On 11/16/2013 8:56 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 11:26 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
Just so I understand. You got your kernel--3.10.10 (?)--to boot from
the EFI partition? And without initrd or initramfs? The answer to
this question is important to me.
Yes. 3.10.10. Selectable in the BIOS
On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
If I can't make any head-way in the next few days, I'm going to install
a minimal ArchLinux system and try the various GRUB options. I don't
think they sign their kernels--see last paragraph--and that will test
the GRUB stuff.
About 3 weeks ago, as
On 18/11/2013 1:28 AM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/16/2013 8:56 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 11:26 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
Just so I understand. You got your kernel--3.10.10 (?)--to boot from
the EFI partition? And without initrd or initramfs? The answer to
this question is
On 11/17/2013 04:10 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
snipped your answers to my questions. Thank you. They helped.
For background on my comments below:
Motherboard: ASUS P8Z77-V LK with latest BIOS update #1104
Intel i7-3770K
16G Corsair DDR3
2
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:02:09PM -0600, Dan McGhee wrote:
I don't know how, or even
if, the distros have modified GRUB in their packages.
I remember reading something that said fedora's grub is very
different from upstream. Try using cgit to see what fedora are
doing [ use a graphical
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:10:57PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
The kernel. It dies with a message like ... kernel panic ...
Must you do a hard reset to start over or can you use
ALT-CTRL-DEL?
I have to recycle the power.
With your later
On 11/17/2013 06:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:10:57PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/16/2013 6:10 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
The kernel. It dies with a message like ... kernel panic ...
Must you do a hard reset to start over or can you use
ALT-CTRL-DEL?
I have to
On Nov 17, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
I remember reading something that said fedora's grub is very
different from upstream. Try using cgit to see what fedora are
doing [ use a graphical browser ].
ĸen
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/grub2.git/plain/
I found this a while back
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UEFI type boot
location on a brand new hard drive. I've been reading a lot of online
documentation, and have tried a first-cut installation, but am not
having success
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UEFI type boot
location on a brand new hard drive. I've been reading a lot of online
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm experimenting with installing to a UEFI type boot
On 11/16/2013 05:44 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm
On 11/16/2013 05:44 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with an MBR type boot
installation, I'm
On 11/16/2013 7:36 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
I think efivarfs is new in 3.10.10 CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=(y or m) is what
I recommend if you're using 3.10.10
The information I've gotten so far about setting these CONFIG variables,
from Arch Linux, rodsbooks.com and other places, is summarized here,
On 11/16/2013 06:51 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/16/2013 7:36 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
I think efivarfs is new in 3.10.10 CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=(y or m) is what
I recommend if you're using 3.10.10
The information I've gotten so far about setting these CONFIG variables,
from Arch Linux,
On 11/16/2013 8:17 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
Alan, thank you for validating my research. Let me validate yours. Those
recommendations work.
Good!
Did you see the questions I asked you earlier? I hope you will answer
them. They are important to my research.
Yeah, I saw them. I'm in the process
On 11/16/2013 07:26 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/16/2013 8:17 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
Alan, thank you for validating my research. Let me validate yours. Those
recommendations work.
Good!
Did you see the questions I asked you earlier? I hope you will answer
them. They are important to my
On 17/11/2013 11:26 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 05:44 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
On 17/11/2013 10:10 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 11/16/2013 03:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
Hi,
After getting the stock LFS system installed, with
On 11/16/2013 07:56 PM, Geoff Swan wrote:
Just so I understand. You got your kernel--3.10.10 (?)--to boot from
the EFI partition? And without initrd or initramfs? The answer to
this question is important to me.
Yes. 3.10.10. Selectable in the BIOS efi boot manager and boots
directly,
I tryed now: delete all from /tools, all unpacked sources, begin at first
with compile of binutils. That suceeded. Then, I continued the process with
compile of gcc. Sorry, nothing change, it give me the error message written
above.
Today afternoon I should install the unlike ubuntu
Le 22/10/2013 23:31, Viola Zoltán a écrit :
lfs@Csiszilla ~ $ cat .bashrc
set +h
umask 022
LFS=/Mount/Simplicity
LC_ALL=POSIX
LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-pc-linux-gnu
Should be :
|LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-lfs-linux-gnu
See section 4.4 and 5.2 for why.
|
PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
export LFS
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
From: Viola Zoltán violaz...@gmail.com
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
Pass 1
Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
CFLAGS=-fno
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:01:40 +0100
From: (akhiezer)
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5. GCC-4.8.1 -
Pass 1
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
From: Viola Zoltán violaz...@gmail.com
To: LFS Support
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:01:40 +0100
From: (akhiezer)
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5.
GCC-4.8.1 -
Pass 1
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:24 -0400
From: Viola Zoltán violaz...@gmail.com
To: LFS
-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Oct 23 21:34:56 2013
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:16:23 -0400
From: Viola Zoltán violaz...@gmail.com
To: akhiezer lf...@cruziero.com,
LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error
: Re: [lfs-support] Newbie need help - bus error in 5.5.
GCC-4.8.1 -
Pass 1
Sorry, nothing change. I was deleted all GCC source, begin from first
the
5.5 chapter (compiling of GCC), with this command (after the configure):
CFLAGS=-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti make
but it write me
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
@akhiezer:
I tryed:
CFLAGS=-O2 -g make
but no changed:
My final suggestion is : try a different host distro. The recent
google matches for this were almost all for people updating packages
on gentoo, which is why I
Dear Ken, I am sure that this is no memory problem. I have absolutely full
totally new memory chipset in my laptop, and all programs work very good,
both in my Sabayon (because I use not Gentoo, but Sabayon) and my old
Ubuntu 11.10 distro in an other partition.
Okay, I try the LFS with any other
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 07:14:15PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
Dear Ken, I am sure that this is no memory problem. I have absolutely full
totally new memory chipset in my laptop, and all programs work very good,
both in my Sabayon (because I use not Gentoo, but Sabayon) and my old
Ubuntu 11.10
Dear Ken, I need the new distro from you suggestion ONLY, JUST for the
building of LFS, no for other works/jobs! No problem, if it not have
wifi-possibility or others. I saved the full LFS and BLFS books to my
new-used partition, I will work from its. And I was downloaded all needed
packages, of
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:00:36PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
Dear Ken, I need the new distro from you suggestion ONLY, JUST for the
building of LFS, no for other works/jobs! No problem, if it not have
wifi-possibility or others. I saved the full LFS and BLFS books to my
new-used partition, I
Okay, thanks.
2013/10/23 Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:00:36PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
Dear Ken, I need the new distro from you suggestion ONLY, JUST for the
building of LFS, no for other works/jobs! No problem, if it not have
wifi-possibility or
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:31:19PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
Hi, excuse me for the bad English... I try LFS from Sabayon host system,
with this GCC version:
lfs@Csiszilla /Mount/Simplicity/sources/gcc-build $ gcc --version
gcc (Gentoo Hardened 4.7.2-r1 p1.5, pie-0.5.5) 4.7.2
The binutils
Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
CFLAGS=-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti; make
CFLAGS=--fno-exceptions --fno-rtti; make
but nothing changed, the compile not succeeded, same error message...
2013/10/22 Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:12:09PM
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 07:41:24PM -0400, Viola Zoltán wrote:
Excuse me, I am very newbie and very idiotic... I tryed it:
CFLAGS=-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti; make
CFLAGS=--fno-exceptions --fno-rtti; make
but nothing changed, the compile not succeeded, same error message...
I intended
This may come close to or straddle the off topic line for this list.
I thought I'd ask my question anyway since there are some who use the
More Control hint and who run into some of the same frustrations that I
do. There is a question about the use of find in this post. If you
don't want to
Le 16/10/2013 20:43, Dan McGhee a écrit :
[...]
Here's the find statement:
find / -xdev -type d -gid $(id -g packageuser name) \! -path /usr/src
\! -path /tools -print
This statement achieves all the parameters stated above with the
addition that it ignores /tools also. Now I would
On 10/16/2013 03:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
I've never tried two -exec directives in find, sorry. What I know is that
xargs is more flexible,
and I recommand that you insist on having it work.
It could be something similar to:
find... -print| xargs -I xxx sh -c 'chmod xxx; chown xxx; echo
On 10/16/2013 03:59 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
On 10/16/2013 03:15 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
I've never tried two -exec directives in find, sorry. What I know is that
xargs is more flexible,
and I recommand that you insist on having it work.
It could be something similar to:
find... -print|
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Dave Wagler wrote:
I just can't figure out how to write the configure command to
suppress this check.
Thanks for any help.
Libass isn't in BLFS. Where did you get libass? Maybe you need to
install fribidi!
Sincerely,
William Harrington--
http
Hi everybody,
Thanks for all the advice, so far.
@Pierre:
I'll give that a go, if all else fails. Somehow, removing the linux
partition seems a bit scary, especially after my recent experience :)
@akh:
I'm afraid the disk cloning is not an option. My computer is a laptop,
and it's the only
chickened out and
thought i'd ask for help. Unsurprisingly, I can no longer boot into
Windows, now. Any help would be much appreciated. This is how my
partition table looks, atm:
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149168
Le 10/03/2013 10:33, tilmanbregler a écrit :
Hi,
so this is a bit emberassing, and I appreciate if you say this is
nothing to do with you. I have this dual boot Ubuntu 12.04/Windows 7
setup. And to make room for th LFS partitions i decided to shrink the
Windows 7 partition.
[...]
This
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:33:39 +
From: tilmanbregler tilmanbreg...@gmail.com
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: [lfs-support] help, i hosed my windows partition
.
.
so this is a bit emberassing, and I appreciate if you say this is
nothing to do with you. I
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:33:39 +
tilmanbregler tilmanbreg...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size
One other thing, although it qualifies as a false hope: it just may be
possible, at least theorethically, to recover most or all of the
contents of the NTFS partition. So if you did manage to nuke the few
starting sectors of your NTFS partition, do not lose hope just yet -
unless the damage hit a
/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld'
I had searched in vain, I have found no solution.
Could someone help me?
Thank you in advance
PS: Note that I am running ubuntu 4.12 64bit and I'm in the book lfs7.2
I've already written an email, but I did not know that I need to be
registered.
I precise english
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 15:01 +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
I think Ken has pointed me in the right direction - bash links not to
libncurses or libncursesw, but to plain-old libcurses, and I seem to
have missed the commands that create the linker script that redirects
that one. I've just fixed it,
to double-check that.
Sigh... turns out there *was* something significantly wrong with the
linker, which I only discovered on nuking /tools after the build
finished successfully. Installing the chapter 6 binutils into /tools
really doesn't help...
Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
First, check how Bash is linked: readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
interpret. Of course, this should say that it's looking for the dynamic
linker in /lib. Then verify you actually have all the right libraries
for Ncurses: ls -la
On Dec 1, 2012, at 4:59 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
Basically, I'm hoping that someone more familiar than me with the
toolchain can tell me how a chapter 6 package (bash) might be linked
against a library not installed in chapter 6 (the non-wide version of
ncurses). The obvious answer is that it's
On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5:
cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Do you also get the same problem when running /bin/more /sbin/cfdisk
and /usr/bin/cal ?
Those are installed by
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 11:59:07PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
First, check how Bash is linked: readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
interpret. Of course, this should say that it's looking for the dynamic
linker in /lib. Then verify you actually
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:59:07 +1300
Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
First, check how Bash is linked: readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
interpret. Of course, this should say that it's looking for the
dynamic linker in /lib. Then verify
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:19:38 +0100
Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:59:07 +1300
Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 11:17 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
First, check how Bash is linked: readelf -l /bin/bash | grep
interpret. Of
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:24:08 +0100
Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean `ldd /path/to/bash/that/is/the/problem/bash'.
Also, there is an easy way to test if the problem is linking with a
library from /tools. Make a symlink.
ln -sv /usr /tools
Then try it again.
Or maybe
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 16:19 +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
Can you do `ldd /bin/bash'?
Oddly, no. I can't use ldd because that's a shell script depending
on /bin/sh working, but if I run:
/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --list /bin/bash
...I get:
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries:
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 07:27 -0600, William Harrington wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5:
cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Do you also get the same problem when running
Hey guys...
Rewriting my LFS build scripts, I'm getting an interesting linking error
with bash in chapter 6, and am hoping someone can point me in the right
direction for tracking down the cause.
Basically, bash builds correctly, but the resulting binary is bad, any
attempt to invoke it
Hi,
For various reasons, among them, a lot I don't know, lfs has more and
more success in French-speaking users. It's all the more right since
Denis joined the team to maintain blfs up-to-date. Subsequently, we have
more support to do to help french-speaking users who don't speak
English. We have
Richard Melville wrote:
On another subject, and a minor issue, the tzdata package in the
SVN-20120816 build instructions is version e but the package downloaded
from the LFS repository is version c
The best place to get the tz data is
On 12/08/12 21:16, Keiran wrote:
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
not could you please point me in the right direction?
When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
configure: error:
Keiran wrote:
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this
Yes, this is the right list.
When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
configure: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/lto-plugin':
On 12/08/12 21:22, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Keiran wrote:
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this
Yes, this is the right list.
When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
configure: error: in
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:16 PM, Keiran wrote:
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
not could you please point me in the right direction?
When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
amount of Googling has been able to solve it.
On 12/08/12 21:34, William Harrington wrote:
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:16 PM, Keiran wrote:
Hello, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to mail with this, if
not could you please point me in the right direction?
When trying to compile GCC at Chapter 5.5, I get this error, and no
amount of
Keiran wrote:
That tells me that gcc is not installed or binutils wasn't installed
correctly. What is the output of the script in Section iii - Host
System Requirements?
bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22
bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
bzip2, Version 1.0.6,
On 12/08/12 21:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Keiran wrote:
That tells me that gcc is not installed or binutils wasn't installed
correctly. What is the output of the script in Section iii - Host
System Requirements?
bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22
bison
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:37 PM, Keiran wrote:
--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
What happened to your LFS_TGT variable? Are you using the lfs user?
Make sure you are the lfs user and your environment is set up right.
--target should not be your
On 12/08/12 22:14, William Harrington wrote:
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:37 PM, Keiran wrote:
--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
What happened to your LFS_TGT variable? Are you using the lfs user?
Make sure you are the lfs user and your environment is
William Harrington wrote:
On Aug 12, 2012, at 15:37 PM, Keiran wrote:
--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu
What happened to your LFS_TGT variable? Are you using the lfs user?
Make sure you are the lfs user and your environment is set up right.
another build
directory with some other name.
What should i do..?
Please help...urgent..
Thanking you,
Regards
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Did you run
directory again. Should i remove
the previous gcc-build and build it again or create another build
directory with some other name.
What should i do..?
Please help...urgent..
Thanking you,
Regards
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
I am not getting any output while running the program dummy.c after
GCC pass2 installation.
Also it says that create gcc-build directory again. Should i remove
the previous gcc-build and build it again or create another build
directory with some other name.
What should i do..?
Please help
I've been managing to get more consistent results in VirtualBox.
Boot Issues? Mostly were Grub2 Related, and getting more familiar
with it has help tremendously. However as I learned more, I
couldn't help but wonder why CentOS6 needs such a CRAZY startup
string. They must not use the KISS
Kevin Wise, Bruce Dubbs, Matjn
Thank you for all your responses...
What I from all that is I need to backtrack and just double and triple
check all my steps again. I have seen and try to do all the steps - but
I'm missing a few surely.
Thank you for your feedback! And as one of ya encouraged:
: donderdag 15 december 2011 18:51
Aan: LFS Support List
Onderwerp: Re: [lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure:
error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header
On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote:
Guess I overlooked The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later.
So
On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote:
Guess I overlooked The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later.
So what liveCD should I use then?
Met vriendelijke groet,
Henk
Just download any fairly recent distro...Fedora, Ubuntu, etc...and if
needed install whatever additional
Guess I overlooked The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or
later.
So what liveCD should I use then?
There's the gentoo live dvd available at the bottom of this page:
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml
it has current up-to-date tools to build LFS.
Alain
--
Configure stops with error:
configureL error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header
Host Proc Arch = i686
Gcc -version = 4.1.2
Cupid.h is in /mnt/lfs/tools/lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.6.1/include/cupid.h
What do I need to do to fix this?
--
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:04:32 +0100
Henk Teijema h.teij...@genetwister.nl wrote:
Configure stops with error:
configureL error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header
Host Proc Arch = i686
Gcc -version = 4.1.2
Cupid.h is in
-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure:
error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:04:32 +0100
Henk Teijema h.teij...@genetwister.nl wrote:
Configure stops with error:
configureL error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header
Host Proc Arch
Henk Teijema wrote:
Nope did not forget that one
In other news groups I read that gcc is a too old version.
Use gcc 4.1.2 from the LFS liveCD 6.3
The trick to copy the cupid.h to /usr/include results in:
checking installed Linux kernel header files... TOO OLD!
Have you seen:
Hi,
ext4 is currently limited to 16tb, and you're looking for 18 if I
understood right. Only very recent packages have lifted the 16tb limit.
- Lauri
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders
wherever you are
--
: woensdag 14 december 2011 19:09
Aan: LFS Support List
Onderwerp: Re: [lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure:
error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header
Henk Teijema wrote:
Nope did not forget that one
In other news groups I read that gcc is a too old version.
Use gcc 4.1.2
to be related to ld or any
other single tool from binutils, but I don't know if it's safe to ignore
these errors. Any help or ideas on what I can look for will be greatly
appreciated.
My host system is an old laptop with a Pentium M processor running Red Hat
6.0 beta. My LFS system is on its own hard 100GB
On 09/25/2011 10:44 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
[putolin]
I'm lost here (probably because it is late) - you've used the same
host to build LFS twice, first on the old disk, and then on the new
disk ?
Yes that is correct. The scripts produced a LFS system that booted and
worked on the old hard
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new
LFS system.
The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of:
[ 1.433897] Freeing unused kernel memory: 400k freed
It stops there and a hard reset is required.
What is the next step in the boot process.
The new LFS
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400
scrat baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new
LFS system.
The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of:
[ 1.433897] Freeing unused kernel memory: 400k freed
It stops there and
On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400
scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new
LFS system.
The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of:
[ 1.433897] Freeing unused
scrat wrote:
On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400
scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new
LFS system.
The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of:
[ 1.433897]
On 09/25/2011 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
scrat wrote:
On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400
scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new
LFS system.
The kernel appears to load
@linuxfromscratch.org
Reply-To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: Need Help - boot fails
On 09/25/2011 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
scrat wrote:
On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400
scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:56:28PM -0400, scrat wrote:
snip
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new
LFS system.
The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of:
[ 1.433897] Freeing unused kernel memory: 400k freed
It stops there and a
I think I may have found the error of my ways
I am building for i686
When reviewing my build process logs I found this under Chapter 6.16
GCC-4.5.2...
When doing the compile test ie echo main(){} dummy.c...etc.
From the book:
Next, verify that the new linker is being used with the correct
are using it, I suggest that you build an alternative kernel without
it, and use that to help identify where your problem lies. Equally,
even just using a framebuffer might cause problems (on my new
server, I had to fiddle with grub.conf to get a non-blank screen,
and I eventually switched to, I think
upgrades on some hardware (particularly, intel). So, if you
are using it, I suggest that you build an alternative kernel without
it, and use that to help identify where your problem lies. Equally,
even just using a framebuffer might cause problems (on my new
server, I had to fiddle with grub.conf
it, and use that to help identify where your problem lies. Equally,
even just using a framebuffer might cause problems (on my new
server, I had to fiddle with grub.conf to get a non-blank screen,
and I eventually switched to, I think, vesdafb from radeonfb - on
earlier kernels with my previosu
bsquared wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend some resources for troubleshooting a kernel panic.
I have been built LFS 6.8 on a USB stick, and moved it to a disk
partition using 'dd'. I modified the grub.cfg file and rebooted.
Then got a kernel panic.
Doh! I forgot that I changed the root
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:34 AM, bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
bsquared wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend some resources for troubleshooting a kernel panic.
I have been built LFS 6.8 on a USB stick, and moved it to a disk
partition using 'dd'. I modified the grub.cfg file and
1 - 100 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
