ctrons, positrons and
entrons. My book is Tronnies, The Source of the Coulomb Force. It is
available at amazon.com.
John Ross
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Bang. My guess is that the 12b sun Black
Hole is the Black Hole in one of those surviving galaxies from our predecessor
universe. See Chapter XXV, “Life and Death of Universes” of my book Tronnies –
The Source of the Coulomb Force available at Amazon.com.
John Ross
From: everything
or the proton in the neutron combines with the three protons to produce an
additional (the 59th)alpha particle in U-236. The electron in the neutron
becomes the 28th electron in the U-236 isotope. U-236 has a half-life of 2.342
X 107 years and decays with an alpha particle.
John Ross
From
Bruce,
No one can logically doubt the following: BEFORE THERE WAS ANYTHING THERE WAS
NOTHING
Let's start with that and explain how we now live in a universe with 100 to 400
billion galaxies.
You propose a background space-time. Where did this background space-time
come from? Who created
, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Liz,
You and your acronyms! I looked up “IMHO” Google says most of the time when
people use the phrase their opinion in not humble. I could not find a
definition for “LOP” that made sense as you used it.
According to my TOE as explained at pages
Liz,
Before there was anything that was nothing – empty space. During this period
there could be no events, so time has no relevance. At some point portions of
nothing separated into two parts, in each case producing a plus tronnie and a
minus tronnie, each being a point particle with no
not include any gamma ray entrons).
Most nuclei include electrons (up to 28) and nuclei with spin may include up to
three protons. There are no neutrons in stable nuclei.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent
-18 m.
Tronnies are described in my book, Tronnies – The Source of the Coulomb Force
available at Amason.com.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:26 PM
To: everything-list
they be not there? But, all these
ideas of getting something from nothing are on the right track, I think. And,
at least you've made some testable predictions. That's the key for all of us,
IMHO.
Roger
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 3:52:38 PM UTC-5, John Ross wrote:
Roger
the integration around the circle.
I invite you to revise your article to make it consistent with my model.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 8:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Isn't
it or even looked at my 101
predictions to determine which ones you agree with and disagree with.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 2:14 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re
Tell him to read my book, Tronnies, The Source of the Coulomb Force,
available at Amazon.com.
First a quick summary of how our Universe operates:
Tronnies are point particles with a charge of plus e or minus e, and the
point focus of Coulomb force waves. Tronnies have no mass and no
Good to hear from you Liz.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 6:00 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Do they or don't they exist? Is anyone familiar
of the Coulomb Force, Available at Amazon .com).
There is no such thing as a singularity (see Chapter XXV, Life and Death of
Universes.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:42 PM
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: The Higgs and SUSY vs the Multiverse
On 23 July 2014 12:07, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Tronnies do not form protons. Tronnies form only entrons (two tronnies),
electrons (three tronnies) and positrons (three tronnies).
Protons are comprised of a very
have the answer to Mercury’s path and the Bose-Einstein stuff but I am
certain that my model will provide a simple explanation. Do you have any
reason to believe that it doesn’t?
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 4:13 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: The Higgs and SUSY vs the Multiverse
On 23 July 2014 05:15, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Symmetry
Every proton contains one electron and two
: TRONNIES - SPACE
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:47 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
What is you answer as to what is beyond our Universe if it is not a shell?
The universe is not a shell. Rather it is a toroid that turns in on itself such
that radiation can go around
the speed of
light. The Monster Black Hole will explode in a Big Bang and the last
remaining Black Holes will pass through the site of the Big Bang to produce the
inflation of the successor universe.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list
?
-Original Message-
From: John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: 24-Jun-2014 17:21:46 +
Subject: RE: TRONNIES - SPACE
The shell is mostly an approximately equal number of very cold electrons and
positrons, all traveling randomly at 2.19 X
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 25 June 2014 09:22, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
The shell is mostly an approximately equal number of very cold electrons and
positrons, all traveling randomly at 2.19 X 106 m/s. They are going too fast
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 3:25 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 25 June 2014 05:07, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
“So what”. My point is you cannot prove Einstein’s
: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 25 June 2014 04:48, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
The light reflected by the shell of our Universe is the cosmic background
radiation that has been bouncing around our Universe since the Big Bang. Radio
wave radiation generated in our Universe reflects from
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 26 June 2014 11:07, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Your guess is as good as mine as to what’s beyond the shell. The shell may be
very thick and many universes could be combined in the shell like bubbles in a
Pepsi.
Well, I'm afraid
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 3:05 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 24 June 2014 09:15, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I don’t believe there are extra dimensions in our
is enormously simpler than Albert’s.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 3:03 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 24 June 2014 08:55, John Ross
, June 24, 2014 11:34 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
So what is this photon reflector shell made from? Why wouldn't it absorb rather
than reflect.
-Original Message-
From: John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com
To: everything-list everything
I agree that clock’s operate at different rates as space vehicles and high
speed aircraft approach the speed of light or are located at different
gravitational levels, but that does not prove that time passes at different
rates.
Would a faraway galaxy compute the time since the Big Bang as
All of the GPS satellites know exactly where they are relative to some position
here on earth. They are all in communication with each other and they know how
fast a radio beam travels. It would be a simple matter to regularly adjust
their clock speeds so all of the clocks operate at the same
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 24 June 2014 06:08, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I agree that clock’s operate at different rates as space vehicles and high
speed aircraft approach the speed of light or are located at different
gravitational levels
: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 9 June 2014 06:50, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Liz,
I try to respond to all of your points. In some cases I don’t understand your
points. What is RM? And I don’t understand primitive materialism.
Not understanding is the worst reason
I’ll have to think about this also.
JR
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 3:16 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 9 June 2014 06:33, John Ross jr
On 9 June 2014 06:19, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Tronnies are each a point focus of Coulomb forces.
Are you saying tronnies aren't particles, but excitations of this Coulomb
field? Actually this implies that only the field exists, tronnies are just a
convenient way
You are correct about our Universe. It is not infinite. It has a shell around
it. However we don’t know what is beyond the shell. There probability an
infinity of space beyond our shell.
JR
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2014 4:36 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 8 June 2014 07:39, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Thanks for your serious questions. The answers are simple.
· There is no “strong force
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 8:27 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:36 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Neutrons have a lifetime of about 15 minutes
Yes, but only when
, at 22:18, John Ross wrote:
I do not explain consciousness.
Fair enough. You are not searching to explain everything. Unfortunately,
consciousness has something to say on the very origin of the beliefs in the
physical laws. You are still an Aristotelian theologian (taking matter
: Saturday, June 07, 2014 7:03 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 11:44:06AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
I have not tried Physics Review. I did try The Journal Nature and Scientific
American about 10 years ago without success. I follow
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2014 4:38 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 8 June 2014 08:18, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I do not explain consciousness.
OK, but why won't you answer ALL my questions? Every
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2014 9:27 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:00 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
3 alpha particles
... :-)
Plus there are just odd hints that to my uneducated perception appear to almost
make sense. But I really should kick the habit and get back to trying to
understand something sensible like comp.
To be quite honest, John Ross is trying to convince the wrong guys. He
should be trying
of lepton
number conservation, but I really don't feel it is my duty to thoroughly
debunk the Ross model.
To be quite honest, John Ross is trying to convince the wrong guys. He
should be trying to convince someone at the Perimeter institute perhaps, or
even the editor of a journal like Phys Rev might
: Friday, June 06, 2014 9:05 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 6/6/2014 7:54 PM, LizR wrote:
On 7 June 2014 14:00, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
If you had a copy of my book you would see that the center portion of the
alpha is comprised
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 7 June 2014 14:00, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
If you think back in time long enough before there was anything anywhere you
get to a point in time when there was nothing. Somehow nothing turned into
something and that something
, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Everybody is free to take it or leave it. However, I promise you that the
integrated forces in the entron exactly cancel in the diametrical direction.
Is this a classical system (with continuous forces and so on) ? If so, how
does it stand up
I do not explain consciousness.
Jr
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 6:02 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 7 June 2014 04:12, John Ross jr
There is a theory of everything – my theory, “The Ross Model”. You are a smart
person and you are extremely interested in this subject, so sooner or later you
will get around to reading my book. And I predict you will be forced to agree
with me.
John Ross
From: everything-list
: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 5 June 2014 14:11, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
It is very unlikely that we are at the center of our Universe. You need to
read about integrating spheres. And you need to read Chapter XXII,“THE COLD
PLASMA SHELL OF OUR UNIVERSE”.
Could you explain in a few
June 2014 13:39, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
My theory predicts anti-particles and explains the internal structure of the
basic particles, electrons, positrons and entrons. Your’s do not.
The standard model does all that, too.
The only force in the Universe is the Coulomb
Everybody is free to take it or leave it. However, I promise you that the
integrated forces in the entron exactly cancel in the diametrical direction.
So entrons can be stable for billions of years. Entrons represent all of
the mass of our Universe except for the mass or electrons and positrons
will change your mind. But who
knows for sure.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:00 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On Tue, Jun 3
- SPACE
On 4 June 2014 11:41, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
We are not at the center of the universe, at least I have no reason to believe
we are.
That is the implication of the universe being surrounded by a shell of
particles that appears to be equidistant from us in all
, 2014 10:49 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:04 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
It looks like we are fairly close on time but not on space.
Space and time can not be considered separately
We are not at the center of the universe, at least I have no reason to believe
we are.
The shell in not the CMBR. It is mostly cold electrons and positron traveling
at their natural speed of about 2.19 X 106 m/s.
The photon pressure is very uneven. For galaxies at the center of our
, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I don’t believe in virtual photons.
So how do you explain the Casimir effect, which so far can only be explained
using virtual photons?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 6:29 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 3 June 2014 13:12, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Space doesn’t keep things apart.
What
masses can definitely produce a curvature in the mass’s Coulomb grid.
So if we define “space” as Coulomb grids, then my model may not be much
different than general relativity
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John
-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 4:08 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES - SPACE
On 3 June 2014 05:04, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
John Clark,
Thanks for your May 30 post
continuing to use it in the first, uncontentious sense, where
it's merely a qualifier, but being more careful how you phrase things when
you're making what most people consider a outrageous claim.
On 29 May 2014 12:51, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
There are an equal number
minutes (whether it is inside
or outside nuclei).
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:28 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 28 May 2014 12:03, John
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:49 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 29 May 2014 03:55, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Good thinking.
However, if charge is spread evenly over a sphere, parts
Amazing!
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 2:34 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 27 May 2014 05:56, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote
May 2014 02:44, John Clark johnk...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
And you think rusty high school algebra is all you need to revolutionize
physics and win a Nobel Prize. Does anyone around here STILL think John Ross is
not a crackpot?
Blessed are the cracked, for they let in the light
27, 2014 2:51 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
2014-05-27 23:46 GMT+02:00 John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com:
Thank you, whoever it was that wrote the long paragraph. It reminds me of the
only lawyer joke that I can remember. “Why do they bury Lawyers 8
-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 3:55 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 25 May 2014 04:36, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
What I believe is that time does not slow down when
the half-life of
free neutrons in motion?
Brent
On 5/24/2014 9:36 AM, John Ross wrote:
What I believe is that time does not slow down when you go fast.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, May 23
What I believe is that time does not slow down when you go fast.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 7:06 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 23
The answer to these questions are all provided in my book. If you would like a
free copy just send me your address. Or call and leave it on my voice
recorder. (858-646-5488).
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of ghib
Coulomb’s Law applies to static charges. In this case the charge is not
stationary. It is traveling in a circle at pi/2 times c. The Coulomb force
has to be integrated around the circle. The integrated force ends up with
energy/mass units.
John Ross
From: everything-list
On 23 May 2014 12:24, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Yes, I have thought about the muon experiments. I will have to work on this
issue some more. I just do not believe time passes more slowly when you go
fast. I think there must be another explanation of why so many muons make
, John Ross wrote:
No one knows anything about entrons except people that have read what I have
written.
You'll see plenty about time dilation though.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 5/22/2014 5:58 PM, John Ross wrote:
I tried and tried to make the entron work using F = kQQ/r2 but it just wouldn’t
work. I must have worked on it for several months. One day I tried F = kQQ/r
and the forces balanced to a thousand decimal places. I showed one of my
My book is an easy read and I will send one a free one.
John R
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:35 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:04 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 22 May 2014 11:31, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
No I haven’t done any math regarding perturbations. I believe tronnies
as they approach c, exactly as predicted by special
relativity, which is in turn based on the assumption that nothing can move
faster than light.
On 22 May 2014 12:08, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Tronnies travel at about 1.57c as a result of its circular path while being
repulsed by its own
, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
You are absolutely correct each tronnies looks across the diameter of his
circle and sees himself of the other side of the circle. He also sees his
partner at an angle of 53.515 degrees from the diameter, quite a bit closer.
I don’t remember
The reason why the proton is about 1836 times as massive as the electron is
because the proton in its natural state is comprised of an electron (that has
captured the neutrino entron portion of a neutrino photon,which has a mass of
1.65 X 10-27 kg) plus two positrons. The nucleus of hydrogen
, 2014 3:20 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 23 May 2014 10:16, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/22/2014 3:09 PM, LizR wrote:
On 23 May 2014 02:39, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I believe the particles are driven by high voltage which means
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:14 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 23 May 2014 02:55, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
The tronnie is a point focus of Coulomb force waves
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:09 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 23 May 2014 02:39, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I believe the particles are driven by high voltage which means
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 1:00 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
My theory describes the internal structure of electrons
First explain why
: TRONNIES
On 23 May 2014 11:53, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
No one knows anything about entrons except people that have read what I have
written. So you won’t see anything about them in the “popular” literature.
(Although earlier this week I sent a copy of my book to Scientific
classical, in
which case my next question is how does it avoid instability? Or is it
quantised, and in its ground state? (in which case I agree that there is no
energy to radiate).
On 21 May 2014 13:09, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
My understanding is that positronium is an electron
There was not a single thought experiment that led to my theory. The
development of my theory was in general a lot of individual ideas most of which
led to dead ends. Remember what we have now is Version 8, and I have been
working on this thing for more than 13 years. There are a huge number
No I haven’t done any math regarding perturbations. I believe tronnies in
general (maybe always) travel in perfect circles so there are no perturbations.
This probably also applies to electrons and positrons. There are
perturbations in atoms and perturbations in atomic nuclei and radiation
Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:00:48AM -0700, John Ross wrote:
The tronnie
Tronnies travel at about 1.57c as a result of its circular path while being
repulsed by its own Coulomb force that travels at a speed of c. A surfer
travels at the speed of the wave only if he is coming straight into shore. If
he is traveling at an angle he goes faster than the wave.
You are absolutely correct each tronnies looks across the diameter of his
circle and sees himself of the other side of the circle. He also sees his
partner at an angle of 53.515 degrees from the diameter, quite a bit closer.
I don’t remember the episode you are thinking about, but clearly
the intellectual development of
the theory as though you went straight to the final version, i.e. without
needing to revisit the dead ends.
On 22 May 2014 11:01, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
There was not a single thought experiment that led to my theory. The
development
2014 11:17, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I don’t smoke, but I did not expect a cigar anyway.
I believe Chapter I is a fair assessment of current scientific thinking. (If I
honestly believe something but am not certain of, I believe use of the phrase
“I believe “ is appropriate
?
On 21 May 2014 04:13, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I look forward to your comments each day. And I try to respond the best I can.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:37 PM
Well said!!!
John R
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Telmo Menezes
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:44 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:27 PM, John Ross jr
: TRONNIES
On Sun, May 18, 2014 John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I plan to save your e-mails and maybe I will read some of them to the
audience if and when it turns out that I am correct and am awarded the Nobel
prize in Physics.
Wow what a honor, my humble words read
I don’t smoke, but I did not expect a cigar anyway.
I believe Chapter I is a fair assessment of current scientific thinking. (If I
honestly believe something but am not certain of, I believe use of the phrase
“I believe “ is appropriate.) Many scientist are skeptical of many features of
, not existing
theories.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:02 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:27 PM, John Ross jr
: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 4:01 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 18 May 2014 07:38, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
I believe there is a need for my model because
would.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:31 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:35 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote
it, I
suggest you give it to your son. If you do so, warn him that his professors
probably are great supporters of the standard model and relativity. Also see
my response to John Clark.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
chapter describes tronnies.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 3:18 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 18 May 2014 07:27, John Ross jr
” and if it is not what is it?
JR
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 16 May 2014 06:54, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
