On 20/7/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Ds Slimming Filter.
You're kidding?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 21/7/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have had the cash under my mattress (I put it there so it doesn't burn
a hole
in my pocket, plus it's winter here) ready to slam down on the virtual
camera
shop counter for a nice high spec Pentax DSLR for quite a while. I don't
know
how
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/21 Thu AM 06:42:20 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Features I use (formerly the Nine Second Difference)
On 20/7/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Ds Slimming Filter.
You're kidding?
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Very nice Jim,
I like the first one the most by a long way.
I find myself wanting to move my head to the right to peer round the
tree on the left. (This adds a little mystery.) Same for the sneak
view of the building (am left wanting to know more of what
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
well, everyone seems to be in on it then, since individual companies seem to
forecast around the same total, as do industry groups, at about 3.6M total
for the coming year.
shrug Forecast is forecast - i.e. guess work. Maybe an educated guess,
but
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Polarizer
ISO 400, 1/125 sec @ f/13, handheld
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0331.htm
Get yourself a bigger camera, Bruce :)
Cheers,
- Dave
Rob Studdert wrote on 21.07.05 3:17:
You have a very positive outlook, that's nice but I'm betting you're wrong.
Hi Rob :-)
Pål is not that wrong. I remember an official report from Japan where indeed
Pentax had about 40% of MF market share in this country. On the other side
they had about 10%
Are you telling me to switch to Canon? grin
I used to shoot 67II's. I think Bill Robb is trying to push me toward
4X5.
Thanks for the off handed compliment - I think...
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:35:34 AM, you wrote:
DM On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Bruce Dayton
You've got some great shots from that trip, Bruce. Keep 'em coming.
John
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:57:39 +0100, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another not so common site in Monument Valley. From my
recollection, this area had a whole bunch of rocks fall down. So
there is
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Juan Buhler wrote:
- Set the camera to P
- Dial the aperture I want
- Set the exposure compensation in the camera so it will overexpose by
as many stops as the difference between my selected aperture and the
maximum aperture of the lens.
snip
Anyone here using K or M
No, probably not but I wonder if Floyd (pink or otherwise) ever got as many
great animal shots as Jerome...
And Jerome was one of two PDML members who knew where my old house
wasI've moved now ;)
Cory
wonders what changes/additions were made to BOZ'z site.
- Original Message -
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Mat Maessen wrote:
Yeesh, even I'm hitting a Wall here.
That's because you are on the Dark Side of the Moon, or you would have
seen it. Just a little pin-prick. There 'll be no more Ahh!, but you
may feel a little sick. Can you stand up? I do believe it's working
good.
Hello, Doug ...
[Original Message]
From: Doug Brewer
Nevertheless, it was more effort than just having to turn on the
feature.
Yes, it was more effort than just having to turn on the feature. However,
I'll say it again, I'd not go out and BUY a camera for such a feature. I
was
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
they didn't want cheaper access to the Sony sensors they use in their
cameras? how smart is that?
Depends on whether they are setting up their own FAB.
Kostas
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0507/05072005benq_e510e520.asp
The SMC system, which was developed in 1971, is suppoed (sic) to
effectively eliminate surface reflection and flares and deliver
sharper and clearer images.
Supposed? F O.
Kostas
I was thinking that just the other day, although I'm not sure you'd want to
take the time to work as slowly and carry as much weight and equipment
needed to do that. Still, there have been several photos of yours where it
was clear that a 4x5 would have provided better results.
I was
Could you provide the link? Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Charles Braswell Jr
Shel Belinkoff
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:59:56 -0700
There is a program available for download or use on line that will cull
the
negative feedbacks from the list of all feedbacks. I can no longer
On 21 Jul 2005 at 9:42, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote on 21.07.05 3:17:
You have a very positive outlook, that's nice but I'm betting you're wrong.
Hi Rob :-)
Pål is not that wrong. I remember an official report from Japan where indeed
Pentax had about 40% of MF market
Susan put up a mini gallery from the recent PDML meet:
I started a gallery !! No telling where this will lead. Soon fame and
fortune may follow.
Tom, here's the URL. I'm sending it to Rick but I don't know how to
show the others who were on the trip. If you have their e mail, you're
Scott Loveless wrote:
I picked up this kit locally for quite a bit less than the BH price.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlistA=detailsQ=sku=353327is=REGaddedTroughType=search
I primarily got it because my wife wanted a leg set that would allow
mounting the center
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:14:36 +0200, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0507/05072005benq_e510e520.asp
The SMC system, which was developed in 1971, is suppoed (sic) to
effectively eliminate surface reflection
the Evolt has the reputation of the street shooter's DSLR of choice. maybe
that's not enough to sell very many, but that's what has been said.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 12:14 AM
forecast is something to look back on and see if the company knew what it
was doing.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
shrug Forecast is forecast
the domestic market is politically important but financially not unless
Pentax depends only on the medium format cameras for its camera profits.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:42 AM
Toyota and Honda, not to mention everyone else other than Ford and GM in the
US seem to be able to do it. what does that tell you about Ford and GM?
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Lawrence Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:34 AM
I like this. You might try painting a tiny catch light in each eye.
They should be white and just a shade less bright than the brightest
white in the shot. Make them slightly irregular and centered. They
should be a little less sharp than the facial details. Make the one in
the close eye
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/21 Thu AM 09:14:36 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax sells lenses on OEM basis
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0507/05072005benq_e510e520.asp
The SMC system, which
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Here is a follow up attempt which I think will be the last one so that I
won't be too imposing here...
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=203388
Further clarification: I *really* like this shot. A great example of how
breaking the
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Polarizer
ISO 400, 1/125 sec @ f/13, handheld
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0331.htm
Get yourself a bigger camera, Bruce :)
Get one for me while you're at it. :p
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, get two their small...
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:57 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On the D you also have the option of holding the
DOF lever in which
gives you continuous stop
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Working with a Leica, and other RF cameras, you get pretty good at
visualizing DoF. I used to use it a lot in the Spottie days, and I really
like the feature for times it's needed, but these days it's not needed too
often, plus it slows down getting the shot.
Shel
I
On 7/20/05, Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
It means canine asylum, hostel, leave him here for
some money, I don't know the exact translation.
Thanks for comments
Regards
Okay, that makes sense. Some sort of a doggie hotel or something. I
was afraid that it was a dog
On 7/21/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another not so common site in Monument Valley. From my
recollection, this area had a whole bunch of rocks fall down. So
there is quite a bit of broken and jumbled sandstone laying around.
Some of it, like this one, have very
keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could never get excited about DOF review, because my eyes would
accommodate so well (I guess) I found it hard to tell where the
demarcation was between IN and OUT of focus.
Of course, there is no such sharp line, but...using the lens
aperture-closing feature
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax DSLR and
a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I tested the
concept. Here are the results. You decide how close the two lenses are to
being equivalent.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/2818.html
Shel
Heading to Wisconsin tomorrow.
My grandmother passed away. Funeral Sat.
Chat later. Bye.
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
The hex-plate has a textured rubber grip. It seems to work fine.
Unfortunately, the holes in the plate don't line up with the extra
mounting holes on a Mamiya.
On 7/21/05, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2005, at 3:33 PM, William Robb wrote:
The head looks like the one I
Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 4:29 PM, William Robb wrote:
As often as possible, I will go out with one camera and one lens.
Sometimes it'a wide angle, sometimes a normal, sometimes a
telephoto, but always just one lens.
I find it to be a good exercise in seeing.
On 7/21/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful with that little clip-on thing on the legs. It pops off a lot
and you'll need that little wrench to tighten the leg clamps.
Tom Reese
Thanks, Tom. A rubber band takes care of that little problem.
--
Scott Loveless
for those who want to dump their stuff before the company goes up in smoke:
http://quote.tse.or.jp/tse/quote.cgi?F=listing/EDetail1MKTN=TQCODE=7750
Tom Reese
From what I understand there MUST be some difference.
maybe the crop is just the same, it is the point of view that changes...
(look at the faraway stand)
if you use a 18mm , the point of view will be the one of an 18mm,
wheater or not you crop the final image.
Can't understand all this talking
Mine got moved to the camera bag, after the first time it popped off.
dk
On 7/21/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful with that little clip-on thing on the legs. It pops off a lot
and you'll need that little wrench to tighten the leg clamps.
Tom Reese
Tom Reese wrote:
for those who want to dump their stuff before the company goes up in smoke:
http://quote.tse.or.jp/tse/quote.cgi?F=listing/EDetail1MKTN=TQCODE=7750
for some reason that doesn't seem to work consistently but if you go here:
http://www.tse.or.jp/english/index.shtml
then enter
Thursday, July 21, 2005, 2:17:13 PM, Shel wrote:
SB Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax DSLR and
SB a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I tested the
SB concept. Here are the results. You decide how close the two lenses are to
SB being
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO - Rock Pile
Are you telling me to switch to Canon? grin
I used to shoot 67II's. I think Bill Robb is trying to push me toward
4X5.
You see in large format. You may as well be using it.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Theory of Equivalency
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax DSLR and
a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I tested
the
concept. Here are the results. You decide how close the
- Original Message -
From: David Mann
Subject: Re: tripod enablement (plus a bonus)
Do the newer hex-plates actually grip properly? Mine are the old cork
ones and they were hopeless. Any twisting force would cause the camera
or lens to loosen. My 6x7 and my bigger lenses
We're generally the type of traveller to minimize the plans before we
arrive. That way we can spend more time in an interesting place and
less in less interesting area.
That said, in this case we have some family committments (my wife's
extended family is near St John's), so we have some
No tricks Bill - We just snapped the pics and I put 'em up. Decided not to
say which was which, and let the viewer decide for themselves about any
differences.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Theory of Equivalency
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/geek1.html
Just a little snap taken one afternoon in San Francisco.
Details: Leica M3 w 50mm 'cron, Ilford HP5+ (Have since decided I HATE that
film!)
Shel
My apologies if this one has been discussed to any degree before, but
As mentioned before, I'm getting ready for a trip to Newfoundland in
the next couple of weeks. This will be my first trip with the DS, and
it got me thinking.
All my previous trips have had a slide-based photography based.
Thanks for the replies folks;
Cotty: OK, booking online for the London Eye seems to be the way to go, they
even tell you when it will be sundown. August 16 - 18 we're still in Orkney,
We'll be in London from September 10 - 22.
Mike: 13 days in London? Believe it or not this is so that we can
To me, they look equivalent. Yes, different color balance, but this depends
on white balance and film in use. Just either a bit more exposed the 18mm,
or some underexposure for the 28mm, depending on the details you look at.
Small difference in AOV, which could also be visible using two
On 21 Jul 2005 at 5:17, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax DSLR and
a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I tested the
concept. Here are the results. You decide how close the two lenses are to
being equivalent.
fra: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax DSLR and
a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I tested the
concept. Here are the results. You decide how close the two lenses are to
being equivalent.
From: Dave Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/21 Thu PM 01:03:31 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Travelling with Digital.
My apologies if this one has been discussed to any degree before, but
As mentioned before, I'm getting ready for a trip to Newfoundland in
the
I use one of those Portable Hard Discs which are able to download
directly from CF to the HD using their internal battery.
One example is the Xdrive pro (IIRC)...
give it a look, it worth it's money, what's the point of having a
digital camera when you cannot shoot freely because of CF space?
From: Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/21 Thu PM 01:06:18 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT: UK tourist questions
Thanks for the replies folks;
Cotty: OK, booking online for the London Eye seems to be the way to go, they
even tell you when it will be sundown.
AP is reporting a minor incident and evacuated three tube stations and
a bus stop.
I hope everything is OK there. . .
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/21 Thu PM 01:40:00 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Travelling with Digital.
AP is reporting a minor incident and evacuated three tube stations and
a bus stop.
I hope everything is OK there. . .
Detonators (sic)
Apparently yes the *ist-Ds and Pentax put a slimming filter into the
Optio 330/430 RS twins
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0206/02060604pentax330430rsdb100.asp
Major Features
Point 6.
digital filter mode gives you the power to control the tone of your
pictures. Achieving similar effects as
http://www.pmai.org/mktrsrch/mrweb/pi2005.pdf
Herb...
It all depends how much photography you intend to be doing. A 1G card
will hold about 97 PEF files on average, or about 450 JPEG *** files.
If you have two 512M cards and are content with JPEG ***, you'll be
able to store with no other equipment about 450 JPEG *** images.
I went on the
I couldn't tell you which was taken with which lens. Nor could I make a
definitive judgment on which started
life as film. Though I'm guessing the bottom shot was digital, but it's
only a guess.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax DSLR
On Jul 21, 2005, at 6:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax
DSLR and
a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I
tested the
concept. Here are the results. You decide
From DPReview.com:
Pentax SLR Talk
Subject (OT sort of :)) NIKON profit drops 33%.
Posted by jeffkrol [CLICK FOR PROFILE]
Date/Time 1:02:37 AM, Thursday, July 21, 2005 (GMT)
From that International thingy
Operating profit, or sales minus the cost of goods sold and
Yep. That was predictable. Virtually the same perspective. More DOF from the 18
and digital. But also less edge distortion and better edge sharpness. Of course
the lack of white balance control renders the film image a bit murky, so it's a
little tough to compare in some respects. (Not to
Hear, Hear!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not quite. I didn't ~need~ auto bracketing, nor did I need bracketed
shots. I decided to try it because the project at hand was boring and
repetitive and I
fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 21, 2005, at 6:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last week we talked about whether or not an 18mm lens on a Pentax
DSLR and
a 28mm lens on an SLR were equivalent. Saturday my friend and I
Thanks, Boris
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Hi gang,
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=116#comments
Comments here and there welcome...
Good photo. Really bad life :-(...
Boris
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
Yet, Doug, I find exactly the same thing Shel does. The compromises I have to
put up with to have those features is annoying as hell. If their non-use was
transparent it would not be a problem, but it is not transparent, you have to
fight the camera. It is not as simple as just turning off AF,
Fortunately there's no dog catchers here, at least I
never saw them, but a dogpound where stray dogs are
put and then killed sadly exist. But don't ask me how
they get there...
Regards
Albano
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/20/05, Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:14:36 +0200, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0507/05072005benq_e510e520.asp
The SMC system, which was developed in 1971, is suppoed (sic)
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
If they can sell only 20K of DSLR's in the hottest market segment, how
many do you think it can sell of the one above?
I already have
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, mike wilson wrote:
Read further:
The SMC system effectively eliminates surface reflection and flares occurring
snip
Aye, I had. The top of the page reads absurd to me, even more so when
combined with that statement above.
Kostas
On 21/7/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have had the cash under my mattress (I put it there so it doesn't burn
a hole
in my pocket, plus it's winter here) ready to slam down on the virtual
camera
shop counter for a nice high spec Pentax DSLR for quite a while. I don't
know
...manual? who reads the manual...
Graywolf wrote:
Yet, Doug, I find exactly the same thing Shel does. The compromises I
have to put up with to have those features is annoying as hell. If
their non-use was transparent it would not be a problem, but it is not
transparent, you have to fight
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/geek1.html
Just a little snap taken one afternoon in San Francisco.
Details: Leica M3 w 50mm 'cron, Ilford HP5+ (Have since decided I HATE that
film!)
Shel
Huh -- so they actually exist outside the TV ads then? Cool. Thanks
Cristian wrote:
I already have an istD. I don't see a Ds or Dl in my future.
If they want me to buy another DSLR from them, they have to do better than
that.
BINGO!
BINGO indeed. I don't even own a DSLR. They need to do much better than the
*istD's in order to tempt me...
Pål
The *istD is the only autofocus camera I've ever used, but I have to say that
it presents no compromises whatsoever when used with manual focus lenses. With
MF lenses, it's a manual focus camera. Period. I agree wholeheartedly that
every photographer should understand the math and physics of
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both shots would benefit from a red eye removal tool of some sort,
though g
HAR! (took me a minute to figure out where)
Christian
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Graywolf wrote:
fight the camera. It is not as simple as just turning off AF, for instance,
every AF camera I have ever tried to us has had its manual focus use
compromised by the changes made to the design for the AF to work at all.
What cameras would these be (are we
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/21 Thu PM 02:28:39 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Pentax sells lenses on OEM basis
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, mike wilson wrote:
Read further:
The SMC system effectively eliminates surface reflection and flares
Hello Shel,
Almost could have been an ad for the company. Nice shot!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, July 21, 2005, 5:59:37 AM, you wrote:
SB http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/geek1.html
SB Just a little snap taken one afternoon in San Francisco.
SB Details: Leica M3 w 50mm 'cron,
For the price of a card or three, I bought a 60gb CompactDrive to dump
my cards to. Never really have to think or worry about card space
anymore. Even shooting Raw, have plenty of room. Something to
consider...
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, July 21, 2005, 6:03:31 AM, you wrote:
DK My
I never made that assumption, nor did I say or imply it, Doug.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Doug Brewer
Why do you and Shel assume I don't know camera basics just because I
choose to use a modern camera?
WHAT??!??
Pal, the optimist (which is a good thing, BTW), who predicts that Pentax
will deliver the products we all desire, hasn't purchased one of Pentax's
current best offerings?
Who are you speaking for then?
Tom C.
BINGO indeed. I don't even own a DSLR. They need to do much better
Badly written, Shel. I meant to use myself as an example of a new camera
user.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I never made that assumption, nor did I say or imply it, Doug.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Doug Brewer
Why do you and Shel assume I don't know camera basics just because I
choose
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
WHAT??!??
Pal, the optimist (which is a good thing, BTW), who predicts that Pentax
will deliver the products we all desire,
Oh, the irony of it all.. Pal, the champion for all things Pentax,
never has anything good to say about the actual products.
That's just not true. Pal is responsible for some of my enablements. His
glowing lens comments have influenced some of my purchasing decisions.
Tom Reese
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Christian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
WHAT??!??
Pal, the optimist (which is a good thing, BTW), who predicts that Pentax
will
There's one constant truth in photography: Knowledge is power.
Knowledge about exposure, lighting, focusing, manual, automatic and all
variations thereof.
There is a natural human tendency to consider knowledge that one already
has to be more important than knowledge yet to be obtained and the
I'm starting to think I missed the
memo that
said All Stage Photography
Must Be Done With Grainy B/W Film.
Doug see below.:
I saved this for a reason.vbg
MEMO..
June 10 1975
To all Stage shooters:
Until further notice,please use hispeed BW
Well said Sir.
Dave
There's one constant truth in photography:
Knowledge is power.
Knowledge about exposure, lighting, focusing, manual, automatic and all
variations thereof.
There is a natural human tendency to consider knowledge that one already
has
You guys haven't been around quite as long probably. The use of the word
never is of course an exaggeration.
The point is this... How can Pal argue and assure us that Pentax is capable
of/will produce the high end DSLR products we want, when they haven't
produced one that he's willing to
On 21/7/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's like a car, for example. How often do I use *all* the features of
my car? One of the reasons I bought the car I have is because of the
large storage volume it has for a vehicle of its size. But I only take
advantage of it a few times a
Any one who knows me well, knows i hate changes in my life.
I liked the good old days so to speak.
Last one on the block to get a car with Auto Transmission.
Last one at work to ask for a computer.
Last Party Chief at work to retire the old manual transit for the new
electronic gizmo.
Still
Hummm, this enplanes much, and is more than a little disturbing.
Cotty wrote:
On 21/7/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's like a car, for example. How often do I use *all* the features of
my car? One of the reasons I bought the car I have is because of the
large storage
that should be ...explains..., damned spell checker...
P. J. Alling wrote:
Hummm, this enplanes much, and is more than a little disturbing.
Cotty wrote:
On 21/7/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's like a car, for example. How often do I use *all* the features of
my car?
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/7/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's like a car, for example. How often do I use *all* the features of
my car? One of the reasons I bought the car I have is because of the
large storage volume it has for a vehicle of its size. But I only take
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
