From: ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com
[mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 08:51
I don't think UL would be sued; the manufacturer is ultimately liable.
The is little or no
benefit of 3rd party certification of a product under Tort law.
The
Rich -
While I can't speak for Chris, there are a few reasons to
perform production line ESTs on 48V dc mains powered
equipment.
1) in 48Vdc SMPSs, the voltages present on transformer
insulation are typically in excess of ELV limits. If the
power supply has had fault testing performed that
Dave -
Perhaps I was misinformed, but it was my understanding that
70V battery was not panEuropean, but is specific to Germany
and Austria, and then not necessarily ubiquitous in those
countries.
I'd appreciate your expanding on this.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
We are looking for a good failure analysis company in the SF
Bay area. Anyone have any leads for companies you've had a
positive experience with?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
Perry -
A note of general concurrence with Joe's take on your
circuits. The various DSL power feeds are at this time
treated as hazardous voltage circuits. There is activity in
IEC, TC47, to consider requirements for remote feeding
circuits, but publication is not imminent.
The UL/CSA
Good morning.
I have a Yokogawa Electric, Model 2509, digital wattmeter
for which I have no manual. I searched both Manuals Plus'
and Manual Merchant's web sites and came up negative.
Even though this is a very simple meter, I would like to
have a manual for each piece of equipment in my
Rich -
Regarding UL Recognized Component Appliance Wiring Material,
the yellow book states that the marking must be on a tag,
the reel or smallest unit container, not surface marked on
the wire insulation, as referred to by Greg. Very few UL
FUS folks will accept surface marking, though I had
Gary -
Or for the less scrupulous than careless, to remove the
certification mark from a product and place it one that is
not safety certified.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
From: Gary McInturff
The Product
Peter -
If you have such a memo, please do provide a copy. I my
years working at UL and working with them since, it was ever
abundantly and adamantly maintained (by UL's FUS Label
Services group) that the Control Number is a required part
of the Listing Mark and there is no substitution for it.
Rich is quite right, in general. There are UL Listing Marks
available, but they won't have the other three required
elements that make up the complete marking (some may include
the word Listed).
The page Rich referred to in a UL Follow-Up Services
Procedure, though, is separate from the Section
Sorry. I clicked too fast during spell checking. I meant,
thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver
Think you, Angus.
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit
Think you, Angus. The title for this standard is:
Primary Batteries - Part 4: Safety Standard for Lithium
Batteries
In my case, and I think this is true of all Li ion cells and
batteries, it is a secondary battery, meaning rechargeable.
Primary batteries can't be or aren't intended to be
: Peter Tarver
I am looking for safety standards related to large
lithium-ion secondary batteries (nonautomotive). I've
searched several standards web sites (IEC, ANSI, IEEE,
CENELEC, BSI, UL, CSA) and there appears to be nothing
specific to lithium-ion cells.
Your help will be appreciated
I am looking for safety standards related to large
lithium-ion secondary batteries (nonautomotive). I've
searched several standards web sites (IEC, ANSI, IEEE,
CENELEC, BSI, UL, CSA) and there appears to be nothing
specific to lithium-ion cells.
Your help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Peter
the ACA on the topic of
when AS60950 will replace AS3260.
So my question stands.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:27 PM
Does any one have
Does any one have a view of when (or if) AS/NZS 60950 (based
on IEC60950, Third Edition) will become the legally required
standard for ITE in Australia and/or New Zealand (whether
independently or through TS001)?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:45 AM
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Tarver
peter.tar...@sanmina.com wrote
some stuff
Yes, there can be confusion about these terms.
However, I suspect that
the TC28 'material category' takes
John -
The RTI you are referencing from IEC TC28 appears to be not
the same parameter as being discussed. In UL parlance, as
you surmised, RTI represents Relative Temperature Index
and gives a maximum operating temperature at which a
polymeric material may experience for its other properties
to
Tony -
The UL746 series of standards are referenced in CSA/UL60950,
Annex P.2. RTI is a material property evaluated in UL746B,
Polymeric Materials - Long Term Property Evaluations. IIRC,
guidance on the applicability of RTI is given in UL746C,
Polymeric Materials - Use in Electrical Equipment
Yes.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On
Behalf Of Stone, Richard A
(Richard)
Group,
can you
The infamous Laser notice 50.
The following is Excerpted from Federal Register / Vol. 66,
No. 144 / Thursday, July 26, 2001 / Notices under the
heading titled, Laser ProductsConformance with IEC
608251, Am. 2 and IEC 60601222 (Laser Notice 50).
CDRH intends to amend its standards for laser
The tardiness of this reply is due to my employer's
insistence upon performance of tasks of their choosing to
accommodate remuneration in the locally common monetary
exchange units.
Jim Eichner pointed out a fallacy in my below statement and
I must acquiesce. By operating from memory (but I
Ed -
First and foremost, there must exist a resonant cavity
formed inside the semiconductor or in combination of the
semiconductor die and its packaging. Then the threshold
current (for population inversion of the lasing medium) must
be exceeded. Only the latter is related to external faults
I don't have the answer to Glenn's question, but do have a
comment on Nick's response.
Nick states: The rating of a UL rated fuse is more or less
the current at which it blows. The rating of a fuse to IEC
127 (used throughout Europe) is more or less the working
current of the fuse and the
Not so. Most household appliances contain motors (excluding
entertainment appliances). Motors (ac induction types; the
most commonly used) are generally less efficient at lower
voltages (largely by virtue of their increased I^2*R loss)
and draw more current to perform the same amount of work or
Peter -
1) Agreed. Keep in mind that IEEE 802.3 compliant signals
are unearthed SELV and how SELV is derived in the power
source was not specified.
2) There are potential problems, but this is not to say
insurmountable. I doubt, however, that LAN cable meeting
Reinforced insulation
Amund -
For the most part, installation code issues, component
standard issues, power cross (overvoltage) testing and a
number of other items sprinkled throughout the standard.
You will need to buy a copy of the standard to get the full
picture. It is not simple enough to place in an e-mail.
I have a Kurz, model 441s hot wire probe unit. Refer to
http://www.kurz-instruments.com/
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Mikolajewski [mailto:kmiko...@catena.com]
Sent: Monday,
Job Title: Product Integrity Engineer
Job Location: San Jose, CA
Company Description:Sanmina is a Tier-1 electronics manufacturing
services (EMS) company with over 50 world class manufacturing facilities.
Sanmina provides a full spectrum of integrated, value-added services that
Job Title: Product Safety Engineer
Job Location: San Jose, CA
Company Description:Sanmina is a Tier-1 electronics manufacturing
services (EMS) company with over 50 world class manufacturing facilities.
Sanmina provides a full spectrum of integrated, value-added services that
includes:
The same is easily said of other products, Rick, like firearms (where there
are politically motivated lawsuits in progress and also directly analogous
to the tobacco lawsuits on many levels), hot coffee from MacDonalds, ad
infinitum. That a product is known to be hazardous or dangerous is not
From the Telecom Digest
Monty Solomon wrote:
Cell Phone Suit Will Get Its Day in Court
NEW ORLEANS, La. - In ruling that could shake the cell phone industry, a
federal judge let stand a lawsuit that says companies are making and selling
cell phones with the knowledge that they may be
The component is marked, does not comply...?
I haven't seen that one yet.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
-Original Message-
From: acar...@uk.xyratex.com [mailto:acar...@uk.xyratex.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
I need to add the following to clarify my below statements regarding FDA
certification.
21CFR, Chapter I, Section 1002.1(b) allows exemption for components intended
for sale exclusively to other manufacturers for use in other products. The
implication is that, if the component might be sold
Hi, KB.
It is incorrect that IEC825 does not apply to components. In the case of
components, the worst case emissions, based on power supply and any other
factors that affect output power/energy must be considered.
The FDA requirements in 21CFR requires all laser sources, devices or
products to
...@mail.monarch.com'; peter.tar...@sanmina.com;
Peter Tarver, in the message below, mentions he obtained a
new edition of
the IT safety standard CSA60950/UL60950.
I have been unable to locate a Dec. 1, 2000 edition of
UL60950 on the IHS
Global DOcument website, nor have I found a CSA60950
Ghery -
He is correct. There are DELTA configured transformers with
one phase earthed in the US. This is referred to as corner
grounded.
Refer to
http://saskpower.apogee.net/foe/ftdttd.asp
for a brief on the applications. The site is incomplete
(overall), but has some useful information.
The main page for the site is still up, just none of the
content we all seek.
http://w3.hike.te.chiba-u.ac.jp/iec417/ver2.0/html/index.htm
l
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina.com
---
Failed on the first try. Let's try again.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:57 AM
To: 'EMC-PSTC Forum'
Cc: 'Barry Esmore'
Subject: RE: 2 Phases in North America
This is a recurring topic.
While
Brian -
The MW represents an NEMA/ANSI magnet wire type. As I'm
sure you're aware, there are a number of constructional
variations for magnet wire coatings with regard to costing
materials and thickness. Those meeting some minimum
specifications associated with an MW type will advertise the
Also FYI:
Domain Name: I-SPEC.COM
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
POB 211
Or Yehuda
60251
IL
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact: Griver, Jon
Perhaps the same Jon Griver of 601help.com:
Powerful Connections Ltd.
We are in the process of performing evaluations to ITUT
K.45, which references K.44 for test circuits and methods.
In K.44, there are both couplers and decouplers referenced,
when connecting the surge generator to an EUT and between
the EUT/generator and adjunct equipment. These devices are
not
Alex -
No, TS001-1997 is called up by the Telecommunications
Labeling Notice 2001, and so is still required. TS001-1997,
in turn, calls up AS3260 (TS001 has still not been updated
from the 1997 edition, even though AS/NZS 90950 has been in
publication for almost two years). I note that neither
John Gary -
In point of fact, the Accession letters are *only*
acknowledgement of receipt of report materials. The do not,
nor are they intended to convey anything about compliance.
In light of their intended function, it is reasonable to
expect they are sent automagically. Compliance is not
Arjen -
Check the Conditions of Acceptability on the coatings you're interested in
using. UL Recognized conformal coatings are, for the most part, are tested
for use on the bare board (base laminate) and are not tested for use on
solder masks.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
Nortel Networks
Early this week I received a copy of CSA60950/UL60950, Third Edition, the
new Bi-National Standard, based on IEC60950, Third Edition. The edition
number was maintained to correspond with the IEC standard edition number.
Publication date is 1DEC2000. Nifty.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
At one time or another, we certainly all do. Each NRTL has its own level of
absurdity, whether by being too harsh or too lax.
There is one NRTL the international safety community of a previous employer
had agreed was lax to the point of not accepting any component or OEM device
that certified
I've had this kind of thing pulled on me before, to. Start with their team
leader, then group leader , then section head, then dept. manager, until you
get satisfaction.
Peter Tarver
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug [mailto:dmck...@gte.net]
Sent: Thursday
Gary -
The below may be a little more than you bargained for, but here goes. My
apologies, if this is more basic than your question.
Each of the drawings in Figures NAB.1 and NAB.2 show grounding electrodes at
the bottom. In Figure NAB.1, the electrode is used to earth the centralized
dc power
Kurt -
Except under special circumstances, the USNEC does not use color coding for
phase conductors. There are reserved insulation colors for ground (green,
with one or more yellow stripes) and for neutral (white or natural gray
[whatever that is]). Otherwise, your free to use whatever color
Richard -
Then the answer is no. The MOT, as Pete Perkins pointed out, establishes
the test points for thermal conditioning, but solder resists are then tested
in conjunction with the PWB only for flammability classification.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
You're welcome, Richard.
MOTs are developed for a copper clad industrial laminate and verified by
certain tests on a finished PWB. Conformal coatings are not a normal part
of this process, though I suppose a board house could ask for such
considerations to be made for a selection of coatings.
Richard -
Basically, yes, though you may want to throw in a fudge factor to assuage
your caution/due diligence monkey.
FYI: The Maximum Operating Temperature (this is a normal operating condition
temperature) for a PWB is based on accelerated aging testing, and comparing
as received performance
Richard -
What is required is approval by any of the individual state's governmental
bodies in Australia. I can't find my list of authorities at the moment, but
perhaps someone else can.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From:
Chris Maxwell asks: Can anybody shoot a hole in this theory with a single
fault condition?
This subject has been debated before, on this list and elsewhere.
Safety is always relative. In the scenarios you painted, Chris, the phase
conductor always has an intact fuse after the neutral fuse
There seems to be some confusion regarding terminology and the location of
the overcurrent protective devices being discussed.
In the US and Canada, if a circuit breaker is located in the panelboard,
John is generally correct that the neutral will not be controlled by the
circuit breaker. On the
There is no correlation between air filter flammability class and the UL94
classifications.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Jim Eichner [mailto:jim.eich...@xantrex.com]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 10:17 PM
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Richard is absolutely correct. It's like trying to compare a match stick to
a bon fire.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wo...@sensormatic.com
I just went through this myself. There is no real correlation between UL94
flame ratings and
Bandele -
Please forgive an ignorant question:
I'm not going to pretend to be an EMC standards expert, but I fail to see
how the presence or absence of processing an incoming signal has anything to
do with whether there is a direct or indirect connection to outside lines.
To wit: outside is
Further on HD topics, I reviewed several HDs on the IHS web site and found
them to not be of much use, beyond giving standard references in each
country for the point of harmonization, with dates of withdrawal, and the
like. I didn't find any, in the dozen or so I looked at, covering diverse
Richard -
I have no direct evidence to support a claim either way, but if a material
can only meet HB requirements, I have strong doubts about its ability to
have a FS of 200, using ASTME84 test. The Steiner Tunnel testing uses a
significantly different method from the 1/2 in. flame test used
Other items include:
service entrance equipment
panelboards and circuit breakers (in general)
insulated wiring
GFCI outlets
flue dampers
double-walled flue pipes
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Price, Ed
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000
Peter -
Thermistors are in common usage and my limited experience with them
indicates they are reliable for their intended function.
The thermal issues have been discussed, and the usual regimen for high
temperature components applies. I'm not aware of any other particular
safety concerns.
I really don't have a clear idea of whether or not your solution will work.
Let us know.
NTCs, as with most thermistors, get very hot when in their switched state.
For the NTC, that's it's steady-state condition. I wouldn't put this in a
junction box with other wiring, unless you're absolutely
Lauren -
I'm not familiar with NFPA79, so I'll answer only with regard to NFPA70 (the
US NEC).
The 125% issue in the NEC is for two items: attachment plugs sizing and
circuit breaker sizing (1/1.25 = 0.80), both relative to load current.
Attachment plugs for equipment that contain motors must
My experience with safety agencies is they do not want to rely on traces
opening to act as fuses and no standards have been developed, that I am
aware of, to address this issue. Fuses certification gets involved in the
metallic alloys used, to the fraction of a percent, the conductor size,
but to rely on that mechanism
for fire prevention is a bit far fetched. From my limite experience with
fuses, there is generally a large structure that is enclosed in sand to
prevent a fire from spreading.
Jim Freeman
Peter Tarver wrote:
My experience with safety agencies is they do not want
Rich and Andy -
There is an additional reference in 4.3.9 of IEC60950, Second Edition, and
applies where certain types of required insulation can be bridged, rather
than being limited to just power supply cord conductors (though this could
easily have been the origin of the requirement [actually,
Ted -
At issue, really, is whether or not the under side of the raised floor is
used for environmental air, not simply that it's in a computer room. For
the question at hand, though, I'll assume that's the case.
My first inclination is to say it's not allowed. If you also look at 300-22
of the
Lisa -
While I can't speak directly to the case in EN61326, this sounds a lot like
the concept of a centralized dc power system, as addressed in UL1459 and
carried over into CSA950/UL1950 and working it's way into IEC60950 as a dc
mains supply (there is only reference in IEC60950, Third Edition,
Luiz -
Bimetal switched are used as manual and automatic reset thermal protectors
in electric motors, transformers. Very common and has been for many years.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
Tamura makes a good quality product, but most of their transformers are UL
Recognized, rather than Listed.
You can search UL's web site in their Certifications area, using the CCN
XOKV and probably get the latest set of companies with Listings.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Bimetal switches have been used for decades and proven generally to provide
an adequate or better safety protection function. Not all bimetal switches
are autoreset types; some require manual resetting. I've also experience
bimetallic thermal protectors in motors in an open failure mode, more
That's really just a rule of thumb. A working premise that provides
reasonable results in a relatively short time. As Kaz mentioned, it's not
uncommon for some circuits/parts to exhibit a cycling of temperature, either
by cyclical loads presented to them or some form of (generic) limiting
Peter -
UL has no problem with components bridging the insulation, provided you
comply with the appropriate testing in the standard and provide otherwise
appropriate clearances and creepages (just as you expected).
In Europe, the Nordic countries require Supplementary insulation between
SELV and
Not so dumb. It's probably a translation issue, since Kenji and the English
alphabet are nothing alike. I've mostly seen it spelled in all-caps as
DENTORI.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Homologation Engineering
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From:
For ITE, refer to IEC60950, 3rd ed, Subclause 1.7.7.2, first dashed
paragraph.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Homologation Engineering
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: bur...@andovercontrols.com [mailto:bur...@andovercontrols.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June
Don -
There are additional details beyond the following, but in essence, there are
pull-out and wire retention tests that are done for field wiring purposes
that may or may not have been done for factory wiring purposes. Field
wiring terminal blocks are subjected to the full range of tests
Hi, Peter.
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Dear All,
1. For ITE (without a connection to a telecommunication
network), what are the applicable standards and requirements? I assume
AS3260
(safety) and AS3548 (emc) and the manufacturer applies the C-Tick Mark (ie
Hi Rich.
The exception being Table G.2 of IEC60950, 3rd ed. Table G.2 clearly states
its applicability up to 2km, when using Annex G and its Alternative method
for determining minimum clearances.
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Hi
My apologies for not sending this to the group originally. Others may have
interest.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Homologation Engineering
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Tarver, Peter [SC1:4N02:EXCH]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 1:16 PM
To:
IEC60825-1 contains requirements for noncoherent infrared radiation.
Likewise does EN60825-1, with Amendment A11.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com
From: Israel Yeshurun [mailto:israel_yeshu...@creoscitex.com]
Can some comment on this ?
Can Infrared
From: Ned Devine [mailto:ndev...@entela.com]
Hi,
Hi, Ned.
OK, I wasn't going to say anything, but.
1.A UL Listed product complies with all of the applicable
requirements. Usually from a standard.
2.A UL Recognized Component does not comply with all of
the applicable
All -
In addition to all of the other comments (all essentially true), I would
like to clarify one issue, touched on by Rich Nute, but not made as clear as
could be. The backwards UR ligature is copyrighted by UL and can not be
applied to a product certified by another NRTL, without violating
This echoes the hue and cry based on ISO 9000 registration requirements in
the early '90s. These requirements were placed on the purchasing side of
businesses. There was quite a bit of noise emanating from the US and
Canada that this was a de facto nontariff trade barrier erected by
Microsoft Word - 13608_48002
Adding more fuel to the fire, some AHJs demonstrate a preference for
certain NRTLs, meaning they place more credence in some NRTLs
certifications over others. This will not necessarily be found in writing.
If a product is a relatively new technology in a field,
I was unaware that UL certifications had a 1 year shelf life. That
statement from UL devalues UL certification in a big way.
At a previous employer, we had an environmental chamber moved to a building
that had been renovated before we moved in. The AHJ red tagged the
chamber, because it
From: Bill Owsley [mailto:wdows...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 07:46
UL used to have to have a near monopoly and was a non-profit company to do
this.
Then the Federal law changed to implement the NRTL program so that there
are a number of
competitors
This misses the mark.
The Construction Product Regulation (305/2011/EU) is replacing the
Construction Product Directive (89/106/EEC).
Is there a palpable difference between an EU Directive and a Regulation?
Some fewer whereases, but the look and feel is the same.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
This email message is for
Thank you for the responses.
305/2011/EU states 89/106/EEC is repealed upon publication of 305/2011/EU.
At present there are no harmonized standards applicable to 305/2011/EU
that I could locate, but
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/construction/legislation/index_en.h
tm
contains a link
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 00:58
10 Jan 2012, Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com
writes:
snip
At present there are no harmonized standards
applicable to 305/2011/EU
snip
Where does one find a list of harmonized standards
associated
From: Brian Oconnell
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:23
Inspector shows up, unannounced, and walks into the
engineering lab.
AHJ (municipal) auditor - ...can't have exposed
hazardous electrical on the
benches. And these sprinklers do not seem correct...
me - only experienced engineers
Brian -
The UL molder's program is a paper chase for traceability. That cost
seems unlikely to be directly attributable to charges they pay to UL,
unless something has drastically changed under the latest management.
The only way this could cost a company $10E6 is very high volume and the
time
Howdy all.
Contact Shannon regarding this position.
See below.
Doesn't say, but probably in San Jose, CA.
Peter Tarver
ptar...@ieee.org
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From:Schlothauer, Shannon
sschl...@aerotek.com
To:ptar...@ieee.org ptar...@ieee.org
Date
From: Macy [mailto:m...@basicisp.net]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 07:32
Next you'll tell us the component was radioactive, made
of some 'surplus' material. Like all that gold jewelry
that found itself on the market way back when.
or the cheese graters from not so very long ago.
This
Good morning.
In the US, low voltage is considered 600 Vac or less.
Medium voltage begins above 600 Vac.
In Canada, low voltage is considered 750 Vac or less.
Medium voltage begins above 750 Vac.
Is there a similar (harmonized or not) voltage level
transition in Europe? Is the LVD's 1000
Kim –
You can review these links as a starter.
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/construction/index_en.htm
http://www.exploreconstruction.eu/index.jspx
Peter Tarver
*From:* Kim Boll Jensen [mailto:k...@bolls.dk]
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2012 02:24
*To:* EMC-PSTC
ANSI/SPI B151.1-2007: Plastics Machinery -Horizontal Injection Molding
Machines -Safety Requirements for Manufacture, Care, and Use
I found it on ANSI's web site for $50
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
-Original Message-
From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012
From: Brian Oconnell
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 14:49
And Peter Tarver would say to also look at TR62102.
I'm special that way.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to put on my helmet (it has shiny new tin
foil today!) and ride the little yellow bus to where the nice lady gives
us cookies. I
Hi.
The UK are cosigners to the HAR agreement. However, BS 7671 calls out a
number of BS standards for cables, but does not mention HAR cable.
Can HAR cables be used in the UK and meet BS 7671? What sort of
limitations are there?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
This email message is for the sole
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
