http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH1
0621
Error attempting to access requested page
2007/11/14, Aaron Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH1
0621
Abstract: Identified problem in TCP/IP on z/OS 1.8 which could
Hello Walter,
Because there is only this device attached on this channel and only the PROD
LPAR needs access.
On the previous channel there are attached 4 devices like printers etc.
I defined the new statement with HCD. What you see is the extract from HCD.
I defined the new channel dedicated, so
- Original Message
From: Paolo Pirillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
old:
PARTITION=((PRODUKT),(ENTWICK,SYSPROG),REC),PCHID=160, *
===
new:
PARTITION=((PRODUKT),(=)),PCHID=16C, *
===
Paolo,
why did you change the PARTITION statement ?
In the second stmt looks like PRODUKT is
Watch the wrap, don't forget 0621 at the end of the URL
Werner
Jorge Arueira Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
16.11.2007 12:22
Bitte antworten an
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
An
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Kopie
Thema
Ted:
Thanks for the reply. On some IBM websites, when you investigate the
migration options, and you are looking at something outside the
supported V1R4 to V1R7 path, you get contact your IBM representative.
Well, although I was a 20-year IBMer, I am inclined to ask the people
who support
Hi All,
We're a shop running z/OS V1R6 and z/OS V1R7, looking into migration to z/OS
V1R9
Migration manuals for z/OS V1R9 say nothing about supported migration paths for
safely
going from z/OS V1R6 to z/OS V1R9 and insuring safe fallback in case backing
out is
required (maybe IBM is only
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:42:47 -0700, Steve Comstock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see it in this article, but someone already posted that
it seems the software is Linux (probably with z/VM), not z/OS;
is z/OS still IBM's flagship operating system?
You know, even though I'm a z/VM guy, I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Magee
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REFM=VB Binary upload problem
Another method would be to use DSS to create an archive and
Does anyone know how HSM determines the order to move eligible datasets
from ML1 to ML2? We have HSM secondary space management set up to run
between (0900 1600) and it usually runs out of time. However when you look
at the MIG logs it seems to process the datasets in alphabetical order eg.
Another method would be to use DSS to create an archive and then terse it
with TRSMAIN. Reverse the process once the tersed file reaches its
destination z/OS system.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I woudl probably verify what I dump to SYSMDUMP. You can do this with a D D,O
command.
You should see something like the following
IEE857I 10.13.16 DUMP OPTION 713
SYSABEND- ADD PARMLIB OPTIONS SDATA=(LSQA,TRT,CB,ENQ,DM,IO,ERR,SUM),
I can calm some of your fears. While I have nothing to do with the Academic
Initiative Program here at ISU, I was the Derry quoted in the article. Have
you ever tried to explain a variable priced computer and incremental software
charges to non-technical newspaper people before. It ain't
Paul,
You didn't mention anything about contacting IBM to give you the default
userid and password. I'm sure they can help you. If you have a z9, IBM's
latest and greatest, I'm sure they will help.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original
Hi
Is there a way to access the SYSTRACE entries in the SYSMDUMP ?
(background : I would like to make a IPCS verbexit program to find out
the the module name etc.
for the TRACE table entries )
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
I TRIED IT OUT AND IT DIDN'T WORK. BELOW IS MESSAGE:
ARC1001I SCCPM1.GBANK.LOG3.FDBS0658.G0001V00 RECOVER FAILED, RC=0028,
ARC1001I (CONT.) REAS=
ARC1128I BACKUP/DUMP COPY DOES NOT EXIST
Thompson, Steve
I'm interested on this case too.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
DFHLS2WS/DFHWS2LS are procs to invoke the batch java programs needed to
create the WSDL from the commarea.
they should be in SDFHINST.
When you run the catalog manager example, the doc will tell you where
everything is and running DFHLS2WS is part of setting it up.
also, check the CICS INTERNET
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM - URGENT HELP
Good Day,
A files which was migrated by DFHSM (MIGRAT2)was
This suggests a related question: when APPLY builds a load
module, the search order for MOD elements puts target libraries
before DLIBs, IIRC. Is this so even if the target library
containing the MOD element is a HFS directory?
Yes.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development
My zfs file systems are *not* SMS managed and I have no issues.
snip
Lucymarie Ruth
No good reason not to, but IBM is making us take a step backward by
making zFS'es VSAM. That means we have to go back to having
SMS-managed, non-esoterically cataloged filesystems. Not good for those
folks who
- Original Message
From: Mark S. House [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I remove the enqueue so I can increase and copy the
file.
Mark,
they only way I know to free others systems' ENQ is
1) P LLA on every system (frees LLA ENQs)
2) SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE on every system (free XCFAS
Hi List,
Anyone out there can share the Incremental backup restore procedure for
HFS/zFS instead of Full Volume Backup ?
One solution here is Tivoli Storage Manager for z/OS (think HSM for the
distributed world) where it runs on the smallest machine (less cost) in the
SYSPLEX and has a small
I'm trying to do a z/OS v1.7 HCD IODF, but I'm coming back with the
following SEV E error:
CBDA268I No Control Unit Information Table found for 9490.
According to STK support there's a USERMOD that I need, but I can't seem
to explain to support that I need 4 object modules to apply the
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:30:48 -0800, Walter Marguccio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
From: Mark S. House [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I remove the enqueue so I can increase and copy the
file.
Mark,
they only way I know to free others systems' ENQ is
1) P LLA on every
In a message dated 11/15/2007 10:38:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The important point, I believe, is that the
Academic Initiative is a marketing program. As
I've told a number of people, the cynic in me
insists on believing that IBM's lack of interest
in NIU
Good Day,
A files which was migrated by DFHSM (MIGRAT2)was uncataloged in error ( del
nscr purge). Is there a way of getting it back?
I tried :
DEFINE CL (NAME(SCCPM1.GBANK.LOG3.FDBS0658.G0001V00) -
VOLUMES(MIGRAT2) -
RECATALOG)
In a message dated 11/16/2007 10:46:35 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hopefully, you are aware that IBM does not control SHARE in any way. It is
a user group, made up of volunteers who are constantly scrambling for other
volunteers to help out. If any faculty from
To expand on the original question, we have a network link between 2 sites
that can't handle the default MTU size as defined on the Ethernet cards on
the HMC console (it's a z9).
We have a few options available to us to resolve this, and, as some have so
helpfully pointed out, one of those is
A couple thoughts. First of all, shut the caps-lock key off. It looks
like you're yelling at us. :-)
Did you try doing the DEFINE NVSAM that John (I believe) tossed out?
At least at our site, before a dataset can get migrated, it must be
backed up via DFHSM backup routines. You could try
Rex,
My apologies for using caps-lock.
I tired the DEFINE NVAS command and I am having a problem with device type:
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 168 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLEH-4
I know it is a high density drive 9840 (STORAGETEK) but it doesn't seem to
work.
Here is
George,
Yes you could define them as 9490, and as you have discovered you will
need to install various modules to install the HCD UIMs, as HCD does not
understand '9490'
However, there is little point in doing this as you can just as easily
define them with Control Unit 3490 and Device Type
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:17:39 -0500, George Rodriguez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to do a z/OS v1.7 HCD IODF, but I'm coming back with the
following SEV E error:
CBDA268I No Control Unit Information Table found for 9490.
According to STK support there's a USERMOD that I need, but I
Do the define without the RECATALOG parameter
DEF NVSAM(name(x) devt(tape) volume(migrat))
snip
A files which was migrated by DFHSM (MIGRAT2)was uncataloged in error
( del nscr purge). Is there a way of getting it back?
I tried :
DEFINE CL (NAME(SCCPM1.GBANK.LOG3.FDBS0658.G0001V00)
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 9:42 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Comstock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
* With the addition, ISU becomes the only public university in
the state to offer its technology students both an undergraduate
program in enterprise computing and hands-on access to
I tried your suggestion for the DEVT. Still same error message:
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 168 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLEH-4
I will keep on digging.
Adams, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue the DEFINE command again but use device type DEVT(X'78048083').
Then try to
You might want to distinguish between using CICS as a web server (check
the CICS TS 3.1 Internet Guide, SC34-6450), and using CICS as a Web
Services provider (check the CICS TS 3.1 Web Services Guide,
SC34-6458). As a web server, CICS can deliver both static web pages and
We have just setup TELNET to run in it's own address space under z/OS 1,7,
does any one have experience with automatically restarting TELNET FTPD
using an automation product. The TCPIP doc says that AUTOLOG will not
check for and restart Generic Servers like TELNET and FTPD. AUTOLOG does
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 1:30 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Wayne Driscoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
I would think that you would be better off having a z/VM LPAR with a number
of guests from which you can IPL z/OS, rather than having a z/OS LPAR for the
OS students to play with.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Derry, James E
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Newspaper: IBM Invests $5M in Illinois State Univ.
I can calm some of your fears. While I have nothing to
do with the
Hunter,
I actually got the same impression from his original post.
Ken, Web Services provides program-to-program communications which can
be (but doesn't have to be) cross platform. So an application on Linux
for System z or Windows (for instance) can call a CICS program. A CICS
program,
Jim,
I would think that you would be better off having a z/VM LPAR with a number of
guests from which you can IPL z/OS, rather than having a z/OS LPAR for the OS
students to play with. This configuration will allow for IPLing z/OS without
requiring access to the HMC (either direct or remote).
Issue the DEFINE command again but use device type DEVT(X'78048083').
Then try to recall the dataset. If it fails look in the HSM Storage
Administration Guide and follow the steps for Case 9 in the Data
Recovery Scenarios Chapter (at least that is the case in the 1.8
manual!). You would look for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM - URGENT HELP
Good Day,
A files which was migrated by DFHSM (MIGRAT2)was uncataloged in error
If you have copies on a local device, you don't have to worry about
problems with the IBM web site or your internet connection. On the
other hand, your local copy may be out of date unless someone manually
copies over the new version. My system is not allowed to connect to the
internet so the
Mark Post wrote:
Hopefully, you are aware that IBM does not control SHARE in any way. It is a
user group, made up of volunteers who are constantly scrambling for other
volunteers to help out. If any faculty from NIU would like to help, I'm very
sure they won't be turned away. The zNextGen
I agree with Roy Hewitt and Mark Zeldon.
Way back when, I was a user of the STK UIMs so that I could gen the 9490s
as device type 9490. But, after some z/OS (or perhaps OS/390, it was some
time ago) change came along, and the STK UIMs didn't work correctly
anymore, I changed to using the
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:50:58 -0800, Schwarz, Barry A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have copies on a local device, you don't have to worry about
problems with the IBM web site or your internet connection. On the
other hand, your local copy may be out of date unless someone manually
copies over
If it was only a couple hours DFHSM shouldn't have had time to clear out
all backups of the dataset. Did you try either RECALL or RECOVER? If
so, what command did you use and what was the output?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi gangs on both lists,
Has anyone reported either of these two documentation errors:
1) ASMA042W is documented as E in the HLASM V1R5 Programmers Guide
2) WTO MF=E TEXT says to always use parentheses, but if the operand is
an RX-label it really should not have parentheses,
I forgot to answer your question about how long ago the dataset was
uncataloged. It was about 2 hours ago.
Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A couple thoughts. First of all,
shut the caps-lock key off. It looks
like you're yelling at us. :-)
Did you try doing the DEFINE NVSAM that
we have CA-autoop's taking care of that as well as shutting them down..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This
Don't RECOVER, RESTORE!
-Original Message-
From: willie bunter [mailto:snip]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 9:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFHSM - URGENT HELP
I TRIED IT OUT AND IT DIDN'T WORK. BELOW IS MESSAGE:
ARC1001I SCCPM1.GBANK.LOG3.FDBS0658.G0001V00 RECOVER
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 5:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: zFS (was Re: good, bad, or ugly?)
snip
When formatting a new zFS, it's a two step
The problem that I'm having is that we use the 9490s for the esoterics
as well. It has been this way for the longest time and I would hate to
be the one to change it and then the SILO no longer works.
On Monday, the STK support guy will have an answer to those missing
modules. I was just hoping
Hunter,
CICS can also act as a Web Service client. However such kind of question
should be moved to CICS-L rather the IBM-Main.
Roland
You might want to distinguish between using CICS as a web server (check
the CICS TS 3.1 Internet Guide, SC34-6450), and using CICS as a Web
Services
Mark Zelden wrote:
We can... and do have manuals on z/OS in one of our sysplexes. I just
prefer library reader for win-doze over the mvs version.
Seriously? Do you mean the old Library Reader or do you mean the newer,
but definitely not better, Softcopy Reader.
We put our stuff on the
Hi Jeffrey,
Do you mind to provide the CD order number because our LAN internet access
is too slow due the Government scanning everything , so we also prefer to
have all the manuals on a local server but IBM changes the ordering
instructions on us all the time ?
Anton Britz
On Thu, 15 Nov
George Rodriguez wrote:
The problem that I'm having is that we use the 9490s for the esoterics
as well. It has been this way for the longest time and I would hate to
be the one to change it and then the SILO no longer works.
On Monday, the STK support guy will have an answer to those missing
Earlier this month there was a thread on which sub-system ate my
message.
That was another poster and the thread was left hanging.
I'm in the same situation. I set the SLIP, collected the trace records
and I can see a number of sub-systems
seeing the message.
How do I determine
Just curious, if one were to be designing a new, state-of-the-art DBMS
for example, what would one use for a file medium? Is there anything
more robust than a VSAM LDS?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucymarie Ruth
Sent:
My first real job was in 1984 with Texas American (Bank) Services in
Fort Worth. When I started we were in the process of insourcing all
of our applications from EDS and one of the first three we brought back
in house was ATM processing (followed by ACH and Corporate Trust). TASI
built a new
Johnny Luo wrote:
Hi,
While reading this article
(http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/wlm/documents/velocity/velocity.html
), I noticed the reference to Dispatching Management in MVS - TCBs to
Enclaves, Pierce, Bernard R., CMG95.
I searched the web but cannot find it. I also hit
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:24:55 -0500, George Rodriguez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem that I'm having is that we use the 9490s for the esoterics
as well. It has been this way for the longest time and I would hate to
be the one to change it and then the SILO no longer works.
You mean generic?
Hi Jeffrey,
Please could you provide the SKT number for that CD collection.
We also need a copy of all those manuals on our LAN because the internet
here is too slow coming out of the NSA filters..
Anton Britz
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:21:09 -0600, Jeffrey Deaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we
I'm posting this again. I apologize if this is a double-post.
Ok, I'm thick.
I'm trying to create an alias to a user catalog, and I'm getting bit.
/* IDCAMS COMMAND */
DEFINE ALIAS (NAME(MYALIAS) -
Ok, I'm thick.
I'm trying to create an alias to a user catalog, and I'm getting bit.
/* IDCAMS COMMAND */
DEFINE ALIAS (NAME(MYALIAS) -
RELATE(ABC123.CATALOG) -
No problem - just define an esoteric called 9490. Here's what we've got
(ours happens to be called 949A):
Configuration ID . : PRODPLEXMerged Configuration
EDT.Esoteric . . . : 00.949A VIO eligible . : No
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:33:13 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
We can... and do have manuals on z/OS in one of our sysplexes. I just
prefer library reader for win-doze over the mvs version.
Seriously? Do you mean the old Library Reader or do you mean the newer,
In DFSMS Access Method Services for Catalogs, Appendix A. Security
Authorization Levels, Table 5 lists the Required Security Authorization for
Catalogs
Function Performed Define Alias of UCAT
Required RACF for User Catalog None
Required RACF for Master Cat
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 14:09 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:
In a sysplex we need to send the message to the user wherever he's logged
on in the GRSplex. Does anyone have a more modern mechanism to accomplish
this goal?
RO *ALL,C U=?? should do the job.
May even SEND ...
Sounds perfect for a
Skip Robinson wrote:
For many years we have run an MPF exit called DSNHELD, apparently
contributed to the CBT by INTEL (!) in the distant past. The exit sends a
message to a user who owns a data set needed by a batch job. The program,
last modified by us in the early 90's, does a fine job except
Too bad that SYS1.SAMPLIB(ISGECMON) also uses TPUT.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Maybe you're supposed to run ISGECMON on each LPAR where TSO users
might be? Otherwise, I would imagine it would be relatively simple to convert
to issuing a z/OS console SEND command to communicate with users wherever
they may be
Brian
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:12:44 -0600, Lucymarie Ruth
Shane wrote:
RO *ALL,C U=?? should do the job.
If only ... :-D
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
ISGECMON appears to work as self-advertized. A quick test on our sandbox
gives good results: the owning user is notified regardless of where the job
is running.
Note that this program works altogether differently from DSNHELD, which is
an MPF exit kicked off by message IEF863I on the batch job's
Brian Peterson wrote:
Maybe you're supposed to run ISGECMON on each LPAR where TSO users
might be? Otherwise, I would imagine it would be relatively simple to convert
to issuing a z/OS console SEND command to communicate with users wherever
they may be
You are definitely supposed to
look for ich408 in syslog.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Aaron Walker
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 3:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: APF-me
Ok, I'm thick.
I'm trying to create an alias to a user catalog, and I'm
look for ich408 in syslog.
It has nothing to do with APF.
It's a RACF facility class/resource that starts with STGADMIN and ends in
UALIAS.
I don't have the appropriate manual(s) in front of me, but I think the full
name was spelled out by another poster.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Maybe you're supposed to run ISGECMON on each LPAR where
TSO users might be? Otherwise, I would imagine it would be
relatively simple to convert to issuing a z/OS console SEND
command to communicate with users wherever they may be
Yes, that's the idea. Run ISGECMON on each system in
Thanks as well to Mr Jaffe for pointing to the thing right under my
nose. It looks as if running the task on every sysplex member
may do the trick because contention is visible to all around. I'll
play with it.
I could be wrong, but if memory serves me correctly, ISGECMON
reports
Frankly, I'd like to see IBM do this type of donation/assistance program at
the 2-year community college level. Not to knock 4-year schools, but the
type of student in a 2-year school is interested in getting a skill quickly,
and employers like hiring entry-level folks that have had some
My tests involved one TSO user editing a PS file and one batch job
(IERFR14) trying to allocate the same file DISP=SHR .The user gets the
message wherever the job runs.
Lucymarie Ruth
On Nov 16, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Lucymarie Ruth wrote:
Too bad that SYS1.SAMPLIB(ISGECMON) also uses TPUT.
Point of curiosity here. Why not just change it to PUTLINE ?
That should fix the problem, no?
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN
What does the esoteric have to do with it?
At 03:24 PM 11/16/2007, you wrote:
The problem that I'm having is that we use the 9490s for the esoterics
as well. It has been this way for the longest time and I would hate to
be the one to change it and then the SILO no longer works.
On Monday, the
The need here is for an interactive user to get notified of contention. For
batch vs. batch, there's nobody home to answer the phone. Something may
need to be done, but hollering at the resource owner is hoarse abuse.
Since FastSync must emulate any 3390 emulation and Shark is a popular
storage controller I need to support it using the FastSync mode feature of
MFNetDisk.
My product support these CCW for ASync mode but for FastSync I need to be
able to emulate these commands.
Thanks for helping me,
Shai
I've always assumed there was slightly less overhead in running batch
REXX without the TSO TMP, provided you didn't need any TSO commands or
ISPF services - but I suspect this overhead is minimal. I believe you
also avoid the need for several DDs, which in a bizarre case might make
a
If the migrated dataset was scratched, the MCDS definitions for the
dataset are gone also, and this is what is causing your recall failure.
In addition the the DEF NVSAM to catalog the dataset, you will also need
to determine what ML2 volume contains the dataset (may require looking
at old
88 matches
Mail list logo
