Yes, I know what IAM is: A replacement for VSAM. But I believe it's built
on BDAM and provides a VSAM API on top of that.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
whether some more might get replaced.
Not knowing the IAM product particularly well, and being an employee of
the maker of VSAM :-) , I have to assume Innovation have a method of
managing these data sets.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking
I would argue you should expose the full function of DFSORT control
statements if you can.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
Not following the link I don't know how you got to BP01 or PIPE but the
first of these two (at least) sounds like a BatchPipes/MVS subsystem name.
In fact it's the classic example name.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
If you can mimic in C / C++ what the JZOS DFSORT class does in java then
that'd be good. I have personal experience of using it and writing up in a
Redbook a while ago. It was certainly consumable.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking
to be
pushed down from the C / C++ program into DFSORT. Perhaps all of it. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Note: You can't run DFSORT on zLinux.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
By the way you're not nearly as anonymous as SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Anonymous
might suggest to you. :-)
Cheers, Martin (far from anonymous) :-)
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Right: The conflation of miscellaneous speed up techniques is probably
what keeps it going. As I present it's going to take more from
installations / app maintainers to keep it effectively going - as there'll
be less from chip- and system-makers (in all likelihood).
Cheers, Martin
Martin
Note: REXX reading VBS only became available with 2.1.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
be the usual CICS-centric question - and I agree
with Lizette that CICS-L is a more fertile place for this discussion. (Not
that I can answer THIS question but I also participate in CICS-L.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
JNI code is NOT zIIP-eligible. For significant pathlength or frequent
calling that probably matters a great deal.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
Thanks Kirk! I did not know that. Might explain why CTG has such a high
zIIP-eligible percentage. Note: The numbers as they happen are available
in SMF 30 - for zIIP-eligibility and the rest, as well as what actually
ends up on zIIP.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
Use SMF 30 (2,3) Interval records. Most customers have this on - in my
experience.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog
hiperspace).
I've seen this scenario a number of times, often represented by the RMF
interval-level Minimum Available Frames being near zero while the
interval-level Average Available Frames is usually (but not always)
somewhat higher.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
For most installations your virtual-to-real ratio is way out of date.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Well, I like to see zero paging and, more than that, some spare real
memory. What I don't much like to see is installations with tons of real
memory and not exploiting it (where they could). For many the memory world
changed with z10 and again subsequently...
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
Except that Cyrillic is an easy alphabet to learn - at least upper case
is. :-) And it's particularly sensible with its single characters for dzh,
ch, sh, ts, ya etc.
And German is sensible too, apart from the boot verb., :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
This whole conversation fans the flames of one of my pet peeves: I've
mentioned to Development in the past that people need better - in SMF -
descriptions of memory above the LPAR level.
This would be a piece of that jigsaw, I think.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
That spreadsheet - in my customer set (that's all of you :-) ) - usually
has a swear-word at the beginning of it, followed by something like
Machine Configuration.
A right old PITA to maintain. And on more than one occasion has proven
wrong. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
. :-) In
fact not suggesting ANYONE's do.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks
Certainly when I get data from customers they might've used either TRSMAIN
or AMATERSE and it still unpacks fine with either. This is something I do
on a regular and frequent basis.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence
, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Anne Lynn
Isn't this just one aspect of how retrievability has changed since these
titles were thought up? Without having specific proposals I think we (IBM
and customers) should think it through.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
I think you're going to like them, Mark. Not that I've found a system to
play with this on yet.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
The OP wanted SMF. The nearest thing - which might well be good enough -
is the Userid / Group in Type 30.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
A long time ago our code used to merge SMF 26 and SMF 30 - because we
inherited it from SLR base table support. I'm wondering if there's enough
value in doing that again. Someone on the team rewrote our code, dropping
the merge (probably wisely).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
I think it would also make job cloning easier.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
Not saying you're wrong but OSX is based on Unix.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
Maybe he's just pointing out that IRD Weight Management and Softcapping
are two separate concepts/knobs/dials.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
As always EXCP counts in SMF records are a movable feast: They are
what the access method wants them to be. :-)
Type 42-6 is probably a better bet - and will give a guesstimate of
bufferability from the cache statistics.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator
SYSEVENT treated Flash Express.
Hoping this is useful to some of you, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
storage management and hardware.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs
in instream restriction is going to be significant.
We're likely to parameterise things that look like clone jobstream number
as well as some character strings related thereto.
But for now thanks Peter for pointing out this restriction. It might
affect what we do.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
There IS some information on reads versus write in 42-6. I'm hazy on the
details but it could be useful with the what is Disc? question.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
Hi Al! Did it take into account Sync Rem Copy (PPRC and the like)? I don't
even remember if PPRC had been released back then.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
I think it's MASPEGHI. And as someone who tries to keep up with
programming languages I'm not much the wiser.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
And in terms of data streams (Multi)Markdown is very much like that; The
markup doesn't get in the way. So I use it for much of my writing.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
it - but this might be good
enough for the OP. It is after all no secret the TLIB exists - and you
could test with alternate TLIBs.
But now back to reality. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
Not sure that addresses the licence cost issue. BTW hello Bobby!
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Is this whole limiting number of DD's thing a (lack of) XTIOT thing?
By the way I've thought for some time DFSORT needs a BUCKET ICETOOL
operator like this. But perhaps as a sample it'd be good. How about it Sri
Hari?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator
customer up the learning curve,
given they've been forced to neglect their systems and applications for so
very long. I suspect quite a lot of consultancy is driven by that poise
recovery dynamic.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
You can't share a CF LPAR between sysplexes. You should define at least 2
CF LPARs. And you should avoid - if at all possible - having CF LPARs
sharing ICF processors (unless you really don't care about performance).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator
observed.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
- as getting it wrong can
seriously affect stability.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
So tell me, if one wanted to achieve this apparently non-standard effect
how WOULD one go about it?
Not that I want to but it HAD to be asked. :-)
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email
Not knowing who the authors were, is it possible they were explaining REXX
to (what they thought to be) a CLIST-literate audience? TSO/E 2.1 would've
been a shock to some. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
Without wishing to appear a die hard defender of DFSORT :-) I would
expect DFSORT's I/O speed to be better than that of a program (even with
decent Sequential File tuning). But that quite possibly DOESN'T matter.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator
Lots of Unaccounted For time in DB2 and no zIIP? If DB2_Version = 10
might be a quick win to add one. Though not, of course, free.
But Unaccounted For time in DB2 can be many things: Waiting on CPU is one
but another fave is paging.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
to a max of 6 with 3090E was quite a big deal. And
from 6 to 8 (and then to 10) with 9021 likewise. Now we add handfuls at a
time. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
television in the past
week. :-)
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
One approach is to set it high and then gradually lower it, checking for
time spent in Wait For First Dispatch versus Wait For Subsequent
Dispatch in Monitor Trace.
A bit labour- and data-intensive but reasonable for a relatively accurate
answer.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
Isn't DSNX9WLM the program for DB2 Stored Procedures server address
spaces? And not a DB2 Utility program?
Might have some bearing.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
DB2 MEMLIMIT for DBM1 is 4TB - according to SMF 30 (and John Campbell).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
And the former has the PIC in plain view in.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
Type in the Report Class in the panel.
And to the OP: It's Workload and within that Service Class. Just to
tighten up your terminology: Welcome to the steep part of the learning
curve. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
In answer to a different question (memory purchased) a customer once said
we ask our (IBM) salesman. :-)
Equivalent? :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Note mention of z/OS rather than zLinux. Yay!
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
I'm wondering if the OP actually wants some commentary like at line 1234
in File A there's no match from File B. I know Billy didn't say that
but...
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email
Don't forget ASCH and OMVS. And for 7-digit Ids expect to see eg J1234567.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https
Would XML suit you?
It's what I do in Batch from the ISPF TLIB. I'm not sure whether to write
up what is an undocumented and unsupported technique.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email
Actually I sort of already did:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/MartinPacker/entry/playing_spot_the_difference_with_wlm_service_definitions?lang=en
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802
I'm not a WLM developer. I'm hoping someone who is will answer that point.
If not we'll have to raise a requirement.
Sorry, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
This was also an interesting (related) thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/1bnhG_--Zzc
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
We stopped asking for SMF 41-3 LONG ago: The result for LLA was always the
same.
We're more or less stuck with double it then double it again if things
get better. Not sure how we'd tell if things actually DID get better.
So the exits route is good for the very curious.
Cheers, Martin
Martin
Well I obviously haven't learnt much in the last 9 years. :-) Or, more
positively, at least I'm consistent. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Elardus Engelbrecht
for opinions.
And display my ignorance. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks
Well I, for one, am jolly glad people are examining their IEFUSI exits,
particularly in the area of MEMLIMIT.
It's something I've been advising for quite a while...
Cheers, Martin
From: Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 09/12/2014
obliged to reply.)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
See, I told you it was an interesting problem. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
On VSAM I suspect it's 32K-7 bytes. The 7 for a CIDF (for the CI) and a
RDF (for the one record you could stuff into a 32K CI).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
and PR/SM but generally not. Such
interactions include if IRD Weight Management is active.
And I see you already have several other answers - so it looks like you
came to the right place. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
Sounds like you also need to familiarise yourself with how DIST works -
meaning enclaves that run the actual DDF SQL. As I say, unlikely DIST
itself but rather more likely the DDF is in play.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
If you're lucky... Sometimes it's just zeroes. :-)
GDAR, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
And I prefer (but am not consistent with) data set as in a set of
data. And usually I don't actually mean a set of data. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Enclave SRB
(part of TCB as it's Preemptible-Class).
I'm just aware that this would in my experience (FWIW) be a first:
Non-enclave in DIST being a problem. But life is full of firsts. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center
I suspect returning to that level of frankness would get you into machine
instruction timings - and all that goes with it. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
There is no BC machine... :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks
Or zeeSerious or zoss or zedoss or zeeoss - all of which I've
heard many times over. :-) Or even zee oh ess. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
By George I think he's got it :-) - as I hope did many others.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
BSAM is used by DFSORT for Extended Format Sequential access - to name but
one quite large use case.
(And to get back to the thread) it copes with Spanned VBS records. I'm
sure other products do, too.
But I think the OP's curiosity is well founded.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
This is an interesting question. One thing - and I'm not sure a check
could check for this - that I find occasionally is different SMF intervals
on different systems. If they're related (as in collected into the same
performance database) summarisation can be difficult.
Cheers, Martin
Martin
That sounds like commenting on rumours. :-)
And that's all you'll get from ME on that subject. Maybe. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
A reasonable question to the Original Poster (OP) is what are you hoping
to achieve with 64 bit?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs
Cauchy has a lot to answer for by not convincing TPTB (The Pythons That
Be) :-) of the correctness of his Integral Theorem. :-)
Cheers, Martin (perhaps a tad overcaffeinated) :-)
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245
You MIGHT be. :-) That's why I posed my suggestion of DC more as a
question than a prescription.
It turns out there's no choice. :-(
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
And through the wonders of Twitter and Facebook I can tell you my
tweet/posting of the link to this fine book garnered a bunch more
expressions of appreciation.
Cheers, Martin
From: Scott Ford idfzos...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 09/02/2015 19:09
Subject:Re:
Not sure. But would a Defined Capacity limit for the LPAR work instead?
(Or better?) That certainly can be done - and I've seen it occasionally in
my customer set.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245
More likely IEFUSI or similar. Hiperspace is NOT in the 31-bit (or 64-bit)
memory map. That's the point of it.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter
I wonder if Data Windowing Services is still around. I vaguely recall they
used Hiperspaces (still perfectly valid but mapped to Central).
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
Hiperspace came along about 22 years before 64-bit ANYTHING, let alone
64-Bit Virtual.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Doability when you don't have a chance to do 64 Bit. :-( :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
Yes, but a key question is should we share a zIIP.
An answer is often practically not.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Can't answer your question but it reminds me of a long-standing conjecture
of mine:
I wonder if compilers plant idiomatic machine code - from which
higher-level constructs can be garnered. I would expect optimising
(prefer improving) compilers would defeat that.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
Let me show my naivete here...
... I normally search in a dump on RTM2WA. Is this different? And if so
why?
Cheers, Martin (still learning, I hope...) :-)
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac
. Probably not what you want to do.
I firmly expect 60 - 66 to be in the stuff is in variable positions
category.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook
Agree with the stacked graph of LPARs. But one plea: Do it by processor
pool for (at least) GCPs and zIIPs. (IFLs might be meaningful, ICFs less
likely, zAAPs possibly.)
Which takes us away from one number. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide
Just this week I had a discussion with an IBM specialist supporting a
European customer where the companion topic of stopping sysprogs from
subverting SMF records came up.
Protect the data is the key. And SMF 15 might be useful for tracking
updates.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion
As a Redbooks author I'll take a percentage. :-) TGIF. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com
101 - 200 of 658 matches
Mail list logo