enstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSefOGbzWVl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re
: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpmE5ZvqXlkY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development M
ent Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpkIr4COquU9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp0yyprOQl7a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.ope
a bit?
It's true that the more deployments there are, the easier it is to
trust a project's maturity but I'd be worry about people considering
that the only metric and not giving new projects a chance.
Fla
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flav
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
gt;
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ope
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp8zLSt5GCB2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
r usage
questions)
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
+1 on both proposals: rotation is definitely a step in right direction.
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 a
be
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoc
On 24/02/15 08:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 24/02/15 04:38 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose the following members to become part of the Glance core
team:
Ian Cordasco
Louis Taylor
Mike Fedosin
Hemanth Makkapati
Please, yes!
Actually - I hope this doesn&#
rward.
Glance core team members please vote +1 or -1 to the nominations either in
reply or by private communication. Please reply by Thursday 17UTC; we shall
close the voting before that if everyone replies.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpqsCL6T5yLm.pgp
Description: PGP sign
stand is why
part of our community needed a private IRC channel for "core
reviewers" to hangout together. For the later, I don't think there's a
use case.
I'm not arguing on the general use case for a private IRC channel, I'm
arguing on the need of such channels for a s
nd a login (to hide them
from spam harvesters).
Thoughts?
I've proposed this several times already and I still think some
consistency here is worth it. I'd vote to enable logging on all
channels.
Fla.
P.S: Join the open side of the force #badumps
t for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list
ns)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpG0w9koZfZg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Open
blem with the HTTP
store is that we have basically no control over it and that is
worrisome from a security and implementation perspective.
Flavio
Frankly, it shouldn't add that much code. I feel we can make it clean if we
leverage the different Python modules (httplib etc.)
Regards,
Jord
ment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpjSAiiBxRsN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
anything I can do to help?
I'd say, feel free to propose a patch to remove it. Please, file a bug
for this so we can track it.
Thanks,
Flavio
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/02/15 09:34 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
Yeah, that commit defi
ubject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpGzwquQzdzL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsu
at project team continue work on all "abandoned" patches that are
covering
valid use cases and finish them?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/02/15 11:06 +, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
Hi all,
We h
s for bringing this up,
Flavio
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/02/15 13:42 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
I recently proposed a change to glance to turn the file-backed scrubber
queue
files into JSON: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145223/
t's be smart on this. Flexibility is good on holiday seasons, during
feature freeze, etc.
+2 to the above, I like it.
Thanks again,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp4MX9MUQ9fE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Open
?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpMnOREag89a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
On 12/02/15 12:04 +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
The important bit, thoguh, is that email is meant for asynchronous
communication and IRC isn't. If things that require the intervention
of other folks from the community are being discussed and those
On 11/02/15 11:24 +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
During the last two cycles, I've had the feeling that some of the
things I love the most about this community are degrading and moving
to a state that I personally disagree with. With the hope of seeing
27;s a very bad
| habit. if you have a private channel you hangout there, you'll read that
| channel, share jokes on that and will eventually throw in there topics to
| discuss that are perfectly safe to discuss publicly.
Stefano, I agree. Private conversations should be the norm. And private
co
On 12/02/15 01:41 -0800, Nikhil Manchanda wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
## Keep discussions open
I don't believe there's anything wrong about kicking off some
discussions in private channels about specs/bugs. I don't believe
there'
___
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio
On 11/02/15 09:37 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Stefano Maffulli's message of 2015-02-11 06:14:39 -0800:
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 10:55 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> This email is dedicated to the openness of our community/project.
It's good to have a reminder every now an
very offensive that
people that have been longer in this community do the opposite of what
I've been encouraging the participants of these programs to do. That
is, having the courage to participate in public discussion and
engaging with the commu
f our community and encourage everyone to make that a must
have thing in each sub-community. You don't need to be core-reviewer or
PTL to do so. Speak up and help keeping the community as open as possible.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
Thanks Flavio!
I'd like to add cou
ubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpr_gMfrvih_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: o
r thoughts. This is worth discussing and
fighting for.
All the above being said, I'd like to thank everyone who fights for
the openness of our community and encourage everyone to make that a
must have thing in each sub-
or usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp7v874u54Bf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/c
On 14/01/15 05:46 -0700, Boden Russell wrote:
On 1/14/15 1:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/01/15 21:24 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 01/13/2015 04:55 PM, Boden Russell wrote:
Looking for some feedback from the glance dev team on a potential BP…
This is the solution that I would recommend
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.o
@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpv3A6hG5r81.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Li
ns)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpQWSgWiNTyI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Deve
infra team, requirement's cores, etc.
What python-clients are you referring to? Are you referring to libs
that live in stackforge or dependencies for things that live in
stackforge?
Do you have an (or many) example?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgps2sjt5rSu5.pgp
Description: PGP sign
On 09/01/15 15:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[huge snip]
What do you think ? Could that work ? If not, do you have alternate
suggestions ?
Love it! Thanks for the thoughtful and detailed email.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2LB9GMnSpn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ist (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging
It's also important to remember that IRC channels are typically not
private and are likely already logged by dozens of people anyway.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Aedo mailto:ca...@mirantis.com&g
community's transparency and make our
development discussions publicly accessible to contributors in all
time-zones and from other projects. It is very useful to look back on
the logs for previous discussions or as well as to refer people to
discussions or questions previously answered.
+2
Than
On 19/12/14 09:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 19, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
DISCLAIMER: The following comments are neither finger pointing the
author of this work nor the keystone team.
RANT: We should really stop assuming everyone is using a global `CONF
https://github.com/openstack/python-keystoneclient/blob/41afe3c963fa01f61b67c44e572eee34b0972382/keystoneclient/auth/conf.py#L49
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware/blob/master/keystonemiddleware/auth_token.py#L356
[3] https://review.openstack.org/143063
--
@flaper87
Flav
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpOyzMXNqoky.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
__
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpR5xEchxz6w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenSt
point release.
+2 on the requirements revert.
I just read this and I agree.
The same thing applies for the cap planned for glance_store, which I
had already -2'd.
Cheers,
Fla
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpXnms9xJcPt.pgp
Description: PGP
compatible, but not sure about forcing version bump on stable
https://review.openstack.org/137862 - Disable osprofiler by default to
prevent upgrade issues, disabled by default in other services
+2 to both
[snip]
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgprfgIIZkiMY.pgp
Description: PGP
//lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1egx0cInqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ought I'd also provide
feedback on your email.
Thanks,
Flavio
G'luck,
Peter
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
week.
Thanks for your consideration and the hard work, Erno and Alex!
+2A
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpD0rOoQ2Ei4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/ma
it quite a bit,
make it easier for contributors to join in, and seems consistent with
the direction of OpenStack as a whole.
Lets get rid of it, once and for all.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpYWQLd7puPx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenSt
On 21/11/14 14:13 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Nov 21, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/11/14 12:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
We have a bit of a backlog in the Oslo review queue. Before we add a bunch of
new reviews for Kilo work, I’d like to see if we can clear some of
people could/would participate in a review day like this on 4 December?
I'll probably be AFK on December 4th and 5th, can it be on December
3rd ?
Either way, I'm in. I'll do my best to be there on the 4th if it can't
be changed.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
es of
cross-project issues on the agenda. Let me know on this thread if that
sounds like a good idea, and we'll make the final call at next week
meeting :)
+1 :-)
This sounds like a good idea.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5ulVWt7car.pgp
Description: PGP
adoption be listed there?
I've a spec[0] for glanceclient and I'll work on the glance_store one
now.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133485/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpmPWgBJiwpY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ope
/doodle.com/nwc26k8satuyvvmz
Thanks,
-Nikhil
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2FcMW9czH6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpn13I7KvWyK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
nder's
API but has access to the volumes.
Unfortunately, this is not possible now and I don't think it'll be
possible until L (or even M?).
FWIW, I think the use case you've mentioned is useful and it's
something we have in our TODO list.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flape
On 18/11/14 18:46 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 18/11/14 11:42 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
With storyboard.openstack.org <http://storyboard.openstack.org> looming
on the horizon, should such an effort be put on the back burner for now?
I don't expect
pt
it for OpenStack projects.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5tTZfl8cnC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
io
[0] http://qpid.apache.org/
[1] http://qpid.apache.org/components/cpp-broker/index.html
[2] http://qpid.apache.org/components/dispatch-router/index.html
[3] http://qpid.apache.org/components/messenger/index.html
[4] http://qpid.apache.org/components/protocol-engine/index.html
--
@flaper87
Flav
nough state that would a low smaller projects - zaqar
- to jump in and help testing the storyboard? I'm happy to give it a
try.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpIegOxUfxSz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing li
thout having to do a "call for volunteers" every meeting/cycle/etc
The above doesn't solve the problme completely but just like reviews,
it'd be an optional, completely opt-in process that people can sign up
for.
Thoughts?
Flavio
[0] https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2
.
[0]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134015/2/specs/kilo/migrate-to-topics.rst,cm
[1] http://blog.flaper87.com/post/people-dont-like-to-queue-up/
Thoughts? Feedback?
Thanks in advance,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpvnbHdHMkNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpW7NsATDPbZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
this up and for updating your patches, I know it's
a pain and I appreciate your collaboration there.
Cheers,
Flavio
P.S: Gentle note. Oslo is not an acronym.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHpum198hgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStac
guidelines below.
Here's our commit message guideline:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages
Thanks for all the hard work,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp3F148Kw5Pg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Ope
Thanks for joining our sessions last week,
Looking forward for the upcoming and already promissing 6 months,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgprXb1RgMatt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstac
- answer to that is that we once thought
about not using oslo.config in oslo.messaging.
Looking forward to have more feedback on this point, I unfortunately
missed this session because I had to attend another one.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Perc
that you'd like
to discuss during the meeting.
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Zaqar
Looking forward to see you there,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpb1AB4BYQS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Ope
On 11/11/14 11:45 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/11/14 11:06 +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1391437 and marked it as Critical.
ok, so current issue is a bug for both master and stable/juno but I'd
still like glance_store backward compatibility be clar
o* changes when the library was created.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSiUeIcuJD6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
more robust, glance library. Did I
understand correctly?
Or, are you suggesting to get rid of glance's API entirely and instead
have it in the form of a library and everything would be handled by
the middleware you have in your diagram?
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@
ck-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openst
On 30/10/14 12:25 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 10/23/2014 04:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Oct 23, 2014, at 2:56 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The application projects are dropping python 2.6 support during Kilo, and I’ve
had several people ask
ne!
Flavio
On 29 October 2014 10:04, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 28/10/14 21:23 +0100, Philip Cheong wrote:
Hi all,
In preparation of the OpenStack Summit in Paris next week, I'm hoping
to speak
to some people in the OpenStack foundation about the benefits
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpJKR8bOPu2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev maili
On 10/24/2014 03:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> On 09:11 Thu 23 Oct , Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> According to the use-cases explained in this thread (also in the emails
>> from John and Mathieu) this is something that'd be good having. I'm
>> looking forward to seeing
never the stable branch
> management team decides the final 2014.2.x point release is, which I
> don't think has been settled quite yet).
>
Agreed! I think this is a safer and easier way to drop support for py26
in Oslo. Otherwise, I think we'll have to fight with backports, pinn
not caught in the gate because we're not testing
multi-tenant upload there, right? Any chance we can enable this?
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 10/23/2014 08:56 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 08:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> The application projects are dropping python 2.6 support during Kilo, and
>> I’ve had several people ask recently about what this means for Oslo. Because
>> we create libraries
On 10/22/2014 04:46 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
> Replied in inline.
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
e (without py2.6
support except for Oslo) and Juno will be in security maintenance (with
py2.6 support).
I guess the TL;DR of what I'm proposing is to keep 2.6 support in oslo
until we move the rest of the projects just to keep the process simpler.
Probably longer but hopefully simpler.
I'
t; (and lead it, I hope), and the eNovance guys who also work on ceilometer to
> be there for the Python 3 session.
>
> If you know you have a conflict with one of these times, let me know and I’ll
> see if we can juggle a little.
>
> Doug
>
>
> ___
> OpenSt
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged
>> in Glance to provide an easier and hopefully more
;d like to
propose getting rid of it - with a deprecation period, I guess - and
giving it another chance in the future when it can be fully implemented.
[0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/glance-cinder-driver
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32864/
C
since I'll be traveling. The second reason is that in our second time
slot, we can also have Fei Long joining us.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Zaqar#Next_meeting
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailin
testing for software which currently has it no matter
>> how fragile. This is mainly a call for help to anyone with some
>> background and/or interest in python-glanceclient's unit tests to
>> get them working under Python 3.4, so that we can eliminate the
>
7;ll need to document this and make this part of the contract for
drivers implementations.
Thanks for bringing it up,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
e ends.
>
Agreed with Doug. It's not really a strong requirement. The request of
the liaison to be a core reviewer is more a suggestion for the projects
themselves in order to make the interaction between both teams easier.
That said, we could probably re-word that somehow to reflect the above.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 10/06/2014 08:58 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 12:38 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 10/03/2014 12:16 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2014 05:38 PM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
>>>> Candidate proposals for the Technical Committee positions (6 positions)
>
write documentation along the patch will help writing
> better code, having a better understanding of what the patch does for
> reviewers, etc…
>
> And will obviously benefit to users and operators.
>
This is a matter of making reviewers aware of this issue. As much as we
want to m
discussion is in their candidacy.
As a voter, I'm interested to know how the new candidates see our
governance model in the next 6 months and what changes, related to the
"big tent" discussion, they consider most important.
Thanks,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
6:52 +0200
From: Flavio Percoco
Reply-To: fla...@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
To: openst...@lists.openstack.org
Greetings,
I'm reaching out to see if anyone is using Glance's GridFS store driver
and has any feedback. The driver has been updated with the latest API
changes but no f
701 - 800 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
