Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Hello, On 08/04/2002 03:35 PM, Maxim Maletsky wrote: > I feel like you want Zend to develop things for free like they develop > Zend Engine. I think it is right for them selling Zend Encoder and IDE. > Companies still trust these products more than the free packages you > mentioned. Do not forget, PHP is running on Zend. I do not want Zend to develop things for free. I never said that. As a matter of fact I do not want to use Zend commercial products at all, precisely because their pricing is greedy. That is my opinion and so is the opinion of many other PHP users. The problem is not being commercial, the problem is being expensive. I have an brain and use it to make decisions that defend my interests. So it seems that Yahoo people that decided to use Nick Lindrige PHP Accelerator instead of Zend Cache. > There is really a lot of money involved in developments. If, by some > means, I would need to hide a source, I would look at my business model, > and, if I got extra $3.000 budgeted to spend on development I will spend > them for Zend Encoder instead of resorting to Open Source protecting > solutions. Because, the product to protect my intellectual property > would be chosen by the responsibility of its manufacture. Maxim, be serious, you do not have to pay that sort of money to compile programs in other languages, why do you keep forcing the excuse to pay that fortune to Zend? I am sure that many of us are not idiots to pay that fortune to Zend, especially now when have free alternatives. > I think you will agree with me, Open Source is a high quality code, but > its support is not. Open Source is never supported with the > business-level responsibility as Zend would do. Honestly I don't want support from greedy companies like Zend. If you go and examine their pricing you see that they charge for every little thing. The only thing that that don't charge is the Zend Optimizer. But the truth is, if you have complex scripts, if you do not use a cache engine as well, using Zend optimizer makes your scripts run slower because the optimizer itself takes a lot of time to analyse complex scripts and in the end often it does not pay using the optimizer if the results are not cached. Make your benchmarks with complex scripts and you will see what I am talking about. So, the only thing that is "free" from Zend is something that makes you wish even more the cache product that is bloody expensive. It took me some time to realize that. Some day I realized that some users were using mirror scripts that made many requests to a site of mine and I noticed that PHP was consuming an huge ammount of CPU time. I was suggested by a open source cache extension developer that using the optiomizer without a cache makes your PHP scripts hog the CPU. I turned Zend Optimizer off and it turned out to be true. I never used Zend Optimizer again. I use APC cache and the speedup is tremendous although it is said that Nick Lindrige PHP Accelerator is much faster matching Zend Cache performance. > About Zend CEO. I personally have attended a business meeting with Doron > (CEO) and Zeev in Tokyo last year in June. And, I must tell you, we all > had very good impression of them. Of course, when you pay they will treat you nicely. It seems that when you refuse to pay they become unreasonable. > If, Manuel, what they do does not make you happy - that is only your > opinion. Sure, mine and of many others. I also think it is stupid to exclude Acer because he has different opinions than yours. Anyway, do you agree that Zeev is right by boycotting APC people to contribute with they cache extension? If you do, you are just defending their monopoly, and so I do not have nothing else to say to you. > Just remember, that, the future e-business will not consist of software > development, but of its support. And Zend primarely supports PHP. Do you work for Zend? I'm sorry but it surely looks like you do because you are trying are to make them look good. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Vote to ban Acer
Hello, If there is anybody that should be banned are those that promote the descrimination of individuals just because they have different opinions, just like you are doing. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] defining separate form element within While statment
Hi,
I'm having trouble passing "$the_score" to "edit_s1_php3":
// Display the scores
while ( $row = mysql_fetch_array($result) ) {
echo( "" . "" .
$row["last_name"] . " , " . $row["first_name"] . "" .
$row["s1"] . " "
. "
edit score" ."" .
$row["s2"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s3"] . " "
."
edit score" . " " .
$row["s4"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s5"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s6"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s7"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s8"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s9"] . " "
. "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s10"] . " " . "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s11"] . " " . "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s12"] . " " . "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s13"] . " " . "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s14"] . " " . "
edit score" . "" .
$row["s15"] . " " . "
edit score". "");
}
I'm pretty sure it's because I don't have the form action defined.. however,
each input goes to a diffent action. How do I do this?
Thanks In Advance,
Jim
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] RegEx (back referencing)
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 05:03:36PM +0100, Phil Ewington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am am writing a function to color code and indent JavaScript source using
> regular expressions and cannot seem to get back referencing working.
What you're using isn't "back referencing," it's utilizing "substrings."
Back referencing is when you bring the substrings back into the regular
expression definition.
> $string = eregi_replace("<(/?)(scr[^>]*)>", "«font color=maroon»\1«/font»",
> $string);
Here's what your command asks PHP to do: Find any opening or
closing script tag and replace it with "«font color=maroon»\1«/font»."
That's not what you intend. Let's make a test script:
java is dumb end';
$string = eregi_replace("<(/?)(scr[^>]*)>",
"«font color=maroon»\1«/font»", $string);
echo "$string\n";
?>
This is what comes out:
begin «font color=maroon»«/font»java is dumb«font color=maroon»«/font»
end
First off, if you want to utilize substrings, you need to use two
backslashes. "\\1" instead of "\1". Second, \\1 refers to the first
parenthesized part of the pattern, which in the pattern you set up is the
forward slash at the beginning of the script tag. So, let's modify the
pattern accordingly and see what happens:
$string = eregi_replace("<(/?)(scr[^>]*)>",
"«font color=maroon»\\1«/font»", $string);
Creates:
begin «font color=maroon»«/font»java is dumb«font color=maroon»/«/font»
end
But, that's still not what you intend. I think you're really looking to
surround the scripts with maroon font tags. To do that, you need to tweak
the expression to grab the script tags, the script itself and the closing
script tag.
$string = eregi_replace('(]*>[^<]*)',
'\\1', $string);
Outputs:
begin java is dumb end
Notice the use of ' rather than ", which saves a little processor time by
not evaluaing the strings for variables.
One final improvement. Font tags are obnoxious. They cause problems for
people that choose their own background colors in their browsers. Read
http://www.analysisandsolutions.com/code/weberror.htm?ft=y for more info
on that. Anyway, I suggest using Cascading Style Sheets,
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1, for the colroing instead:
$string = eregi_replace('(]*>[^<]*)',
'\\1', $string);
echo "code.js {color: maroon;}\n";
echo "$string\n";
Yields:
code.js {color: maroon;}
begin java is dumb end
Voila!
--Dan
--
PHP classes that make web design easier
SQL Solution | Layout Solution | Form Solution
sqlsolution.info | layoutsolution.info | formsolution.info
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
4015 7 Av #4AJ, Brooklyn NY v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Manuel, I feel like you want Zend to develop things for free like they develop Zend Engine. I think it is right for them selling Zend Encoder and IDE. Companies still trust these products more than the free packages you mentioned. Do not forget, PHP is running on Zend. There is really a lot of money involved in developments. If, by some means, I would need to hide a source, I would look at my business model, and, if I got extra $3.000 budgeted to spend on development I will spend them for Zend Encoder instead of resorting to Open Source protecting solutions. Because, the product to protect my intellectual property would be chosen by the responsibility of its manufacture. I think you will agree with me, Open Source is a high quality code, but its support is not. Open Source is never supported with the business-level responsibility as Zend would do. About Zend CEO. I personally have attended a business meeting with Doron (CEO) and Zeev in Tokyo last year in June. And, I must tell you, we all had very good impression of them. If, Manuel, what they do does not make you happy - that is only your opinion. Just remember, that, the future e-business will not consist of software development, but of its support. And Zend primarely supports PHP. Regards, Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Hello, On 08/04/2002 11:55 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Just a couple of facts: > > 1. If Zend did not exist, PHP 4 wouldn't have existed, at least not in > any way similar to what PHP 4 looks like today. FYI, with PHP 3, it was > impossible to write accelerators, encoders, debuggers and whatnot. You're assumption is completely wrong because if you guys would never existed or contributed to PHP, somebody else would have done it. You are definetly not the only ones in the universe that could have developed a better PHP engine. PHP already was popular before PHP 4. Chances are that somebody else could have done the same or better then your Zend engine. > There are 3 million PHP based web sites in the world. Only a fragment > of them use accelerators or encoders, and you know something? They're > doing pretty darn well. There are plenty of other uses for PHP than the Web, despite you do not want to promote PHP for that. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
On 08/04/2002 04:08 AM, Justin French wrote: > on 04/08/02 3:55 PM, Acer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >>so fine zend is ripping people off, what's the point? well it has been >>damaging to php is my point. no one knows what php is and no one will pay >>you to do php. why blame zend on this? no matter what rasmus says that 600 >>people have access to the cvs, php is zend and zend is php. > > > I don't believe Zend's charging for commerical extensions to the product has > harmed it in any way. I also don't believe that Zend is ripping people off. Except that Zeev blocked APC people from contributing with their open source cache extension to PHP. Therefore, Zend business practices are harmful PHP development. > You have no way of telling if any competitive product does as good a job, > and furthermore, since the *one product you found* is in beta, then the > argument is totally shallow. It depends. Yahoo was certainly able to decide that Nick's PHP Accelerator was a better solution than Zend Cache. Why can't Nick's PHP Encoder be better than Zend Encoder? > PHP has made a massive indentation into the server-side scripting world in > just a few years, and I get emailed about jobs and contracts ALL THE TIME > that want me to use it. You are missing the point. One thing is living from the applications you develop in PHP, another thing is living from developing in PHP for other people. Some people have better vocation to do the first and would prefer to do it for all their lives, but to market your applications you need to be able to protect your code from pirates and competitors or else you would have no business. > Furthermore, perhaps the reason why you can't get anyone to pay you is (no > insult intended): > > - your poor communication skills > - your lack of any real programming experience > - your lack of experience in the right projects / skills > - you're not looking in the right places > - you're only looking at advertised work, not creating a job You are missing his point and you are being rude to point deficiencies to him that may well be attributed to you. > None of this is Zend's fault, and switching to ASP, or having Zend give away > the encoder will not fix any of this. You make me laugh. I don't think the point is having Zend Encoder for free. The point is being able to protect PHP code for free like you can with other languages. It does not have to be with Zend products. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Hello, On 08/03/2002 10:49 PM, Justin French wrote: >>Don't get me wrong rasmus, I don't have any problems with you. It's just >>fishy when some guy in the UK was able to put together a php accelerator for >>free and a php encoder for $0.50 a pop while zend is charging several >>thousands. You have to wonder how much work zend is actually putting into >>their products to justify the price. Plus, these guys are the ones building >>php so something is not right. > > > Zend is a commercial company, and has a right to charge for a product. My > guess is that the developers of the Zend engine (PHP) would also make the > best developers of any other product (like an accelerator or encoder) that > is associated with PHP. You're guess is biased. Do you know that Yahho have choosen Nick Lindrige PHP Accelerator cache extension instead of Zend's? > If someone is charging so little for the product (it is Beta, so I wouldn't > use it anyway), then there is a good *chance* that it's a far less superior > product. Excuse me but that is an ignorant criteria. Basically you are saying that quality is proportional to the price. In that case you deserved to be exploited by Zend or whoever charges more from you. > Let me ask you Acer, how much money do you make a week from developing PHP > web applications with the free PHP scripting language? The $2000 doesn't > seem like much in comparison, does it. I think you need to open your horizon and understand that not everybody lives in the same country as you and does not necessarily have the same kind of opportunities to make money. Anyway, I think it is stupid to pay for a PHP compiler when you do not have to pay for compilers in other languages. That is one more reason for some people to drop PHP. That is not my case, I prefer to stick to PHP and contribute for free PHP compilers be made available and everybody knows about them. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Hello, On 08/03/2002 10:44 PM, Justin French wrote: >>>The people for Zend have to eat to live. >> >>And don't we all? That is the main problem. If we need to pay USD $3,000 >>to be able to compile our PHP programs, doesn't that make not viable for >>most of us to sell our PHP programs as closed source? > > > How much money do you make a week writing PHP scripts? Just remember, Zend > gave you PHP, for free, to use in almost any commercial way you wish. I don't live from writing PHP scripts, that is the problem. I give away many PHP scripts often in the form of ready to use PHP Classes, but besides from that I have plenty of sophisticated code that I am not interested to give away in Open Source because I would be disclosing the know-how that is embedded in it. That is regardless whether I wanted to give or sell the code. I also know many people that would like to protect their PHP code so their ISPs could not peek on it. > My clients cant afford Zend, but when the right client comes along, it'll be > my recommendation without hesitation. That is your problem. Most people I know are like your clients, they can't afford the greedy prices of Zend. I often recommend using APC in MMAP mode that automatically stores compiled files in disk, so you can protect their source code for free. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Acer, In case you didn't know: Zeev Suraski and Andi Gutmans made PHP4 out of PHP3 (correct the details if you wish). Then, they founded Zend (ZEev aNDi) and run it successfully. Two guys always religiously contribute to PHP. Their role in PHP project is of an IMMENSE (no, words are not enough to describe it) value, and they do it for free. So, as you can see, with or without Zend, PHP would exist. But, I am pretty sure that, without Zend, PHP4 would never make it to the level it is on right now. Zend is, indeed, a company that keeps the commercial balance to the PHP Open Source project. Lots of times, companies ask for customer support and additional libraries/extensions to the PHP programming language. Who was supposed to do that? The 600 developers for free? No, we left Zend doing it, and in exchange, Zend is powering every world's PHP installation up. See, Acer, it works! If, Acer, you really need a PHP job, tell your headhunter that Zend exists, so that ignorant headhunter will trust PHP better. Do you have any idea of the billions of dollars that were made with PHP around the world? I myself run a national-level project for the Italian Government. Weve got dozens of PHP people involved for 2 years which is the duration of the project. You cannot even feel the immensity of PHP. And, ironically, PHP Dev Group still asks for free FTP mirrors. Now, please, poor soul Acer, make us all happy - stop offending this mailing list. Unfortunately, your messages pop-up on our eyes while reading this mailing list hopping to help someone in trouble. Your senseless typing only makes us hate you. Ciao, Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Acer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 5:13 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: Justin French; php > Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding > > Okay like I said before, Zeev is agreeing with me that php is zend and > zend > is php. However, if zend dropped off the face of the planet, there would > be > programmers to fill that void. > > Again call me a cynic but zend develops php but if you pay them several > thousand then it will run 4 times faster. Wow that's great. So let's not > put that much effort into php and make it run faster if you pay. No > conflict of interest there. > > Wow 3 million sites, that's a lot. How many of those actually get more > then > 1000 visitors? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: August 4, 2002 10:55 AM > To: Acer > Cc: Justin French; php > Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding > > > Just a couple of facts: > > 1. If Zend did not exist, PHP 4 wouldn't have existed, at least not in > any > way similar to what PHP 4 looks like today. FYI, with PHP 3, it was > impossible to write accelerators, encoders, debuggers and whatnot. > > 2. Zend published its value-add software *2 years* ago, when it was > really > innovative. The fact some of its key products were since copied by the > freeware community doesn't mean that they would have existed in the first > place. > > An opinion: > > Like others pointed out, your assertion that in order to use PHP in a > production environment you HAVE to have an encoder or an accelerator is > ridiculous. If I gave you a set of patches that doubles the speed of PHP, > but offer a commercial product that quadruples it, you'd still be pissed > and say that you HAVE to pay in order to use PHP in a production > environment, wouldn't you? > > And finally, another fact: > > There are 3 million PHP based web sites in the world. Only a fragment of > them use accelerators or encoders, and you know something? They're doing > pretty darn well. > > Zeev > > At 16:45 04/08/2002, Acer wrote: > >Okay let me clarify, I think that if Zend did not exist then php would be > in > >a better position. Why? Because something like php-encoder would of > filled > >the void sooner and everyone would of benefited from encoders and > >accelerators. > > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Hello, On 08/03/2002 03:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Because it is a silly thread and I shouldn't be replying at all. Others > in the group either have more sense or have given up on answering > php-general questions. I believe the point is that you always be passive when it comes to initiatives that interfere with Zend business. Where were you when Zeev publically boycotted the offer of APC author to integrate his cache extension in PHP? If you can't speak on this, we will know that you are still passively favouring Zend business. > My view on encoders is that they are unnecessary and rather evil. I would > never ever purchase a php-based application that did not come with the php That is your oppinion of course. > source code. If you want to restrict your code somehow, do it through a > license. People who choose to violate that license are the same people This is a joke right? Are you familiar with Richard Stallman? You certainly sound like him? The fact is that when you give the source of a product of your work, not only you are giving the code, but also the know-how that was envolved in the development of that code. Licensing code providing the source means that you are giving the know-how too. Anybody with that source can rebuild a new product with the know how that was learned and you hardly can demonstrate that the licensee only got the know-how because they got the source. So, licensing and giving the source is a ridiculously innefficient solution to protect the product of your work. That is why Zend closed the source of the commercial products that thay sell and you do not seem to have a problem with them today. So why do you object to people intention to protect their PHP scripts source and don't object to have Zend selling closed source products based on PHP? It seems your objections are inconsistent because you are passively admiting that Zend can make money from closed source products but other people can't. > who will hack your encoded scripts anyway. And this way the honest > customers will have the benefit of the code to customize, learn from, In the real world, many customers are not that honest and obviously can cause a great harm to software business that is based on selling products with Open Source. > build on top of. Closed source stuff stifles innovation and I personally > refuse to work on a PHP encoder for this reason. Imagine if I had never > released the source for PHP? We would not be having this discussion > today. That was your decision. It is not fair to impose it to others. The most popular language in the world is Visual Basic. The reason for that is that it made possible for many individuals to develop applications and sell them so they could make a living from that activity. Despite of that, Visual Basic is itself a closed source product. The important point of this is products are successful when they help people to survive from them. Being open or closed source has little to do with the success of software. Opening the source of a programming is a compromise. It may lead to the success of a program or not. See how many Open Source projects are rotten in Sourceforge to realize that it is not making products Open Source that will lead to their automatic success. > I know plenty of people disagree with this view, but there you have it. OTOH there are plenty of people that completely agree. You would have much more to gain to understand both sides instead of pushing for one side only. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
php-general Digest 4 Aug 2002 17:32:16 -0000 Issue 1505
php-general Digest 4 Aug 2002 17:32:16 - Issue 1505 Topics (messages 111045 through 111074): Re: Protect PHP coding 111045 by: Acer 111046 by: Michael Geier 111047 by: Acer 111049 by: Justin French 111053 by: David Freeman 111054 by: Jason Wong 111058 by: . Edwin 111059 by: Duncan Hill 111063 by: Acer 111064 by: Acer 111065 by: Acer 111066 by: Justin French 111067 by: Zeev Suraski 111068 by: Acer 111070 by: Zeev Suraski 111072 by: Maxim Maletsky 111074 by: Manuel Lemos which function can do so ? 111048 by: Ryan 111050 by: php . banana 111051 by: Andrew Brampton 111052 by: Justin French mysql_connect 111055 by: Mantas Kriauciunas 111056 by: Paul Dale Re: Decode email 111057 by: Paul Roberts Session problem with https 111060 by: Andre Dubuc Re: alternative to phpadsnew? 111061 by: Andrey PHP/MySQL Error Log Parser 111062 by: Paul Maine Mkdir! 111069 by: Georgie Casey Upgraded to 4.2.2 on Win2k - server (including ASP) crashing 111071 by: Jack Baty Re: May i? 111073 by: Manuel Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- Begin Message --- this all started when rasmus had a problem with the "click" in my original post and i think i proved that if you are a member of the php development you better not stray from what the php gods think or else you will get hanged in public or even banned or ignored. then i suggested that zend isn't really doing much to "develop" an encoder or accelerator since one guy has been able to do the same thing and rasmus is like of course not silly if microsoft sold their products for what they cost it would be $0.02. so fine zend is ripping people off, what's the point? well it has been damaging to php is my point. no one knows what php is and no one will pay you to do php. why blame zend on this? no matter what rasmus says that 600 people have access to the cvs, php is zend and zend is php. after that is when all the little minions started acting tough so that the cool kids would like them better. here's the original post that i made, maybe people should reread it: --- There is a free php accelerator so I don't know why you would pay for one. www.php-accelerator.co.uk The same guy (Nick) has also just made an encoder. It is in beta testing right now and there's no windows version yet but that should be coming soon. I think it's like $0.50 to encode your program which is much more affordable. http://www.php-encoder.com I think the problem with zend is that they have put up the guise that php is an opensource project but to actually use it in production you had to pay several thousands every year for the accelerator and the encoder. It kinda feels like a bait and switch to me which is why I personally think zend is bad for php. Just do a search for jobs for asp, cf or jsp. There are a ton of jobs for these languages and you would be lucky to find one for a php developer. So zend rakes in the money and does no real marketing with that money for php is the way I see it. You'll never hear anything from the core php group since they are a tight click so it's business as usual. Now that Nick has released the free accelerator and an inexpensive ($0.50 per shot) encoder it might change but I don't know if it's too late. -Original Message- From: Maxim Maletsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 4, 2002 1:26 AM To: 'Acer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding It hurts no one. Believe me. Do what. Download PHP package and put it on sale. We'll let you do that by our license. Actually, yeah, here I go - YOU CAN DO IT RIGHT NOW. 600 people worked hard on PHP for over several years and thousands of servers do us the real-life test. Just sell it. Will we get hurt? Ufff whata pain Maxim Maletsky > -Original Message- > From: Acer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 7:06 AM > To: César Aracena; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding > > the truth hurts sometimes. > > this was dropped a long time ago but you people keep bringing it up and > giving your 2 cents. thanks cesar, you can read my mind. > > > > -Original Message- > From: César Aracena [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: August 4, 2002 12:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding > > > I am pretty new to PHP, but not to computing since I've been working > with them for about 15 years and I would like to say something about > this idiotic spamming subject. > > It's your problem if you get short
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Hello, On 08/03/2002 01:58 PM, Acer wrote: > There is a free php accelerator so I don't know why you would pay for one. > www.php-accelerator.co.uk > > The same guy (Nick) has also just made an encoder. It is in beta testing > right now and there's no windows version yet but that should be coming soon. > I think it's like $0.50 to encode your program which is much more > affordable. > http://www.php-encoder.com You can also use APC cache extension in MMAP mode and when you run each script for the first time it stores the compiled files on disk. From then on you can delete the original sources as they are no longer needed. There is no need to pay for that. I alaways recommend APC to protect the source code to anybody because you do not even have to change any part of source code to use it. APC is available here: http://apc.communityconnect.com/ BCompiler is a new PECL extension that is based on APC and you can download it for free here: http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=95 So, there is really no need to pay at all. > I think the problem with zend is that they have put up the guise that php is > an opensource project but to actually use it in production you had to pay > several thousands every year for the accelerator and the encoder. It kinda You probably have no idea how right you are! :) Did you know that APC cache extension was developed because Zend wanted to charge a fortune to license Zend Cache to be used in a large cluster, but the company that has the cluster was not willing to pay that much? The funny part is that Zend CEO was so greedy that he refused to make a significant discount. Of course the company with the cluster refused to pay the absurd ammount of money that Zend charged. So, it seems that Zend CEO was so brilliant that challenged them to develop a Cache extension for free, and guess what, they did? hehehehehehehheheh Not only Zend people is greed as they seem so arrogant that they really think nobody can have developed the things they did. They probably think they are gods! Some customers probably believe that so they pay the fabulous fortunes that they charge! Anyway, if it was my company, I would have certainly fired that CEO for challenging somebody to develop a competing product, even more for free. > feels like a bait and switch to me which is why I personally think zend is > bad for php. Just do a search for jobs for asp, cf or jsp. There are a ton > of jobs for these languages and you would be lucky to find one for a php > developer. So zend rakes in the money and does no real marketing with that > money for php is the way I see it. Yes, I completely agree with you. Zend was good for having developed Zend engine but at the same time they cripple further development by not allowing Open Source cache/encoding extensions to be included in PHP. Once APC author publicly offered to integrate APC extension in PHP and the only response that he got was a stupid excuse from Zeev to not do it. > You'll never hear anything from the core php group since they are a tight > click so it's business as usual. Now that Nick has released the free > accelerator and an inexpensive ($0.50 per shot) encoder it might change but > I don't know if it's too late. You are also very right when you claim that other core developers have admited that by passively allowing Zend people to boycott the addition of an Open Source cache extension that can also be used for encoding scripts. Only them can explain the real reasons, but active or passively they are favouring Zend business, thus crippling further PHP development. As for Nick encoder I also agree that is probably too late for him to make money because there are free encoding extensions and like his they are not built-in PHP. Anyway, once Nick told me that he would not mind integrating his cache/encoding extension into PHP if the PHP developers (read Zend people) were not blocking it. He also told me about the interest to develop a PHP to C compiler which is way better than Zend Encoder because that would be really hard, if viable at all to reverse engineer. That would make PHP match other languages offer of real compilers either in protection terms and speed. -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: May i?
You can reset the id with this command: ALTER TABLE $tablename AUTO_INCREMENT = 242 : : Flavio Bastos Amiel: : : : : : INVALID_ADDRESS_IN_GROUP@.SYNTAX-ERROR., :"::: Flavio Bastos Amiel::>" wrote:let's see if i can do it... i got a news site. everything was going OKsometimes i made few testing and then i delete the content from the db... the problem is next: the item "id" is an auto_increment element .. so the id's wasn't going allrightbecause they where not true... sometimes they make jumps like id #25 and the id #30 (because of the testing i've done and then delete) i tried to delete that cell (id) and then i recreate it. thinking the id was going to count it all over and make the item id TRUE.but it wasn't like that, the "new" id was counting since the last id then if the last id was 100, the new id was counting from 100 to 200 do i explain myself?... does anyone have an answer to this problem (PLEASE Dont tell me i have to do i manually!! ) thanks, Flavio Bastos Amiel "George Nicolae" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ask. > > -- > > > Best regards, > George Nicolae > IT Manager > ___ > PaginiWeb.com - Professional Web Design > www.PaginiWeb.com > > > "::: Flavio Bastos Amiel::>" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > May i ask for help about a subejct on MySQL here? > > > > thanks, > > Flavio Bastos Amiel > > > > > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php ~ Manuel Ochoa ~ Seven days is too long to wait for a gun! - Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
> No we shouldn't criticise a commerical company because I never hear bad > things about Microsoft on here. Read archives :-) Maxim Maletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Upgraded to 4.2.2 on Win2k - server (including ASP) crashing
I upgraded from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2 on Win2000 running IIS. I immediately starting having problems with IIS hanging after a few requests. I tried all sorts of nonsense and its only got worse. In desperation, I copied all of the dll's in the php distribution into /winnt/system32, overwriting the existing files. Now I've got php running fine, but as soon as any *php* page is accessed, ASP pages stop responding. Actually, they do respond with this: -2147417842 (0x8001010e). Restarting IIS clears it up until the next php page loads. Any ideas? The ASP folks developing on the server are getting (understandably) irritable. -- Jack Baty Fusionary Media - http://www.fusionary.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
At 18:12 04/08/2002, Acer wrote: >Okay like I said before, Zeev is agreeing with me that php is zend and zend >is php. However, if zend dropped off the face of the planet, there would be >programmers to fill that void. No, I am not. Zend was a key figure in the development of PHP, without which PHP wouldn't have been what it is today. Arguably, PHP would have not existed at all. Today, Zend continues to take a key role in the development of PHP's infrastructure, which is then used by a dozen or so developers who actually develop PHP itself, which in turn is used by those 600 people with CVS accounts that Rasmus mentioned, that help out in the manual, PEAR, and other projects. Will there be someone to replace Andi's work on the engine if he fell off the planet? I hope we don't live to see it for ourselves, because I don't think you would have liked the result. Also, don't put words in my mouth. I'm the first person to say that PHP != Zend, PHP is PHP and Zend is Zend. >Again call me a cynic but zend develops php but if you pay them several >thousand then it will run 4 times faster. Wow that's great. So let's not >put that much effort into php and make it run faster if you pay. No >conflict of interest there. I guess that's why Zend people constantly improved the performance of PHP. >Wow 3 million sites, that's a lot. How many of those actually get more then >1000 visitors? Just one, yours. Poor chap. Zeev -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Mkdir!
When I create directories in PHP through the mkdir() command, what number should I set the mode so I have the priveleges to delete the directory through FTP? I used to always set them to 777 but then when I try to delete the directories in FTP, it doesnt let me, and I have to write a PHP script that deletes the folders! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Okay like I said before, Zeev is agreeing with me that php is zend and zend is php. However, if zend dropped off the face of the planet, there would be programmers to fill that void. Again call me a cynic but zend develops php but if you pay them several thousand then it will run 4 times faster. Wow that's great. So let's not put that much effort into php and make it run faster if you pay. No conflict of interest there. Wow 3 million sites, that's a lot. How many of those actually get more then 1000 visitors? -Original Message- From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 4, 2002 10:55 AM To: Acer Cc: Justin French; php Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding Just a couple of facts: 1. If Zend did not exist, PHP 4 wouldn't have existed, at least not in any way similar to what PHP 4 looks like today. FYI, with PHP 3, it was impossible to write accelerators, encoders, debuggers and whatnot. 2. Zend published its value-add software *2 years* ago, when it was really innovative. The fact some of its key products were since copied by the freeware community doesn't mean that they would have existed in the first place. An opinion: Like others pointed out, your assertion that in order to use PHP in a production environment you HAVE to have an encoder or an accelerator is ridiculous. If I gave you a set of patches that doubles the speed of PHP, but offer a commercial product that quadruples it, you'd still be pissed and say that you HAVE to pay in order to use PHP in a production environment, wouldn't you? And finally, another fact: There are 3 million PHP based web sites in the world. Only a fragment of them use accelerators or encoders, and you know something? They're doing pretty darn well. Zeev At 16:45 04/08/2002, Acer wrote: >Okay let me clarify, I think that if Zend did not exist then php would be in >a better position. Why? Because something like php-encoder would of filled >the void sooner and everyone would of benefited from encoders and >accelerators. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Just a couple of facts: 1. If Zend did not exist, PHP 4 wouldn't have existed, at least not in any way similar to what PHP 4 looks like today. FYI, with PHP 3, it was impossible to write accelerators, encoders, debuggers and whatnot. 2. Zend published its value-add software *2 years* ago, when it was really innovative. The fact some of its key products were since copied by the freeware community doesn't mean that they would have existed in the first place. An opinion: Like others pointed out, your assertion that in order to use PHP in a production environment you HAVE to have an encoder or an accelerator is ridiculous. If I gave you a set of patches that doubles the speed of PHP, but offer a commercial product that quadruples it, you'd still be pissed and say that you HAVE to pay in order to use PHP in a production environment, wouldn't you? And finally, another fact: There are 3 million PHP based web sites in the world. Only a fragment of them use accelerators or encoders, and you know something? They're doing pretty darn well. Zeev At 16:45 04/08/2002, Acer wrote: >Okay let me clarify, I think that if Zend did not exist then php would be in >a better position. Why? Because something like php-encoder would of filled >the void sooner and everyone would of benefited from encoders and >accelerators. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
on 04/08/02 11:45 PM, Acer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Okay let me clarify, I think that if Zend did not exist then php would be in > a better position. Why? Because something like php-encoder would of filled > the void sooner and everyone would of benefited from encoders and > accelerators. Well, there ya go -- php-encoder is here now, so quit complaining about the price of Zend already. Sheeesh. > So far it really does feel like a bait and switch act since people develop > in php thinking it's opensource and then when it's not performing up to par > someone waves a flag to say "Hey you could give me several thousand dollars > and I'll make it work" PHP works, right out of the box. You don't NEED to have things encoded to make them work, and you don't NEED to have things accelerated -- at least not in 90% of the websites out there. Zend is a commercial company (with some ties to the PHP development team) offering a few commercial extensions to PHP. You have the choice of accepting the offered price, chosing a competitors product, or writing your own. PHP does not force or imply the use of Zend products, or restrict the availability of competing products (like php-encoder). If YOU don't want to use Zend, fine... I don't either. If YOU don't think Zend have a good business model or will sell enough encoders at the "high price", fine. If YOU want to use something else, or even write a competing product, fine... no one is stopping you. What are you actually complaining about? You're on your high-horse about opensource and all that, then you turn around and want to be able to encode your own product (written in PHP) to sell it for profit? Why are YOU allowed to make a profit out of PHP code and related products, but Zend are not? You are a commercial entity, and so are they. They chose to write and sell an encoder, accelerator, and other stuff, just as this other guy has, and you could. For f**k's sake just quit bitching about it to us. > Wow Justin gets a lot of job offers so that means there are a ton of jobs > for php developers. I feel better now. And thanks for reading my mind, > there's like 3 of you on this list. Do you do partys? Yup. I have no idea WTF you're saying here, but it sounds pretty immature, so I'll just say "grow up"... Justin French -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
No we shouldn't criticise a commerical company because I never hear bad things about Microsoft on here. -Original Message- From: David Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 4, 2002 3:54 AM To: 'Acer'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding I know I shouldn't do more to keep this going but I'll make this one, and only, post. > this all started when rasmus had a problem with the "click" > in my original post >From what I read, Rasmus made a correction to your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion, but perhaps you should learn that just because it _is_ your opinion it is neither automatically right nor going to be accepted by anyone else. > and i think i proved that if you are a member of the > php development you better not stray from what the php gods think or else > you will get hanged in public or even banned or ignored. I'm guessing that this is in reference to how you think you've been treated. As far as I can see, you've not been hanged in public, you've not been banned and, unfortunately, you've not been ignored either. I'd also suggest that there's a difference between having a differing opinion and trying to shove it down everyone elses throat. > then i suggested that zend isn't really doing much to > "develop" an encoder or accelerator since one guy has been able to do the same > thing Ummm, I really don't see your point here. Zend is doing what Zend chooses to do. Last I checked it's, largely, a free world and Zend is a commercial entity. They have written their particular tools and, by virtue of the fact that they wrote them they can decide how they want to market them. That they've decided to give part of it away for free (Zend engine in PHP) is their choice. I, for one, am glad they did. That they decided to retain control over another part of it (IDE, Optimiser etc) and sell that is also their choice. The price they set for it is also their choice since they created it in the first place. It is not my place, nor yours for that matter, to criticise Zend for what they may or may not do in the commercial market place. Why _should_ Zend do anything in particular to "develop" a php market? So you can get a job programming in PHP? Why is that their problem? > and rasmus is like of course not silly if microsoft sold their products > for what they cost it would be $0.02. I'm not even sure what your point is here... > so fine zend is ripping people off, what's the point? Are they? Were you forced to buy something from Zend? Was I? It's your free choice to spend money with Zend. If you don't then they haven't ripped you off. If you do, one presumes that you have because you see value in doing so. If _NOBODY_ purchases product from Zend then they are free to go broke or review their pricing - that's a commercial reality. > it has been damaging to php is my point. Really? Why is Zend to blame for this 'damage' to PHP? Because they aren't spending money advertising it? How do you know they aren't? I'd expect that Zend, like every other commercial entity, has an advertising budget. I'd expect that they spend money advertising themselves and their products. Are they also expected to spend money promoting php itself? Why? > no one knows what php is and no one will pay you to do php. Really? I've been paid to do php for clients. You point, I believe, was about number of job listings. I've honestly not looked - and I'm not in your part of the world anyway. Consider that a lack of job listings does not necessarily equate to a lack of paid work. Consider that a good many people earn money programming in PHP. Or are you bitter because you feel that you've wasted time learning to program in PHP and now can't get a job? If so, I can only suggest that you get more skills - the more multi-skilled you are the better your chances of employment. Either that or you could apply for jobs that want, for example, ASP and then sell them on the idea of doing the stuff in php instead. Isn't it your 'duty' to do this? If you don't aren't you just 'damaging' php? > no matter what rasmus says that 600 people have access to the > cvs, php is zend and zend is php. I neither claim to be an expert on php nor zend but it was my understanding that zend has contributed a reasonably significant key component of PHP. Even so, they are not the only source of php development. Many people contribute. Each of those people have some say in what happens. > after that is when all the little minions started acting > tough so that the cool kids would like them better. Ummm, ok, whatever... > here's the original post that i made, maybe people should reread it: > --- > There is a free php accelerator so I don't know why you > would pay for one. > www.php-accelerator.co.uk OK, so don't pay for one. I don't see anyone forcing you to pay for one. It's your choice. > The same guy (Nick) has also just made an encoder. It
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
Okay let me clarify, I think that if Zend did not exist then php would be in a better position. Why? Because something like php-encoder would of filled the void sooner and everyone would of benefited from encoders and accelerators. So far it really does feel like a bait and switch act since people develop in php thinking it's opensource and then when it's not performing up to par someone waves a flag to say "Hey you could give me several thousand dollars and I'll make it work" Wow Justin gets a lot of job offers so that means there are a ton of jobs for php developers. I feel better now. And thanks for reading my mind, there's like 3 of you on this list. Do you do partys? -Original Message- From: Justin French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: August 4, 2002 3:09 AM To: Acer; php Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding on 04/08/02 3:55 PM, Acer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > so fine zend is ripping people off, what's the point? well it has been > damaging to php is my point. no one knows what php is and no one will pay > you to do php. why blame zend on this? no matter what rasmus says that 600 > people have access to the cvs, php is zend and zend is php. I don't believe Zend's charging for commerical extensions to the product has harmed it in any way. I also don't believe that Zend is ripping people off. You have no way of telling if any competitive product does as good a job, and furthermore, since the *one product you found* is in beta, then the argument is totally shallow. Zend is a commercial company, and has the right to charge what *they* perceive as market value for a product. You have the choice not to buy it, and you have the choice not to use PHP at all. There is no way you can blame Zend products for the fact you can't get a PHP job. I really laughed at this. The primary scripting languages asked for by job ads in my area are primarily ASP and Java. So what? Java is a well-established language, which has been around for ages. ASP (and other microsoft technologies) are backed by the biggest software company in the world. PHP has made a massive indentation into the server-side scripting world in just a few years, and I get emailed about jobs and contracts ALL THE TIME that want me to use it. Furthermore, perhaps the reason why you can't get anyone to pay you is (no insult intended): - your poor communication skills - your lack of any real programming experience - your lack of experience in the right projects / skills - you're not looking in the right places - you're only looking at advertised work, not creating a job None of this is Zend's fault, and switching to ASP, or having Zend give away the encoder will not fix any of this. You make me laugh. I'm getting plenty of work. Justin French -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
First I don't know who Nick is, never meet him and just stumbled onto his
project. He created phpa (http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk) and is used by
yahoo. He has built the encoder (http://www.php-encoder.com) from his
experience in phpa so it being in beta or not is up to you to evaluate.
Now a correction. The minimum is $0.50 to encode. Obviously it wouldn't
make sense to encode per file since you could just put all your scripts in
one file so the encoding is based on the complete source size. As an
example (this is on his site), all of squirrelmail would of cost $25 to
encode and then you could sell as many times you want.
Now why would you encode? Rasmus thinks it's evil but I'm sure some of us
have been stiffed on projects. So it's a good protection since it allows
you to put into your program a check that the domain name is registered for
use by you. Something like:
if (domain_name is in my database_registration)
{
let them use the admin page
}
else
{
they get locked out
}
You can obviously add that into your programs now but by encoding your
program then no one can hunt it down in your source and erase it since it's
encoded. This is why I don't think encoders are evil (be it zend or
php-encoder) and just because you encode your project doesn't mean people
won't share their knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 4, 2002 5:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
On Sunday 04 August 2002 15:53, David Freeman wrote:
> > Now that Nick has released the free
> > accelerator and an inexpensive ($0.50 per shot) encoder it
> > might change but I don't know if it's too late.
>
> Great for Nick (whoever he is). $0.50 isn't necessarily cheap though.
> I have one of my own web sites with about 50 php pages on it. That
> would be $250 to encode just one website. Ten similar web sites and
> you're talking $2500. That's getting up towards what Zend charges isn't
> it?
$0.50 x 50 = $25.00
--
Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.com.hk
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web Design & Hosting * Internet & Intranet Applications Development *
/*
To err is human; to forgive is simply not our policy.
-- MIT Assasination Club
*/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP/MySQL Error Log Parser
How can I set up MySQL error logging? Is there any PHP MySQL error log parsers? Thank You -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] alternative to phpadsnew?
O.A.S.I.S the fastest of all. Look for it omn sourceforge.net With OASIS you can deliver up to 500,000 views per hour. PHP/Mysql based. Regards, Andrey > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 4:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [PHP] alternative to phpadsnew? > > > > Hi there, > > > > I am searching for a way to track advertisment, clickrates on my site. > > So I > > tryed out phpadsnew http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpadsnew/ > > > > Unfortunatelly the current beta 7 works only with register globals set > > to > > on. I cant install it in this case, because my application requires this > > to > > be off. > > > > Has anybody a good recomendation on another software to track adds? > > > > Thank you for any hint on that. > > > > andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Session problem with https
I've followed the threads on sessions, and discovered, to my horror, that I was passing the session id through cookies. Attempting to repair this 'problem' has been fun (with 200+ files). Somehow, the session variables are not passing through once they encounter an https page. I'm using the following for passing the session id: These work for ordinary http, but for https, it gives array(). Each page starts with . I have set globals=off, session.use_trans_sid=1 (so I shouldn't need to use above, but I don't know what to use instead??), and session.use_cookies=0 in my php.ini. In only one https page, when it loads gives me PHPSESSIONID anen3n1nn..., but still does not let me access the variables that should be within that session. I'm totally at a loss what is happening here. Can anyone shed some light on how to retrieve the session variables for an https page? Any help or where to look (beyond the php.net pages where I learned about sessions), would be greatly appreciated. Tia, Andre -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Acer wrote: > Acknowledging the problem is the first step in recovery. *plonk* -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
'Just wanted to make a few comments... I got my job because of PHP. All of my company's projects were coded in PHP. (Old ones that were not are soon to be converted.) Zend? I convinced my boss to buy the encoder--I didn't have to pay for it... Thanks! Thanks to Zend! Thanks to the PHP community! Thanks to those who made the manual! Thanks to the (over) 600 as well! Thanks to the mailing lists, etc! - E - $B85$N%a%C%;!<%8(B - $BAw?.(B : RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding I know I shouldn't do more to keep this going but I'll make this one, and only, post. > this all started when rasmus had a problem with the "click" > in my original post >From what I read, Rasmus made a correction to your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion, but perhaps you should learn that just because it _is_ your opinion it is neither automatically right nor going to be accepted by anyone else. > and i think i proved that if you are a member of the > php development you better not stray from what the php gods think or else > you will get hanged in public or even banned or ignored. I'm guessing that this is in reference to how you think you've been treated. As far as I can see, you've not been hanged in public, you've not been banned and, unfortunately, you've not been ignored either. I'd also suggest that there's a difference between having a differing opinion and trying to shove it down everyone elses throat. > then i suggested that zend isn't really doing much to > "develop" an encoder or accelerator since one guy has been able to do the same > thing Ummm, I really don't see your point here. Zend is doing what Zend chooses to do. Last I checked it's, largely, a free world and Zend is a commercial entity. They have written their particular tools and, by virtue of the fact that they wrote them they can decide how they want to market them. That they've decided to give part of it away for free (Zend engine in PHP) is their choice. I, for one, am glad they did. That they decided to retain control over another part of it (IDE, Optimiser etc) and sell that is also their choice. The price they set for it is also their choice since they created it in the first place. It is not my place, nor yours for that matter, to criticise Zend for what they may or may not do in the commercial market place. Why _should_ Zend do anything in particular to "develop" a php market? So you can get a job programming in PHP? Why is that their problem? > and rasmus is like of course not silly if microsoft sold their products > for what they cost it would be $0.02. I'm not even sure what your point is here... > so fine zend is ripping people off, what's the point? Are they? Were you forced to buy something from Zend? Was I? It's your free choice to spend money with Zend. If you don't then they haven't ripped you off. If you do, one presumes that you have because you see value in doing so. If _NOBODY_ purchases product from Zend then they are free to go broke or review their pricing - that's a commercial reality. > it has been damaging to php is my point. Really? Why is Zend to blame for this 'damage' to PHP? Because they aren't spending money advertising it? How do you know they aren't? I'd expect that Zend, like every other commercial entity, has an advertising budget. I'd expect that they spend money advertising themselves and their products. Are they also expected to spend money promoting php itself? Why? > no one knows what php is and no one will pay you to do php. Really? I've been paid to do php for clients. You point, I believe, was about number of job listings. I've honestly not looked - and I'm not in your part of the world anyway. Consider that a lack of job listings does not necessarily equate to a lack of paid work. Consider that a good many people earn money programming in PHP. Or are you bitter because you feel that you've wasted time learning to program in PHP and now can't get a job? If so, I can only suggest that you get more skills - the more multi-skilled you are the better your chances of employment. Either that or you could apply for jobs that want, for example, ASP and then sell them on the idea of doing the stuff in php instead. Isn't it your 'duty' to do this? If you don't aren't you just 'damaging' php? > no matter what rasmus says that 600 people have access to the > cvs, php is zend and zend is php. I neither claim to be an expert on php nor zend but it was my understanding that zend has contributed a reasonably significant key component of PHP. Even so, they are not the only source of php development. Many people contribute. Each of those people have some say in what happens. > after that is when all the little minions started acting > tough so that the cool kids would like them better. Ummm, ok, whatever... > here's the original post that i made, maybe people should reread it: > --- > There is a free php accelerator so I don't know why y
Re: [PHP] Decode email
the imap function will do this. http://za2.php.net/manual/en/ref.imap.php Paul Roberts http://www.paul-roberts.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 1:06 AM Subject: [PHP] Decode email > Hi > > Anyone know a good email decoder (function or class) that can split the > any email to subject, from, to , body and attachments ? > > > Thank You > >___ > http://www.SaudiABM.com > ___ > About Islam : > http://home2.swipnet.se/~w-20479/Audio.htm > http://sultan.org > ___ > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] mysql_connect
This is probably a mysql permissions issue not a php issue. If you have admin rights on that database GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON DATABASE_NAME.* TO USER_TO_ALLOW_CONNECTIONS_BY@HOST_TO_ALLOW_CONNECTIONS_FROM; (Where DATABASE_NAME is the mysql database to allow connections to, as in "use database in mysql") followed by FLUSH PRIVILEDGES; in mysql as root. Feel free to contact me offlist in the next few hours if you need help determining if this is indeed the issue. be well, ...paul > -Original Message- > From: Mantas Kriauciunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 5:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PHP] mysql_connect > > > Hey php-general, > > $db_host = "localhost"; > > how do i set with ip ? > > it works with localhost > > but it doesn't work: > > $db_host = "IP.IP.IP.IP"; > > or > > $db_host = "Http://IP.IP.IP.IP/";; > > P.S IP i set numbers > > P.S.S i need to connet to mysql on other server > > thanks, sorry for dumb questionjust can't find answer > > -- > Best regards, > Mantas > > Contacts: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] mysql_connect
Hey php-general, $db_host = "localhost"; how do i set with ip ? it works with localhost but it doesn't work: $db_host = "IP.IP.IP.IP"; or $db_host = "Http://IP.IP.IP.IP/";; P.S IP i set numbers P.S.S i need to connet to mysql on other server thanks, sorry for dumb questionjust can't find answer -- Best regards, Mantas Contacts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
On Sunday 04 August 2002 15:53, David Freeman wrote: > > Now that Nick has released the free > > accelerator and an inexpensive ($0.50 per shot) encoder it > > might change but I don't know if it's too late. > > Great for Nick (whoever he is). $0.50 isn't necessarily cheap though. > I have one of my own web sites with about 50 php pages on it. That > would be $250 to encode just one website. Ten similar web sites and > you're talking $2500. That's getting up towards what Zend charges isn't > it? $0.50 x 50 = $25.00 -- Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.com.hk Open Source Software Systems Integrators * Web Design & Hosting * Internet & Intranet Applications Development * /* To err is human; to forgive is simply not our policy. -- MIT Assasination Club */ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: Protect PHP coding
I know I shouldn't do more to keep this going but I'll make this one, and only, post. > this all started when rasmus had a problem with the "click" > in my original post >From what I read, Rasmus made a correction to your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion, but perhaps you should learn that just because it _is_ your opinion it is neither automatically right nor going to be accepted by anyone else. > and i think i proved that if you are a member of the > php development you better not stray from what the php gods think or else > you will get hanged in public or even banned or ignored. I'm guessing that this is in reference to how you think you've been treated. As far as I can see, you've not been hanged in public, you've not been banned and, unfortunately, you've not been ignored either. I'd also suggest that there's a difference between having a differing opinion and trying to shove it down everyone elses throat. > then i suggested that zend isn't really doing much to > "develop" an encoder or accelerator since one guy has been able to do the same > thing Ummm, I really don't see your point here. Zend is doing what Zend chooses to do. Last I checked it's, largely, a free world and Zend is a commercial entity. They have written their particular tools and, by virtue of the fact that they wrote them they can decide how they want to market them. That they've decided to give part of it away for free (Zend engine in PHP) is their choice. I, for one, am glad they did. That they decided to retain control over another part of it (IDE, Optimiser etc) and sell that is also their choice. The price they set for it is also their choice since they created it in the first place. It is not my place, nor yours for that matter, to criticise Zend for what they may or may not do in the commercial market place. Why _should_ Zend do anything in particular to "develop" a php market? So you can get a job programming in PHP? Why is that their problem? > and rasmus is like of course not silly if microsoft sold their products > for what they cost it would be $0.02. I'm not even sure what your point is here... > so fine zend is ripping people off, what's the point? Are they? Were you forced to buy something from Zend? Was I? It's your free choice to spend money with Zend. If you don't then they haven't ripped you off. If you do, one presumes that you have because you see value in doing so. If _NOBODY_ purchases product from Zend then they are free to go broke or review their pricing - that's a commercial reality. > it has been damaging to php is my point. Really? Why is Zend to blame for this 'damage' to PHP? Because they aren't spending money advertising it? How do you know they aren't? I'd expect that Zend, like every other commercial entity, has an advertising budget. I'd expect that they spend money advertising themselves and their products. Are they also expected to spend money promoting php itself? Why? > no one knows what php is and no one will pay you to do php. Really? I've been paid to do php for clients. You point, I believe, was about number of job listings. I've honestly not looked - and I'm not in your part of the world anyway. Consider that a lack of job listings does not necessarily equate to a lack of paid work. Consider that a good many people earn money programming in PHP. Or are you bitter because you feel that you've wasted time learning to program in PHP and now can't get a job? If so, I can only suggest that you get more skills - the more multi-skilled you are the better your chances of employment. Either that or you could apply for jobs that want, for example, ASP and then sell them on the idea of doing the stuff in php instead. Isn't it your 'duty' to do this? If you don't aren't you just 'damaging' php? > no matter what rasmus says that 600 people have access to the > cvs, php is zend and zend is php. I neither claim to be an expert on php nor zend but it was my understanding that zend has contributed a reasonably significant key component of PHP. Even so, they are not the only source of php development. Many people contribute. Each of those people have some say in what happens. > after that is when all the little minions started acting > tough so that the cool kids would like them better. Ummm, ok, whatever... > here's the original post that i made, maybe people should reread it: > --- > There is a free php accelerator so I don't know why you > would pay for one. > www.php-accelerator.co.uk OK, so don't pay for one. I don't see anyone forcing you to pay for one. It's your choice. > The same guy (Nick) has also just made an encoder. It is in > beta testing > right now and there's no windows version yet but that should > be coming soon. > I think it's like $0.50 to encode your program which is much more > affordable. > http://www.php-encoder.com OK, that's cool. Good for Nick. > I think the p
Re: [PHP] which function can do so ?
Have a look at the predefined variables in PHP... particularly the $_SERVER array. http://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.php#reserved.variables.serve r I think you'll want $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'], but it will depend on your PHP version, server environment, etc etc. Justin French on 04/08/02 5:11 PM, Ryan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I am exactly a beginner of php. This question may be easy. > I have a php program which want to achieve the url from browser. > e.g. webmail.xxx.com > > then how the index.php is able to know it is xxx.com ?? > which function in php can do so?? > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] which function can do so ?
I read his question as wanting to know how to figure out the URL of his
site, use the varible $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] or $HTTP_HOST on old PHP
versions, that will return the full domain, from the www. to the .com so you
may want to do some spliting of that varible to figure out what just the bit
in the middle is... If you need help doing that just post again :)
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: "php @ banana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP-GENERAL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 04, 2002 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] which function can do so ?
> you mean redirect?
>
> header("Location: www.stuff.com");
>
> make sure it goes before any output to screen or html tags or it won't
> work,
>
>
> >I am exactly a beginner of php. This question may be easy.
> >I have a php program which want to achieve the url from browser.
> >e.g. webmail.xxx.com
> >
> >then how the index.php is able to know it is xxx.com ??
> >which function in php can do so??
> >
> >
> >--
> >PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> >To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
>
>
> --__-__-__
> eat pasta
> type fasta
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
