Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS Menu

2012-10-31 Thread Curtis Olson
See if pressing "F10" get's it back for you. On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Donn Washburn wrote: > Hey Group; > > What has happened to the upper screen menu in fgfs. I downloaded the > latest Git version and it is gone > > -- > 73 de Donn Washburn > 1803 Oaklawn Email > Sugar Land, TX 77498-

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs command line parameters will not take precedence over .fgfsrc

2012-08-07 Thread Curtis Olson
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Wolfgang Rostek wrote: > Hi all, > > I was playing around with two different scenery directories. > > It takes me some time to recognize that the value from ~/.fgfsrc > is used and not the command line parameter 'fgfs --fg-scenery=...' > in the first place. > > What

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs libz question

2011-09-09 Thread Sid Boyce
Use cut & paste into your emails as the attachments don't appear in replies and all context is lost. You have got to pay attention to the configure option "--libdir=" when building on a 64-bit system. In openSUSE /lib, /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib are for 32-bit, /lib64, /usr/lib64 and /usr/l

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:02:02 +0100, Sid wrote in message <4de797da.1060...@blueyonder.co.uk>: > On 02/06/11 14:12, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > * Donn Washburn -- Thursday 02 June 2011: > >>It also looks like they have messed with modprobe because it no > >> longer installs the needed file in /l

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-02 Thread Donn Washburn
On 06/02/2011 02:51 PM, Sid Boyce wrote: > On 02/06/11 15:44, Donn Washburn wrote: >> On 06/02/2011 09:24 AM, Melchior FRANZ wrote: >>> * Sid Boyce -- Thursday 02 June 2011: He insists on mixing 11.4 and 11.4 updates repos with factory >>> >>> Oh. One has to know that "factory" is meant for de

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-02 Thread Sid Boyce
On 02/06/11 15:44, Donn Washburn wrote: > On 06/02/2011 09:24 AM, Melchior FRANZ wrote: >> * Sid Boyce -- Thursday 02 June 2011: >>> He insists on mixing 11.4 and 11.4 updates repos with factory >> >> Oh. One has to know that "factory" is meant for developers -- for >> people who know how to fix bu

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-02 Thread Donn Washburn
On 06/02/2011 09:24 AM, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Sid Boyce -- Thursday 02 June 2011: >> He insists on mixing 11.4 and 11.4 updates repos with factory > > Oh. One has to know that "factory" is meant for developers -- for > people who know how to fix bugs and to submit patches. It's not > for people

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-02 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Sid Boyce -- Thursday 02 June 2011: > He insists on mixing 11.4 and 11.4 updates repos with factory Oh. One has to know that "factory" is meant for developers -- for people who know how to fix bugs and to submit patches. It's not for people who want the newest stuff, but are lazy and uninformed

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-02 Thread Sid Boyce
On 02/06/11 14:12, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Donn Washburn -- Thursday 02 June 2011: >>It also looks like they have messed with modprobe because it no longer >> installs the needed file in /lib/modules/kernel on any kernel but theirs > > I've been running (open)SuSE since version 5.2 (slack

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-02 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Donn Washburn -- Thursday 02 June 2011: > It also looks like they have messed with modprobe because it no longer > installs the needed file in /lib/modules/kernel on any kernel but theirs I've been running (open)SuSE since version 5.2 (slackware before that), and fgfs compiles and runs ju

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Sid Boyce
On 01/06/11 23:53, Donn Washburn wrote: > > Well I have tried several times and NV.run complains about the naming of > the kernel so I have always compiled the newer kernel without problems. >It also looks like they have messed with modprobe because it no longer > installs the needed file in /

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Donn Washburn
I agree Scott; My old machine worked so much better than this new one. NV didn't even know that they had no.runs for this card. I found one and told them about it. As I remember that It also work with fgfs. The nv.run I am running on is a openSuSE one. On 06/01/2011 05:22 PM, Scott wrote:

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Donn Washburn
On 06/01/2011 03:49 PM, Curtis Olson wrote: > I'm running fedora here, and I haven't rebuilt a kernel for my fedora > systems ever. So you shouldn't have to do that to install the nvidia > drivers. > > (For the record I build kernels and entire linux distributions from > source quite often for my

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi Donn, I'm running openSUSE 11.4 x64 and have a few days old GIT version of fg as well as fgdata - few minor bugs when I run fg (missing hud features, cannot manually set visibility distance with Z/z) but not like you describe. I can tell you that KDE4 kwin does not play nice with OpenGL app

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Sid Boyce
On 01/06/11 21:41, Donn Washburn wrote: > On 06/01/2011 03:25 PM, Curtis Olson wrote: >> Video drivers? I differ from Arnt's philosophy and make sure I run with >> nvidia graphics hardware + the nvidia drivers on all my linux machines >> ... seems like there are always problems with other vendors

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Scott
Hi ya Donn, I'm running OpenSuSE 11.3 on one box and 11.4 on another box, and I don't see the problem you are having, but I haven't recompiled everything for about 1 month now. The 11.3 has a nvidia card in it, and it is the best performing one, with the vendor driver. Both have AMD cpu

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Curtis Olson
I'm running fedora here, and I haven't rebuilt a kernel for my fedora systems ever. So you shouldn't have to do that to install the nvidia drivers. (For the record I build kernels and entire linux distributions from source quite often for my embedded system work, just not for my desktop PC runnin

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Donn Washburn
On 06/01/2011 03:25 PM, Curtis Olson wrote: > Video drivers? I differ from Arnt's philosophy and make sure I run with > nvidia graphics hardware + the nvidia drivers on all my linux machines > ... seems like there are always problems with other vendors and > open-source 3d drivers and opengl libs.

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2011-06-01 Thread Curtis Olson
Video drivers? I differ from Arnt's philosophy and make sure I run with nvidia graphics hardware + the nvidia drivers on all my linux machines ... seems like there are always problems with other vendors and open-source 3d drivers and opengl libs. It's good some people try these other paths and ho

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-29 Thread Donn Washburn
On 05/29/2011 03:41 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:28:48 -0500, Donn wrote in message > <4dd7da30.4020...@comcast.net>: > >> You are correct. I solved it here. It was a bad git version OSG. >> Yesterdays everything updated does work correctly. Except I still >> see aircraft flo

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-29 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:28:48 -0500, Donn wrote in message <4dd7da30.4020...@comcast.net>: > You are correct. I solved it here. It was a bad git version OSG. > Yesterdays everything updated does work correctly. Except I still > see aircraft floating above the runway ..yup, more bugs that needs

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-21 Thread Donn Washburn
On 05/21/2011 10:19 AM, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2011 21:29:15 -0500, Donn wrote in message > <4dd5d1fb.1010...@comcast.net>: > >> I am seeing a strange problem concerning either flightgear or fgdata. >> It has very large yellow letters on the bootsplash screen and then >> multiple big

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 19 May 2011 21:29:15 -0500, Donn wrote in message <4dd5d1fb.1010...@comcast.net>: > I am seeing a strange problem concerning either flightgear or fgdata. > It has very large yellow letters on the bootsplash screen and then > multiple big jets floating above the runway. I have seen as m

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-20 Thread Donn Washburn
>> >> On openSUSE with NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-270.41.06 driver. >> Regards >> Sid. >> > If have even seen the Tower/Terminal on the right side of the run way. > I rebooted fgfs and the building are now back on the left side again. > Nothing else is backward on anything I have tried. > > I have decided

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-20 Thread Donn Washburn
On 05/20/2011 05:57 PM, Sid Boyce wrote: > On 20/05/11 21:59, Sid Boyce wrote: >> On 20/05/11 17:28, Donn Washburn wrote: >>> On 05/20/2011 10:38 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: - Original Message > From: Donn Washburn > Add too this is a Big Jet flying backwards across the sc

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-20 Thread Sid Boyce
On 20/05/11 21:59, Sid Boyce wrote: > On 20/05/11 17:28, Donn Washburn wrote: >> On 05/20/2011 10:38 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: >>> - Original Message >>> From: Donn Washburn Add too this is a Big Jet flying backwards across the screen It was over 19L C172P. Tail first - k

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-20 Thread Sid Boyce
On 20/05/11 17:28, Donn Washburn wrote: > On 05/20/2011 10:38 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: >> - Original Message >> >>> From: Donn Washburn >>> Add too this is a Big Jet flying backwards across the screen It was over >>> 19L C172P. Tail first - kind of unique. >> >> Sounds like you've got

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-20 Thread Donn Washburn
On 05/20/2011 10:38 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > - Original Message > >> From: Donn Washburn >> Add too this is a Big Jet flying backwards across the screen It was over >> 19L C172P. Tail first - kind of unique. > > Sounds like you've got the AI Traffic Manager enabled, and it got confus

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs bootsplash

2011-05-20 Thread Stuart Buchanan
- Original Message > From: Donn Washburn > Add too this is a Big Jet flying backwards across the screen It was over > 19L C172P. Tail first - kind of unique. Sounds like you've got the AI Traffic Manager enabled, and it got confused. Try disabling the traffic manager, or AI models i

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-24 Thread Sid Boyce
On 22/11/10 15:37, Donn Washburn wrote: > I founf the problem. It was a slightly older Simgear source that caused > the problem. > > I will add to the openSuSE 11.4 M3 headaches which are likely going to > cause me to look at Ubuntu and dump openSuSE. > > 1. openSuSE has gone to KVM qnd nouveau wh

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2010-11-24 Thread Donn Washburn
Thanks That is what I thought also I will try and reload it again On 11/24/2010 12:33 AM, Tarot Jean-Sébastien wrote: > You have probably no good data package version!!! > > > On 11/23/10 22:06, Donn Washburn wrote: >> I hate to send out this error but it seems to be a Nasal problem. >> I am run

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS

2010-11-23 Thread Tarot Jean-Sébastien
You have probably no good data package version!!! On 11/23/10 22:06, Donn Washburn wrote: > I hate to send out this error but it seems to be a Nasal problem. > I am running openSuSE 11.4 M3 and it could be another openSuSE problem > or something I did not get compiled correctly. > This is a Nvid

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-22 Thread Sid Boyce
Donn, don't give openSUSE a bad name. All the main distributions, Fedora, Ubuntu, openSUSE, etc., etc. are level pegging as far as content is concerned and are quite solid. Whatever distro you use, you are going to meet old friends such as DRM/nouveau and of course KDE4. I have them running on

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-22 Thread Donn Washburn
Thanks for the reply! Well I am going to dump openSuSE because of over about the last 3 version nothing has been done to answer a reasonable question for about 6 month from openSuSE elist. Also among things that fail continuously are Blender, FlightGear fails, K3B will not look at any "."files

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Donn Washburn -- Monday 22 November 2010: > I will add to the openSuSE 11.4 M3 headaches which are likely going to > cause me to look at Ubuntu and dump openSuSE. Are you kidding? M3 is a *DEVELOPER* release. It's not meant for impatient end users. If you can't stand the heat ... wait for the a

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-22 Thread Donn Washburn
I founf the problem. It was a slightly older Simgear source that caused the problem. I will add to the openSuSE 11.4 M3 headaches which are likely going to cause me to look at Ubuntu and dump openSuSE. 1. openSuSE has gone to KVM qnd nouveau which NVidia.run will not work with. So remove the

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-22 Thread Jari Häkkinen
Hi, This is not really an error, and configure should probably not annotate these lines as WARNING. The configure scripts finds subversion headers but cannot use them because of some reason. As Frédéric points out you need to examine config.log for details. What happens (when I checked in Marc

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-22 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Donn Washburn" a écrit : > From a GIT version of late. It came out on the screen printout from > ./configure. Also 2 version of Flightgear on openSuSE 11.4 M3 are > showing the same error while running ./autogen.sh The obligatory step in such a case is to inspect config.log -Fred --

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS configure error

2010-11-21 Thread Sid Boyce
On 21/11/10 23:54, Donn Washburn wrote: > From a GIT version of late. It came out on the screen printout from > ./configure. Also 2 version of Flightgear on openSuSE 11.4 M3 are > showing the same error while running ./autogen.sh > > I don't see that here and I've just downloaded the git version.

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-04 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Thanks Geoff, like the contrasts page! Thought I'd do a comparison image... http://blobster.50webs.com/ybbn-comparison.jpg Its beginning to look more homely. Much to do yet however, as I've found some decent shapefiles on the net that will let me vastly improve the roads, rail, rive

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-04 Thread Geoff McLane
Hi Chris, A big congrats on getting it all together ;=)) I know well the steps and EFFORT required... while all the TG tools do, do-their-job, they take some time to use - as you said "4 years in the making..." So, how can we use, view this new scenery? Do you have somewhere you can upload say

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-03 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Geoff McLane -- Tuesday 02 June 2009: [ufo 'd'-key] > AND DUMPS MUCH MORE, including a Google Map reference > so you can immediately check it out in reality ;=)) BTW: the google maps link can be dumped from any aircraft. Just press :Ym (Y is for development related functions, m for map

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Chris Wilkinson
ped. Kind regards, Chris Wilkinson, YBBN/BNE. --- On Tue, 2/6/09, Geoff McLane wrote: From: Geoff McLane Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd... To: "FlightGear user discussions" Received: Tuesday, 2 June, 2009, 11:14 PM Hi Chris, Re: http://blobster.5

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Geoff McLane
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 17:38 +0200, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Geoff McLane -- Tuesday 02 June 2009: > > ./run_fgfs.sh --aircraft=ufo --fdm=ufo [...] > > > It is always good to give a viewing command, I > > think, so others can position themselves in > > exactly the same place ;=)) > > Yes. And the

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Geoff McLane -- Tuesday 02 June 2009: > ./run_fgfs.sh --aircraft=ufo --fdm=ufo [...] > It is always good to give a viewing command, I > think, so others can position themselves in > exactly the same place ;=)) Yes. And the ufo outputs exactly that if you press the 'd'-key ("dump"). No need to h

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Geoff McLane
Hi Chris, Re: http://blobster.50webs.com/ybbn-new.jpg It is always hard to guess with so little information, but it looks like your new scenery is just 'missing' the YBBN.btg.gz file... you have the 'hole' cut in the scenery where the a/p is to exist, but is not there to load into this hole...

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Jon Stockill
Chris Wilkinson wrote: > Hi there, > > http://blobster.50webs.com/ybbn-new.jpg > > Just to clarify with that image - the airport layout you see is a hole > in the terrain - all airports are like that, not just the one I altered. > The terrain itself has built fine; roads, railways, town, urban

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Curtis Olson
e files its looking for - the > files/folders it asks for simply are not there. > > I'm getting closer to figuring this out - might have to wait for next day - > need sleep - . > > Kind regards, > > Chris Wilkinson, YBBN/BNE. > > --- On *Tue, 2/6/09, Chris Wilkins

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Chris Wilkinson
are not there. I'm getting closer to figuring this out - might have to wait for next day - need sleep - . Kind regards, Chris Wilkinson, YBBN/BNE. --- On Tue, 2/6/09, Chris Wilkinson wrote: From: Chris Wilkinson Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd... To: "FlightGe

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs-construct help reqd...

2009-06-02 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Well, I managed to build something that could be seen in fg. Unfortunately its bereft of textures... http://blobster.50webs.com/ybbn-new.jpg Apologies to those who cannot view that image - I've had reports of people not being able to look at the previous image I put on that webserver

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs error

2006-11-15 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> This error shows up each time I shutdown fgfs. Is it a freeglut error > or fgfs. It make no difference as best I can tell it's a known bug of freeglut. slightly earlier or slightly later package of freeglut might help, but there is no harm in it is as it is; with further freeglut underneath

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs error

2006-11-14 Thread Thomas Biwer
>This error shows up each time I shutdown fgfs. Is it a freeglut error >or fgfs. It make no difference as best I can tell > >freeglut ERROR: Function called without first calling >'glutInit'. Same here. Anyway I cant see any effects on FlightGear on my machine too. So I m just ignoring it...

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs aborting

2006-11-04 Thread Sid Boyce
Curtis Olson wrote: > You need Mathias's patched OpenSceneGraph. I don't have the link handy, > but you should be able to dig back through the email archives and find > it pretty easily. > > Curt. > Thanks, I only spotted the post with the URL after I had posted and wondered if it would solve

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs aborting

2006-11-04 Thread Didier Fabert
Le samedi 4 novembre 2006 22:33, Curtis Olson a écrit : > You need Mathias's patched OpenSceneGraph. I don't have the link handy, > but you should be able to dig back through the email archives and find it > pretty easily. > > Curt. i have it on the hand ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs aborting

2006-11-04 Thread Curtis Olson
You need Mathias's patched OpenSceneGraph.  I don't have the link handy, but you should be able to dig back through the email archives and find it pretty easily.Curt.-- Curtis Olson - University of Minnesota - FlightGear Projecthttp://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/   http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/  ht

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-17 Thread Durk Talsma
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 10:20, Innis Cunningham wrote: > Hi Durk > > > Durk Talsma writes > > >On Tuesday 17 October 2006 03:13, Innis Cunningham wrote: > > > Good luck I emailed him a couple of years ago and got no reply. > > > As for static aircraft, with Durk Talsma's traffic system you can

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-17 Thread Dene
Hi all, Chris Wilkinson wrote: > Hi there, > > Innis Cunningham wrote: > >> "Andrew Gorman" writes >> >> >> >>> Can we convert some static MSFS aircraft over to static duty?? mike Stone >>> makes wonderul aircraft that weigh in at around 700kb each, are fully >>> functioning and look acc

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-17 Thread Innis Cunningham
Hi Durk Durk Talsma writes > >On Tuesday 17 October 2006 03:13, Innis Cunningham wrote: > > Good luck I emailed him a couple of years ago and got no reply. > > As for static aircraft, with Durk Talsma's traffic system you can use > > any model in the FG system as a flying model so I would think

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-17 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Innis Cunningham wrote: > > > "Andrew Gorman" writes > > >>Can we convert some static MSFS aircraft over to static duty?? mike Stone >>makes wonderul aircraft that weigh in at around 700kb each, are fully >>functioning and look accurate.these would be perfect for static work or

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-16 Thread Durk Talsma
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 03:13, Innis Cunningham wrote: > Good luck I emailed him a couple of years ago and got no reply. > As for static aircraft, with Durk Talsma's traffic system you can use > any model in the FG system as a flying model so I would think the > days of statics has passed > Isn

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-16 Thread Innis Cunningham
"Andrew Gorman" writes >Can we convert some static MSFS aircraft over to static duty?? mike Stone >makes wonderul aircraft that weigh in at around 700kb each, are fully >functioning and look accurate.these would be perfect for static work or >even AI..would have to email him though an

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-16 Thread Dene
Hi Chris Chris Wilkinson wrote: > Hi there, > > Chris Wilkinson wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> Dene wrote: >> >> >>> Hi all, >>> Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New >>> Zealand scenery. >>> >>> available from 203.97.103.206:5907 - "Downloads"-"Scenery" righ

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-16 Thread Andrew Gorman
Hi Chris, very nice! If the 777 ever did visit..:) Can we convert some static MSFS aircraft over to static duty?? mike Stone makes wonderul aircraft that weigh in at around 700kb each, are fully functioning and look accurate.these would be perfect for static work or even AI..w

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-16 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Chris Wilkinson wrote: > Hi there, > > Dene wrote: > >>Hi all, >>Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New >>Zealand scenery. >> >>available from 203.97.103.206:5907 - "Downloads"-"Scenery" right click >>and "save as"... >> >>mainly Christchurch (NZCH) an

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Andrew Gorman
Hi Dene, fantastic job on the skybridges at NZCH and NZWN! They make the airports look way more realistic :) Slainte, Andy > Hi Craig > Unfortunately my modeling skills don't extend to terminal buildings. I > simply plagiarize existing models and put new xml wrappers on them if >

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Dene
Craig Benbow wrote: > Dene wrote: > >> Hi Craig, >> Informally tested with 09.10. >> It's all tested and working under 098a so 09.10 shouldn't be a problem. >> >> The zip is extracted into the FGROOT dir ... all paths are relative to >> fgroot. It might create 2 models folders /fgfsdb and /nz

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Craig Benbow
Dene wrote: > Hi Craig, > Informally tested with 09.10. > It's all tested and working under 098a so 09.10 shouldn't be a problem. > > The zip is extracted into the FGROOT dir ... all paths are relative to > fgroot. It might create 2 models folders /fgfsdb and /nzworking if they > don't already ex

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Dene
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 10/14/2006 4:00:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New > Zealand scenery. > > available from 203.97.103.206:5907 - "Downloads"-"Scenery" right

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Hi there, Dene wrote: > Hi all, > Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New > Zealand scenery. > > available from 203.97.103.206:5907 - "Downloads"-"Scenery" right click > and "save as"... > > mainly Christchurch (NZCH) and Wellington(NZWN) updates ... AI scenario

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Andrew Gorman
Hi Craig, I think I was one of the guinnea pigs for this scenery and I am using 9.10. It all works fine with very little to hit in the frame rates. All credit to Dene and his amazing work. :) Slainte, Andy NZCH > Hey Dene, > Cool and thanks a bunch for doing that work. Question though,

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread RMcN
In a message dated 10/14/2006 4:00:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New Zealand scenery.available from 203.97.103.206:5907  - "Downloads"-"Scenery"  right click and "save as"... I would love to

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Dene
Craig Benbow wrote: > Dene wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New >> Zealand scenery. >> >> available from 203.97.103.206:5907 - "Downloads"-"Scenery" right click >> and "save as"... >> >> mainly Christchurch (NZCH) and Wellington(NZWN)

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS NZ-Users- New scenery

2006-10-14 Thread Craig Benbow
Dene wrote: > Hi all, > Well I finally got it done... an archive of my latest effort for New > Zealand scenery. > > available from 203.97.103.206:5907 - "Downloads"-"Scenery" right click > and "save as"... > > mainly Christchurch (NZCH) and Wellington(NZWN) updates ... AI scenario > for the In

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs --jsclient=extreme-3d-pro.xml

2006-09-06 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Donn Washburn wrote: > Hey Group; > > Where does Flightgear get its default joystick information? > It seems that my joystick is seen but defined wrong. I have tried > "fgfs --jsclient=extreme-3d-pro.xml" and it seems to be missed as the > config.file. Should I leave the .xm

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-08 Thread GWMobile
People are getting half life a 3d game to run on the ipod nano under linux (podzilla kernal. Maybe we need an ipod version of fg :-) Tunes while u fly. On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:01 pm, Tony Pelton wrote: > On 6/7/06, Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:42:54 -0400 >>

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Tony Pelton
On 6/7/06, Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:42:54 -0400 > Tony Pelton wrote: > > > > i also recall reading that some folks had had some success getting > > Linux OpenGL apps to run on it. > > With hardware rendering? Do you have a link? hmmm ... i _tought_ that i

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Chris Metzler
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:42:54 -0400 Tony Pelton wrote: > > i do know that the video "card" in the xbox is an NVidia chipset, with > modifications for the xbox. > > i also recall reading that some folks had had some success getting > Linux OpenGL apps to run on it. With hardware rendering? Do you

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Tony Pelton
On 6/7/06, Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:56:23 +0200 > Jorge Juan wrote: > > > > Linux can be installed in a X-box (the original one, not 360, AFAIK) and > > then you can install FG for Linux. Although you probably want to just > > produce a CD with FG that you c

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Jorge Juan
I just got to know that the ATI card included in the X-box is not supported (3D accel I mean), although it is similar to other ATI cards. I am afraid FG-X-Box will have to wait for some time. jorge. El mié, 07-06-2006 a las 14:34 -0400, Chris Metzler escribió: > On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:56:23 +0200

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Chris Metzler
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:56:23 +0200 Jorge Juan wrote: > > Linux can be installed in a X-box (the original one, not 360, AFAIK) and > then you can install FG for Linux. Although you probably want to just > produce a CD with FG that you can feed to the X-box like a regular > comercial game... > > I t

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Minot Opdyke
thanks for the info.. Minott Opdyke SCT Rose Elementary School 432-2495 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Linux can be installed in a X-box (the original one, not 360, AFAIK) and then you can install FG for Linux. Although you probably want to just produce a CD with FG that you can feed to the X-box like

Re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS and X-Box

2006-06-07 Thread Jorge Juan
Linux can be installed in a X-box (the original one, not 360, AFAIK) and then you can install FG for Linux. Although you probably want to just produce a CD with FG that you can feed to the X-box like a regular comercial game... I think there is a Debian variant adapted to the X-box, so probably yo

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs on FC5 with NVIDIA

2006-05-04 Thread andy
Turns out that fgfs and freeglut 2.4 do cause problems. There is a thread on the flightgear dev list about this issue. http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03577.html thx andy > Hi > > I am trying to install fgfs (0.9.10) on my FC5, 2.6.16-1.2096 kernel > with NV

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs on FC5 with NVIDIA

2006-05-04 Thread andy
Sid Boyce wrote: > Dave Culp wrote: >> On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:44 pm, andy wrote: >>> So my assumption of having to install freeglut 2.2 is correct ? >> >> Don't know about freeglut. I use glut. >> Check that your symlinks point to the nvidia version of libGL. >>> Are you referring to this

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs on FC5 with NVIDIA

2006-05-04 Thread Sid Boyce
Dave Culp wrote: On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:44 pm, andy wrote: So my assumption of having to install freeglut 2.2 is correct ? Don't know about freeglut. I use glut. Check that your symlinks point to the nvidia version of libGL. Are you referring to this symlink ? lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs on FC5 with NVIDIA

2006-05-04 Thread Dave Culp
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:44 pm, andy wrote: > So my assumption of having to install freeglut 2.2 is correct ? Don't know about freeglut. I use glut. > > Check that your symlinks point to the nvidia version of libGL. > > Are you referring to this symlink ? > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 May 2 1

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs on FC5 with NVIDIA

2006-05-04 Thread andy
Dave So my assumption of having to install freeglut 2.2 is correct ? > On Thursday 04 May 2006 01:35 pm, andy wrote: > >> error: Failed dependencies: >> libGL.so.1(LIBGL) is needed by freeglut-2.2.0-1.i386 >> ... >> /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-1.0-8756/libGL.so.1 >> > > Check that

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs on FC5 with NVIDIA

2006-05-04 Thread Dave Culp
On Thursday 04 May 2006 01:35 pm, andy wrote: > error: Failed dependencies: > libGL.so.1(LIBGL) is needed by freeglut-2.2.0-1.i386 > ... > /usr/lib64/nvidia-graphics-1.0-8756/libGL.so.1 Check that your symlinks point to the nvidia version of libGL. Dave

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs doesn't work after upgrade to 0.9.9

2006-01-05 Thread cmetzler
any suggestions? is this a common problem with my graphic adapter, or should i try it first with a hand compiled fgfs? >>> >>> >>> This does seem to be a common problem for ATI users - could you try building >>> simgear and flightgear from CVS and see if that cures your problem? Some >>>

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs doesn't work after upgrade to 0.9.9

2006-01-05 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> >>any suggestions? is this a common problem with my graphic adapter, or > >>should i try it first with a hand compiled fgfs? > > > > > > This does seem to be a common problem for ATI users - could you try building > > simgear and flightgear from CVS and see if that cures your problem? Some > > c

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs doesn't work after upgrade to 0.9.9

2006-01-05 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Thursday 05 January 2006 13:11, Jimmy Ott wrote: > i just grabbed actual cvs version, and it works great :) Excellent! Thanks for letting us know - others have had mixed results I think and it might well be helpful to know which cards work and which ones still cause trouble. AJ --

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs doesn't work after upgrade to 0.9.9

2006-01-05 Thread Jimmy Ott
AJ MacLeod wrote: > On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:50, Jimmy Ott wrote: > >>any suggestions? is this a common problem with my graphic adapter, or >>should i try it first with a hand compiled fgfs? > > > This does seem to be a common problem for ATI users - could you try building > simgear and f

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs doesn't work after upgrade to 0.9.9

2006-01-05 Thread AJ MacLeod
On Thursday 05 January 2006 10:50, Jimmy Ott wrote: > any suggestions? is this a common problem with my graphic adapter, or > should i try it first with a hand compiled fgfs? This does seem to be a common problem for ATI users - could you try building simgear and flightgear from CVS and see if th

re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs navaids realism

2001-09-27 Thread David Megginson
Frederick B. Henry, Jr. writes: > I'm sorry if this is an FAQ or otherwise a naive question, but to what > extent is the FlightGear data (say from the most current cvs) in sync with > what one can find on a sectional or terminal area chart? It's pretty close in the areas where I fly (mostly N

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs navaids realism

2001-09-26 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Frederick B. Henry, Jr. writes: > I'm sorry if this is an FAQ or otherwise a naive question, but to what > extent is the FlightGear data (say from the most current cvs) in sync with > what one can find on a sectional or terminal area chart? Realizing that > they are relatively frequently amended,

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs compilation error

2001-09-26 Thread Jacek Marczewski
D Luff wrote: >It should compile and run with those two lines commented out. > It really does! Thanks Jacek. ___ Flightgear-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs compilation error

2001-09-26 Thread D Luff
> Jacek Marczewski wrote: > > I returned to plib-1.4.2 and there is no more errors with auto_gui.cxx. > Now there are others: > main.cxx:115: syntax error before `=' > main.cxx:116: syntax error before `=' > > So the question returns. > It should compile and run with those two lines commented

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs compilation error

2001-09-26 Thread Jacek Marczewski
Jacek Marczewski wrote: > Hi, > I have tried newest versions from cvs. Plib was O.K., SimGear also. > FGFS gives: > auto_gui.cxx: In function `void NewHeadingInit ()': > auto_gui.cxx:223: `puGetStringWidth' undeclared (first use this > function) > auto_gui.cxx:223: (Each undeclared identifier is

Re: [Flightgear-users] fgfs compilation error

2001-09-25 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jacek Marczewski writes: > Hi, > I have tried newest versions from cvs. Plib was O.K., SimGear also. > FGFS gives: > auto_gui.cxx: In function `void NewHeadingInit ()': > auto_gui.cxx:223: `puGetStringWidth' undeclared (first use this > function) > auto_gui.cxx:223: (Each undeclared identifier is

re: [Flightgear-users] FGFS Joystick Reverse Elevator Axis Question

2001-08-28 Thread David Megginson
Will Parker writes: > Has anybody found that their elevator axis when under default joystick > configuration acts in the reverse scale than what is normal? ie pull > back on the stick for nose down and visa versa. The default configuration reverses the axis because that's how most consumer jo

  1   2   >