That's a great story, Paul.
In case it wasn't a story, tho', and speaking purely from logic (not
experience) get a roll of paper towels, a set of gloves and a bottle
of Windex. While the cab is still in the garage, wipe down all
possible places you might have touched the car.
Put on the gloves
What's a Spart (Sparc?) Select?
keith == also wears shorts year 'round...
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Bruce!
Dennis wears shorts all year 'round. Even when jt gets down below -20C if you
can imagine that. He'll wear
Totally depends on the end use. How is the structure loaded? Would you
put the fastener in shear or tension? Makes all the difference in the
world, mechanically.
In any case, a screw hammered in with a hammer is stupid. Works less
efficiently then a nail would, and is pitiful in tension (pulling
Bill Owens wrote:
My linguist peeve is preventative instead of preventive
*
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)
1 definition(s) found
Preventative \Pre*venta*tive\, n.
That which prevents; -- incorrectly used instead of
preventive.
* :-D ***
keith whaley
Bruce Walker wrote:
Nick David Wright wrote:
I am definitely looking at the lower end cameras (I'm assuming
that's what you mean by bridge). The upper end cameras are nice but
really don't do anything for me that the less expensive models don't
do too.
The definition I'm used-to is that
Thibouille wrote:
Mmm Nikon is rumoured to introduce a medium format lineup (MX format)
based on a sensor of 54x54 mm.
If this is true, Pentax MF'd better be cheap enough, and Leica is screwed ;)
Anyway, rumours ... :p
A tiny bit smaller than the old time 2 1/4 square format. What would the
JC OConnell wrote:
Rectangle Definition :
From Latin: rectus right + angle,
A 4-sided polygon where all interior angles are 90°
=
JC O'Connell
As far as you go, your statement is totally correct.
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
Oh, c'mon now. Next thing you'll be telling us that a square is a
rhombus, or a trapezoid.
While all 4 corners of both a square and a rectangle must be
90 degrees, the
commonly accepted (preferred) definition states that a
rectangle has adjacent
sides of UNequal length.
I
JC OConnell wrote:
A square is a special rectangle, but it IS a rectangle.
I just googled it last night, nowhere in any of the
definitions does it say that a rectangle has to have
any requirements on side lengths. Its just has to
have all 4 corners at 90 degreees. There is differentiation,
the
Larry Colen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:50:16PM -0500, JC OConnell wrote:
# Whiz? In what class?, remedial school?
#
# a square IS a rectangle. a square photo format is still a rectangular
# format.
# its just a rectangle with all four sides equal length.
Oh, c'mon now. Next thing
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi Everyone:
1) The point of this exercise was to shoot closer engage with people
more, which really doesn't come naturally to me. For the bit of street
stuff I've done, I have used the
Bob W wrote:
I've been there several times, and have never run across a GESO Steet!
keith
Very well done, Keith. You're a good boy for always stopping on the kerb,
looking left, right and left again (or perhaps the other way where you live)
and only when the street is clear walking
AlunFoto wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea0CDieb4yMhl=no
Cheers,
Jostein
Outstanding!
That led me to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d9P26fvVpwfeature=related
Fine guitar work!
Ooops! I hope it's a Pentax Acoustic! :-D
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Pedro Oliveira wrote:
Hi.
My first post was in November, 1997.
My second post is this one... ;-)
Pedro Oliveira
Hah!
I don't believe that!
The earliest post I can find for myself is 2006, which I know is wrong! I was on
much earlier than that, but...in the meanwhile I had changed my
Cotty wrote:
And on-topic.
My son Stefan has been accepted for some work experience in the
photography dept. at our local paper, The Oxford Mail (and sister paper
The Oxford Times) for a week in July :-) Not without a little brow-
beating from yours truly of course, but nonetheless, here's the
Cotty wrote:
On 16/2/09, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Oh! Is that Stephan in the co-pilot seat? Great!
Stefan. Yah.
Ooops! Most humble apologies! Your Stefan is the only one I've ever known!
I won't do that again!
* * * *
I damn near solo'd in '45 in a light plane (Piper Cub
Cotty wrote:
On 16/2/09, keith_w, undiscombobulated, lashed out:
I damn near solo'd in '45 in a light plane (Piper Cub). Had a LOT of
hours dual, and was close, but...just the way it went.
I thought you flew with the USAF?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
I flew when I was very young, out of a CAA
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/16/09, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 16/2/09, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
Out on a limb here, but you didn't let him pick the music, did you?
Har.
Royalty free music - choice is not magnificent.
Scott Loveless wrote:
I was sitting here drinking, wondering if I spouted off too much on
the list tonight and reading through the quotes lists, when I realized
I've been subscribed to the list for 4 years this month. Please
accept my apologies.
Uhhh, for stopping smoking, or for belonging
Rick Womer wrote:
Acetone dissolves polycarbonate very nicely. One of =my= friends discovered
this many years ago.
Try this: Get some DEET-containing insect repellent. Immerse the camera in
it. The DEET will dissolve the camera, and leave the superglue pellet
behind. Remove the pellet.
Cotty wrote:
On 15/2/09, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Obviously nobody would be so stupid as to do a thing like this, but let's
just suppose that you had a friend - yea, let's say a friend, that's good -
who was a complete dork and accidentally dripped cyanoacrylate superglue
onto the OK
Cotty wrote:
Actually I decided I don't like it but wtf...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/index.html
R-D1 + 15/4.5
--
Cheers,
Cotty
I still like your Squall At Sunset!
Lovely catch, well done.
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Derby Chang wrote:
Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/HG1.jpg
http://www.web-options.com/HG2.jpg
Bob
Very tasty, especially the 2nd. Her shoes don't look like much in the
1st, but really catch my eye in the 2nd. Minor thing, if only we could
see all of the shoes.
I like gamine.
D
Cotty wrote:
On 12/2/09, Monica, discombobulated, unleashed:
...hat I'd given up several times, included 2 separate periods of
a year each. Each time I went back to it was because I thought I could enjoy
the pleasure of a cigar in a park on a beautiful spring day, and not get
instantly
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/12/09, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest part of when i quit, was to keep my mind busy, But instead
i just made toasted BTL sandwiches.:-)
Yeah, I've put on a little weight.
Don't let 'em tell you it's all psychological...
Oh, it IS,
JC OConnell wrote:
the K85/1.8, K105/2.8 and K120/2.8 are better lenses...
JC O'Connell
True!
I have an SMC Pentax 85/1.8 I'd part with, but it will cost you.
I bought it for $450 US, 6 years ago and will part with it for the same.
Beautiful lens!
Body 99% perfect, glass 100%.
keith
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Peter Alling webste...@mindspring.com wrote:
At the resolution presented I can't tell it's a ring or some other artifact.
Severely cropped, full resolution, oversharpened, it looks like it
might be a ring but not a wedding band or
John Celio wrote:
I can host it on my site. Is graywolf not able to host it anymore?
John
Did you get an answer to that, John?
Haven't heard from him in a long time.
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Cotty wrote:
Hi gang,
I'm testing some video on my website - if you'd like to try it on your
computer and connection, please feel free.
it's a 3 minute test and is currently too small, and judders a bit (have
to republish with de-interlaced video and a bit bigger but it's getting
there) - I
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
FF means for free.
I just got an Optio A40 (so maybe I can take a pic for the PUG now and
then). Haven't used it yet, but it seems heavy enough that it won't be too hard to
use (light PS's are a problem, move too much).
That leaves me with the Optio S4i. It's too
Cotty wrote:
On 23/1/09, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you come to DC, a pdml group outing could be organized.
Airfares are not bad from Chicago to DC right now...
But the pound is.
This time last year I would get 2 bucks for a pound. Now - $1.36 !!!
Add to that I have
John Graves wrote:
Since it seems rant time...My phone just rang again with an
unknown caller! I am being killed by robo-calls. They don't seem to
have to pay attention to anything. One call, for the tenth, (at least)
time says this is the last time they will call me to reduce my
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Bruce, Marnie, Ken, Dave and all who had a look.
Yes, I think I'm going to re-title it body language. The woman seems
to be defensive and the man anxious to speak. They probably aren't good
listeners.
Paul
I think it's a great catch! A few seconds either way
Cotty wrote:
On 16/1/09, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gee, Toto... I don't think we're in Philly anymore...
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8507667size=lg
Rick
It looks like it, doesn't it!
Look at all the chimley pots!
Lovely!
keith whaley
That wouldn't be
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Rejoyce!
Ralf
An exclamation under the photo's title says Frohlocket'. My translator says
that is Glad-Lured! What?!
Can you do
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
keith_w keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:
An exclamation under the photo's title says Frohlocket'. My translator says
that is Glad-Lured! What?!
Can you do better, please?
Rejoyce!
Ralf
As you already posted in one message! :-D Thanks!
keith
--
PDML Pentax
John Francis wrote:
Here's a picture of my back deck around lunchtime today:
http://www.jfwaf.com/temp/Jan2009.jpg
The temperatures are in the 70s for the fourth day running
Maybe all that power running thru those overhead lines melted the snow?
...or maybe not...
keith
--
PDML
Joseph McAllister wrote:
Jeeez Keith, that makes you older than me, by a bunch...
Hell, I'm rapidly getting older than ANYone else, so...not much surprises me
anymore! :-D
keith
On Jan 13, 2009, at 16:03 , keith_w wrote:
Bill Owens wrote:
Out local media is reminding me of Dave's
Scott Loveless wrote:
It's Cotty's birthday where Cotty is. Somebody call him, please, and
pass on the birthday wishes.
Where IS Cotty these days?
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Cotty wrote:
On 14/1/09, m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com, discombobulated, unleashed:
Happy Birthday, Cot.
New translation, sadly truncated. Enjoy.
http://www.elwp.com/Joe%20Cocker.html
Har!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Happy birthday, Cotty!
Seriously I gotta say, Cocker is certifiably NUTS!
I
Bill Owens wrote:
Out local media is reminding me of Dave's recent post about the
Toronto blizzard. We're expecting lows in the upper teens and highs
in the mid to upper 30's and they call this an Arctic invasion. I
remember living in the Chicago and Indiana area when this would be
considered
Cotty wrote:
Hi gang,
Posting this pic again because today William Stone passed away, aged
108. I have filmed him for the news many times over the years, and
photographed him once:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/portraits/images/pic19.html
Canon 1D mark II + Pentax A*85mm 1.4 wide open.
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/2009 1:30:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bkday...@daytonphoto.com writes:
I thought you all might enjoy seeing what my little girl created for
Christmas. On Christmas Eve she worked really hard all on her own to
write a letter to Santa to
Derby Chang wrote:
I know I have had some copious amounts of wine tonight, but I may have
inadvertently hit my peak I am ever likely to attain. Darnit
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/09/09_01/09_01_belly/01.htm
Hah! I love it!
However, just wait 'til he finds out he kissed a sister!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
[...]
I had my modest shoulder bag, the G1 fitted with Olympus 25mm lens...
The G1 being a micro 4/3 format, which Oly 25mm, please?
Thanks,
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
David J Brooks wrote:
Considering when the original elevation was run, 20' is not to bad.
Then again another nail in the surveyor f***ked up, coffin
If this was triangulated as apposed to hand run, that is.
I have worked on level projects were the grade was extremely steep,
and good closures
ann sanfedele wrote:
You have to remember, PS cameras are not made to appeal to advanced
photographers like us. They're made for lowest-common-denominator
users, and as such have to be as simple and user friendly as possible.
Alas, they are not in any way simple and user friendly
Hear,
Christine Aguila wrote:
Hey, that's a cool recipe--a bit like my beef stew but with out the wine
mushrooms--I'll have to try that. Happy New Year, Ann. Cheers,
Christine
Christine,
That 1/4 cup (2 oz.) of white wine will lose all its alcohol by heating, leaving
only the subtle taste it
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Celio
Subject: Re: sic transit optio w60
Quoting Ann S.
Whoever said I wouldn't be happy with a bitsy camera , you were right...
I can't stand not having a viewfinder, and can't hold the damn thing
steady.
The lack of viewfinder
John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 07:11:55PM -0800, keith_w wrote:
Oh, and since the image numbers start with IMGP0001.JPG, I know they were
the first images ever recorded with that camera.
Not necessarily - the camera owner may well have had the camera set
to restart numbering
ann sanfedele wrote:
[...]
guess ya didn't like the cat :-)
best,
ann
Hah! LOVED that independent ol' Cat!
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Bob Blakely wrote:
1.I don't give a flying f about discussing who you, I, or anyone
else will or will not do business with unless they are cheating
customers regarding photography related items. This is because:
2.This forum is no place for this post. You should find or start
another
ann sanfedele wrote:
Keith - Joe McAllister has recommended the z10... it sounds spectacular
and within my budget...
7x optical zoom and up to 3200 ISO... The Pentax Optio Z10 is a
small, compact digital camera
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_pentax_optio_z10.php# with a
twist -
ann sanfedele wrote:
not sure I can afford it but it would certainly be good for me , since I
drowned one of my cameras by accident.
ann
Must be a hair after 5 PM in your neck o' the woods, so...what'd you get?
Share, please!
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You won't believe this, but...I have a 512MB SD memory card, and it has 6 photos
on it. The EXIF data says they were recorded on a *istDS, back on June 29th of
2006.
I must have bought this card from eBay for my Optio S4, 'cause I don't own a DS,
and none of the images mean anything to me.
ann sanfedele wrote:
I got a little bit of money for my birthday I very much liked the
Optio Bill Robb had at GFM - I want a used one cheap...
Beyond one of you selling it to me...
Do any of these point and shoots shoot raw?
The Optios won't. They record at 2304 X 1728 pixels at
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Some stuff I've been working on ...
http://www.gdgphoto.com/emergence/
All at ISO 800-1600 using the Pentax M50/1.4 near wide open, fitted to
the Olympus EC14.
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
Since I didn't recognize that
Dario Bonazza wrote:
The Panasonic LX3/Leica Dlux4 approaches the quality of a SRL in most
respects.
Noise is better than that of Pentax PS, but cannot match that of a DLSR.
Pros:
Fast, excellent lens,
Excellent dynamic range,
24mm shorter focal length,
A meter hard to fool,
RAW capture.
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo07/peso9.html
Comments, as always, welcomed.
-Marco
Heh...got hooked and watched 'em all, Marco!
You have a good eye.
In most cases, you seem invisible to your 'audience'! With rare exception,
nobody pays attention to the photographer.
Sandy Harris wrote:
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heineken, *probably* the best beer in the world...
At one point, I hung around with some Belgian and Dutch
people who kidded each other a lot, mostly in English so
te rest of us could understand.
One of the Beligians' better
ann sanfedele wrote:
I have a book called BIS: Jonvelle - I think it is fairly well known
(snicker snicker)
[...]
here's the link:
http://tinyurl.com/557kwm
not a big issue -- but I'm curious
ann
Hi Anne,
In your URL, it was stated, Alas, on ebay we can no longer accept money
JC OConnell wrote:
Huh? The whole point of a M42 DSLR is to get the convenience
of the M42 automatic aperture function which WAS invented over
50 years ago. There is no M42 DSLR or DSLR adapter on the market
that enables the M42 lenses to operate fully (yet). That's my point.
This M42 DSLR would
Joseph McAllister wrote:
John, I was in the Navy back in the 60s. When a new version of a lens or
camera came out and was listed in the catalog of new gear, we bought it.
It was my job, when the new stuff arrived, to sit on the loading dock at
the rear of the photolab and use a hammer and a
Bob W wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
I've an opinion on this too. (Full of 'em tonight! :-D
Does anyone believe Leica's bodies and lenses justify their
obscene prices, from
a manufacturing and assembly cost standpoint? Is there THAT
much labor in either
one?
You're paying 80% of the money
PN Stenquist wrote:
Well done. Nice model, nice photo.
Paul
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 19/11/08, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://walthamler.smugmug.com/gallery/4592986_mrB5J#420702323_i4KP4-XL-LB
Maybe a little OT but a fun story.
A gent in our church
Cotty wrote:
On 17/11/08, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I believe Cotty's net worth is about £17-, and he still has more money than
brains.
You bastard! £18 I'll have you know.
\
Hell, I'll gladly give him the extra two £ so he can be a £20-innaire!
Good onya, lad!
keith
--
PDML
Bob W wrote:
Some good photos of the fires in CA here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7731706.stm
I particularly like #5, which confirms all our prejudices about Californians
:o)
Bob
What's our?
Use of a Segway confirms someone's prejudices? What might those be?
keith whaley
--
Bob W wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Some good photos of the fires in CA here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7731706.stm
I particularly like #5, which confirms all our prejudices about
Californians
:o)
Bob
What's our?
Use of a Segway confirms someone's prejudices?
Everyone in Europe,
Derby Chang wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/11/05 Wed PM
Cotty wrote:
On 4/11/08, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ya know, I need a set of magnifying lenses that fit on my regular
glasses. I think jewelers have them...
I have
Cotty wrote:
On 6/11/08, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
The requested URL /fishingkitsclothingandaccessories.php?id=1487 was
not found
on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an
ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Hi Keith,
Just tried
DagT wrote:
I´ve noticed that. Almost every US citicen I´ve met the past years has
started by appologizing for George W. Bush :-)
Anyway, one thing we Scandinavians though were funny was that the
Republicans warned that the US would end up like Sweden if Obama won.
Sweden is pretty much
ann sanfedele wrote:
Well said, both Frank and Derby.
It was amazing here (on my street) last night - or rather , this
morning...
I needed Ralf's skills in night photography to capture it - :-)
Regardless of what you think of the outcome, and I'm unabashedly delighted,
Why is that not a
mike wilson wrote:
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/11/04 Tue PM 07:25:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax MX questions - follow up
Cotty wrote:
On 4/11/08, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ya know, I need a set of magnifying lenses that fit
keith_w wrote:
I took the back off my lovely MX, to find out when it was assembled
(Oct. 1980) and noticed a lot of black deposits on the light-seal ridges
of the back, top and bottom.
Thinking that was deteriorated foam seal stuff, I got out the denatured
(isopropyl) alcohol and a bunch
Derby Chang wrote:
I've never replaced mirror box seals, but seals on the back are pretty
easy to do.
I got some foam from this fellow on eekbay
http://myworld.ebay.com.au/interslice/
The little bamboo tool is good for cleaning out the old gunk, with a
little alcohol help (naturally). The
Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Nov 4, 2008, at 00:16 , keith_w wrote:
Ya know, I need a set of magnifying lenses that fit on my regular
glasses. I think jewelers have them...
Your optometrist should have or be able to get you clip-on magnifiers
like I use. They flip up, and clip to the frame
Cotty wrote:
On 4/11/08, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ya know, I need a set of magnifying lenses that fit on my regular glasses. I
think jewelers have them...
I have one of these:
http://www.anglersrendezvous.co.uk/f
ishingkitsclothingandaccessories.php?id=1487
not cheap but mine
Bob W wrote:
One of my friends became a British citizen today:
http://www.web-options.com/Citizenship/
Bob
Some really outstanding shots there, Bob!
Fifth from last, lower right, is filled with raw emotion! You can really feel
it. Everybody is going thru their own strong feelings. Love the
I took the back off my lovely MX, to find out when it was assembled (Oct. 80)
and noticed a lot of black deposits on the light-seal ridges of the back, top
and bottom.
Tbinking that was deteriorated foam seal stuff, I got out the denatured
(isopropyl) alcohol and a bunch of swabs.
Well, it
Bob Sullivan wrote:
It's the old light seals. Clean them off, clean out the groves,
install new ones.
Regards, Bob S.
It was/is. Under magnification, they DO look pretty clean now! Wonder why!?
I'll deliver it to my local repair guy, about a mile away. if he's still in
business, that is!
Doug Franklin wrote:
Howdy, folks,
If you have the urge to buy a Garmin product, STOP, DON'T DO IT. They're
a worthless bunch of sackless wankers who are more than willing to steal
your money and then try to silence you if you complain. Don't even try
to post a negative review of their
Brian Walters wrote:
Very nice, Jack.
The covered bridge is an interesting design. I suppose they must have
been constructed in other places but they seem (to me, anyway) to be a
real American icon. I often wonder why they were covered. Was it just
for shelter or was there some other reason?
John Celio wrote:
It's just a stamp. I'd much rather have the government not portray
smoking as cool than accurately reproduce a tiny version of an old photo.
John
Sorry, John. No, it's NOT just a stamp.
Even a stamp should portray visual fact. Visual reality.
Correcting history should be
Norm Baugher wrote:
Bullshitt. If he was shooting digital and he had the exposures on his
computer no one would say a thing
Norm
Oh, I think some would, as it's not a matter of what media was used, at all...
Seems to me, the entire object of recording an image is so you or others can
John Sessoms wrote:
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the _act_ of taking a photograph is all there is, why bother with
film or a memory card? Keep your battery charged and go thru the
motions, because capturing the image is not the end product ~ being in
a place of your choosing
Norm Baugher wrote:
Bittte me Mark.
You forgot to say bitte.
keith
Mark Roberts wrote:
Norm Baugher wrote:
Bullshitt. If he was shooting digital and he had the exposures on his
computer no one would say a thing
You misspelled Bullshit Norm. Try to get these things right in the
Norm Baugher wrote:
Winogrand.
ann sanfedele wrote:
One quite prominent BW film shooter with the first name of Gary last
name starts with W
And two R's in Garry.
keith whaley (no R's)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Rick Womer wrote:
From the New York Times Magazine, March 13 1988:
Stashed away in bureau drawers and plastic garbage bags in his Los Angeles
home were more than 2,400 rolls of exposed but undeveloped film, as well as
6,500 rolls of developed film that had not been proofed. Contact sheets of
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: Philosophy
Of course old is a relative term, isn't it? ;-)
Well, the more I shoot (or older I become, or whatever else) the more
reluctant I feel to sit down and process the photos right away. Though
some
Cotty wrote:
On 7/10/08, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Last Friday in Dunkirk:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/14514788
Shot taken from under the tailgate. No way of doing anything without the
shelter provided by the car, not even with the heavy 300
Cotty wrote:
On 7/10/08, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Whichever guitar you end up with, this instructional video is sure to help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1ThSi1wbqU
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
That was a wonderful find, Mark! And thanks for passing it along, Cotty! g
AlunFoto wrote:
Here's more meat to the bone:
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/408/story/219105.html
Jostein
That sounds pretty clear to me!
The historic owners are joining the buyers in making sure the land stays clean
and clear of destructive practices.
If it all happens as intended,
Bob Blakely wrote:
Geez Paul, I didn't know I was flaming. I certainly didn't intend to.
I'm all alone here, and I just wanted to be conversational.
Nevertheless, I'm sorry. It won't happen again.
Regards
Bob...
Don't worry about it, Bob.
You've been around long enough so folks don't have
Rick Womer wrote:
This list is, and should remain, a politics-free zone.
Rick
Not all subjects are so black and white.
I'd think an exception could be made for notifying photographers about important
laws being proposed that would affect copyright law!
Those who publish their photographs
Cotty wrote:
On 21/9/08, Joseph McAllister, discombobulated, unleashed:
What Cotty wants is more like this...
http://www.416-1100.com/gallery/4751616_7oJ2S#281667185_7JDgD-A-LB
But that link was atrocious!
This is much better:
http://www.macvideo.tv/reviews/index.cfm?reviewid=102409
Bob W wrote:
Things are starting to get really bad. Even in the darkest days of the
Irish Potato Famine, even in the worst of 14th-century plague years,
even in the depths of the Great Depression I don't think ordinary
people had to make sacrifices like this unfortunate woman:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Not entirely true, I have a friend who's the legal mind behind a local
studio. His opinion is that releases are necessary. You never know
when someone is going to be a b*d.
If it's outside, in the open, I.E. exposed to the public, it's your legal
friend
who's
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Blakely wrote:
I usually buy my gear from Samy's as they have a local store just down the
road in Santa Ana. I stopped in to pick up another walking around bag and
found that all the Pentax gear is now gone from their shelves. The have only
left over stock. It's not
Cotty wrote:
Last call for
Pentax A20mm 2.8 really nice condition. Genuine front and rear caps,
pouch, box. All mint minus. Before it goes on eekbay, make me an offer.
Also exc + K 50mm 1.4 with trick LENS HOOD suitable for 1.5 crop sensor
DSLR: 85 1.8 / 100 4 / 105 2.8 hood
Going
frank theriault wrote:
Yet another hommage to Elliot Erwitt:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-about-me.html
Comments always welcome.
thanks,
frank
Absolutely *love* these, Frank, but the display app will not let me pause and
spend some time looking at individual
1 - 100 of 1161 matches
Mail list logo
