in,
Only those who have access can do that. Getting patches into the bindings
rep
On Friday, 17 April 2015 at 21:34:07 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
Has Walter promised us that every pull request for the
WindowsAPI bindings will be put in right away?
Pull requests are merged once they pass review and automatic
testing. Walter Bright is not the only person who can merge pull
r
The wiki is terribly broken at the moment. I just edited a page
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WikiStart
and it changed every linebreak to the literal string `\r\n`. The page looks OK in
preview, but then it breaks when you actually save it.
Stewart.
--
My email address is v
On Friday, 17 April 2015 at 21:34:07 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 17/04/2015 02:19, lobo wrote:
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 23:32:17 UTC, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
I don't understand - how would an average member of the D
community get into the DMD
package on dlang.org in order to apply these
On 17/04/2015 02:19, lobo wrote:
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 23:32:17 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
I don't understand - how would an average member of the D community get into
the DMD
package on dlang.org in order to apply these updates?
Get DMD, Druntime and Phobos and build them:
http://
On Thursday, 16 April 2015 at 23:32:17 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 16/04/2015 03:35, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/04/2015 11:25 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
How would we go about committing updates to it when this is
done?
Let's say there is a new function in gdi.h added.
You would look
On 16/04/2015 03:35, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/04/2015 11:25 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
How would we go about committing updates to it when this is done?
Let's say there is a new function in gdi.h added.
You would look for the file:
core/sys/windows/windows/gdi.d
And add the function
On 16/04/2015 11:25 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 08/04/2015 03:21, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 8/04/2015 9:44 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Yes, a set of bindings to eventually put into Phobos/druntime was the
aim of the WindowsAPI project from the beginning. But unfortunately,
progress ha
On 08/04/2015 03:21, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 8/04/2015 9:44 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Yes, a set of bindings to eventually put into Phobos/druntime was the
aim of the WindowsAPI project from the beginning. But unfortunately,
progress has been slow.
Instead of moving to Github, this
On 8/04/2015 9:44 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Yes, a set of bindings to eventually put into Phobos/druntime was the
aim of the WindowsAPI project from the beginning. But unfortunately,
progress has been slow.
Instead of moving to Github, this should be done instead. Thanks to
package.d f
On 07/04/2015 22:44, Stewart Gordon wrote:
So I guess I'll have to try committing just a few at a time and see if that
works.
Oh dear, it seems even that doesn't. It isn't predictable at what point it will fail, but
every single time it's failing somewhere. Even if I try to commit just on
On 07/04/2015 19:34, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 16:33:37 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
I haven't been active on the newsgroups lately, so lose track of what's going
on. Has
anything happened?
Just now I tried to commit to the bindings project on dsource, but got an err
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 16:33:37 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
I haven't been active on the newsgroups lately, so lose track
of what's going on. Has anything happened?
Just now I tried to commit to the bindings project on dsource,
but got an error
"POST request on '/projects/bindings/!svn/me
We are hardly work on modern CMS for news sites. It's beta
version work on dlang.ru I would like to suggest to move dsource
to our CMS, and make from it's collective blog.
I haven't been active on the newsgroups lately, so lose track of what's going on. Has
anything happened?
Just now I tried to commit to the bindings project on dsource, but got an error
"POST request on '/projects/bindings/!svn/me' failed: 500 Internal Server Error"
Has it been doing this for a
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 08:04:05 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 02.12.2014 23:20, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has
had spotty
uptime lately, I've offered to take over the hosti
On 02.12.2014 23:20, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has had spotty
uptime lately, I've offered to take over the hosting and any maintenance.
Although opinions exist that the site should s
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 23:26:42 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
The existing search result ratings for DSource are because of
all the existing links to it, and not so much because of the
content on DSource.
The site owner has some control using webmaster tools:
https://support.google
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 23:26:42 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
This will not help: clawling != indexing, and robots.txt only
stops crawling. robots.txt will not prevent a site from
appearing in Google search results, and it will not help in
lowering a site's search popularity. All it'
On 12/3/2014 2:42 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Violence is not the answer.
I'll look into adding a warning banner to the site template.
Alternatively, replace the pages in dsource with forwarding pages. The page
forwarded to can have two links - one to the original page, the other to the
mo
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 23:26:41 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> The existing search result ratings for DSource are because of all
> the existing links to it, and not so much because of the content
> on DSource.
that's why it should be replaced with stub. google ranking
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 22:48:50 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 21:32:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i think that the whole dsource site must be shut down and
replaced with
a stub (except planetD) to stop this disease. that site was
great, but
n
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 21:32:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i think that the whole dsource site must be shut down and
replaced with
a stub (except planetD) to stop this disease. that site was
great, but
now it does more harm than good.
Alternatively: use robots.t
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 21:37:33 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 20:42:27 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 20:24:05 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:13:1
On 12/3/2014 1:32 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
thank you. but i mean that dsource.org is still poping up in results
and it contains alot of obsolete projects. some projects was forked
long time ago and their dsource pages weren't updated, some are just
dead. people keep hitting ds
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 20:42:27 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 20:24:05 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:13:12 +
> > Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think DSour
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 20:42:27 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 20:24:05 UTC, ketmar via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:13:12 +
> > Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think DSour
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 20:42:28 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 20:24:05 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:13:12 +
Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
I think DSource should not be shut down, but instead
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 20:24:05 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:13:12 +
Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
I think DSource should not be shut down, but instead modernised
and open for new D-based projects. We, old D programmers, jus
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:13:12 +
Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I think DSource should not be shut down, but instead modernised
> and open for new D-based projects. We, old D programmers, just
> love DSource! :)
the problem with current dsource is that keeps poping up in first
On Wednesday, 3 December 2014 at 06:39:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 23:02:32 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 22:20:29 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D
I think DSource should not be shut down, but instead modernised
and open for new D-based projects. We, old D programmers, just
love DSource! :)
On 2014-12-02 23:20, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has had spotty
uptime lately, I've offered to take over the hosting and any maintenance.
Although opinions exist that the site should sim
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 23:02:32 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 22:20:29 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has
had spotty uptime lately, I've offered to take
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 23:02:32 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
[snip]
My blog is not there, but it's not pure D blog:
defenestrate.eu
defenestrate.eu/rss.html
If you can add an rss feed for specific categories he could just
add that. I know he's done that for some of the planet D blogs.
I'd
On 12/2/2014 2:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has had spotty uptime
lately, I've offered to take over the hosting and any maintenance.
Although opinions exist that the site should si
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 22:20:29 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has
had spotty uptime lately, I've offered to take over the hosting
and any maintenance.
Although opinions exi
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has had
spotty uptime lately, I've offered to take over the hosting and
any maintenance.
Although opinions exist that the site should simply be shut down,
I think archiving it would
50 matches
Mail list logo
