Le 13 juil. 2014 03:31, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 02:01:38AM +0200, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Either both are the same computation and goes through the same state
computing the same thing or they're not and don't go through the same
state. An
Le 13 juil. 2014 09:58, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 13 juil. 2014 03:31, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au a
écrit :
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 02:01:38AM +0200, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Either both are the same computation and goes through the same state
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to use
the Mao suit at least?
2014-07-13 5:52 GMT+02:00, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Comrades:
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to use
the Mao suit at least?
Just to know better what our Lords though for us, in order to love
them even more.
2014-07-13 5:52 GMT+02:00, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com:
Comrades:
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to
dress the Mao suit at least?
Just to know better what our Lords though for us, in order to love
them even more.
2014-07-13 5:52 GMT+02:00, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com:
Le 13 juil. 2014 10:21, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a écrit :
Comrades:
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to
dress the Mao suit at least?
Just to know better what our Lords though for us, in order to love
them even more.
Don't be worried, fascists
I mean..
I know that preventive abortions of low class people,
homosexualization and proletarization of women working 8x7x365 away
from home is the solution, but some of us can survive and have to
dress something.
2014-07-13 10:21 GMT+02:00, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com:
Comrades:
2014-07-13 10:24 GMT+02:00, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
Le 13 juil. 2014 10:21, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a écrit :
Comrades:
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to
dress the Mao suit at least?
Just to know better what our Lords though for us,
Le 13 juil. 2014 10:34, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a écrit :
2014-07-13 10:24 GMT+02:00, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
Le 13 juil. 2014 10:21, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Comrades:
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to
No doubt you have evil inside. And your sense of humorI know some
famous political psychopaths that would sign that joke.
But you are not alone. That evil is a product of your ideology, the
same ideology professed by all the planet saviors in this list and
abroad.
Perhaps you are more
Le 13 juil. 2014 11:11, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a écrit :
No doubt you have evil inside. And your sense of humorI know some
famous political psychopaths that would sign that joke.
You're a joke. Don't like being called what you are?
But you are not alone. That evil is a
On 13 July 2014 17:18, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/12/2014 9:18 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 July 2014 15:53, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If you can explain what axiomatic means, I think you'll find it on
the circle. For example, it might mean whatever seems necessarily
Well, that settles it then.
On 13 July 2014 17:24, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/36
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
A foetus knows various things, called instincts.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
On 13 July 2014 07:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/12/2014 4:23 AM, LizR wrote:
On 12 July 2014 07:58, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Liz, you missed my words about 'atheist' and 'agnostic'. Fighting AGAINST
something reqires SOME concept of the enemy, so an atheist
On 13 July 2014 05:34, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
If there are two (and there are) why didn't Bruno Marchal ask what
cities John Clark will see from *a* 1p?
That is the 3p view *on* the future 1-views.
The? why
On 12 July 2014 23:14, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 July 2014 05:41, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:37 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
If the MWI is correct, the electron spin question is equivalent to the
teleporter question.
No it is not and
That sounds like one of the sanest things I've heard in a while.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Sure: Do you believe in a theist god?
I'd like to.
So we can keep using the word theology and keep some academic departments
that have no subject.
This would also include political science, arts, gender studies, french
literature. Are you willing to go that far, and make what doesn't
Le 13 juil. 2014 12:42, LizR lizj...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 12 July 2014 23:14, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 July 2014 05:41, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:37 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
If the MWI is correct, the electron spin question is
On 11 July 2014 19:21, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I agree with Brent, and I think everybody agree, when he says that reducing
does not eliminate.
You are a little too quick here with your everybody, since obviously
my whole point has been that I *don't* agree! I would remind you
I see
Ladies and gentleman: this is the shape of things to come. Nothing new
under the sun.
2014-07-13 11:24 GMT+02:00, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
Le 13 juil. 2014 11:11, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a écrit :
No doubt you have evil inside. And your sense of humorI know
Le 13 juil. 2014 14:22, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com a écrit :
I see
Ladies and gentleman: this is the shape of things to come. Nothing new
under the sun.
To appease your sadness, me and my evil friends will ensure you'll be the
first to be our energy savior by doing a good
On 12 July 2014 20:34, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Of course they wouldn't because 17 is a prime number is a tautology. It's
true simply in virtue of it's meaning like x is x. But is it a fact about
the world or just a fact about language?
I must confess to being somewhat
If above refers to previous post, you are too kind in plain view of the
baroque self-display, my apologies.
If not, then I hereby declare myself Captain Awkward.
In any case, I'll try to keep the personal stuff a bit more under control.
Must be the football jock testosterone + toxic doughnuts +
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:27 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 July 2014 06:50, Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Platonist Guitar
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
That was a nice read. I am rooting for Germany out of empathy for my host
country, while bracing for the endless fireworks over Berlin.
More than for a win in the game, I hope for party.
As in C'mon guys, F the
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 4:51 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 July 2014 07:17, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 7/12/2014 1:23 AM, LizR wrote:
Brent,
You left me hanging a week or so ago, and never got back to me about
something I'm interested in finding out more about.
On 10 Jul 2014, at 21:56, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/10/2014 12:19 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-07-10 20:39 GMT+02:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 7/10/2014 4:08 AM, David Nyman wrote:
In short, under physicalism, a 'computation' *just is* a
particular sequence of physical states.
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alberto G.
No doubt you have evil inside. And your sense of humorI know some famous
political psychopaths that would sign that joke.
But you are not alone. That evil
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Quentin Anciaux
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 1:55 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: How will air travel work in a green solar economy?
Le 13 juil. 2014 10:34, Alberto G.
On 12 Jul 2014, at 19:34, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
If there are two (and there are) why didn't Bruno Marchal ask
what cities John Clark will see from *a* 1p?
That is the 3p view *on* the future 1-views.
The? why not *a* future
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alberto G. Corona
Textile plants demand also a lot of energy. Do will be allowed to use the Mao
suit at least?
What textile plants?... Didn't they all get outsourced to
On 12 Jul 2014, at 21:17, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2014 1:23 AM, LizR wrote:
Brent,
You left me hanging a week or so ago, and never got back to me
about something I'm interested in finding out more about.
On 2 July 2014 23:14, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 July 2014 17:06, meekerdb
On 12 Jul 2014, at 21:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2014 2:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2014, at 22:26, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2014 11:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2014, at 09:41, David Nyman wrote:
On 11 July 2014 00:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
As I
On 7/13/2014 8:51 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
That being said, I tend to become a postmodernist when the word explanation shows up.
I see science as pure description. I find it is easy to fall into the trap of seeing
explanation where none is given. People say to kids: the moon orbits the earth
On 12 Jul 2014, at 22:34, John Mikes wrote:
Thanks, Bruno, for your thoughtful response. - However: you wrote
...This might mean that you are not aware of the discovery of Gödel
and Tarski which show the transcendence and independence of the
arithmetical reality with respect to us (and
On 13 Jul 2014, at 10:04, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 13 juil. 2014 09:58, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Le 13 juil. 2014 03:31, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 02:01:38AM +0200, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Either both are
On 13 Jul 2014, at 12:37, LizR wrote:
On 13 July 2014 05:34, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
If there are two (and there are) why didn't Bruno Marchal ask
what cities John Clark will see from *a* 1p?
That is the 3p view
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:42 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
I don't see people rushing into uranium and thorium power
Unfortunately I don't see people rushing into thorium power either, at
least in the West, but it needn't have been that way; as I
On 13 Jul 2014, at 14:19, David Nyman wrote:
On 11 July 2014 19:21, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
I agree with Brent, and I think everybody agree, when he says that
reducing
does not eliminate.
You are a little too quick here with your everybody, since obviously
my whole point
On 7/13/2014 12:25 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Jul 2014, at 21:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/12/2014 2:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2014, at 22:26, meekerdb wrote:
On 7/11/2014 11:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Jul 2014, at 09:41, David Nyman wrote:
On 11 July 2014 00:54,
On 7/13/2014 11:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Then, look at my preceding post to you. I don't know for Tegmark, but computationalism
excels in differentiating and relating the different sort of existence: ontological,
epistemological, observational, communicable or not, theological, etc.
On 13 July 2014 22:01, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Well, if you still hold to your earlier opinion, you should agree
that, in terms of an explanatory hierarchy based on an ontology of
molecular kinetics, temperature must be considered to have been
eliminated *ontologically* (i.e.
On 7/13/2014 5:38 PM, David Nyman wrote:
On 13 July 2014 22:01, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Well, if you still hold to your earlier opinion, you should agree
that, in terms of an explanatory hierarchy based on an ontology of
molecular kinetics, temperature must be considered to have
45 matches
Mail list logo
