I would just do a FORMAT of the card IN THE CAMERA. Then take a bunch
of photos of no importance just to put some images on the card. Then
format again. Take another bunch of photos, reformat again. I believe
if you do that, there is no way any of your original photos could ever
be recovered.
The 1D bodies are the only true professional grade digital cameras. My
first Canon digital was a D60, which I still use on occasion, but when
I got my original 1Ds a few years ago, it was a night and day
difference. The D60 feels like a toy in comparison... and as a
consequence, the quality of
I'm not fully understanding what you mean? Putting BW filters on the
digital camera itself? I don't think that would do anything for you. As
far as I know, the photo is still taken in color, it is just
desaturated in camera in the BW mode. Far better to use the color
photo, then convert in PS
Mr. Bill and others,
Yes I am dissatisfied with the auto white balance. It cannot deal with
mixed lighting issues... that is the real problem. As others here have
stated, it is a very difficult problem to compensate for, I'm thinking
my best bet is to continue with what I am doing... shooting
Perhaps someone here, well, I KNOW someone here, can help me with this.
How would you say is the best way to achieve correct white balance IN
CAMERA with a digital camera in mixed lighting situations?
I normally use my White Bal grey card, then use that as my correction
point in post
My last two weddings I have noticed some slightly out of focus shots
for no reason that I could understand. Using flash, fast enough shutter
speed, it just made no sense to me. I use a 1Ds with 24 - 70L lens.
Well, in testing today to try to recreate the problem, I finally
realized what I have
In an effort to do away with Fong Dongs, and Flip Its, and Lumi
Whatgamacallit Thingamajigs, I have been experimenting with the built
in wide panel diffuser and catch light bounce panel on the 580 EX.
This goes against the Canon manual, but I seem to be having luck using
the following
On Oct 2, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
- trying to get a handle on cataloging and storing your images safely
before
you have 6 million of them.
Well said... I think this is probably one of the FIRST things anyone
new to digital needs to seriously think through. Most people now a
To go off on a totally useless course, am I the only one who thinks all
the current DSLRs are UGLY? Especially the larger cameras such as the
1D series. Do these cameras HAVE to look the way they do? To my eye,
the Hasselblad H series cameras are a beautiful design, or at least a
step in the
On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Jane Waters wrote:
(and am sort of content with the original 1Ds - but that's sour
grapes because if I
had the money, I'd buy the new one in a heartbeat),
LOL... I'm in the same boat. Funny how when I bought my 1Ds it was the
absolute ultimate digital
I am really anxious to see some in-depth tests on the new 1Ds Mk. 3. A
thought comes to mind. Are more and more pixels really a good thing on
the same size sensor? The point and shoot cameras have horrible noise
at high ISO due to cramming too many pixels on the tiny sensors. The
general
On Aug 23, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Roger Eichhorn wrote:
On 23 Aug 2007, at 6:00 PM, Steve Parrott wrote:
I just today received a Tamron 18-250 lens that is supposed to work
with Canon EOS cameras. However, when I mount it on my D60, I have no
aperture reading, the auto focus will not work
On Aug 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Bob wrote:
Steve Parrott wrote:
I just today received a Tamron 18-250 lens that is supposed to work
with Canon EOS cameras. However, when I mount it on my D60, I have no
aperture reading, the auto focus will not work, and if I try to take
a photo I only get
On Aug 22, 2007, at 7:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sample shots on the Fong website of course look wonderful. It
appears to me the before shots were done with the flash at max
output, then the diffuser put on and flash output correctly set. Not
saying Mr. Fong is being dishonest, but
I just today received a Tamron 18-250 lens that is supposed to work
with Canon EOS cameras. However, when I mount it on my D60, I have no
aperture reading, the auto focus will not work, and if I try to take a
photo I only get Error ...001.
I know in digital terms the D60 is an antique, but I
Well... now I am back where I started... with two opposing replies! I
think the best thing to do is as another poster stated, and just do
some tests to see for SURE!
Thanks all,
Steve Parrott
On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:20 AM, Don Weiss wrote:
Steve Parrott wrote:
I know someone here can answer
I know someone here can answer this for me. I will try to explain as
clear as I can.
I know the rule is your shutter speed should be at least the
reciprocal of your focal length to avoid blur, (assuming no form of
image stabilization).
I want to use a lens with a max zoom rating of 250 on a
Thank you Bob.
Steve
On Aug 21, 2007, at 5:18 PM, Bob Wise wrote:
Use 1/250 for your rule of thumb. The cropping isn't image
magnification.
-bw
On Aug 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Steve Parrott wrote:
I know someone here can answer this for me. I will try to explain as
clear as I can.
I know
Here is an item on which you can save your money. The Gary Fong
Puffer is a diffuser gizmo that mounts into the hot shoe of your DLSR
and provides a diffusion shield in front of the pop up flash. Yea, I
know, we are not supposed to even think of using a pop up, but at times
it can really come
The simple solution to the eating of AA batteries in a compact is to
NOT use the monitor. Keep the stupid thing OFF and use the viewfinder
to take your pics. (I will not even consider a compact without a
viewfinder... fortunately Canon has kept the viewfinder in their
compacts). Also, set the
Personally, I also REALLY like a camera, or anything, that uses plain
ole AA batteries. They are cheap and readily available. You can always
use the lithium Energizer AA batteries from Eveready great power
and last a lng time. Expensive though. Also, they do not go down
gradually like
Hey, a fellow former X700 user! That was also my camera of choice, and
was a really great piece in it's day. It still is today as far as that
goes. Mine never let me down and was a great compromise between
automation and manual control. I learned a lot using it. Still have
mine, in perfect
I had someone tell me that Canon no longer sells the ST E2 transmitter.
There is a photo of it on Canon's website, but no price or way to
order. Also, I cannot find it on the B-H site. *I* already have one, so
do not need it, however a friend of mine wants one to remotely fire his
Canon
, at 3:02 PM, Steve Parrott wrote:
I had someone tell me that Canon no longer sells the ST E2
transmitter. There is a photo of it on Canon's website, but no price
or way to order. Also, I cannot find it on the B-H site. *I* already
have one, so do not need it, however a friend of mine wants one
Very nice photos David! Your sentiments are right on also. Even after
having done many, many weddings, the stress factor is still there for
me. I think it was someone on this list though that said being nervous
is what keeps you on your toes and produces good photographs. If you
ever get too
Might be fast, but without IS it's still hard to handle... wait,
child. Your day will come :-) My
money is on the 70-200 2.8 IS. Yes, it's a tad slower, but it was
worth every dollar spent. You
sound like me... only I'm waitin for the 1Ds Mark III and then I'll
have to fork over money for
To be honest, the 28-300 4/5.6 L IS is not my favorite lens. Quite
large and heavy, plus I do not like the push / pull zoom type function.
I actually use it very little, however, it does cover a good range
which can come in handy at times. However, I use it seldom enough that
I will sell mine
Sorry Wilber... already sold anyway.
Steve
On Apr 11, 2007, at 3:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow that is really a good price. Considering your thoughts on the
lens- let me put my hands on one and test it first before I commit.
Thanks Wilber
- Original Message - From: Steve Parrott
On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Bob wrote:
To the EOS group, the images are from my 20D 8^)
What printers are people using to print photos?
My Canon i950 decided to go all blue again and I am waiting for the
unhelpful help people at Canon to respond again.
I think it is time ro move the
I have this lens, but have mixed feelings about it. I actually have
become somewhat afraid to use it. EVERY time I have used it for indoor
studio portraits, I ALWAYS have some shots that are out of focus. I do
not shoot any larger than 5.6, many times using 8.0. I manually select
my focus
Am I wasting lots of time and effort selecting specific focus points? I
always try to select a point that is nearest to the area in the photo I
definitely want to be in focus, such as the eyes in a portrait. So of
course, when I change from portrait to landscape orientation or the
desired
Just got a new Holga FN. It will be great to enjoy just cheap
photography for the fun of it again, and maybe even create something
really artistic along the way. Still love my 1Ds and all the L lenses,
I just need a break from it for a while. :-)
Steve
(tired of going broke thinking I have
ISO 6400 with no noise would have to be something I would have to see
to believe. I would not count on that too much. It would certainly be
great if possible... but I don't believe it is.
Steve
On Feb 23, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Jane Waters wrote:
--- Schlake (William Colburn) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am wanting to find a film scanner that will scan medium format (120 -
6cm x 6cm) film negatives. Does such a thing exist? Anyone have any
suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Steve
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including
On Feb 21, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Austin Franklin wrote:
Hi Steve,
I am wanting to find a film scanner that will scan medium format (120
-
6cm x 6cm) film negatives. Does such a thing exist? Anyone have any
suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Yes they exist. How much do you want to spend, and
I'm kind of in the market for a digital projector, but the prices keep
stopping me short. WHY are these things so damn EXPENSIVE? I just don't
see it. You can buy a freaking COMPUTER for a fraction of the cost of a
half ass projector simply throwing a poor quality image on the wall. I
found a
Naah... the stuff of dreams is the Hasselblad 39 megapixel H3.
Steve
www.parrottimaging.com
On Feb 9, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Jane Waters wrote:
Oh, great just what we need is a new Mark III, and it will be so
good that we'll have to
upgrade all that glass in our gear bags... can you say
Just out of curiosity, does anyone here use auto select focus points
with their cameras? I personally never have with my 1Ds, I just have
too great a fear it will focus on the wrong area during a critical
shot, such as a wedding. It would REALLY be handy to be able to use it,
just concentrate
Ok.. someone please set me straight. When you speak of the LUMISPHERE,
are you referring to the Gary Fong LIGHTSPHERE I have never heard
of a lumisphere, and I have never heard the *lightsphere* referred to
as a lumisphere before now. I have used the lightspheres for a long
time and have
Anyone seen this? I think most Mac users, me being one, feel kind of
smug as relates to virus dangers, but we should still be cautious.
Steve
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?
articleID=186700027
*
***
***
I am a Lightsphere user. I have had all 3 versions of it, and now use
the flexible, opaque with the inverted dome. I have found my best
settings to be the most simple. If there is any kind of available light
at all, I just set the camera to Program mode, use the dome in the
sphere, raise the
I use the Gary Fong Light Sphere on my 580EX. In fact, I never shoot
flash without it, including weddings. It is so simple yet brilliant in
it's design. It is a dome that fits over your flash and distributes
light in a uniform 360 degree circle. No need for a bracket. The newest
design
I'm going to put my 2 cents in on this topic also. I began a pro
photography business a little over 2 years ago. I went into it with the
edict of NO wedding photography, basically just because it scared me
half to death. Well. one thing led to another, and I ended up doing a
wedding. It was a
I had to shoot a wedding where flash was not allowed... AND... I was
not allowed closer than about 20 feet to the couple during the
ceremony. My 70 - 200 2.8 IS saved the day. I shot almost the entire
ceremony at 2.8, and was able to set ISO at no higher than 600, and
still get clear, handheld
On Jan 23, 2006, at 9:27 AM, David Young wrote:
Yesterday, on one of the Leica lists, Mark Bohrer posted a couple of
shots depicting rain... as a droplet on the end of a leaf.
I can understand his efforts (and a nice shot it was, too)... for
unlike snow, rain is very difficult - no, almost
I think Jim has brought up one of the main RAW vs. JPEG elements. *HOW*
you do your RAW conversion can make all the difference in the world. I
also use CAPTURE ONE for RAW conversion. (I only shoot RAW... NEVER
JPEG). There is absolutely NO comparison between the Capture One
program and the
Would someone here be kind enough to give me a little lesson on flash
second curtain sync? I know it can be used for making light trails
appear behind a vehicle rather than in front, but is that the only
purpose of it? Are there any other circumstances where it can be a
necessary or creative
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 22/11/05, Steve Parrott, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would someone here be kind enough to give me a little lesson on flash
second curtain sync? I know it can be used for making light trails
appear behind a vehicle rather than in front
On Sep 2, 2005, at 6:46 AM, Paul Moortgat wrote:
Is the new Speedlite 580 flash so-much better that the 550?
I've the feeling that my 550 is not always constant. Some picture (in
the same situation) get more light than others.
I have both flashes, and to me the 580 is a real improvement in
I would too, as I own a 1Ds, (not the Mk II). I really would not think
there would be much difference between the two, but it sure seems Canon
is doing everything in it's power to make the original 1Ds seem
obsolete. Mine serves me well, and I have no plans to upgrade until
the next version of
Sandisk now has an 8 GB CF card available. This would sure be handy for
me when shooting weddings with my 1Ds. I always shoot RAW, so it would
save me having to be changing out cards two or three times during the
event. I currently use 2 GB card.
Does anyone know if the 8 GB card will work in
Just got the Canon SD400. I'm really surprised at what this LITTLE
camera can do! It's amazing how liberating it is to be able to always
have a camera with you that can take REALLY good photos. The big SLRs
are great, but I'm not walking around all the time with my 1Ds. There
is a LOT to be
I have a shoot coming up in May of a retired couple. Most of the shots
will be of the lady and her flower garden. I would really appreciate
any creative ideas along these lines. I will do my best to time it NOT
at mid-day! Other than a close up of her cupping a flower in her hands,
I seem lost
This is a sweet looking little camera for a carry along when you just
don't want to lug around a big SLR.
Steve
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0504/05042201canons2is.asp
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
Hello all, Steve here again, the original poster on this topic. This
will probably be my last post on the matter because I know people get
tired of the same old same old. I will just conclude with some more of
my tests and opinion.
I do have two 550 EX flashes, and the problem is there with
Hi all,
I am the one who first posted about the flash light problem when the
flash is mounted on a bracket.
Sorry if I did not post enough equipment details the first time. Camera
is a 1Ds (full frame 35mm aspect ratio), flash 550EX, lens 24 - 70 L,
and Canon sync cord 2.
One poster mentioned
I can't speak for the 10D - 20D, but I did shoot with a D60 for about 2
years, and I CAN speak for it's image quality. You would not be
disappointed with a good used model. It does have a somewhat cheap
feel to it with the creaky, plastic body, but mine never gave me any
problems, and I always
Has anyone tried ordering from B H after the fire? There is no
mention of it or delays on the BH website. I would think it would have
had *some* impact on their business and stock supplies???
Steve
*
***
***
* For list
I formerly used Phase One LE RAW conversion software with my old Canon
D60, but since moving to the 1Ds, I have been using Photo Shop CS raw
conversion exclusively. I always thought the Phase One conversion gave
great results with the D60. Maybe it is my imagination, but looking
back on some
On Amazon there is a seller called Awesome Discount selling the 1ds
Mark II for $4390. Bank transfer or cashier check only yeah sure...
Location is in Cloquet, Mn. Anyone near that area? I wonder how they
would respond to the idea of seeing the camera IN PERSON, *then*
writing a
I just bought a new Canon i9900 printer, went to set it up, and the
printer head carriage will not budge, will NOT move over to the center
to load the printhead and inks. G.. I called Canon,
and to their credit, they are shipping me a new one that should be here
Friday. It is
On Dec 6, 2004, at 8:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you know, I don't understand why canon does not provide a crop image
for the usual masks. If they can pull off eye focus, I would image
they could handle 11x14/8x10/5x7 or a4 etc. Would be nice, wouldnt
it.
dave
It wouldn't be nice, it
On Dec 5, 2004, at 12:48 PM, bud kuenzli wrote:
On Dec 5, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Robert M. wrote:
snip
I second this. I currently use a 1Ds, and would love to know if the
new 1Ds Mk II is really *that* much better. I am in the beginning
stages of a studio and on location portrait business, and so
On Dec 5, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Robert M. wrote:
Dear All,
I am somewhat astonished that the new 1Ds Mk2 has not been mentioned
on this
list at all... or did I miss it? In any case, does anybody own or has
tested
the new camera and if so what do you think about it? Not that I could
afford
it but I
Thanks Bud and Ken for the help. I *thought* that was what I needed,
but was not sure. :-)
Steve
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
I want to mount my 550 EX flash on a bracket that will allow me to
rotate the flash to keep it above the camera when the camera is in the
vertical position. I'm just not sure what connecting cord / adaptor I
need. Is there ONE Canon part number item that will allow this to be
done, or do I
I've always been happy with the results of the Lumiquest products. The
Big Bounce unit combines both a self contained bounce and softening of
the light. The 80 / 20 unit gives beautiful results in areas where you
have a good ceiling for bouncing. The Omnibounce eats up so much flash
output
Just wondering, does anyone know if PhotoShop CS will work with the RAW
files from the new 1Ds MkII. I REALLY like the conversion process PS CS
uses for my current 1Ds and hope Canon has made no changes in their RAW
format with the new camera. Still not sure if I am going spend the
bucks for
I would like to know what other 1Ds users set the color matrix at? I
have kept mine on 1, but since I use Adobe RGB 1998 in PS CS, would it
be best to set my camera to the number 4 matrix setting (Adobe RGB)?
Thanks,
Steve
*
***
I agree that the noise problem is something that hopefully Canon will
fix on the next 1Ds. I will say though, that the noise looks much worse
on the computer screen than it does in final print. I use just basic
noise reduction methods in PS CS and can get acceptable prints even at
higher ISOs.
- Original Message -
From: Singh, Sarbjit (S.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:30 AM
Subject: EOS Perplexed !
A few months ago I had posted questions about an underexposing A2E
camera body. With the help of the usual suspects I was able to improve
I recently bought a 1Ds. Today for the first time I tried downloading some
test shots into the computer. I use a card reader. I have NOT loaded any of
the software that came with the 1Ds. I have never had to with any digital
camera. I simply load the photos into the computer with the card
- Original Message -
From: Robert Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: EOS 1Ds HELP !!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Parrott
I recently bought a 1Ds
- Original Message -
From: Javier Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: EOS 1Ds for $1900 new
A couple of points
Electronic equipment, including 1dses
Has a much higher mortality rate in the first
few months than later on.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Norby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: D30 vs EOS 5 AF performance
I'm thinking that it
it might be better to ask for our good old Nikon 990 back.
Lol... that is exactly what I keep in my car
- Original Message -
From: Henry Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 1:38 PM
Subject: EOS Re: Powering OFF external flash
At 09:13 PM 6/2/2004 +0200, EOS-Digest wrote:
That matches what I've been told, since the late '60s
or early '70s. And
Yeah, sounds too good to be true to me too, but it's there at Amazon. It is
a new seller, with no ratings or comments. Amazon does state they have a
safe buying guarantee, (up to $2500), but I still worry about a NEW 1Ds for
$1900. There *has* to be a gimmick there somewhere. More than likely my
I use a 550 EX, and from somewhere in the distant past, I recall reading or
hearing that it is best to fire a flash unit, then IMMEDIATELY turn it off,
rather than turning it off while fully powered up. Something about it is
better for the internal electrics of the flash, or something along those
I ordered the lens from Amazon on Saturday, May 29th. According to the
automated order info I received, the lens is supposed to ship on June 4th. I
will not likely use it on my D60 however, I will keep it to use with my
future 1Ds.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Warren Marts [EMAIL
I'm nearing the point when I will be ready to buy a 1Ds, but as sure as I
do, Canon will come out with an updated model that will be superior to the
current model. Any opinions on when this model will be improved? I can't
remember when it was first introduced, but the way the digital camera world
- Original Message -
From: Jim Davis Nature Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: NEW QUESTION, formerly Does this printer exist? (no EOS
content)
Steve Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/replied to:
I use a card reader
Take a look at this link! Weird, but some REALLY good PS work. *Somebody*
has LOTS of time on their hands! :-)
Steve
http://www.olympictrans.ru/fun/img/uglyZoo/
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*
On 10 Apr 2004 at 15:17, Steve Parrott wrote:
Is there such a thing as a STAND ALONE photo printer that will accept CD
media?
but also one with CD-R/RW reader *and* writer, the Sony DPP-SV88
printer
Thanks William, I have been doing a lot of searching and found the Sony SV
88
- Original Message -
From: Jim Davis Nature Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Does this printer exist? (no EOS content)
Willem-Jan Markerink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/replied to:
Is there such a thing as a STAND
Is there such a thing as a STAND ALONE photo printer that will accept CD
media? There are plenty that take camera memory cards, but they are of no
use to me. I shoot in RAW, and even if I shot in JPEG, I would still want to
run the photos through PS before printing. It would be WONDERFUL to be
Not sure if this will help, but on my D60 I keep white balance set to Auto,
and when using 550 EX flash, set the camera to F8 at 125. I then use the
flash white balance in Capture One, and do any further color tweaking in PS.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Massip [EMAIL
Ken,
I've been a D60 user since soon after the introduction of the camera.
Overall, I am very pleased with it, and will only replace it with something
of the caliber of a 1Ds, which is NOT financially feaseable now.
I will say I went through a learning curve with my D60, but can now get VERY
- Original Message -
From: Bob Brobst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: EOS Photo size weirdness (was 8 x 12 photo paper)
- Original Message -
From: Steve Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
I'm hoping someone can clue me in on what happens to photo ratio sizes as
you increase photo size. This has always puzzled me. WHY does the width /
height ratio change instead of remaining the same regardless of size?
Here are examples of what I mean. These are the exact size numbers that come
- Original Message -
From: Henning Wulff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: EOS Photo size weirdness (was 8 x 12 photo paper)
At 10:35 AM -0600 3/24/04, Steve Parrott wrote:
I'm hoping someone can clue me in on what happens
- Original Message -
From: Lars Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: EOS Photo size weirdness (was 8 x 12 photo paper)
3 x 2.057 = .943 difference
4 x 2.742 = 1.258 difference
5 x 3.428 = 1.572 difference
6 x
A few days ago discussion came up about finding photo paper in 8 x 12 size.
True, you can't, but it *can* be created. If your printer only supports a
maximum size of the typical 8 1/2 x 11 sheet, then you can purchase 11 x 17
inch photo paper and cut the width down to 8 1/2. You can cut the
I'll share a few random thoughts about the digital vs film thing as it
applys to *ME*, your milage may certainly vary!
I actually spend MUCH more time using digital than I ever did with film.
With film I simply shot, dropped off the film, and later picked up prints.
Simple and quick, . but
Rune,
I have a D60, but have no experience with the new Rebel. From all I have
heard, the Rebel is short on many features of the D60 / D10 cameras. I have
been quite happy with my D60, though low light focus performance leaves
something to be desired.
Here are reviews on the D60 and the Rebel.
I have been very pleased with the cards made by Ritek, the RiData. They are
FAST, and less expensive than the big names. You can order here:
http://www.mypcmax.com/
Steve
- Original Message -
From: FotoCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 6:06
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: EOS 28 - 135 IS USM lens for sale
Steve Parrott wrote:
I have an EXCELLANT A++ condition 28 - 135 IS USM lens for sale. This
lens
is perfect, no scratches
I have an EXCELLANT A++ condition 28 - 135 IS USM lens for sale. This lens
is perfect, no scratches or abrasions on lens or glass. I have just
switched to an L lens, that is the only reason I am selling this one. Also
to go along with it are the following:
Canon lens hood
1A filter
UV filter
I feel your pain Bob. I certainly get better results with digital, but I
sure spend LOTS more time working on pics than I ever did with film. With
film it was a simple matter of shoot, drop off film, pick up pics later.
But of course, more often than not, there would be lots of throw aways. So
Wow... where did *this* come from all of a sudden? or have I just had my
head in the sand? I don't remember hearing anything about a 300D until now
that it seems to be a reality.
What does this do to the 10D? Is the 300D supposed to replace it in the
Canon lineup, or will both cameras be
The whole signing thing is a ROYAL PITA for me with either UPS or Fed Ex. I
am never here when they come and it always involves having to make a special
trip to their depot to pick up the package. There is one good way around
the problem though. There are many places, usually with names like
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
