jan gestre wrote:
On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
> hi guys,
>
>
> i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
> portupgrade, both
> methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i
> fix it
> :( is there a problem wit
On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
> hi guys,
>
>
> i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
> portupgrade, both
> methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i
> fix it
> :( is there a problem with the amavisd-new p
jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i
fix it
:( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port?
TIA
Hi,
could you concretize a bit, please? What kind of e
> | Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
> | with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
> | It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
> | antivirus + postgrey
> | and some small auxiliary services.
> Your server is good enough to
Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has the problems that plagued
> ATA? Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
>
> Personally, I still demand SCSI on production servers because it still
> seems as if:
> a) The performance is still better
> b) The reliability is s
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:56:24AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
> >looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current config is
running on a 6 year old Dell PowerEdge machine with SCSI RAID 5,
On 9/14/2006 10:32 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmai
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS,
but SAS costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
Get a 12 or 16 or 24 port Areca card and have a few hot spares and
you will see SATA fly for less money than SC
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS, but SAS
costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
-Derek
At 10:46 AM 9/14/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >
> > [..
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
I have yet to have a SATA drive last
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > > Frank Bonnet wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >> I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around
> 10K$
> > >
> > > Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason
> that SA
In response to Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
> >
> > Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
> > SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
>
>
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
___
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small a
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
>
> I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
--
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On 9/4/06, Phares Kariuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I installed Samba 2 on a FreeBSD box running 5.4 Stable...
now the problem is this... I urgently need to upgrade this package
but cannot seem to find a way to do so... I didnt install it off the port...
In istalled it using pkg_add... i
Dave wrote:
>I've got mysql server and client v4.1 running on a FreeBSD6.x box.
> They were installed via ports not packages using custom make options
> which i have in portupgrade's pkgtools.conf file. I now would like to
> upgrade both of them to v5, without causing dependency issues with
>
Ralph Ellis writes:
> Usually you have to upgrade from major release to major release
> i.e. 4.8 to 5.5, 5.5 to 6.1 etc. However, if you are only
> protecting data files then copy them to a cd, dvd or separate
> disk drive and do a clean install of 6.1. If you want to protect
> configuration
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 1:02 pm, Amita Bargal (ambargal) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a machine which has BSD 4.8 on it. Is it possible to upgrade to
> version 6.0 without affecting/deleting/losing any files currently
> present on the machine.
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD tcp-01-pc7 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 14:29, David Southwell wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 compiled Thursday Nov 3 2005
>> originally on an Abit VA-20 motherboard equipped with an AMD sempron cpu in
>> its 462 socket.
>>
>>The Abit motherboard died due to a chip failure and
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 14:29, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 compiled Thursday Nov 3 2005
> originally on an Abit VA-20 motherboard equipped with an AMD sempron cpu in
> its 462 socket.
>
> The Abit motherboard died due to a chip failure and I did
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Southwell
> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:29 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Upgrading a system to amd64
>
>
> Hi
>
> I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 comp
>
> I've already installed it, I should have mentioned
> that--sorry. What I mean is
> there a way to where when I type 'gcc' or 'g++' it uses gcc41
> or g++41? I
> know I could use symlinks but that would entail removing the
> gcc 3.4.2
> binaries which I'm afraid might be insecure.
i don
I've already installed it, I should have mentioned that--sorry. What I mean is
there a way to where when I type 'gcc' or 'g++' it uses gcc41 or g++41? I
know I could use symlinks but that would entail removing the gcc 3.4.2
binaries which I'm afraid might be insecure.
___
--- Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/10/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > In the last episode (Jul 10), Jacob Jennings said:
> > > Hello, I am on FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE and was
> wondering if there is a way
> > > to replace the system's GCC, shipped with 5.5,
> (GCC 3.4.2)
On 7/10/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 10), Jacob Jennings said:
> Hello, I am on FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE and was wondering if there is a way
> to replace the system's GCC, shipped with 5.5, (GCC 3.4.2) to GCC 4.1
> without upgrading the whole source tree to another
In the last episode (Jul 10), Jacob Jennings said:
> Hello, I am on FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE and was wondering if there is a way
> to replace the system's GCC, shipped with 5.5, (GCC 3.4.2) to GCC 4.1
> without upgrading the whole source tree to another release? Is there
> a way to do this that will not
Chris Hill wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Ron wrote:
Is there a way to use the current ports system if I am still running 5.3?
That's the only way.
I really need to update subversion, mysql, plus make sure I'm running
the latest versions of other software, but since 5.4 came out (and now
5.5
RW wrote:
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 11:12, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
[portversion -L =] would be quicker. Any > needs upgrading. Any < would mean
you somehow
had an installed version newer that the port version!
Presumably that could happen if the port were reverted.
For completeness,
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 11:12, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> would be quicker. Any > needs upgrading. Any < would mean you somehow
> had an installed version newer that the port version!
Presumably that could happen if the port were reverted.
___
freebsd-q
Chris Hill wrote:
What I usually do is
# cvsup -g /etc/cvsupfile.ports <- my ports supfile with "tag=."
# pkgdb -aF <- may throw a lot of errors, esp.
<- if you have an old ports tree.
<- Fix manually if
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Ron wrote:
Is there a way to use the current ports system if I am still running
5.3?
That's the only way.
I really need to update subversion, mysql, plus make sure I'm running
the latest versions of other software, but since 5.4 came out (and now
5.5 and 6.0), I am no l
Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to use the current ports system if I am still running 5.3?
>
> I really need to update subversion, mysql, plus make sure I'm running the
> latest versions of other software, but since 5.4 came out (and now 5.5 and
> 6.0), I am no longer been able
On 10/06/06 Gerard Seibert said:
> > I'm not aware of any port doing this. If you use portupgrade, use the
> > AFTERINSTALL configuration options to call the rc.d scripts and restart.
>
> You can configure 'portmanager' to stop and restart a program also. I
> was having the same problem with MySQ
On 6/8/06, Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, my nightly security report says that I should upgrade mysql-server.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pkg_info | grep mysql-server
mysql-server-4.1.15 Multithreaded SQL database (server)
But, what port does this correspond to?
Simply cd into /
Riemer Palstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:08:03PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> > And it shuts down my mysql server, but does not start it again. That's
> > not very nice. Should the upgrade not handle this?
>
> I'm not aware of any port doing this. If you use portupgrade, use the
>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:08:03PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> And it shuts down my mysql server, but does not start it again. That's
> not very nice. Should the upgrade not handle this?
I'm not aware of any port doing this. If you use portupgrade, use the
AFTERINSTALL configuration options
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:01:00PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> If the port is mysql41-server, maybe the package name should be similar?
Ah, because the package is named mysql-server-4.1.20.tbz you mean? Hm,
for people using packages, this would maybe make life easier, but to be
honest, I do
On 09/06/06 Michael P. Soulier said:
> Ok. Upgrading now.
And it shuts down my mysql server, but does not start it again. That's not
very nice. Should the upgrade not handle this?
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... I
On 09/06/06 Riemer Palstra said:
> > I'm assuming mysql41-server, since it's version 4.1.15.
>
> Your assumption is right.
Ok. Upgrading now.
If the port is mysql41-server, maybe the package name should be similar?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent foo
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:40:01PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -d /usr/ports/databases/mysql*server
> /usr/ports/databases/mysql323-server/ /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server/
> /usr/ports/databases/mysql40-server//usr/ports/databases/mysql51-server/
> /usr/po
* On 21/05/06 20:23 +0800, Jiongyi Jiang (citiz) wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| I got 5.4 installed before and now wants to have 6.1.
| Is there any way to upgrade from 6.1 to 5.4 rather than install a
| fresh version of 6.1? Thanks in advance.
hi Jiang,
I am FreeBSD "damu" (by blood), and so I'll te
Jiongyi Jiang (citiz) wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I got 5.4 installed before and now wants to have 6.1. Is there any way
> to upgrade from 6.1 to 5.4 rather than install a fresh version of 6.1?
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
The handbook covers how to update your system.
The link below outlines on
> Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:34:18 -0400
> From: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Upgrading and Disk Space.
> To:
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am about to upgrade a 6.0 m
I have a /usr/src/sys/compile dirs that has 400 meg in it. ( a kernel config
dir) can I delete it?
-Grant
- Original Message -
From: "Laurence Sanford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 9:58 AM
Grant Peel wrote:
The idea is to try NOT to fill up the filesystem and crap out duing
the upgrade.
664M./src
303M./ports
Remove those two if you're doing an upgrade using the discs. If you're
building the upgrade from source, you obviously can't do that. If adding
a drive is an o
Jonathan Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> quick question, is the appropriate method of upgrading as follows:
>
> - make 3 floppies (boot, kern1, kern2) from the "new" version's tree
> - reboot from the floppies
> - follow the sysinstall's upgrade path?
I usually do source upgrades, but that s
The most obvious thing is to remove the ports, then add them later after
the upgrade.
-Derek
At 07:34 AM 5/20/2006, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to upgrade a 6.0 machine to 6.1R.
I am running a little tight on space on the3 /usr part. I was wondering
what can be safely remo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the input, Eric and Kevin! I guess I'll start the process
this evening and
maybe everything will be through compiling by Monday in time for work! :)
Thanks again!
I've got the process in 2 scripts, and a brief evening is generally
all that's required f
I have done both the binary upgrade and cvsup'd many times. Which is
better depends on your time and what version you are moving from and
to. If you do a binary upgrade, you will only be at the release of the
version, say 6.1, but with any current security releases. I typically
upgrade a sy
Add the audit group to /etc/group if you have not. you would add:
audit:*:77:
As for /etc/master.passwd, you can usually ignore this. The mergemaster
shows the differences which will be the CVS id in the first line, and any
differences from adding or removing users.
-Derek
At 11:3
2006 2:10 PM
To: Zimmerman, Eric
Subject: RE: Upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1
Quoting "Zimmerman, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Try this
>
> https://mikestammer.com/doku.php?id=updateos
>
> its what I wrote up for myself when I update
>
> worked for me from 6 to 6.1 an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has possibly been discussed a number of times, and if it has, I
apologize. Here is my situation:
Apology accepted ;-) :-D
I would like to upgrade my existing 6.0-SECURITY system to 6.1-RELEASE
and continue using freebsd-update to keep my system on the up an
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I have had complete success with upgrading 6.0 to 6.1rc1 and finally, 6.1
RELEASE.
Sorry about asking a question that I am sure has been asked once befor
Can I upgrade a 4.4, 4.7, 4.10, 5.2.1 boxes the same way using CVSup i.e
directly from one of those to 6.1
> Can I upgrade a 4.4, 4.7, 4.10, 5.2.1 boxes the same way using CVSup
i.e
> directly from one of those to 6.1R?
>
> TIA,
>
> -Grant
>
> P.S. I keep complete backups ...
>
Pretty sure you need to get to at least 5.3 before jumping to 6.x
___
freebs
John Nielsen wrote:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:48, Miguel wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 5/9/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location).
Here is
mine:
*default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*d
John Cruz writes:
> >What particularly of cvsup do you find confusing?
>
> Specifically it would be the supfile stuff, everything I've been
> reading says "if you put in the wrong thing here, you can screw
> the whole system up",
A bad supfile will mess up _the source tree_; o
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:48, Miguel wrote:
> Nikolas Britton wrote:
> > On 5/9/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location).
> >> Here is
> >> mine:
> >>
> >> *default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org
> >> *default base=/var/db
> >> *de
> is that info (tags meaning) available somewhere in the handbook?, im
> running 6.1-RC1 and want to upgrade to 6.1-RELEASE, or better to
> 6.1-STABLE, what tag should i use?
> RELENG???
> ---
RELENG_6_1 I believe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailin
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 5/9/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped]
2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location).
Here is
mine:
*default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
*default del
On 5/9/06, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped]
2) Create a supfile appropriate for your situation (and location). Here is
mine:
*default host=cvsup12.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default
On 5/9/06, John Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all
the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download
the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better
way? if so how do I go about it? the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Cruz
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:06 PM
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Upgrading to 6.1 (cvsup)
>
> So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before
John Nielsen wrote:
cvsup is definitely the preferred way to upgrade, and is very easy to use,
especially once you get it set up the first time.
You need to:
1) Make sure you have cvsup installed
pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui
OR
cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui && make instal
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 13:06, John Cruz wrote:
> So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all
> the documentation is confusing as can be. Would it be easier to download
> the install mediums and do an upgrade install or is cvsup the better
> way? if so how do I go about it?
Robert Huff wrote:
John Cruz writes:
So I want to upgrade to 6.1, but I've never used cvsup before and all
the documentation is confusing as can be.
What particularly of cvsup do you find confusing?
On the larger question: it /may/ be easier to do a binary
upgrade.
Which one of the handbook pages are you looking at?
Well, anyway. This is what I did (Mind you, my way might have been the
wrong way. This is my first time upgrading a FreeBSD installation,
too).
# cp /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile /root/
- Edit the /root/stable-supfile file to use a mi
Figured this one out. For benefit of others I did the following:
pkg_delete on autoconf259, then deinstall and reinstall on it and then
tried subversion build again and it went fine.
David Pratt wrote:
Hi. I am attempting to bring my version of subversion up to date to
1.3.0 on ports. It fails
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:20:43AM +0800, FreeBSD MailingLists wrote:
> I have a bunch of production servers running 5-Stable branch and I was
> considering upgrading to 6-Stable.
> I have never upgraded across major version changes via source.
> Is this a bad idea?
> what pitfalls should i be awar
You're right my bad. I forgot to run make buildworld first. This chit
has me pretty frustrated.
Thanks,
Wil Hatfield
-Original Message-
From: Anish Mistry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 5:53 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Wil Hatfield
Subjec
On Friday 31 March 2006 20:41, Wil Hatfield wrote:
> Is there a process for upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0 via CVS? Or do I
> need to do this upgrade from CD? Never received this error before.
>
>
> --
>
> >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel
>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
> >>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:34:14PM -0500, daniel wrote:
> Fre
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
> >>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:34:14PM -0500, daniel wrote:
> Fre
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:37:54PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:34:14PM -0500, daniel wrote:
> >>FreeBSD will occasionally release security advisories detailing the
> >>badness
> >>surrounding a single package and will of
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:34:14PM -0500, daniel wrote:
> FreeBSD will occasionally release security advisories detailing the badness
> surrounding a single package and will often include the following as the
> solution:
>
> 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE, 5-STABLE, or 6-STABLE,
On 2/23/06, Jayesh Jayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That was valuable in deed
>
> The 12 server are all identical but the problem is that the test machine
> which we will be using is not of the same class as that of the server.
>
> Then all the server run a custom built kernel and not the ge
On 2/23/06, Jayesh Jayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All are Dell Poweredge servers with identical specification.
>
> I did check the message logs an couldn't find any problem
>
> What are the other aspects which I need to check so as to find a solution.
>
I've had FreeBSD 5.4 randomly reboot on
All are Dell Poweredge servers with identical specification.
I did check the message logs an couldn't find any problem
What are the other aspects which I need to check so as to find a solution.
On 2/23/06, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > That was valuable in deed
> >
>
> That was valuable in deed
>
> The 12 server are all identical but the problem is that the test machine
> which we will be using is not of the same class as that of the server.
>
> Then all the server run a custom built kernel and not the generic one.
>
> By "mode" I meant how to go abo
>
> By mode I meant -- > binary upgrade or cvs mode
If you go to V-6.xxx as suggested, then do a fresh install, that
includes wiping the disk and freshly building the slices and
partitions/file systems. Of course, do the appropriate backups first
and verify them at least a little.
If you are j
By mode I meant -- > binary upgrade or cvs mode
On 2/23/06, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have 12 servers running freebsd. They are basically web servers
> having
> > cpanel control panel.
> >
> > All these server are running FreeBSD 5.4 Release as of now. N
>
> Hi,
>
> We have 12 servers running freebsd. They are basically web servers having
> cpanel control panel.
>
> All these server are running FreeBSD 5.4 Release as of now. Now are thinking
> of upgrading it to 5.4 Stable
>
Hmmm. I wouldn't call that an upgrade really.
Except for a few poss
That was valuable in deed
The 12 server are all identical but the problem is that the test machine
which we will be using is not of the same class as that of the server.
Then all the server run a custom built kernel and not the generic one.
By "mode" I meant how to go about doing this proce
Jayesh Jayan wrote:
Hi,
We have 12 servers running freebsd. They are basically web servers having
cpanel control panel.
All these server are running FreeBSD 5.4 Release as of now. Now are thinking
of upgrading it to 5.4 Stable
Please let me know the merits and demerits of the same. Do you fe
On 2/22/06, andreis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:
> Could you please help us to find out if it is possible to upgrade 10.3.29
> Apache to the latest 10.3.x version through FreeBSD RELENG_5_4 ports? If so,
> any hints as to how to find the right ports would be greatly appreciated.
>
Apache ver
gandalf on 2006-02-13 10:11:12 +0100:
> 2. The server is using a special .so file that was compiled for
> 4.8. We do not have the sources. Will this shared lib work with 6.0?
Probably with the compat4x port, but you'll want to test it out.
> 3. Should I upgrade to 5.4 first, or can I upgrade dir
Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
I've upgradde today, but SSL doesn't work with the old settings. I
suspect something's wrong with my self-signed certificates. If I
set SSLEngine On globally, I get this:
[Tue Jan 31 14:11:09
Thanks a lot.
On 1/31/06, Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Michael S wrote:
> > I have a question related to upgrading my machine from 5.3 to 6.0.
> > I am convinced I need to upgrade it, and the base system upgrade
> > procedure is pretty much clear to me.
On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Michael S wrote:
I have a question related to upgrading my machine from 5.3 to 6.0.
I am convinced I need to upgrade it, and the base system upgrade
procedure is pretty much clear to me. However I am somewhat not clear
about 3rd party software. Since all the programs
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
I've upgradde today, but SSL doesn't work with the old settings. I
suspect something's wrong with my self-signed certificates. If I set
SSLEngine On globally, I get this:
[Tue Jan 31 14:11:09 2006] [warn] RSA server
On Jan 31, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
I've upgradde today, but SSL doesn't work with the old settings. I
suspect something's wrong with my self-signed certificates. If I
set SSLEngine On globally, I get this:
[Tue Jan 31 14:11:09 2006] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
ce
Can always use cvs ?
> I have a machine running FreeBSD i386 6.0 Release and I'd like to know
> how to update my sources to 6-stable. I know I should run cvsup but
> port 5999 tcp is being filtered and there is no socks proxy around. We
> also have CTM, but i think it is not for me...
> Can i get
I recently got a leased server that's running 5.3. It's in Texas.
I'm in Washington. I want to upgrade it to 6-STABLE. In the update
docs it says that "when doing a major release upgrade, it is required
that you boot into single user mode to do the installworld."
Which obviously is a proble
On Monday 05 of December 2005 04:34, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Today, I tried updating xorg-server and it failed. Here is the
> primary error message:
>
> make: don't know how to make /diskad3/portsBuild/Usr/ports/x11-
> servers/xorg-server/work/xc/extras/Mesa/src/mesa/glapi
On Sunday 04 December 2005 19:34, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Today, I tried updating xorg-server and it failed. Here is the
> primary error message:
>
> make: don't know how to make /diskad3/portsBuild/Usr/ports/x11-
> servers/xorg-server/work/xc/extras/Mesa/src/mesa/glapi/gl
On Friday 02 December 2005 03:51 am, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
> hi all.
> i tried to run #portupgrade -arR but got the error below:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] portupgrade -arR
> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 328
> packages found (-7 +128)
> (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.r
On 30 Nov Vizion wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 18:19, the author Diavolo contributed to the
> dialogue on-
> Re: Upgrading to 6.0 Nvidia question:
> >you can use the "kldstat" command to see whether "nvidia.ko" was loaded.
> >if not,a
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 20:52, Vizion wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:02, the author RW contributed to the
> dialogue on-
>
> Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
> >On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the a
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:02, the author RW contributed to the dialogue
on-
Re: Upgrading to 60 question.:
>On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the
>> dialogue on-
>>
>> R
401 - 500 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
