m: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-17, 09:02:43
Subject: Re: Wisdom from Calvin Cooldge
On 12/17/2012 8:15 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Craig Weinberg
> If I believe in arithmetic and you don't, should I compromise
> with you ?
> Here is the dilemma:
>
On 12/17/2012 8:15 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
If I believe in arithmetic and you don't, should I compromise
with you ?
Here is the dilemma:
In the long run, liberals will create a better world,
but in the long run, liberals will bring us to bankruptcy.
Is this not a contradic
rever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-16, 00:58:00
Subject: Re: Wisdom from Calvin Cooldge
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:52:53 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote
On 12/16/2012 3:29 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/15/2012 9:43 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If you have a group of people getting rich while other people are in
bondage to them and stay poor, that presents a problem for social
mobility - which is being rea
-
> *From:* Craig Weinberg
> *Receiver:* everything-list
> *Time:* 2012-12-15, 15:51:51
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Wisdom from Calvin Cooldge
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:31:58 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Craig Weinberg
>>
>> Th
-15, 15:51:51
Subject: Re: Re: Wisdom from Calvin Cooldge
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:31:58 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
That's the old guilt argument. It's as old as Robin Hood
and is just as likely to stay with us as it works.
It's funny, I only feel gui
On 12/15/2012 9:43 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If you have a group of people getting rich while other people are in bondage to them
and stay poor, that presents a problem for social mobility - which is being realized
now as the US has fallen beneath s
On 12/16/2012 1:18 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
if you are a black male in America you are six times more likely to go
to prison than a white male - and that this fact is not because white
males don't break the law as much as black males.
No, it is because of the disparity caused by a lack of
On 12/16/2012 1:05 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What is the difference that makes a difference between "being a
victim (of some oppressive action)" and "being at a disadvantage".
The
same outcomes obtain!
It's the framing. Calling someone a victim implicitly frames them as a
los
On 12/16/2012 1:02 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
t's not about how a person acts, it's about where the person is
allowed to act.
Allowed, how? Allowed implies "not-allowed" as well. Please
understand that I am not defending conservatism! I am defending logic
and reason!
What country clubs
On 12/16/2012 12:58 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
What can be said about people in power who oppose compromise with the
other side? Can we say that it is the uncompromising obstructionists
who are causing problems and replace them with people who will not
necessarily vote with their party?
"O
On 12/16/2012 12:55 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:43:42 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> If you have a group of people getting rich while other people
are in
> bondage to them and stay poor, that prese
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:40:58 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> It is well understood that to draw conclusions from a non-faithful
>> sample of a population is to bias any possible prediction. Why are you
>> focusing on some
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:50:08 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > You won't be a victim, but you will be at a disadvantage if you are
> > trying to live and prosper in a Conservative world which focuses on
> > the way things were rath
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:15:28 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Can you answer my question?
>>
>
> Because conservatives generally speak from the perspective of the dominant
> culture.
>
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Are there some oth
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:52:53 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > Why do they always seem to stagnate into polarization?
>
>Because people stop talking to each other honestly and frankly.
>
> > Is that what typically happens?
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 12:43:42 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> > If you have a group of people getting rich while other people are in
> > bondage to them and stay poor, that presents a problem for social
> > mobility - which is being
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Why do they always seem to stagnate into polarization?
Because people stop talking to each other honestly and frankly.
Is that what typically happens?
Yes, so long as one side or both accept that the people that do
not agree with the
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
You won't be a victim, but you will be at a disadvantage if you are
trying to live and prosper in a Conservative world which focuses on
the way things were rather than they way they are now, or could be, or
should be.
Hi Craig,
What is the diff
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If you have a group of people getting rich while other people are in
bondage to them and stay poor, that presents a problem for social
mobility - which is being realized now as the US has fallen beneath
several other countries in social mobility.
H
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
It is well understood that to draw conclusions from a
non-faithful sample of a population is to bias any possible
prediction. Why are you focusing on some partition of some
equivalence class: "white, green, pink, yellow, purple, bl
On 12/15/2012 5:51 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can you answer my question?
Because conservatives generally speak from the perspective of the
dominant culture.
Hi Craig,
Are there some other characteristics of conservatives that
identifies them? Does the particular nature of the cult
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:23:47 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 4:21 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:50:36 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>>
>> On 12/15/2012 2:55 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, December 15, 20
On 12/15/2012 4:21 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:50:36 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 12/15/2012 2:55 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
I beg to differ.
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:50:36 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2012 2:55 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Craig Weinberg
>>
>>
>> I beg to differ.
>>
>> My hero, Calvin Coolidge, the arch con
ver:* everything-list
> *Time:* 2012-12-15, 14:55:57
> *Subject:* Re: Wisdom from Calvin Cooldge
>
>
>
> On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Craig Weinberg
>>
>>
>> I beg to differ.
>>
>> My h
On 12/15/2012 2:55 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
I beg to differ.
My hero, Calvin Coolidge, the arch conservative of all time, once
said,
"Don't just do something.Stand there."
That's great if
content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-15, 14:55:57
Subject: Re: Wisdom from Calvin Cooldge
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
I beg to differ.
My hero, Calvin Coolidge, the arch conservative of all time, onc
On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>
> Hi Craig Weinberg
>
>
> I beg to differ.
>
> My hero, Calvin Coolidge, the arch conservative of all time, once said,
>
> "Don't just do something.Stand there."
>
>
That's great if you are already standing on top
29 matches
Mail list logo