From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:28:41 -0400
So the hypothetical question is - can enough no votes keep an image from
being seen by the judges
/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Something that surprises me a bit is my dismay at many
of the
titles.
I don't find myself reviewing the equipment as much
Kenneth Waller
KW http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
KW - Original Message -
KW From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KW Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
sounds logical to me, thanks :o)
rg2
On 8/31/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the judges decide things with respect
.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery rules
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:05:37 -0400
This seems bizarre since I would think that Pentax would want to
highlight it's
What, Moi?
Cotty wrote:
On 31/8/07, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
It will be interesting to see if Bruce's non-Pentax lens images are
accepted. I've got a few in that category I'd like to submit.
Okay, while we're at this, I wonder what reaction *I* would get.
Well, if I were judging I'd have accepted them.
However, who am I to judge what's good and what's not. Of the last six I
submitted, 5 were declined and the one that was accepted was a re-submit of one
previously rejected (with only a bit of slight 'tweaking').
Still, I like the challenge so
I'm surprised these were rejected. Good work.
Paul
On Aug 29, 2007, at 2:19 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Well, if I were judging I'd have accepted them.
However, who am I to judge what's good and what's not. Of the last
six I submitted, 5 were declined and the one that was accepted was
a
Me too. :-)
Thanks Paul.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/29/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised these were rejected. Good work.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/29/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if I were judging I'd have accepted them.
Thanks Brian :-)
However, who am I to judge what's good and what's not. Of the last six I
submitted, 5 were declined and the one that was accepted was a re-submit of
one previously rejected
I was feeling a bit pi55sy when I wrote that.
It's their (Pentax's) gallery and they're free to select what they
want. But as you say I'd prefer it if they were doing the judging
not the participents.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/29/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My complaint has nothing to
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/08/28 Tue PM 08:26:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
I only say
that because I see so many travel photos put up with those two lenses,
and I am wondering just what those people
Quite frankly, I think the entire process of peer judging is fatally
flawed.
If Pentax wants to have a judged gallery, then they should be judging the
thing themselves, with qualified judges, not passing on the responsibility
to people of questionable or no qualification regarding judging of
List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:39:16 +
It's obvious you're being discriminated against. You have a mere 50 pics on
the site:-)) !!!
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
I only say
that because I see so many travel photos put up with those two lenses,
and I am wondering just what those people are thinking.
mw I don't understand what you are trying to say. Can you elucidate?
mw -
mw
PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/08/28 Tue PM 08:26:32 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
I only say
that because I see so many travel photos put up with those two
lenses,
and I am wondering just what those people are thinking.
mw I don't
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, obviously I am part of the problem - I'm one of those voting on
the images.
When voting, the images are presented somewhat as they
are submitted. Quite a few times now, I have seen maybe 10-30 images
all of a trip with some commentary much like you'd
David J Brooks wrote:
On 8/28/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm discriminating against Pentax by not sending them any more
photos. I'm posting them on Canon's gallery. :-
Nikon's for me.:-)
I'm defecting to the Holga gallery. Anyone got the URL?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mark Roberts wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 8/28/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm discriminating against Pentax by not sending them any more
photos. I'm posting them on Canon's gallery. :-
Nikon's for me.:-)
I'm defecting to the Holga gallery. Anyone
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Well, obviously I am part of the problem - I'm one of those voting on
the images.
When voting, the images are presented somewhat as they
are submitted. Quite a few times now, I have seen maybe 10-30 images
all of a trip with some commentary much like you'd show travel
And I don't pay much attention to the titles.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Something that surprises me a bit is my dismay at many of the titles.
I don't find myself reviewing
Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Something that surprises me a bit is my dismay at many of the
titles.
I don't find myself reviewing the equipment as much as I would have
expected.
It seems the oblique nature of many titles
Probably just my own complaining, but I do continue to see a large
slant towards outdoor (scenic) and street photography. One real downside to
'artists' voting before the judges even get a crack at it, is those
biases can come out. For example, after seeing about 400 dragonflies
and butterflies
I quit submitting quite a while ago. I think I only put up one shot since the
peer judging was introduced. It was one that had previously been accepted but
that I had felt a need to edit. It was promptly rejected. I'm okay with what I
have now ( even the dragonfly:-), so I doubt that I'll try
It's obvious you're being discriminated against. You have a mere 50 pics on the
site:-)) !!!
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably just my own complaining, but I do continue to see a large
slant towards outdoor (scenic) and street
I'm discriminating against Pentax by not sending them any more photos. I'm
posting them on Canon's gallery. :-
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug
I've decided to cast my vote based on lens grin - if it is the kit
lens or the 50-200, automatic reject. Just kidding... I only say
that because I see so many travel photos put up with those two lenses,
and I am wondering just what those people are thinking.
Honestly, It would be nice if you
@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:39:16 +
It's obvious you're being discriminated against. You have a mere 50 pics on
the site:-)) !!!
-- Original message --
From: Bruce
any more
photos. I'm
posting them on Canon's gallery. :-
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:39:16 +
It's obvious you're being
Yes and about 48 of them were before the new voting system. I used to
have a hit percent of near 50% - now it is about 5%
--
Bruce
Tuesday, August 28, 2007, 12:39:16 PM, you wrote:
pcn It's obvious you're being discriminated against. You have a
pcn mere 50 pics on the site:-)) !!!
pcn
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I've decided to cast my vote based on lens grin - if it is the kit
lens or the 50-200, automatic reject. Just kidding... I only say
that because I see so many travel photos put up with those two lenses,
and I am wondering just what those people are thinking.
Honestly,
/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Gallery voting
Probably just my own complaining, but I do continue to see a large
slant towards outdoor (scenic) and street photography. One real downside
to
'artists' voting before the judges even get
If they've raised the bar, they should go back and review all images in the
gallery with the new standard then... IMHO.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
C'on now, Tom. Keep shooting and don't get discouraged. (don't
statements like that make you just gag)?
Maybe your earlier accepted images simply raised the bar too high. (no
smiley..notice0.(?)
Mr Sprat
Generally, it's a sort of putting on the brakes feeling to me. I have
like concerns about style/subject tendencies influencing we judges,
but it may be that Pentax is wanting to stem the tide by accepting
fewer and fewer images. In the beginning there was probably an effort
to quickly build a
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
LOL. Jack.
I think I'm tending towards not participating because... darn it, I'm 47
years old and I just can't take it anymore... the rejection, it's a heavy
burden...
Just remember, your dogs love you.
William
LOL. Jack.
I think I'm tending towards not participating because... darn it, I'm 47
years old and I just can't take it anymore... the rejection, it's a
heavy
burden...
Just remember, your dogs love you.
William Robb
I know, and every time I kick one of them I get in trouble with
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:09:23 -0400
As near as I can tell from timing of acceptance/rejection, it
appears
that
there is a tally of votes on a photo - when it reaches a
threshold of
either accept or reject, the photo
Tom likes anything that humps his leg and licks his face. 8(
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL. Jack.
I think I'm tending towards not participating because... darn it,
I'm 47
years old and I just can't take it anymore... the rejection, it's
a
heavy
burden...
Bruce -
It also involves, I would thing - model's releases and the fear of the
bride not wanting her photo
out there on line.
I would never enter a portrait of anyone in a photo contest, myself,
unless I had a full release from
the subject and it wasn't a posed for shot someone asked me to
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:25:33 -0400
Bruce -
It also involves, I would thing - model's releases and the fear of the
bride not wanting her photo
out there on line.
I would never enter
Don't think it is getting that far. I have photos with people in them
already in the gallery. I believe the model release angle has to do
with commercial gain. My issue is that the images are not even being
seen by Pentax Judges because of the pre-screening by all of us
'artists' - I gave my
Good point Ann, but if that's the case they should state it.
I've had a portrait accepted there was no issue with a release.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Bruce -
It also
require that
TC for every single people shot in glamour/fashion and portraiture, in that
TC case.
TC Tom C.
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
If they've raised the bar, they should go back and review all images in
the
gallery with the new standard then... IMHO.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Well it's their backyard, but it's really OUR football(s) on the playing
field. :-)
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:51:11
Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they've raised the bar, they should go back and review all
images in the gallery with the new standard then... IMHO.
If people are complaining about images being rejected now just imagine
the reaction if previously accepted images got dumped!
(If Pentax's
with a release.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Bruce -
It also involves, I would thing - model's releases and the fear of
the
bride not wanting her photo
out there on line.
I
Certainly it's free and we probably have little right to complain. But our
egos must be considered.
:-)
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Date: Tue, 28
At 03:14 AM 29/08/2007, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Probably just my own complaining, but I do continue to see a large
slant towards outdoor (scenic) and street photography.
snip
I've just now decided to give up on the gallery.
2 of my better efforts were recently rejected:
My complaint has nothing to do with the gallery judges - it is with us
artists. Each of us has biases and things that interest us. So our
voting can be very lopsided - and that can preclude pictures from ever
being reviewed by the judges who might actually be more even handed.
So here I am a
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery voting
Ideally, it would be nice if they could have the artists vote on lots
of shots and then have the judges vote on the same shots. Those that
show similar picks to what the judges like would be best
Quite frankly, I think the entire process of peer judging is fatally flawed.
If Pentax wants to have a judged gallery, then they should be judging the
thing themselves, with qualified judges, not passing on the responsibility
to people of questionable or no qualification regarding judging
. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
2007/7/19, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all
A couple of weeks ago I uploaded 4 images to the Pentax Gallery.
When I checked about a week later, all had been moved to the
'Declined' section. A bit of a bummer but that's the way things go
- or so I thought.
A few
Hi all
A couple of weeks ago I uploaded 4 images to the Pentax Gallery. When I
checked about a week later, all had been moved to the 'Declined' section. A
bit of a bummer but that's the way things go - or so I thought.
A few days later I found 3 had been moved back to the Ready for Review
. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
2007/7/19, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all
A couple of weeks ago I uploaded 4 images to the Pentax Gallery. When I
checked about a week later, all had been moved to the 'Declined' section. A
bit of a bummer but that's the way things go - or so I thought.
A few
2007/7/19, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/PESO/mimosa.html
Nice pic. The needle's eye is narrowing at the Pentax Online Gallery
(POG, anyone?).
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I asked Pentax Carolyn about the return of images to Ready for Review
from Declined.
Her answer is that if you had an image declined in the last week, it
was due to a bug in their program which chose highly rated images to
be mistakenly declined. Those that were not immediately deleted, were
moved
Thanks for forwarding this, Jack.
Jostein
2007/7/19, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I asked Pentax Carolyn about the return of images to Ready for Review
from Declined.
Her answer is that if you had an image declined in the last week, it
was due to a bug in their program which chose highly
Whoops, I just reread your post and it makes sense now.
On 7/19/07, Cymen Vig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to tell when a photo was declined? I have one in my
account and I'm unsure if it was declined yesterday or during the
repost week.
Thanks
On 7/19/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL
Is there a way to tell when a photo was declined? I have one in my
account and I'm unsure if it was declined yesterday or during the
repost week.
Thanks
On 7/19/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked Pentax Carolyn about the return of images to Ready for Review
from Declined.
Her
I don't see any changes in my status. I like the quick yes no voting
system, as a reward I would like to see how my votes compare with the
judges (for fun and education).
On 7/17/07, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a yes/no question, really, but if you have particular
experiences, I'm
I submitted a number since this system was implemented, I noticed that
some were declined rather quickly but those on review seems to have
been there for a while. My hunch is those declined were voted out by
popular opinion and those on review were those which passed and are
now awaiting final
Just a yes/no question, really, but if you have particular
experiences, I'm curious.
Thanks,
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No evidence of it yet.
Jack
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a yes/no question, really, but if you have particular
experiences, I'm curious.
Thanks,
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It seems to have sped up rejections, but has had no effect on some of
my images. I'm guessing that there is some number of negatives that
will eventually throw it out of consideration. As there is some
number of positives that keeps in under consideration. Once those
numbers have been met, the
That's my impression too, Bruce. I haven't submitted anything since
before the voting started, but I had images in for evaluation at that
time. Some declined, some still awaits final judgement.
If our guess is right, it means that the judges restrict their
material to what's been approved by
If they wanted to do it properly, they should monitor the popular vote
of each individual to see if they tend to vote in a similar manner to
the judges. If they see enough consistency with specific individuals,
then they could rely on the rejection of the popular vote. But that
would take much
I had a couple of re-instated pics too, so I asked them.
Their reply (in just a couple of hours, good response time) explained
an early bug that mistakenly declined photos that got lots of
thumbs-up from the voters. As you say, they got back in the Waiting
For Review category the day after. So
On 7/12/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With every screen, up to three images are the same as the previous
screen and must be voted on again in order to 'submit' the votes. When
three of the five offered are re-votes, I find I lose interest fairly
quickly.
Too bad this glitch is
Got 10 more pics through the process a couple of days ago. By then,
they had been sitting there for a little more than 2 weeks.
So far, I've uploaded 10 images at a time. When they review them, they
take all in one go. I've sometimes wondered whether this affects the
acceptance percentage. At the
I've been offering a few at a time due to the slow review rate.
Jack
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got 10 more pics through the process a couple of days ago. By then,
they had been sitting there for a little more than 2 weeks.
So far, I've uploaded 10 images at a time. When they
AlunFoto wrote:
Got 10 more pics through the process a couple of days ago. By then,
they had been sitting there for a little more than 2 weeks.
So far, I've uploaded 10 images at a time. When they review them, they
take all in one go. I've sometimes wondered whether this affects the
2007/6/2, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
_Definitely_ not worth me even trying, then.
C'mon!
Boost some confidence, Mike.
I know you can get your share of that pie if you want to.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Wondering if others have had work awaiting review for awhile. I have an
on hold that I'd guess has been in that status for about three weeks.
I, also, have others awaiting review, some of which must have been sent
a week and a half ago. Are they reading Hoya/Pentax releases and
awaiting
Yup. Had this one photo sitting there waiting and ready for review
for the last 3 weeks. That's the longest so far (I now submit one at
a time, waiting for it to be accepted or declined before submitting
another one).
And, yeah, wondering too if the Hoya takeover has anything to do with it...
Yes - I've had several images waiting for review for a couple of weeks.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wondering if others have had work awaiting review
I saw some activity on a waiting for review pic last week. I have one
now that had been accepted, but I deleted it because I wasn't happy.
It's waiting for review. They have a lot to do. I doubt that the
acquisition has anything to do with it. (I did see your smileys:-).
Paul
On May 31,
Yes, I also have photos waiting for 2 weeks or more..Joe
At 06:11 PM 5/31/07, you wrote:
Wondering if others have had work awaiting review for awhile. I have an
on hold that I'd guess has been in that status for about three weeks.
I, also, have others awaiting review, some of which must have
This note may have been on the Pentax Gallery Artists Pages for awhile,
but I just noticed it:
Your approved photos are now publicly viewable at:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/jackdavis;
Status change? Screen still indicates Beta status.
Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This note may have been on the Pentax Gallery Artists Pages for awhile,
but I just noticed it:
Your approved photos are now publicly viewable at:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/jackdavis;
Status change? Screen still indicates Beta status.
Jack
Mine came up the same way under my name of course.
I think they're simply hmmm doing what we the programmers call work ;-).
Boris
Jack Davis wrote:
This note may have been on the Pentax Gallery Artists Pages for awhile,
but I just noticed it:
Your approved photos are now publicly viewable
Nice looking photo's. Jack!
What is a Polar Pivot ?
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Polar bear doing water pivots in its zoo pool. Orientation: its nose is
pointing straight up.
It would dive to the bottom of the pool and shoot up spinning its head
as it cleared the water.
I've had others ask. what the heck is that?
Thanks for comments
Jack
--- Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone on the list had trouble logging into the gallery to upload
photos. I tried last night and this morning to log in, but it says to
me unknown user no such e-mail or password. Also does anyone have a
contact name and e-mail address of some one who takes care of the
gallery..Thanks Joe
All of a sudden, Pentax Gallery doesn't recognize either my email
address or artist's code.
Anyone else or is just me? ;)
Jack
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail
Me too.
Jack
--- J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone on the list had trouble logging into the gallery to upload
photos. I tried last night and this morning to log in, but it says to
me unknown user no such e-mail or password. Also does anyone have a
contact name and e-mail address of
Yeah, it the submission page seems to be down.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of a sudden, Pentax Gallery doesn't recognize either my email
address or artist's code.
Anyone else or is just me? ;)
Jack
Thanks, Paul.
I was curious about an on hold I've had for awhile.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it the submission page seems to be down.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of a sudden, Pentax Gallery doesn't
PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it the submission page seems to be down.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of a sudden, Pentax Gallery doesn't recognize either my email
address or artist's code.
Anyone else or is just me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it the submission page seems to be down.
I hope this is because they're moving it to another server or otherwise
preparing for going live. Whatever server it's been running on up to
now has barely had the capacity for handling submissions and the casual
browsing
It's back online. Feels faster...from my side of the world :-)
Bong
On 5/11/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it the submission page seems to be down.
I hope this is because they're moving it to another server or otherwise
preparing for going live.
After the work in Photoshop, you need to use the save as function, not
save.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax gallery rejection
I submitted a couple of photos taken with a istD camera and they were
not accepted because they could not read
need to use the save as
function, not
save.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax gallery rejection
I submitted a couple of photos taken with a istD camera and they were
not accepted because they could not read the Exif info. I cropped
600 points @ 72 dpi = 600 pixels.
On May 2, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I assume you mean pixels, not points.
G
On May 2, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Were they sized correctly? They have to be 600 points tall, not 600
points on the long side. That, of course, is
Ah, missed that detail.
Don't know why you would give sizing in points, though, except for
fonts.
G
On May 3, 2007, at 3:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
600 points @ 72 dpi = 600 pixels.
On May 2, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I assume you mean pixels, not points.
G
On May
: Re: Pentax gallery rejection
To remove the EXIF data, he would have to use Save for Web. Save
As won't help. But i think he should try resubmitting with the EXIF
data intact. I'm guessing there was some other problem, perhaps sizing.
Paul
On May 3, 2007, at 2:15 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote
first few submissions were that way. Pentax has info
on the
gallery site to overcome this by using save as.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax gallery rejection
To remove the EXIF data, he would have to use Save
that
didn't have
exif data. My first few submissions were that way. Pentax has info
on the
gallery site to overcome this by using save as.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax gallery rejection
To remove the EXIF data, he would
I submitted a couple of photos taken with a istD camera and they were
not accepted because they could not read the Exif info. I cropped the
photos in Photoshop and adjusted the color balance, etc. The reason
was because they did not see the firmware..So I resubmitted them as
scanned images and
If you submit them as scanned photos, there cannot be any exif data in
them. Do Save for Web - that strips it out.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, May 2, 2007, 4:50:42 PM, you wrote:
J I submitted a couple of photos taken with a istD camera and they were
J not accepted because they could not read the
501 - 600 of 903 matches
Mail list logo
