You can't use linux drivers in BSD, but you might be able to port linux driver
to FreeBSD.
Ken
Hi,
I've installed an internal Smartlink HSP56
Micromodem pci modem on the first pci slot of my
H30CF jetway motherboard with(if i'm not mistakem)
only one com1 port and a com2 header which i think
Quoting stan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a way, in FreeBSD 4 STABLE, to determine what a given machine's
intrupt (PCI intrupt assignment) ussage is?
--
They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety.
Quoting Michal Pasternak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]:
You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop,
right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4
2.8GHz running the same OS.
... but will it outperform it also
Quoting Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have 2 fxp Intel 100mb cards in this machine that work fine. I have ran
it with 3 fxp
cards in the past. I added an em0, Intel gigabit this morning. The card
displays a
non active status during the boot process. RC.conf is processed and the
card
does
for auto-negotiation to finish.
Ken
Michael Clark
Nemschoff Chairs Inc
mclark at nemschoff dot com
CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP
Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294
Fax: (920) 453 6594
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Culver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 3:39 PM
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they
say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to
be changed) So now I come to a cross
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote:
It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure
what the
laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD,
it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to clarify exactly what you mean. I can the x86 version of BSD with no
changes to the BIOS, jumpers or anything on an AMD64?
Sorry in advanced if this is a stupid question, Ive never dealt with
anything but x86
Yeah, no changes anywhere. I have my machine set
Quoting David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:17:35AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
Thats one of the processor's features. :-)
You can't run amd64 binaries when
Quoting Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi All!!!
I think that WinXP more popular and more easy than FreeBSD. People
all over the world know what is Windows but don't know what is
FreeBSD. More programs is written work on Windows
Windows more comfortable in work with graph...
If
I have used postfix and sendmail on both linux and FreeBSD and I definitely
prefer postfix. For starters, its security track-record is much better. Also it
was very easy to ste up a system that uses mysql with virtual domains, SASL for
relay authentication (also interfacing with mysql) etc... I
Quoting Daniel Hawton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SoloCDM wrote:
Why do the ISOs seem to be three CDs of 600Mb each for RedHat compared
to 1.5 CDs for FreeBSD? I thought the files were larger with FreeBSD
and its tarballs.
Does FreeBSD offer all the packages from A to Z in their CDs?
There
Quoting Daniel Hawton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
4.4BSD Lite 2 is BSD.. which is from SysV.. heh That's what I said.
But that's my point, it's NOT from SysV. It's always been it's own thing,
parellel to SysV. It had some ATT code in it at some point, but is not from
SysV.
Ken
Kenneth Culver wrote
Quoting Matthew Faircliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if openoffice 1.1 (openoffice-devel) works with the native
java (diablo-jdk13)?
Matthew Faircliff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Quoting Khalil Khozeimeh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have configured a FreeBSD 4.8 system as a filtering bridge/firewall using
the IPFW. I am interested in enabling FTP clients from inside the firewall
to access FTP servers on the outside. It will be appreciated if somebody can
point me in the
Quoting Stas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Does FreeBSD supports ALSA drivers?
No it doesn't.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
G'day all ...
Simple question, I would hope ... I want to spec out a new server, and
want to compare AMD vs Intel ... is there anything online that gives
approx equivalents? ie. a Xeon 2.4Ghz
Quoting Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:09:15PM -0500, Craig Reyenga wrote:
I've heard that Sony and Dell don't support UNIX permissions on their
proprietary hard drives. Stick with WinXP for now until a patch is committed
into the source tree.
I'm a little confused on
Quoting Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:25 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Marc Wiz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:53:38PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
OK. The price difference for AMD vs. Intel is pretty significant,
but be aware that you'll also pay a
Quoting Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 10, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Feb 10, 2004, at 5:25 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Marc Wiz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:53:38PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
OK
Quoting Goodleaf, John M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I cvsup'd the ports this AM and have tried to build firefox. Actually, it
builds fine, it's the install that fails. I've tried on two machines, one
running 4.9-STABLE and the other running 5.2-RELEASE. In both cases the the
install fails with
Quoting Bob Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004, Chuck Swiger clacked the keyboard to produce:
Peter Leftwich wrote:
Can someone recommend software that lets you mount TO freebsd (ufs)
partition FROM WITHIN Windows XP Pro SP1 (transparently)?
I am not familiar with any such software,
Quoting Spades [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have a AMD XP 2000 system, can i install FreeBSD 4.7-REL?
Of course, you can install any pc operating system on this machine. although 4.7
is old and I'd reccommend 4.9 since it's the latest 4.x
Ken
___
[EMAIL
Quoting Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi people
I have a little problem whith the flash plugin on my BSD box. I
installed the flash plugin port whithout problem but these not work ,
it showme a black screen in the place of the plugin and no picture
no animation no nothing :-(. i try
Quoting Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry .. but i installed both the linuxflash plugin port and the
bsd(flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.10_5 ) port and i tested the bsd port
whit mozilla and epiphany ..and due to this instalation does not work
i have to install the linux ports(flash and
Quoting Osmany Guirola Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I feel very happy when I saw in the nvidia site the drivers for linux
and of course for FREEBSD, and I need to Know what about ATI and
FREEBSD(linux not have problems) drivers because I will acquire a new
machine and I need to decide between a ATI
Quoting Lucas Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you are going to run freebsd 5.2.1 there aren't a lot of hoops to
get an ATI card to work, but some people have reported better frame
rates and less graphical glitches with nVidia cards.
I have an ATI Radeon 9000 64mb AGP in my PC and its working fine. I
Quoting Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Osmany Guirola Cruz wrote:
I feel very happy when I saw in the nvidia site the drivers for linux
and of course for FREEBSD, and I need to Know what about ATI and
FREEBSD(linux not have problems) drivers because I will acquire a new
machine and I need to decide
After it sees my CD-RW (acd0) it should then recognize my DVD drive. I
don't know why it doesn't show, as the BIOS sees it, and that DVD-ROM
drives are supported in FreeBSD 4.7.
I did some playing around with drive configs and found out some
interesting things. I first unplugged the CD-RW
There are none currently. The solution is to use your secondary IDE
channel for your optical drives, your Primary IDE channel for your boot
drive and a secondary controller (They're dirt cheap, like $25) for any
other drives. Keeping your Hard drives at 1/channel improves
performance, since
Maybe you should try to use a later version of FreeBSD before becoming sad
:-) I'm not sure that would help, but then we'd at least be sure that the
latest kernel still has the same problem or behavior that you're seeing.
It could also have something to do with the dedicated disklabel.
Ken
On
There was a port of vmware2 to freebsd before. It doesn't require having
access to the closed-source part of vmware 3, in fact, the port should for
the most part be pretty straightforward, I was planning on trying it but I
ran out of time and won't have time again until June at the earliest.
Ken
I'd looked over the Ethernet-virtualization drivers, and I thought they
were pretty ugly (and accordingly scary), but given your previous
success with tweaking the Linuxulator, I'm willing to accept your
assessment.
Well, it's not really just my assessment, it's actually in
net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2
net.inet.udp.blackhole=1
kern.ps_showallprocs=0
You can make these lines take effect without reboot in the following
manner (as root):
sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2
sysctl -w net.inet.udp.blackhole=1
sysctl -w kern.ps_showallprocs=0
rebooting would also make
I can't reboot. This is a server.
Why are you even running X on a server? I know this doesn't help your
problem, but it's generally not a good idea to run X on servers.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Yes, I know, but this server is also my workstation (it's just a home
server).
ok, well like the other people said... did you try kill -9 as root on the
process in question? If you did, and it still won't die, most likely
you'll have to reboot.
Ken
Reboot! :)
Hey, she's not talking about Windows ;-)
Sounds like her video card is hung, and in that case, the only thing to do
is reboot, as much as it sucks.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I am an extreme newbie at FreeBSD. I have it installed but when I go
into the Xserver in either of the two GUIs I get a weird mouse that
seems to only be able to stay on the very top of the screen and has
no vertical movement.
I have it setup on Auto and PS/2 Busmouse settings.
Yes, my ISP's DHCP server should assign me a hostname. I assumed that's
how it was done by dhclient on RedHat7.3/8/9 all of which just did this
automatically whenever I selected DHCP configuration of the interface.
I've been comparing FreeBSD 5.1's default dhclient-script to RedHat's
trying
Why is the Logo of FreeBSD an devil
What have an oparating System to do with the devil
Of course, there is something like daemon's (under Windows called services)
but this is not the meaning of deamon!!!
I think the meaning of daemon is
d=disk
a=and
e=? (i don't know)
I have spent a lot of time on FreeBSD.org web pages, but I still can not
find
VERY SIMPLE answer for this question:
what version of FreeBSD should I use ?
I need system which is VERY STABLE, with as few possibilities to hack as
possible
(the best is absolutely closed :-) ), running only
Thanks for quick response.
I have thought so, but I want to be sure. There is also 4.7. Do you think
better to use 4.8 ?
It's best to use the latest 4.x
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Sendmail works fine in FreeBSD 4.8. Named is considered insecure
because people use it. If you pick another product to be safe, make
sure no one uses it. Any suggestion on this list would be to popular
to be safe. As I said in my last email, people find holes in popular
software more
Well, but what about djbdns ?
Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
I think it is, as you use it :-)
I have never heard about it.
It's complient with whatever standards there are governing DNS. And it
works very well for me.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, but what about djbdns ?
Decent program, but the license is awful.
yeah, the licence is wierd.
Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
No, it is not. The configuration is not even remotely close, and the author
refuses to support parts of the RFC that he feels to be problematic.
It
Well, but what about djbdns ?
Is it fully compatible with BIND ?
I think it is, as you use it :-)
I have never heard about it.
no, try powerdns instead :)
Depends on what he means by compatible. I took this to mean will it
communicate with bind servers and the answer is yes it can be
The standard dhclient-script sets the hostname. At least, it sure
*looks* like it does... [line 97 of
src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/scripts/freebsd,v 1.9.2.6]
OK, yeah, it does, so there must be some other configuration that needs to
be done.
Ken
___
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Jason Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 06:14:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering how to modify the appropriate files to setup a FreeBSD
computer to act as a NAT Router, that would do the following:
Check the natd(8) man page, it should give you
You can use the sound module, or recompile your kernel with device pcm,
but I doubt very seriously that the nforce2 audio is supported.
Ken
uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
pci0: serial bus, USB at device 2.2 (no driver attached)
pci0: network, ethernet at device 4.0 (no driver
Is there any standard (or non) FreeBSD tool that is used to measure a
current network throughput/bandwidth? And also, what are the
requirements to do so, and do I need to be root to run, or do I need to
load a special kernel module?
Just run systat -if 1
That will tell you what you want to
why would ya want to route lo1 127.0.0.1 to a 192.x.x. address ???
seems to me that there are to many system side processes that listen or
ocmmunicate thru that...giving access or routing that traffic to a
internal address ...doesnt seem to smart to me.
This is basically what I just said.
why would ya want to route lo1 127.0.0.1 to a 192.x.x. address ???
seems to me that there are to many system side processes that listen or
ocmmunicate thru that...giving access or routing that traffic to a
internal address ...doesnt seem to smart to me.
--
I wouldn't; I was using that as an
I personally would go with FreeBSD as a router. I have been used both a
200Mhz P1 and a 300Mhz P2 as routers with out problems. I personally
have really liked being able to ssh into it su to root and change what
ever I want to. It makes for a really flexible system.
BTW I would suggest
As a Note, the top end routers out there, Junipers, run JunOS, which is
a FreeBSD variant. A Juniper M160 can route OC192's at wire speed
(That's 10Gb/s folks).
However, the way those are set up, FreeBSD doesn't do the actual routing,
as far as I can remember they upload a routing table to the
Coming from a Network Engineering perspective, I'm interested in having
my servers be as redundant as possible. I have two NIC's in the
machine, so I would like for the server to be reachable over either
interface.
To my mind, I would give a loopback interface an IP address that is the
(FreeBSD 4.8 and FreeBSD 3.3)
Oh, I've never tried it on 4.x. It works on my -CURRENT boxes though:
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10
Load Average
Interface Traffic PeakTotal
lo0 in
man brandelf
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Yusuf UZUNAY wrote:
Hi!
when i was trying to run a linux program in FreeBSD i
take an error like ELF file ABI version invalid! Ýs
there anyone who has got some idea about this error?
Thanks!
-yusuf
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Are you sure you're running the linux emulator kernel module?
Ken
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Yusuf UZUNAY wrote:
i tried it too! But no result! :(
--- Kenneth Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's a linux program you want to brandelf using
Linux instead of
FreeBSD as the name.
Ken
I think that you've just been unlucky in buying two hard drives or
whatever which have failed prematurely. I think if there was such a
bug in FreeBSD, a lot more people than you would be complaining and
heaven and earth would be being moved in order to fix it.
I would have to agree that it's
well , i am a final year student in my computer engineering
course.
All i have to ask is IS THERE IS AN IMPLEMENTATION OF CIFS , Common
Internet File System
AVAILABLE ON FREEBSD?
i'll be waiting for your
As far as I know, what you want is also
Hi,
yes, samba is available for freebsd. but i mean whether a CIFS client
is available or not?
plz reply
smbclient comes with samba, and you can use smbfs.
Ken
___
[EMAIL
I am trying to set up a FreeBSD 5.1 i386 box. Everything seems to be
fine, except, incoming ftp is all rejected. Inetd.conf is set to allow
ftp. Is there another switch to set somewhere to allow all incoming
ftp? If so, what/where?
is inetd even starting? I don't think that inetd starts
Hi,
I need your help, I bougth FreeBSD4.8 (Build Operating System: FreeBSD
4.8 i386 [ELF] ) from FreeBSD Mall, but I have problems I can't
configure my xwindow I'm attachement the log file.
My video card is: Nvidia TNT2 64m
My monitor is: LG studioworks 500G 15''
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
My rc.conf file appears to be broken in some way, and this is preventing
my system from booting. It boots to a heavily resticted system, with
only the / file system mounted and the statically linked binaries
available. Problem is, I can't edit my
It happens because for some reason, the later kdm's don't seem to want to
start xconsole. I'm not sure why though, I've never had time to mess with
it.
Ken
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, CARTER Anthony wrote:
When I boot my machine, I get the following message at the command prompt
before it launches
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Tim Kellers wrote:
How about AIM?
/usr/ports/net/aim
It requires Linux emulation, but I think gaim does, too.
Tim Kellers
CPE/NJIT
AIM does require linux emulation, but gaim doesn't.
Ken
On Saturday 31 May 2003 03:17 pm, Steven Lake wrote:
Just
cscope works well for C, don't know about the other ones.
Ken
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Michal Pasternak wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for some sort of software which would allow me
to generate C/C++ (and preferably other languages, like Python
or PHP) references for a given project. Suppose I am
Does your monitor support higher resolutions? If you have an old monitor,
did you put proper values in the monitor section of your XF86Config?
Ken
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Rik Scarborough wrote:
I cannot get the resolution for X above 800x600 (although I'm not sure,
it could be one smaller than
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Rik Scarborough wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Does your monitor support higher resolutions? If you have an old monitor,
did you put proper values in the monitor section of your XF86Config?
It's a new flat screen monitor. I've pretty much ignored
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] haifa touati wrote:
Hi all, I tried to ssh to a remote machine from a FreeBSD 4.5 machine,
but I received ... connection refused message. However I succeeded to
connect to this machine from Windows. Are there any specifics settings
to fix this? Thanks in
years ago I used a VAX VMS system that automatically saved file versions
whenever a file name was clobbered.
I've seen wrapper scripts for vi to accomplish the same but it would be
nice if someone had actually implemented something at the file system
level to do this. Anyone know of
I have been looking for NAT program which is not part of some other
program like NATD is part of IPFW or IPNAT is part of IPFILTER or NAT of
user ppp. I can not find any NAT program in the FBSD ports collection
unless I mis-understood some description. If anybody knows of one
please let me
I've read that there are multiple kernels for BSD. What does FreeBSD
use? Can I swap it out for other kernels? Or am I mistaken?
FreeBSD uses the FreeBSD kernel. You can recompile it using the source for
the FreeBSD kernel, but it is the only kernel that works with FreeBSD.
Ken
Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of
some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-)
No, but you can go the other way around. You MIGHT be able to use the 5.x
libc directly on 4.x, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Ken
Not sure if this will actually help you but I recall thinking my sound
wasn't working after a recent KDE install. Turned out that it was simply
installing the desktop without explicit sound assignments for system
events (so it merely seemed like sound wasn't working, yet no pop up
errors when
No you can't - it relies on the 5.1 kernel.
OK, well I wasn't sure how much things had changed as far as the ABI goes,
so I didn't want to rule it out.
Ken
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 07:58 PM, Laszlo Vagner wrote:
I just updated to 5.1-r and was wondering how to add soundcard support
to the
kernel.?
in 4.8 i just added 'device pcm' in my kernel config and recompiled
but 5.1 is different
and i dont want to do something to mess things up.
I wrote a small utility that can tell you.
http://www.glue.umd.edu/~culverk/ifbwmon-0.1.tar.gz
just untar it, cd to the directory that gets created, type make, then run
the resulting executable like this:
ifbwmon fxp0
replace 'fxp0' with whatever ethernet interface you use.
Ken
On Tue, 8
vchans probably aren't working right with your sound card yet. I had a
problem for a while with my soundcard, but it seems to be working fine now
with vchans.
Ken
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
Hi,
Any now an then, mostly now :(, when I simoultaniosly use more that one
sound
At that point, only 1 application at a time will be able to access the
soundcard at 1 time.
Ken
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 17:09, Kenneth Culver wrote:
vchans probably aren't working right with your sound card yet. I had
a problem for a while with my
I'm under KDE ;), so it starts up.
buh# ps ax | grep artsd
706 ?? S 0:28.09 /usr/local/bin/artsd -F 10 -S 4096 -s 60 -m
artsmessage -l 3 -f
and i suppose it's the suspect.
I've tried
artsdsp -v aviplay %f Marlene\ Dietrich_Peter.mp3
and got (no hang):
-
artsdsp:
The fact that it is a moderated forum leads me to believe that the
slashdot operators are themselves FreeBSD bigots. I for one have much
less respect for Slashdot for allowing that drivel through.
They don't usually let it through per say, you have to browse the comments
at a very low Score
I used a port scanner on my server just to check things out. I wasn't
expecting this. Port 22 (ssh) and port (25) SMTP are up. I looked in
/etc/inetd.conf and SMTP is comented out.
I created a webmailer and sure enough, all my e-mail was recieved but not
sent out. If this isn't a default
You could run two natd daemons on the gateway machine, one for the win
machine and one for the macs. Just start another natd listening on
another port, and add a ipfw divert rule to send the traffic from the
macs through this new natd.
Or you could use ipfilter+ipnat, and just add two
I was just wondering if anyone else had seen this problem... I'm assuming it's
permissions related but I'm not sure exactly how to fix it...
basically when I log in and use startx kdesu works fine, but if I login using
kdm (started from /etc/ttys) kdesu just hangs when I try to use it for
I recall seeing in the man page that DUMMYNET has RED and GRED
algorithms built in - I don't know any more detail than that though...
It also Has W2FQ+ (or something like that) fair queueing, although I
havn't tried to set it up in a while, last time I used it, it worked
great.
Ken
To
On Friday 20 September 2002 04:22 am, Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 02:52:59AM -0400, James Dean wrote:
ttyv8 /usr/local/bin/kdmxterm on secure
I keep getting these errors messages in my logs:
Sep 7 13:00:28 bsdguru kdm_config[12241]: Unknown command line
I just setup a 4.6.2 machine locally on my network at home to replace an
aging Linux NAT box I had going. Clients behind the new box can only get
100k/sec downloads while clients behind the old Linux box (running ipchains)
get 400k/sec+ downloads off the same cable modem. Locally on the
Yeh, but is he downloading from the same place with every test?
To be honest, you should be testing the performace across a
reliable link that doesn't change. This way you can tell if it is
related to the machine versus it being an upstream network
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 05:12 pm, Deepankar Das wrote:
All,
Has anyone tried building FreeBSD 4.6 with GCC 3.2? I am seeing
pre-processor problems during the make depend stage. Anything
that I need to know to make GCC 3.2 build FreeBSD 4.6?
Thanks,
Deepankar
I'm just curious, but why
FreeBSD supports whatever memory your chipset supports. I don't think
there is any specific driver support to allow an OS to use DDR over SDR
SDRAM. So yes, it does, and so does any other OS that runs on a PC.
Ken
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
I ferreted around but could not find
I have this motherboard and have not seen any problems. If you are seeing
problems I'd suggest tweaking your bios a bit... That always helps me...
Ken
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Simon1 wrote:
As a follow up to my initial post:
A brand new board, with new memory, and a new processor failed to fix
Have you tried running cdrecord as root?
Ken
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Bjarne Wichmann Petersen wrote:
Hi!
I've just upgraded to a new kernel that includes ATAPI/CAM. Now I'm trying to
figure out how to use this with eg. cdbakeoven and I don't have much success.
Eg. if I try to copy a music-CD,
it.
Ken
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Interesting, FreeBSD's linux-ulator doesn't implement mmap2, or
ftruncate64 linux syscalls, so if it's working, that's pretty odd because
I know winex needs these syscalls.
Ken
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Travis P. wrote:
Just incase
folder over to your FreeBSD system. In some cases,
installers fail to work, but the game runs fine.
.. tlp
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Kenneth Culver wrote:
FreeBSD constantly spits out mmap2 errors in ttyv0, however, it doesn't
seem to effect game play in StarCraft.
Hrmm, maybe I'll mess
Yep - I'm using them on 4.7-RELEASE right now. Myth II runs great :)
Quake 3, Wolfenstein, tuxracer, and UT2003 all work on my machine.
However, ut2003 refused to work on my hardware while using the nvidia
agpgart. I had to switch to using FreeBSD's agpgart.
Ken
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
You don't really write patches... you write code in the current code
that's already there, and then you use diff to generate patches...
this is very easy if you are using cvs to keep track of your code...
cvs diff file.c (I like to use cvs diff -u but that's personal
preferance).
if you aren't
I had them working just fine on -RELEASE.
Ken
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, lewiz wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:25:39AM +0530, Gautham Ganapathy wrote:
Will the nvidia drivers work with 4.7-RELEASE? 4.7-STABLE won't have
ISOs, right?
You need 4.7-STABLE to get the NVidia drivers working. I
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE as of a couple of days ago... and
it seems that FreeBSD is not detecting the total amount of ram that I have
on my system. I have 512M but here's my dmesg (where memory is concerned:
real memory = 402669568 (393232K bytes)
Physical memory chunk(s):
Hi,
This is in addition to my last mail. Just to reiterate, I'm using
FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE as of a few days ago, and I've never seen this problem
before. The wierd message comes from /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c:
Too many holes in the physical address space, giving up
It prints before
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
