On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:32:45 -0500, Robert Fake wrote:
I have a customer who is interested in copying several thousand tapes to new
tapes. They are an RMM TMS. Does DFSMS/RMM have a tape copy/stack
capability? Any other thoughts? Client doesn't want to purchase any other
software.
RMM has no
Take a look at Tape/Copy from OpenTech Systems it is very easy to use and
keeps your tape metadata intact.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: 09 March 2007 08:02
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSMS/RMM
All,
I encountered some strange things while porting a C-Module to z/OS that
needs to be called dynamically from a COBOL Program.
The C-Prog is made fetchable by coding
#pragma linkage(MYPROG,fetchable)
in the prog.
Now, when the C-Prog is CALLED, the passed parameters are received
correctly
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:32:31 EST, IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is ISAM still used anywhere under MVS/ESA/OS-390/z?
I don't quite know if I should admit to this, but we still have seven ISAM
files in use under ZOS 1.4 The application guys have been told that 1.7
All,
Is it my imagination or maybe I'm more aware because I am in the middle
of a 1.8 upgrade, but it seems like the amount of noise regarding
significant bugs in 1.8 keep surfacing.
Mentioned recently on IBM-Main:
Robert Justice - JES2 $BR4 abends requiring unscheduled IPL - OA20072
Brian
What ever the reason, the dependence on the web for mission critical
applications like IBMLINK is insane. Any 12 year old with a little bit
of knowledge can cause a crash. What will you tell your management when
your system is down and you can't get on IBMLINK to research the
problem?
We need to
No, I was told NOT to mark the initial logon screen. The quote from the
IBM rep was bookmark any OTHER screen and I can guarantee that it will
work 90% of the time
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:22:38 -0500, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, I was told NOT to mark the initial logon screen. The quote from the
IBM rep was bookmark any OTHER screen and I can guarantee that it will
work 90% of the time
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
Obviously you are welcome to try anything, but please be aware that almost
none of the recommendations that have been posted are things that are in
any way supported and they could have unknowable effects on your system.
There is no approach that will let you safely delete a data set that is in
Jon,
While what you say here sounds good. I beg to differ. IBM-LINK is
important, we cannot be productive in our jobs for long if it is not
available. However, let's not forget the old days where we use the
good 'ole telephone. Heck, I'm only in my low forties, and have not
forgotten. That
web IBMLINK broken again (or is that STILL broken) - meanwhile 3270 access
to ibmlink land working fine and happy
Which one should IBM be getting rid of? How about the one that's broken all
the time?
--
For IBM-MAIN
In a message dated 3/9/2007 12:19:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BB in BBCCHH may have been planned for a number
of related products ... besides the 2321. i have some vague
recollection of discussions related to 1360/pdss which may have also
motivated the
I'm not saying to back to the phone. Heaven forbid! My issue is that we
will be forced back to the phone when we cannot get to the web when we
have a critical problem on our systems. We have a well designed process
for change control, but even that cannot prevent all of our problems. No
matter how
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/07/2007
at 05:29 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
about the only thing that i remember that would use the
2byte/3mbyte/sec channel was the 2505-1 fixed head disk.
That was certainly the first, but I believe that there were two
others; one an array
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/08/2007
at 06:41 AM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When a customer has hundreds of not recently touched
business-critical programs, and no one who knows how they work, and
no budget for conversion, and typical corporate tolerance for risk
(i.e., near zero)
Great point!
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: General question on
We do have CA's Dynam/TLMS, and I've pulled some info on Copycat. We'll
see what management says. After all, sometimes you gotta buy a tool to do
the job!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
In a message dated 3/8/2007 9:42:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my book, that's not *really* a self-modifying channel program. (It's
just
using the same data area in more than one CCW. I know of at least one ISV
product in use today that writes from a buffer
In a message dated 3/9/2007 6:55:20 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
which selected the addressed strip and wrapped it around a drum.
Which gave rise to another scurrilous nickname that I heard used for the
2321: Pluck, suck, and wrap.
Bill Fairchild
Plainfield,
A low cost solution for z/OS is CVS for MVS (dccmn.com/cvsmvs).
You can use it from USS-side via native CVS commands or via Batch-Job from
TSO.
I wrote a ISPF-frontend in REXX for our needs to control the
workflow-levels test, qualitycontrol, integration, production.
This tool is for Mainframe
Bob, HSM and OAM and some other applications provide their own ways to
copy their data to new volumes. For the remaining data, a tape
copy/stacking tool is required. There are many available on the market,
including one from IBM. Look at IBM Tivoli Tape Optimzer.
I have to say that I am not unhappy with the functionality of IBMLink on
the web.
The availability of IBMLink through the web is totally unacceptable. If
it cannot be resolved IBM should not withdraw IBMLINK 3270. As with
other distributed applications it seems like the experience varies. It
snip
Surely I am not the only site in the world? What about all those US
government sites supposedly still running MVS/XA, OS/360, OS2 or
something?
Don't tell me they are an urban myth?
/snip
IIRC the last revision of the ATC system was running on MVS/XA and
3350(3380?) dasd as recently as the
All,
compiling without RENT and linking without REUS=RENT solved the
problems
Bye,
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Re posting from: Timothy Sipples
Getting media is another question. IBM may not be able to supply
it, so you'll have to find it from another source. As long as you
have a valid license this is apparently OK. Most IBM software
doesn't have license keys, so no obstacle there.
The rest of
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:58:20 -0800, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you always CLPA? It takes longer. But, isn't always necessary.
Ed,
Apples and oranges. CLPA is used once a month (or less) during scheduled
outages and the last time I checked CPU utilization on the CPC was
pretty
Daniel McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
We do have CA's Dynam/TLMS, and I've pulled some info on Copycat.
We'll
see what management says. After all, sometimes you gotta buy a tool to
do
the job!
Well, then your problems are almost over: COPYCAT should
at least now when you call ibmlink, they (does sound like the call went to
india) tell you it's down and customers won't be able to use it. hopefully
ibm will give us a rebate on our software support costs?
just so i can keep track, is this the second or third major (not including
those silly
Michael,
This should work the way you've described. I know with RMM that each system
is notified, but the tape is given the cat codes of the system where the
tape is cataloged in the CDS. CA-1 should work the same way. CA-1 should
notify the tape library manager that SY2, not SY1, owns the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
at least now when you call ibmlink, they (does sound like the
call went to
india) tell you it's down and customers won't be able to use
it. hopefully ibm will give us a rebate on our software
support
Pinnacle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Michael,
This should work the way you've described. I know with RMM that each
system
is notified, but the tape is given the cat codes of the system where
the
tape is cataloged in the CDS. CA-1 should work the same way.
latest reponse from IBM:
Please be advised that we are currently undergoing scheduled
maintenance on some of our Web sites. Some abnormalities
are occurring due to this.
**
Scheduled maintenance, oh okay, so that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
latest reponse from IBM:
Please be advised that we are currently undergoing scheduled
maintenance on some of our Web sites. Some abnormalities
are occurring due to this.
From: Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
significant bugs in 1.8 keep surfacing.
Mentioned recently on IBM-Main:
Robert Justice - JES2 $BR4 abends requiring unscheduled IPL - OA20072
Brian Peterson - JES2 Spool drain problem - spool data loss OA17249
These are just a couple that I kept, it seems
Hi Folks,
I've got a bad case of brain lock. (Good thing it's Friday!)
I'm running the STARTER member and getting the following, which
causes a JCL error:
10 IGD01008I SCDFHSM SELECTED
10 IGD302I DATA SET ALLOCATION REQUEST FAILED -
INCOMPATIBLE STORAGE
The BrightStor CA-Dynam/TLMS Tape Management Copycat Utility is designed
to address exactly what you want. Here's the site that gives you an
overall product description for Copycat r11.5:
http://www3.ca.com/solutions/Overview.aspx?ID=1060
Regards,
Gary Garland Gregory, MS
CA Storage Management
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
OK, let's all try to log on and see how fast we can crash it again.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
-Original Message-
OK, let's all try to log on and see how fast we can crash it again.
Well, I got to the Sign in page, but I was there yesterday
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Still can't get in. This is very frustrating.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ibmlink seems to be back bt for how long
-Original
I thinks it works slightly different: supposing both systems are fully
separated, the insertion of the tape is presented to both systems and
both CA-1's will check their TMC for the tape. If present they will
accept the tape and have the TCDB and LM updates.
I suspect the test-tapes are also
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:33:04 -0500, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVS was MVT with Virtual Storage (a 16Meg Machine).
VS1 was similarly MFT with VS.
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2http://patriot.net/~shmuel
Seymour, was SVS and/or VS1
Bob,
What's the applicable STORGRP assignment look like in your ACS routine?
Are you doing something like:
WHEN (STORCLAS = 'SCDFHSM')
SET STORGRP EQ 'SGDFHSM'
or something else?
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
Hi Greg,
Looks like:
WHEN(STORCLAS = 'SCDFHSM') DO
SET STORGRP = 'SGDFHSM'
EXIT
END
Thanks!
*BobL*
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg Shirey
OK, Sorry Jon and Robert.
I read between the lines of your first post (Jon) backwards apparently.
I took your post to read something like if I bookmark a different
screen it will work most of the time. I didn't see anything
specifically about bookmarking (or not) the logon screen. I've been
Hi Greg,
I also added a WRITE to the SG ACS when SGDFHSM is selected.
Looks like it's not being selected as I don't see the message.
Thanks!
*BobL*
--
This e-mail transmission may contain information that is
Must be sporadic, as I just logged in and updated an ETR. Initial
logon screen was slow compared to normal, but it went through.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:21 AM
To:
Bruce Black posted this a while back:
The IBMLINK news from 8/28 says
*Do NOT bookmark the Sign In page*
This article provides recommendations on how to access IBMLink pages,
whether invoking a bookmark you previously created, clicking on a link
in a note or document, or entering a URL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Must be sporadic, as I just logged in and updated an ETR.
Initial logon screen was slow compared to normal, but it went through.
My attempt has been clocking on the logon screen for about 20
I'm probably going back too far (2-3 yrs) but the d/t 3494 would present
the insert to whichever system answered up first not all systems. From
what has been said, it appears that's changed?
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
Pinnacle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe
Wouldn't a regular IPL sequence qualify as a self-modifying channel program?
Typically: Read more CCWs from the IPL device then TIC to those CCWs
(IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
In a message dated 3/8/2007 9:42:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In
Has anyone mentioned WebMethods yet? That's what we use here at the
Fairfax County Gov't in Virginia.
TTFN,
Mark H. Young
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
OTOH, IEBCOPY gets executed thousands a times a day. Including prime shift /
hours where CPU utilization is at or near 100% across all our
CPCs.
Not at our shop.
And, not all IEBCOPY's are load libraries.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Shmuel! Where ya been?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is IEF686I DDNAME REFERRED TO ON DDNAME KEYWORD ... new?
In
In a message dated 3/9/2007 10:04:26 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouldn't a regular IPL sequence qualify as a self-modifying channel program?
Typically: Read more CCWs from the IPL device then TIC to those CCWs
Absolutely. I forgot about that one. I didn't
Mark H. Young wrote:
Seymour, was SVS and/or VS1 what you ran on a 360 or 370 processor with a
DAT box? Or did MVT or MFT run native on those systems with a DAT box?
SVS prototype started out as adding virtual tables and CCWTRANS (from cp67) cut
into the side of MVT ... with otherwise
Sure; soon as the government starts paying interest on tax refunds.
It does in Canada!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought the SDSF summary command was probably a Rexx program, but I
don't see it in my site's *.REXX.APPL.LIB. Where does this command
exist?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I came across this little ditty and chuckled a bit while racking my brain
trying to think of what type of mainframe the article refers to.
I can't think of one, can you?
http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/5145?source=NLT_SHARKnlid=6
Hi
We have jus finished the installation of zDASD (from BusTech) , to
change
our old Fujitsu disk system to an IBM DS4300 Total Storage connected over
zDASD to ESCON.
Till now very positive experience.
--
For
I don't know if I can ID the mainframe but I'm betting the CE for that
site was a special brand of stupid if he let a tape drive sit bad for four
[insert favourite expletive here] years.
I wonder why the BOFH was allowed to remain employed, though. Unless the
company was required to hire the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
I came across this little ditty and chuckled a bit while
racking my brain trying to think of what type of mainframe
the article refers to.
I can't think of one, can you?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doc Farmer
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Can you ID this mainframe?
I don't know if I can ID the mainframe but I'm betting the
CE for
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:08:17 -0700, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the SDSF summary command was probably a Rexx program, but I
don't see it in my site's *.REXX.APPL.LIB. Where does this command
exist?
It is a REXX program, but that sounds like a local library - so unless
Similar situation at a former, nameless site. Director had dictated no
fixed disk drives, and no tapes, and BTW, no need to back up the load
modules - if we need to get them back, we can recompile them. Head
crash on the backup disk drive, operator panics and places good disk on
crashed drive.
--snip--
In a message dated 3/8/2007 2:05:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
_patrick.okeefe @ WAMU.NET_ (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
I remember 3 different BPSloaders - 3-card, 7-card, and 12-card versions.
There very well could have
Hi All.
I EXCluded a volser from an Optimizer Copy request. The volser was
INCluded because its LOCATION is in the INClusion filter list. Does anyone
know how I can exclude this voler?
TIA
Message from output:
ReqNo(00068),Attempting to resolve VOLSER chain for VOLUME(911456)
-snip
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
at least now when you call ibmlink, they (does sound like the
call went to
india) tell you it's down and customers won't be able to use
it. hopefully
On 9 Mar 2007 09:52:48 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Zelden)
wrote:
IBM distributes it in hlq.SISFEXEC as member ISFESUM which has an
alias of SUMMARY.
Thanks, ISF.SISFEXEC(ISFESUM) is in our ISRDDN path. How does the
alias work?
-snip--
Seymour, was SVS and/or VS1 what you ran on a 360 or 370 processor with
a DAT box? Or did MVT or MFT run native on those systems with a DAT box?
unsnip
MVT and MFT never knew anything about DAT boxen. IIRC,
Well, back in 1999 I was given the task to phase out the usage of reel
tapes on what I think was a Motorola 220? Believe it or not, this
machine is probably still running. The coil still needs to be wound
manually by a Siemens engineer who last time I heard wanted a lot of
money to get on the
I had a typo in the Exclusion list. Corrected typo, and the volser was
excluded.
~~Carol
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
IBM's Pacific-basin customers outside the US and Japan cannot get an
'entire newly-ordered product' in this way. (Here I am conjecturing
more than I really know: My client in New Zealand cannot; and Shane in
Australia cannot.)
Why?
Because of deficiencies in IBM's ordering and licensing
I have a bit of a weird situation in which I'm running a clist in a step
of a batch job. In this clist I'm reading an input file containing
variables that I would like to use in the following steps of the same job.
For example as datasetnames, PARM options etc. I hope I'm making sense.
Is
Rick Fochtman wrote:
MVT and MFT never knew anything about DAT boxen. IIRC, the only 360 with
a DAT box was the 67, mainly for running CP67/CMS, the predecessor to
VM. The early 370 machines, 155 and 165 had no DAT box but they could be
upgraded to 155-II and 165-II by adding a DAT box, along
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:17:44 -0700, Howard Brazee wrote:
Ahh, ISF.SISFEXEC(SUMMARY) exists as well.
I don't find this command in my SDSF manual. What does it do ??? Is it
documented somewhere ???
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Browsing ISF.SISFEXEC(SUMMARY) reveals:
/* FUNCTION: Issue ISPF/PDF FIND ALL commands for selected */
/* strings, such as step condition codes. */
/* */
/* OPERATION: This is a sample macro
George Dranes wrote:
I have a bit of a weird situation in which I'm running a clist in a step
of a batch job. In this clist I'm reading an input file containing
variables that I would like to use in the following steps of the same job.
For example as datasetnames, PARM options etc. I hope I'm
I have a bit of a weird situation in which I'm running a clist in a step
of a batch job. In this clist I'm reading an input file containing
variables that I would like to use in the following steps of the same
job.
For example as datasetnames, PARM options etc. I hope I'm making sense.
How many have complained here and not followed up with a call to IBM?
How many have called 1-800-543-3912 and tried to get a resolution?
First they insisted that I use www.ibm.com/ibmlink but I finally
convinced them that didn't work either.
So they tried it and have now opened a Sev 1. (15:14
i keep running into goggle hits that reference www.mainserver.state.mn.us
but it doesn't seem to be a site that's easily accessed? i went to their
site which is the state of MN and never found the 'intertech s/390' site.
does anyone know if it's available as a source?
Jack Kelly
LA Systems
I solve this type of data passing requirement by generating JCL SET statements
(in job #1, stored in
a PDS member) and using those SET (they are symbolics without using a PROC)
definitions to
substitute PARM= and JCL DD statement parameters. The subsequent job would use
a JCLLIB and JCL
Tss was implemented at Computer Scieces Corp
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anne Lynn Wheeler
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history
Rick
Bob Halpern wrote:
Tss was implemented at Computer Scieces Corp
ref:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007f.html#7 IBM S/360 series operating systems
history
at one time there was this joke about there possibly being 1200 people in mohansic
working on tss/360 and total of 12 people at the
Howard,
How about keeping our business inside our country - which also
contains sizeable numbers of people who are a threat?
Well, just to be fair, how about taking any other country's business out of
your country.
The model that I come across for many outsourcing companies is that having
Hi.
I have what is probably a basic question regarding AFP fonts. I have
dug through the manuals I can find and can't seem to get a good answer
to this. In looking at my PSF JCL member for starting a couple virtual
printers, I see in the PRINTDEV statement, CHARS=(GT18,GT12). I have
figured
The model that I come across for many outsourcing companies is that having
many customers sharing the same site and infrastructure leads to a lower cost
that can be passed on to the customer.
Until (when/if) the service providers start cutting costs by getting rid of the
(expensive) SME's and
Gerard,
Wouldn't the easiest way be to use Shadowimage, Flashcopy, or Timefinder
depending on which storage vendor you are using?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ceruti, Gerard G
Sent: Thursday, 8 March 2007 9:33 PM
What does UNIT NOT JES3 say about dataset allocation and formatting?
I am trying to understand why a started-task seems to change the
attributes of a dataset when it opens.
The dataset is allocated:
SPACE=(CYL,(3,1),RLSE),
Ted,
Canada, right? Must be something peculiar going on in your part of the
Commonwealth.
I have seen companies from outsourced in Australia and Asia that have been
happily running that way for 10 years or more. This includes Banks, Finance
companies, retail stores, Telcos and Manufacturers. I
Canada, right? Must be something peculiar going on in your part of the
Commonwealth.
Actually, while I'm a Canadian, the company is head-officed in the States.
I can't go into too much detail, but our service provider is in the southern
states and they are dumbed-down.
Plus, we outsourced
B is for bold, I for Italic, T for standard. the number is the
points, and the first character indicates the font type. this is
in the Font reference guide, I believe. There are also different pel
sizes, for print quality.
Doug
At 06:05 PM 3/9/2007, you wrote:
Hi.
I have what is probably
Has anyone run across a situation where the MVS NFS Server retains its
exclusive enqueue against an MVS data set (not a HFS file) created by one of
its clients even after the client no longer use the file?
NFS clients run on AIX.
Because MVS NFS Server holds an exclusive enqueue, MVS batch jobs
On Mar 9, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Ted,
Canada, right? Must be something peculiar going on in your part of the
Commonwealth.
I have seen companies from outsourced in Australia and Asia that
have been
happily running that way for 10 years or more. This includes Banks,
Finance
In a message dated 3/9/2007 6:24:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the number is the
points, and the first character indicates the font type. this is
On the old fonts the number is the pitch(or characters per inch).
Think part of the PSF post-install is to
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
part of the reason that i don't really know the definitive answer to
your question is that BB in BBCCHH may have been planned for a number
of related products ... besides the 2321. i have some vague
recollection of discussions related to 1360/pdss
I agree, I've reported six bugs over the past 3 weeks, on 1.7 I only
reported 3 bugs total.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Hello Steve,
There is a very smart system called Proteus available from Fundi Software
in Australia
site:http://www.fundi.com.au/pr_proteus.html
dont work for them, but I like to promote Aussie software. :-)
Regards
Bruce Hewson
Ed,
I'm talking companies that measure their profits in USD$ with 9 zeroes. I'm
talking 100s of Terrabytes. I'm talking Disaster Recovery of 1000s of km.
There are some itsy bitsy accounts mixed in with the larger ones, but the
shared resources, premises and infrastructure improves the costs of
99 matches
Mail list logo
