Perhaps pick up the discussion (if further discussion is needed) in
your cross-posted thread in spinoffs
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs/browse_thread/thread/7180c33718757180/3834d5597f575299#3834d5597f575299
On Mar 6, 8:24 pm, louis w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, did
about the script parsing, well, it's easy enough
to find out. Disable all of the script stuff but leave the script in,
get some timings, then remove the link to the script. :)
Hope this helps,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Mar 9, 9:53 am, Thierry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
...even though you haven't found any...
s/you/the author
(needed more coffee before posting)
-- T.J. ;-)
On Mar 24, 11:36 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an interesting implementation; would need some cleanup, IMHO.
The things I see off-hand are:
1. window
(I've never tried, you may well run into security
provisions), but if you did you'd need to use the document in the
other frame rather than the window...
Hope this helps,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Apr 26, 12:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i try to observe
Sébastien,
(Have you given up tennis in favor of software development?)
What would this offer over using Element.addClassName -- e.g., over
using the browser's own style handling?
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On May 21, 2:15 pm, Sébastien Grosjean - ZenCocoon
[EMAIL PROTECTED
length = this.length;
if (i 0) i = length + i;
for (; i length; i++)
if (this[i] === item) return i;
return -1;
};
So I'll file a ticket, my only question is whether I should file it
against the code or the docs. ;-)
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Jun 6, 12:51 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish it was that easy : ) Unfortunately, we can't really account for
all host objects, which are notorious for their incompliance with
specs (e.g. it's well known how some of them have no constructor
documentation was updated : /
- kangax
On Jun 6, 8:34 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gah! Sorry, I should have looked.
FWIW, have to disagree with the low/minor categorization. It's not
just that it doesn't say, it's that it explicitly does say the wrong
thing... Are the docs
no call for
this (yet). Committers, please correct me if I'm wrong there.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Jun 6, 2:38 pm, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/6/6 T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah, Richard's approach would be about eight times more elegant
Ah, yes, now that Prototype is using Git, things like this are a lot
easier...
-- T.J. :-)
On Jun 6, 8:51 pm, Andrew Dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 6, 9:13 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm really excited by the pdoc effort. (I can't say I like the
syntax
@All: He's already reposted this to the prototype forum, so you can
ignore it here.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Jun 16, 6:22 pm, krichnaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Ajax.Request call
[snip]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Jun 17, 8:46 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just Prototype Scriptaculous?
Just to differentiate from Core.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
-but-
probably-appropriate Prototype Scriptaculous with a group comment
giving each URL.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group
environment doesn't
provide it (such as the new Array stuff), obviously we wouldn't prefix
that as the whole point is to not worry about whether the host
environment provides the function.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 18, 4:27 pm, John-David Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
,
for instance _:
* * * *
var wel;
wel = $('mydiv');
if (wel._.childNodes.length == 0)
{
wel.update('p class=noteNo content/p);
}
* * * *
...but that gets pretty cryptic pretty quickly. Mind you, the code
does look a bit like it's smiling at us. ;-)
All told, I think raw makes good sense.
--
T.J
');
list = items.source;
for (n = 0; n list.length; ++n)
{
list[n].update('This is item ' + n);
}
...because although I'm accessing the raw list, it contains wrapped
nodes. Is that the idea?
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 21, 6:37 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED
items are part of its indexed properties.
If it's not literally a wrapper, if it's a replacement, that's great
and it's certainly the simplest solution. But we keep calling it a
wrapper, which is the only reason for the question about indexed
access.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software /
On Aug
continue its recursive descent even after it has what you
want, and then it goes and puts a list around it, all to be thrown
away because you're just going to use the first element anyway.
FWIW.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 21, 3:45 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 21, 9:21 am, T.J. Crowder
This made me think about lazy initialization of NodeListWrapper's. The
two options seem to be:
1) store an array of pure elements and turn them into wrappers on
the fly
2) turn elements into wrappers when instantiating `NodeListWrapper`
and then return these (already prepared) wrappers.
extended
until/unless I actually use them). If I use $$W(), I'll get the new
Prototype.NodeList with all of the elements pre-wrapped. Is that the
idea going forward?
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 22, 1:15 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 7:14 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This made
When iterating over a `source` items, we don't know if an item is a
wrapper or an element.
My _each implementation deals with that case pretty efficiently. The
ongoing runtime cost of item() and _each() is pretty much one extra
comparison.
Before we can do benchmarks, we should ask people
@JDD: Sorry, missed your note in the melee.
T.J. $$W and $$ are the same thing (just named $$W so that we know we
are talking about the new implementation).
Depending on how $$W is implemented, I may pretty strongly want
Prototype's excellent selectors but without automatic element
wrapping.
. :-)
On Aug 22, 9:56 pm, Ken Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kangax wrote:
On Aug 22, 11:30 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure if we should pre-wrap elements or do the lazy init.
First approach hits the memory consumption, while second - run-time
performance. We'll need
;
// ...
myNiftyFilter = createFilter(Object.isString, function(x) {
alert(Filter: + x);
});
// ...
a = [1, two, 3, 4, five];
a.each(myNiftyFilter);
// Alerts Filter: two and then Filter: five
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Sep 12, 10:03 am, Josi [EMAIL
to submit a
bug, or how to compile prototype. So if you want you can submit this
yourself ...
...which is seriously uncool, so I called you on it.
Move along, nothing to see here.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Sep 23, 1:16 am, Valentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't hijacked
Karl,
Use of $break is not deprecated. Use of $continue is deprecated (just
use a return statement). But if you want to break the loop, you still
throw $break:
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/enumerable/each
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 4, 8:43 am, kstubs [EMAIL PROTECTED
had to issue one
blind like that, but it just returns without doing anything if it
doesn't find an observer to drop.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 5, 1:00 am, kstubs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, just keep track of them with a typical variable?
var myElementIsObserved = false
the
delay function on the function object. It could be written in two
steps for clarity:
var f = function() { obj.hide() };
f.delay(WaitObj.wait);
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 17, 8:26 am, kstubs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the site! (throwing that out there before
that using wrappers rather than extending native
prototypes is on the cards, and inline documentation, both of which
(IMHO) are very good moves. What else?
Plans can change, of course, but the absense of a plan leads to
meandering
Thanks,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
an idea what the plans were.
Dates would be nice, but with this kind of project, I don't know how
realistic having dates on milestones is.
-- T.J. :-)
On Oct 24, 12:32 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 5:12 pm, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Now that 1.6.0.3
Hi,
SORRY, I know that its a CORE forum but I can't find any 'users group'
or 'user forum', so posting here.
Really? There's a link to it on the Prototype website's discuss
page.
Here:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct
]).
Seems like that would be fairly clear. Strikeout is still fairly
readable, but it makes the point of something having been removed.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi folks,
Thanks for the input. I'll go with [deprecated], and with
strikethrough if the end result looks good, as that's a pretty common
use of strikethrough in dev communities. If people don't like the end
result, feel free to raise a new ticket. :-)
Thanks,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder
.);
}
}
});
new Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater(target, url, options);
}
(Untested)
I bet there's a cleaner solution, though.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 27, 5:06 pm, DNS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a PeriodicalUpdater that refreshes the contents of a div
Sorry, just realized what group this message is in. Probably better
to post over in the user's discussion group:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
This group is for discussions of Prototype core development only.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 27, 5:06
are!
Yeah, that was a big part of what drew me to Prototype, too.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 27, 5:25 pm, DNS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll just check the status for now and wait for 1.6.1. By the way,
I've been using Prototype for a while, and this is the first time I've
opacity (and float).
[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/api/element/setStyle
If there's still a problem with the latest, would you file a bug
report (and even better, a patch!):
http://www.prototypejs.org/contribute
Thanks again,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 27, 5:58 pm, Gusmão
Hi,
The docs say All callbacks in the life-cycle are available.[1] Have
you tried registering an onFailure and it hasn't worked even though
the request's own onFailure was called?
[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/api/ajax/responders
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 29
which elements within the
element being replaced are being watched, you might look at event
delegation instead, which involves fewer handlers placed at a higher
(e.g., container) level.
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 30, 7:57 am, Yee Keat Phuah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Looks like Firefox already has it:
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/DOM_Events
Googling DOMNodeRemovedFromDocument site:microsoft.com brings no
joy, however. :-)
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 30, 9:02 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
FWIW, I don't think
may
differ. :-)
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Oct 30, 9:41 am, Yee Keat Phuah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:02 PM, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I don't think this is a bug in Prototype. Prototype keeps track
of the event handlers
and clears observers from it
and all of its descendants, like the OP's select(*) or ideally
something more efficient using the cache internal to prototype. Then
in situations where you know some things are hooked, you can do:
$('container').purgeObservers().update(newcontent);
--
T.J. Crowder
tj
-standard behavior not
implemented by other browsers (IE and Safari, for instance).
[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/contribute
[2] http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 8, 7:04 am, Yaffle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
var
}
...to avoid the HTML parser ending the script early.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 9, 5:33 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 6:14 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yaffle,
(Just FWIW, I sense you're not a native English speaker, so I'll just
mention
Hi,
You'll want to post to the user's group:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
This groups is for core development discussion, not end user
questions.
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 11, 10:26 am, cleriker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
i
what's going on.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
name. (ECMA spec[1], section 13.)
[1] http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 15, 7:43 am, artemy tregubenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:59:07 +0300, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only
.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 18, 5:56 am, Andrew Dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking about how we can flatten the learning curve. If you were
to teach someone how to use Prototype in 10 incremental steps, what
would they be?
I've got only nine so far, but here
at it or give me an idea where I
may have gone astray?
Thanks in advance,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
unittest_js submodules.
Let me know how things go.
Best,
Tobie
On Mar 20, 10:39 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
I don't seem to be seeing the unit test HTML files. Apologies if I've
done something daft, but I'm running out the door so I thought I'd
ping
Wes,
Please use the general Prototype script.aculo.us discussion group[1]
for general discussion; this list is for core development discussion
only.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
Thanks,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer
(Yes, I do have JavaScript allowed to do anything it wants with the
window.)
* Refuses to test against Safari 3.2.2, says it's not supported on
Windows
[1] http://prototypejs.org/download
FWIW,
-- T.J. :-)
On Mar 20, 8:59 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 20, 3:03 pm, T.J. Crowder t
Thanks in advance,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/16d0517ecc605a00/c9cfe041c1da19de
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Mar 25, 12:32 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 3:32 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, a number
wouldn't want to explain the subtle effects
of that to confused users. :-)
Again, FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Mar 29, 9:05 am, Yaffle vic99...@yandex.ru wrote:
Should I use defer method for browsers, which
, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the help. Yeah, it is weird, isn't it? :-) And yet we
have permission to delete it (apparently, as it does get deleted).
Are you logged in as an administrator?
I am indeed, and that file is being created in the temp
? I wonder if this has only been
used successfully on Windows (if even there?), Mac OS X, and the like
that don't (by default) have case-sensitive file systems...
-- T.J.
On Apr 2, 10:08 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Folks,
Can anyone build the docs other than Tobie and Andrew
from the root Prototype directory. Those sound like issues I
had run into, and fixed, several weeks ago.
Meanwhile, I'll fire up my Windows VM and see what happens when I try
to generate docs from there.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Apr 2, 6:17 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi
on Windows. I also know nothing about Ruby, but I suspect
that it does as well.
-- T.J.
On Apr 3, 1:37 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/4/3 T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com:
Hi Andrew,
T.J., are you sure you're running the latest code?
Yup, for the Ubuntu system
line on the page, I get a 404 for language
\dollara.html.
Can anyone build the docs without having that problem? I just need to
know whether it's an issue with my setup.
Thanks,
-- T.J.
On Apr 3, 10:41 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks. With the latest
Hi Richard,
For these really long listings and such, I wonder if it might be
better to use Pastie[1] rather than inlining them in messages?
(Pastie has a plain text choice.) It's just that with replies and
quoting and such, these messages get REALLY long and in some cases
they seem to freak out
Hi folks,
I fixed ticket #21 today with this commit (my branch, not core):
http://github.com/tjcrowder/prototype/commit/47d82530fe3d8751e5c95d528bf324d2fb450666
I'd appreciate it if someone would look hard at the relevant if
statement in Form.serializeElements and check that their
Cheers Allen.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 21, 7:49 pm, Allen Madsen bla...@gmail.com wrote:
I've looked it over and your description appears to be correct.
Allen Madsen
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:47 AM, T.J. Crowder
t...@crowdersoftware.comwrote:
Hi folks,
I fixed ticket #21 today
://github.com/tjcrowder/prototype/commit/29b76e7a9e9c6168d62f1d1c6da9aafb1bf5086f
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 26, 12:28 am, Samuel Lebeau samuel.leb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on a Template rewrite trying to reduce code size and
complexity.
It uses
trying to make it fit in, and make it
as cool as the idea warrants.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 26, 3:33 am, Samuel Lebeau samuel.leb...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
Callback function receives PE instance as first argument, so here
would be the self-stop mechanism
Samuel,
Sorry for the Simon error in my last post. Years ago I knew a guy
named Simon Lebeau, clearly it got ingrained my brain.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 27, 10:35 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
Funny you should be doing that, I was just looking at Template the
other
Hi Richard,
This may be a topic better discussed in the general discussion group
[1]. This group is for Prototype core development discussion.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 10:12 am, Richard Heyes richard.he
of timeframe, but we're
talking hours or days, not weeks.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 11:43 am, Richard Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi.
I've just updated my local copy of prototype from git.
All looks OK.
Rebuilt prototype.js all fine.
Run rake doc
Hi,
This group is for discussion of development of the Prototype library,
not usage of it. Please see this group[1].
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 1:01 pm, clicforw...@googlemail.com
clicforw
@Allen, Alexander, Rainer,
Again, can we please pick this up over on the appropriate group[1]?
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
Cheers,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 2:50 pm, Rainer Weber clicforw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
thanks
Hi all,
See this fairly half-baked ticket in Lighthouse for context:
https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/773
Responding to the proof-of-concept commit, Kangax asked whether * was
used for this sort of thing anywhere else, and in a private email
Tobie flagged up how this in
Hey Robert,
It's true, I was thinking in terms of deprecating PE at some
stage... :-)
Re #2: Using #bind at least doubles the call overhead, which I'm not a
fan of generally.
...have it throw $break!
Now that is a very smart idea.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Aug 27, 4:13
Exceptions aren't eaten.
Good, so a $break-like mechanism is possible then, just moved out a
level.
-- T.J.
On Aug 27, 10:49 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
*blech* to ES5's enumerable stuff not having $break or similar
functionality. I've just read the forEach section of
-scriptaculous/browse_thread/thread/e5286fee9ac18a40
Happy coding,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Aug 27, 5:36 pm, watermark86 watermar...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted this code on the support list, but now that it's working, it
seems more appropriate to put
I would expect most
class authors to use, the benefit is less but still marked.
Call overhead isn't sexy, but does anyone else think this is worth
looking at more closely?
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
@Allen @Jim,
Gets my vote.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 4, 3:05 pm, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 14:09:32 T.J. Crowder wrote:
[...] I do _not_ mean that I
think callSuper is a great name; I don't and I expect suggestions
like yours to result in a better name
, and that lead to my finding wild differences in a very
simple operation (zero-filling an array) across implementations.
FWIW,
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1295584/most-efficient-way-to-create-a-zero-filled-javascript-array/1295671
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
of the great things about the
new mechanism is that you don't have to copy args at all if you are
willing to use the more verbose syntax.
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core/browse_thread/thread/cf8c287e231a0192#
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 4
Hi Richard,
Yeah, see the PDoc mailing list[1]. Maruku is a no-go, too. :-
( Tobie's getting very frustrated (as am I).
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/pdoc?lnk=
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 4, 4:59 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl
and sharing it 'round; I'll do that
over the weekend.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 4, 6:25 pm, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:15 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've come up with a new way of handling $super
end up endlessly recursing. Wow that's an easy trap to fall into.
No, it's either use the function's name unadorned, or use
arguments.callee and pay the performance penalty. Personally, I
prefer using the function's name. :-)
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 6, 8:48 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com
developers).
Both of those are things that have not been done enough in the past
and have held back progress, hence trying to move move toward them.
As a Prototype user, thank you again for your efforts at improving
efficiency, greatly appreciated,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
://api.prototypejg.org up and running soon.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 6, 9:35 pm, joneff jon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it just me, or the usability of the new API micro site isn't as
good as the old one?
I mean before, if I wanted to know more about Event
.
Why? (Brief) examples are a good thing in documentation!
I'm restoring most of them, adjusting some to be a little more clear,
but somebody tell me if there's some strong reason for stripping them
out.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Hi Jim,
Perhaps I would do:
var B = Class.create(A, {
nifty: function(){
var $super = this.nifty.$super.bind( this );
// $super refers to A.nifty() bound to this
$super();
}
});
[1] Please correct if this is wrong!
You need to leave out the this. and use a named
Hi,
It really looks nicer :)
Thanks!
I haven't run it but I guest it is possible to do
this.method.$super.call(this, ...)
No, you need to drop the this. from the beginning of that. See my
reply to Allen a couple up (or the PDoc comments here[1]) for why.
Quadling rquadl...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/9/8 T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com:
Hi,
It really looks nicer :)
Thanks!
I haven't run it but I guest it is possible to do
this.method.$super.call(this, ...)
No, you need to drop the this. from the beginning of that. See my
my stuff into it:
git pull tjcrowder supercalls
5. Build
rake dist
6. Profit!
Alternately, here's[1] a pre-baked copy for anyone who just wants to
grab it and play around, but of course it will go stale fairly
quickly.
[1] http://gist.github.com/182838
-- T.J.
On Sep 8, 1:15 pm, T.J
use frequently.
Kudos, T.J.
-joe t.
On Sep 7, 6:54 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you know, I'm running through all of our old docs and
merging them into the PDoc comments in the source, and I've run into a
really common theme: Where methods
@Allen,
For your two suggested additions. I don't think I have ever had a use for
either.
Thanks.
One thing I would like to suggest though is that Class.create
take an object or a function as an argument.
I _really_ like that idea, not least because it seems to me that by
reducing the
() { ... }
function keen() { ... }
// Export public methods
return {nifty: nifty, spiffy: spiffy, keen: keen};
});
...while still accepting the form where we've already been given an
object.
Nice one!
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
for jumping into this,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 8, 4:11 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I still have some serious reservations about this patch.
Before I dive into details, though, can someone please tell me why
we're not looking at Dean
and bound functions, though, and
I'm glad to hear that will be finding its way into 1.6.1.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 8, 7:43 pm, Robert Kieffer bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 8:44 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
arguments.callee.$super.call(this, arg
Hi all,
I thought of a wrinkle today: Mixins. This new mechanism modifies
function instances if they override base class functions (it leaves
them alone if they don't). So if you mix in something that has a
function with the same name as a parent class's function, we will set
a $super
Hi Allen,
Thanks. I agree, it's a very edgy edge case. :-)
(wouldn't the current let you do this as well?)
Actually, it works in the current implementation, because if a mixin
function uses $super (which again is a bit odd), addMethods wraps it
up in a closure and never modifies the actual
Hi Robert,
That's a very interesting use case, thanks for that. I can certainly
see the utility of that, and in fact as I was writing all of this up
for my (pathetic little) blog I was getting increasingly uncomfortable
with the mixin issue.
If it's important for mixins to participate in
Hi Ngan,
This question is probably more appropriate for the user's group[1],
rather than the core development group. If you'll repost over there,
there are a couple of things to point out in that stuff...
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder
it as not worthwhile). I'm not aware of any plans to do
so. I suspect you'd be better off (from a performance standpoint)
building toString / fromString support into your keys.
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Sep 10, 7:07 pm, James Aimonetti james.aimone...@gmail.com
). I will just make this function exists in IE6
7, but not 8 for now, unless someone can tell me what exactly is
causing this.
If someone wants to, I can still attach a simple test for this.
On Sep 10, 4:07 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Viktor,
Could you put
@Samuel:
I've been working on this too and had quite reasonable performance
I like it, _should_ perform a *lot* better than a straight array given
a reasonable distribution of keys. This is similar to what Java's
HashMap does (not that I'm holding it up as a model of high
performance).
@Jim:
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
