Am 24.01.2019 um 15:09 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
> Am 24.01.2019 um 03:49 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:37:46PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 23.01.2019 um 21:27 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 0
Hi List.
Am 25-01-2019 01:01, schrieb PiBa-NL:
Hi List,
Attached a regtest which i 'think' should pass.
** s1 0.0 === expect tbl.dec[1].key == ":authority"
s1 0.0 EXPECT tbl.dec[1].key (host) == ":authority" failed
It seems to me the Host <> Authority conversion isn't happening
p
Hi.
Am 25-01-2019 08:55, schrieb Kevin Zhu:
HI HAProxy Team,:
I am trying to use Intel qat work with HAProxy-1.9.0, but it work very
unstable. and i had other try HAProxy-1.8.16 and it work will, How can
i find what is wrong?
1.8.16 and 1.9.0 use same hardwave and system to running and compil
Am 29.01.2019 um 06:52 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.3 was released on 2019/01/29. It added 35 new commits after
> version 1.9.2.
>
> It mainly addresses a few stability issues affecting versions up to 1.9.2.
> Several of these issues are only reproducible when using H2 to connect
Hi.
I plan to use HAProxy 1.9.x cache with ~50-100k Objects which will could use
1-2G RAM.
Have anyone used the cache features in prod with such specs?
The Idea is to use HAProxy in AUS for a Webserver in FR for caching as the
latency delays the delivery from FR to AUS Clients.
Thank you for
Hi.
Am 30.01.2019 um 11:53 schrieb Marco Corte:
> Il 2019-01-30 11:40 Luke Seelenbinder ha scritto:
>
>
>> Are you on 1.9.x? 1.8.x does not support reuse of backend connections
>> when using an h2 frontend. 1.9.x does support this and it works quite
>> nicely.
>
> Yes! I am on version 1.8.17.
>
t; —
> Luke Seelenbinder
> Stadia Maps | Founder
> stadiamaps.com
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 12:02 PM, Aleksandar Lazic
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>
>> Am 30.01.2019 um 11:53 schrieb Marco Corte:
>>
>
>
Hi.
Am 30.01.2019 um 13:08 schrieb Erlangga Pradipta Suryanto:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use haproxy to proxy rtmp stream to an nginx rtmp backend.
> what we want to achieve is, we will add more nginx rtmp servers on the
> backend, and when we do we want to reload the haproxy config without closin
Hi.
Am 31.01.2019 um 10:29 schrieb Veiko Kukk:
> HAproxy 1.9.3, but happens also with 1.7.10, 1.7.11.
>
> Connections are getting closed during data transfer phase at random sizes on
> backend. Sometimes just as little as 420 bytes get transferred, but usually
> more is transferred before sudde
ential and/or privileged information. If you are not the named
> addressee or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately. The unauthorised disclosure, use or reproduction of this email's
> content is prohibited. Unless expressly agreed, no reliance on
Hi.
Do you have any errors in lighthttpds log?
Regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Veiko Kukk
Gesendet: 1. Februar 2019 12:33:39 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: Re: Early connection close, incomplete transfers
On 2019-01-31 12:57
Hi.
attached a doc update for the new features of HAProxy 1.9.
I hope the patch full fills the CONTRIBUTING rules as
I haven't send patched to the list for long time ;-)
Regards
AleksFrom c0e025e81b87a23f679aff80bddc02a96c4d43b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksandar Lazic
Date: Sat,
Sorry have forgotten to add.
Need to backport to 1.9
Regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Aleksandar Lazic
Gesendet: 2. Februar 2019 10:01:26 MEZ
An: haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: [PATCH] DOC: Add HTX part in the documentation
Hi.
attached a doc update for the new
Hi.
I have just opened a new Issue about DoH for resolving.
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/33
As I know that this is a major change in the Infrastructure I would like to
here what you think about this suggestion.
My opinion was at the beginning against this change as there was only
Hi Lukas.
Am 04.02.2019 um 21:39 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 12:14, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have just opened a new Issue about DoH for resolving.
>>
>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/33
>&
Hi Federico.
Am 06.02.2019 um 15:33 schrieb Federico Iezzi:
> Hey there,
>
> Maybe this is gonna be a very simple answer.
> In HAProxy 1.5.18 seems that the defaults maxconn have a global influence and
> not per backend one.
>
> In my case I have global maxconn at 5120001, while defaults at 256
Hi willy.
Am 06.02.2019 um 15:25 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.4 was released on 2019/02/06. It added 65 new commits
> after version 1.9.3.
Images are updated.
https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy-19-boringssl
https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy19
Maybe this patch
Hi James.
Am 06.02.2019 um 16:16 schrieb James Root:
> Hi All,
>
> I am doing some research and have not really found a great way to configure
> HAProxy to get the desired results. The problem I face is that I a service
> backed by two separate collections of servers. I would like to split traffi
Am 06.02.2019 um 17:19 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Maybe this patch was to late for 1.9.4 please can you consider to add it
>> to 2.0 and later 1.9.5, thanks.
>>
>> https://www.mail
Hi Christopher.
Am 07-02-2019 22:09, schrieb Christopher Faulet:
Hi,
This patch adds a new component in contrib. It is a Prometheus
exporter for HAProxy.
[snipp]
More details in the README.
I'm not especially a Prometheus expert. And I must admit I never use
it. So if anyone have comments
Hi.
I have seen this in some twitter posts and asked me if it's something useable
for a Loadbalancer like HAProxy ?
https://www.dpdk.org/
To be honest it looks like a virtual NIC, but I'm not sure.
Regards
Aleks
Am 10.02.2019 um 12:06 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 10:48, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have seen this in some twitter posts and asked me if it's something
>> useable for a Loadbalancer like HAProxy ?
>>
>> https:
Am 11.02.2019 um 10:40 schrieb Christopher Faulet:
> Le 09/02/2019 à 10:47, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
>> Hi Christopher.
>>
>> Am 07-02-2019 22:09, schrieb Christopher Faulet:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new component in contrib. It is a P
Hi all.
Wow so much feedback, thanks all for the answers ;-)
Am 12.02.2019 um 15:23 schrieb Alexandre Cassen:
> There has been a lot of applications/stack built around DPDK last few years.
> Mostly because people found it easy to code stuff around DPDK and are so happy
> to display perf graph abo
Hi.
Am 12.02.2019 um 18:36 schrieb Mildis:
> Hi list,
>
> haproxy is segfaulting multiple times these days for no apparent reason.
> At first i thought is was a load issue but even few RPS made it crash.
>
> Symptoms are always the same : segfault of a worker then spawn of a new.
> If load is ve
Hi.
Am 13.02.2019 um 00:21 schrieb Norman Branitsky:
> I have an HAProxy 1.7 server sitting in front of a number of Docker Enterprise
> Manager nodes and Worker nodes.
>
> The Worker nodes don’t appear to have any problem with HAProxy terminating the
> SSL and connecting to them via HTTP.
>
> Th
Am 13.02.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
> Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purposes and am
> running into the following:
Which compiler do you use?
> # make TARGET=osx
> src/proto_http.c:293:1: error: argument to 'section' attribute is not
> valid f
Hi Tim.
Am 13.02.2019 um 17:57 schrieb Tim Duesterhus:
> Willy,
> Aleks,
> List,
>
> this (absolutely non-ready-to-merge) patch adds support for brotli
> compression as suggested in issue #21:
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/21
Cool ;-)
> It is tested on Ubuntu Xenial with libbrotl
Looks like apples llvm is not based on master branch.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16545037
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Frederic Lecaille
Gesendet: 14. Februar 2019 16:13:01 MEZ
An: Patrick Hemmer
CC: Olivier Houchard , Aleksandar Lazic
, haproxy@formilux.org
Am 14.02.2019 um 15:31 schrieb Veiko Kukk:
>
> On 2019-02-01 13:30, Veiko Kukk wrote:
>> On 2019-02-01 12:34, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have any errors in lighthttpds log?
>>
>> Yes, it has error messages about not being enable to write to socke
Am 15.02.2019 um 08:47 schrieb Veiko Kukk:
> On 2019-02-14 18:29, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>> Replaced HAproxy with Nginx for testing and with Nginx, not a single
>>> connection
>>> was interrupted, did millions of requests.
>>
>> In 1.9.4 are a lot
Hi Joao.
Am 15.02.2019 um 10:21 schrieb Joao Morais:
>
> Hi list, I'm tuning some HAProxy instances in front of a large kubernetes
> cluster. The config has about 500 hostnames (a la apache/nginx virtual
> hosts), 3 frontends, 1500 backends and 4000 servers. The first frontend is on
> tcp mode bi
Hi Joao.
Am 15.02.2019 um 11:15 schrieb Joao Morais:
>
>
>> Em 15 de fev de 2019, à(s) 07:44, Aleksandar Lazic
>> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi Joao.
>>
>> Am 15.02.2019 um 10:21 schrieb Joao Morais:
>>>
>>> Hi list, I'm tuning some
Am 15.02.2019 um 22:11 schrieb Joao Morais:
>
>> Em 15 de fev de 2019, à(s) 08:43, Aleksandar Lazic
>> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi Joao.
>>
>> Am 15.02.2019 um 11:15 schrieb Joao Morais:
>>>
>>> Hi Aleks, sure. Regarding the config, it has
Hi.
I would like to run haproxy in front of the https://github.com/coturn/coturn
turnserver for nextcloud talk.
Have anyone tried this or have setup-ed successfully such a config?
I would like to disable the udp part on coturn `no-udp` just because for now
have haproxy not the option to proxy ud
he runtime API for the time being.
Sounds like a solution.
> Thanks,
>
> *Erlangga Pradipta Suryanto*
Regards
Aleks
> __
>
> *T. *+62118898168| *BBM PIN. D8F39521*__
>
> *E. esuryanto*@bbmtek.com <mailto:mtal...@bbmtek.com>
>
>
>
>
> On Th
Hi Patrick.
Am 26.02.2019 um 20:13 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
> Now that we have h2 support on frontends, backends, trailers, etc, I'm hoping
> that server side server-push is somewhere on the roadmap. By "server side" I
> mean not this middleware based server-push methodology frequently used where a
Hi.
Am 05.03.2019 um 13:47 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi all,
>
> back to this old thread :
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:36:22PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> I don't know if wurfl builds at all by the way since the last update to
>> the module is its introduction more than 2 years ago.
>
> So
Hi.
In addition to Bruno's answer there was a thread on the ML which explains why
such a "simple" directive like include isn't easy to implement.
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg05215.html
As I also think that in some setups can a include can make the main config
shorter i
Hi.
Please can you try to use 1.9.5 and see if still happen.
Best regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: "Максим Куприянов"
Gesendet: 24. März 2019 16:59:59 MEZ
An: HAProxy
Betreff: segfault in eb32sc_lookup_ge (1.9.4)
Hi!
I caught 2 segfaults on different machines. Bo
Hi.
Am 29.03.2019 um 09:34 schrieb Matous Jan Fialka:
> Hello,
>
> please consider adding range iterator item variable (say `rng.iteritem`) for
> the `server-template` directive so that it can be expanded in the
> `:`
> part of the statement or anywhere else where applicable (see in the example
Am 29.03.2019 um 11:50 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.6 was released on 2019/03/29. It added 34 new commits
> after version 1.9.5.
>
> As mentioned in the 2.0-dev2 release, we've addressed quite a number
> of issues recently and these fixes have now been backported into this
> relea
Am 29.03.2019 um 14:25 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:09:28PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> With openssl are 2 tests failed but I'm not sure because of the setup or a
>> bug.
>> https://gitlab.com/aleks001/haproxy19-centos
Hi Matthias.
Am 31.03.2019 um 10:11 schrieb Matthias Fechner:
> Dear all,
>
> as HTTP2 is getting stable in haproxy 1.9.6 I decided to give it a try.
> Currently I have the following setup:
> frontend www-https
> mode tcp
> option tcplog
> b
Am 01.04.2019 um 09:06 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:04:06AM +0800, ??? wrote:
>> Many thanks Willy, I will wait and to try and study your patch.
>
> You're welcome.
[good infos snipped]
> I managed to build this version with openssl 1.0.2 support on a very
> old Power3/333
Am 01.04.2019 um 15:15 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:04:24PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>> I managed to build this version with openssl 1.0.2 support on a very
>>> old Power3/333 MHz running AIX 5.1 and to run an H2 test. This sounds
>>> a
Hi.
In the last curlup
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2019/04/01/curl-up-2019-is-over/
was a some interesting talks like QUIC: the details
https://youtu.be/mDc2kHPtavE
The slide link is on curlup or on youtube.
Regards
Aleks
Hi Manu.
Am 05.04.2019 um 12:36 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> Thanks you to have integrate BoringSSL!
>
>> Le 29 mars 2019 à 14:51, Aleksandar Lazic > <mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>> a écrit :
>>
>> Am 29.03.2019 um 14:25 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Am 09.04.2019 um 18:06 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
>
>> Le 9 avr. 2019 à 09:58, Aleksandar Lazic > <mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Manu.
>>
>> Am 05.04.2019 um 12:36 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
>>> Hi Aleks,
>>>
>>&g
Hi.
Am 15.04.2019 um 17:19 schrieb bhanu chandra suman:
> Hi Team,
>
> I installed haproxy in ubuntu machine. and after that i edited the
> haproxy.cfg file.
Please can you tell us more about this.
haproxy -vv
uname -a
> bind *:18083
> mode http
> default_backend backendnodes
> backend backen
Hi.
Please keep the Mailinglist in the loop.
Am 15.04.2019 um 17:27 schrieb bhanu chandra suman:
> image.png
It's not easy to copy text from Screenshot's so please copy text into the mail.
Please use 2 v.
haproxy -vv
Thanks.
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:53 PM Aleksandar L
nto this blog post which describes how to add TLS/SSL
termination into haproxy.
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/how-to-get-ssl-with-haproxy-getting-rid-of-stunnel-stud-nginx-or-pound/
Regards
Aleks
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:58 PM Aleksandar Lazic <mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>> wrote:
>
cate?
Maybe this post helps you to create certificates.
https://serversforhackers.com/c/using-ssl-certificates-with-haproxy
Regards
Aleks
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:27 PM Aleksandar Lazic <mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Am 15.04.2019
Am 25.04.2019 um 23:18 schrieb Christopher Faulet:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.7 was released on 2019/04/25. It added 100 new commits after
> version
> 1.9.6.
>
> After a month since the last release, a huge number of bugs were addressed
> into
> this release. The most significant are fixes of 100% C
Hi Christopher.
Am 26.04.2019 um 10:40 schrieb Christopher Faulet:
> Le 26/04/2019 à 10:29, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
>>
>> THe new images are also available on docker hub.
>>
>> https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy19
>> https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digita
Hi.
I have now created some HAProxy 2.0 images ;-).
The outputs below raises some questions to me.
* Should in the OPTIONS output also be the EXTRA_OBJS ?
* Should PCRE2 be used instead of PCRE ?
* Should PRIVATE_CACHE be used in the default build?
* Should SLZ be used in the default build?
* M
Hi.
Any answer to the questions below?
Regards
Aleks
Sat Apr 27 12:47:17 GMT+02:00 2019 Aleksandar Lazic :
> Hi.
>
>
> I have now created some HAProxy 2.0 images ;-).
>
> The outputs below raises some questions to me.
>
> * Should in the OPTIONS output also be the
Hi.
Wed May 15 05:07:05 GMT+02:00 2019 Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 08:57:55PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> > Okay, I did a sweep through the configuration parser and:
> >
> > 1. Made deprecated directives fatal and removed them from the docs. The
> > error mess
Am 15.05.2019 um 17:09 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Willy,
>
> Am 15.05.19 um 11:31 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
2. 'req*' and 'rsp*'. I remember that they allow some modification that
cannot easily be replicated otherwise (but I'll have to check that
first).
>>>
>>> Sure but practicall
Am 13.05.2019 um 16:57 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.8 was released on 2019/05/13. It added 53 new commits
> after version 1.9.7.
>
> The most important bugs fall into 3 main categories here :
> - a possible crash in multi-threads when issuing "show map" or
> "show acl" on th
Am 15.05.2019 um 18:52 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.0-dev3 was released on 2019/05/15. It added 393 new commits
> after version 2.0-dev2.
>
> This is another huge version, having been distacted by a number of bugs
> lately, this one was postponed a bit too much in my taste. As usual
Tim,
Am 16.05.2019 um 00:32 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Aleks,
>
> Am 15.05.19 um 22:59 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
>> As we use more and more the CI features of github what's the opinion of the
>> community to use this features to create and push Container images to the
Am 16.05.2019 um 11:16 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:09:08PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>> The obvious `http-request set-path %[path,regsub(...)]` as suggested in
>>> the docs for `http-request set-query` does *NOT* wo
Am 16.05.2019 um 16:37 schrieb Joao Morais:
>
> Hi list! The symptom is as follow: when logging Host: header I receive
> `myapp.io` while in the same request the sni extension says `anotherapp.com`.
>
> This happens in a very few requests (about 0.5%) but this is enough to make
> some noise - r
Hi.
I use the following lines:
use_backend xmppc2s-backend if { req.ssl_sni -i domain.im }
use_backend cloud-hop-backend if { ssl_fc_sni -i cloud.domain.at }
and asked myself which one is the recommended line?
Makes this lines sense?
tcp-request content accept if { ssl_fc_sni 1 }
Tim,
Am 16.05.2019 um 20:19 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Aleks,
>
> Am 16.05.19 um 01:04 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
>>> As a avid Docker user: I tend to absolutely avoid any Docker images that
>>> are not built using Docker Hub's autobuilder, because I cannot veri
Am 16.05.2019 um 10:00 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
>
> чт, 16 мая 2019 г. в 02:02, Aleksandar Lazic <mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>>:
>
> Am 15.05.2019 um 18:52 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Hi,
> >
[snipp]
> > I'd like to emit a new -dev relea
Am 16.05.2019 um 20:30 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Aleks,
>
> Am 16.05.19 um 18:36 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
>> I will only accept requests which have sni and only when they are client
>> requests.
>
> Consider using strict-sni then:
> https://cbonte.github.io/haprox
Hi.
Looks like my last mail was not passed to the list.
Am 16.05.2019 um 22:27 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> Hello!
>
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 18:37, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I use the following lines:
>>
>> use_backen
Am 17.05.2019 um 20:51 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 16:42, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> After some reading and testing I have created that config file.
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/git001/73d1b7bcc3813ba40028c887e4f3e7f6
>>
>
Hi.
Fri May 17 21:31:41 GMT+02:00 2019 Lukas Tribus :
> Hello,
>
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 21:10, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > > Ok, that's correct, except for the use of ssl_fc_has_sni, which I'd
> > > advise to not use.
> > > Instead,
Am 17.05.2019 um 22:19 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 21:44, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> > Here you need to use req.ssl_sni as you don't terminate SSL in that
>> > frontend, and need to look at SNI to be able to route it
>> > appropriately.
Hi.
I tried today this settings and miss some values in the log.
```
frontend https-in
option httplog clf
option http-use-htx
...
```
:::Client - - [18/May/2019:17:27:56 +] "GET
/ocs/v2.php/apps/notifications/api/v2/notifications HTTP/2.0" 200 691 "" ""
51818 485 "https-in~" "nextclo
Hi.
I have the following setup
```
frontend public_ssl
bind :::443 v4v6
option tcplog
tcp-request inspect-delay 5s
tcp-request content capture req.ssl_sni len 25
tcp-request content accept if { req.ssl_hello_type 1 }
# https://www.haproxy.com/blog/introduction-
Hi.
Am 20.05.2019 um 17:04 schrieb Mortada, Mahmoud:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using haproxy version 1.5.18 with Atlassian Jira data center.
>
> [root@ies-esd-jiradc-loadb-stage haproxy]# haproxy -version
>
> HA-Proxy version 1.5.18 2016/05/10
>
> Copyright 2000-2016 Willy Tarreau
>
> Please find b
30m
>
> server ies-esd-jiradc-node1-stage.ies.mentorg.com 10.249.2.152:8080 check
> cookie ies-esd-jiradc-node1-stage.ies.mentorg.com
>
> # The following "backup" servers are just here to show the startup page
> when
> all nodes are starting up
>
>
returned by jira.
> Regards,
>
> Mahmoud Mortada
Regards
Aleks
> -Original Message-
> From: Mortada, Mahmoud
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 11:11 AM
> To: 'Aleksandar Lazic'
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: RE: haproxy configuration issue
>
>
You need to add `accept-proxy` keyword in receiving haproxy bind line.
https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.9/configuration.html#5.1-accept-proxy
Hth
Aleks
Wed May 22 14:03:26 GMT+02:00 2019 praveen kumar :
>
> have a haproxy setup as follow:
>
> Client --> Haproxy (LOCATION A)--> HAP
ge.ies.mentorg.com' was defined without an explicit
> ID at line
You need to change the names in the server line.
> Is this what you want me to do ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Mahmoud Mortada
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Aleksandar Lazi
Hi Eduardo.
That's a pretty interesting question, at least for me.
First why do you restart all haproxies at the same time and don't use rolling
updates ?
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tutorials/kubernetes-basics/update/update-intro/
Maybe you can add a init container to update the peers in the
Hi.
Wed May 22 23:41:13 GMT+02:00 2019 Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:29:53AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > if we do not like using github PR and Willy receives 2k emails a day...
> > do we consider using something like that
> > https://patchwor
Hi.
We had a interesting discussion on Kubeconf how a session table in peer's can
survive a restart of a haproxy instance.
We came to a request for enhancement (RFE) to be able to add a peer server, not
a peer section, to a existing peers section, similar to add server for backend.
Opinions?
uot;* how many entries are in the tables?"
> I don't know exactly, maybe between thousand and ten thousand.
>
> Thanks!
> Att, Eduardo
>
>
>
> Em qua, 22 de mai de 2019 às 16:10, Aleksandar Lazic < al-hapr...@none.at []
> > escreveu:
>
>&
Hi Willy.
Am 23.05.2019 um 16:48 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> We had a interesting discussion on Kubeconf how a session table in peer's can
>> survive a restart of a haproxy instance.
>
Hi.
Fri May 24 15:00:55 GMT+02:00 2019 Patrick Hemmer :
> Is there a way to capture (and log) headers from http/2 response
> trailers? The documentation doesn't mention trailers, and when I try to
> reference headers which are present in the trailers (e.g.
> "res.fhdr(grpc-status)"), it does
bq %CC %CS %hrl %hsl"
>
> The empty fields are expected if you haven't configured http request and
> response header captures. Therefore, %hrl and %hsl are empty.
Cool thanks.
> Best regards,
>
> Bruno
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Saturday,
Am 24.05.2019 um 16:30 schrieb Moemen MHEDHBI:
>
> On 19/05/2019 00:28, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have the following setup
[snipp]
>> What variable can I use for the log to see which protocol is used for the
>> backend, as with htx the fronten
Hi.
attached a patch for the doc to make it clear that for clf are request header
capture required.
Regards
aleks
From 897bd17130c7051300ca5bd5569ac47c86da2488 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aleks
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 12:11:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] DOC: Add informations for httplog clf mode
Am 26.05.2019 um 21:39 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 02:59:09PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> attached a patch for the doc to make it clear that for clf are request header
>> capture required.
>
> I'm so
Hi.
Am 27.05.2019 um 20:52 schrieb Frank Myhr:
> Hi,
>
> I have a setup with multiple domains that resolve to a single public IP
> address,
> with https handled by haproxy using SNI feeding an apache http backend using
> name-base virtual hosting. Access to some (but not all) of the virtual host
FYI.
Is anyone here involved in this initiative ?
Would be interesting how the routing will work based on ESNI.
Best regards
Aleks
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Fwd: ESNI initiative
Datum: Wed, 29 May 2019 22:36:55 +0100
Von:Niall O'Reilly via curl-library
An
Hi.
cipriancraciun, nutinshell and I discussed in the issue above some Socks use
cases.
Let me summarize the thread here.
cipriancraciun suggest to handle socks similar to proxy protocol.
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/82#issuecomment-498004333
I don't think that socks could be hand
Am 02.06.2019 um 13:00 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.0-dev5 was released on 2019/06/02. It added 92 new commits
> after version 2.0-dev4.
>
> This version addresses a small number of no-to-trivial issues met while
> working on fixing other bugs and during benchmarks.
>
> One such is
Hi Willy.
Mon Jun 03 14:05:07 GMT+02:00 2019 Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 01:42:45PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > Is this test usefull in docker setup?
> >
> > ## Starting vtest #
Am 11.06.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.0-dev7 was released on 2019/06/11. It added 34 new commits
> after version 2.0-dev6.
[snipp]
> Please find the usual URLs below :
>Site index : http://www.haproxy.org/
>Discourse: http://discourse.haproxy.org
Am 11.06.2019 um 22:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Sorry to say that but there is no dev7 and in
>> http://www.haproxy.org/download/2.0/src/devel/
>> also not.
>
> Ah silly me! And who forgot to run "
Am 13.06.2019 um 13:47 schrieb Akom II:
> Hello,
> Ubuntu 18.04 and haproxy 1.9.8 with latest patch on 2019/06/08
> I'm currently encounter haproxy consume all CPU core, at the begging I
> curious might relate to peers function which is our app rely heavily on
> those ,
> it happen quite f
Am 16.06.2019 um 21:56 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.0.0 was released on 2019/06/16. It added 63 new commits
> after version 2.0-dev7.
[snipp]
> Please find the usual URLs below :
>Site index : http://www.haproxy.org/
>Discourse: http://discourse.haproxy.org/
>
Hi,
as this cookie bug prevent some user to use the shiny new haproxy 2 is there
any plan to release a bugfix version soon?
Regards
Aleks
Hi Christopher.
Thanks for answer.
Regards
Aleks
Mon Jun 24 15:29:58 GMT+02:00 2019 Christopher Faulet :
> Le 24/06/2019 à 14:46, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > as this cookie bug prevent some user to use the shiny new haproxy 2 is
> > there any
&
501 - 600 of 1095 matches
Mail list logo
