RE: Is there any anti-signature software? (icm-computer)

2002-01-22 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Is there any anti-signature software? (icm-computer) 1. Now I am thinking is there any anti - signature software or procedure? You know like anti-virus with a specific type of file filtering? Sounds like an untapped market. There was a little Outlook client add on called 'Clipper'

RE: Send a message with SMTP

2002-01-22 Thread Lefkovics, William
If you hide him from the GAL, you could send with full address. If he is internal to your org, why the desire to see the SMTP address? William -Original Message- From: LE PERDRIEL Jean-François [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: Backu Software + Public Folders

2002-01-22 Thread Lefkovics, William
Pourquoi pas 'deleted item retention'? Comme ca: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm William -Original Message- From: LE PERDRIEL Jean-François [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Backu Software +

RE: Exchange 5.0 server acting as an open relay

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
can set to allow routing to only internal/specific subnet IPs. for me, tat stopped the relaying. nic -- From: Lefkovics, William[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: OWA usage

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
No, one CAL per user. You're thinking of Oracle... ;) -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:33 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage Is that the Microsoft

RE: OWA usage

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Disclaimer: This is only opinion. I would argue vehemently. It is my understanding, one CAL per user/mailbox. No CAL's for resource boxes. The employee does not access from home and from the office at the same time. Or, if that is the case, the server running OWA is the only 'computer'

RE: OWA usage

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: OWA usage Create a group called NOOWA and deny local login rights to the OWA server to its members. Just a thought. There are many other means, like restricting HTTP. -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:48

RE: Mailbox Issue

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message You created a profile with what services? In what mode? Is his email now in a pst file on that workstation? William -Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:34 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:

RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
I learn something new here every day. -Original Message- From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server That's a feature of Outlook 2002. It can be turned off

RE: OWA usage

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
That would only fix half of the problem. A single OWA-enabled user can access his OWA account from any Internet-connected PC in the world! I'd *hate* to pay MS for that many CALs... :-) /\/iels -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January

RE: outlook personal folders

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
http://www.exchangefaq.org/security/0004.php3 William -Original Message- From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: outlook personal folders Is there a way to break into Personal Folders in Outlook if

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message Not as good as this one, though, eh? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450 William -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License

RE: License Question

2002-01-21 Thread Lefkovics, William
Question That's your favorite. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question Not as good as this one, though, eh? http://support.microsoft.com

RE: Error 1018

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
-1018 errors are not always easy to figure out either. There is a KB article or two on troubleshooting them. You seem to have the backing for a good server. Look at drive configuration. Good to have logs on a separate spindle than the databases. -Original Message-From: Jamie

RE: OWA - Can't Login

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
1) anything in the app event logs? 2) tried cycling the IIS? William -Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA - Can't Login I have an interesting problem that just started

RE: Unable to get to Resource calendar

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:03 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Unable to get to Resource calendar What is the Exchange client? And we don't have Outlook 2000. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William

RE: Please, spare us from Policy Patrol!

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
I played with their product, disclaimit, in beta about 6 months ago. It was pretty good. I hope my company never forces its use. But for some this is the perfect solution. I already do flash and DHTML in email, so having that within a disclaimer is, well, old hat (using stationery on some

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message I think he means not all of us have the wealth of experience or knowledge of clusters that someone with the monicker 'clusterboy' might have. -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
y, January 18, 2002 11:09 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering Exchange WHOA -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering Exchange I

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
anyway? -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering Exchange I think he means not all of us have the wealth of experience or knowledge of clusters

RE: Outlook Question

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
In C/W mode: http://www.microgarden.com/outlooktools/index.htm http://www.grinningshark.com/ Outlook.com: $1.5M!?!? http://page.auctions.shopping.yahoo.com/auction/60019145 William -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002

RE: Outlook Question BCC

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
Of course that would defeat the intent of BCC wouldn't it? -Original Message- From: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 12:54 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook Question BCC Is there a way to tell if an email you received had

RE: Outlook Question BCC

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
: Mathews, James E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 1:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook Question BCC and your point is what? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:57 PM To: MS

RE: mail enabled users and GAL

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: vpn with outlook Mail-enbled mailbox-enabled. If I understand you. For mail-enabled contacts to have email addresses with the SMTP domain, then they pretty much have to be users and not contacts. William -Original Message-From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Exchange 5.0 server acting as an open relay

2002-01-18 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message There is no way to fully prevent Exchange5.0 from relaying. William -Original Message-From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.0 server acting as an open relay I have to visit a

RE: Public folder limits

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
Actually it doesn't. It is only used to set the warning. An admin would have to act on it. As far as I recall, there is no effective means of limiting public FOLDER size. William -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17,

RE: Public folder limits

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
being a question rather than a statement! To me, it is an effective means of limiting a PF but to others it may not. Kevin -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public folder limits

RE: Public folder limits

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
already have! Kevin -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 08:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public folder limits Feel free to write something that accomplishes this. ;) William -Original Message- From: Snook

RE: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
I know DEC-all about that. -Original Message-From: Nadeem Rehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Migration From DEC to Exchange 2000 To All: Anyone know how to migrate users from DEC all-in-one directly

RE: Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
I don't remember what version you have. (Site addressing?) William -Original Message- From: Jim Busick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Alias template has changed Somehow our alias name for new mailboxes has

RE: Alias template has changed

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
]] Posted At: 17 January 2002 17:01 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Alias template has changed Subject: RE: Alias template has changed Sorry, Ex5.5/sp4 -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:57 AM To: MS

RE: Allowing POP3 Access

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
Yes, Exchange is an RFC compliant IMAP4 and POP3 server. It will work with any RFC compliant POP client from incredimail to outlook express to pine. -Original Message- From: Jim Traino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: Clustering Exchange

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
An OWA web farm? -Original Message- From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange I disagree. You can have fantastic clusters with up to thirty two machines that will give you no

RE: Exch2k and SP2, is it safe?

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
There is a risk of increased stability and improved performance! Oh and watch out for those nasty 'new email' alerts in OWA! sp2 has been good to me. William -Original Message-From: Michael Morisoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:16 AMTo:

RE: Ex 5.5 vs Ex 2000

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
S many variables. Does the upgrade path fit your companies' needs? Exchange2000 is a good move, but there is a learning curve. The end users do not really see any difference aside from OWA. AD deployment should not be underestimated either. I do not know. I like to keep plugging away

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved

2002-01-17 Thread Lefkovics, William
Jason Dwyer, Super Sleuth. -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space - Solved Hi all, As many of you suggested, some sleuthing was

RE: Exchange Book

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
There are secrets?!?!? William -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange Book I just purchased Exchanger Server 5.5 Secrets by Robert Guaraldi. Anybody want to express

RE: Outlook 2000 License???

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
That is my understanding as well. But in the big picture, I know squat. -Original Message-From: Scot Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:38 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 2000 License??? Up to and including 2000, but if I

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Hi Eric. What version of exchange have thou? You can have many SMTP domains in Exchange, but with MAPI clients, only one 'reply address'. If you want to change users to the new domain for replying and still retain inbound for the old one in Exchange5.5 you can do one of two things: 1)

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Message headers are easily viewed from the client. Outlook2000 for example, from the message: View--Options Outlook Express I think it's: File--Properties--Details If you have SMTP logging maxxed, you could get the info there as well. William -Original Message- From: Eric Brouwer

RE: OWA for 5.5

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Really? What does it use? William -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Well on a Win 2000 server Exch 5.5 OWA will not work with IIS 5. -Original

RE: Exchange Book

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Can I also recommend a freebie resource for VBScript? The users guide and language reference from Microsoft is quite helpful. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/script56/ht ml/vtoriVBScript.asp (watch for link wrap [1]) William [1] That's not a fair trade!!

RE: Trancenders Exchange 2000

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
I think Beach Front Quizzer will have a new Exchange2000 product soon to compete with those, too. William -Original Message- From: Roland van Hierden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Trancenders Exchange 2000

RE: Exchange Book

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Paul Robichaux also casually maintains a website www.exchangefaq.org . William -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Book What's the title of Paul's 5.5 book. I

RE: Exchange Book

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Yes, in hindsight, that was a mistake. William -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange Book And your wife-to-be would be less than impressed if you spent the

RE: How to do a proper RDISK if you can't fit the files on the fl oppy ???

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to??? Indeed. You can even script that to occur nightly, or weekly, or whenever. -Original Message-From: Brown, Ken F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:00 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: OWA for 5.5

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: OWA for 5.5 As it should. -Original Message-From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:04 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Ok you have Win2000 server SP2 with Exchange 5.5 SP4on it with IIS 5 and it works?

RE: OWA for 5.5

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
What is exchange.a? William -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:06 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Huh? Who told you that?? That is 100% incorrect as I am sure many admins that run that

RE: OWA for 5.5

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
I thought maybe it was a Canadian thing. William -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:10 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 A virus? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William

RE: looking for love address on the exchange server

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
back to the Exchange name? Works on mine... -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 January 2002 19:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: looking for love address on the exchange server 1) send an email requesting a delivery receipt. 2

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
, it still says they were received by mailhost.vgreen.com. Is it maybe not an Exchange issue? Could it be related to how the server is named or my DNS? What determines that part of the header info? -Original Message----- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Exchange setup question

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange setup question I don't think I'm talking NT domains either. Where do I look at info regarding the SMTP domain? -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January

RE: OWA for 5.5

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
No. Exchange5.5 OWA can access Exchange2000. BUT Exchange2000 OWA CAN NOT access Exchange5.5. William -Original Message- From: Baker, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA for 5.5 Can you run Win2000

RE: OWA for 5.5

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
For many companies I've talked to, OWA in 2000 is the primary reason for migrating to Exchange2000. The rest doesn't really affect the client that much. William -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:11 PM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
anything in the application event log? online maintenance is happening each night? William -Original Message- From: Bob Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Delayed/Non delivery of Internet mail Hello

RE: Outlook problem

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
I have no good ideas other than to stop using Word as an email editor. Sorry. :o/ William -Original Message- From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook problem I have a strange one: Outlook

RE: Outlook problem

2002-01-16 Thread Lefkovics, William
the winmail.dat issue... could this be the problem? B -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 08:46 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook problem I have no good ideas other than to stop using Word as an email editor. Sorry. :o

RE: Email Groups

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Who is Bill? William -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Email Groups I'll make it a hat trick. Bill and Peter are correct. There is no way to address a message to a

RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to???

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Preferred: 1) run NTBackup ON the SBS server while Exchange is running. or 2) dump SBS Last resort: 2) stop exchange services (net stop MSExchangeSA /y) and copy priv.edb, pub.edb, and dir.edb to a file location References: 3)

RE: How do I eliminate specific individuals?

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
MICHèLE SHARIK Pretend for a moment that I'm not psychic and provide the version and sp level, please. /MICHèLE SHARIK For Exchange5.5: Section 3.6: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm For Exchange2000: Section 5.3: http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec5.htm William

RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to???

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
The admin training alone would cost more than SBS. Then there is the explaining to management about missing functionality. Perhaps Ellison's Oracle messaging application? William -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:01 PM

RE: An odd, but quick, question on Exchange 2k /forestprep

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
I don't *think* so. It will attempt the same schema changes. William -Original Message- From: Mike Rausch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: An odd, but quick, question on Exchange 2k /forestprep Ok, I running

RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to???

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to??? That would be the equivalent of BLB. There are risks/issues you must assume in doing so. It is a good backup to your backups, expecially for the most important mailboxes, like the Exchange Administrator or

RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to???

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
server on a SBS box, How to??? I must've missed something. Why can't NTBackup be used? Multiple servers? -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: No budget backups

RE: GDY appended to display name

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Is GDY an acronym for something? Or are these letters actually appended? What other apps are on your Exchange Server? A/V? William -Original Message- From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: GDY appended

RE: Outlook question

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
If their mail server is 'off site' then they likely are not using MAPI profiles and are using POP or IMAP to access email. This does not allow for 'shared calendars' as .pst files can only be accessed one at a time. However, teamfolders *might* be a solution.

RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to???

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
CTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: No budget backups of exchange server on a SBS box, How to??? I figured as much. Doesn't Exchange on SBS make NTBackup Exchange-aware? -Original Message-From: Lefkovic

RE: GDY appended to display name

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
/af-query.asp?String=exactAcronym=GDY -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 16:59 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: GDY appended to display name Is GDY an acronym for something? Or are these letters actually

RE: Outlook question

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
No worries. Not much help though. :o/ William -Original Message- From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Outlook question Thanks William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Where are the transaction logs? \\exchsrvr\mdbdata\edbx.log each should be 5120MB. Are these on the C:\ drive? Are they getting purged after full online backups? William -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:10 PM To:

RE: Urgent Running out of Drive space

2002-01-15 Thread Lefkovics, William
Sorry, you said EVERYTHING is on the E:\ drive. Then I would look at pagefile.sys perhaps? Do you have some antivirus with a quarantine folder on C:\? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: IMS hung up again...

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
1) rerun performance optimiser. or 2) Apply Service Pack 4. Then rerun Performance Optimiser. or 3) remove and reinstall the IMS. Repply service pack 3, then rerun performance optimiser. William Lefkovics -Original Message- From: Mike Zatkalik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Exchange 5.5 Calendar Deletion

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
Why at me? Will -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Calendar Deletion Advanced find... Sort by date Delete at will - Original Message - From: Sethi,

RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
You don't really gain anything putting the OWA part in the DMZ. OWA acts as what I call MAPI-by-proxy so the number of holes you need to punch in the internal firewall basically denigrates your DMZ. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
the store THEN immediately do an online backup. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 Ouch! Where did you read 'to start

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg. Is Snoop Dog your bro? William -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 You turned on Circular logging [1]? Please

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
-famous Dogg Foundation? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 The subject indicates 5.5, Mr Dogg. Is Snoop Dog your bro? William

RE: IMS hung up again...

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
-Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS hung up again... 1) rerun performance optimiser. or 2) Apply Service Pack 4. Then rerun Performance Optimiser. or 3) remove and reinstall

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 The very same. He worked hand in hand with Al Gore on the design of the internet. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

RE: IMS hung up again...

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
they stress the server either. Mike Z -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IMS hung up again... I usually leave it as default, which is what? 30 inbound, 20 outbound

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
hand in hand with Al Gore on the design of the internet. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 THE Milton R Dogg?!?! -Original Message

RE: forwarding question

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
I am not certain what you are asking. They don't want to make the internal mail server addresses public The sender would need to know, right? Do you mean the SMTP addresses or the IP addresses? -Original Message- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: forwarding question

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
The SMTP address, you can't send from the internet to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because it is not a registered domain, the address wouldn't be resolved. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE

RE: BLOCKING SPAM AT THE SERVER

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
If you know the domain/SMTP address of the sender, you can use message filtering at the IMS. Otherwise, a third party app is really required. Message filtering: IMS Properties--Connections Tab--MessageFiltering button. Rudimentary filtering is available on many email clients as well, including

RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
very well protected... Only thing better would be Apache on OpenBSD, but that's another can-o-worms. -Rick -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: DMZ, OWA

RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions Just be aware: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q309508 -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: DMZ

RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
. The original version of IISLockdown was completely unsafe to use, and in some cases rendered your system unusable. But the new version has options for OWA systems in the install. Check it out sometime. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday

RE: DMZ, OWA and Exchange 5.5 questions

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
and Exchange 5.5 questions That areticle seems to be posted after the original versions. In the install of ver 2 its simply an option you select for "Microsoft Exchange OWA system" -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, 15 Ja

RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5

2002-01-14 Thread Lefkovics, William
Ya, I was scared reading that. -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Transaciton logs in 5.5 I don't think that's right buddy, they aren't committed until you backup, then they

RE: 1st phase of upgrading from 5.5 to 2k

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
The books are now incorrect. It is best to install the Active Directory Connector from the Exchange2000 servicepack2 CD or download. The differences? One works better. ;o) Wow... these are big letters... William -Original Message-From: ONG Liang Bu (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
I just realised *you* started this thread. You are SO unsupported! William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange I am very familar with

RE: I.E.5.5

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
Only barely. Anyway, I see no logical reason for a Microsoft application running beside another Microsoft application running atop a Microsoft operating system to have any problems at all. (ie IE 5.5sp2 works on my Exch5.5sp4 NTsp6a station with OWA.) William -Original Message-

RE: Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
Mostly greater stability, NTBackup to disk, ocnnectivity to active directory (if you're at that point). -Original Message- From: Rajalakshmi Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hi,

RE: Database recovery help

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
I hear it causes -1019 errors... could be a rumour though... -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Database recovery help Don't do brick level backups. It's not worth

RE: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs?

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
I tried that once, but Milton's $250/hour was too pricey for me. -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs? Milton, please

RE: Database recovery help

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
www.taobackup.com [1] William [1] Thanks for the link, Michèle -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Database recovery help Don't use arcserve either. I have to and it SUCKS.

RE: OWA on Exchange

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
Hi Fred: Pros: Single admin entity Simple for small deployments Less hardware, therefor cheaper. Cons: IIS and the related patches reside on the mail server. Server performance burdened with IIS and Exchange on the same box. Applying IIS patches to your exchange

RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - Domino/Notes Versus Exchange Nah. He's just making sound like he's more in the know than he really is. And the decision to move to an SQL back end was made way before Larry's little announcement. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto

RE: OWA on Exchange

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
right, my concerns do deal with having to enble IIS and constantly making sure all the patches are applied. Thanks, fred -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA on Exchange

RE: OWA on Exchange

2002-01-10 Thread Lefkovics, William
? We don't use ADS as of yet so the install will still be EX55sp4. I may be using the Ed Crowley move method. Thanks again, Fred -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >