Ed,
Does IBM have a similar support phone number to use (in Germany?) I
guess I would just inundate the support line with sev 1 issues
When I called in early Monday morning our time, a minute after they opened, I
was told that there is already a sev1. They don't take another one, and I have
no
NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
Hi All
We have been tasked by management to do a Siebel DB2 workload conversion
exercise from an IBM Z-Series to P-Series (P6) and I would appreciate
any
Eric Bielefeld writes:
I really think one of the biggest reasons for not
running web applications on the mainframe is the high
software costs.
Leaving aside the critical facts that the software world has changed, that
software full costs, and that no IT activity is free (in a full cost
sense),
Oh, and Firefox doesn't work any better here than IE
Interesting. I'm in Russia and it works fine.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/07/2007
at 10:02 AM, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is simply not true!!
Want to bet?
The two AMODE bits (BA EA) are in the PSW, not in address words.
There are specific instructions that interpret bit 0 of the 32-bit[1]
branch address as AMODE31. See
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/07/2007
at 12:38 PM, Eric Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Isn't that what they said when MVS first came out?
I don't know what they said, but certainly I never said that 2 GiB was
near infinite.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/06/2007
at 02:12 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
However I don't understand the reason why any bit in any 24-bit address
could mess someting in 64-bit addressing mode.
What you don't understand is that typically a 24-bit address is not used
by just 24-bit code.
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 18:13 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Jim's idea seems very smart to me
Jim was preaching to the congregation ...
(Whitespace is free.)
For the majority (all ???) of the customers I deal with, whitespace is
an opportunity to screw down the cap, and save bucks.
The
Wow, the 3270 interface is still available?
the 3270 interface is working just fine and happy, and yes, you can actually
update your pmrs today via the 3270 interface.
web ibmlink interface however, is continually broken as designed. Did IBM hire
bill gates to implement their web ibmlink
Kelman, Tom wrote:
Ed, actually I think this is just someone who decided he'd enjoy
selling waffles a lot more than the day-to-day grind if IT, and it
appears he's doing great at it.
From: Ken Porowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe someone on the list can go buy a waffle and ask
Hi,
Since last 2 days I am pissed of this 3590 tape drive issue.
D U,,,680,1
IEE457I 12.18.00 UNIT STATUS 244
UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE
0691 359S F-BOX/REMOV
D M=DEV(680)
IEE174I 12.20.01 DISPLAY M 286
DEVICE 0680 STATUS=DEVICE IS BOXED: RESIDUAL DATA
I'm biased as well, but it works great for me. Now, if only the
HTTPServer work went on a specialty processor... and all the TCP/IP
work :)
Aaron
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:43:34 +1000, Shane ibm-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 18:13 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Jim's
Jacky Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
Since last 2 days I am pissed of this 3590 tape drive issue.
D U,,,680,1
IEE457I 12.18.00 UNIT STATUS 244
UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE
0691 359S F-BOX/REMOV
D
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:43:34 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(Whitespace is free.)
For the majority (all ???) of the customers I deal with, whitespace is
an opportunity to screw down the cap, and save bucks.
The (second ???) age of the dinosaurs is coming to an end for all but the
At least there is an easy to find indication on the page that there is
an issue. I always viewed other outages with a certain disdain due to
the fact that they had the ability to put something on the webpage to
indicate that there is an issue but would not place an indicator on any
of the pages.
daver++ wrote:
Kelman, Tom wrote:
Ed, actually I think this is just someone who decided he'd enjoy
selling waffles a lot more than the day-to-day grind if IT, and it
appears he's doing great at it.
From: Ken Porowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe someone on the list can go buy a
Thank you all very much on this, we are looking into this to see what we
can do.
Aldridge Murrell
-Original Message-
From: Russell Witt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:04 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Cc: Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
You ought to re-read the description of the LPA SDATA option. That
indicates to put into the dump things in LPA that are known to be loaded
(represented in contents supervsion LLEs) in the address space(s) being
dumped.
If you want to dump LPA, then you must specify an address range that spans
I worked on the tn3270 ssl using Top Secret to store the private key and
certificate. Works just fine and was pretty easy.
1) gencert tcpip
2) genreq tcpip
3) ftp request to desktop, e-mail info security
4) info security performed the versign portion
5) ftp cert to mainframe
6) add CA cert to
We had someone else (from another company) close a crash-related PMR.
We have another PMR open for that.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 11:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Jason,
We are planning to implement SMS data compression. I've read that we
cannot implement compression on VSAM file that is open for update. Is
this true? Aside from this, any other considerations?
Compression will not take place until you recreate the vsam dataset. The
danger with updating
It was typo error .. Devices are not managed ..Device is 891.
I tried all commands ...
I am not getting CHP PHYSICALLY ONLINE for 891. I am fed of this problem
...I can not think of IPL at this stage ..
D M=DEV(890)
IEE174I 13.07.26 DISPLAY M 329
DEVICE 0890 STATUS=ONLINE
CHP
btw, does he earn more from wafel than what he was earning from his IT job?
I did not ask him that, but according to the originally linked news
story, he does not. His business is still young, however. I believe he
has been active for only about a month.
Tom Chris,
Haven't looked at the thread for some time... a bit late now...
What I meant was this...
The bit signaling the line is x'8000' which is the only reason why
x' 8000' - x' 0001' is not addressable. IBM
decided that using the Highest bit to do this
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
[ snip ]
You can use any version of z/OS (and even some versions of
OS/390) to host a webserver without paying for WebSphere or
whatever the BEA product is called. I've been harping on that
for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gray, Larry - Larry A
I haven't had any problems getting in today. It is somewhat
odd to select revise and look at someone elses or some other
companies ETR.
Not to mention the possibility of being charged with
I think there was a problem with your URL for the find books site.
Try this one instead
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/find_books.html
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Follow your dreams.
29 years ago, an industrial psychologist knocked me out an IT job with,
you're not cut out for programming.
28 years later, I've proven him right, over and over, but I'm still having
fun.
On 11/14/07, legolas wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
daver++ wrote:
Kelman, Tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Roger Bolan
Ok. Just a thought. I am not responsible in any way for
IBMLINK. I don't even have access from the outside the way
you do to test this idea.
I am not telling you to do this. Try it at your own
its not how much you make , its how much you keep
daver++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 14, 2007, at 7:06 AM, Schramm, Rob wrote:
At least there is an easy to find indication on the page that there is
an issue. I always viewed other outages with a certain disdain due to
the fact that they had the ability to put something on the webpage to
indicate that there is an issue
btw, does he earn more from wafel than what he was earning from his
IT
job?
I did not ask him that, but according to the originally linked news
story, he does not. His business is still young, however. I believe he
has been active for only about a month.
I believe the article said he
We only recenctly started using WLM managed initiators, and I would like
to know what happens when the operators change the service class for
those jobs. We have service classes that can be used if critical work
needs to get a boost; do I need separate ones for the WLM managed
initiators?
On Nov 14, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gray, Larry -
Larry A
I haven't had any problems getting in today. It is somewhat
odd to select revise and look at someone elses or some other
companies ETR.
Not to
We have had this issue also. The only cure we have found so far is to
IML the controller. The IML was done during a quite period and did not
cause any other problems.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
On Nov 14, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Jacky Bright wrote:
It was typo error .. Devices are not managed ..Device is 891.
I tried all commands ...
I am not getting CHP PHYSICALLY ONLINE for 891. I am fed of this
problem
...I can not think of IPL at this stage ..
Try IBMLINK oops that isn't
I don't think the mind-meld is working.. name is Rob.. sort of sounds
like John.. if you say it real fast.
VBG
Rob Schramm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 9:17 AM
To:
So any chance on a refund from IBM, seeing that we're paying top dollars for
something that hasn't been working for the past 4-5 days?
Ron
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
now I would vote on that..maybe if ya put money issue in front of this
it may get a response .. my alternative to asking q a is here and
other's I subscribe to...can not and have not depended on ibmlink in (2)
years ...
Maybe we should pass this on to IBM:
Dear Reader,
You're invited to attend this live Webcast. It's TOMORROW! Register now.
Test, Analyze Understand Your Embedded and Real-Time Applications
Date:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Bolan
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLink's unavailability
Ok. Just a thought. I am not responsible in any way for IBMLINK. I
don't
You should have two sets of service classes, onde for WLM managed and
other for JES
INITS. Since sometimes there is a delay in starting WLM inits, this
delay is considered
when WLM does its measures.
But since the job has started, you can use any service class with RESET
command.
The basic difference is that WLM takes the inputqueue time for WLM managed
classes into its considerations and it does not for JES2 classes. Mixing those
classes in one Service Class will mess up WLM's calculations.
Kees.
Steven Werth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL
In a message dated 11/14/2007 7:45:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My thinking,
right or wrong was that if they used the lowest bit to do the signaling,
they would have lost addressability to less.
The lowest bit was assigned a meaning in the mid-1960s, namely an
Thanks for your response. We do, of course, have a separate service class
defined for the WLM inits. I am curious as to what decisions WLM makes
regarding those inits when one or more jobs are reset.
I'm in the process of reviewing our service policy and we have way too many
service classes
Bill,
You are probably right... the amount wasted is minimal in the 64bit
scheme...
Regards
Herbie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
Sent: 14 November 2007 03:14 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Flash on IBMLink:
ServiceLink ETR Problem
14 November 2007
We are experiencing a problem with the ServiceLink ETR application. As a
result, we have had to temporarily disable the Assign, Revise, and Complete
functions. However during this restriction you will be able to view your
records from the
You have hit on a sore point with me. I'm still not sure why we have to
pay extra for IBMLink in the first place.
Jon
snip
So any chance on a refund from IBM, seeing that we're paying top dollars
for
something that hasn't been working for the past 4-5 days?
/snip
http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH1
0621
Abstract: Identified problem in TCP/IP on z/OS 1.8 which could lead to
degraded performance for remote access to DB2 or other application
on z/OS using the TCP network protocol. Problem is that additional
acknowledgements
You are probably right... the amount wasted is minimal in the 64bit scheme...
I remember when HIPERSPACEs first came out.
I had a 2GB space, but everybody complained about the lowest page (4K - PSA)
being unavailable.
Same issue.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Maybe next time there is a SHARE or MVS EXPO in NYC we should have him
supply goodies for SCIDS or the vendor area. Unless he wants to stay as
far away from IT as he can.
-Original Message-
daver++
Well, I didn't ask that one. I think that it is safe to say that he is
not ready for that
When a device is boxed, you should first have a ce take a look at it and
make sure there are no hardware errors. Bringing it online if there is a
hardware error can cause other problems. He should be able to clear it if
there are no other problems.
Bill
From: Jacky Bright [EMAIL
Ted said:
I had a 2GB space, but everybody complained about the lowest page (4K -
PSA) being unavailable.
I believe that was a 3090E vs 3090S thing. And I thought it was DATAspaces
that had that problem. The S corrected the problem.,
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
Performance Consultant
IBM
On 11/9/07, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the zfasdmin command. It can dynamically add secondary and/or
extend to a second volume.
I'm trying to grow a zfs file aggregate with the following command -
zfsadm grow -aggregate zfs.was510.comfig.zfs -size 30
and getting the
On 13 Nov 2007 10:33:54 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Berg) wrote:
How many copy members have you created designed for the REPLACING
option?
None. (The new COPY's must be backwards compatible with old programs.)
Old programs don't use new COPY statements unless they are modified to
do so.
On 11/14/07, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the bpxmtext function says the EF17623E means: aggregate not
found. Is the zFS filesystem mounted? I think that it must be.
Sorry, I had a typo in the last attempt at the command. The previous
attempts with the correct name return the
There are no Hardware errors. When I issue the V 891,online,uncond I am
getting
V 891,ONLINE,UNCOND
IOS444I DYNAMIC PATHING NOT OPERATIONAL ON DEVICE 0891
IEE103I UNIT 0891 NOT BROUGHT ONLINE 771
IEE763I NAME= IOSCCMSG CODE= 0030
IOS291I CONFIGURATION DATA COULD NOT BE READ ON
Thomas Berg wrote:
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Howard Brazee
Skickat: den 14 november 2007 17:34
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
On 13 Nov 2007 10:33:54 -0800, [EMAIL
We have seen an ongoing problem (through 1.7) where C programs cannot
reliably read compressed files. The programs apparently perceive an end
of file before the data ends.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason To
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: copy zfs dataset
On 11/9/07, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at the
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Howard Brazee
Skickat: den 14 november 2007 17:34
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
On 13 Nov 2007 10:33:54 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas
(IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
In a message dated 11/14/2007 7:45:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My thinking,
right or wrong was that if they used the lowest bit to do the signaling,
they would have lost addressability to less.
That's
IBM and Illinois State University Collaborate to Equip Students With
21st Century Computing Skills
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071114/0328578.html
Loaning them a z890, no mention of z/OS, only Linux
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Jacky,
After the tape drive went offline, did it have to be repaired?
You might want to try the following:
- Vary offline the remaining tape drives on this controller, 890 - 893, I
presume.
- Reboot the control unit that these tape drives are attached to
- Wait about 3 - 5 minutes for the
Or a V 891,offline,f
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: 14 November 2007 05:23 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3590 TAPE Drive F-BOX status
In a message dated 11/14/2007 6:22:44 A.M. Central Standard
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Thompson, Steve wrote:
---SNIP-
You are absolutely right. Wish I'd thought of it.
Next time we can't get CICS/TS to run correctly, we'll just do a bunch
of DELPAGEs and VARY off of the SPOOL Volumes and then re-run the
whole
z/OS
On 14 Nov 2007 08:42:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Berg)
wrote:
Old programs don't use new COPY statements unless they are modified to
do so.
But future programs will.
Old programs that are recompiled get the new copys/versions.
And fails in compilation if they contains the :tag:
Herbie,
That may be another possibility.
However, the clunkers I worked with in the past seemed to require a
different touch. If I had a tape drive go offline/boxed because of a
hardware error in the drive and the drive had to be repaired, quite
frequently a 'vary online' wouldn't work. Don't ask
Yes, that's the correct URL. IBM fixed it overnight. It's working
again now.
-Original Message-
From: Kelman, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 6:10 AM
To: Lucymarie Ruth
Subject: FW: IBM z-OS book search
Lucymarie,
I thought I'd send this directly to
from ibmlink web site
Voice Support alternative for SoftwareXcel customers
14 November 2007
An emergency process has been instituted for customers with an active
contract for SoftwareXcel basic edition or SoftwareXcel enterprise edition
when IBMLink or an IBMLink function is unavailable.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
from ibmlink web site
Voice Support alternative for SoftwareXcel customers
14 November 2007
An emergency process has been instituted for customers with
an active contract for SoftwareXcel
Hi John,
Thanks for the info and confirmation. From the book, it looks like it
did mentioned about cannot implement compression on dataset open for
update but later realized it was actually for QSAM etc and not VSAM.
We have also already tested to compressed VSAM files that is open for
Ulrich,
The last time I had a boxed one... on a R14... I took all the tape units
offline, took the chpid offline, Varied the chpid online, varied the
units online, and it was OK. I normally don't go near the hardware
inside the Steel casings...
Regards
Herbie
-Original Message-
From:
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Steve Comstock
Skickat: den 14 november 2007 17:47
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
Thomas Berg wrote:
-Ursprungligt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: copy zfs dataset
On 11/14/07, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gray, Larry - Larry A
Some people, based on support contract, are not allowed to
call that number for QA, only for problems. I beleive in
the interim, they are allowed to call for QA.
I believe the same
No Problem.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ulrich Krueger
Sent: 14 November 2007 05:56 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3590 TAPE Drive F-BOX status
Herbie,
That may be another possibility.
However, the clunkers I
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Next thing you know, they'll start shipping microfiche again :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: latest ibmlink news (still not
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Howard Brazee
Skickat: den 14 november 2007 18:35
Till: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
On 14 Nov 2007 08:42:26 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: latest ibmlink news (still not working, shock and surprise)
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Ed Gould wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Thompson, Steve wrote:
You are absolutely right. Wish I'd thought of it.
Next time we can't get CICS/TS to run correctly, we'll just do a bunch
of DELPAGEs and VARY off of the SPOOL Volumes and then re-run the whole
z/OS install, and then IPL. Oh,
I spoke too soon. It worked once, but now it busted again. It is not
now working for anyone at our site. Does it work at anyone's site?
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/find_books.html
-Original Message-
Yes, that's the correct URL. IBM
It's a shame for IBM. Perhaps they should still develop 3270 applications.
Roland
By MS you mean Microsoft?? Who are you kidding? Microsoft's support
sites appear to be highly available. I have *never* personally
experienced an outage when I run Windows Update or when I need to look
something up
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:21:46 -0500 Ken Porowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:IBM and Illinois State University Collaborate to Equip Students With
:21st Century Computing Skills
:http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071114/0328578.html
:Loaning them a z890, no mention of z/OS, only Linux
I wonder why Northern
I am in the habbit of always starting here because I never find that it
is down.
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss
It takes a couple more steps because you need to tell it your country
but then this is why the link address never changes and is seldom down -
it is for
At 01:32 PM 11/14/2007, you wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:21:46 -0500 Ken Porowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:IBM and Illinois State University Collaborate to Equip Students With
:21st Century Computing Skills
:http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071114/0328578.html
:Loaning them a z890, no mention of
I just tried it and was successful. 29 manuals found when searching for
acc* meth*
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucymarie Ruth
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
I
Greetings,
About six months ago, a story appeared in SearchDataCenter concerning
the NYSE migration to UNIX/LINUX platforms. Since it's been six months,
I wrote to the author this morning requesting a follow up. He responded
almost immediately that he'd look into it.
I'll post again when I
It still works for me.
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucymarie Ruth
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
I spoke too
Shouldn't the first question be why do anything at all?
-Original Message-
From: Murrell, Aldridge (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR) [mailto:snip]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEC507d
Thank you all very much on this, we are looking into this to
I have applied maintenance for a processor upgrade. Some of the
maintenance involved updating the OMVS ROOT HFS.
Today, I began the ACCEPT of this maintenance. When I checked the
output from the ACCEPT CHECK, I noticed that the OMVS ROOT HFS file was
not allocated. I found this strange, as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Yuhas
I have applied maintenance for a processor upgrade. Some of
the maintenance involved updating the OMVS ROOT HFS.
Today, I began the ACCEPT of this maintenance. When I
checked the output from the
I just realized I could have examined the CSI to determine the DLIB.
The Alzheimer's must be kicking in.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Thomas Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
..
snip
My initial point when I started this thread was that if
You make an effort to create a functionality, why doing
it badly ?
Thomas
* * *
The answer is that you want COPY/REPLACING to be something that it was
Thomas,
I posted this already, but in case it didn't make it to you (or
others)
There *IS* a method of insuring that old programs will compile cleanly and
that new programs can use partial word replacement with :TAG:. This
method does allow the original owner to still own the COPY
... When I checked the
output from the ACCEPT CHECK, I noticed that the OMVS ROOT HFS file was
not allocated. I found this strange, as there was a number of PTFs that
modified this HFS file.
ACCEPT does not allocate, read, nor update target libraries, and the
directories in the UNIX file
On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
-SNIP
Steve,
If MS gets away with it, IBM will be a close second.
By MS you mean Microsoft?? Who are you kidding? Microsoft's support
sites appear to be highly available. I have *never* personally
experienced an
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
11/08/2007
at 06:23 PM, Thompson, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually, yes. It is address x'00' and was called PSA (but is
actually absolute page 0).
PSA is real address 0; it's absolute address 0 for at most one of the
processors in the complex. Neither real
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
