autoboot it stopped there.
I've had much more success, sadly, with RHEL4 but it isn't using GRUB
but lilo on the CD image. The kernel loads and it enters the installer
but either it is hung or the keyboard isn't functional.
--
Darren J Moffat
with the language the UI is implemented in.
Ineeded all of the slowness in SMC can be attributed to how it was
designed and implemented, the fact that it is Java is irrelevant.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, how do you do this on 1000 Macs?
Remote AppleScript.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to come up or not I think it depends
on the individual components, the processes certainly need to run.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
team.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Lars C wrote:
I think that a significant donation by Sun would not only help the OpenBSD
project
in sustaining the development of OpenSSH, but would also be a good public
relations opportunity.
Sun already has in the past made donations both to OpenSSH and to OpenBSD.
--
Darren J Moffat
are installed. This is due to the way that the
cipher suites are hardcoded in the code base.
I really hope that all the IMPORT restrictions have gone now and I
will be able to finish off the project to remove SUNWcry/SUNWcryr and
have us just ship full strength crypto all the time.
--
Darren J Moffat
).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. Note though that if it used wget there would still be
a requirement for OpenSSL for use by wget.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is
this problem dealt with on systems like that ?
On the flip side of this having OpenSSL in /usr/sfw has lead
a lot of people to think that we don't ship it or don't support it.
The hiding in /usr/sfw was never a good idea and we all know
that now.
--
Darren J Moffat
Solaris needed to use things like OpenSSL itself hence the External
taxonomy - which means The OpenSolaris community isn't in control of
the evolution of this interface and it may break in any type of release.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss
know know was a bad idea.
BTW the FHS is practically a total rip off of SRV4 and Solaris did,
especially evident in the share directories some that that Sun (IIRC)
created for saving diskspace on servers hosting diskless clients of
mixed architectures.
--
Darren J Moffat
terminology these days too.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
community.
For the copyig files bit see filesync(1) - been in Solaris since
5.7.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
this:
# while true ; do
modunload -i 0
sleep 60
done
:-)
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James Carlson wrote:
Darren J Moffat writes:
Yann POUPET wrote:
Minix3 pings its driver modules to see if they're still alive. If not, the
driver is reloaded.
The DEBUG kernel, the default for an ONNV build of the OpenSolaris
source drops at the moment, does essentially this already
then it there isn't actually a single stability we can give to
all of libc which is why we have per symbol versioning.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
that actually change about this cached data ?
tuning to download the entire directory service (such as ou=people), but
that could be driven externally.
Some mail clients already support that.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
but some network drivers are and the drivers
for the crypto hardware are.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, but it wasn't clear to me where the line was being drawn.
FMA certainly helps if the driver is aware of hardware faults and
does the FMA thing with them. If we are talking about bad kernel
software then I agree I don't see a solution for that at the moment.
--
Darren J Moffat
on the delegation model
of NFSv4.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Gregory Shaw wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 10:25, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Gregory Shaw wrote:
Actually, what NWAM is talking about it network roaming profiles.
NWAM is more than just roaming profiles it is a complete redesign
of how we bring up networking and core network services.
What I'm
be published on opensolaris.org site ?
Yes, ideally almost very case should be published but the infrastructure
to do it automatically isn't in place yet.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
build closes on Tuesday.
There may well be a source code drop for ON before that ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
want to add any free/open source software into a Sun product.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Bill Rushmore wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Basically I'm saying it isn't that easy you must consult a real
lawyer. We inside Sun have to consult a lawyer every time we
want to add any free/open source software into a Sun product.
That is completely unrealistic
will be able to benefit from crypto (unlike changing the compression
algorithm).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to lofi(7d) and lofiadm(1m).
Project alias: yes please [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
it means
something bad in other languages).
Community: Approachability.
Seconded and I'd like to keep the Tamarack name (I'm not aware
of it being offensive but then I only speak variants of English).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
the project exists in opensolaris.org land.
However I can say that there is a hard requirement that addition
of encryption will not break things, ie the on disk format.
There has been sufficient padding left for this.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss
the script.
Am I mistaken??
Why not read the source and find out ?
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/cmd/cron/cron.c#1926
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Can we take this HARDWARE thread to a new forum please. Maybe
we need [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, thanks.
Darren
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Wyllys Ingersoll wrote:
I would like to bring a new project to OpenSolaris.org.
The project is called Key Management Framework (KMF).
I'll second that.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
tuned specifically for doing RSA/DSA/D-H.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Application management to me suggests things like GNOMEs gconf
or SMF, ie management of the applications and there configuration
rather than installation.
Why not just call this Install if we are going for a generic
name.
--
Darren J Moffat
that this be a multi phase delivery project and
when each phase (I envisage 3 at the moment but that could change
based on consensus) we would determine if continuing as a project
makes sense or if this is just rolled into the ZFS community as
a whole.
--
Darren J Moffat
names are hard and
they tend to stick.
Lets just go with the name the original proposer suggested and
get let the project team get down to work.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for it would help, ie what kind of service or
application are you building on top of it.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and some status.
Even doing this once a month will be quite a bit of time but I
think it is doable.
Anyone else interested in an OpenSolaris podcast ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to be proven wrong on that though.
However I can't really come up with a better suggestion.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
source via the Helix project. I'm
not sure if all of it is or not (probably some codecs are binary only).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
word
play by me is all those comments are, quoting them out of context
or making slashdot/osnews/etc stories out of them is not permitted
without full attribution and context including this paragraph.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
how to deal with the flag day or that the source
was held back ? [ no need to answer I know what the answer is ].
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
:-)
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Julian Ortiz wrote:
This is the error msg i-m getting.
bash-3.00# mount -F pcfs -o rw,hidden /dev/rdsk/c1d0p2 /export/home/fat32/
Change that to /dev/dsk/c1d0p2
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris
related ones
to do with patching) that caused the creation of the per build
snapshots of the ON gate.
As long as the source drops are clearly labeled as build snapshots
or nightly drops it should be fine.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
source code
available from opensolaris.org plus other stuff.
Its a rolling Alpha/Beta program if you like.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Solaris ?
For getting the best experience use both (and other systems too).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
by prodreg is kind of like a
meta package set.
prodreg has been around for a while, its use is not mandatory.
The idea is to give the administrator a higher level or abstraction
than raw packages.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
ZFS be as well. Lets not rehash
that discussion though.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Search for WAN boot on docs.sun.com.
Unfortunately this is SPARC only just now and depends on
OBP support for the security of the initial kernel image. Now
that we have newboot for x86/x64 it could be done there are well.
--
Darren J Moffat
(though I don't
know when since I'm not involved).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 12:54, Zhisong Jin wrote:
the goal here is to limit backup clients having access only to the
non-root zone for security concerns. does it make sense?
Yes and the best way to achieve that is to do the backup from
the global zone in my opinion.
--
Darren J Moffat
transformed all the packages into stream format it might
be fairly easy to hack up a distro of OpenSolaris that did pkgadd over
https.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
it part of Solaris (neither is its partner in crime SAM-FS) so
even if it were to be open sourced I doubt this would necessarily
be the place we would see it show up (though it could be).
Joerg was there something in particular about QFS you were interested in
? If so what ?
--
Darren J Moffat
opensolaris.org, or choose to run with a broken PAM
implementation by using the current bits from OpenSSH.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and a proposal I wouldn't
help them out - because I would (even if I don't personally agree with
the suggestion).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
because you need to have something to key off
the bugs in the peer implementation.
Why is it that knowing that it is OpenSSH at a specific version and
patch level is okay but knowing that it is Sun's specific version and
patch level is not ?
--
Darren J Moffat
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060104 14:38]:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
Support for gziped or bzip2ed
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:49, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the man page:
-d device
Install or copy a package from device. device can be a
full path name to a directory or the identifiers for
tape, floppy
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:57, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:49, Richard Lowe wrote:
You're right though, it doesn't appear to be documented in pkgadd(1M),
or anywhere else I can find.
It is documented as the last sentence
^^^
be a URL pointing to a datastream created by pkgtrans.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
be signed see this URL
for more info on that:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1985/6mhm8o5t9?a=view
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the Solaris PKCS#11 stuff) have
never seen a bug or mention of this before. This is the first time
I have been made a ware of this.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
as expected) it has I18N/L10N support
and BSM audit support.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 10:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still seeing it. (Build 30 + build 30 crypto packages)
On my system it's logged to /var/log/authlog (log level auth.info).
Which bug number did you log for this because I can't find it.
--
Darren J Moffat
logged 6368332.
Patch attached if you can't wait until this gets integrated for a
fix.
--
Darren J Moffat
--- usr/src/lib/pkcs11/libpkcs11/common/pkcs11Conf.c ---
Index: usr/src/lib/pkcs11/libpkcs11/common/pkcs11Conf.c
--- /ws/onnv-clone/usr/src/lib/pkcs11/libpkcs11/common/pkcs11Conf.c
.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
proposing.
Comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by Jan 13th (longer than
I'd normally set for such a small doc update but it is holiday season).
Note this was Bcc'd to opensolaris-discuss and docs-discuss please
honour the followup and post comments security-discuss.
--
Darren J Moffat
Standards
(1) ?
I agree that rbac(5) as a man page is near useless, I've been
attempting to rewrite it for a while now and I'm almost finished
with it and I'll be submitting my changes as a man page bug soon.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
it to the list for comment?
Good idea, note though that I will be posting it to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOT opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 17:35, Sh wrote:
Well, my aim is to understand how to unload module without modunload,
but why ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
dns/client online.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
can
also cause the module unload to happen in some cases but I'm not sure on
the details.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
) on it. See the source for the cryptoadm module in
OpenSolaris as a recently created example of this.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
it is fairly core code now.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
or filesystem or device ?
Sounds like you really want to join the ZFS crypto project when it
starts up for real. I'll be posting some draft requirements/features
and notes I have soon.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
for their backup
software that you have for your archiver, I'm pretty sure they will just
make the change.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
relationship between Solaris and OpenSolaris.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
in
the future (can't say when yet though).
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
solve it for all cases
and I really wish we hadn't dumped GNOME stuff in /usr/bin: 899 things
in /usr/bin on my snv_27 system. However GNOME isn't really the biggest
culprit there SUNWcsu alone drops 302 things into /usr/bin.
--
Darren J Moffat
data on a file.
In that case yes we can do that see openat(2) for how to do it.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
this is slightly
tricker for CD/DVD writers as the device node alone doesn't tell
you what it is.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
of security since the info is available
from arp(1) anyway and with the introduction of IPv6 it is so often
trivial to work it out from the IPv6 link local address anyway :-)
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 17:13, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have an encrypt(1) command that works on individual files.
We have encryption support for lofi(7d) - the block driver - working
and hope to release it to OpenSolaris site soon
on in
their development process so this has actually be though about in
advance and isn't a layer on top. It just wasn't a ZFS Phase I
requirement.
Check out the OpenSolaris Security Community at:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/security/
--
Darren J Moffat
best moved to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it is the ARC forum where we have
traditionally had discussions like this at Sun.
Best to join that alias and start a fresh thread there rather than
continuing as a sub topic on the forking thread.
--
Darren J Moffat
:-)
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
actually want live upgrade to copy
the core and crash files over to the new boot environment, because
they aren't relevant. Sometimes I just use dumpadm and coreadm
to send them to a filesystem shared between all BEs.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 16:21, Matthew Simmons wrote:
DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes:
DJM I also tend to have /var/core and /var/crash separate as well but
DJM thats because I don't actually want live upgrade to copy the core and
DJM crash files over to the new boot
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 16:43, Matthew Simmons wrote:
DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes:
DJM I use to do that but if using dumpadm and coreadm to actually put
them
DJM else where seemed like a better solution to me - mainly because they
DJM have the functionality built in so
implementation already exists is making gross assumptions
and hasn't actually looked at the code and tried it.
BTW if you read the archives on the Helix site you can see all
the threads of discussion on this.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss
.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
mean you won't need elfsign/libelfsign/kcfd from the closed
bins. Kcfd does have another use but you can live without it in
almost all cases - certainly all single CPU cases and the only
difference in multiple CPU cases is a potential drop in performance
under very heavy crypto load.
--
Darren J
a TAR archive and
installing the files from the PKG archive manually is a
highly complex task (need to chmod +x many files and install
many symlinks manually).
Go here: http://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp
Thats a non pkgadd version.
--
Darren J Moffat
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 12:02, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 21:39, Joerg Schilling wrote:
- In order to compile OpenSolaris we need a java compiler.
The solution is to install the javacompiler. Unfortunately
this cannot
be best based on number of CPUS and speed.
I have my ~/.make.machines just be a symlink to /.make.machines.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
..
Start with ipcs(1)
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
volume management
frameworks. Running bsmconv(1m) will not have any impact on LVM, unless
you were trying to build RAID devices our of removable media.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
401 - 500 of 528 matches
Mail list logo
