On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
meekerdb wrote:
On 5/15/2015 10:29 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bruce Kellett
bhkell...@optusnet.com.au mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Bruce
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:07 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 21:30, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Clouds, especially high clouds have some effect. They reflect visible
bands back to space and they also absorb and reemit IR. Low clouds tend to
increase
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:21 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 May 2015 at 21:38, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:07 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 21:30, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Clouds, especially high
/articles/the-honor-of-being-mugged-by-climate-censors-1431558936
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, May 15, 2015 07:52 AM
Subject: Re: Michael Shermer becomes sceptical
with this unseen WSJ article. I will send a site link which will show the
full article.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, May 15, 2015 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: Michael
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:27 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/15/2015 2:38 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:07 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 21:30, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Clouds, especially high clouds have
Clouds, especially high clouds have some effect. They reflect visible
bands back to space and they also absorb and reemit IR. Low clouds tend to
increase heat load because they reflect in the day, but they insulate day
and night. It's not magic, it's just calculation.
Of course, I am
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:20 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/12/2015 7:02 PM, LizR wrote:
Brent, that link doesn't work for me - did you miss something off the end?
Oops! Shoulda been:
I disagree. I think this criticisms comes from a misinterpretation of what
the p-value means. The p-value estimates the probability of seeing results
at least as helpful to the hypothesis as the ones found, assuming the null
hypothesis. A high p-value is informative because it tells us that
With climate change and cures for cancer you need statistics, because
there are no such laws in these fields. There is no equation where you can
plug-in a CO2 concentration and get a correct prediction on global
temperature change.
There's a law where you can plug in atmospheric
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:55 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe satellites and weather stations give a lot of samples of
atmospheric temperature (and other properties, I assume).
Yes, I am not questioning these readings. I believe that 2010 was warmer
than any year in the previous
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:47 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
So all these hottest years on record we keep getting are made up?
Just curious.
Admittedly this is from 2010, maybe the trend has reversed in last 5 years?
How long is the record? What is the p-value for the hypothesis of
In the scenario we present here, measuring the last photon
affects the physical description of the first photon
in the past, before it has even been measured. Thus,
the ”spooky action” is steering the system’s past.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.4191v1.pdf
--
You received this message because you
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 May 2015, at 08:41, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2015-05-06 3:51 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 5/5/2015 5:34 PM, LizR wrote:
On 5 May 2015 at 11:12, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Where
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-06 3:51 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 5/5/2015 5:34 PM, LizR wrote:
On 5 May 2015 at 11:12, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Where does the money go once it's bought votes?
It's
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:12 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 5/4/2015 2:54 PM, LizR wrote:
On 5 May 2015 at 00:12, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:03 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, very. I haven't read the paper yet but I hope when
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 04 May 2015, at 10:23, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:08 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2015 at 06:45, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Of course believing
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:59 PM, PGC multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 4:03:50 PM UTC+2, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Alberto G. Corona agoc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Of course believing in the supernatural is absurd -- what does that even
mean?
distinction is between communicable and
non-communicable stuff. Science is about communicable stuff, but there is
personal value in exploring the internal world -- although it won't get you
a nobel prize or even any sort of recognition.
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes te
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Dennis Ochei do.infinit...@gmail.com wrot
What are the terms for it? We have up/down left/right forward/backward
??/?? ?
I don't think there's a name for that, but here's a nice game in 4D:
http://miegakure.com/
They project 4D to 3D and let you
this?
Have you seen this?
http://multiverseaccordingtoben.blogspot.de/2015/03/paranormal-phenomena-nonlocal-mind-and.html
Telmo.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, May 3, 2015 2:45 pm
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:08 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 May 2015 at 06:45, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Of course believing in the supernatural is absurd -- what does that even
mean? If, for example, ghosts were real, then this would just mean that
current
Interesting idea:
http://ericposner.com/quadratic-voting/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
equality you get. The author proposes a
mathematical proof that such a system would stabilize on an equal
distribution of political power.
Of course, there are many real world details that could make this idea fail
miserably, but it's fun to think about.
On 4 May 2015 at 20:50, Telmo Menezes te
a nobel prize or even any sort of recognition.
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, May 4, 2015 4:19 am
Subject: Re: Michael Shermer becomes sceptical about scepticism!
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Of course believing in the supernatural is absurd -- what does that even
mean? If, for example, ghosts were real, then this would just mean that
current scientific theories are incomplete or wrong.
So what?
No
Interesting idea:
http://ericposner.com/quadratic-voting/
I see it's claimed to be more efficient and I can certainly see that. It
will allow the Koch brothers to directly buy the laws they want without
having to buy Congressmen.
That is better, no? It means that their money is
Hi spudboy,
I follow Ben Goetzel and have some of the books he recommends on the topic
on my to-read list.
I remain agnostic on this stuff, and just try to consider the simplest
explanation, even if it's boring. In the case of this story, this sounds a
lot like the event was staged by some nice
Ok, but you could equally say that all the universe does is attain the
state of heat death, or that all a person does is end up dead. You are
choosing to ignore the intermediate steps as unimportant, because you know
the ultimate outcome.
My point is that the intermediate steps are just
If you think that blacks did ok under slavery, and didn't perish hugely,
you must be living in fantasy land. I am about as rightwing as one can get
on this mailing list. But I am not fibbing in order to cleanse the facts of
human history. While, I am at it, The Spaniards and Portuguese
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Bruce seems to ignore the (mind-body) problem, and to miss that the UDA
just helps to make that problem more precise, in the frame of
computationalism, and to make it more amenable to more
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 24 Apr 2015, at 02:30, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:19 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
You should both go to jail, on the basis that both copies of you had the
same consciousness as the person
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:48 PM, PGC multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 24, 2015 at 5:55:46 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Apr 2015, at 02:30, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:19 AM, LizR liz...@gmail.com wrote:
You should both go to jail
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Dennis Ochei wrote:
One must revise the everyday concept
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
The amazing thing is how what would happen in 100 trillion years may
preoccupy so seriously to some people that would induce to suicide.
Boltzman committed suicide in part because his own theories of
termodinamical
My suspicion is that personal identity is a human concept that is evolved
mainly to enforce social norms, and that it only works until technologies
like duplication machines or mind uploading are created. To illustrate
this, I propose a dilemma:
Let's assume I murder someone and then get scanned
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:19 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
You should both go to jail, on the basis that both copies of you had the
same consciousness as the person who committed the murder, and therefore
you are both equally responsible (leaving aside considerations of free will
etc)
I
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Dennis Ochei wrote:
One must revise the everyday concept of personal identity because it
isn't even coherent. It's like youre getting mad at him for explaining
combustion without reference to phlogiston. He can't
@googlegroups.com wrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Telmo Menezes
*Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 12:22 AM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Food for thought
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 6:36 AM, meekerdb
Current global growth estimates are that every two days, the world is now
creating as much new digital information as all the data ever created from
the dawn of humans through the current century. It has been estimated that
by 2020, the size of the world’s digital universe will be close to
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 6:36 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/17/2015 11:56 AM, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
Current global growth estimates are that every two days, the world is
now creating as much new digital information as all the data ever created
from
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
LizR wrote:
On 15 April 2015 at 10:15, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com mailto:
johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but I'm confused, I though you were the one arguing that Bruno
had discovered something new
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
LizR wrote:
On 15 April 2015 at 10:15, John Clark johnkcl
My problem with any view based on entropy is that entropy doesn't appear
to be fundamental to physics; it is the statistically likely result when
objects are put in a certain configuration and allowed to evolve randomly.
There is, however, an interesting parallel to be made with Shannon's
Hi Liz,
Ok. I have an idea about that, it is probably not original. Tell me what
you think:
The universe was not created. All possible states just exist. The moment
of the big bang is one of the many possible states. What we call the past
is a sequence of steps in the state graph that are
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 12:44 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 , Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
I have this crazy idea to remove the supposed ambiguity: ask a specific
Telmo if his prediction was correct or not.
If Telmo were logical
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:16 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/13/2015 7:39 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Comp does not specify a substitution level. Maybe it's the brain, maybe
the whole body or the entire planet. The duplication machines assume the
body, but then this restriction
:
2015-04-13 19:50 GMT+02:00 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Telmo
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com mailto:
te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
And now that I have answered you question I repeat my question
that you dodged
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 05:31, Bruce Kellett wrote:
The philosophical literature is full of extended discussions on this,
and it is widely understood that ideas such as brain transplants and
Thanks Telmo. I have looked only to the 1/3 video.
I am shocked myself by my accent, and I have discovered that I do oral
typos now ...
I hate listening to my own voice recorded, I believe that's very common.
I think it's easy to understand and gives you character. I have worked with
many
Hi everyone,
Mysteriously, I came across the videos of a very recent talk by Bruno
entitled Mathematical Self-Reproduction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATl86jBfwqI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76iuXcVOAuc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5etar0vQYnI
Bruno, hope you don't mind me posting
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:43 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
And now that I have answered you question I repeat my question that you
dodged: Who is traveling through time in a forward direction, Mr. John
Clark
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:40 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Who is traveling through time in a forward direction, Mr. John Clark
or Mr. John Clark The Helsinki Man?
Have you ever met
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:42 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Brent:
Communism is not a terrible idea - it works fine for families. A lot of
political problems come from trying to extend ethics that evolved for
families and small tribes to nation states of millions of unrelated people.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:10 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2015 at 01:43, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
You left out traveling through time in a forward direction.
Who is traveling through time in a forward direction, Mr. John Clark or
Mr. John Clark
Thanks Brent!
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:20 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
For Telmo.
Brent
Forwarded Message
Thomas Jefferson is credited with the following sage advice, *“The central
bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the
or duplicating machines you have to specify which Telmo
Menezes or which you in the exact same way.
No it is not exactly the same way. With copying machines John Clark can
see 6.02 *10^23 Telmo Menezes running around and has no idea which one is
Mr. You,
They will all believe to be Telmo
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:45 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
It was a totalitarian government, like within a single corporation.
Nothing at all like Marx imagined. Where Marx's idea has been realized is
in the Amana colonies in the US and the kibbutz in Israel. So why didn't
they
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:04 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
If you take the MWI seriously, then you are open to the possibility that
you are constantly being duplicated
If the MWI is true then it's
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/4/2015 6:19 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi John
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
TELMO:
I did not expect from you to point to the 2 centuries old obsolete and
theoretical exercise
.
Best,
Telmo.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:19 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2015 at 15:18, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
In practice
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:42 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
I is a single entity travelling through time in the forward direction.
If matter copying machines exist there would be nothing single about it,
Mr. I
Fast Radios Bursts (FRBs) show large dispersion measures (DMs), suggesting
an extragalactic location. We analyze the DMs of the 11 known FRBs in
detail and identify steps as integer multiples of half the lowest DM found,
187.5cm−3 pc, so that DMs occur in groups centered at 375, 562, 750, 937,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:19 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2015 at 20:50, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:40 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope that isn't an April Fool!
Well, this isn't rocket science...
In 2013, it was more
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:13 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 April 2015 at 19:40, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:19 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 April 2015 at 20:50, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:09 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
As mentioned in another thread, the media have (as it were) blown the
Islamic threat up out of all proportion. Climate change is a FAR greater
threat to civilisation than ISIS will ever be.
That is true. It is also true that ISIS
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:40 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope that isn't an April Fool!
Well, this isn't rocket science...
In 2013, it was more likely Americans would be killed by a toddler than a
terrorist. In that year, three Americans were killed in the Boston Marathon
bombing,
Hi Liz,
Yes, this is quite exciting, more so than Watson or Deep Blue because it
tries to be more generic.
The latest wave of excitement seems to come from Google's Deep Mind. Here's
a paper about it, with some videos you can see even without paying:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-31 12:11 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-03-31 10:37 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:04:10AM -0400, spudboy100 via Everything List
wrote:
Well, its not the new jihadists I blame, but the (yes) leftist
academics, politicians, and news thugs, that have long, empowered, and
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-03-31 10:37 GMT+02:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:04:10AM -0400, spudboy100 via Everything
Hi Liz,
You may be right. I am surely not going to debate that there are a lot of
people who were lucky enough to have been born in optimal conditions and
feel superior to people who were just less lucky. For this reason, they
will support ideas that are just self-serving rationalizations.
The
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 30 Mar 2015, at 11:19 am, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2015 at 08:39, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/29/2015 3:55 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Please! Hunter Gatherers - warriors is a boys
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:04 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2015 at 23:12, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
The characteristics of a gender have been evolved by millions of years of
selection, and women preferences play a role in this selection process.
Not just
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:57 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok... Well now everybody can see you as you really are,
And
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 28 Mar 2015, at 9:12 pm, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Hi Kim,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
wrote:
On 26 Mar 2015, at 2:21 pm, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:39 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/29/2015 3:55 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Please! Hunter Gatherers - warriors is a boys' club term for it.
I can accept that the term warrior glorifies something nasty, but what
term to use? Hunter Gatherer
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 5:41 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Sadly, it's quite clear that Mr Clark has no wish to engage with the
argument being presented. It's fair to say that on this subject, at least,
rather than attempt to understand the point being made, he's resorted to
insults and
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Mindey I. min...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Hi Mindey, welcome.
so, my background: http://mindey.com/42 -- I always wanted to know its
origin precisely.
The understanding of the origin of Universe(=Everything, Multiverse,
and our Life experience
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 5:40 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
You are saying that step 3 is trivial, so you admit that it is correct
No. The first 2 steps are trivialities dressed up in pompous language
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 6:01 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone else worried that the list is descending to a low place?
It's interesting, Quentin The Horse Fucker has been calling me Liar
Clark about
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-28 19:04 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 6:01 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Kim,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
On 26 Mar 2015, at 2:21 pm, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.raqqa-sl.com/en/?p=857
So most of these women are Brits? WTF! Makes your blood run cold. People
are turning into zombies left right and
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:01 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
I don't think anyone claims that the duplicating machines are an analogy
for the MWI.
Quentin The Horse Fucker claims EXACTLY that and even calls me
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:15 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
it will be more than human.
I'm not sure what that means.
It means that a future machine can perform any task in a way that is
superior to way
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:33 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Generally when Watson was wrong he knew he was probably wrong. I find
that significant.
I find that significant too, but this probability
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:15 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
John is inconsistent... he asserts that theory for duplication machines,
and so say that he can never say anything about his future expectations
because he
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:03 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/23/2015 1:24 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:50 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
I said it before I'll say it again
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:52 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
In my opinion the fundamental problem with the Turing Test is that
passing it is an act of deception. The computer has to fake being a human.
Lying
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:23 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
And anyway the really important thing isn't if you can detect if the
thing you're talking to is a human but if you can detect if the thing
you're
-
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Mar 21, 2015 5:24 pm
Subject: Re: TEPCO admits Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 core completely melted
down
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:08 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:50 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
I said it before I'll say it again, only somebody terrified of machine
intelligence would make that argument.
Who is making that argument? Not me. Not
(with Storage) may now be the past of
least resistance.
Fair enough. I don't know either, I just have the impression that a lot of
people who protest nuclear power (and influence political decisions) also
don't know.
Telmo.
-Original Message-
From: Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 21 Mar 2015, at 21:38, Telmo Menezes wrote:
It is the p in []p p, which makes machine's knowledge not definable
in term of number and machine. S4Grz formalizable at a level, what the
machine cannot formalize
-03-23 9:58 GMT+01:00 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 3:48 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
I am saying that I don't know if uranium fission can be made safer, and
cheaper. I also think that part of the cost is waste
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:36 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/20/2015 3:43 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:25 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 March 2015 at 20:57, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
A fundamental difference in science
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 March 2015 at 08:51, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Because I spotted a blunder in the proof about 3 years ago and despite
reams of blather in hundreds of posts you were unable to fix it. Only a
fool would keep
It is the p in []p p, which makes machine's knowledge not definable
in term of number and machine. S4Grz formalizable at a level, what the
machine cannot formalize about herself (but can bet on, ...).
Thanks to incompleteness, the Theaetetus' definition makes sense, and
distinguish the
601 - 700 of 1632 matches
Mail list logo
