--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A:
No, thats not quite the angle that struck me as so funny.
The
deliciousness of the phrase is more a mu experience, a
la whats
wrong with this picture.
J:
What's wrong with the picture of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But they have to get 'scholarships' in order for the
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years and
then one day, the room goes from total darkness to total light,
is
funny, in a
Many of us know that the primary, concrete(?)
meaning of the word 'guNa' is 'string'.
I wonder if that has any connection with the
string theories of modern physics.
I mean, sattva aka sato-guNa could have
a connection with energy field strings,
rajo-guNa with gauge boson strings(??),
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akasha:
Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that the whole
paradigm about enlightenment on this list is dichotomous,
digital, either on or off?
Unc:
YES! That's exactly the issue.
I realized
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL
Title: Vijaya Dashami: Victory Day, 12th October 2005
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that the
whole paradigm about enlightenment on this list is
dichotomous, digital, either on or off?
Unc:
YES! That's exactly the issue.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that the
whole
paradigm about enlightenment on this list is dichotomous,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that the
whole
paradigm about enlightenment on this list is dichotomous,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
Does it strike anyone else as funny, even absurd, that
Title: Vijaya Dashami: Victory Day, 12th October 2005
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I ask because I've said in a number of posts that
the
longer I meditate, the less overshadowed I am.
And certainly MMY teaches that it's a gradual
process,
so I'm not sure why any TMer would hold that
belief.
MMY teaches that it is
On 9/27/05 6:52 PM, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, when neo-advaitists sell a dichotomous view of
enlightenment, and on top of that proclaim You just need to BELIEVE
Peter, and you CAN fly (as in Peter Pan), Just BELIEVE it and you
ARE enlightened -- and the light
On 9/27/05 7:13 PM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years and
then one day, the room goes from total darkness to total light, is
funny, in a charming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I ask because I've said in a number of posts that
the
longer I meditate, the less overshadowed I am.
And certainly MMY teaches that it's a gradual
process,
On 9/28/05 4:20 AM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have long suggested that we run some tests on the self-proclaimed
Es. Push'em off a cliff. And if they don't come back, we will
celebrate their saintliness.
MMY once commented, or so I am told, that the sidhis would be an eye-
akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years and
then one day, the room goes from total darkness to total light, is
funny, in a charming way. So to the extent people keep insisting IT
is already there, they are correct -- to a degree.
Camelot Owner Hopes for Peace Palace
Third in a Multi-Part Series
By NANCY K. OWENS
Associate Editor
PITIFUL UPKEEP: What was the Camelot Hotel continues to rot at I-44 and Peroria
Avenue in Tulsa.
Editors Note: This is the third of a multi-part series investigating the
demise and
Akasha 108 writes:snipped from long interchange with Unc
That's the one point on all of this where I think we differ. First, I
see no value in labels such as enlightenment. It can create
distinctions, it can creates longing for titles, it can create false
egos, it can creates scams, etc. And the
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really have a problem with that E word for two reasons. One it
carries such tremendous baggage that it does all of what Akasha
has said above without anyone knowing it does.
I completely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll
order some pizza from cave service and think about it over
lunch. :-)
Dude, if you are living in Paris and you order up take-out pizza --
you are not only way UnAwake, you are a gastronomic baffoon. :)
Turquoise, thanks for your comments. I agree about Highway 61
Revisited,
although I can't remember all that was on it. Those songs were
life-changers.
Nothing much else got through to me in those long-gone days. Part 2
of the
documentary is just as good as the first part, so get the DVD as soon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I ask because I've said in a number of posts that the
longer I meditate, the less overshadowed I am.
And certainly MMY teaches that it's a gradual process,
so I'm not sure why any TMer would hold that belief.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/05 7:13 PM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
To hold, as some appear to, that we meditate for 20-30 years and
then one day,
On 9/28/05 4:05 AM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hari Om,
I heard that, in an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The map is not the territory. I think what's going
on here is that Judy is more attached to being able
to say, Ah...finally...I have the map, than in
actually getting to the place it points to. And
the last
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
How do you know this is impossible, Judy, if you haven't
tried
it?
Judy:
Oh, for heaven's sake, of course I've tried
On 9/28/05 9:50 AM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I believe I said. Above, I was describing my own
experience. You snipped the part (without noting it)
that made this clear, apparently to make it appear I
was making a general statement that you could
correct.
Yes it was a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
For me the word Awake is pretty simple and conveys my
understanding that PC is in the foreground all the time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The only reason it is said in advaitist circles that we are already
enlightened is that from the perspective of the experience of the
non-dual state it is recognized it was always like this, this is an
unborn state, it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I ask because I've said in a number of posts that the
longer I meditate, the less overshadowed I am.
And certainly MMY teaches that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And for the record:
I would say that experience was far more real than
understanding. The more experiences I have of higher
states of attention, the less I understand. And the
happier I am. Go figure.
This is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And for the record:
I would say that experience was far more real than
understanding. The more experiences I have of higher
states of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
But when the performance was over, the Gift
departed and would not translate itself into
any other form. So Dylan was left inarticulate,
ordinary, not interesting at all.
His recent autobiography, however, has
Judy:
I plan to let it happen whenever it's
ready to happen.
Rory:
How will you know when it is ready to happen?
I won't know until it happens.
How are you going to let it happen if you won't know until it
happens?
Who do you think is going to do this for you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy:
And what on
earth leads you to think that it's something
you *make*?
Rory:
If not you, then who?
Emphasis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 9:50 AM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I believe I said. Above, I was describing my own
experience. You snipped the part (without noting it)
that made this clear, apparently to make it appear I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy:
And what on
earth leads you to think that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And for the record:
I would say that experience was far more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
But when the performance was over, the Gift
departed and would not translate itself into
any other form. So Dylan was left inarticulate,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Akasha:
Pure consciousness begins from the first mediation. If not
before.
Uuc:
Before. There has never been a moment in my life when
I was not enlightened.
A:
That's the one point on all of this where I think we differ.
Again, I see no value in labels such as
Akasha:
yes. Reminds me of EST.
Judy:
Even est had a method to sort of shock people into
it. The whole training was one big koan, it seems
to me: the first weekend, they convinced you that you
had total control over everything; the second weekend,
they convinced you that you had no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I also find that the more often/longer Awareness
is present, the more of a pain it is when it
goes away.
Still laughing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Thus I favor just saying what is, instead of relying on unreliable
intermediary symbols. For example, constant foreground PC
expresses a specific state, is relatively concise (could be
shortened to CFPC), and is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll order some pizza from cave service and think
about it over lunch.
In a message dated 9/26/05 5:13:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A
friend is working on a TM project and is looking for clergy who ideally
practice TM and have something nice to say about it. Let me know if
you know anyone along these lines.
RonJesus H.
Yes, that's right. Some of the questions were extremely stupid and
deserved
the response they got, but others were more thoughtful and valid. In
a sense,
like many great artists, Dylan did not really know what he was doing;
he just
did it. Others, like Ginsberg, for example, could be much more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
yes. Reminds me of EST.
Judy:
Even est had a method to sort of shock people into
it. The whole training was one big koan, it seems
to me: the first weekend, they convinced you that you
had total
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1798944,00.html
Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent
sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your
In a message dated 9/26/05 6:00:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er,hadn't the treaty already been signed?
I don't think so, at least the senate had overwhelmingly
refused to ratify it.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
Pure consciousness begins from the first mediation. If not
before.
Uuc:
Before. There has never been a moment in my life when
I was not enlightened.
A:
That's the one point on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Thus I favor just saying what is, instead of relying on unreliable
intermediary symbols. For example, constant foreground PC
expresses a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/26/05 5:13:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jesus H. Christ.
Always wondered what the H stands for. Hirschell, Herman, Harry?
The definitive answer is to be found in Christopher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
But when the performance was over, the Gift
departed and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
for CC?
That's how MMY defines it (if it's permanent);
witnessing can apply to temporary experiences
(CC being 24-hour permanent witnessing).
It's a symbol, but for a
I think all of this speculating on why he wasn't more articulate during interviews really misses the point. He hated them, pure and simple. He, like many great artists as well as most others, was much more comfortable in small groups. He kept saying over and over, in his music as well as when
Ginsburg was quite a bit oder when those interviews took place, and more confident as a result. He also never got anywhere near the kind of attention Dylan did.
Sal
On Sep 28, 2005, at 9:55 AM, feste37 wrote:
Others, like Ginsberg, for example, could be much more
articulate about
their own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I also find that the more often/longer Awareness
is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ginsburg was quite a bit oder when those interviews took place, and
more confident as a result. He also never got anywhere near the
kind of attention Dylan did.
On the other hand, the actor Sir Laurence Olivier
was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
for CC?
That's how MMY defines it (if it's permanent);
witnessing can apply to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
Akasha:
Terming that as E, to me, goes beyond reporting. its labeling.
And since it differs from what many understand that term to be,
it simply promotes miscommunication.
Unc:
Fine. I've already told you that the only reason I
was using the E word was because it was already in
play
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A: Ah, then we seem to be talking the same thing.
Its odd though, I keep saying no labels, enjoy the (non)-trip and
you keep saying if you drop the labels, then you can enjoy the
continuum. Sounds the same to me.
Judy:
To expand a bit: You said in another post that it
feels false to you to want a higher state of
attention.
Unc:
Not so much false as completely unproductive.
To do so takes one out of Now
Akahsa:
Then perhaps the attention that can maintain PC in foreground is not
so strong and
--- akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
For example, is the experience of no I both a
necessary and
sufficent criteria. Is constant foreground PC a
sufficnet criteria for
CC? Is absence of anger (per many scriptural
references) a necessary
criteria?
Of course I am from the no I
A:
I think clear terms can facilitate discussion.
U:
But what does the discussion facilitate?
A: Well, it happens. its value -- maybe none. But you suggested
you have gained great value from recent discussions here. So you
tell me.
U:
Something someone said triggered a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not then just drop all discussions and concepts of E.
NOW you're talking! :-)
Have you ever had the experience (assuming that
you've had long, stable periods of 24/7 witnessing,
absolutely clear experiences of
Akasha:
Why not then just drop all discussions and concepts of E.
Unc:
NOW you're talking! :-)
A:
Yes. I have been suggeting such for some time.
But I appear to violate the rule at times because its interesting to
me to understand what people mean when they introduce and use the E
term,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ginsburg was quite a bit oder when those interviews took place, and
more confident as a result. He also never got anywhere near the
kind
Ask Aristotle
Find an MP
By postcode or place:
By surname:Or browse the map
How to use Aristotle
Archive search
Advanced search In this sectionBritain launches push for trade reform after last-minute deal on debt relief
Why equality was the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
for CC?
On 9/28/05 12:49 PM, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I am from the no I school (now if that
isn't a paradoxical statement). Any trace of I would
indicate an observing ego and be indicative of
avidya, not realization. Realization is not an
experience. It is not within the domain
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A section of this series documents the TMO's history of purchasing
properties with some grand golden expressed purpose (meditation
centers, ayurvedic health spas, etc.), but then in every case not
taking any steps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll order some pizza from cave service and think
about it over lunch.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I ask because I've said in a number of posts that the
longer I meditate, the less overshadowed I am.
And certainly MMY teaches that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 4:05 AM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/28/05 2:51 PM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 4:05 AM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
for CC?
That's how MMY defines it (if it's permanent);
witnessing can apply to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha:
But what is your definition of CC? (but define it in a non-
seeking
way :) )
Judy:
In my understanding of how MMY uses
On 9/28/05 3:00 PM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
for CC?
That's how MMY defines
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 2:51 PM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 4:05 AM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Judy:
And what on
earth leads you to think that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/26/05 6:00:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er,hadn't the treaty already been signed?
I don't think so, at least the senate had overwhelmingly refused to
ratify
it.
Hari Om,
A person reaches a stage where he knows everything that is needed to be known Intellectually, but had not yet reached Enlightenment. Perhaps such a stage can be called inlightened.
Is it possible that TMO itself is run by inlightened individuals rather than Enlightened
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
I ask because I've said in a number of posts that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is constant foreground PC a sufficnet criteria
for CC?
Using Uncs term, or what I can remember of it, uncletenspaltz, or
whatever, as I have come to understand, it includes all who are
progressing spiritually, from the humblest initiate to a full Buddha
who has achieved the Rainbow body. A nice group. Everyone is
uncletenspaltzen.
M's criteria for
New York Times
September 28, 2005
Ever Since A.D. 270, the Need to Get Away From It All
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN
ZAFARANA, Egypt - Men have retreated to the desert for centuries in
search of God, drawn by the quiet and the isolation, by a feeling of
divine presence in the barren landscape.
The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 2:51 PM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 4:05 AM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05 2:51 PM, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 9/28/05 4:05 AM,
SNIP
Hmmm. Must've missed that part. It DID say that yogic flying
was an
obstacle
of Cosmic Consciousness (Skt.: turiyatita).
Where exactly did it say that?
The Yoga Sutras say (somewhere) that powers are an obstacle
to Samadhi. I heard that MMY comment that the translation was
simply
On 9/28/05 4:40 PM, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The text that you keep referring to from the Shankaracharya
tradition
says this.
Hmmm. Must've missed that part. It DID say that yogic flying was an
obstacle
of Cosmic Consciousness (Skt.: turiyatita).
Where exactly did it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tazarmfune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hmmm. Must've missed that part. It DID say that yogic flying
was an
obstacle
of Cosmic Consciousness (Skt.: turiyatita).
Where exactly did it say that?
The Yoga Sutras say (somewhere) that powers
Subject: David Lynch on college tour
Award-winning film director David Lynch is currently touring college campuses
to discuss Consciousness, Creativity and the Brain.
Packed audiences have already enthusiastically welcomed the tour at
University of Michigan and American University. For a
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
