Brian O'Shea wrote:
Hello FreeBSD developers,
Building a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE kernel on an Intel Pentium 4 with the
following config options causes buildkernel to fail with undefined
references to stack_save, stack_zero, and stack_print functions:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
options INVARIANTS
Mario Lobo wrote:
Hello;
here is a snip of dmesg:
-
Starting sshd.
Starting cron.
Local package initialization:
Starting Init
Starting Samba
Removing stale Samba tdb files:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
done
Starting Init
Starting Samba
Removing
Brian O'Shea wrote:
Thank you for your reply, Kris.
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian O'Shea wrote:
Hello FreeBSD developers,
Building a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE kernel on an Intel Pentium 4 with the
following config options causes buildkernel to fail with undefined
references
? Ashish Shukla wrote:
Hi
I'm running FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 (AMD64) on Intel Pentium 4 630
(EM64T/HT) on Intel D945GNTL motheboard. I'd this crash when I was
running in GNOME, playing with Avahi and nss_mdns to get mDNS over
IPv6 working.
88
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/crashes]$ kgdb
Jim Pazarena wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why
create a
newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last of versions meant
Chris wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course not :P What are the PR references?
Try this.
Login to twice on ssh.
If not root su both to root.
using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
on the first tty type 'killall watch'
you have now crashed freebsd
Brian wrote:
There's a thread on the -stable list about 8 cores being an issue in a
very specific case. I couldn't imagine setting j to something more than
2x or 3x at the most of your available cores.
So it's okay by you that freebsd utilities crash when you overload them?
Not to me ;-)
Steve Franks wrote:
I'm running ataidle on my personal server to save electricity.
However, every time it has to spin up a drive whatever I'm accessing
(apache, cvs, etc) gives an error instead of waiting for the disk. If
I then access it again after a couple seconds once the disk is active
it
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tore Lund wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Dave wrote:
Hello,
How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their
any
outstanding issues?
Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0
Frank Shute wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:25:52AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Before I file a PR I just want to know if it is worth it to file a PR for:
make -j1000 buildworld buildkernel installkernel
seg faulting
No. Where in the handbook or UPDATING does it tell you to build your
Andy Greenwood wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Before I file a PR I just want to know if it is worth it to file a PR
for:
make -j1000 buildworld buildkernel installkernel
seg faulting
I thought that the kernel builds couldn't be built using parallel jobs,
that it might break something. Is
Doug Poland wrote:
On Mon, November 26, 2007 15:03, Doug Poland wrote:
On Mon, November 26, 2007 14:26, Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
This morning my 7.0-BETA3 i386 system (Compaq nx7400) reset shortly
after starting X11. I didn't think much of it and went to get a cup
of coffee while the
Frank Shute wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:02:44PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Andy Greenwood wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Before I file a PR I just want to know if it is worth it to file a PR
for:
make -j1000 buildworld buildkernel installkernel
seg faulting
I thought that the kernel
Mark Evans wrote:
I'm using FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. When I run ls -l it takes forever for the it to complete. top
shows that the ls -l command uses about 98% of the CPU doing the time. If I run ls
I do not experience any problem. anyone have any ideas?
Are you using NIS for user/group
Tore Lund wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Dave wrote:
Hello,
How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
outstanding issues?
Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
well start using it now.
It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning
Chris wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tore Lund wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Dave wrote:
Hello,
How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
outstanding issues?
Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
well
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On one of my FBSD 6-STABLE machines, I have the system cvsup the latest
sources nightly and rebuild (but not install) the system and all
relevant kernels. Every week or so, I go to single user and
install what was last built (assuming the build worked OK).
My last such
RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:21:17 -0500 (EST)
Michael S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day all,
I am running 6.2 with patches, however my package_site
points to 6-stable. Upgrading binary packages gives
this message: Undefined symbol __sbmaskrune.
From the few results Google returned, I
kasthurirangan balaji wrote:
Hi,
I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that
FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go
through the sun website to understand the advantages
of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD have a
BTree/B+Tree(replicating c++ multimaps, but file
based) by default
Yuri wrote:
When 6.0 was in BETA kernel had many options like WITNESS/INVARIANTS. User-land
also has some special options. Those options made FreeBSD-BETA much slower.
Are any similar options on now in 7.0-BETA2? What is the complete list?
I can only find an option makeoptions DEBUG=-g in
Jonathan Horne wrote:
i updated my workstatino to beta3, and then got on a 6.2-p8 machine and
mounted /usr/src and /usr/obj from the beta3. tried to installkernel, but
it moved as painful pace. would get to the point where it moves kernel to
kernel.old, and would just pause for a long time.
Mark Staudinger wrote:
On 11/14/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Staudinger wrote:
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I
searched
both before posting.
I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of
Intel
and AMD-based
Jonathan Horne wrote:
I was reading a while back that the jails tcp system was getting an overhaul,
possibly in the 7.0 release. I don't remember all the particulars, but things
along the lines to make jails function even more like a real (independant)
system. I believe one of the
Friedrich, Steven wrote:
I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 Beta-2 from the bootonly iso and from CD1
iso. The bootonly iso installs over the net and failed to fetch the
INDEX when trying to install ports, i.e., xorg, etc.
CD1 did the same thing.
Is this a known problem?
Yes, packages are only
Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote:
my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its
items it updated:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep cups-
cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System
but my 7.0-b2
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you
verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images?
This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure:
http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf
Similar
Mark Staudinger wrote:
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched
both before posting.
I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel
and AMD-based machines that I work with.
I'm using the i386 release. I've previously used
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey All,
I recently CVSUPPED to what I thought would be 6.2-STABLE but instead
got 6.3-PRERELEASE.
However, I look at www.freebsd.org/releng and I see no reference to the
release cycle of 6.3.
Was this a mistake of some sort?
Only in your expectations :)
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Tino Engel wrote:
No, I wanted to track the 6-release chain, but was just a little
surprised...I thought this kind of CVS naming scheme didn't take place
till much later in the release engineering process.
Relax...it's just a name :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. We are developers. If you want , we can help to you for Turkish language
support.You can rely on us. We worked some projects.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 16:59 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. We are developers. If you want , we can help to you for Turkish language
support.You can rely on us. We worked some projects.
That's not true, you cannot help us.
That is quite a rude thing to say, and
Kelly Martin wrote:
I'm getting daily kernel panics. The server was running fine for about
a month, the only changes I've made recently have been to update all
my ports. It's running on older i386 hardware, no special devices
attached. Here's the console message I'm getting (copied by hand):
Kelly Martin wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 10:41 AM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks pretty suspicious to me, I'd guess your hardware has failed.
This same hardware has run OpenBSD for years.
Not really relevant. When something makes the transition from working
to broken
Jeff Mohler wrote:
Whats the max file size you can create under 6.1?
Please see the FAQ.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Mario Lobo wrote:
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create
a newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:27:58PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
a. Make backups
b. Read /usr/src/UPDATING
1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree).
2. `make buildworld'
3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
Ivan Georgiev wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:27:58 +
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop.
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:32:22PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You don't need to delete all the ports in one go and then reinstall
them in another: running 'portupgrade -fa' will do the job.
Port upgrade tools are not guaranteed to work perfectly in this
situation. I tried
Noah wrote:
HI there,
I am not quite sure what library I need to cure this issue up.
$ nmap -sP -v 192.168.1.1-255
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libm.so.6 not found, required by
libstdc++.so.5
That doesn't make much sense because no version of FreeBSD yet has a
libm.so.6. How did
Noah wrote:
thanks Kris,
something must be wrong then. I am running into problems rebuilding
apache now and see undefined references from
/usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.5 during the build:
It looks like you have added a Linux libstdc++ library which is why it
is failing to resolve other Linux
Noah wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Noah wrote:
thanks Kris,
something must be wrong then. I am running into problems rebuilding
apache now and see undefined references from
/usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.5 during the build:
It looks like you have added a Linux libstdc++ library which is why
Noah wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Noah wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Noah wrote:
thanks Kris,
something must be wrong then. I am running into problems rebuilding
apache now and see undefined references from
/usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.5 during the build:
It looks like you have added
Gunther Mayer wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Gunther Mayer wrote:
I don't see why my javavm, apache, postgres and/or radiusd would
spawn such short lived processes. Come to think of it, I know radius
might be doing just that, but how the heck would I go about finding
out? top -H brings me
Mario Lobo wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 10:38:36 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Oh, you were going by the load average? That is not a measure of system
performance, it only shows how many processes are running.
Anyway, glad you resolved it to your satisfaction.
Kris
What would be the proper way
Gunther Mayer wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having some capacity issues on the FreeBSD 6.2/Core 2 Duo/2GB RAM
server that I manage. For quite a few days now it constantly shows load
averages of around 1 and a CPU usage of around 100%. Yet summing up the
CPU usage of the individual processes running I
Jay Chandler wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade path from 6.2 release
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be considered the
standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a compelling reason to
upgrade to one over the other?
Vince wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a
compelling reason
Doug Poland wrote:
I'd like to report the details but I'm unfamiliar with the process.
Should I post here on -questions or on -current mailing list?
-stable.
Looks like the issue is: kernel: current process = 46 (ath0 taskq)
Well, unfortunately that doesn't really say anything. Read the
Steve Franks wrote:
Seems every time I try to install a pkg or make a port lately, I get this:
===Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries in /usr/ports/x1
1/xorg-libraries
/usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot proceed.
This looks like an
Doug Poland wrote:
Hello,
I've just updated my system to 7.0-PRERELEASE from 6.2-STABLE on i386
and I was wondering what the recommendation is for ports. Specifically,
is it necessary to rebuild all ports?
So far, I haven't rebuilt any ports and haven't had any problems...
Yes, it is
Chad Perrin wrote:
I get this:
# portversion -v | grep -v =
bison-1.75_2,1succeeds port (port has 2.3_3)
Any idea why? Judging by the numbers, I'd think that should be
instead. Nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING seems to apply here.
Looks like PORTEPOCH was incorrectly
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello,
For some reason, I want to understand how the queueing of blocked
threads in the kernel works when waiting for a lock, which is if I
understand correctly done by the turnstiles and sleepqueues. I'm the
proud owner of The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and -announce.
Because it's an administrative change that is just a normal part of the
release engineering process. i.e. 7.0 is not
Mel wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of
RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and
-announce.
Because it's an administrative change that is just
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Even though I know this is asking for it I want to test the new nVidia
driver on amd64 and the only issue with a hand compile (from nVidia's
tar not the ports one) is src/nv-kernel.o is branded elf-i386-32 and
amd64 wants it branded elf-amd64-64. This file comes from them
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On 10/11/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Even though I know this is asking for it I want to test the new nVidia
driver on amd64 and the only issue with a hand compile (from nVidia's
tar not the ports one) is src/nv-kernel.o is branded elf
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Elvar wrote:
Hi there,
snip
http://www.freebsdforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38765page=1pp=1
http://www.freebsdforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38765page=1pp=1
which seemed to describe the same freezing I was having. One person
mentioned setting
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Elvar wrote:
Hi there,
snip
snip
Could someone familiar with -CURRENT perhaps explain why this option
(debug.mpsafenet=0) is gone?
Because it was an obsolete option that was complicating the code and
holding back
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Elvar wrote:
Hi there,
snip
snip
Could someone familiar with -CURRENT perhaps explain why this
option (debug.mpsafenet=0) is gone?
Because it was an obsolete option
Richard Puga wrote:
I have been installing FreeBSD 6.2 on IBM XSeries servers some of which
I need to run external USB drives.
While backing up to a USB hard drive at random times the computer locks
up or reboots with some, but not all of the systems.
The XP3100's work fine and dmesg shows a
RW wrote:
The FreeBSD response was to make the kernel more SMP friendly with
finer-grained locking, and to bring-in the ULE scheduler. Dragonfly BSD
was a fork off 4.x by people who thought a more radical kernel rewrite
was needed. Their kernel avoids a lot of the locking problems by using
Oliver Herold wrote:
Are there any numbers or technical papers? Just out of curiosity.
I ran a mysql benchmark against Dragonfly-current and FreeBSD 7 on an
8-core machine (one of the workloads that FreeBSD now performs very well
at) and found 0 scaling on dragonfly. Their developers
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 9/29/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Herold wrote:
Are there any numbers or technical papers? Just out of curiosity.
I ran a mysql benchmark against Dragonfly-current and FreeBSD 7 on an
8-core machine (one of the workloads that FreeBSD
Oliver Herold wrote:
OpenBSD isn't about performance, so it will be most of the time inferior.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2007/09/28/0014.html
Maybe this is of some help. But if compare it to Jeffs FreeBSD/Linux benches it
looks rather strange to me.
Yeah, that's the one I am
James Jeffery wrote:
Does 7.0 come with a disk for the Ports Collection or would they have
to be downloaded from the internet?
When it is released you will be able to buy a CD set containing some of
the packages, but if you are downloading then you will have to use the
usual methods for
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Are you attempting to download ports on 6.2 before you move to 7 or on
7? If the and your on a SMP (dual core don't know about physically
seperate) there are some known issues in the protocol stack
Er, what issues, pray tell? :)
Kris
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On 9/29/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Are you attempting to download ports on 6.2 before you move to 7 or on
7? If the and your on a SMP (dual core don't know about physically
seperate) there are some known issues in the protocol stack
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi All, I noticed that 'Debian user community' was listed here.
Maybe we should start funneling all the mysql related stuff to a single
FreeBSD managed user?
ale@ maintains the ports, so he's the obvious one.
Kris
___
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hello,
I used potsclean, and it broke my GCC enviroment.
What is potsclean?
I can't make buildworld anymore.
stage 2.3: build tools
--
cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj INSTALL=sh
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 9/24/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hello,
I used potsclean, and it broke my GCC enviroment.
What is potsclean?
I can't make buildworld anymore.
stage 2.3: build tools
Gabriel Dragffy wrote:
Hi, trying to find out where the complete packge files are for the
packges that I compiled from ports. I wanted to save these somewhere so
I wouldn't have to recompile them in the future. The handbook doesn't
shed any light on this:(
They are not saved separately but
Wil Hatfield wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 5:20 PM
To: Wil Hatfield
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Panics in 6.1 and 6.2 always Exim 4
Wil Hatfield wrote:
Well after a year we still
Ivan Voras wrote:
NetOpsCenter wrote:
I have been using FreeBSD 7.0 since Jan 8 2007 CURRENT on this box
which is a desktop for browsing and email with a Dual core AMD CPU
setup.
It rocks.
I use FreeBSD 7.0 Current on 2 small mailservers using 3 year old
hardware and it is rock solid.
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 21/09/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use 7.0 on about 70 machines that are extremely heavily loaded, all
running ULE, ranging from single through to 8 CPUs, some using ZFS, etc.
I don't see these problems you are claiming, so you'll have to do some
more
Wil Hatfield wrote:
Well after a year we still haven't tracked down the kernel panic problems
that are occuring on both our 6.1 and 6.2 machines for those we have had
time to upgrade. It occurs on 6.1-RC, 6.1-RELEASE 6.1-STABLE, 6.2, you name
it.
We are noticing that all of the dumps are
P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Charles Bacon wrote:
I installed FreeBSD-RELEASE6.2 last January, and wonder if there will be
a 6.3. Just discovered freebsd-update(8), tried it out, and saw:
WARNING: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE is approaching its End-of-Life date.
It is strongly
NetOpsCenter wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Charles Bacon wrote:
I installed FreeBSD-RELEASE6.2 last January, and wonder if there
will be
a 6.3. Just discovered freebsd-update(8), tried it out, and saw:
WARNING: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE is approaching
Deceased wrote:
Hi,
I have a serious problem, that I cannot solve my self :(
I have freebsd 6.2 router that has 3 NICs (lan, wan, dmz), suddenly
(about two weeks ago) it started to hang without leaving anything in
logs. I thought that it was hardware problem. So at first I changed
Josh Carroll wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. It's always good to hear it works fine
anti-bug-reports :)
Kris
This is getting a bit off topic, so pardon me. :) I picked a bad time
to try to move to 7-CURRENT, just after the gcc 4.2.1 integration.
Many ports would not compile properly, etc. I
Matthijs Breemans wrote:
Kris,
Is that url correct? Website doesn't show up here. And a traceroute dies
somewhere @ yahoo (From the Netherlands)
Regards,
Matthijs
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Kris Kennaway
Verzonden: woensdag 19
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
my.cnf
innodb_thread_concurrency = 8
You want '0' or performance will suck. There's a basic architectural
flaw in how mysql handles non-zero concurrency values here (innodb
accesses are serialized by a global mutex that protects a counter to
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Is it worth having the port remove that recommendation from the
/usr/local/share/mysql/*.cnf files ?
It probably is worth it, yeah.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Brent Jones wrote:
Good morning -
After a 6.2 to 7-Current FreeBSD upgrade, do you need to rebuild your
ports?
Yes (as with any major release upgrade). Old binaries will continue to
work, but if you ever plan to compile a new port you will have to
rebuild your existing ports first, because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats weird. When I updated using cvsup it updated all of the ports in my
/usr/ports directory. I then ran make install on /usr/ports/x11/xorg, it then
looks for dri-7.0.1,2.tbz, but that file isn't in
amd64/packages-6.2-release/latest or
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Josh Carroll wrote:
That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded
performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland
though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread.
Oh I wasn't sure if libthr
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use
ULE for performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I
don't know whether the release engineers plan to change that default,
but I will check.
could you point to some
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On 9/14/07, Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Maxim Khitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm about to purchase a new system for myself. It will dual-boot
Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
for everything else. I
Josh Carroll wrote:
In general, if you are running a multi-process or multi-threaded
workload, FreeBSD 7 will be able to make good use of 8 CPU cores.
Over the past 2 years we have done extensive benchmarking and
optimizations that have resulted in *huge* performance improvements on
many common
Josh Carroll wrote:
Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use ULE
for performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I don't
know whether the release engineers plan to change that default, but I
will check.
Great, thanks for the info. Good to know, I'll be
Josh Carroll wrote:
That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded
performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland
though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread.
Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library for 6.2
also (I'd
RW wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:23:52 +0200
cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, it's portmanager that patches bsd.port.mk on the fly
(and backs the change out when it is done). Or it did so a
while ago; I don't know if it still does today.
Try to update portmanager, or use something else
Gabriel Dragffy wrote:
Hi all
I hope you can help me.
I have a clean install of freebsd. I changed to /usr and made ports
directory. Then I ran portsnap fetch and then extract. Then I changed to
ports-mngmt/portmanager and did make install clean.
When I try to install any port using
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 7, 2007, at 3:14 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:07 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:07 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Kennaway
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 1:57 AM
To: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Cc: User Questions
Subject
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
Hi
I have a 6.2R system (amd64) with the latest patch level.
The motherboard is a Tyan S5197 i3110 based board with a Core 2 Quad 2.4
ghz processor. There is 4GB of memory and an Areca ARC-1231ML raid card.
The problem is that I have to boot without ACPI
Danielisz Laszlo wrote:
Does anyone know how to usw gmail fs in FreeBSD?
If there is a FUSE module that does it, you might get it to work. It's
always going to be a big hack though.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Gary Affonso wrote:
If I do, it seems to me that the absolute first thing I should do after
installing a release version would be to change where pkg_add -r is
sourcing packages from. Either to current if I like to live on the
edge or stable if I want to be a more conservative.
No, stable
Maikel Lambregts wrote:
Hi,
I want to make automatic backup of my MySQL by using FreeBSD snapshots. All
works fine when I run the commands from my Putty, but when I run them from a
shell script the 2th command (mdconfig) gives an error.
These are the comments to make the backup, that work
Gueven Bay wrote:
I'm curious, why does pkg_add -r point to the release snapshot of
ports by default? Is the idea that a release is well-tested and that
any deviation from that (even security or bug-fix changes) is an unknown
that new users need to be shielded against when grabbing packages
301 - 400 of 3577 matches
Mail list logo
