to be off by default.
Turning it on by default is almost guaranteed to break something,
whereas because it is new nothing will be currently using it - this
just seems a bit silly to me.
LeeE
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:50 AM, leee l...@spatial.plus.com
wrote:
As this would be a new feature, and one which might affect
existing behaviours, I _really_ think it ought to be off by
default.
I really can't imagine any sane system
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, leee wrote:
I agree that windup == bad and antiwindup == good, and that in
a perfect world no one would have leveraged windup and that
everyone would have implemented their PI simple controllers
correctly
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:55 PM, leee wrote:
There is always a risk associated with changing default
behaviour and the bottom line is that there is no immediate
need to do so, nor any overhead incurred by not doing so.
This just seems
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
leee wrote:
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
That might provide some idea of how much of an issue this is,
though obviously doesn't address non-CVS aircraft.
This is exactly the sort of think I'd hope to see at the end
on the FG scenery is pretty cool: is
there the scope to tune it to the terrain gradient i.e. adapt the
shader according to the steepness of the terrain slope?
LeeE
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new
is to control
everything, is it in a position to accept the responsibility of
maintaining and fixing it all?
LeeE
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
On Thursday 25 Feb 2010, James Turner wrote:
On 24 Feb 2010, at 22:15, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
logic filters use well known conditions to drive output
properties. Example for bax = baz (foo | bar).
Nice!
Regards,
James
Yes, a very useful addition.
LeeE
On Thursday 25 Feb 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
leee wrote:
On Wednesday 24 Feb 2010, Durk Talsma wrote:
[snip...]
As follows from this, I have to add that I'm not too excited
about all the invidual hangars, and scenery repository sites
(such as unitedfreeworld) that I'm seeing spring
. Is that not a usability issue?
LeeE
--
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
, not giving the
appearance that all is well.
LeeE
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans
a single bug,
Martin.
If ./configure is generating a makefile that doesn't work then there
is clearly a bug.
Saying that because the bug doesn't exist because it isn't
widespread is just being in denial, and is an excuse (not a reason)
for doing nothing about it.
LeeE
On Saturday 06 Feb 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
leee wrote:
On Saturday 06 Feb 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
John Denker wrote:
The fact that workarounds exist for this bug seems to
be rather strong evidence that the bug exists.
The sole fact that you're getting in trouble with the way you
it; can you see the
distant scenery (if that is what it is) disappearing as you fly
towards it?
If you try flying higher, can you establish whether there is indeed
a ring of scenery around your current position?
LeeE
On Monday 01 Feb 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
leee wrote:
On Sunday 31 Jan 2010, Erik Hofman wrote:
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
It's been a long time since I (re-)wrote the random object
code for OSG, but my recollection is that we use the same
random number seed when generating
, but FG long ago
became bigger than any of its contributors. It seems to me that
perhaps part of the the problem is that not all of the contributors
to FG realise that.
LeeE
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting
to run at a higher rate is
better implemented in controllers filters, or coded in C++.
LeeE
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best
/FCS/settings
/autopilot/FCS/targets
/autopilot/FCS/controls
LeeE
--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities
the rate at
which the controllers work is critical, depending upon the gains
used, a controller that might be stable on one system might become
unstable on a slower, or even sometimes a faster system (I've seen
this sort of problems happen both ways).
LeeE
-0.5, should be
about right.
However, simply doing this is likely to change the YASim CoG because
it distributes the total aircraft weight according to the various
element definitions.
LeeE
--
Throughout its 18-year
the rarest sense of
all; that of common sense.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market
look forward to hearing about your progress.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market
something new.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast
licences
where the originator is just letting other people use their slave
rather than granting the slave their freedom.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's
On Tuesday 05 Jan 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
leee wrote:
John, in referring to our software, I'm afraid that you're
missing the point of the GPL. Once the software has been
released under the GPL it isn't 'ours' or anyone else's
anymore; it is owned by no one.
Incorrect, the author
On Wednesday 23 Dec 2009, Alan Teeder wrote:
--
From: leee l...@spatial.plus.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:05 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] auto
and did nothing when enabled
for other FDMs.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process
approach,
and around 4000ft when I got on the glideslope for a straight in
approach using the AN-225 to mimic the AN-124s.
In view of what seems to happen at EGSS, I would say that the 14nm
range 5000ft altitude seem about right.
LeeE
On Friday 18 Dec 2009, John Denker wrote:
On 12/18/2009 12:30 PM, leee wrote:
I live beneath the turn-in point for clockwise approaches on 05
at Stanstead Airport (EGSS)
I assume that was supposed to say runway 04 at Stansted.
^^
Just
that I don't currently have a working FG or AC3D
here atm, otherwise I'd have a go at it for you, but I'm sure
someone else will be able to sort it out.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer
or contracts between
other parties; it can only talk about what the FG project does.
LeeE
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
to FG, it can become
a bit of a nightmare and impact your other work.
This was one of the factors that has called, at least temporarily, a
halt to my working with FG.
LeeE
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free
certainly need to look deeper than just what the western
political and manufacturing propaganda would suggest.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you
On Tuesday 27 Oct 2009, Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
Leee, you said If someone were to redistribute
an altered binary derived from a GPL'd work without making the
corresponding source code available then it is a straightforward
violation of the GPL and that is where the remedy should be
sought
On Sunday 25 Oct 2009, Durk Talsma wrote:
On Sunday 25 October 2009 09:50:40 pm leee wrote:
I'm sorry Durk, but you still don't get it. The license is not
there to protect anything but the freedom of the software.
It's not there to protect or assert any rights of the the users
(other
by the notice in the amended source. Then the issue
just comes down to whether the amended source code is made
available or not, which would then be a valid licensing issue.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R
at most. As mentioned previously though, the new
license would not be retroactive and would only apply to subsequent
development; the original GPL'd aircraft would still be GPL'd.
LeeE
--
Come build with us
the conditions of the GPL.
There is no room for dispute or modification; either it's ok for
you personally, as it is, or it is not. The GPL cannot be
reinterpreted to suit different peoples' opinions.
LeeE
--
Come build
of the GPL to distribute non-GPL'd
software along with GPL'd software, but while they can impose
restrictions upon their software, those restrictions cannot and
will not apply to the GPL'd content.
LeeE
--
Come build with us
for an approaching source.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile
On Friday 16 Oct 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
leee wrote:
I think you need to accept that many aircraft are indeed
broken, and most have been broken by software changes made
since the aircraft was released.
No, I don't have to.
Well, I'm afraid that you're in denial then.
I _do_ accept
, of the
heading/roll controllers is at a minimum but as the degree of roll
increases, the gain of the controllers is increased too, which
increases their authority.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference
.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
On Wednesday 14 Oct 2009, Alan Teeder wrote:
-Original Message-
From: leee [mailto:l...@spatial.plus.com]
Did you try scheduling your autoplilot´s height-error to
pitch demand gain with 1/V (speed inverse) ?
Alan
Re-read the end of the paragraph after the one you
in the shorter time
period.
Did you try scheduling your autoplilot´s height-error to pitch
demand gain with 1/V (speed inverse) ?
Alan
Re-read the end of the paragraph after the one you quoted above ;-)
LeeE
--
Come build
On Sunday 11 Oct 2009, Alan Teeder wrote:
-Original Message-
From: leee [mailto:l...@spatial.plus.com]
ie if u stick in a new value to the FDM then it will react..
That sucks in my oioiion.. I how have to create my own craqo
to make the model. that sucks to me..
pete
, and it is very rewarding when you finally
get them working.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing
and coming to terms with them that we will stand any chance
of preventing them from occurring again.
LeeE
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend
than
contributing to the debate you've chosen to try to personally
belittle and attack me, whilst spuriously implying that I'm a
racist on the basis of absolutely nothing.
In the end though, that's really your problem, not mine.
LeeE
bit respect?
Yes, I do know all this stuff. Why should you think that I don't?
I don't think that I've shown any disrespect, other than to those
who would rather deny the truth instead of facing up to it.
LeeE
--
Come
that I couldn't let it pass. Hopefully, it'll die
soon.
I've answered a couple of responses, one reasonable and one not,
imo, but I'll shut up about it now as I've really said all that I
think I needed to.
LeeE
--
Come
out the correct
instructions for themselves.
LeeE
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do
that the 'note' was unnecessary as
all it achieved was to aggressively suggest that the poster was
lazy or stupid.
Sure, people can be lazy _and_ stupid, but I can't see that
attacking them for being so is the best way to do anything about
it.
LeeE
On Friday 11 Sep 2009, Curtis Olson wrote
. A relatively little known fact is that Balsa is
actually a hardwood :-)
LeeE
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment
On Friday 07 Aug 2009, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, leee wrote:
I'm just wondering how much hardwood there is in Sweden.
Sweden's Firs might have been ok for the masts and spars but
hardwood was needed for the hull and superstructure, typically
Oak for the keel and frames
On Wednesday 05 Aug 2009, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, leee wrote:
Fair enough. To be honest, the question was at the limits of
my understanding. What inspired it though is that when I'm
rendering any of my 3D stuff the rendering process is
distributed across
by this; they
have achieved an immense amount by getting FG to this point, but in
getting FG this far they've made FG into a bigger thing that needs
handling differently if it isn't going to stagnate and be left
behind.
LeeE
On Tuesday 04 Aug 2009, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:05 AM, leee l...@spatial.plus.com
wrote:
That's interesting. Could you elaborate on that a little more
i.e. did you split a single scene into 'render boxes' or were
you, in effect, running four discrete
On Friday 17 Jul 2009, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, leee wrote:
The X/YB-35/49s certainly suffered from yaw instability
problems; in one YB-49 bomb run test it took the pilot four
minutes to stabilise the aircraft, during which time the
bombardier became airsick
]/visibility-m=1
--prop:environment/config/aloft/entry/visibility-m=2
--prop:environment/config/aloft/entry[1]/visibility-m=3
--prop:environment/config/aloft/entry[2]/visibility-m=4
LeeE
--
Enter
too, of the Arup at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nxz1UF67EQI
You can see the V-173 at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfpTDOAfj7Y
and also worth looking at, in the context of the Horten and other
flying wings, is the Armstrong Whitworth AW-52:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H1tyMRtcho
LeeE
tracking the cvs version of FG and either
use one of the stable versions or stick with a single cvs snapshot;
you're quite likely to find your work broken by subsequent
development code changes if you try to keep up to date with cvs.
LeeE
Subject line says it all really.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/02/nav_robothopter_flight_phase_ii/
LeeE
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel
/30/nasa_japan_release_99_complete_topographic_map/
LeeE
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
On Wednesday 01 Jul 2009, leee wrote:
Just a heads-up to say that it seems that the ASTER 30 metre
resolution world topographic data has been released, covering 83
degrees north to 93 degrees south.
Apparently NASA is currently working to combine this with the
SRTM data that FG already uses
There's a download link at the end of the article, but the article
also points out that it seems a bit overloaded atm.
Hi Lee,
Have you seen a download link?
Curt.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:25 AM, leee wrote:
Just a heads-up to say that it seems that the ASTER 30 metre
resolution
)
mailinglist.
Christian
Yes, I wouldn't expect the data to be perfect, but I would imagine
that the idea behind combining it with the SRTM data is to help
identify errors in both datasets so that they can be corrected.
It'll be the combined dataset that will be most useful, of course.
LeeE
world
characteristics, and certainly closer than you could get with a
wing and mstab combination.
LeeE
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel
On Friday 26 Jun 2009, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi LeeE
leee schrieb am 26.06.2009 13:57:
I just thought I'd point out that the YASim solver sets the
incidence for the hstab element, not the wing element.
Thanks for correcting me. I checked the code. The only difference
between wing and mstab
than myself.
LeeE
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server
On Friday 12 Jun 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
[snip...]
... I simply don't want to write files that use the more
verbose alternative...
[snip...]
I must commend your honesty.
LeeE
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime
be a good idea to think in terms of either re-naming the
current 'Generic' FCS so that it's clearly a generic Heli FCS, or
re-designing the 'Generic' FCS so that it is modular, with truly
generic modules, applicable to any type of vehicle, and separate
vehicle type-specific modules.
LeeE
at specific points on the
aircraft and so act at those points. It might be possible then to
hack the YASim FDM about a bit to remove the need to solve for
cruise and approach conditions and just use the gear drag bits,
which could then be placed and animated to simulate a human body.
LeeE
they're atomic values but if it's decided
that they should be represented by compound values, and it makes as
much sense to use them for lat, lon alt, or pitch, roll yaw, as
using them anywhere else, you'd have to write some code to parse
them first.
LeeE
; if
you've got an absolute lat/lon it's easy enough to find the
relative offsets using the Nasal Geo functions.
LeeE
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
LeeE wrote:
I've been following this but I don't remember anyone, in either
camp, pointing out where it brings a significant performance
increase, or where the failure to adopt it will result in a
significant performance drop. I specifically
, and not if, someone someone tries to do so?
If the new datatypes cannot be used everywhere, is there going to
be somewhere in the documentation that lists exactly where it can
and can't be used, baring in mind that it is normal to add new
branches and nodes to the tree as required?
LeeE
to enable an
otherwise impossible feature but at the same time introduces the
scope for new errors whilst breaking the consistency of the current
data atomicity.
LeeE
On Sunday 05 April 2009, Curtis Olson wrote:
I agree that the property system is for generic data ... so
adding color_vectors
represents data unless the overhead of accessing
three or four property tree nodes, instead of just one, has a
significant impact on performance.
How frequently does this data need to be accessed?
LeeE
the caustic colours will
average out.
LeeE
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Monday 30 March 2009, George Patterson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE l...@xx..com
wrote:
On Sunday 29 March 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 01:55 -0700, syd adams wrote:
I have to agree here ... seems pointless to keep them in cvs
if gerard
makes much more sense.
LeeE
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
to
duplicate effort to deal with it.
In conclusion, this proposal just seems designed to slightly reduce
the workload for the primary-developer at the expense of increasing
the workload for the user-developers, at the same time rendering
the interface inconsistent and ambiguous.
LeeE
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
LeeE wrote:
On Friday 20 March 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
RFC: Vector Types in the Property System
Proposal: Allow vector types as properties in property list
XML files and as properties in the runtime property system.
[snip...]
Rationale
to prototype the algorithms.
LeeE
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation
, and
perhaps implemented or prototyped in Nasal,]
A[a]dding new property tree branches and nodes to handle your unique
data presents no problems.
If you need to cut it down you can take out the examples []. You
can then give examples once you've got their attention.
LeeE
of
software being brought forward much more quickly than with Debian.
LeeE
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills
retract and
linkage compression animations etc. animate correctly by just
using the rudder control; because you have to run to full sim to
check your animations, retracting the gear while on the ground will
just crash the aircraft.
LeeE
for the sfric dfric gear sub-elements?
LeeE
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly
and animation code already
exists.
LeeE
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* LeeE -- Tuesday 03 February 2009:
Have the people having bad problems with this tried increasing
the values for the sfric dfric gear sub-elements?
Yes, of course. I really, really hope that I haven't forgotton
about other, similarly
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* LeeE -- Tuesday 03 February 2009:
Do you still get problems if you set the windspeed to zero?
Yes. With pretty much the same sliding speed.
m.
That's interesting, and a bit at odds with what I've experienced.
LeeE
On Tuesday 03 February 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* LeeE -- Tuesday 03 February 2009:
Have the people having bad problems with this tried increasing
the values for the sfric dfric gear sub-elements?
Yes, of course. I really, really hope that I haven't forgotton
about other, similarly
that are configurable in the aircraft to provide
backwards compatibility and avoid the need for mass updates of the
aircraft every time something changes.
LeeE
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
are using an unfeasibly low visibility
range.
LeeE
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
element.
LeeE
--
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Jon Stockill wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Oh yeah, and if the model is using the standard FG VRP (Visual
Reference Point) to align the 3D model and FDM config, ax ay
(and nearly always az) should all be 0.0. az might be
different in some aircraft, like the Nimrod MR
worthwhile.
Regards,
LeeE
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
of hours composing this
post is not to annoy diss people but because I care. If I
didn't, I wouldn't have bothered. And at least I waited until
after xmas so I didn't spoil it for anyone:)
Happy new year,
LeeE
On Monday 08 December 2008, gerard robin wrote:
On dimanche 07 décembre 2008, LeeE wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2008, gerard robin wrote:
On dimanche 07 décembre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
On samedi 06 décembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
gerard robin wrote:
With the c172p i
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
