intuition and 1p
Intuition (philosophy), immediate (not inferred) a priori knowledge or
experiential belief
n�tu�i�tion
[in-too-ish-uh?n, -tyoo-]
noun
1.
direct perception of truth, fact, etc., independent of any reasoning process;
immediate apprehension.
2.
a fact, truth, etc.,
Hi Telmo Menezes
Presumably the brain works with analog, not digital, signals.
But the redisplay of the brain image requires a digital image signal.
How can that happen ?
If the recponstructed brain image has no sync signal,
how couold it display in a digital device ?
[Roger Clough],
Hi Telmo Menezes
The electronics presumably requires a digital signal.
But the brain presumably uses analog signals.
And there is the raster line and sync signal problem.
There is the digital pixel problem, which uses only 3 colors: blue,green,red.
How can all of this work ?
[Roger
Hi meekerdb
Picking and choosing can sometimes be incorrect.
When you try to find the meaning of a verse from the Bible,
ideally you should find the meaning from the Bible as a whole.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody
Hi meekerdb
Even bacteria have some miniscule amount of intelligence,
which is IMHO the ability to autonomously make choices.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From:
Hi meekerdb
Mathematical structures such as quantum fields are not in spacetime.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time:
Hi meekerdb
Russell was a brilliant logician, but that's all he was.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time:
On 07 Jan 2013, at 17:26, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Yes, the theories are nonphysical, and in addition, quantum theories
quantum theory applies to quantum fields, which are nonphysical.
This is hard for me to grasp. What do you mean by quantum fields are
not physical?
It seems
Here's Bertrand Russell's view of Leibniz's definition of substance
http://www.ditext.com/russell/leib1.html#3
Every proposition has a subject and a predicate.
A subject may have predicates which are qualities existing at various times.
(Such a subject is called a substance.)
[Roger
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 5:23:55 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Presumably the brain works with analog, not digital, signals.
You are both missing the more important issue - signals cannot be decoded
in the brain. It's tempting to think that is possible because we are
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:47:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is
the long way around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
Brent
It's not hard for me
Hi Bruno Marchal
IMHO It doesn't matter what type of field. According to the definition below,
a field is like a map, it is not the territory itself. .that would
act on a body at any given point in that region The word would
tells us that a field only has potential existence, not
Hi Craig Weinberg
Exactly.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-08, 09:23:56
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Anna,
There is an ongoing discussion over on the google Everything list
about Quantum Suicide, which is nearly equivalent to a coin toss.
QS is proposed as a test of MWI- the Many World Interpretation of quantum
mechanics. In QS it depends essentially on a coin toss if an experimenter
is either
On 07 Jan 2013, at 19:53, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Theism, like atheism, is unprovable.
Why is that? You're saying that even though God is omnipotent He is
incapable of proving His existence to us. I can prove my existence
to you
I
Wave collapse and consciousness
According to the discussion below, a field only has potential
existence, it does not exist by itself. It requires a body to interact with it.
This difference is easily confused in usage. For example, we
may speak of an electromagnetic field as if it is a real
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 1:24:48 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
Even people who have no sense of humor can deduce that other people do
have it,
Would they if only 0.001% of the population had a sense of humor?
Hi John Clark.
God so far has proven his existence to nobody,
unless subjectively (spiritually), primarily because God is
subjective, not objective.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the
Hi Brent,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:33 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/7/2013 5:09 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:56 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/6/2013 3:45 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:19
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Better data connected to opinion than opinion alone.
How is opinion not connected to data? Have you found a way of neatly
separating the information and data from opinion and
that reminds me that we do not really know what a word means
until we understand what the opposite stands for.
a sorta duality that math may be based on
that may even be the basis of existence
of how something can come
from nothing.
RR
a semantic toe
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Roger Clough
Roger, Thank you for this post an esp for the link to 'Russell on Leibniz'.
Richard
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Here's Bertrand Russell's view of Leibniz's definition of substance
http://www.ditext.com/russell/leib1.html#3
Every proposition has a
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
there is no reason to identify God with the God-father of Christian
theory.
Conservative Christianity is deplorable in a great number of ways but it is
superior to liberal theology in one important regard, it states that it
might be a
On 06 Jan 2013, at 02:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that
it is the long way around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
I guess you meant it's harder because you CAN'T
On 1/8/2013 6:36 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:47:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is
the long
way around.
No, it's harder because you can
On 1/8/2013 6:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Jan 2013, at 19:53, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
mailto:rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Theism, like atheism, is unprovable.
Why is that? You're saying that even though God is omnipotent He is
On 1/8/2013 9:14 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
GOD means the reality in which you believe.
Friends, are you tired of your old job, it's time to change your occupation and make big
bucks, amaze your
On 1/8/2013 9:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Jan 2013, at 02:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is the long way
around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
I guess
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:50, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Anna panth...@mail.com wrote:
Humble coin toss thrust to heart of multiverse debate
02 January 2013 by Jacob Aron
Magazine issue 2898. Subscribe and save
For similar stories, visit the Cosmology Topic Guide
WHY
On 08 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Roger Clough wrote:
Wave collapse and consciousness
According to the discussion below, a field only has potential
existence, it does not exist by itself. It requires a body to
interact with it.
This difference is easily confused in usage. For example, we
may
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
unlike psi it would be easily repeatable, if one person who claimed to
have a sense of humor laughed and said that was a very good joke it is
statistically very likely (although not certain) that another person who
also
On 1/8/2013 10:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Jan 2013, at 23:57, meekerdb wrote:
In Bruno's theory both mind and matter are products of computation. I think it will
turn out, as you say, that they are mutually necessary.
At *our level* I grant that they are both necessary.
But this
At the most basic level reality is a discrete digital particle arithmetic
with no need for further calculations in a block universe.
At a higher level it is analog
in the realm of quantum waves and fields
including the electromagnetic field and perhaps some bosons
And at the highest/physical
2013/1/8 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
At the most basic level reality is a discrete digital particle arithmetic
with no need for further calculations in a block universe.
Then it is indistinguishable from a contiuous or discrete mathematical
manifold of some kind. This manifold is
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/8 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
At the most basic level reality is a discrete digital particle arithmetic
with no need for further calculations in a block universe.
Then it is indistinguishable from a
On 1/8/2013 12:25 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Le me add some meat here
Nah. It's just your wishful thinking that everybody has to believe in God.
We can not reduce the concept of God to a boring principle that we need to put
somewhere. Like a ugly furniture inherited from the
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 12:37:47 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/8/2013 6:36 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:47:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 1:27:20 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
unlike psi it would be easily repeatable, if one person who claimed to
have a sense of humor laughed and said that was a very good joke it is
On 1/8/2013 4:42 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2013/1/9 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 1/8/2013 12:25 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Le me add some meat here
Nah. It's just your wishful thinking that everybody has to believe in God.
On Jan 7, 6:42 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:47 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net socra...@bezeqint.net
wrote:
Science is a religion by itself. Why?
Becouse the God can create and govern the Universe
only using physical laws, formulas, equations.
Then
On Jan 7, 7:53 pm, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Theism, like atheism, is unprovable.
Why is that? You're saying that even though God is omnipotent He is
incapable of proving His existence to us. I can prove my existence
On Jan 8, 1:48 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/7/2013 10:47 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 spudboy...@aol.com mailto:spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Consider God, a word for Mind
OK, I have a mind therefore I am God.
I said it before I'll say it again, for
On Jan 8, 12:42 pm, Roger Cloughrclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Russell was a brilliant logician, but that's all he was.
Brent
To have logical mind is very good.
But our brain sometime works unconscious.
=.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Quantum electrodynamics + Biology = Who am I ?
==.
Cells make copies of themselves.
Different cells make different copies of themselves.
Cells come in all shapes and sizes.
Somehow these different cells are tied between themselves
and during pregnancy process of 9 months gradually ( ! )
44 matches
Mail list logo
