Hello Everybody,
This is just a quick announcement / heads-up: FSWeekend, the largest Flight
Simulation event in europe being organized on November 1st and 2nd, at
Lelystad airport (EHLE). As in previous years, I'm planning to organize a
booth, in close collaboration with Martin Spott and Torst
Hi Czaba,
Done!. Out of Curiosity: On which system did you see the error? I'm working
on Suse Linux 11.0 (64 bit), and everything compiled just fine.
Cheers,
Durk
On Thursday 21 August 2008 21:52:05 Csaba Halász wrote:
> Somebody please add config.h to AirportList.cxx, because the #include
>
On Thursday 31 July 2008 21:22, Durk Talsma wrote:
> For the adventurous, I've also posted a snapshot of the current code
> (source only). Feedback is appreciated.
>
For those interested, here's another snapshot of the current in development
code of the tra
On Friday 22 August 2008 09:58:20 Martin Spott wrote:
> This is a compressed tar file which mistakenly has a different filename
> suffix,
>
Oh, yikes. Things were running a little late yesterday when I posted this.
I'll try to replace the data file with a proper zip tomorrow.
Cheers,
Durk
On Sunday 24 August 2008 04:38:36 Csaba Halász wrote:
> At least 3 of us get immediate segfault most of the time if starting
> at LFPG. I got various backtraces, mostly from OSG.
> Sometimes there is a warning similar to this:
> Warning: deleting still referenced object 0xb2de7f08 of type
> 'PN3osg
Hi Tim,
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 15:37:19 Tim Moore wrote:
>
> This is great! We can't call osgDB:SharedStateManager::share from the
> database pager thread. I'll check in a fix soon.
>
Great to hear that this stack trace was useful. :-)
Cheers,
Durk
-
Hi Michael,
I am currrently working on a relatively limited internet connections, but let
me weight in and add a few comments below.
On Friday 05 September 2008 01:18:24 Michael Smith wrote:
> Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> > But the problem could also be triggered by some other piece of code that
>
Hi Folks,
As of September 1st, I accepted a new job, and I'm currently still in the
aftermath off finishing my home-improvement duties. On top of that, something
has gone terribly wrong with moving my ADSL line, so I'm effectively still
without an internet connection at home. Last year I volunt
Hi Stuart,
On Saturday 04 October 2008 15:45:07 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Here's a current screenshot showing my progress:
>
> http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/clouds.jpg
>
Looks great! I really hope we can include some 3D clouds in the next release.
Keep up the good work. :-)
Cheers,
Durk
Hi,
On Saturday 04 October 2008 12:20:31 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> --- On Sat, 4/10/08, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > I like the idea of an 1.9 release from the OSG branch. This
> > makes clear that it's one step before a major release 2.0,
> > and that there were fundamental changes (additions and als
Hi All,
As mentioned by Curt on previous occasions, one of the more labour intense
parts of managing a release consists of the compilation of a comprehensible
revision log that lists the major changes / improvements to FlightGear. I
would appreciate it if somebody would give a hand in compiling
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include: Completeness,
variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo flights (think of
aerotowing, AI/Multiplayer refueling, carri
Hi Alexis,
On Sunday 05 October 2008 20:47:36 Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
> Hi all, here is a major update for the Tomcat. (feed back welcome)
>
> Note about the" Call for aircrafts nominations": the F-14b is heavy, and
> it's not going to be improved. I also plan to work on more fps-killing
> featu
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 01:35:55 Syd wrote:
> Could someone apply the patch please , and I'll start commiting textures .
> Thanks
Done. Thanks!
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challeng
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 22:11:50 Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Some screenshots, not perfect but maybe worth sharing:
> http://www.t3r.de/fg/seneca-landing-lights.jpg
> http://www.t3r.de/fg/seneca-landing-lights-2.jpg
>
> Stay tuned for more - hopefully to be ready for the FSWeekend in
> Lelystad...
>
Hi Curt,
On Friday 24 October 2008 18:38:46 Curtis Olson wrote:
> I've been speaking with a manufacturer of graphics related hardware device.
> Let me just keep it generic for now, even if the list of names to guess
> from isn't very long.
>
> 2. Since this is marketing, wow, it would really make
Hi Everybody,
This is just a quick reminder:
The "Aviodrome" aviation museum at Lelystad Airport (EHLE), is organizing
FSWeekend again this coming weekend (Nov 1 & 2). FlightGear is organizing a
booth, for the third time in succession.
This year's crew will consist of Martin Spott, Torsten D
Hi Gerard,
On Monday 27 October 2008 17:37:22 gerard robin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if it is just me, and the Boeing aircrafts being frightened
> by the French Aircrafts, i get on KSFO that funny scenery animation.
>
> The animated aircrafts, on the tarmac, randomly jump on the top of
HI Folks,
I just came back from the annual FSWeekend fair in Lelystad, and thought I'd
share some impressions. Last week has been quite busy, so I feel very strongly
about having a relaxed evening and enjoy a glass of wine (try to spot an
increase in typing errors toward the end of this message
Hi Torsten,
>> >
> Want pictures?
>
> http://www.t3r.de/flightpics/fsweekend2008/
>
>
Sending this from work by webmail: let's hope it works:
Here's a quote from the X-plane.org forum:
"At FSWeekend there was a guy from the open-source flight simulator
FlightGear too. He had this large FlightGe
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 21:26:18 Syd wrote:
Hi Syd,
> Ok my turn :)
> I found Ron's comment about not being welcome to create scenery a bit
> disturbing ... why?
Just to make a slightly off thread comment: All I can say is that Ron's
comments on this list have been courteous and professional
On Thursday 21 August 2008 23:11:12 Durk Talsma wrote:
> The main improvement of the current code is that I've switched to a more
> efficient search mechanism to link Aircraft and Flights. There are still a
> few things left to do before the code is ready for CVS:
>
> - Switch
On Sunday 16 November 2008 00:02:13 Durk Talsma wrote:
> I believe that the code has now matured enough to give it a wider audience.
> Therefore, I intend to commit this code tomorrow. I will also commit a
> small sample of the EHAM demo that we are working on.
>
Done. I have als
Just to approach the perspective of a new release from a slightly different
angle. I would indeed like to start piecing it all together. As I mentioned
previously, my last three months have been rather hectic. Starting a new job,
moving, and being without an internet connection for nearly two mo
Hi Gerard,
On Sunday 16 November 2008 15:22:50 gerard robin wrote:
> could you include the Caudron C684
>
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/images/f/fa/C684-1.png
>
> Great Aircraft, Model, FDM, Cockpit ...
> It should be able to pretend.
>
> Cheers
Thanks for pointing out this little gem. I took
On Sunday 16 November 2008 20:34:48 Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
> Small? I think people with lower computer perfomance will have problems-
> but there is always --proportion=1.0
Ah yes, the one file I committed does contain the singlemost largest operator
at EHAM. The sample is "small" in the sense tha
On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:13:54 Durk Talsma wrote:
> While I'm at it. :-)
>
> With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
> highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
> Completeness, variability across categories, real
Hi Everybody,
I just placed the sources and base package for the pending FlightGear 1.9
release on my webserver:
http://durktalsmal.xs4all.nl/SimGear-1.99.5.tar.gz
http://durktalsmal.xs4all.nl/FlightGear-1.99.5.tar.gz
http://durktalsmal.xs4all.nl/FlightGear-data-1.99.5.tar.bz2
Please note that
Hi Fred,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 18:25:46 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Durk Talsma a écrit :
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > I just placed the sources and base package for the pending FlightGear 1.9
> > release on my webserver:
> >
> > http://durktalsmal.xs4all.n
Hi Ron,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 18:43:43 Ron Jensen wrote:
> Erik just synced JSBSim about 7 hours before this message. Did those
> updates make it into the release candidate?
>
Yes, I did a full cvs up about three hours before rolling up the tarfiles, so
I guess these latest JSBSim changes
Hi Stuart,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 20:08:12 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> The lack of a helicopter seems like an omission.
>
The bo105 is actually in the base package. It looks like it just dropped out
of the list I posted.
More comments later.
Cheers,
Durk
---
On Thursday 04 December 2008 14:42:02 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:20:51 -, Gordon (UK) wrote in message
>
> >
> > Now, I'm working in Visual Studio. However, how the devil do I set up
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ apt-cache show ccache distcc
[ Lots of uninformative text deleted ]
Hi Fred,
Yikes. That's probably a resulting from getting my triple screen setup
working. Agreed that shouldn't go into CVS. Thanks for catching this.
Cheers,
Durk
On Sunday 07 December 2008 12:54:17 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Frederic Bouvier a écrit :
> > Durk Talsm
On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:21:19 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> To be clear, the problematic preferences.xml was found in
> FlightGear-data-1.99.5.tar.bz2 , not in CVS.
>
Ah, yes. That's what I meant. This change slipped from my local distribution
into the RC. It's never been in CVS. Sorry for the
Gentlemen,
Thanks for all your comments on the 1.99.5 RC1 files. The last two weeks have
been rather bizarre for me actually. Not only did I spend a whole weekend in
Canada for the final meeting final meeting of my former research group, I also
ended up spending three days in Amsterdam to finis
Hi Rob,
On Monday 08 December 2008 13:33:16 Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > F14 : Omnipowerful Jet Fighter; has so many features, it is
> > very well capable of representing the category "Fighter Jet"
> > - I'm still having tr
Hi James,
On Monday 08 December 2008 11:54:15 James Turner wrote:
> I would appreciate help on the instrument side - I know Syd has
> created parts of the KLN90 for the B1900, and I'll keep that working
> and hopefully enhance it in parallel with the KLN89B work. The two
> seem to share an awful l
Hi Heiko,
On Monday 08 December 2008 10:33:29 Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
> No- I think the dhc2 is easy to start and beginners will like it to play
> with the switches to start th ac! A good step to learn the basics
>
It's actually not that hard, but I seem to remember that last year's version
w
On Monday 08 December 2008 21:59:53 I wrote:
> Can't tell whether this is related, but I just noticed a problem with the
> b1900d's ILS localizer. I tried a little circuit: starting off at EHAM park
> position B01, taxied to runway 36L, made a 90 deg right, for about a
> minute, then a 180 right, u
Hi Everybody,
Just to follow up to my previous mail regarding the prereleases. I hope to
roll out another release candidate tomorrow evening (CET). As for the aircraft
selection, I would like to make the following changes:
- Remove Concorde and replace by the following two aircraft: 1) On of t
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 20:42:26 gerard robin wrote:
> On mercredi 10 décembre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source
> > In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9843
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > Makefile.am
> >
Hi Gerard,
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 13:08:57 gerard robin wrote:
> Is it only philosophy, from me ?
> Am i alone to think like that ?
> Or, is there here, now, more "gamer" and less "serious" persons. ?
>
I'm puzzled...
As far as I can tell there has never been any question regaring our st
Hi Alasdair,
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 22:26:14 Alasdair Campbell wrote:
>
> Browsing through the output reveals many KLM scheduled flights, many of
> which contain the (missing) destination LGPG. (And lots more interesting
> stuff)
>
> Can I suggest that LGPG be replaced with LFPG (Charles de
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Please find FlightGear 1.99.5-RC2 ready for download. In order to relieve my
humble server, John Wojnaroski has kindly provided some space on his server to
host the source and base package. Please find the relevant files here:
http://www.lfstech.com/pub/flightgear/
In add
Earlier this week I received a request to update the 787 by an improved
version. Obviously, I'd be happy to do so, and I believe that the GPL licence
would give me the right to do so without further notice.
In line with our defacto policy that every aircraft has a prime developer, I
would like
I've already mentioned a few times previously that I'm going to be out of
town for a couple of months. I'm flying out to KSFO tomorrow, and will then
head to Canada around April 17th, where I will stay for two months, for work
related projects.
It's been a pleasure to have contributed to the c
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
I recall Durk Talsma was once telling about an in-house (closed source)
fgfs-based system with a huge number of AI planes, in the tens of
thousands IIRC. Probably not all talking to the same tower though?
Yes, I have indeed a database of worldwide traffic at home
Dave Culp wrote:
As far as I know the "--flight-plan=*" option has nothing to do with AI. AI
flight plans are defined within each of the scenario file.
Yep, that's correct. The --flight-plan option refers to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] type flightplan for the user controlled aircraft. Not
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
The triangles don't have to be changed at all because in our Scenery
the tidal area is part of the ocean. The idea was about changing
nothing but the colour,
Ok, so you are only talking about areas that are marked explicitly as
tidal areas in our
Hi Dene,
It sounds like this would be a job for the traffic manager system, which
has more or less all the capabilities you describe (arrival, taxiway
following, wait until next flight, etc etc). I'll put some documentation
regarding the design of trafficmanager scripts once I'm back home (in
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 12 June 2006 13:53:
>
>> Of course, this is a bad example, as those extensions make the format
>> basically useless for any other purpose than for the AI subsystem. No
>> other subsystem in fgfs can load them, which is why I would rather get
>>
On Friday 23 June 2006 17:08, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> This looks like it could be an interesting event if anyone is in the
> neighborhood. Does anyone want to look into organizing a FlightGear
> presence there?
>
> Curt.
Looks interesting indeed. I'll probably send out an inquiry to find out wh
On Saturday 24 June 2006 12:10, Martin Spott wrote:
> Mathias Fr??hlich wrote:
> > No really a presence, but I will be there together with Martin.
>
> I see, last LinuxTag hast started to lay the foundation of an
> international FlightGear exhibition crew :-))
>
> Martin.
Not only _last_ Li
Hi all,
I'm investigating a time-offset initialization problem, related to a broken
--time-match-local command line option. This option should set the local
simulator time to the same time as where I am in real life. For example, I am
located in a CET timezone, where it is 13:15, and want to fl
e sure that the
> --timeofday=dawn,noon,morning,night,etc. option still works correctly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Curt.
>
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm investigating a time-offset initialization problem, related to a
> > broken --time-match-l
On Saturday 01 July 2006 13:21, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Considering that this function is called Init, I believe that the statement
> on line 1413 is wrong. An init function should not carry over existing
> values or the very variable it is supposed to initialize. Therefore, I'm
> i
On Monday 10 July 2006 18:27, Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
> While you're at it, why not look for a spot at the Flight Simulator
> Weekend, Nov. 4 and 5, 2006, Aviodrome Aviation Museum, Lelystad.
> (That's the weekend following the Linux World Expo). As a simbuilder I
> already have a place there,
On Sunday 09 July 2006 19:03, Mark wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've been experimenting with a redone implementation of the sun in simgear.
> My goal is to create a more acurate looking sun that also has more
> variability in its appearance.
> I'm pretty much done and like to ask for comments and
On Thursday 20 July 2006 20:31, Mark wrote:
> P.S.: Who can I send patches for simgear without penetrating the list?
You can send them to me; I'd be happy to include this patch.
Cheers,
Durk
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influe
Hi all,
Ealier today, I posted a message here indicating my intentions of committing
the airway database code into CVS. For some reason, that email still hasn't
appeared on the list.
In the mean time, however, I decided to go ahead and submit the code anyways.
I had a few reasons for this 1)
Hi all,
I still have some code lingering around that reads and parses the contents of
the FlightGear/ x-plane airway database (awy.dat.gz). I've never committed
that code, because of the pre version 1.0 feature freeze period we were in.
As it appears, plans have changed somewhat in this respe
On Sunday 30 July 2006 09:29, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> I just noticed these 2 daunting warnings burried in a bunched of warning
> for unused local variables :
>
> ( translated from french by me )
> i:\devel\flightgear\src\aimodel\aiflightplancreate.cxx(451) : warning
> C4700: local variable 'lat2'
On Friday 11 August 2006 23:43, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while debugging Maik's multiplayer problems, Olaf and I experienced some
> problems in groudnetwork.cxx.
>
> At the end of the FGGroundNetwork::trance() there are two pop_back's where
> the second one poped an non existent last entry
On Sunday 13 August 2006 21:34, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi Durk,
>
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 00:32, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Btw, where did you experience these problems (which airport), and how did
> > they manifest themselves? Program crashes? I've been runn
Hey Folks,
Okay, it looks like I just managed to accomplish a significant breaktrough in
AI traffic control for AIModels. I've set up a ground controller that
monitors each taxiing aircraft's position and slows down those that are
following too close. So far, I've only implimented a speed adjus
Hi Everyone,
It's been a while since the last significant update to the AI aircraft
downloads website. So I thought it would be time for a significant overhaul.
In addition to adding many new paint schemes to existing aircraft, I've also
added two new AI aircraft; the Airbus A320, and the Boein
About two years ago, a rather nice model of the Lockheed L1011 Tristar was
contributed by Tiago Gusmao. I have downloaded the model, added it to my
local base package and had assumed it would be in CVS or on a local hangar.
I more or less forgot about the model's status, but today while investi
It may not be very well known, but FlightGear not only tracks the position of
the sun, moon, and stars, but also those of the planets. This is done only
for the 8 nearest planets, because there doesn't exist an accurate or simple,
publically available model for pluto's orbit, or at least it wasn
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:35, Simon Hollier wrote:
> On 8/30/06, Curtis L. Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone confirm that the CH Products yoke and pedals work out of the
> > box with FlightGear v0.9.10?
>
> The CH USB 3 axis yoke and USB rudder pedals work out of the box for me o
Dear FlightGear developers and users,
As discussed briefly before on these lists, on November 5 and 5, the annual
Flight Simulator days will be held in The Aviodrome air museum at Lelystad
airport in the Netherlands (http://www.aviodrome.nl/). I had already
expressed interest in organizing a Fl
On Sunday 17 September 2006 12:43, Martin Spott wrote:
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > As discussed briefly before on these lists, on November 5 and 5, [...]
>
> ^ 6 ?
Hmm, November 4 and 5. Too early in the morning, and not
Hi,
Yesterday I found that FlightGear began thashing my memory. After running for
about 4-5 hours, it had filled up all available memory (1 Gig Ram + 1 Gig
swapspace). Therefore, I decided to try and run flightgear through valgrind.
http://durktalsma.xs4all.nl/valgrind.log
There are a number
On Monday 18 September 2006 07:30, Martin Spott wrote:
> Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
> > I might be able to donate a few bits of hardware (yoke etc) to the FG
> > booth and if someone is capable of doing a pickup from the Eindhoven
> > region, I can do a lot more, [...]
>
> Well, the way from Moen
I just updated the AI Aircraft website, which can be found at:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~dtalsma/flightgear.html
Highlights of this month's update are a nice Boeing 757 model, build by Innis
Cunningham, as well as several Airbus 330 and A340 aircraft, which were
originally build by Camil Valiquett
On Monday 25 September 2006 21:18, Lou Sanchez-Chopitea wrote:
> Hi,
>I have just started trying to get FG to run on a new system. I have
> assembled a box based on a Tyan MB with two Athlon MP 2000+ with 2GB of
> ram, running Fedora Core 5. I get segfaults in both the yum installed FG
> and a
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 20:01, Lou Sanchez-Chopitea wrote:
> Hi,
> I am beginning to look at the code, initially tracking down memory
> errors reported by valgrind, eventually with a goal of getting it to run
> on my system. I have one fix so far. What is the procedure for putting
> or sub
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:28, Andy Ross wrote:
> Finally, please make sure you remove *all* traces of FlightGear and
> SimGear from you system before doing a
>
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Lou Sanchez-Chopitea wrote:
> > > I have assembled a box based on a Tyan
Hi Fred,
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 22:07, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Hi Durk,
>
> I am still unclear about the way to reproduce what you are seeing. The
> aircraft_demo not repeating is only creating a single AI object. Hard to
> see a huge memory leak with just this single occurence. How do y
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:43, Geoff Air wrote:
>
> PS: I have sometimes wondered where the AI planes
> go, and was 'startled' to find that after chasing
> one in the UFO - giving the passengers something
> to talk about - it simply 'disappears' after reaching
> about 27,000 feet, maybe 10 m
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 22:42, Durk Talsma wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 22:07, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's what I thought initially as well, but it doesn't look like it.
> I added the delete statement in the distructor, and still have the l
On Sunday 01 October 2006 01:51, Darko Tasovac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanx to Durk's tutorial about ground network, I created a few parking &
> runwayuse.xml files but I have a few questions:
Cool. Did you use taxidraw?
>
> 1. Is there any documentation about default.approach, default.ground,
> airpor
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 01:42, Darko Tasovac wrote:
> > Cool. Did you use taxidraw?
>
> Yes, and like you mentioned, it crashes sometimens when undo function is
> used.
>
Yeah, sorry about that. I just haven't figured out yet why it crashes, so
without that fixing it is hard. :-).
In the mean
On Friday 06 October 2006 12:31, Geoff Air wrote:
> Friday, 06 October 2006.
>
> Minor change to avoid (MSVC8) debug assertion
>
> Oops - While running FG in Debug mode, to check some
> other code, I get a debug assertion in groundnetwork.cxx,
> which stops me getting to the code I want to
> see ;=
On Friday 06 October 2006 12:39, Darko Tasovac wrote:
> Will TaxiDraw be able to put names to taxi segment instead of "AI
> waypoint node"? It will be useful for ground control in the process of
> guiding the plane on the ground.
>
Yes that's the plan. I'll need to investigate what the best way f
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 22:02, Buchanan, Stuart wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Some of you may have come across www.flightaware.com as a way to track IFR
> flights. It uses data from the FAA radar system and provides products
> (free and commercial) based on it. The data is quite detailed -
> minute-by-mi
On Thursday 21 September 2006 21:29, Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
> Martin Spott schreef:
> > Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
> >> I might be able to donate a few bits of hardware (yoke etc) to the FG
> >> booth and if someone is capable of doing a pickup from the Eindhoven
> >> region, I can do a lot
I just checked in a few changes I needed to make to SimGear to enable
compilation on my recent reinstall of cygwin. Most of it is fairly minor, and
doesn't appear to breaking my linux build.
Since I can only test on Linux and Cygwin, I thought I'd post a quick
notification of this change. I do
Hi All,
In keeping with my tradition of tracking the AI developments in screenshots,
I've just added a few new ones to the gallery.
The new section starts here:
http://durktalsma.xs4all.nl/FlightGear/web/59.html
I've been working on building ground networks for a number of major airports,
and
On Sunday 29 October 2006 17:50, Darko Tasovac wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the main goal of AI subsystem traffic pattern, do you plan the
> traffic pattern to be the realistic one, or random airliner flights to
> random destinaton?
>
> Google Earth and TaxiDraw connection is a jackpot :)
>
> Regar
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 19:06, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Maik Justus -- Wednesday 01 November 2006 18:51:
> > don't forget the improvements in the multiplayer code.
>
> Oh, yes. And also ...
>
> - many improvements to the traffic manager
>
> (probably not a teaser either, as long as the
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 20:28, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> [traffic manager]
>
> * Durk Talsma -- Wednesday 01 November 2006 20:18:
> > On Wednesday 01 November 2006 19:06, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > as long as the aircraft are hovering 30 m in the air
> >
> &g
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 21:10, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Wednesday 01 November 2006 20:50:
> > That's one area that needs improving.
>
> And here's another: FlightGear just decided to exit for no
> acceptable reason in the middle of a harmless
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 21:49, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Durk Talsma -- Wednesday 01 November 2006 21:46:
> > Yikes! That's not supposed to happen. You can safely comment out the
> > exit(), as FlightGear has a fallback mechanism in case no route is found.
>
>
Hi folks,
Okay, here's is a quick update from the FSWeekend.One FlightGear
developer, who wishes to remain anonymous, Robin, and I are currently
back in Amsterdam, enjoying (a) beer(s), after a very insightful first
day at the FlightGear booth. We were very pleasantly surprised by the
overall
Joacim Persson wrote:
> While investigating this I noticed these lines in src/AIModel/AIManager.cxx
> in method ssgBranch * FGAIManager::getModel(const string& path) (line 262)
>
> ...(while iterating over all loaded models):
>if (i->getNumRefs() == 1)
> {
>i = loadedMo
On Monday 06 November 2006 20:10, Darko Tasovac wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a questions about traffic patterns rules...
>
> Are folder names in the data/Traffic folder airliner's ICAO or should
> be named with full airliner name?
>
>
Currently there is no official "rule", but for consistency I wo
On Monday 06 November 2006 11:29, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Curtis Olson" wrote:
> > Good job Durk and Robin, thanks for the report and for all your work!
>
> Seconded,
> Martin.
> P.S.: ;-))
Thanks (BIG :-))! Hope you had a good trip home.
Okay, I promised some pictures now that my linux bo
Hey list,
I just tried upgrading to Open Scene Graph, and got the following error while
trying to compile SimGear:
f g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../simgear -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include
-g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -MT visual_enviro.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/visual_enviro.Tpo"
-c -o visual_enviro.o vi
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 08:57, Martin Spott wrote:
> Mhhh, could you make sure your CVS tree is up to date and clean ? I did
> a build from yesterday evening's CVS on Linux with GCC-3.4 (Debian
> Sarge on AMD64; GCC-3.3 throws an ICE with current PLIB SVN) plus one
> this morning after Mathias'
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 16:50, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Threads impose a huge penalty in terms of complicating the code, hiding
> really subtle bugs, and maintaining threaded code over time just
> complicates this matter because new people come in and make changes when
> they don't fully understan
601 - 700 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
