found
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
User Freebsd wrote:
John pointed out a bug that I hadn't noticed, mainly because I was
testing single host ... basically, I installed PHP5 on the backend, and
stupidly didn&
(http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
it in /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly, thanks to John there too ... no
changes to the script itself have been made yet, just a fix on the backend
...
Will work on adding pciconf support in next ...
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, John Nielsen wrote:
Here is a sam
: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
'k folks ... the quick and dirty .. actually, not too dirty ...
The attached script [...]
Can you make this into a port which users can install?
I'm not sure, can I? Can ports install into /etc/periodic? Or is t
t to add the pciconf output next,
and send a v2.0 script as soon as that is ready :)
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgI
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
User Freebsd wrote this message on Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 22:44 -0300:
For those that haven't been following the discussion on this, the iir(4)
driver in FreeBSD 6.x appears to have a deadlock issue under medium to
heavy load, where the 'bloc
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Antony Mawer wrote:
On 4/08/2006 3:17 AM, User Freebsd wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This is cool and all, but why are the concentration solely on PCI
devices? pciconf output doesn't tell you directly what
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Antony Mawer wrote:
On 4/08/2006 3:17 AM, User Freebsd wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Matthew Seaman wrote:
This is cool and all, but why are the concentration solely on PCI devices?
pciconf output doesn't tell you directly what CPUs are in the system or
even how many
ystem uses -- all of which would be
important information that might just persuade hardware manufacturers to
provide more FreeBSD support. Surely a condensed version of
/var/run/dmesg.boot is more to the point.
/var/run/dmesg.boot can't be relied on, unfortunately ... I've had *
d= cases, there
won't be a 'Device' listed ...
As to class= ... what table am I supposed to be seeing at that URL?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Antony Mawer wrote:
On 4/08/2006 4:58 AM, User Freebsd wrote:
Getting a list of devices is actually pretty easy, and I've tried this on
my 4.x machines also, so it isn't something that will be a problem on older
versions:
# pciconf -l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
'market missed'
...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
se
query_string=$query_string`echo $line | sed -e 's/^ *//' -e 's/
*=/=/' -e 's/= */=/' -e 's/ $//'`"&"
fi
done
------
__
sted ...
report.php would take the IP:getid pair, and store one record per device
into the database, from which stats could be very easily generated using
standard SQL queries ...
STEP 3:
fetch http://bsdstats.hub.org/report_sys.php?id=`cat /tmp/getid`&system=`uname
-mr | sed 's/\ /+/g&#
me kind by vendor, working in FreeBSD X.Y,
broken, etc. The XML should be easily outputted on the fly to XHTML so
it can be reviewed by devolopers and what not. Just my too cents...
'k, right now, we are trying to get the data from the remote clients to a
central server ... if you are thinki
MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
rking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 2006/08/02 15:37, User Freebsd seems to have typed:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
This may sound dumb but why don't we just put a registration link on the
FreeBSD main page... or "registration" in sysinstall. Isn'
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
This may sound dumb but why don't we just put a registration link on the
FreeBSD main page... or "registration" in sysinstall. Isn't this how
everyone else handles the problem?
User A installs FreeBSD, registers, works with it
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 8/1/06, User Freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
> Ok.. lets start from the top, again. Why do we need uniqueness?
We want to count each host reporting *once* ... without uniqueness per
host, ho
ier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.h
. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 8/1/06, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
User Freebsd writes:
> Actually, using ifconfig wouldn't work ... it would give unique, but as
> soon as you add another IP (ie. alias), the ID would change ... you'd
need
&
//www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Huff wrote:
User Freebsd writes:
Actually, using ifconfig wouldn't work ... it would give unique, but as
soon as you add another IP (ie. alias), the ID would change ... you'd need
to do something like:
ifconfig | grep ether | sha256 | md5
since
at they do support
FreeBSD. Making big statements in public that they don't, or that it's
not up to ones' standards or hopes, isn't terribly useful or productive.
I'd hate for FreeBSD to turn into That Other BSD that publically abuses
and harasses vendors for percieved sleights
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Rico Secada wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:44:01 -0300 (ADT)
User Freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems to me like the best solution is to boykott Adaptec like OpenBSD did.
Actually, based on the thread going on on -stable right now, from ppl that
are talk
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 7/31/06, User Freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
> Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
>>> Counting portsnap and cvsup accesses is non-
x27;t work, since NAT'd networks would all use the same IP ...
even non-NAT'd networks would have the risk of being on dynamic IPs, so
that again doesn't work ...
(20 + 32) bytes * (10^7) = 495.910645 megabytes. The FreeBSD team would
need a 6.6Mbit/s uplink to handle peak load assum
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:51:59AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
That's really really bad news. Oddly, ICP Vortex Germany told me
the opposite wr/t to their new line of cards. They said, they
were working on full FreeBSD support.
A quick follow up on this email ... please note that I have not, in this
email, pointed to anything but the iir(4) driver, and, more specifically,
the GDT controller card ...
I have been using Adaptec products since the early 90's, and, until
upgrading to FreeBSD 6.x, *never*
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as most
ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless headaches
...
Official word from Adaptec is that
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:49:27PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
platform, so, I either live with the deadlocks, or try and figure out a
suitable replacement for the card
ate on why this is a
privacy issue?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Counting portsnap and cvsup accesses is non-intrusive - i.e. nothing
sent from local host - will count systems from any version of
FreeBSD, but will never count everything because
'k, I finally got ahold of someone @ adaptec, and the official word seems
to be:
"FreeBSD 6 is not officially supported for the "GDT" based ICP RAID
controllers. Nevertheless the inbox driver should work."
Great, well, the inbox driver doesn't work with Fre
I have a remote server, running the above RAID controller, that, as most
ppl here have seen over the past few weeks, is causing endless headaches
...
Official word from Adaptec is that FreeBSD is no longer a supported
platform, so, I either live with the deadlocks, or try and figure out a
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
But this will then only count from the first version(s) of FreeBSD which
contain the periodic job. Then every machine running an earlier release
would be a ghost.
Agreed, but any "active" counting will fail dealing with older machines,
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 8:42 PM, User Freebsd wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
We can also collect the access information of the cvsup server and
portsnap server, can't we?
What does that
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote:
Colin Percival wrote:
There are still a lot of people (particularly on pre-6.0 systems) who
are using CVSup rather than portsnap for updating their ports trees.
Also, I would guess that some people who run multiple FreeBSD systems,
use some
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
Approximately 15000 portsnap snapshots (i.e., /var/db/portsnap or
/usr/local/portsnap directories) are being kept updated on systems
which send HTTP requests to portsnap*.freebsd.org. Of
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
We can also collect the access information of the cvsup server and
portsnap server, can't we?
What does that give?
Approximately 15000 portsnap snapshots (i.e., /var/db/portsnap or
/usr/local/portsnap directories) are
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
We can also collect the access information of the cvsup server and
portsnap server, can't we?
What does that give?
Approximately 15000 portsnap snapshots (i.e., /var/db/portsnap or
/usr/local/portsnap directories) are
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
People like me who only use FreeBSD on the laptop would certainly give
much shorter uptimes. Okay, I just wanna say, it's very strange to a
mobile/desktop user.
Again, I wasn't thinking so much about uptimes as the fact that the
info
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:16:55PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
And my point is that those not supporting FreeBSD already don't care,
since as far as they are concerned, their is no market for them to be
losing not buying their products
t one might in the short
term see as the best tool may not be such in 2 years when support is dropped
and you are in a forced obsolescence and have to replace it with something
else... So making value judgments like tools that are known to be well
supported on FReeBSD for example is part of determ
s NTP
Server, without getting permissions first, and, thereby, flooding him with
NTP requests ...
People just don't realize just how very big the Internet is.
That is the problem, yes ... nobody knows how big the FreeBSD community is
... :)
Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
Yes and no. Not all cvsup servers are under the control of the FreeBSD
project but you are right, they could log the release tag and more.
Also don't forget about website stats, mailing list subscriptions, and
ftp servers.
None of
MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
My shop runs 30+ FreeBSD hosts, and I have several more for personal
use. But of those there are maybe 2-3 that I would be ok with listing
and exactly zero that I will actually list. It's not that I don't want
to help, but I'm not
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Atom Powers wrote:
On 7/28/06, User Freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Towards that end, as a starter, I would like to encourage everyone out
there running 1 or more FreeBSD boxes to go to
http://www.mreriksson.net/uptimes
register all of your host
27;t losing any ...
Although I'd eventually like to see something better that includes more
information (ie. version of FreeBSD being run, AMD vs Intel, etc), even
just getting #s on the size of the community that we are apart of would be
good
Also, for the data to *mean* anything
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Amitabh Kant wrote:
I see the whole issue this way: companies are free to choose whether to
support FreeBSD or not, and I am free to choose/recommend their product
in my installations. It's only when we start to speak with our money
bags, that it will make comme
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
What we really need is score card to keep track of the good and bad
companies. Someone with initiative could have this up and running in a
day or less... After it's up we can put a BIG HONKING LINK on the
FreeBSD main page.
iting icmp unreach response from 6646 to 200
packets/sec
^C
And its been going on for several hours now ... :(
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, User Freebsd wrote:
Two part question here ...
first part ... is there a way of just disabling icmp by setting a sysctl, so
that a server just doesn't respo
. 7615664
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:36:51PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Nikolas Britton wrote:
* No binary blob drivers.
This is one that I don't necessarily agree with ... if Adaptec came out
with a *supported* iir driver, but i
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 7/26/2006 10:34, User Freebsd seems to have typed:
Supporting 3ware is good, but what if/when Adaptec buys them out ...
Adaptec doesn't officially support FreeBSD, therefore, anyone they buy out
would most likely change their policy accord
. 7615664
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 7/26/2006 07:35, User Freebsd seems to have typed:
The point is, if we keep acting as "individuals", vendors will treat as
unimportant ... if we start acting like an organization, and actually
*lobby* these vendors for better support,
Your mail to 'freebsd-emulation' with the subject
Barclays IBank Security Measure.
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam
Either the message will get posted to th
rgICQ . 7615664
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Tamouh H. wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:16 PM, Nikolas Britton wrote:
ICP Vortex is an Adaptec company and Adaptec doesn't
support FreeBSD.
We've already been over this once.
Not to disagree with you, but Adaptec put new drivers for 5.3
and 5.4 for their
- End Message ---
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Oops, forgot about that. Use 5.x then. The statement is that newer
versions of FreeBSD are slower than older versions. The point was that
this isn't relevant to 90% of users for reasons I already cited.
IMHO, I'm not so concerne
f tracking who is using FreeBSD, what
they are using it for (narrow scope, ie. web hosting, firewall, etc ...
nothing fancy there), but, also, eventually extended to include
information about the OS itself (none sensitive information only):
Version of OS
Hardware Drivers In Use
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, jan gestre wrote:
On 7/23/06, User Freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On various lists, including this one, there is talk about how to we make
hardware vendors sit up and take more notice of us ... alot of the
negative responses back seem to be 'we are too
numbers of
desktops and servers deployed with FreeBSD ...
What I'd love to see is a *project initiated* (or FreeBSD Foundation)
FreeBSD reporting mechanism similar to:
http://www.mreriksson.net/uptimes/myuptimes
Something just for FreeBSD users (well, all *BSD users sh
octl (if_plip.c line 302) to print out some
identifying information about the process doing the ioctl? Or is
there a better list somewhere to ask this question?
-- George Mitchell
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
I've "solved" my /dev/lpt0 problem. Here is what happened:
1. I observed that the problem is also happening on FreeBSD 6.0.
2. It isn't happening on 5.3.
3. I sprinkled some printf's into lptopen in sys/dev/ppbus/lpt.c.
4. I compiled a new kernel, stripping a whole bun
sh/redir.c,
"cannot OPEN /dev/lpt0").
Help! -- George Mitchell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
vices on ppbus0:
ppbus0: PJL,PCLXL,PCL,EPSONFX,IBMPPR
plip0: on ppbus0
lpt0: on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
ppi0: on ppbus0
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubs
;
pp->rw is 0
So then I returned to my shell prompt and typed in:
cat /dev/null >/dev/lpt0
and that hung up uninterruptibly. What's going on?
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, unmodified generic kernel. All this worked normally
under 5.3, though that ne
MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
47PM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:13:57 -0700
Eric Lakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to setup a DL360 G4 for use in a colo environment with
FreeBSD. I've run into one problem: I've setup the iLo to use the
"shared network" option, which
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Tamouh H. wrote:
I have to put my two cents here:
1) I agree with few posters that FreeBSD performance have been lacking
behind. I've reported few issues on performance list and many did. We
offered few pre-production servers for performance testing, but the
answ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DW
Posted At: Thursday, July 13, 2006 2:06 PM
Posted To: FreeBSD-Questions
Conversation: *bsd firewall appliance?
Subject: Re: *bsd firewall appliance?
Philippe Lang wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
hub.orgICQ . 7615664_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
Simply enabling SMP on a single processor system
adds 20-25% overhead in freebsd 6.1. Again,
readily admitted/accepted by the developers.
There is no way to recover that in efficiency, at
least not
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Eric wrote:
User Freebsd wrote:
I just put a linksys router in place, so that we could use our wireless
laptop, well, wireless ... now, I seem to be getting timeouts on my ssh
connections when they are idle, but timeouts that I never received when I
had my desktop
ices (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
AIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e
are 60G vs the 72G SAS I'm using ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
_____
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jun 28, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
growing number of places (ie. Adaptec / Intel) appear to be dropping
support for it as well ...
Many places are starting support for FreeBSD, or increased support, as well
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031
The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au
Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
nd returned a non-zero exit status: 127
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/All/gtk-2.8.19.tbz
** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 127
** Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/All/gtk-2.8.19.tgz
To whom it may concern :
We, among the few advanced FreeBSD users of Thailand, have been using
FreeBSD, Desktop mode (with the emphasis on Desktop) for quite sometime. As
you may know copyright infringement is a concern in countries like Thailand.
In order to avoid such problems, we think
3365 7031
The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au
Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
#Union filesystem
options NULLFS #NULL filesystem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi,
I have a problem with the scanner Canoscan Lide 60 with FreeBSD 6.1.
This is sopported in sane but scanimage -L not find it.
If I try whith sane-find-scanner I read:
---
searching for USB scanners:
checking /dev/uscanner... failed to open (Invalid argument)
checking /dev/uscanner0... failed
)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 04 mei 2006, at 01:51, Peter A. Giessel wrote:
On 5/3/2006 15:38, FreeBSD mailing list seems to have typed:
Mac OSX can't be installed onto a UFS formatted drive as far as I
know
Most OSX programs won't run on it either
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106692
On 29 apr 2006, at 15:28, Yousef Raffah wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 09:11 -0400, John Cruz wrote:
I don't know about HFS, but you can format your mac drives with
UFS when
you do a clean install of MacOS, at least then FreeBSD would be
able to
read them.
You are right but this isn
Dear list,
How can I non-manually remove the "^M" line breaks from my text files
TIA
zheyu
_______
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dear list
Is there a memory test suite other them memtest86/memtest86+
TIA
zheyu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
301 - 400 of 721 matches
Mail list logo
