On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:39:48 -0500, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
I tried getting LU0 to work, but couldn't. So I used LU2 and it worked.
But used it to do what? What's behind the LU on the remote end?
A 3270 emulator that displays the data? Or a program that does
something else with
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:33:18 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
A minor gloss on Chris's response ...
If you want to indicate that the request units you are sending
constitute a larger unit of data at the level of the application,
There are two bits in the request header
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:36:21 -0500, Neal Eckhardt
neckha...@penntraffic.com wrote:
...
How can I tell. I don't see anything in the FTP parms. We are
running z/OS 1.4 BTW.
I don't know when GSKSRVR came into existance, but if it is in
1.4, issue the command
F GSKSRVR,DISPLAY CRYPTO
It
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:16:35 -0500, Neal Eckhardt
neckha...@penntraffic.com wrote:
...
on the z9 that we just installed. Do I need to be running ICSF for
this assist to work?
ICSF is needed to access a crypto coprocessor. It is not needed to
access crypto assist (if crypto assist means CPACF
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:06:01 -0400, Scott Rowe
scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
I understand the concerns, but this sounds like a good reason for
all ISVs to review their code. ...
Not just ISV; shops should review their own code, too.
My point is that there is no 100 byte limit on the
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:19:14 -0500, Neal Eckhardt
neckha...@penntraffic.com wrote:
... A 20 megabyte file takes about 9 seconds to transfer
without TLS and about 160 seconds with TLS. The transfer rates
are about 130 kbytes/sec with TLS and almost 2000 Kbytes/sec
without.
Are there any
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:56:31 -0700, Howard Rifkind
ibm_m...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
Want cheap..hire a newbie low salary and what not.
Want to get the job done pick an experience sysprog.
...
Ok. 2 not particularly compatable problems:
1. a large number of experienced programmers out of work
2.
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:27:13 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
...
I thought he was pointing out your misspelling of Chris Craddock's first
name as Christ.
...
You didn't hear about Chris's promotion?
Pat O'Keefe
--
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:57:46 -0400, Barkow, Eileen
ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov wrote:
The argument that an existing program cannot handle a longer
parm area if it was available is nonsense - just don't pass it the
longer area and there will not be a problem.
I don't buy that. Whether you are
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:53:03 -0500, Kirk Wolf
k...@dovetail.com wrote:
...
I respectfully disagree:
1) how are two options cleaner? The usage would be ugly...
the JCL coder would have to think - let me see, should I use PARM
with 100 or PARMX with more? and what if both are coded?
I see
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:35:08 +0200, R.S.
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
...
For directory full there is simple trick available: just delete ISPF
statistics action char G).
If the ISPF statistics are important to your shop (They are for ours.),
you can use the PDS utility from the CBT
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:15:59 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
...
:I'd be quite satisfied with this _provided_ it was compatible
:with the existing CALL, LINK, ATTACH, etc. argument lists.
:I.e. on program entry R1 points to a fullword which points
:to a halfword
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:21:40 -0400, Pinnacle
pinnc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
... If there is not enough
space in the dataset, you can do an ADDCYL or ADDTRK, and
PDS will dynamically create another extent. Not sure if VTAM can
tolerate that, but you'll find out soon enough ;-)
...
It's
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:38:31 -0500, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
- After the resolver has successfully contacted a name server, it
stops without contacting the remaining name servers for that
query. Name servers beyond the first in the list are used only if the
name server
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:54:45 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
PARM='PARMX',PARMX='WAY LONGER THAN 100 CHARACTERS'.
...
I'd be quite satisfied with this _provided_ it was compatible
with the existing CALL, LINK, ATTACH, etc. argument lists.
...
(And that symbol
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:10:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
Awww, c'mon. That exposure has existed for classic PARM
since the Dawn of Time, and we aren't hearing complaints,
are we? Clarifying, by symbol, I meant JCL symbol, for
which substitution is supported. I wasn't
On Sept 25 my current employment ends, and since I'm not planning to
look for another job, about 37 years of a system programming career
ends with it. Although the last 20 of those years have been more
support / administration / configuration of MVS communication-related
software than any real
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:26:12 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil
gerh...@valley.net wrote:
Ian wrote:
Take a moment and participate in the poll:
http://www.cicsworld.com/
Like many a poll, it's missing some alternatives, making the
results questionable. ...
I think the results would be pretty
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:38:44 -0500, Ian pcs...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
Thanks Gerhard, leaving out an option for retirees was an omission.
I've added 2 option.
Unfortunately, the really important missing options are
Already retired and no longer taking mainframe-related surveys
and
Dead
(And
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:09:29 -0300, Digestani, Raul
rdigest...@santanderrio.com.ar wrote:
I'm asking about how to obtain current TCB address in an
assembly pgm.
Others have given helpful answers. I'll give the curmudgeonly
answer.
RTFM (where m can stand for either manual or macro).
The
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:05:15 -0500, Diehl, Gary
gary.di...@allstate.com wrote:
Factual ??
Even though I'm one (of many, I'm sure) that started the Fine
usage, in this case I'm sure it stands for Fascinating. Or perhaps
Fun-filled.
Pat O'Keefe
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:07:36 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
In the days of NCCF - and I think NOSP before it - and the first
release of NetView, a semi-automation capability existed after the
clist language was introduced. I describe it as semi-automation
in that the
Sorry for the late response. I was out of town last week (and will be
again by the time this is read, probably).
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:36:51 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
However, the right way to go about suppressing the IST663I message
and all the following messages
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:00:12 -0400, David Andrews
d...@lists.duda.com wrote:
I was not snubbed by anyone! I found everyone to be friendly and
inclusive.
This old joke once had a point, but now it simply is old and not very
funny. ...
I'm guilty first mention this time and I'm unrepentant.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:13:28 -0500, Hal Merritt
hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
...
VPN is a good solution, but not PCI compliant. You shouldn't
have sensitive data flowing over a network in the open. Period.
You would use VPN to gain access to the network, but layer
another solution such as
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:14:03 -0500, Henrique Seganfredo
henri...@seganfredo.com wrote:
...
I am thinking on a way of limiting the % of acceptance of sockets
calls to the mainframe coming from the J2EE 'stress-test' servers.
Is there anything that provides a way of forcing connection limits
on
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:35:18 -0700, John Mattson
john_matt...@ea.epson.com wrote:
... Management ... now wants a SSH based
3270 emulation for accessing mainframe TSO, CICS, and such apps.
...
Uh, something I've missed in the thread so far: What are you
going to talk to? Does some
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:56:05 -0500, William H. Blair
wmhbl...@comcast.net wrote:
... The problem for us
was that we could not invoke the binder API as we assumed we
would be able to, and the reason had to do with restrictions
that originate in LE. For our application, that was a pretty
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:36:42 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
Why is horizontal scrolling so much more difficult than vertical scrolling
in ISPF?
...
Well, for one thing, it's harder to know what the user (or developer)
wants.If it's a table display doing vertical
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:38:03 -0400, John Eells ee...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Correction! The Service and Support is also priced at zero dollars.
...
But SEPARATELY priced at zero dollars.
Pat O'Keefe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:42:52 -0400, Scott Rowe
scott.r...@joann.com wrote:
So, Denver is going to be my first real SHARE trip since 2000, who
else is going to be there?
...
Since my SHAREing days are over I humbly request you and/or
others to snub someone for me. I'd hate to think that SHARE
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:19:16 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
...who can be held accountable if some thing goes wrong.
Accountable? Better read the disclaimer carefully. A software provider
like IBM or an ISV will fix a bug if you report it. But, they won't pay
you for
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:16:10 +0900, Timothy Sipples
timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com wrote:
IBM takes a lot of customer satisfaction measurements, and there is a
pretty good system for looking at trends and taking action if/when
there are weaknesses.
I don't know if the satisfaction measurement
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:02:48 -0700, Schwarz, Barry A
barry.a.schw...@boeing.com wrote:
Even though the PDS calls it a TTR, each member starts a new block so
the situation you describe cannot occur.
...
Thank you for corfirming what my questionable memory told me.
Doesn't that also argue
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:58:21 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
My understanding/conjecture is that when the Assembler
(for example), using BPAM, encounters a COPY nested
within another COPY member, it:
o Does a NOTE to mark the current block.
o Saves the NOTE word _and_ the
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:59:52 -0500, Rick Fochtman
rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
Ok. I didn't word things very clearly.
...
QSAM handles individual members just fine so FIND, READ, WRITE
and STOW are working under the covers. Seems like that covers
most of the functions.
Here I was just trying to
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:50:29 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
...
There does seem to be much more emphasis on getting PMRs
closed than before. Someone's performance appraisal is
probably based on the number of open (or closed) PMRs. ...
I've also noticed a tendency for
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:37:31 -0500, Rick Fochtman
rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
... I was told that if you couldn't master the concepts of
blocking/deblocking in BSAM, you had no business messing
around with BPAM, which was designed as a add on
product for BSAM. ...
He was right, but that logic
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:47:37 -0500, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
I have seen system programmers deliberately colour their
USS message fields without regard to whether or not the colour
caused the field to become unprotected.
Guilty as charged ... almost. Not exactly
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:24:59 -0500, Ed Rabara
edrab...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
By design, the standalone TN3270 Telnet Servers were to remain
active when the
TCPIP address space was terminated, with the expectation that
TCPIP will restart
shortly.
...
Ed, you made the same misinterpretation I
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:20:53 -0500, Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
...
CONCATENATION ENHANCEMENT: Like-attribute concatenation will be
allowed for eligible data sets with different block sizes in any
order; the largest no longer need be first. Eligible data sets are
partitioned or
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:36:44 -0400, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]
On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:31:31 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
(I could ask for the umpteenth time why there is no QPAM, but
I won't.)
If you had asked (which you didn't) someone might have answered
that it's because the definition of the NOTE word has no
provision for
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:20:48 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:52:59 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
I'm just puzzled that the enhancement limited itself to QSAM.
No mention of BPAM.
I had hoped this was an oversight in the doc, but apparently
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:03:33 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 11:57:15 -0400, Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
possibly SNA organization viewed it as competition (even tho SNA had
nothing to do with networking).
Now I'm confused. What does the initialism SNA stand
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:05:02 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net
wrote:
What did NOT come down were the three corresponding telnet
address spaces.
This was by design. (Not just working as designed.)
But that's not true! When OMVS starts to go away, without *any*
stop or other command the
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:28:07 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net
wrote:
Fixing USS design flaws isn't going to be very high on anybody's list.
But having enough complaints from different people (not just me -
after all, we're just someone out in Europe!) may get a few of
the 'suits'
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:34:50 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net
wrote:
...
Yes, I meant Kathy. While I certainly say congratualtions for
the promotion, I still have to ask why a very good technician
has to become a 'suit' :-)
...
I may be wrong, but I thought she was supervisor of the group
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:26:54 -0400, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
...
It is also a problem that some time after 1991, the IBM internal
standards were apparently discarded (apparently with management
blessing). There were specific naming standards, specific requirements
for
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:44:20 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-
i...@gmx.net wrote:
Recent experience has shown (and resulted in *a lot* of ETRs)
that TCPIP cannot exist without the OMVS address space ...
This is absolutely the case. The TCP/IP address space will hang
in initialization if Unix
On another list someone found some product doc that still
mentioned having the largest blocksize first in a concatenation.
While trying to reassure the person I realized how little I actually
knew about the topic. So I've got some questions. (Idle curiosity.)
1. How long ago did this
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:20:53 -0500, Martin Kline
martin.kl...@yrcw.com wrote:
...
BTW, for everyone (anyone?) who bothered to read this far,
how many use a custom USS table? Is it just Chris, Patrick,
myself and a couple other people in the world?
...
You already know I'm in the customized
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:17:07 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-
i...@gmx.net wrote:
I would not call it delayed support, but extremely incompetent
or more bluntly incapable support.
In our case it is Netview, and the person has no clue whatsoever
what a sliptrap does and 'works with MVS' ...
...
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:28:16 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
A problem that I have had in the past was someone updating
a PDS with a blocksize on the DD which causes the blocksize in
the vtoc to be changed.
It is a misdesign that the OS allows this ever to happen. The
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:03:22 -0500, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
Yes, the whole design is a total mess. I suggest you hit your IBM
support with this shoddy design with as much force as you can
muster. It's incompetence piled on incompetence, in the
implementation *and* the
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:07:50 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
To someone who understands the matter - see the analysis above -
incompetence is the only word that seems to fit. The appearance
of incompetence may have been forced on both the designers and
developers - in which
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 01:26:11 EDT, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
...
Not much litany, but IBM has put out Dictionary of Computing for years.
...
Online found this but it's poorly indexed.
_http://www-01.ibm.com/software/globalization/terminology/index.jsp_
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:39:12 -0500, Chris Craddock
crashlu...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Call me a wuss, but I just type FILTER ? and get a fairly i
ntuitive series of panels.
.
Ok Skip, You're a wuss.
:-)
...
Note that Chris comes emerges from lurkdom only when the most
technical of responses is
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:52:14 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity, does anyone actually use ICF - Information
Center Facility?
...
Is ICF the same Information Center as in the Eclipse-based doc
viewing cr..., uhr, system? If so, I had to use it as part
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:47:55 -0500, McKown, John
jmck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
...
How are VTAM Unformatted System Services and z/OS UNIX System
Services the same context? ...
Because it is not VTAM Unformatted System Services any more.
It is z/CS Unformatted System Services, and once the
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:08:59 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:05:45 +0200, CUNY Yann wrote:
You can use SMTP directly with REXX. (Socket REXX).
Here we go again.
There are two email facilities generally available on z/OS:
one with a JES interface,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:27:38 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
...
o Does the OS hold LNKLST data sets open, thwarting reclaim
of PDSE unused space?
...
LLA and XCFAS on every LPAR in the Sysplex that has the dataset
in the LLA. Depending on how many LPARs have the dataset
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:13:55 -0400, Baraniecki, Ray
ray.baranie...@morganstanley.com wrote:
...
Address TSO XMIT BLDVMB.VNETIBM DDNAME(EMAILFIL)
...
XMIT-formatted emails are rejected by our SMTP daemon with a
message claiming we need the gateway function enabled - the
part of the SMTP daemon
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:55:11 +, Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
...
Before automation, we had to enter a $PQ,Q=...
I was going to bring that up. There were probably VERY few times
when $PQ was entered on purpose but if entered it was processed
without question. The only time I saw
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:39:15 EDT, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com
wrote:
...
We did not chose USS as an acronym for z/OS UNIX System
Services.
...
In reality, herding cats is easier than making absolutely sure that
everyone uses the correct full and short names all the time in all
contexts,
Just in case somebody else is not aware of this, ...
The behavior of a compiled REXX exec can depend on which run time
library is used - the SEAGLPA library provided with the compiler or
the so called ALT library SEAGALT (for shops without the compiler).
One big difference: when using
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:54:52 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Not true... We had a programmer who wrote an SVC screener ...
SVC screener = APF.
APF means that you can update the dataset without opening it.
So??? countless installations still do not have a clue about APF
libraries.
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:26:33 -0400, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
...
The picture and last laugh came from one who had been rebuffed for
pointing out the confusion caused by using USS instead of OE or
OMVS, or some such.
...
I admit I could not tell who got the last laugh
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:02:42 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
Martin
Note that there is only one set of USS macros and they some from a VTAM
distribution library, SISTMAC1.
The IP reference, however, also indicates that you can use system
symbols, whereas the SNA reference
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:23:38 +0530, Sachin T
sachin.sach...@gmail.com wrote:
I am downloading it through FTP...
One of the biggest factors effecting large file transfers is the TCP
window size, especially if you have a high speed connection with
significant latency (i.e., a long distance). You
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:12:40 +, Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Also many operators acquired the bad habit of replying U to
everything, and only checking what it was for if it didn't work.
Unfortunately, auto-ops has that same opportunity.
...
There is no incorrect manual action
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:43:32 -0400, David Cole
dbc...@colesoft.com wrote:
...
A couple of years ago, there was a thread called Back doors. I
posted something there about the vulnerability of z/OS to hacking.
Here's the link:
http://alabamamaps.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0608L=IBM-
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:32:29 -0600, Frank Swarbrick
frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com wrote:
I have a very basic one to complain about:
DFS0929I BLDL FAILED FOR MEMBER --DDMPPSZ
This really means that the specified PSB DDMPPSZ is not in the
specified IMS library. Why can't it just say that? As
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:33:38 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
Pat:I am not sure I agree , but I think that most USS messages are at best
inscrutable.
Since I'm one of those that gets anal over this use of USS, I'll object
up front and you can not care starting now.
More importantly,
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:01:03 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
... ideally USS messages are
composed within the installation and so, if they are inscrutable,
the person to whom to complain should be available with an
in-organisation telephone call - assuming the original author
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:46:40 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
...
The proliferation of the PC has resulted in another proliferation: that
of self-proclaimed experts that know next to nothing, but have loud
voices.
...
Oh, come on! We've existed and proliferated long before PCs!
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:06:29 -0700, Guy Gardoit ggard...@gmail.com wrote:
... why would I want to try to RESTORE one or more troublesome
PTFs?? At worst, just IPL the production system(s) from the
previous resvol (set) until the problem can be determined and fixed.
IPLing off the old resvols
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:42:59 -0600, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
...
Twenty Three Quadrillion? Looks like Twenty Three Thousand
Billion to me.
Well, my understanding is that American English uses terms
a little differently than the-rest-of-the-world English.
...
It's those
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:28:42 -0500, Chase, John
jch...@ussco.com wrote:
...
The application is not found (not started, wrong spelling or not
reachable - ie. over cross domain or like)
Why would that be true only for me? I'm on the same network,
in the same building, same list of
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:20:59 -0500, Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Realistically no company in its right mind is going to invest development
and maintenance effort in something they can buy and have somebody else on
the hook for maintaining it. That's what all the buzz about
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:05:39 -0400, Bill Fairchild
bi...@mainstar.com wrote:
Of course you can with EXCP or XDAP, neither of which requires
authorizatoin. ... Anyone who owns a data set that he doesn't want
someone else to be able to read after he deletes it needs to cause it
to be erased
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:21:22 -0400, David Andrews
d...@lists.duda.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 17:33 -0400, John Mattson wrote:
Am I just getting more cranky as I age, or are IBM messages
getting ever more obtuse?
I wouldn't say more obtuse. Remember this chestnut?
IEB817I MEMBER NAME
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:22:24 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
kees.vern...@klm.com wrote:
...
A feature like a Recycle Bin could be useful without introducing too
much overhead. If a dataset is deleted, just keep it, but hide it by
administrating it in a Recycle Bin per volume. HSM could periodically
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:15:02 -0500, Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
...
... we can expect some
future level of zOS to require the new ALS. ...
Sometimes, the new ALS means a renaming of the OS. But again,
that has always been a marketing decision, not a technical one.
...
IBM
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:10:15 -0700, shai hess shai.h...@gmail.com wrote:
...
All your questions easily can be handle. ...
The one part you cannot handle is that, in my opinion, this kind of
function should be implemented by IBM as part of HSM.
One thing that absolutely should NOT be part of
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:03:10 -0500, Ward, Mike S
mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Hello all, is anynet incorporated into z/os vtam like enterprise
extender is? Or is there any way to communicate with an SNA
Gateway(Communications Server) from z/os 1.7 using the enterprise
extender functions?
ANYNET is no
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:44:30 -0500, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
[3] In principle this applies to APPN nodes also and could be used to
argue that, just because a LEN or APPN node does not have a visible PU,
it still has a PU and that the PU could be used to characterise the
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:07:33 -0500, Bill Godfrey
yak36...@yahoo.com wrote:
This problem was discussed, but not resolved, in a thread
named width of postings July 18-19 2007. In that thread,
in one of my posts, I suggested it might be a problem with
the HTML built by the Listserv program...
I
Just one small comment on one very small excerpt:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:07:15 -0500, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
...
Pat, there's a hole in your education! ...
Chris,
This definitely not the first time you've discovered that! :-)
Nor the first time I've displayed that on this
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:34:32 -0500, Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
...
The same thing happens to me when I use IE6. I proved to myself
that my
issue was a browser problem by slowly resizing the browser
window and
watching the words reflow. As the words reflow, the duplicate
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:19:58 -0400, Bob Rutledge
deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
...
You could be in for a surprise later in life...
c:\brping 100.020.002.020
Pinging 100.16.2.16 with 32 bytes of data:
0nn means octal nn.
...
On z/OS (and I assume other IBM mainframe operating systems) a
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:53:46 -0500, Chris Mason
chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
... Regrettably there is no replacement for the
brilliant AnyNet Sockets over SNA function.
While true, there isn't much need for it, either. It's rare to find 2
devices with SNA connectivity that don't have IP
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:36:28 -0400, Bob Rutledge
deerh...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
...
On z/OS (and I assume other IBM mainframe operating systems) a
leading zero signifies a leading zero, not a switch to octal.
We include leading zeroes in some IP addresses because
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:25:19 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
...
It will be simpler with IPv6. The numbers are in hex without need
for any format indicator.
I think IPv6 addresses will actually be more difficult to scan for. You
can optionally specify :: (two colons)
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:15:22 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
...
And, sometimes they're rejected even *after* they're implemented!
:-D
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0407L=ibm-main-
archivesP=R2529I=1X=-
Odd. In following Ed's link (that was not wrapped in the
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:43:11 -0700, Ulrich Krueger u...@pacbell.net wrote:
...
What is your setting of RESOLVERUSAGE?
I believe the value of this parameter needs to be changed if you want to use
IPMAILERNAME xxx.com ALL|UNKNOWN vs IPMAILERADDRESS
...
Yes. If you are going to use IPMAILERNAME
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:23:47 -0400, Tony Harminc
tz...@attglobal.net wrote:
...
HI and friends are conditions in the REXX interpreter, that are
checked at each instruction (REXX clause, I assume that means). It's
just a matter of turning the flag on using the IRXIC service, and the
interpreter
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:59:41 -0400, Mary Anne Matyaz
maryanne4...@gmail.com wrote:
...It's simply a way for US Govt
accounts to open problems and speak to a US citizen. It's
surprising how much is not in the US, and right now if a
Govt customer opens a PMR, and
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:19:01 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike
wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if compiled REXX works differently from interpretive.
I don't think the behavior is any different. I just mentioned that
to indicate that I couldn't see what the exec was doing and that
my diagnostic
What is the supposed difference between HI and HE to REXX?
I have never been able to terminate an errant exec under TSO
with an HI (even though the response to ATTN tells me I can).
Is there anything that would make HI work in some installations
but not others?
I specifically said in some
1 - 100 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
