date:20160918


Nixon's quote is in the opening post:

Nixon's comment was hilarious; he'd be hung for it today: "The Bohemian 
Grove -- which I attend, from time to time -- it is the most faggy 
goddamned thing you could ever imagine, with that San Francisco crowd. I 
can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."



On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 8:46:47 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Hah!  
>
> Richard Nixon attended the gathering one year, and came back telling 
> Haldeman and others, (and I forget the exact quote, but) something to the 
> effect of, "I believe that some of the guys were feeling a bit frisky"! 
>  (referring to homosexual activities!)
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:15 PM, geoffrey theist  > wrote:
>
>> Funny you should bring it up I've heard it's a place where the 
>> bushes,Clinton and other luminaries of the illuminati revert back to their 
>> reptilian shapes and dine on human babies and sacrifice virgins to 
>> baal.
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2016 7:09 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
>> politic...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd never heard of this before. Apparently a secret society of the 
>>> Washington elite and business elite. It's described as a secret getaway 
>>> that happens annually in Northern California for 2.5 weeks in July.
>>>
>>> I came across it in reading Colin Powell's emails (he attends) from 2014.
>>>
>>> When I googled it I found this video; the impromptu interview of Alex 
>>> Jones with David Gergen is fascinating: 
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsbKIiU7OP0
>>>
>>> The ABC story that followed it from 1981 is also interesting: 
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=recDlFPNU6M
>>>
>>> Nixon's comment was hilarious; he'd be hung for it today: "The Bohemian 
>>> Grove -- which I attend, from time to time -- it is the most faggy 
>>> goddamned thing you could ever imagine, with that San Francisco crowd. I 
>>> can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>  
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Bohemian Grove


Seriously that is a lot of globalist power brokers that gather there.
---
Sure is. I was reading Colin Powell's emails yesterday. In them, he makes 
sure his friends know he's either going or just got back from there each 
year. On the one this year, he sent an email to a friend upon return 
saying, "half the nation's GDP was there".

Politicians, bankers, hedge fund managersit completely reveals the 
governing elite that has taken this country down.

I used to admire Colin Powell, even if I don't agree with his politics. But 
then I read almost 2 years' worth of his emails. :(


On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 8:52:41 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote:
>
> Seriously that is a lot of globalist power brokers that gather there.
>
> On Sep 17, 2016 7:46 PM, "Keith In Tampa"  > wrote:
>
>> Hah!  
>>
>> Richard Nixon attended the gathering one year, and came back telling 
>> Haldeman and others, (and I forget the exact quote, but) something to the 
>> effect of, "I believe that some of the guys were feeling a bit frisky"! 
>>  (referring to homosexual activities!)
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:15 PM, geoffrey theist > > wrote:
>>
>>> Funny you should bring it up I've heard it's a place where the 
>>> bushes,Clinton and other luminaries of the illuminati revert back to their 
>>> reptilian shapes and dine on human babies and sacrifice virgins to 
>>> baal.
>>>
>>> On Sep 17, 2016 7:09 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
>>> politic...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>>>

 I'd never heard of this before. Apparently a secret society of the 
 Washington elite and business elite. It's described as a secret getaway 
 that happens annually in Northern California for 2.5 weeks in July.

 I came across it in reading Colin Powell's emails (he attends) from 
 2014.

 When I googled it I found this video; the impromptu interview of Alex 
 Jones with David Gergen is fascinating: 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsbKIiU7OP0

 The ABC story that followed it from 1981 is also interesting: 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=recDlFPNU6M

 Nixon's comment was hilarious; he'd be hung for it today: "The 
 Bohemian Grove -- which I attend, from time to time -- it is the most 
 faggy 
 goddamned thing you could ever imagine, with that San Francisco crowd. I 
 can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."

 -- 
 -- 
 Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
 For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
  
 * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
 * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
 * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>  
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more

Re: [New post] Police humor!

Hah!  Do you read what you post?

*"Few American football players have come out as gay. Six former National
Football League (NFL) players have come out publicly after they retired. *(Out
of hundreds of thousands!)* There has never been anyone who has been
publicly out while playing in the NFL.[1]

Michael
Sam was selected by the St. Louis Rams in 2014 NFL Draft, and became the
first publicly gay player drafted in the league, but was released before
the start of the regular season. He became the first publicly gay player to
play in the Canadian Football League in August 2015." *And never played a
game in a regular season CFL game!



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:10 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

> Homosexuality is still not all that prominent in the NFL, despite what
> ESPN and other far left Establishment media hypes may attempt to portray.
> ---
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_American_football
>
> But no matter, the Titans had a good day!  Enjoy it.
> ---
> I couldn't care less about football.
> it's a game that some adults take way too serious.
>
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:49:45 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Uhm.Last time I checked, Michael Sam was sweeping floors at Wal-Mart;
>> the Bucs never had Sam on their roster, (nor was Sam ever invited to try
>> out for the Buccaneers) and no.Homosexuality is still not all that
>> prominent in the NFL, despite what ESPN and other far left Establishment
>> media hypes may attempt to portray.
>>
>> But no matter, the Titans had a good day!  Enjoy it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:46 PM, plainolamerican 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Some players and coaches in the Buccaneers' building hold anti-gay
>>> convictions, as is the case in any other workplace with several hundred
>>> employees. Similarly, some players, coaches or other employees are gay,
>>> openly or not. Michael Sam won't be the first gay player in the NFL: he'll
>>> simply be the first openly gay player. None of this will matter for Sam or
>>> any other gay player if team leadership handles this issue responsibly --
>>> like any other workplace would (or at least, should).
>>>
>>> Whether or not Sam is drafted by the Buccaneers, they'll have to figure
>>> out how they'll handle an openly gay player in the NFL. Michael Sam won't
>>> be the last player to come out, and he probably wouldn't be the first gay
>>> player in the Bucs' locker room, either. At some point, they'll be
>>> confronted with an openly gay player-- and they need to know how they want
>>> to handle that.
>>>
>>> While we probably won't see any negative comments on Sam from any
>>> Buccaneer (not with their name attached, anyway), we can say that at least
>>> one Buccaneer supports Michael Sam.
>>>
>>> *More from Bucs Nation*
>>>
>>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:27:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:

 S0me of those are actually funny!

 (As a side note, your Homosexual team, the pride of the Gay Agenda;
  the Tennessee Titans, did well today Plain Ol"!)



 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, plainolamerican 
 wrote:

> [image: Image result for police don make me shoot you in the back]
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:15:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DCG posted: " DCG"
>> Respond to this post by replying above this line
>>
>> New post on *Fellowship of the Minds*
>>  Police humor!
>>  by DCG
>> 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> DCG
>> *DCG * | September
>> 18, 2016 at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals
>> , Humor
>>  | URL:
>> http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN
>>
>> Comment
>> 
>>See all comments
>> 
>>
>> Unsubscribe
>> 
>> to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
>> Change your email settings at Manage

Re: [New post] Police humor!

Homosexuality is still not all that prominent in the NFL, despite what ESPN 
and other far left Establishment media hypes may attempt to portray. 
---
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_American_football

But no matter, the Titans had a good day!  Enjoy it.
---
I couldn't care less about football.
it's a game that some adults take way too serious.


On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:49:45 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Uhm.Last time I checked, Michael Sam was sweeping floors at Wal-Mart; 
> the Bucs never had Sam on their roster, (nor was Sam ever invited to try 
> out for the Buccaneers) and no.Homosexuality is still not all that 
> prominent in the NFL, despite what ESPN and other far left Establishment 
> media hypes may attempt to portray. 
>
> But no matter, the Titans had a good day!  Enjoy it.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:46 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>> Some players and coaches in the Buccaneers' building hold anti-gay 
>> convictions, as is the case in any other workplace with several hundred 
>> employees. Similarly, some players, coaches or other employees are gay, 
>> openly or not. Michael Sam won't be the first gay player in the NFL: he'll 
>> simply be the first openly gay player. None of this will matter for Sam or 
>> any other gay player if team leadership handles this issue responsibly -- 
>> like any other workplace would (or at least, should).
>>
>> Whether or not Sam is drafted by the Buccaneers, they'll have to figure 
>> out how they'll handle an openly gay player in the NFL. Michael Sam won't 
>> be the last player to come out, and he probably wouldn't be the first gay 
>> player in the Bucs' locker room, either. At some point, they'll be 
>> confronted with an openly gay player-- and they need to know how they want 
>> to handle that.
>>
>> While we probably won't see any negative comments on Sam from any 
>> Buccaneer (not with their name attached, anyway), we can say that at least 
>> one Buccaneer supports Michael Sam.
>>
>> *More from Bucs Nation*
>>
>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:27:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> S0me of those are actually funny!
>>>
>>> (As a side note, your Homosexual team, the pride of the Gay Agenda;  the 
>>> Tennessee Titans, did well today Plain Ol"!)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, plainolamerican  
>>> wrote:
>>>
 [image: Image result for police don make me shoot you in the back]

 On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:15:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DCG posted: " DCG" 
> Respond to this post by replying above this line 
>
> New post on *Fellowship of the Minds* 
>  Police humor! 
>  by DCG 
>  
>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> DCG
> *DCG * | September 
> 18, 2016 at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals 
> , Humor 
>  | URL: 
> http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN 
>
> Comment 
> See 
> all comments 
>  
>
> Unsubscribe 
> 
>  
> to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions 
> .
>  
>
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
> http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/09/18/police-humor/ 
>
> Thanks for flying with WordPress.com  
>
>
>
> -- 
 -- 
 Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
 For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
  
 * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
 * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
 * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
 To unsubscribe from this

Re: Religious Squirrels

the Jewish Synagogue, but it's rumored that they took one squirrel and 
circumcised him
---

[image: Image result for jewish circumcision rabbi suck blood]
[image: Image result for jewish circumcision rabbi suck blood]
[image: Image result for jewish circumcision rabbi suck blood]
On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 2:59:10 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Religious Squirrels
>
>  
>
> The Presbyterian Church called a meeting to decide what to do about their 
> squirrels.  After much prayer and consideration, they determined the 
> squirrels were predestined to be there and they shouldn't interfere with 
> God's divine will.
>
>  
>
> At the Baptist Church the squirrels had taken an interest in the 
> baptistery.  The Deacons met and decided to put a water slide on the 
> baptistery and let the squirrels drown themselves.  The squirrels liked the 
> slide and unfortunately, knew instinctively how to swim so twice as many 
> squirrels showed up the following week.
>
>  
>
> The Episcopal Church decided that they were not in a position to harm any 
> of God's creatures.  So, they humanely trapped their squirrels and set them 
> free near the Baptist Church.  Two weeks later the squirrels were back when 
> the Baptists took down the water slide.
>
>  
>
> But the Catholic Church came up with a very creative strategy.  They 
> baptized all the squirrels and consecrated them as members of  the church.  
> Now they only see them on Christmas and Easter.
>
>  
>
> Not much was heard from the Jewish Synagogue, but it's rumored that they 
> took one squirrel and circumcised him, and they haven't seen a squirrel on 
> their property since.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
> --
> [image: Avast logo]  
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> www.avast.com  
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
> --
> 
> --
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Bohemian Grove

I'd never heard of this before. Apparently a secret society of the 
Washington elite and business elite.
---
I have a few friends who are members.
It's a consortium of great thinkers regardless of their politics, beliefs 
or associations.

fwiw ... women have to vacate the premises at 9pm.

On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 7:09:23 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote:
>
>
> I'd never heard of this before. Apparently a secret society of the 
> Washington elite and business elite. It's described as a secret getaway 
> that happens annually in Northern California for 2.5 weeks in July.
>
> I came across it in reading Colin Powell's emails (he attends) from 2014.
>
> When I googled it I found this video; the impromptu interview of Alex 
> Jones with David Gergen is fascinating: 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsbKIiU7OP0
>
> The ABC story that followed it from 1981 is also interesting: 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=recDlFPNU6M
>
> Nixon's comment was hilarious; he'd be hung for it today: "The Bohemian 
> Grove -- which I attend, from time to time -- it is the most faggy 
> goddamned thing you could ever imagine, with that San Francisco crowd. I 
> can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [New post] Police humor!

Uhm.Last time I checked, Michael Sam was sweeping floors at Wal-Mart;
the Bucs never had Sam on their roster, (nor was Sam ever invited to try
out for the Buccaneers) and no.Homosexuality is still not all that
prominent in the NFL, despite what ESPN and other far left Establishment
media hypes may attempt to portray.

But no matter, the Titans had a good day!  Enjoy it.



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:46 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

> Some players and coaches in the Buccaneers' building hold anti-gay
> convictions, as is the case in any other workplace with several hundred
> employees. Similarly, some players, coaches or other employees are gay,
> openly or not. Michael Sam won't be the first gay player in the NFL: he'll
> simply be the first openly gay player. None of this will matter for Sam or
> any other gay player if team leadership handles this issue responsibly --
> like any other workplace would (or at least, should).
>
> Whether or not Sam is drafted by the Buccaneers, they'll have to figure
> out how they'll handle an openly gay player in the NFL. Michael Sam won't
> be the last player to come out, and he probably wouldn't be the first gay
> player in the Bucs' locker room, either. At some point, they'll be
> confronted with an openly gay player-- and they need to know how they want
> to handle that.
>
> While we probably won't see any negative comments on Sam from any
> Buccaneer (not with their name attached, anyway), we can say that at least
> one Buccaneer supports Michael Sam.
>
> *More from Bucs Nation*
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:27:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> S0me of those are actually funny!
>>
>> (As a side note, your Homosexual team, the pride of the Gay Agenda;  the
>> Tennessee Titans, did well today Plain Ol"!)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, plainolamerican 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [image: Image result for police don make me shoot you in the back]
>>>
>>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:15:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:






 DCG posted: " DCG"
 Respond to this post by replying above this line

 New post on *Fellowship of the Minds*
  Police humor!
  by DCG
 

 
 
 
 
 
 DCG
 *DCG * | September 18,
 2016 at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals
 , Humor
  | URL:
 http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN

 Comment
 See
 all comments
 

 Unsubscribe
 
 to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
 Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
 .


 *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
 http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/09/18/police-humor/

 Thanks for flying with WordPress.com 



 --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from

Re: 5 days and counting

I take it, it's hunting season in Tennessee?
---
in 5 days it'll be harvest time.
I'm hoping for 3 turkeys and 4 deer this season.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:22:25 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Going Home Plain Ol'?
>
> ( I take it, it's hunting season in Tennessee?)
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:14 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>> [image: Image result for TWRA wild turkey pictures]
>> [image: Image result for great deer pictures]
>>
>> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
>> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
>> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
>> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [New post] Police humor!

Some players and coaches in the Buccaneers' building hold anti-gay 
convictions, as is the case in any other workplace with several hundred 
employees. Similarly, some players, coaches or other employees are gay, 
openly or not. Michael Sam won't be the first gay player in the NFL: he'll 
simply be the first openly gay player. None of this will matter for Sam or 
any other gay player if team leadership handles this issue responsibly -- 
like any other workplace would (or at least, should).

Whether or not Sam is drafted by the Buccaneers, they'll have to figure out 
how they'll handle an openly gay player in the NFL. Michael Sam won't be 
the last player to come out, and he probably wouldn't be the first gay 
player in the Bucs' locker room, either. At some point, they'll be 
confronted with an openly gay player-- and they need to know how they want 
to handle that.

While we probably won't see any negative comments on Sam from any Buccaneer 
(not with their name attached, anyway), we can say that at least one 
Buccaneer supports Michael Sam.

*More from Bucs Nation*

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:27:39 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> S0me of those are actually funny!
>
> (As a side note, your Homosexual team, the pride of the Gay Agenda;  the 
> Tennessee Titans, did well today Plain Ol"!)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>> [image: Image result for police don make me shoot you in the back]
>>
>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:15:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> DCG posted: " DCG" 
>>> Respond to this post by replying above this line 
>>>
>>> New post on *Fellowship of the Minds* 
>>>  Police humor! 
>>>  by DCG 
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> DCG
>>> *DCG * | September 18, 
>>> 2016 at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals 
>>> , Humor 
>>>  | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN 
>>>
>>> Comment 
>>> See 
>>> all comments 
>>>  
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
>>> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions 
>>> .
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
>>> http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/09/18/police-humor/ 
>>>
>>> Thanks for flying with WordPress.com  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

I guess you're admitting that Christians and Jews aren't as insanely 
bigoted at Muslims.
---
they're just as insane as muzzies.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:31:05 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote:
>
>
> I guess you're admitting that Christians and Jews aren't as insanely 
> bigoted at Muslims.
>
> Baby steps, Plainol. good job. :)
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:08:37 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote:
>>
>> refugees being dumped in cities all over America
>> ---
>> Christian and Jewish charities sign up for self-destruction 
>> By Carol Brown 
>>
>> Read more: 
>> http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/christian_and_jewish_charities_sign_up_for_selfdestruction.html#ixzz4KeTQaYbY
>>  
>> Christian and Jewish charities are at the epicenter of “refugee 
>> resettlement.” There’s a lot of money to be made providing services to 
>> colonizers (aka “refugees”). And infidels are tripping over themselves to 
>> sign on for what will ultimately be their own demise.
>>
>> Go figure.
>>
>> There are nine non-profit organizations (most of them religious 
>> charities) that are authorized by the State Department and the Department 
>> of Homeland Security to play a central role in all things refugee, 
>> particularly in “preferred communities 
>> .”
>>  
>> These non-profits (and their affiliates 
>> ) have a monopoly on 
>> access to government grants for refugee-related programs and services – 
>> grants funded by the American taxpayer.
>>
>> Refugee Resettlement Watch (RRW) reports 
>> 
>>  
>> the grants are above and beyond “what the contractors already get on a per 
>> head basis for the refugees they resettle.” And as one might expect, there 
>> is no accountability as to how the money is used.
>>
>> Noted below is an overview of the nine non-profits along with their 
>> mission statements and related links. You’ll notice their visions are 
>> variations on a theme. No doubt many of these organizations do some good 
>> work. But on the matter of Muslim colonizers and economic migrants, they 
>> are completely behind the curve. In fact most, if not all of these 
>> organizations are pressing for the United States to accept more “refugees” 
>> from the Islamic world. Once here, they have a range of resources to help 
>> them access all manner of benefits and services. Many of these 
>> organization’s web sites feature pictures of Muslim women in hijabs and/or 
>> pictures of Muslim children that would, they hope, melt your heart. The 
>> fact that one day some of them would cut your head off seems lost on the 
>> people who run these charities.
>>
>>
>> HIAS, Inc. (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)/Refugee and Immigrant Services 
>>  “works around the world to protect refugees who 
>> have been forced to flee their homelands because of who they are, including 
>> ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. For more than 130 years, HIAS has 
>> been helping refugees rebuild their lives in safety and dignity.” Link to 
>> contact page, here .
>>
>>
>> Church World Service/Immigration and Refugee Program  
>> offers migrants “freedom, hope, and opportunity,” welcoming them when they 
>> arrive, facilitating access to community services, linking them with job 
>> opportunities, assisting with applications for permanent residency, family 
>> reunification, and naturalization, and providing English classes. Link to 
>> contact page, here . Link to businesses 
>> that support them, here .
>>
>>
>> Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church 
>> 
>>  advocates 
>> “for solutions to a variety of pressing issues, including domestic poverty, 
>> environmental protection and global justice. Some of its work revolves 
>> around improving access to healthy food in poor and minority communities -- 
>> the same communities that are often most negatively impacted by ecological 
>> degradation.” Link to contact page, here 
>> .
>>
>>
>> Ethiopian Community Development Council, Inc./Refugee Resettlement Program 
>>  has resettled more 25,000 refugees. 
>> They “work with each refugee for an initial 30-day period that can be 
>> extended up to 90 days after arrival.” They provide a range of services, 
>> including welcoming refugees at the airport, providing housing, furniture, 
>> food, and clothing. They also help them enroll in school, find jobs, and 
>>

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

We've established who promotes it, (and yesWho capitlizes upon it)
--
yep ... jews and xians.

  but you Sir, are a part and parcel of the proble, and yet you have the 
audacity to point fingers at those who for maybe the right or wrong 
reasons, attempt to help.
---
fuck the xians and jews and their help. 

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:21:16 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> No.We've established who promotes it, (and yesWho capitlizes upon 
> it)  but you Sir, are a part and parcel of the proble, and yet you have the 
> audacity to point fingers at those who for maybe the right or wrong 
> reasons, attempt to help. 
>
> Typical.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>> it's his crew who promote and aggrandize the whole "Open Borders/We 
>> Welcome The Illegal Aliens With Open Arms" Stchick! 
>> ---
>> wrong ... that would be profit motivated jews and xians who suck money 
>> from our tax dollars in name of a mythical jewish god.
>>
>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 6:22:07 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Hah!
>>>
>>> Our resident Moonbat is back, atwitter with his usual "Deflect" patterns 
>>> and refusing to admit that it's his crew who promote and aggrandize the 
>>> whole "Open Borders/We Welcome The Illegal Aliens With Open Arms" Stchick! 
>>>
>>> "*Everything Changes~~Nothing Changes*!"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:08 PM, plainolamerican  
>>> wrote:
>>>
 refugees being dumped in cities all over America
 ---
 Christian and Jewish charities sign up for self-destruction 
 By Carol Brown 

 Read more: 
 http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/christian_and_jewish_charities_sign_up_for_selfdestruction.html#ixzz4KeTQaYbY

 Christian and Jewish charities are at the epicenter of “refugee 
 resettlement.” There’s a lot of money to be made providing services to 
 colonizers (aka “refugees”). And infidels are tripping over themselves to 
 sign on for what will ultimately be their own demise.

 Go figure.

 There are nine non-profit organizations (most of them religious 
 charities) that are authorized by the State Department and the Department 
 of Homeland Security to play a central role in all things refugee, 
 particularly in “preferred communities 
 .”

 These non-profits (and their affiliates 
 ) have a monopoly on 
 access to government grants for refugee-related programs and services – 
 grants funded by the American taxpayer.

 Refugee Resettlement Watch (RRW) reports 

 the grants are above and beyond “what the contractors already get on a per 
 head basis for the refugees they resettle.” And as one might expect, there 
 is no accountability as to how the money is used.

 Noted below is an overview of the nine non-profits along with their 
 mission statements and related links. You’ll notice their visions are 
 variations on a theme. No doubt many of these organizations do some good 
 work. But on the matter of Muslim colonizers and economic migrants, they 
 are completely behind the curve. In fact most, if not all of these 
 organizations are pressing for the United States to accept more “refugees” 
 from the Islamic world. Once here, they have a range of resources to help 
 them access all manner of benefits and services. Many of these 
 organization’s web sites feature pictures of Muslim women in hijabs and/or 
 pictures of Muslim children that would, they hope, melt your heart. 
 The fact that one day some of them would cut your head off seems lost 
 on the people who run these charities.

 HIAS, Inc. (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)/Refugee and Immigrant Services 
  “works around the world to protect refugees who 
 have been forced to flee their homelands because of who they are, 
 including 
 ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. For more than 130 years, HIAS 
 has 
 been helping refugees rebuild their lives in safety and dignity.” Link to 
 contact page, here .

 Church World Service/Immigration and Refugee Program 
  offers migrants “freedom, hope, and opportunity,” 
 welcoming them when they arrive, facilitating access to community 
 services, 
 linking them with job opportunities, assisting with applications for 
 permanent residency, family reunification, and naturalization, and

Re: [New post] Trump: Hillary Clinton First Presidential Candidate Proposing to Abolish U.S. Borders



http://therightstuff.biz/2015/08/21/who-opened-the-borders/
Who Opened the Borders? 
*Reactionary Tree*  Aug 
21, 2015 2519 comments 
 

   - 
   
   - 
   
With the smashing success of Ann Coulter's new book *¡Adios, America! 
* and the 
rise of the Trumpenkrieg, there is a lot for immigration restrictionists to 
celebrate about. However, it may be too little too late. White babies born 
today are already a minority 
.
 
Also, Whites are projected to be a minority by the year 2045 
.
 
So how did we get here? For those of you high time preference goys who are 
too lazy to invest the time to read the masterpiece that is Kevin 
MacDonald's *Culture of Critique 
*,
 
I will attempt to summarize his findings about the influence of Jewish 
intellectuals and organizations in fighting for a liberalized immigration 
policy.

The first question I am sure that some of you may be asking is, *Why would 
Jews want a multicultural society?* Multiculturalism serves both internal 
and external Jewish interests. Internally, it serves the interests of Jews 
because it allows for Jews to overtly advocate for policies in their 
interests rather than in a cryptic manner (similar to the NAACP and NCLR), 
thus legitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a 
majority's host society. Externally, it benefits Jewish interests because 
they simply become just another group in a sea of various ethnic groups, 
thus making it difficult to unite society in opposition to Jews. 
Historically, Jews have not fared well 
 in ethnically homogeneous 
societies.

Now let us venture into the echoey history of American immigration policy.

One of the very first advocates for multiculturalism was Horace Kallen 
. In 1915, Kallen wrote an 
essay titled Democracy versus The Melting Pot, where he refuted sociologist 
Edward 
A. Ross , a Darwinian, 
who argued that different groups would be in competition for resources (the 
term "melting pot" was actually popularized by one Israel Zangwill 
 in 1908). Kallen advocated 
that different ethnic groups should be allowed to remain genetically and 
culturally cohesive while participating in American democracy. Kallen is 
credited with coining the term "cultural pluralism". It is also noteworthy 
that Kallen went on to be involved in several important Jewish 
organizations: The American Jewish Congress 
 (AJCongress) and 
The Zionist Organization of America 
 (ZOA). 
Kallen's ideas became very popular in Zionist circles, especially with 
Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis 
, who was a 
prominent leader in the American Zionist movement and the ZOA.

So with that background information out of the way, *let the games begin!*

*Immigration Act of 1924 (Johnson-Reed Act)*

In 1921, the Emergency Immigration Act 
 was passed and 
established quotas that used a National Origin Formula 
. This act was 
later revised in 1924 with the Johnson-Reed Act 
. It faced 
considerable opposition from Jewish organizations that advocated to open up 
the borders.

Our good goy buddy Edward A. Ross noted that Jews had a powerful interest 
in immigration policy:

Hence the endeavor of the Jews to control the immigration policy of the 
United States. Although theirs is but a seventh of our net immigration, 
they left the fight on the Immigration Commission's bill. The power of the 
million Jews in the Metropolis lined up the Congressional delegation from 
New York in solid opposition to the literacy test. The systemic campaign in 
newspaper and magazines to break down all arguments for restriction to calm 
nativist fears is waged by and for one race. *Hebrew money is behind the 
National Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications*. From 
the paper before the commercial body or the scientific association to the 
heavy treatise produced with the aid of the Baron de Hirsh Fund, the 
literature that proves the blessings of

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.


Cuomo looked like a complete idiot giving that statement IMO. "It depends 
on your definition of terrorism".

No, actually it doesn't. Nobody has said it's radical Islamic terrorism, 
but you'd have to be an abject moron to try to claim it's not terrorism. Of 
course I guess he had to say that b/c the even dumber mayor of NYC couldn't 
bring himself to even admit that.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:33:31 PM UTC-4, brine wrote:
>
> The NYC and NJ attacks have yet to be confirmed to be Islamic terrorism, 
> Governor Cuomo called the NY attack terrorism, but not sure if it is 
> international ... all attacks on citizens is terrorism ... I remember 
> living in the UK during the "Irish Problem" ... we may have a lot of local 
> assholes doing shit!!!
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
> politic...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>>
>> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a 
>> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman 
>> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag 
>> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>>
>> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week, 
>> but can't recall where it was.
>>
>> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease 
>> in terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of 
>> the above happens within a few days.
>>
>> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected 
>> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and 
>> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow 
>> upon them.
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> brine
> http://brineb.blogspot.com/
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.


I guess you're admitting that Christians and Jews aren't as insanely 
bigoted at Muslims.

Baby steps, Plainol. good job. :)

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 7:08:37 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote:
>
> refugees being dumped in cities all over America
> ---
> Christian and Jewish charities sign up for self-destruction 
> By Carol Brown 
>
> Read more: 
> http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/christian_and_jewish_charities_sign_up_for_selfdestruction.html#ixzz4KeTQaYbY
>  
> Christian and Jewish charities are at the epicenter of “refugee 
> resettlement.” There’s a lot of money to be made providing services to 
> colonizers (aka “refugees”). And infidels are tripping over themselves to 
> sign on for what will ultimately be their own demise.
>
> Go figure.
>
> There are nine non-profit organizations (most of them religious charities) 
> that are authorized by the State Department and the Department of Homeland 
> Security to play a central role in all things refugee, particularly in 
> “preferred 
> communities 
> .”
>  
> These non-profits (and their affiliates 
> ) have a monopoly on 
> access to government grants for refugee-related programs and services – 
> grants funded by the American taxpayer.
>
> Refugee Resettlement Watch (RRW) reports 
> 
>  
> the grants are above and beyond “what the contractors already get on a per 
> head basis for the refugees they resettle.” And as one might expect, there 
> is no accountability as to how the money is used.
>
> Noted below is an overview of the nine non-profits along with their 
> mission statements and related links. You’ll notice their visions are 
> variations on a theme. No doubt many of these organizations do some good 
> work. But on the matter of Muslim colonizers and economic migrants, they 
> are completely behind the curve. In fact most, if not all of these 
> organizations are pressing for the United States to accept more “refugees” 
> from the Islamic world. Once here, they have a range of resources to help 
> them access all manner of benefits and services. Many of these 
> organization’s web sites feature pictures of Muslim women in hijabs and/or 
> pictures of Muslim children that would, they hope, melt your heart. The 
> fact that one day some of them would cut your head off seems lost on the 
> people who run these charities.
>
>
> HIAS, Inc. (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)/Refugee and Immigrant Services 
>  “works around the world to protect refugees who 
> have been forced to flee their homelands because of who they are, including 
> ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. For more than 130 years, HIAS has 
> been helping refugees rebuild their lives in safety and dignity.” Link to 
> contact page, here .
>
>
> Church World Service/Immigration and Refugee Program  
> offers migrants “freedom, hope, and opportunity,” welcoming them when they 
> arrive, facilitating access to community services, linking them with job 
> opportunities, assisting with applications for permanent residency, family 
> reunification, and naturalization, and providing English classes. Link to 
> contact page, here . Link to businesses 
> that support them, here .
>
>
> Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church 
> 
>  advocates 
> “for solutions to a variety of pressing issues, including domestic poverty, 
> environmental protection and global justice. Some of its work revolves 
> around improving access to healthy food in poor and minority communities -- 
> the same communities that are often most negatively impacted by ecological 
> degradation.” Link to contact page, here 
> .
>
>
> Ethiopian Community Development Council, Inc./Refugee Resettlement Program 
>  has resettled more 25,000 refugees. 
> They “work with each refugee for an initial 30-day period that can be 
> extended up to 90 days after arrival.” They provide a range of services, 
> including welcoming refugees at the airport, providing housing, furniture, 
> food, and clothing. They also help them enroll in school, find jobs, and 
> access health care, among other public services. Link to contact page, 
> here . Link to partners (the 
> majority of which are the other non-profits on this list) here 
> .
>
>
> International Rescue

Re: [New post] Police humor!

S0me of those are actually funny!

(As a side note, your Homosexual team, the pride of the Gay Agenda;  the
Tennessee Titans, did well today Plain Ol"!)



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

> [image: Image result for police don make me shoot you in the back]
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:15:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DCG posted: " DCG"
>> Respond to this post by replying above this line
>>
>> New post on *Fellowship of the Minds*
>>  Police humor!
>>  by DCG
>> 
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> DCG
>> *DCG * | September 18,
>> 2016 at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals
>> , Humor
>>  | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN
>>
>> Comment
>> See
>> all comments
>> 
>>
>> Unsubscribe
>> 
>> to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
>> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
>> .
>>
>>
>> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
>> http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/09/18/police-humor/
>>
>> Thanks for flying with WordPress.com 
>>
>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [New post] Police humor!

[image: Image result for police don make me shoot you in the back]

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:15:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DCG posted: " DCG" 
> Respond to this post by replying above this line 
>
> New post on *Fellowship of the Minds* 
>  Police humor! 
>  by DCG 
>  
>
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> DCG
> *DCG * | September 18, 
> 2016 at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals 
> , Humor 
>  | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN 
>
> Comment  
>See all comments 
>  
>
> Unsubscribe 
> 
>  
> to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions 
> .
>  
>
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
> http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/09/18/police-humor/ 
>
> Thanks for flying with WordPress.com  
>
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

Huma is a MuslimSo therefore, what you just posted has absolutely 
nothing to do with what we, the adults are talking about in this thread
---
just pointing out there's a first for everything.
the joke will be on your zionist klan when we have our first muslim 
Secretary of State.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 6:25:11 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Plain Ol'?
>
> Do you think that Huma Abedin; (unlike her idiotic husband Anthony Weiner) 
> is Jewish?   (It wouldn't surprise me!)
>
> FYI: Huma is a MuslimSo therefore, what you just posted has absolutely 
> nothing to do with what we, the adults are talking about in this thread!  
> Again.ReadStudy, try to stay informed!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>>
>>- First Jewish Secretary of State 
>>: Henry 
>>Kissinger  (1973)
>>- First Jewish female mayor of a major American city (San Francisco 
>>): Dianne Feinstein 
>> (1977)
>>- First Jewish female governor: Madeleine M. Kunin 
>> (1985)
>>- First Jewish openly gay member of the U.S. Congress 
>>/U.S. House of 
>>Representatives 
>>: 
>>Barney Frank  (took 
>>office 1981, disclosed homosexuality 1989)
>>- First senate election in which both major party candidates were 
>>Jewish. (1990 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election 
>>
>> )
>>  
>>(1990)
>>- First independent Jewish member of the U.S. Congress 
>>/U.S. House of 
>>Representatives 
>>: 
>>Bernie Sanders  (1991)
>>- First Jewish female members of the United States Senate 
>>: Barbara Boxer 
>> and Dianne Feinstein 
>> (1993)
>>- First Jewish female Justice of the Supreme Court of the United 
>>States 
>>: Ruth 
>>Bader Ginsburg  
>>(1993)
>>- First Jewish nominee for Vice President of the United States 
>> 
>>on a major party ticket, and first Jewish candidate to receive an 
>> electoral 
>>vote excluding faithless electors: Joe Lieberman 
>> (2000)
>>- First Jewish elected official representing large constituency to 
>>serve past ninety years of age: David Cohen 
>> (2004)
>>- First Jewish whip 
>>
>> 
>>  
>>in the U.S. House of Representatives 
>>: 
>>Eric Cantor  (2009) (also 
>>first Jewish party whip in either house)
>>- First openly gay Jewish Congressman to be openly gay upon first 
>>election: Jared Polis  
>>(2009)
>>- Number of Jewish Senators rises from thirteen to fifteen (15% of 
>>all American Senators vs. approx. 2% of the general population) (2009)
>>- First Jewish floor leader 
>>
>> 
>>  
>>in the U.S. House of Representatives 
>>: 
>>Eric Cantor  (2011) (also 
>>first Jewish floor leader and Majority Leader in either house)
>>- First Jewish mayor of minority descent: Eric Garcetti 
>>, elected mayor of Los 
>>Angeles  (2013)
>>- First Jewish female Cabinet 
>> member/United 
>>States Secretary of Commerce 
>>: 
>> Penny 
>>Pritzker  (2013)
>>- First Jewish American to win a U.S. presidential primary: Bernie 
>>Sanders

Re: 5 days and counting

Going Home Plain Ol'?

( I take it, it's hunting season in Tennessee?)


On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:14 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

> [image: Image result for TWRA wild turkey pictures]
> [image: Image result for great deer pictures]
>
> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
> [image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

No.We've established who promotes it, (and yesWho capitlizes upon
it)  but you Sir, are a part and parcel of the proble, and yet you have the
audacity to point fingers at those who for maybe the right or wrong
reasons, attempt to help.

Typical.



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

> it's his crew who promote and aggrandize the whole "Open Borders/We
> Welcome The Illegal Aliens With Open Arms" Stchick!
> ---
> wrong ... that would be profit motivated jews and xians who suck money
> from our tax dollars in name of a mythical jewish god.
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 6:22:07 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Hah!
>>
>> Our resident Moonbat is back, atwitter with his usual "Deflect" patterns
>> and refusing to admit that it's his crew who promote and aggrandize the
>> whole "Open Borders/We Welcome The Illegal Aliens With Open Arms" Stchick!
>>
>> "*Everything Changes~~Nothing Changes*!"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:08 PM, plainolamerican 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> refugees being dumped in cities all over America
>>> ---
>>> Christian and Jewish charities sign up for self-destruction
>>> By Carol Brown 
>>>
>>> Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/christian_
>>> and_jewish_charities_sign_up_for_selfdestruction.html#ixzz4KeTQaYbY
>>>
>>> Christian and Jewish charities are at the epicenter of “refugee
>>> resettlement.” There’s a lot of money to be made providing services to
>>> colonizers (aka “refugees”). And infidels are tripping over themselves to
>>> sign on for what will ultimately be their own demise.
>>>
>>> Go figure.
>>>
>>> There are nine non-profit organizations (most of them religious
>>> charities) that are authorized by the State Department and the Department
>>> of Homeland Security to play a central role in all things refugee,
>>> particularly in “preferred communities
>>> .”
>>> These non-profits (and their affiliates
>>> ) have a monopoly on
>>> access to government grants for refugee-related programs and services –
>>> grants funded by the American taxpayer.
>>>
>>> Refugee Resettlement Watch (RRW) reports
>>> 
>>> the grants are above and beyond “what the contractors already get on a per
>>> head basis for the refugees they resettle.” And as one might expect, there
>>> is no accountability as to how the money is used.
>>>
>>> Noted below is an overview of the nine non-profits along with their
>>> mission statements and related links. You’ll notice their visions are
>>> variations on a theme. No doubt many of these organizations do some good
>>> work. But on the matter of Muslim colonizers and economic migrants, they
>>> are completely behind the curve. In fact most, if not all of these
>>> organizations are pressing for the United States to accept more “refugees”
>>> from the Islamic world. Once here, they have a range of resources to help
>>> them access all manner of benefits and services. Many of these
>>> organization’s web sites feature pictures of Muslim women in hijabs and/or
>>> pictures of Muslim children that would, they hope, melt your heart. The
>>> fact that one day some of them would cut your head off seems lost on
>>> the people who run these charities.
>>>
>>>
>>> HIAS, Inc. (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)/Refugee and Immigrant Services
>>>  “works around the world to protect refugees who
>>> have been forced to flee their homelands because of who they are, including
>>> ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. For more than 130 years, HIAS has
>>> been helping refugees rebuild their lives in safety and dignity.” Link to
>>> contact page, here .
>>>
>>>
>>> Church World Service/Immigration and Refugee Program
>>>  offers migrants “freedom, hope, and opportunity,”
>>> welcoming them when they arrive, facilitating access to community services,
>>> linking them with job opportunities, assisting with applications for
>>> permanent residency, family reunification, and naturalization, and
>>> providing English classes. Link to contact page, here
>>> . Link to businesses that support them,
>>> here .
>>>
>>>
>>> Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal
>>> Church
>>> 
>>>  advocates
>>> “for solutions to a variety of pressing issues, including domestic poverty,
>>> environmental protection and global justice. Some of its work revolves
>>> around improving

Re: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

Update your links ...Abe Beame was elected in 1974 to NYC Mayor!!!
---7
sorry .. my list started in 1970.


On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 6:22:26 PM UTC-5, brine wrote:
>
> Update your links ...Abe Beame was elected in 1974 to NYC Mayor!!!
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Beame 
> 
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>>
>>- First Jewish Secretary of State 
>>: Henry 
>>Kissinger  (1973)
>>- First Jewish female mayor of a major American city (San Francisco 
>>): Dianne Feinstein 
>> (1977)
>>- First Jewish female governor: Madeleine M. Kunin 
>> (1985)
>>- First Jewish openly gay member of the U.S. Congress 
>>/U.S. House of 
>>Representatives 
>>: 
>>Barney Frank  (took 
>>office 1981, disclosed homosexuality 1989)
>>- First senate election in which both major party candidates were 
>>Jewish. (1990 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election 
>>
>> )
>>  
>>(1990)
>>- First independent Jewish member of the U.S. Congress 
>>/U.S. House of 
>>Representatives 
>>: 
>>Bernie Sanders  (1991)
>>- First Jewish female members of the United States Senate 
>>: Barbara Boxer 
>> and Dianne Feinstein 
>> (1993)
>>- First Jewish female Justice of the Supreme Court of the United 
>>States 
>>: Ruth 
>>Bader Ginsburg  
>>(1993)
>>- First Jewish nominee for Vice President of the United States 
>> 
>>on a major party ticket, and first Jewish candidate to receive an 
>> electoral 
>>vote excluding faithless electors: Joe Lieberman 
>> (2000)
>>- First Jewish elected official representing large constituency to 
>>serve past ninety years of age: David Cohen 
>> (2004)
>>- First Jewish whip 
>>
>> 
>>  
>>in the U.S. House of Representatives 
>>: 
>>Eric Cantor  (2009) (also 
>>first Jewish party whip in either house)
>>- First openly gay Jewish Congressman to be openly gay upon first 
>>election: Jared Polis  
>>(2009)
>>- Number of Jewish Senators rises from thirteen to fifteen (15% of 
>>all American Senators vs. approx. 2% of the general population) (2009)
>>- First Jewish floor leader 
>>
>> 
>>  
>>in the U.S. House of Representatives 
>>: 
>>Eric Cantor  (2011) (also 
>>first Jewish floor leader and Majority Leader in either house)
>>- First Jewish mayor of minority descent: Eric Garcetti 
>>, elected mayor of Los 
>>Angeles  (2013)
>>- First Jewish female Cabinet 
>> member/United 
>>States Secretary of Commerce 
>>: 
>> Penny 
>>Pritzker  (2013)
>>- First Jewish American to win a U.S. presidential primary: Bernie 
>>Sanders , New Hampshire 
>>primary, (2016)[1] 
>>
>> 
>>[2] 
>>
>>

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

 it's his crew who promote and aggrandize the whole "Open Borders/We 
Welcome The Illegal Aliens With Open Arms" Stchick! 
---
wrong ... that would be profit motivated jews and xians who suck money from 
our tax dollars in name of a mythical jewish god.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 6:22:07 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Hah!
>
> Our resident Moonbat is back, atwitter with his usual "Deflect" patterns 
> and refusing to admit that it's his crew who promote and aggrandize the 
> whole "Open Borders/We Welcome The Illegal Aliens With Open Arms" Stchick! 
>
> "*Everything Changes~~Nothing Changes*!"
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>  
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:08 PM, plainolamerican  > wrote:
>
>> refugees being dumped in cities all over America
>> ---
>> Christian and Jewish charities sign up for self-destruction 
>> By Carol Brown 
>>
>> Read more: 
>> http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/christian_and_jewish_charities_sign_up_for_selfdestruction.html#ixzz4KeTQaYbY
>>  
>> Christian and Jewish charities are at the epicenter of “refugee 
>> resettlement.” There’s a lot of money to be made providing services to 
>> colonizers (aka “refugees”). And infidels are tripping over themselves to 
>> sign on for what will ultimately be their own demise.
>>
>> Go figure.
>>
>> There are nine non-profit organizations (most of them religious 
>> charities) that are authorized by the State Department and the Department 
>> of Homeland Security to play a central role in all things refugee, 
>> particularly in “preferred communities 
>> .”
>>  
>> These non-profits (and their affiliates 
>> ) have a monopoly on 
>> access to government grants for refugee-related programs and services – 
>> grants funded by the American taxpayer.
>>
>> Refugee Resettlement Watch (RRW) reports 
>> 
>>  
>> the grants are above and beyond “what the contractors already get on a per 
>> head basis for the refugees they resettle.” And as one might expect, there 
>> is no accountability as to how the money is used.
>>
>> Noted below is an overview of the nine non-profits along with their 
>> mission statements and related links. You’ll notice their visions are 
>> variations on a theme. No doubt many of these organizations do some good 
>> work. But on the matter of Muslim colonizers and economic migrants, they 
>> are completely behind the curve. In fact most, if not all of these 
>> organizations are pressing for the United States to accept more “refugees” 
>> from the Islamic world. Once here, they have a range of resources to help 
>> them access all manner of benefits and services. Many of these 
>> organization’s web sites feature pictures of Muslim women in hijabs and/or 
>> pictures of Muslim children that would, they hope, melt your heart. The 
>> fact that one day some of them would cut your head off seems lost on the 
>> people who run these charities.
>>
>>
>> HIAS, Inc. (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)/Refugee and Immigrant Services 
>>  “works around the world to protect refugees who 
>> have been forced to flee their homelands because of who they are, including 
>> ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. For more than 130 years, HIAS has 
>> been helping refugees rebuild their lives in safety and dignity.” Link to 
>> contact page, here .
>>
>>
>> Church World Service/Immigration and Refugee Program  
>> offers migrants “freedom, hope, and opportunity,” welcoming them when they 
>> arrive, facilitating access to community services, linking them with job 
>> opportunities, assisting with applications for permanent residency, family 
>> reunification, and naturalization, and providing English classes. Link to 
>> contact page, here . Link to businesses 
>> that support them, here .
>>
>>
>> Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church 
>> 
>>  advocates 
>> “for solutions to a variety of pressing issues, including domestic poverty, 
>> environmental protection and global justice. Some of its work revolves 
>> around improving access to healthy food in poor and minority communities -- 
>> the same communities that are often most negatively impacted by ecological 
>> degradation.” Link to contact page, here 
>> .
>>
>>
>> Ethiopian Community Development Council, Inc./Refugee Resettlement Program 
>>  has resettled more 25,000 refugees. 
>> They

5 days and counting

[image: Image result for TWRA wild turkey pictures]
[image: Image result for great deer pictures]

[image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
[image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
[image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]
[image: Image result for crazy deer blinds]

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

2016-09-18 Thread Brian Bednarek

The NYC and NJ attacks have yet to be confirmed to be Islamic terrorism,
Governor Cuomo called the NY attack terrorism, but not sure if it is
international ... all attacks on citizens is terrorism ... I remember
living in the UK during the "Irish Problem" ... we may have a lot of local
assholes doing shit!!!


On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a
> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman
> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag
> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>
> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week, but
> can't recall where it was.
>
> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease in
> terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of the
> above happens within a few days.
>
> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected
> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and
> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow
> upon them.
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
brine
http://brineb.blogspot.com/

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

Plain Ol'?

Do you think that Huma Abedin; (unlike her idiotic husband Anthony Weiner)
is Jewish?   (It wouldn't surprise me!)

FYI: Huma is a MuslimSo therefore, what you just posted has absolutely
nothing to do with what we, the adults are talking about in this thread!
Again.ReadStudy, try to stay informed!



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

>
>- First Jewish Secretary of State
>: Henry
>Kissinger  (1973)
>- First Jewish female mayor of a major American city (San Francisco
>): Dianne Feinstein
> (1977)
>- First Jewish female governor: Madeleine M. Kunin
> (1985)
>- First Jewish openly gay member of the U.S. Congress
>/U.S. House of
>Representatives
>:
>Barney Frank  (took office
>1981, disclosed homosexuality 1989)
>- First senate election in which both major party candidates were
>Jewish. (1990 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election
>
> )
>(1990)
>- First independent Jewish member of the U.S. Congress
>/U.S. House of
>Representatives
>:
>Bernie Sanders  (1991)
>- First Jewish female members of the United States Senate
>: Barbara Boxer
> and Dianne Feinstein
> (1993)
>- First Jewish female Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
>: Ruth
>Bader Ginsburg 
>(1993)
>- First Jewish nominee for Vice President of the United States
> on
>a major party ticket, and first Jewish candidate to receive an electoral
>vote excluding faithless electors: Joe Lieberman
> (2000)
>- First Jewish elected official representing large constituency to
>serve past ninety years of age: David Cohen
> (2004)
>- First Jewish whip
>
> 
>in the U.S. House of Representatives
>:
>Eric Cantor  (2009) (also
>first Jewish party whip in either house)
>- First openly gay Jewish Congressman to be openly gay upon first
>election: Jared Polis 
>(2009)
>- Number of Jewish Senators rises from thirteen to fifteen (15% of all
>American Senators vs. approx. 2% of the general population) (2009)
>- First Jewish floor leader
>
> 
>in the U.S. House of Representatives
>:
>Eric Cantor  (2011) (also
>first Jewish floor leader and Majority Leader in either house)
>- First Jewish mayor of minority descent: Eric Garcetti
>, elected mayor of Los
>Angeles  (2013)
>- First Jewish female Cabinet
> member/United
>States Secretary of Commerce
>: Penny
>Pritzker  (2013)
>- First Jewish American to win a U.S. presidential primary: Bernie
>Sanders , New Hampshire
>primary, (2016)[1]
>
> 
>[2]
>
> 
>[3]
>
> 
>[4]
>
>

Re: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

We don't like muslims .ok? and don't bother with the islamaphobia bull shit
I'm happy and proud to be deplorable

On Sep 18, 2016 6:13 PM, "plainolamerican" 
wrote:

>
>- First Jewish Secretary of State
>: Henry
>Kissinger  (1973)
>- First Jewish female mayor of a major American city (San Francisco
>): Dianne Feinstein
> (1977)
>- First Jewish female governor: Madeleine M. Kunin
> (1985)
>- First Jewish openly gay member of the U.S. Congress
>/U.S. House of
>Representatives
>:
>Barney Frank  (took office
>1981, disclosed homosexuality 1989)
>- First senate election in which both major party candidates were
>Jewish. (1990 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election
>
> )
>(1990)
>- First independent Jewish member of the U.S. Congress
>/U.S. House of
>Representatives
>:
>Bernie Sanders  (1991)
>- First Jewish female members of the United States Senate
>: Barbara Boxer
> and Dianne Feinstein
> (1993)
>- First Jewish female Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
>: Ruth
>Bader Ginsburg 
>(1993)
>- First Jewish nominee for Vice President of the United States
> on
>a major party ticket, and first Jewish candidate to receive an electoral
>vote excluding faithless electors: Joe Lieberman
> (2000)
>- First Jewish elected official representing large constituency to
>serve past ninety years of age: David Cohen
> (2004)
>- First Jewish whip
>
> 
>in the U.S. House of Representatives
>:
>Eric Cantor  (2009) (also
>first Jewish party whip in either house)
>- First openly gay Jewish Congressman to be openly gay upon first
>election: Jared Polis 
>(2009)
>- Number of Jewish Senators rises from thirteen to fifteen (15% of all
>American Senators vs. approx. 2% of the general population) (2009)
>- First Jewish floor leader
>
> 
>in the U.S. House of Representatives
>:
>Eric Cantor  (2011) (also
>first Jewish floor leader and Majority Leader in either house)
>- First Jewish mayor of minority descent: Eric Garcetti
>, elected mayor of Los
>Angeles  (2013)
>- First Jewish female Cabinet
> member/United
>States Secretary of Commerce
>: Penny
>Pritzker  (2013)
>- First Jewish American to win a U.S. presidential primary: Bernie
>Sanders , New Hampshire
>primary, (2016)[1]
>
> 
>[2]
>
> 
>[3]
>
> 
>[4]
>
> 
>(Barry Goldwater , the
>1964 Republican presidential nominee, was the first winner of Jewish
>heritage, but was a Christian).[5]
>

Re: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

2016-09-18 Thread Brian Bednarek

Update your links ...Abe Beame was elected in 1974 to NYC Mayor!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Beame

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, plainolamerican 
wrote:

>
>- First Jewish Secretary of State
>: Henry
>Kissinger  (1973)
>- First Jewish female mayor of a major American city (San Francisco
>): Dianne Feinstein
> (1977)
>- First Jewish female governor: Madeleine M. Kunin
> (1985)
>- First Jewish openly gay member of the U.S. Congress
>/U.S. House of
>Representatives
>:
>Barney Frank  (took office
>1981, disclosed homosexuality 1989)
>- First senate election in which both major party candidates were
>Jewish. (1990 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election
>
> )
>(1990)
>- First independent Jewish member of the U.S. Congress
>/U.S. House of
>Representatives
>:
>Bernie Sanders  (1991)
>- First Jewish female members of the United States Senate
>: Barbara Boxer
> and Dianne Feinstein
> (1993)
>- First Jewish female Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
>: Ruth
>Bader Ginsburg 
>(1993)
>- First Jewish nominee for Vice President of the United States
> on
>a major party ticket, and first Jewish candidate to receive an electoral
>vote excluding faithless electors: Joe Lieberman
> (2000)
>- First Jewish elected official representing large constituency to
>serve past ninety years of age: David Cohen
> (2004)
>- First Jewish whip
>
> 
>in the U.S. House of Representatives
>:
>Eric Cantor  (2009) (also
>first Jewish party whip in either house)
>- First openly gay Jewish Congressman to be openly gay upon first
>election: Jared Polis 
>(2009)
>- Number of Jewish Senators rises from thirteen to fifteen (15% of all
>American Senators vs. approx. 2% of the general population) (2009)
>- First Jewish floor leader
>
> 
>in the U.S. House of Representatives
>:
>Eric Cantor  (2011) (also
>first Jewish floor leader and Majority Leader in either house)
>- First Jewish mayor of minority descent: Eric Garcetti
>, elected mayor of Los
>Angeles  (2013)
>- First Jewish female Cabinet
> member/United
>States Secretary of Commerce
>: Penny
>Pritzker  (2013)
>- First Jewish American to win a U.S. presidential primary: Bernie
>Sanders , New Hampshire
>primary, (2016)[1]
>
> 
>[2]
>
> 
>[3]
>
> 
>[4]
>
> 
>(Barry Goldwater , the
>1964 Republican presidential nominee, was the first winner of Jewish
>heritage, but was a

Re: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails


   
   - First Jewish Secretary of State 
   : Henry 
   Kissinger  (1973)
   - First Jewish female mayor of a major American city (San Francisco 
   ): Dianne Feinstein 
    (1977)
   - First Jewish female governor: Madeleine M. Kunin 
    (1985)
   - First Jewish openly gay member of the U.S. Congress 
   /U.S. House of 
   Representatives 
   : 
Barney 
   Frank  (took office 1981, 
   disclosed homosexuality 1989)
   - First senate election in which both major party candidates were 
   Jewish. (1990 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election 
   
)
 
   (1990)
   - First independent Jewish member of the U.S. Congress 
   /U.S. House of 
   Representatives 
   : 
Bernie 
   Sanders  (1991)
   - First Jewish female members of the United States Senate 
   : Barbara Boxer 
    and Dianne Feinstein 
    (1993)
   - First Jewish female Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States 
   : Ruth 
   Bader Ginsburg  (1993)
   - First Jewish nominee for Vice President of the United States 
    on a 
   major party ticket, and first Jewish candidate to receive an electoral vote 
   excluding faithless electors: Joe Lieberman 
    (2000)
   - First Jewish elected official representing large constituency to serve 
   past ninety years of age: David Cohen 
    (2004)
   - First Jewish whip 
   

 
   in the U.S. House of Representatives 
   : Eric 
   Cantor  (2009) (also first 
   Jewish party whip in either house)
   - First openly gay Jewish Congressman to be openly gay upon first 
   election: Jared Polis  (2009)
   - Number of Jewish Senators rises from thirteen to fifteen (15% of all 
   American Senators vs. approx. 2% of the general population) (2009)
   - First Jewish floor leader 
   

 
   in the U.S. House of Representatives 
   : Eric 
   Cantor  (2011) (also first 
   Jewish floor leader and Majority Leader in either house)
   - First Jewish mayor of minority descent: Eric Garcetti 
   , elected mayor of Los 
   Angeles  (2013)
   - First Jewish female Cabinet 
    member/United 
   States Secretary of Commerce 
   : Penny 
   Pritzker  (2013)
   - First Jewish American to win a U.S. presidential primary: Bernie 
   Sanders , New Hampshire 
   primary, (2016)[1] 
   

   [2] 
   

   [3] 
   

   [4] 
   

 
   (Barry Goldwater , the 
   1964 Republican presidential nominee, was the first winner of Jewish 
   heritage, but was a Christian).[5] 
   




On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:17:43 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

refugees being dumped in cities all over America
---
Christian and Jewish charities sign up for self-destruction
By Carol Brown

Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/christian_and_jewish_charities_sign_up_for_selfdestruction.html#ixzz4KeTQaYbY

Christian and Jewish charities are at the epicenter of “refugee
resettlement.” There’s a lot of money to be made providing services to
colonizers (aka “refugees”). And infidels are tripping over themselves to
sign on for what will ultimately be their own demise.

Go figure.

There are nine non-profit organizations (most of them religious charities)
that are authorized by the State Department and the Department of Homeland
Security to play a central role in all things refugee, particularly in
“preferred
communities
.”

These non-profits (and their affiliates
) have a monopoly on
access to government grants for refugee-related programs and services –
grants funded by the American taxpayer.

Refugee Resettlement Watch (RRW) reports

the grants are above and beyond “what the contractors already get on a per
head basis for the refugees they resettle.” And as one might expect, there
is no accountability as to how the money is used.

Noted below is an overview of the nine non-profits along with their mission
statements and related links. You’ll notice their visions are variations on
a theme. No doubt many of these organizations do some good work. But on the
matter of Muslim colonizers and economic migrants, they are completely
behind the curve. In fact most, if not all of these organizations are
pressing for the United States to accept more “refugees” from the Islamic
world. Once here, they have a range of resources to help them access all
manner of benefits and services. Many of these organization’s web sites
feature pictures of Muslim women in hijabs and/or pictures of Muslim
children that would, they hope, melt your heart. The fact that one day some
of them would cut your head off seems lost on the people who run these
charities.

HIAS, Inc. (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)/Refugee and Immigrant Services
“works around the world to protect refugees who have
been forced to flee their homelands because of who they are, including
ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities. For more than 130 years, HIAS has
been helping refugees rebuild their lives in safety and dignity.” Link to
contact page, here .

Church World Service/Immigration and Refugee Program
offers migrants “freedom, hope, and opportunity,” welcoming them when they
arrive, facilitating access to community services, linking them with job
opportunities, assisting with applications for permanent residency, family
reunification, and naturalization, and providing English classes. Link to
contact page, here . Link to businesses that
support them, here .

Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church

advocates
“for solutions to a variety of pressing issues, including domestic poverty,
environmental protection and global justice. Some of its work revolves
around improving access to healthy food in poor and minority communities --
the same communities that are often most negatively impacted by ecological
degradation.” Link to contact page, here
.

Ethiopian Community Development Council, Inc./Refugee Resettlement Program
has resettled more 25,000 refugees. They
“work with each refugee for an initial 30-day period that can be extended
up to 90 days after arrival.” They provide a range of services, including
welcoming refugees at the airport, providing housing, furniture, food, and
clothing. They also help them enroll in school, find jobs, and access
health care, among other public services. Link to contact page, here
. Link to partners (the majority of
which are the other non-profits on this list) here
.

International Rescue Committee/Resettlement
“responds to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and helps people to
survive and rebuild their lives. At work in over 40 countries and 25 U.S.
cities to restore safety, dignity, and hope, the IRC leads the way form
harm to home.” Link to contact page, here
.

Lutheran

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers

I read an interesting article on this the other day. I can't recall who 
said it, but the author said that before this years' election started he'd 
longed for a republican candidate who would REFUSE to apologize to these 
self-annointed "superiors" that progressive nutjobs view themselves as 
being.

I think he could do a better job of rubbing their noses in their tendency 
to be such arrogant asshole bigots than he does, but hey, nobody's perfect.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 3:01:11 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote:
>
> I can't see how nobody saw this coming. I will refer to the culprits as 
> the uniparty because Keith's label is just to damn many words to type :) 
> when stepinopolis or whatever tried to pin Romney on the contraception 
> issue followed by the war on women that was when the rhetoric from the 
> establishment started on the path of diminishing returns. They just tried 
> to misdirect the Trump campaign by bringing up the birther issue and got 
> their heads handed to them.
> And now the never Trump globalist traitors from the republicans continue 
> to shoot themselves in the foot.just call me deplorable.
>
> On Sep 18, 2016 1:06 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
> politic...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree completely, Keith. And I also think these "Never Trump" morons 
>> are 100% deluded if they think they won't pay for what they are doing now 
>> in 4 or 8 years and possibly beyond.
>>
>> The battle lines have been drawn. Either you accept the status quo of the 
>> establishment/political/ruling totally disconnected career politicians from 
>> BOTH parties, or you don't. And there is no way in hell half of Trump 
>> voters will ever forget or forgive or excuse the attacks from the sore 
>> losers in the GOP who - even if they didn't want to support Trump - didn't 
>> have the common sense to shut the F up and keep it to themselves.
>>
>> Kasich, Cruz, ALL of the Bush family, Flake, Graham - all of them have 
>> absolutely ZERO chance of doing anything but whimpering and bitching and 
>> losing national elections in the future.
>>
>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I once 
>>> was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but the 
>>> attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.  
>>>
>>> They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.  
>>>
>>> More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and 
>>> Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has 
>>> shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known 
>>> that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!  
>>> That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World Order" 
>>> crew I can never support again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  wrote:
>>>

 *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this 
 criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago 
 were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were 
 gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high 
 “conservative” 
 principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that 
 Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016

 *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
 *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and 
 McCain that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried

 A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican 
 commentator (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a commentary 
  intended to deescalate 
 the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh 
 defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who decided to support the 
 Donald 
 as the lesser of two evils after his preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled 
 in the primaries. Limbaugh does not hide his dislike for Trump’s 
 free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the GOP nominee’s critics on the 
 right may be fully justified in doubting his “genuine commitment to 
 conservative policies.”

 Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also 
 hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder, 
 and 
 yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our [conservative] 
 policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is also, not 
 incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working class 
 constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least as 
 well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP 
 centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.


Great observation. The sleepy electorate is awakening. I also think more 
and more people get their news online rather than from the hacks on 
television, and that has helped to wake people up as well.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 3:11:58 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote:
>
> The strategy as I see it has been to keep the populace in a state of 
> unease if not outright fear what with terrorism, the economy, national 
> reporting of local gun violence that gives the impression that gun violence 
> is increasing except now a local incident from podunk anystate is reported 
> on national news. Well that fear is turning to angry awareness 
>
> On Sep 18, 2016 1:42 PM, "Keith In Tampa"  > wrote:
>
>> I believe that it's a concerted effort to attempt to hide these attacks 
>> PerpThe Establishment Media are now hat and hand with the Open 
>> Borders/Globalist crew, and will gladly brand a terrorist attack or any 
>> Muslim affiliated crime as, "Work Place Violence" or mental incompetency.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
>> politic...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a 
>>> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman 
>>> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag 
>>> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>>>
>>> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week, 
>>> but can't recall where it was.
>>>
>>> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease 
>>> in terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of 
>>> the above happens within a few days.
>>>
>>> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected 
>>> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and 
>>> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow 
>>> upon them.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>  
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.


Yep; I don't disagree with that. They aren't sensationalizing all the sh*t 
going on in Europe with the influx of savage refugees, either. They're 
largely keeping that silent.

And their silence is DEAFENING about refugees being dumped in cities all 
over America with millions of people who can't find jobs.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 2:42:16 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> I believe that it's a concerted effort to attempt to hide these attacks 
> PerpThe Establishment Media are now hat and hand with the Open 
> Borders/Globalist crew, and will gladly brand a terrorist attack or any 
> Muslim affiliated crime as, "Work Place Violence" or mental incompetency.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
> politic...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>>
>> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a 
>> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman 
>> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag 
>> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>>
>> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week, 
>> but can't recall where it was.
>>
>> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease 
>> in terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of 
>> the above happens within a few days.
>>
>> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected 
>> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and 
>> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow 
>> upon them.
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to politicalforu...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

One cause for hope is that the reported poll results are showing Trump even
or ahead as opposed to being so far behind that the gap was insurmountable
those hard headed deplorable folks just won't listen

On Sep 18, 2016 2:56 PM, "Keith In Tampa"  wrote:

> I agree, (again) but I hope Americans turn that "Anger" and "Fear" into
> voting for change!  (I think that they will!)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:11 PM, geoffrey theist 
> wrote:
>
>> The strategy as I see it has been to keep the populace in a state of
>> unease if not outright fear what with terrorism, the economy, national
>> reporting of local gun violence that gives the impression that gun violence
>> is increasing except now a local incident from podunk anystate is reported
>> on national news. Well that fear is turning to angry awareness
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2016 1:42 PM, "Keith In Tampa"  wrote:
>>
>>> I believe that it's a concerted effort to attempt to hide these attacks
>>> PerpThe Establishment Media are now hat and hand with the Open
>>> Borders/Globalist crew, and will gladly brand a terrorist attack or any
>>> Muslim affiliated crime as, "Work Place Violence" or mental incompetency.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
>>> politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>

 Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a
 lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman
 who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag
 stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.

 I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week,
 but can't recall where it was.

 I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease
 in terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of
 the above happens within a few days.

 Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected
 and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and
 terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow
 upon them.

 --
 --
 Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
 For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

 * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
 * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
 * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

I agree, (again) but I hope Americans turn that "Anger" and "Fear" into
voting for change!  (I think that they will!)



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:11 PM, geoffrey theist 
wrote:

> The strategy as I see it has been to keep the populace in a state of
> unease if not outright fear what with terrorism, the economy, national
> reporting of local gun violence that gives the impression that gun violence
> is increasing except now a local incident from podunk anystate is reported
> on national news. Well that fear is turning to angry awareness
>
> On Sep 18, 2016 1:42 PM, "Keith In Tampa"  wrote:
>
>> I believe that it's a concerted effort to attempt to hide these attacks
>> PerpThe Establishment Media are now hat and hand with the Open
>> Borders/Globalist crew, and will gladly brand a terrorist attack or any
>> Muslim affiliated crime as, "Work Place Violence" or mental incompetency.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
>> politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a
>>> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman
>>> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag
>>> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>>>
>>> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week,
>>> but can't recall where it was.
>>>
>>> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease
>>> in terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of
>>> the above happens within a few days.
>>>
>>> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected
>>> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and
>>> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow
>>> upon them.
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers

(And I also agree with everything you just wrote.I hope we're finished
with the whole "Birther" Discussion or at a minimum, let's focus on the
Clinton 2008 Campaign who was in the game full bore!)



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Keith In Tampa 
wrote:

> ! Hey Geoffrey!  "Uni-Party" works well!  We all understand it and I
> will start adopting that term!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM, geoffrey theist 
> wrote:
>
>> I can't see how nobody saw this coming. I will refer to the culprits as
>> the uniparty because Keith's label is just to damn many words to type :)
>> when stepinopolis or whatever tried to pin Romney on the contraception
>> issue followed by the war on women that was when the rhetoric from the
>> establishment started on the path of diminishing returns. They just tried
>> to misdirect the Trump campaign by bringing up the birther issue and got
>> their heads handed to them.
>> And now the never Trump globalist traitors from the republicans continue
>> to shoot themselves in the foot.just call me deplorable.
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2016 1:06 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
>> politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I agree completely, Keith. And I also think these "Never Trump" morons
>>> are 100% deluded if they think they won't pay for what they are doing now
>>> in 4 or 8 years and possibly beyond.
>>>
>>> The battle lines have been drawn. Either you accept the status quo of
>>> the establishment/political/ruling totally disconnected career politicians
>>> from BOTH parties, or you don't. And there is no way in hell half of Trump
>>> voters will ever forget or forgive or excuse the attacks from the sore
>>> losers in the GOP who - even if they didn't want to support Trump - didn't
>>> have the common sense to shut the F up and keep it to themselves.
>>>
>>> Kasich, Cruz, ALL of the Bush family, Flake, Graham - all of them have
>>> absolutely ZERO chance of doing anything but whimpering and bitching and
>>> losing national elections in the future.
>>>
>>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:

 Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I
 once was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but
 the attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.


 They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.

 More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and
 Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has
 shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known
 that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!
 That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World
 Order" crew I can never support again.



 On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  wrote:

>
>
> *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this
> criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago
> were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were
> gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high 
> “conservative”
> principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that
> Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016
>
> *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
> *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and
> McCain that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried
>
> A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican
> commentator (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a
> commentary  intended
> to deescalate the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the
> “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who
> decided to support the Donald as the lesser of two evils after his
> preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled in the primaries. Limbaugh does not
> hide his dislike for Trump’s free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the
> GOP nominee’s critics on the right may be fully justified in doubting his
> “genuine commitment to conservative policies.”
>
> Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one
> also hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry
> Elder, and yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our
> [conservative] policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is
> also, not incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working
> class constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least
> as well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP
> centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain.

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers

! Hey Geoffrey!  "Uni-Party" works well!  We all understand it and I
will start adopting that term!

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:00 PM, geoffrey theist 
wrote:

> I can't see how nobody saw this coming. I will refer to the culprits as
> the uniparty because Keith's label is just to damn many words to type :)
> when stepinopolis or whatever tried to pin Romney on the contraception
> issue followed by the war on women that was when the rhetoric from the
> establishment started on the path of diminishing returns. They just tried
> to misdirect the Trump campaign by bringing up the birther issue and got
> their heads handed to them.
> And now the never Trump globalist traitors from the republicans continue
> to shoot themselves in the foot.just call me deplorable.
>
> On Sep 18, 2016 1:06 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
> politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree completely, Keith. And I also think these "Never Trump" morons
>> are 100% deluded if they think they won't pay for what they are doing now
>> in 4 or 8 years and possibly beyond.
>>
>> The battle lines have been drawn. Either you accept the status quo of the
>> establishment/political/ruling totally disconnected career politicians from
>> BOTH parties, or you don't. And there is no way in hell half of Trump
>> voters will ever forget or forgive or excuse the attacks from the sore
>> losers in the GOP who - even if they didn't want to support Trump - didn't
>> have the common sense to shut the F up and keep it to themselves.
>>
>> Kasich, Cruz, ALL of the Bush family, Flake, Graham - all of them have
>> absolutely ZERO chance of doing anything but whimpering and bitching and
>> losing national elections in the future.
>>
>> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I once
>>> was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but the
>>> attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.
>>>
>>> They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.
>>>
>>> More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and
>>> Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has
>>> shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known
>>> that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!
>>> That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World
>>> Order" crew I can never support again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  wrote:
>>>

 *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this
 criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago
 were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were
 gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative”
 principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that
 Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016

 *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
 *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and
 McCain that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried

 A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican
 commentator (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a commentary
  intended to deescalate
 the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh
 defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who decided to support the Donald
 as the lesser of two evils after his preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled
 in the primaries. Limbaugh does not hide his dislike for Trump’s
 free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the GOP nominee’s critics on the
 right may be fully justified in doubting his “genuine commitment to
 conservative policies.”

 Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also
 hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder, and
 yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our [conservative]
 policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is also, not
 incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working class
 constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least as
 well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP
 centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain. Moreover, it is hard
 not to see Trump’s focusing on the problems of illegals and sanctuary
 cities as anything other than a “conservative” issue. That remains the case
 even if most of his primary competitors and certainly the editorial board
 of the *Wall Street Journal* might wish those issues had never been
 brought into the primaries.

 Although Limbaugh

Fwd: [grendelreport] New Liberal Outrage: Angry that Trump's Sons Killed a Triceratops on a Hunting Trip!

New Liberal Outrage:

Angry that Trump’s Sons Killed a Triceratops on a Hunting Trip!



Another Mark Dice presentation.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNHqJ936DgA









--
[image: Avast logo] 

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com 



__._,_.___
--
Posted by: "Beowulf" 
--


Visit Your Group



[image: Yahoo! Groups]

• Privacy  •
Unsubscribe 
• Terms of Use 

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Fwd: [grendelreport] Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

http://www.smobserved.com/story/2016/09/17/news/huma-abedin-
to-be-clintons-secretary-of-state-say-wiki-leaked-emails/1969.html
Huma Abedin to be Clinton's Secretary of State, Say Wiki-leaked Emails

*As President, Hillary Clinton will appoint Huma Abedin as Secretary of
State. This according to leaked e mails between Abedin, Mrs. Clinton, and
Clinton's former chief of staff Cheryl Mills.*

Abedin, 40, would be the first Moslem Secretary of State, and One of the
Youngest Ever. She would not, however, be the first foreign born Secretary
of State. Henry Kissinger, 94, has that distinction, having been appointed
by Richard Nixon.

Huma Mahmood Abedin, 40, served as vice chairwoman of Hillary Clinton's
2016 campaign for President. Prior to that, she served as the deputy chief
of staff to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from 2009 to 2013.

ABedin parlayed a 1996 Whitehouse internship into a role as Mrs. Clinton's
Right Hand Man, or Woman.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is listed as the supervisor
certifying Abedin's designation as a "special government employee. This
classification allowed Abedin to work for an outside consulting firm and
the Clinton Foundation, at the same time that she advised then Secretary of
State Clinton. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/clinton-abedin-state-j
ob-approved-214038#ixzz4KYuDW8UF

The Clinton campaign reiterated Sunday that Clinton did not personally sign
documents for Abedin, or other employees. Hillary Clinton's name was listed
in print, but the signature underneath was redacted by the State
Department. The document caused a stir and led to media reports Clinton had
lied about not having been involved..

Clinton had said on TV weeks ago that she "was not directly involved" in
Abedin's SGE status, a position that is currently under investigation by
the Senate Judiciary Committee for potential conflicts of interest.

According to documents obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch
through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, released Thursday, Clinton
was the immediate supervisor named on one of the documents that transition
her to this new post, permitting her then-deputy chief of staff to serve
simultaneously as an outside consultant.

The campaign on Sunday said signed the form, not Clinton herself. Mills
would have the authority to sign such forms for Abedin.

*Prior to that she was traveling chief of staff and served as assistant for
Clinton during Clinton's campaign for the Democratic nomination in the 2008
presidential election.*

She is married to, but separated from, Anthony Weiner, a former U.S.
Representative from New York. Weiner has been a major embarrassment to the
Clintons. Weiner has a penchant for sending partially clothed photos of
himself to women he's met on the internet. But unless you've been on Mars
this year, you already know that story.

*Despite having grown up in different countries, Abedin and Clinton have a
lot more in common then husbands with a history of philandering. It makes
sense that Clinton would want to appoint Abedin to her old job leading the
State Department. Secretary of State is third in line to the president,
under the US Constitution. It also makes sense that Clinton would want her
right hand woman to back up herself and Vice President Tim Kaine in that
way as well.*

Abedin has served as vice chairwoman for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign
for president since 2015 and continues in her role as personal assistant to
Clinton. Her elevation to the No. 3 position in the campaign was a
"transformative shift... to campaign power center of her own," according to
Politico. She screened and interviewed applicants for key campaign roles,
including campaign manager Robby Mook, and was the primary channel for
communications to Clinton before the campaign officially began. After
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump proposed banning Muslims
from entering the United States, she wrote an open letter to Clinton
supporters calling herself "a proud Muslim" and criticized Trump's plan as
"literally (writing) racism into our law books".

In a letter dated June 13, 2012, to the State Department Inspector General,
five Republican members of Congress-Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, Trent
Franks of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Thomas J. Rooney of Florida, and
Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia-claimed that Abedin "has three family members
– her late father, her mother and her brother – connected to Muslim
Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations."

The five members of Congress alleged that Abedin had "immediate family
connections to foreign extremist organizations" which they said were
"potentially disqualifying conditions for obtaining a security clearance"
and questioned why Abedin had not been "disqualified for a security
clearance."

The claims in the letter were generally rejected, and were labeled by some
as conspiracy theories. The Washington Post editorial board called the
allegations "paranoid," a

Fwd: [grendelreport] Obama Was the Original Birther

September 18, 2016

*Obama Was the Original Birther*

By Brian Joondeph 

Barack Obama’s life story is back in the news after Donald Trump played
rope-a-dope with the dopey media once again. Brilliantly he duped the major
networks into giving him 30 minutes of free airtime culminating in a few
sentences ending

his involvement in the birther controversy. The only thing Trump could have
added is a fourth sentence quoting previous birther Hillary Clinton, “What
difference, at this point, does it make?”

Big media is howling after being played once again by the master showman.
And the birther issue is back in the news at a point where it really
doesn’t matter anyway given only a few months left in Obama’s presidency.
Since the subject has been resurrected, it would be instructive to look
back and see who started all of this.

Long ago in 1991 when Bill Clinton, to borrow Colin Powell’s description,
was “D---ing bimbos” in Arkansas, Barack Obama was a Visiting Law and
Government Fellow  at the
University of Chicago Law School. During his fellowship he began writing
his first book, *Dreams From My Father*. The aspiring author had a literary
agency, Acton and Dystel, which prepared a promotional booklet including a
brief Obama biography. They printed similar bios for the other 89 authors
they represented. Standard practice in the publishing world.

In the bio, Obama is described
 as “Born in
Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”. This booklet was first published
in Brietbart and verified
 by Snopes. The
excuse for the birthplace discrepancy is that the bio was written by some
editor at the literary agency, not by Obama himself. Which may very well be
true. But where did the editor get this information?

Remember that in 1991, the internet was just in process of being invented
by Al Gore. One couldn’t run a web search for Barack Obama and his
background and education. As president of the Harvard Law Review, he
published

nothing. As he was a recent law school graduate, there would be little in
the public library about his background. The New York Times published

a short article in 1990 announcing Obama’s election to the Harvard Law
Review, but with no mention of his being born in Kenya. In fact, the
article in the Times stated that he was born in Hawaii.

The logical conclusion is that what the literary editor wrote for the Obama
bio, particularly the part of him being born in Kenya, had to come from
Obama himself. Why would an editor cherry pick some information from the
New York Times article and manufacture something else about his place of
birth?

This is the Times bio
.
“His late father, Barack Obama, was a finance minister in Kenya and his
mother, Ann Dunham, is an American anthropologist now doing fieldwork in
Indonesia. Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii.” The literary bio said essentially
the same thing, except changing the birthplace to Kenya. This bio was
written by a literary agency, not a politician’s press office. Literary
publishing is about accuracy and it’s a stretch to believe the agent made
this change without first running it by Obama.

The “Born in Kenya” certainly spices up the bio and that may have been the
sole reason for Obama to alter his birthplace. After all, his goal at this
point was to sell books. What’s a little stretch or exaggeration compared
to the greater good of launching his writing career? Much like, “If you
like your insurance” or “If you like your doctor.” Other tall tales used to
promote a lofty agenda.

As Obama’s school records are sealed, there is no way of knowing if he
promoted himself as “foreign born” earlier in his educational career.
Perhaps for admission preference or financial aid, but pure speculation in
the absence of his actual school records. Meaning that his literary bio
represents the first promotion of his being born in Kenya.

If this was a mere oversight, it would have quickly been corrected. Instead
16 years went by with the bio neither revised nor updated. It was finally
corrected

in 2007 when Obama announced his Presidential candidacy. During that
Presidential campaign, the birth issue was not raised by Obama’s opponent
John McCain. McCain actually went so far as to chastise anyone for even
mentioning Obama’s middle name of Hussein.

Instead it was

Fwd: [New post] Police humor!

DCG posted: " DCG"
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on *Fellowship of the Minds*
 Police humor!
 by DCG







DCG
*DCG * | September 18, 2016
at 6:30 am | Categories: Animals
, Humor
 | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-zqN

Comment 
   See all comments


Unsubscribe

to no longer receive posts from Fellowship of the Minds.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
.


*Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/09/18/police-humor/
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com 

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Fwd: [New post] Trump: Hillary Clinton First Presidential Candidate Proposing to Abolish U.S. Borders

Harold posted: "Julia Hahn 9/17/2016 Source . Republican nominee Donald
Trump addressed the stakes of the 2016 election and delineated the
differences between his immigration plan and Hillary Clinton’s at an
luncheon to honor “America’s most forgotten f"
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on *ACGR's "News with Attitude"*
 Trump: Hillary Clinton First
Presidential Candidate Proposing to Abolish U.S. Borders
 by Harold


Julia Hahn 9/17/2016 Source . Republican nominee Donald Trump addressed
the stakes of the 2016 election and delineated the differences between his
immigration plan and Hillary Clinton’s at an luncheon to honor “America’s
most forgotten families”– the victims of illegal alien crime. “Your cause
and your stories are ignored by our political establishment because they […]

Read more of this post 
*Harold * | September 18,
2016 at 9:17 am | Categories: Border Patrol
, Corruption
, Criminal Activity
, DHS
, Elections/Voting
, Executive
, Government
, ICE
, Illegal Aliens
, Media
, Mexican Government
, Progressives
, Propaganda
, Sovereignty
, States Rights
, U.S. Constitution
 | URL: http://wp.me/pmtmV-bfY

Comment See
all comments 

Unsubscribe

to no longer receive posts from ACGR's "News with Attitude".
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
.


*Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/01-1764/
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com 

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

The strategy as I see it has been to keep the populace in a state of unease
if not outright fear what with terrorism, the economy, national reporting
of local gun violence that gives the impression that gun violence is
increasing except now a local incident from podunk anystate is reported on
national news. Well that fear is turning to angry awareness

On Sep 18, 2016 1:42 PM, "Keith In Tampa"  wrote:

> I believe that it's a concerted effort to attempt to hide these attacks
> PerpThe Establishment Media are now hat and hand with the Open
> Borders/Globalist crew, and will gladly brand a terrorist attack or any
> Muslim affiliated crime as, "Work Place Violence" or mental incompetency.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
> politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a
>> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman
>> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag
>> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>>
>> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week,
>> but can't recall where it was.
>>
>> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease
>> in terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of
>> the above happens within a few days.
>>
>> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected
>> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and
>> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow
>> upon them.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers

I can't see how nobody saw this coming. I will refer to the culprits as the
uniparty because Keith's label is just to damn many words to type :) when
stepinopolis or whatever tried to pin Romney on the contraception issue
followed by the war on women that was when the rhetoric from the
establishment started on the path of diminishing returns. They just tried
to misdirect the Trump campaign by bringing up the birther issue and got
their heads handed to them.
And now the never Trump globalist traitors from the republicans continue to
shoot themselves in the foot.just call me deplorable.

On Sep 18, 2016 1:06 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
> I agree completely, Keith. And I also think these "Never Trump" morons are
> 100% deluded if they think they won't pay for what they are doing now in 4
> or 8 years and possibly beyond.
>
> The battle lines have been drawn. Either you accept the status quo of the
> establishment/political/ruling totally disconnected career politicians from
> BOTH parties, or you don't. And there is no way in hell half of Trump
> voters will ever forget or forgive or excuse the attacks from the sore
> losers in the GOP who - even if they didn't want to support Trump - didn't
> have the common sense to shut the F up and keep it to themselves.
>
> Kasich, Cruz, ALL of the Bush family, Flake, Graham - all of them have
> absolutely ZERO chance of doing anything but whimpering and bitching and
> losing national elections in the future.
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I once
>> was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but the
>> attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.
>>
>> They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.
>>
>> More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and
>> Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has
>> shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known
>> that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!
>> That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World
>> Order" crew I can never support again.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this
>>> criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago
>>> were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were
>>> gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative”
>>> principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that
>>> Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016
>>>
>>> *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
>>> *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and
>>> McCain that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried
>>>
>>> A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican
>>> commentator (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a commentary
>>>  intended to deescalate
>>> the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh
>>> defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who decided to support the Donald
>>> as the lesser of two evils after his preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled
>>> in the primaries. Limbaugh does not hide his dislike for Trump’s
>>> free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the GOP nominee’s critics on the
>>> right may be fully justified in doubting his “genuine commitment to
>>> conservative policies.”
>>>
>>> Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also
>>> hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder, and
>>> yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our [conservative]
>>> policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is also, not
>>> incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working class
>>> constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least as
>>> well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP
>>> centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain. Moreover, it is hard
>>> not to see Trump’s focusing on the problems of illegals and sanctuary
>>> cities as anything other than a “conservative” issue. That remains the case
>>> even if most of his primary competitors and certainly the editorial board
>>> of the *Wall Street Journal* might wish those issues had never been
>>> brought into the primaries.
>>>
>>> Although Limbaugh dutifully provides the reasons that someone claiming
>>> to be on the right should vote for Trump, he still can’t resist extolling
>>> the never-Trumpers. (Although they’re not my buddies, they may be his.)
>>> These supposedly principled conservatives deeply believe that “the best
>>>

Re: Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.

I believe that it's a concerted effort to attempt to hide these attacks
PerpThe Establishment Media are now hat and hand with the Open
Borders/Globalist crew, and will gladly brand a terrorist attack or any
Muslim affiliated crime as, "Work Place Violence" or mental incompetency.



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
> Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a
> lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman
> who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag
> stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.
>
> I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week, but
> can't recall where it was.
>
> I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease in
> terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of the
> above happens within a few days.
>
> Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected
> and the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and
> terrorist sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow
> upon them.
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers

"Spot On" Perp, and like I said,  (like you!)  I will never ever support
another "Globalist/Elitist/Rockefellerian/Establishment"
politician ever again.No matter what political affiliation or letter
that they have behind their name!



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:06 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
politicalforum@googlegroups.com> wrote:

>
> I agree completely, Keith. And I also think these "Never Trump" morons are
> 100% deluded if they think they won't pay for what they are doing now in 4
> or 8 years and possibly beyond.
>
> The battle lines have been drawn. Either you accept the status quo of the
> establishment/political/ruling totally disconnected career politicians from
> BOTH parties, or you don't. And there is no way in hell half of Trump
> voters will ever forget or forgive or excuse the attacks from the sore
> losers in the GOP who - even if they didn't want to support Trump - didn't
> have the common sense to shut the F up and keep it to themselves.
>
> Kasich, Cruz, ALL of the Bush family, Flake, Graham - all of them have
> absolutely ZERO chance of doing anything but whimpering and bitching and
> losing national elections in the future.
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I once
>> was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but the
>> attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.
>>
>> They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.
>>
>> More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and
>> Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has
>> shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known
>> that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!
>> That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World
>> Order" crew I can never support again.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this
>>> criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago
>>> were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were
>>> gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative”
>>> principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that
>>> Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016
>>>
>>> *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
>>> *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and
>>> McCain that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried
>>>
>>> A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican
>>> commentator (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a commentary
>>>  intended to deescalate
>>> the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh
>>> defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who decided to support the Donald
>>> as the lesser of two evils after his preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled
>>> in the primaries. Limbaugh does not hide his dislike for Trump’s
>>> free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the GOP nominee’s critics on the
>>> right may be fully justified in doubting his “genuine commitment to
>>> conservative policies.”
>>>
>>> Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also
>>> hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder, and
>>> yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our [conservative]
>>> policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is also, not
>>> incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working class
>>> constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least as
>>> well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP
>>> centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain. Moreover, it is hard
>>> not to see Trump’s focusing on the problems of illegals and sanctuary
>>> cities as anything other than a “conservative” issue. That remains the case
>>> even if most of his primary competitors and certainly the editorial board
>>> of the *Wall Street Journal* might wish those issues had never been
>>> brought into the primaries.
>>>
>>> Although Limbaugh dutifully provides the reasons that someone claiming
>>> to be on the right should vote for Trump, he still can’t resist extolling
>>> the never-Trumpers. (Although they’re not my buddies, they may be his.)
>>> These supposedly principled conservatives deeply believe that “the best
>>> chance of saving the nation in the long run is to avoid elevating Trump to
>>> president and leader of the party because he could forever destroy
>>> conservatism and the Republican brand.” Although Limbaugh concedes that
>>> some establishment Republicans may be found among these noble idealists,
>>> most of the never-Trumpers “shared our

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers


I agree completely, Keith. And I also think these "Never Trump" morons are 
100% deluded if they think they won't pay for what they are doing now in 4 
or 8 years and possibly beyond.

The battle lines have been drawn. Either you accept the status quo of the 
establishment/political/ruling totally disconnected career politicians from 
BOTH parties, or you don't. And there is no way in hell half of Trump 
voters will ever forget or forgive or excuse the attacks from the sore 
losers in the GOP who - even if they didn't want to support Trump - didn't 
have the common sense to shut the F up and keep it to themselves.

Kasich, Cruz, ALL of the Bush family, Flake, Graham - all of them have 
absolutely ZERO chance of doing anything but whimpering and bitching and 
losing national elections in the future.

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 at 11:07:47 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>
> Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I once 
> was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but the 
> attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.  
>
> They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.  
>
> More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and 
> Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has 
> shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known 
> that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!  
> That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World Order" 
> crew I can never support again.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this 
>> criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago 
>> were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were 
>> gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative” 
>> principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that 
>> Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016
>>
>> *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
>> *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and McCain 
>> that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried
>>
>> A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican commentator 
>> (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a commentary 
>>  intended to deescalate 
>> the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh 
>> defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who decided to support the Donald 
>> as the lesser of two evils after his preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled 
>> in the primaries. Limbaugh does not hide his dislike for Trump’s 
>> free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the GOP nominee’s critics on the 
>> right may be fully justified in doubting his “genuine commitment to 
>> conservative policies.”
>>
>> Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also 
>> hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder, and 
>> yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our [conservative] 
>> policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is also, not 
>> incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working class 
>> constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least as 
>> well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP 
>> centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain. Moreover, it is hard 
>> not to see Trump’s focusing on the problems of illegals and sanctuary 
>> cities as anything other than a “conservative” issue. That remains the case 
>> even if most of his primary competitors and certainly the editorial board 
>> of the *Wall Street Journal* might wish those issues had never been 
>> brought into the primaries.
>>
>> Although Limbaugh dutifully provides the reasons that someone claiming to 
>> be on the right should vote for Trump, he still can’t resist extolling the 
>> never-Trumpers. (Although they’re not my buddies, they may be his.)   These 
>> supposedly principled conservatives deeply believe that “the best chance of 
>> saving the nation in the long run is to avoid elevating Trump to president 
>> and leader of the party because he could forever destroy conservatism and 
>> the Republican brand.” Although Limbaugh concedes that some establishment 
>> Republicans may be found among these noble idealists, most of the 
>> never-Trumpers “shared our frustration” about where the party was headed in 
>> the hands of unprincipled operators.  Limbaugh closes his remarks with this 
>> statement: “I respect the never-Trumpers and will not presume to judge them 
>> as abandoning the nation’s best interests.”
>>
>> It is of course possible to be so principled that one refuses to settle 
>> for politicians who don’t entirely live up to one’s

Just look at all the terrorist attacks and attempted cop killings in the past week.


Multiple bombs in NY and NJ. Cop slashed with a meat cleaver in NY by a 
lunatic facing deportation. Cops and innocent civilians shot by a madman 
who hated cops in Philadelphia. Radical islamic knife-wielding nutbag 
stabbed 8 in MN. Cop-hating murderer tried to run over 3 cops in Phoenix.

I thought I'd read about another one somewhere in the South this week, but 
can't recall where it was.

I had noticed a couple of weeks ago that we'd seen a perceived decrease in 
terrorist attacks and anti-cop violence for 2-3 weeks. And then all of the 
above happens within a few days.

Personally I think this is the new normal if Hillary Clinton is elected and 
the deluded radicals like BLM and the rest of the cop-haters and terrorist 
sympathizers and defenders are given the respect democrats bestow upon them.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

How to Politically Condition a Generation



“In order to tame people into the desired
pattern, victims must be brought to a point where they have lost their
alert consciousness and mental awareness. Freedom of discussion and free
intellectual exchange hinder conditioning. Feelings of terror, feelings
of fear and hopelessness, of being alone, of standing with one’s back to
the wall, must be instilled.”
November 10, 2015
How to Politically Condition a
Generation
Some insights from The Rape of the Mind.
Devin Foley
With all of the intolerance of “offensive” speech and ideas, it’s worth
considering what could be happening. Is it all just to create a better
society or are we being coerced into a certain mindset?
Sure, what’s going on is not on the level of some of the tyrannies of the
20th century or fictions such as Clockwork Orange, nonetheless the
tactics seem eerily similar.
In The Rape of the Mind, Joost Meerloo points out that:
“…he who dictates and formulates the words and phrases we use, he who is
master of the press and radio, is master of the mind.”
And who today dictates and formulates the words and phrases we use?
Usually, those that matter originate in our universities and institutions
of higher learning. They then trickle down through society as those who
were embedded with the new words and phrases make their way through
society and eventually into positions of leadership. It is the long march
through institutions to bring about cultural and then political
change.
As more and more individuals have been imprinted with the new way of
looking at the world, the more the new thinking permeates the culture and
pushes out dissenting views:
“Such is the Pavlovian device: repeat mechanically your assumptions and
suggestions, diminish the opportunity of communicating dissent and
opposition. This is the simple formula for conditioning the masses. This
is also the actual ideal of some of our public relation
machines…”
And the goal of political conditioning?
“Political conditioning should not be confused with training or
persuasion or even indoctrination. It is more than that. It is taming. It
is taking possession of both the simplest and the most complicated
nervous patterns of man. It is the battle for the possession of the nerve
cells. It is coercion and enforced conversion. Instead of conditioning
man to an unbiased facing of reality, the seducer conditions him to
catchwords, verbal stereotypes, slogans, formulas, symbols. Pavlovian
strategy in the totalitarian sense means imprinting prescribed reflexes
on a mind that has been broken down.”
If political conditioning is the goal, how is it achieved?
“In order to tame people into the desired pattern, victims must be
brought to a point where they have lost their alert consciousness and
mental awareness. Freedom of discussion and free intellectual exchange
hinder conditioning. Feelings of terror, feelings of fear and
hopelessness, of being alone, of standing with one’s back to the wall,
must be instilled.”
That sounds a bit like speaking out against the cultural and intellectual
norms found in much of our society. Say the wrong thing in corporate
America, and you will find yourself alone and terrorized. Do you dare to
ask the tough questions in school, or do you keep quiet to protect your
grades? Who dares poke their heads up, prepared for the two-minutes of
hate that will descend upon them? And let’s not mention how and what the
media reports.
Does it worry you? Are we being tamed? 

http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/blog/how-politically-condition-generation
 




-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers

Like Gottfried,  I'm not nearly as kind or forgiving as Limbaugh. I once
was, and believed that we needed to regroup after the Convention, but the
attacks by the "#NeverTrumpers" became too intense, personal and nasty.

They've made their bed, and I want them to go and lie in it.

More importantly, the thing that Limbaugh I don't think realizes, and
Gottfried doesn't touch upon, is the proverbial light that Donald Trump has
shown on that particular faction of the Republican Party. We've all known
that they were there; we just didn't realize how despicable they were!
That whole Globalist/Elitist/Establishment/Rockefellerian/New World Order"
crew I can never support again.



On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, MJ  wrote:

>
>
> *"But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this
> criticism. Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago
> were drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were
> gilding the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative”
> principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that
> Trump has failed to express?" *September 16, 2016
>
> *DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE NEVER-TRUMPERS *
> *What exactly are the high “conservative” principles of Romney and McCain
> that Trump has failed to express? *Paul Gottfried
>
> A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican commentator
> (and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted a commentary
>  intended to deescalate
> the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the “never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh
> defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who decided to support the Donald
> as the lesser of two evils after his preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled
> in the primaries. Limbaugh does not hide his dislike for Trump’s
> free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the GOP nominee’s critics on the
> right may be fully justified in doubting his “genuine commitment to
> conservative policies.”
>
> Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also
> hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder, and
> yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our [conservative]
> policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He is also, not
> incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large working class
> constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing at least as
> well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better than his GOP
> centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain. Moreover, it is hard
> not to see Trump’s focusing on the problems of illegals and sanctuary
> cities as anything other than a “conservative” issue. That remains the case
> even if most of his primary competitors and certainly the editorial board
> of the *Wall Street Journal* might wish those issues had never been
> brought into the primaries.
>
> Although Limbaugh dutifully provides the reasons that someone claiming to
> be on the right should vote for Trump, he still can’t resist extolling the
> never-Trumpers. (Although they’re not my buddies, they may be his.)   These
> supposedly principled conservatives deeply believe that “the best chance of
> saving the nation in the long run is to avoid elevating Trump to president
> and leader of the party because he could forever destroy conservatism and
> the Republican brand.” Although Limbaugh concedes that some establishment
> Republicans may be found among these noble idealists, most of the
> never-Trumpers “shared our frustration” about where the party was headed in
> the hands of unprincipled operators.  Limbaugh closes his remarks with this
> statement: “I respect the never-Trumpers and will not presume to judge them
> as abandoning the nation’s best interests.”
>
> It is of course possible to be so principled that one refuses to settle
> for politicians who don’t entirely live up to one’s ideals. About ten years
> ago I addressed a club named for the great conservative Republican of an
> earlier era Robert A. Taft. During my interaction with members I found that
> some of them would only vote for a leader who patterned himself on the
> organization’s namesake. Although I continue to refer to myself as a “Taft
> Republican,” I thought some of the young people I spoke with held
> unrealistically high expectations.
>
> But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this criticism.
> Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago were drooling
> on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were gilding the lily
> for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative” principles that
> these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that Trump has failed to
> express? Indeed Trump has raised social issues that Romney and McCain, who
> were hailed as “conservatives” refused to even touch on the campaign trail.
> Unlike them, he has promised to appoint

The Deplorables: A Brief Historical Overview




September 17, 2016
The Deplorables: A Brief
Historical Overview
Charles Burris
One doesn’t have to be a
Frankfurt
School
Freudo-Marxian
psychiatrist or a Calvinist theologian to understand that for most people
the shaping of their ideological belief system of how they view the world
is often a non-rational psychological process propelled by unconscious,
visceral emotions.
Envious hatred
of “the other” and the will to either dominate or submit in obeisance to
authority, are deep-seeded character traits which define the
sociopolitical spectrum. The obsolete categories of “left” and
“right” have been replaced with “deviance” or “normality.”

Sociopath state rulers who recognized these unsavory facts have exploited
and manipulated the masses on their behalf. How else is one to
understand the gross, nearly endless series of striking accounts of human
barbarism and war, religious and racial genocide, intolerance, torture,
and repression, over the past five hundred years. Over one hundred
million victims were murdered by willing executioners in such regimes in
the 20th Century alone.
Such passionate ideological demonization and scapegoating began with

the witch trials in the early modern period and

the destruction of unified Christendom during the Protestant
Reformation, with angry mobs of iconoclastic vandal hordes destroying
churches and engaging in

messianic communist peasant uprisings. We may say with Hilaire Belloc
and Murray Rothbard that

after Luther came Leviathan. Beneath the Wars of Religion of the
16thand 17th centuries lay a destructive
egalitarian current,
an
insidious subterranean streamwhich continued to flow through such
savage conflicts as the Thirty Years War,

the English Civil Wars, into the 18th century and the
French Revolution.

That Revolution gave birth to the seething ideologies of modern
conservatism and socialism, as well as that of liberalism. It came to
full fruition in the Russian Revolutions of 1917.
We saw a particularly egregious example of it in the 1920’s in Weimar
Germany with the left-wing

National Socialists‘ demonization of

Kulturbolschewismus or Cultural Bolshevism of their left-wing
Communist enemies. Today, an inverted variant is rampant throughout the
world in the scourge of

Cultural Marxism or
“political
correctness.”
In the United States in the 1930s and 1940s, an

Old Right grass-roots opposition to the foreign and domestic policies
of the New Deal of FDR and the Fair Deal of Harry Truman arose. Franklin
Roosevelt and his
“
Smear Bund”

allies in British intelligence and domestic Communist circles
savagely
attacked these
individuals and groups, some select scapegoats were even tried for
sedition. The scapegoating and vilification continued through the
1950s in the Wars of McCarthyism, both of its “rightwing populist” and
“
establishment liberal and conservative” variants, directed by
intelligence apparats. It has further progressed through the divisive
Vietnam conflict; into the vast ideological desert of the Reagan years;

through Hillary’s “vast right wing conspiracy” against her husband, Slick
Willie; the Hobbesian War of All Against All following 9/11; 
until today it is resurrected with

the Hillary Clinton campaign demonization of the alt-right and the
Deplorables.





-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Hillarys Partner in Government




September 17, 2016
Hillary’s “Partner in
Government”
By Thomas DiLorenzo
As a U.S. senator, Hillary Clinton helped arrange for $1.65 billion in
low-interest, federally guaranteed “Liberty Bonds” (supposedly earmarked
for post-9/11 rebuilding in New York City) to subsidize the construction
of Goldman Sachs’ gleaming new headquarters building in Lower
Manhattan.  During the 2005 groundbreaking ceremony for the project,
she affectionately called the firm her “partner in government.” 
Three years later she supported the $10 billion Federal Reserve bailout
of her too-big-to-jail “partner.”  In return, Goldman paid her at
least $675,000 for three speeches; has donated huge sums to her campaign;
and recently prohibited its employees from donating anything to
the Trump campaign.  Her son-in-law was handed a hedge fund to
manage by the CEO of Goldman Sachs (and reportedly lost 90% of the fund’s
value).
So it was no surprise that Hillary feigned great offense at Donald
Trump’s recent criticism of the Federal Reserve Board’s policy of “easy
money” that pushes interest rates close to zero.  “You should not be
commenting on Fed actions when you are either running for president or
you are president,” she indignantly declared.
Hillary Clinton apparently believes that there are four branches
of government, not three and that the fourth branch – the Sacred Fed –
should never be criticized by any of the other three.  It’s OK for
President Obama to criticize the Supreme Court during a
state-of-the-union address; and for congress and the executive branch to
engage in verbal sparring on a daily basis; but no president (let alone a
lowly congressman) should ever make a negative comment about the
Sacred Fed, according to the Hillary Doctrine.
This new Clintonian theory of American politics is yet another defense of
the corrupt system of Fed-financed crony capitalism that enriches
companies like Goldman Sachs with cheap credit and government
bailouts.  In return, the crony capitalists finance the careers and
lifestyles of fabulously wealthy politicians like the Clintons.  The
Fed is the main financing mechanism of this racket, which is why Hillary
wants to isolate it from criticism.  In her world, any criticism of
the Sacred Fed is, well, deplorable.
As David Stockman wrote in

The Great Deformation, “the central banking branch of the
state remains hostage to the Wall Street speculators who threaten a hissy
fit sell-off unless they are juiced again and again.  Monetary
policy has thus become an engine of reverse Robin Hood redistribution; it
[espouses] theories that punish Main Street savers [with near-zero
interest rates], workers, and businessmen while creating endless
opportunities  . . . for speculative gain in the Wall Street
casino.”
Stockman points out that in early 2008 it was not so much “the economy”
that was crashing but the stock prices of companies like Goldman Sachs.
The company was “handed $10 billion [by the Fed] to save itself from
alleged extinction. Yet it then swivelled on a dime and generated a $29
billion surplus” that funded “$16 billion in salary and bonuses” for
Goldman Sachs executives in that one year.  The Fed also purchased
more than $100 billion in basically worthless illiquid toxic assets from
Goldman Sachs.
The $180 billion bailout of the insurance company AIG was “all about
protecting short-term earnings and current-year executive and trader
bonuses” as well, since 90% of the company’s assets were solvent, writes
Stockman.  (Goldman Sachs also had $18 billion in claims against
AIG, which it was able to collect thanks to the bailout).
Contrary to Hillary Clinton’s “Never Question the Fed” theory, presidents
and members of Congress have always commented on Fed policy as a
matter of course.  In a 1978 article in the academic Journal of
Monetary Economics, economist Robert Weintraub explained how a long
line of presidents influenced Fed policy with their public
statements.  When President Eisenhower feared inflation and
expressed a wish for slower monetary growth, the Fed complied with the
slowest monetary growth in a decade. President Kennedy then advocated
more rapid monetary growth and the Fed accommodated him as well.
President Johnson wanted even more rapid monetary growth to  finance
his expansion of the welfare state and the Vietnam War, and the Fed
complied by more than doubling the rate of growth of the money
supply.  President Nixon’s reelection was all but assured by the
actions of the Fed, which grew the money supply in 1972 faster than in
any other year since the end of World War II.  When Nixon’s
successor, President Ford, campaigned against inflation the Fed got the
hint and slowed monetary growth, only to rev it up again when President
Carter expressed a wish for faster growth.
What all of this means is that the Fed is an engine of political
corruption and economicinstability.  It has generated
inflation rather than controlling it (the dollar is worth less than 5% of
its value in

David Limbaugh and Extolling the Never-Trumpers



"But in the case of the
never-Trumpers, I would never make this criticism. Here we are dealing
mostly with GOP shills who four years ago were drooling on cue over Mitt
Romney and who four years earlier were gilding the lily for John McCain.
What exactly were the high “conservative” principles that these
candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that Trump has failed to
express?"
September 16, 2016
DAVID LIMBAUGH AND EXTOLLING THE
NEVER-TRUMPERS
What exactly are the high “conservative”
principles of Romney and McCain that Trump has failed to express?
Paul Gottfried
A few days ago David Limbaugh, a widely-syndicated Republican commentator
(and Rush’s less fiery younger brother) posted
a commentary
intended to deescalate the tensions between Trump’s supporters and the
“never-Trumpers.” Limbaugh defines himself as a “reluctant Trumper,” who
decided to support the Donald as the lesser of two evils after his
preferred candidate Ted Cruz stumbled in the primaries. Limbaugh does not
hide his dislike for Trump’s free-wheeling rhetoric and believes that the
GOP nominee’s critics on the right may be fully justified in doubting his
“genuine commitment to conservative policies.”
Despite these doubts, Limbaugh endorses Trump for reasons that one also
hears from Sean Hannity, Pat Buchanan, Jerry Falwell, Jr., Larry Elder,
and yours truly. Trump has “many incentives to implement our
[conservative] policies,” while Hillary Clinton has absolutely none. He
is also, not incidentally, bestowing on the Republican Party a large
working class constituency; and even among racial minorities, he is doing
at least as well, and in the case of prospective black voters, better
than his GOP centrist predecessors, Mitt Romney and John McCain.
Moreover, it is hard not to see Trump’s focusing on the problems of
illegals and sanctuary cities as anything other than a “conservative”
issue. That remains the case even if most of his primary competitors and
certainly the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal might
wish those issues had never been brought into the primaries.
Although Limbaugh dutifully provides the reasons that someone claiming to
be on the right should vote for Trump, he still can’t resist extolling
the never-Trumpers. (Although they’re not my buddies, they may be
his.)   These supposedly principled conservatives deeply
believe that “the best chance of saving the nation in the long run is to
avoid elevating Trump to president and leader of the party because he
could forever destroy conservatism and the Republican brand.” Although
Limbaugh concedes that some establishment Republicans may be found among
these noble idealists, most of the never-Trumpers “shared our
frustration” about where the party was headed in the hands of
unprincipled operators.  Limbaugh closes his remarks with this
statement: “I respect the never-Trumpers and will not presume to judge
them as abandoning the nation’s best interests.”
It is of course possible to be so principled that one refuses to settle
for politicians who don’t entirely live up to one’s ideals. About ten
years ago I addressed a club named for the great conservative Republican
of an earlier era Robert A. Taft. During my interaction with members I
found that some of them would only vote for a leader who patterned
himself on the organization’s namesake. Although I continue to refer to
myself as a “Taft Republican,” I thought some of the young people I spoke
with held unrealistically high expectations.
But in the case of the never-Trumpers, I would never make this criticism.
Here we are dealing mostly with GOP shills who four years ago were
drooling on cue over Mitt Romney and who four years earlier were gilding
the lily for John McCain. What exactly were the high “conservative”
principles that these candidates of the never-Trumpers articulated that
Trump has failed to express? Indeed Trump has raised social issues that
Romney and McCain, who were hailed as “conservatives” refused to even
touch on the campaign trail. Unlike them, he has promised to appoint
“conservatives” to federal judgeships and to protect the religious
liberty of devout Christians, who have been beaten from pillar to post by
Obama and who are not likely to be treated any better under a Clinton
presidency.
Although one may be justified in questioning the genuineness of Trump’s
commitment to certain conservative principles (and right now I am
troubled by his support of a six-week maternity leave proposal that would
inflict unfair costs on employers), it is doubtful whether the
never-Trumpers are all inspired idealists. Roughly the people Limbaugh is
referring to can be divided into two types: establishment Republican
propagandists and neoconservative partisans and dependents. The two types
often merge (as with Bret Stephens, Rich Lowry, Bill Kristol and Jonah
Goldberg); in other cases (e.g., Katie Pavlich, Cal Thomas, Bill
Murchison, and Eric Erickson), we’re talking about GOP
establishmentarians who became

Trump is the Symptom, Clinton is the Disease




September 16, 2016 
Trump is the Symptom, Clinton is
the Disease
by Roger Harris 
I asked you who is the lesser evil when even the Washington Post
posits Hillary Clinton to the
“
political right” of Trump on international issues?
And you responded: “So I guess I should vote for Trump?”
Gimme Shelter: Fleeing Trump to the Democrat’s Big Tent
You are right that there are differences between the Democratic and
Republican presidential candidates. No one recognizes that better than
the ruling elites who are tripping over each other to join the Clinton
bandwagon.
Mainstream Republicans, such as Romney and the Bush bunch, are
gravitating in droves to the better Republican who happens to be a
nominal Democrat. To the right of them, practically the entirety of the

neo-conservative establishment is converting to born-again
Hillaryistas.
Charles and David, the ultra-libertarian

Koch brothers and Republican Party kingpins, have rejected Trump,
cutting him off from a major source of funding. Another billionaire
politico and sometimes Republican,

Michael Bloomberg gave Clinton his endorsement at the Democratic
National Convention.
Refugees fleeing the land of the GOP are finding succor in Clinton’s big
tent. Clinton’s New Democrats are

actively courting the conservatives being pushed out of the GOP by
the embarrassing Mr. Trump.
The ruling elites are practically

unanimously opposed to Trump for two reasons: he’s unreliable and he
is not a good snake oil salesman for their cause. Those of us to the left
of Attila the Hun also oppose Trump, but not for the same reasons. See,
for instance, Peace and Freedom Party presidential candidate

Gloria La Riva’s description of Trump as a “disgusting bigot, the
embodiment of the worst excesses of the capitalist system.”
First, the ruling elites find Trump untrustworthy to carry their water.
Maybe Trump will come around on “free trade” issues or maybe he won’t.
But with Clinton they have a proven

faithful servant.
Back in 2008, when Wall Street demanded a bailout with no strings
attached, mainstream Republican President Bush devotedly accommodated the
banksters as did Democratic presidential candidate Obama. But Republican
presidential candidate McCain thought that some conditions should be put
on this gift of free money from the American tax payers.
That is when former CEO of Goldman Sachs and

architect of the bailout, Hank Paulson – incidentally serving as
Bush’s treasure secretary – blackmailed McCain to either genuflect to
Wall Street, or Paulson would come out publically for Obama. Wall Street
got the bailout and later trillions of dollars more under

Obama’s “quantitative easing.” The financial elite migrated en
masse to the new Democrats.
That migration continues with Hillary Clinton,

Wall Street’s anointed retainer. Unlike in the past when the big
financial interests hedged their bets by contributing to both Democrats
and Republicans, the

smart money is going to the donkey party in 2016.
Second,

Wall Street understands that not only will Clinton be more compliant,
but she will also be better at legitimizing their class rule. Trump with
his open chauvinism and nativism would be too obvious and could provoke a
greater resistance to the neoliberal project. It’s not that the ruling
elites are squeamish about racism and imperialism, but they are adverse
about making it so plainly obvious.
Sympathy for the Devil: Voting for Clinton
Absent the few Bernie-or-busters, the net result of the Sanders
candidacy has been to deliver a new generation of voters into the
Democratic Party. A Pew poll predicts 90 percent of unwavering

Sanders supporters plan to vote for Clinton in November. There they
join the great majority of

African American voters as a captured constituency to be flagrantly
ignored by Clinton.
Given the logic of the lesser-of-two-evils voting, these citizens have no
recourse but to suck it up as Clinton rushes to the right to woo the
remnants of the Republican Party.

Gallup polls reports Republicans want leaders who stick to their
beliefs, while Democrats more readily accept compromise.
December’s Children: Opposing Neoliberalism by Voting for It
The lesser-of-two-evils defense dictates that we vote for Clinton –
despite all her admittedly
bad stuff – for
fear that a Trump presidency would dismantle public health care, attack
the unions, and stack the Supreme Court to the right. This argument fails
on two counts: it perpetuates a drift to the right with no prospect of
reversal and it creates the conditions for an even more noxious
phenomenon than Trump come 2020.
On the first count, you say that you’ll hold your nose and vote for
Clinton in November and then in December you’ll lobby against her. But
Clinton isn’t stupid. As long as she knows that lesser-of-two-evils
adherents will still vote for her, she’ll continue feinting to the left
and moving to the right. Unions will still be targeted, because Clinton
knows Wall Street will abandon her if she doesn’t

Fwd: [grendelreport] Earthquake...2017

-- Forwarded message --
From: Travis 
Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:22 AM
Subject: Fwd: [grendelreport] Earthquake...2017
To:

A big earthquake of 8.1 on the Richter scale hits the Middle East.

Two million Muslims die and over a million are injured.

Iraq, Iran and Syria are totally ruined and the governments ask for help to
rebuild.

The rest of the world is in shock!

Britain is sending troops to help keep the peace.
Saudi Arabia is sending oil & monetary assistance

Latin American countries are sending clothing

New Zealand and Australia are sending sheep, cattle and food crops

The Asian countries are sending labor to assist in rebuilding the
infrastructure

Canada is sending medical teams and supplies

The new American President, Donald Trump, not to be outdone, is sending two
million replacement Muslims.

"God Bless President Trump."

--
[image: Avast logo] 

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com 

__._,_.___
--
Posted by: "Beowulf" 
--

Visit Your Group

[image: Yahoo! Groups]

• Privacy  •
Unsubscribe 
• Terms of Use 

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Fwd: [grendelreport] Hillary Clinton: Basket Case

http://www.rightsidenews.com/editorial/rsn-pick-of-the-day/h
illary-clinton-basket-case/


Hillary Clinton: Basket Case

Posted on: *September 17, 2016*

Save

Save

Save
[image:
Description: Deplorable Hillary Clinton]Who really belongs in the basket of
deplorables?

Michael Cutler | FrontPage Mag 

On September 10, 2016 Fox News reported, “Clinton: Half Of Trump Supporters
‘Basket Of Deplorables’ — ‘Racist, Sexist…You Name It.’

”

This is the same Hillary Clinton whose campaign slogan, “Stronger Together”
clearly does not include Americans who support Donald Trump and the
effective enforcement of our immigration laws.

[image: Description: Quantcast]

My recent article “Balkanized America: Politicians, pollsters, and pundits
are all responsible for the nation’s division
” addressed the way
that Americans are being turned against each other by flawed polls and the
disgusting notion that voters’ desires are determined by their race,
religion or ethnicity.

This is the parallel universe of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and their
immigration anarchist cohorts wherein “Latino voters” supposedly oppose
border security and effective immigration law enforcement.

To suggest that the conduct, goals and aspirations of Americans can be
predicted solely by their race is, by definition, a blatant example of
racism.  This constitutes a vile form of profiling that would never be and
should never be tolerated if done by law enforcement officers.

Furthermore, Hillary labels anyone who wants our borders secured and
immigration laws enforced as xenophobic and racist, blithely ignoring the
irrefutable fact that our immigration laws are utterly and completely blind
as to race, religion and ethnicity.

America’s immigration laws were enacted to protect public health, national
security, public safety and the jobs of American workers.

While Clinton brands as “racists’ those who understand the truth that our
nation’s borders and immigration laws are our first line and last line of
defense against international terrorists and transnational criminals and
who therefore want our borders secured and our immigration laws enforced,
in reality, *she* is actually the racist.

Furthermore, Americans who want our immigration laws enforced are not
“anti-immigrant” as Hillary would have Americans believe, but are simply
“pro-enforcement.”  To be pro-enforcement is to be “pro-immigrant.”  Under
our immigration laws, the United States admits annually roughly one million
lawful immigrants.  The number of new immigrants the United States admits
each year is greater than the number of new immigrants admitted by all of
the other countries of the world *combined*.

These immigrants are immediately placed on the pathway to United States
citizenship and are issued Alien Registration Receipt Cards (Green Cards)
to signify their immigration status.

Under our immigration laws hundreds of thousands of lawful immigrants each
year acquire United States citizenship via the naturalization process.

It defies reason to deem those who support the immigration laws under which
one million aliens legally immigrate to America annually as
“anti-immigrant.”

Hillary Clinton has used false assertions about the necessity of securing
America’s borders and effectively enforcing our immigration laws to attack
Donald Trump and those who agree with him about the immigration crisis.

In reality, failures of the Obama administration, and those that preceded
it, to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws have facilitated
terror attacks, enabled members of ethnic criminal gangs to flood
neighborhoods across America and flooded communities with heroin and other
illegal drugs.

Those ethnic immigrant gangs pose a threat to everyone but they pose the
greatest threat to the safety and well-being of the residents of those
ethnic immigrant communities where these aliens ply their violent trades.
This is true for all such communities

Fwd: [grendelreport] Tens of Thousands of Files from Clinton, Blumenthal Computers Available on Deep Web

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/09/16/sources-tens-of-thou
sands-of-files-from-clinton-blumenthal-computers-available
-on-deep-web/?singlepage=true
Tens of Thousands of Files from Clinton, Blumenthal Computers Available on
Deep Web

Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks to the reporters at United Nations
headquarters, Tuesday, March 10, 2015. Clinton conceded Tuesday that she
should have used a government email to conduct business as secretary of
state, saying her decision was simply a matter of "convenience." (AP
Photo/Seth Wenig)

*Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks to the reporters at United Nations
headquarters, Tuesday, March 10, 2015. Clinton conceded Tuesday that she
should have used a government email to conduct business as secretary of
state, saying her decision was simply a matter of "convenience." (AP
Photo/Seth Wenig)*

PJ Media has learned from multiple sources that the House and Senate
Intelligence Committees may have access to the contents of an Eastern
European computer, potentially Russian, and that hackers may have
exfiltrated Hillary Clinton's and Sidney Blumenthal's unsecured files by
first hacking Marcel Lazar Lehel aka Guccifer.

One or more American whistleblowers recently informed the Intelligence
Committees that the files taken by the unknown hackers are available at
specific locations in the Deep Web.

A congressional source who is familiar with the information says these
documents are being called for now "the Russian files."  Getting them did
not involve hacking Russians or anyone else, but rather locating the images
that the files left behind while the unknown hackers moved them through the
Deep Web.  When Clinton associates thought they were deleting her files,
they may not have realized that files leave images even in the Deep Web
when moved by hackers.

A preliminary review of the files indicated that they contain unclassified
as well as potentially classified information, including one document
relating to Benghazi that probably should have been highly classified and
comes from one of Hillary Clinton's private computers.

Congress has learned that the FBI knew about the foreign exfiltration of
that document from Clinton's server weeks before Director James Comey
announced his decision not to recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton for
her use of private email.  Comey testified to Congress that Guccifer denied
hacking Clinton and that Clinton was "probably" hacked, but did not allude
to having received any information that she was hacked.

"With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not
find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton's personal e-mail domain in its
various configuration since 2009 was hacked successfully. But given the
nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess we
would be unlikely to see such direct evidence," said Comey.

A congressional source who has met with a whistleblower commented that
"even a Hillary supporter should want the public to know what foreigners
took from her private servers, especially if it is damaging to her.
Otherwise the candidate could be blackmailed by a foreign power."

Developing...





--
[image: Avast logo] 

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com 



__._,_.___
--
Posted by: "Beowulf" 
--


Visit Your Group



[image: Yahoo! Groups]

• Privacy  •
Unsubscribe 
• Terms of Use 

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Fwd: [grendelreport] Watch the mainstream media adopt the Democrats talking points.

Mind-numbed robots come to mind.

Or even better ...

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k
*

==

Watch the mainstream media adopt the Democrats talking points.

Sep 12, 2016


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E96lAHygeIU




--
[image: Avast logo] 

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com 



__._,_.___
--
Posted by: "Beowulf" 
--


Visit Your Group



[image: Yahoo! Groups]

• Privacy  •
Unsubscribe 
• Terms of Use 

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Fwd: [grendelreport] Muslims are most disliked group in US