Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX Tabs Widget
Victor,
Thanks for the links... I'd already seen control.tabs and it doesn't appear
to support ajax (if it does its not documented and the api makes no
reference to it).
The one on sourceforge appears to be a fork of the control.tabs and also I
do see references to ajax in the source, it has no d
> I'm now looking for/at tab controls that support ajax calls. The few that
> I've found are pretty static in that you can assign tab "A" to a specific
> AJAX request but you have no ability to dynamically create/destroy tabs.
>
LivePipe Control.Tabs: http://livepipe.net/control/tabs + somew
I managed to get Rolands tabs.js to work. Essentially I added another
parameter to the addPanel function called relationship and then used that
in the new Element(). After Roland adds the Panel (creates a new tab) he
calls openPanel which will inturn call the AJAX call back. Once there it
was eas
>
> Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in javascript code?
>>>
>> The response is already empty in web inspector.
>
Very bad
> You should check if it is actually written to HTTP response (maybe
>> response is already flushed).
>>
> If I return some HTML in addition to my
Dear Victor,
Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2012 11:47:25 UTC+2 schrieb Victor:
>
> I checked the response header and it's "
>> Content-Type:
>> text/html; charset=UTF-8".
>> Unfortunately I couldn't check the response because it's empty.
>>
>
> Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in
>
> I checked the response header and it's "
> Content-Type:
> text/html; charset=UTF-8".
> Unfortunately I couldn't check the response because it's empty.
>
Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in javascript code?
> Printing the return-part in my controller I got the correc
Additional info: when I print out the response to console I only receive:
**
So my base64-encoded string is cutted out. When calling
my reloadurl directly in the browser the image shows up correctly.
Any further suggestions to this?
regards
mabei
Am Dienstag, 14. August 2012 09:24:51 UTC+2 sc
Dear Victor,
thanks for your reply. I checked the response header and it's "
Content-Type:
text/html; charset=UTF-8".
Unfortunately I couldn't check the response because it's empty. Printing
the return-part in my controller
I got the correct base64-encoded string. I checked prototype api docs an
>
> I deliver a URL to my controller service via prototype ajax. This one is
> fetching the image and returns
> the image base64_encoded.
>
> While observing the response I noticed just an empty result.
>
How are you observing the response? Use network sniffer and/or Network pane
from Web Devel
Apologies - I did not check the Prototype reference properly.
FYI: Prototype's Ajax.Updater has an option called evalScripts that
defaults to false (i/e it does not evaluate inline
Hi,
First of all, thanks for the answer.
I think that normally, I can't have two PeriodicalUpdate at once.
Indeed, when looking at javascript console in chrome, I see that when
the call is waiting, no other XHR is beginning.
Plus, I don't know exactly how it works behind the library, but could
it
Hi,
I held off posting this earlier in case someone had something more
useful to say, but if you're using PeriodicalExecuter to fire off ajax
requests, I think you're opening yourself to some chaotic effects,
since you've got a timed event firing off an event that takes
unpredictable time (the aja
Hi !
As nobody seems to be looking or have an idea, here is the source code
of the page :
http://kraml.fr/lib/js/chat.js
It seems that when being @home with 2 computers (on an Internet box)
on the website, it "crashes" more often.
Here are my ideas of what is being happening, if it reminds some
Hi there again !
New debugs showed me that the php file wasn't even called.
I heard there could be limits on the number of concurrent ajax calls,
is it true ?
I think that to test it, I'm going to stop my periodicalupdater before
an request and restart it right after, but it seems to me a bit wei
Thank you both for the informative replies :)
However, I believe we can technically implement it now, using Comet
and "long polling".
What I'd like to do is:
1) The server is Tomcat, in my control. So I tell it not to close the
connection, just keep writing into it (using some separator to
indicat
On tiistaina 4. tammikuuta 2011 at 18.22, Phil Petree wrote:
> There was some discussion of this for html 6 then for awile it looked like
> they were gonna drop it and then it came back. Latest doc is here:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
>
> But dont expect support anytime soon...
>
>
Hi T.J. Crowder,
Now works with your suggests. Thanks a lot.
The ajax request look like doesn't work, because callback parse, it
did call another ajax request not fixed with your suggets.
Thanks.
On 11 Nov, 15:43, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:20 AM, fashionpeople wrote:
>
>
>
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:20 AM, fashionpeople wrote:
Hi T.J. Crowder,
var jsonRequest = JSON.stringify(requestObject);
new Ajax.Request(baseUrl + '/usermsg/index/sendmessage', {
method: 'POST',
requestHeaders: {Accept: 'application/json'},
parameters: {json: jsonRequest},
// ...
In
Hi T.J. Crowder,
var jsonRequest = JSON.stringify(requestObject);
new Ajax.Request(baseUrl + '/usermsg/index/sendmessage', {
method: 'POST',
requestHeaders: {Accept: 'application/json'},
parameters: {json: jsonRequest},
// ...
In PHP:
$request = $this->getRequest();
Hi,
It's T.J., not J.
> i want convert requestObject in JSON string and send to the server.
>
> var jsonRequest =
> encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(requestObject));
> new Ajax.Request(baseUrl + '/usermsg/index/sendmessage', {
> method: 'POST',
> requestHeade
J. Crowder do not get me wrong, I thank you for the effort they put in
helping others.
i readed about your suggest to send data in this simple way:
var jsonRequest = ...;
new Ajax.Request( // ...
parameters: {json: jsonRequest}
// ...
});
but my question is, i have al
It may be helping if you could trace and post here the following
things :
>From Javascript:
- requestObject
- JSON.stringify(requestObject)
>From PHP:
- $this->getRequest()->getRawBody();
- rawurldecode($this->getRequest()->getRawBody());
Also, why do you need to use JSON.stringify thing when, as
Hi,
> I tried use fixedEncodeURI like suggest in your links.
I've never even heard of fixedEncodeURI.
People are taking the time to help you here, it's worth taking the
time to carefully *read* what people have written and try the things
they suggest (or not, of course, it's up to you).
This is
I tried use fixedEncodeURI like suggest in your links.
But doesn't work.
I didn't understand the problem.
On 9 Nov, 17:25, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
>
> Well, did you try actually doing what I suggested?
>
> -- T.J.
>
> On Nov 9
Hi,
> I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
Well, did you try actually doing what I suggested?
-- T.J.
On Nov 9, 4:07 pm, fashionpeople
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
>
> function sendMessage(baseUrl, idNickRcv, msg) {
>
>
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
function sendMessage(baseUrl, idNickRcv, msg) {
var requestObject = new Object();
requestObject.idNickRcv = idNickRcv;
requestObject.msg = msg;
var jsonRequest = JSON.stringify(request
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
function sendMessage(baseUrl, idNickRcv, msg) {
var requestObject = new Object();
requestObject.idNickRcv = idNickRcv;
requestObject.msg = msg;
var jsonRequest = JSON.stringify(request
Right. The best low-level way to translate JS to PHP and back again is
using encodeURI or uncodeURIComponent on your JS side, and
rawurldecode() or rawurlencode() on the PHP side. They are
functionally identical, as long as you have set your PHP side to use
UTF-8 as its default charset.
W
Hi again,
I probably should have said that if you need to URL-encode anything on
the JavaScript side, the JavaScript functions for that are `encodeURI`
and `encodeURIComponent` (not `escape`), where the latter is the most
useful. More:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference/Global_O
Hi,
I don't know that it's the problem because I'm not a PHP person, but
you're using the `escape` function to encode your parameters, and then
decoding them with a PHP function called `urldecode`. JavaScript's
`escape` function does _not_ URL-encode things, it does something
similar but different
Same difference.
Since the AJAX calls are Async you have no control over what gets completed
first or what gets interrupted by what.
If script a does a complex query taking 2.2 seconds and returns a large data
set while script b does a simple query that takes .02 seconds and returns
100 bytes, sc
I believe I solved the problem. I had a queue of work orders. One of
these work orders queued up another work order, so it was a nested
AJAX request - BAD IDEA!
On Sep 24, 12:56 pm, JoJo wrote:
> I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
> off by B's instantiation.
>
I don't need A to finish before B. I need A's callbacks to not be cut
off by B's instantiation.
On Sep 24, 12:44 pm, Phil Petree wrote:
> If you want a() to finish before b() and b() to finish before c() then you
> will have to daisy chain in the onComplete code.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:21
T.J., I was surprised too that the DB would have time to get an update
before the page is unloaded, but I had a closer look at the
example :o)
If the links urls are downloadable file types like the ".exe" of the
example, the browser will not unload the current page, and the Ajax
request will comple
Hi,
By default, Ajax.Request is *asynchronous*. I'm surprised, frankly,
that you're seeing many database updates at all, regardless of the
browser, since a request may not have been transmitted before the page
gets torn down to make way for the new one. I wouldn't expect it to be
reliable.
If you
Your method seems really random. You should proceed differently.
Imagine the user has JS disabled, it's click won't be logged, you
should use a server side script that will log the click and redirect
the user to the desired file : href="dispatcher.php?file=program.exe"
If you don't have access to t
I did something similar in that I just patched Ajax.Request with some
extra functionality to allow timeouts, I never fussed with it further
than fundamental tests but it certainly worked. Take a peak and maybe
you can learn how to write something to meet your own needs
http://positionabsolute.net
Hi,
There's a ticket for it:
https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/302
and it's mentioned in this one:
https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/tickets/308
Looks like #302 is waiting for someone to write some tests, but: I
know that separate from Mark's stuff in #308
Hi,
I know that ncubica's actual problem has been solved via JSONP, but
just for clarity:
On Jun 24, 6:53 pm, David Behler wrote:
> Hi Nahum,
>
> as far as I know Firefox does not allow for cross-domain AJAX requests.
Firefox does indeed allow cross-domain requests, it was one of the
first brow
and the JSONP works at least for flickr... thanks for the support =)
On Jun 24, 12:53 pm, David Behler wrote:
> Hi Nahum,
>
> as far as I know Firefox does not allow for cross-domain AJAX requests.
>
> What you could to is to request a php file on your server and that php
> file does the call to
Yes thanks David, I just had read about this, and found this one for
Prototype http://www.dandean.com/jsonp-for-prototypejs/ and the js
file is in http://www.dandean.com/jsonp-for-prototypejs/src/jsonp.js
this let you make cross domain calls, (at least is what he is saying)
Im going to try in a few
Hi,
> In place of "add.php" I want to pass a url of a third party site,
> where my form elements will be submitted.
>
> such as - "http://www.aweber.com/scripts/addlead.pl";
>
> how do I pass this url to the Ajax.Updater??
In exactly the same way as "add.php". But having done that, you're
trying
Hi,
If the document the script is in came from a URL with (say) port 80,
and you issue an XHR (Ajax) call to (say) port 801 or 802, you're
initiating a cross-origin request that will (barring special handling)
fail because it violates the Same Origin Policy[1]. So why is it
working in IE8? Because
Hi,
> I never see this alert when my web host is
> overloaded and just doesn't respond at all.
Take a look at "Bulletproof Ajax Requests", it appears that for some
reason, `on0` is triggered in failed-to-connect situations:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-bulletproof-ajax-reques
does oncomplete fire?
On Mar 10, 4:31 pm, JoJo wrote:
> I noticed that the onFailure callback never fires when there's
> actually an error in Ajax.Request. Commonly, I just alert('server
> busy') in the callback. I never see this alert when my web host is
> overloaded and just doesn't respond at
Thanks very much, this seems to fix things very neatly.
Walter
On Feb 16, 2010, at 12:33 PM, gwyohm wrote:
hi walter,
this seem to be a known issue on rails trac.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8259
It only happens on file:/// protocol when native XmlHttpRequest is
used which is as a matter
hi walter,
this seem to be a known issue on rails trac.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8259
It only happens on file:/// protocol when native XmlHttpRequest is
used which is as a matter of fact default configuration.
to work around this issue, you might want to patch your prototype.js
file in tha
Well thanks for the help on posting a request to the iframe to handle
the PDF. Here is my bigger problem and the reason for my original
thought: how do you trigger code on completion of the PDF load in the
iframe? Of course the original thought was to make an ajax request and
and write the results
Blast (I *hate* double posting), forgot to say: By "theIFrameName" in
that code I mean literally the value of a `name` attribute on the
`iframe` tag (*name*, not *id*).
-- T.J. :-)
On Feb 9, 3:05 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It must be a post to the server, not a get.
>
> Okay, that's a
Hi,
> It must be a post to the server, not a get.
Okay, that's a *few* more lines of code:
var markup, form;
markup =
"" +
"" +
"" +
"";
$(document.body).insert({bottom: markup});
form = $('___unique_form_id___');
form.submit();
form.remov
Generate a form with the necessary values in the iFrame and submit the
form. That's all I can think off right now.
On 09 Feb 2010, at 01:03, kstubs wrote:
It must be a post to the server, not a get.
On Feb 8, 4:22 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
Hi,
Is this possible?
Possible? It's downright
It must be a post to the server, not a get.
On Feb 8, 4:22 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Is this possible?
>
> Possible? It's downright easy:
>
> $('idOfIFrame').src = "pathToYourServerScript.xyz";
>
> Very important that your server script set the correct content type,
> of course.
>
Hi,
> Is this possible?
Possible? It's downright easy:
$('idOfIFrame').src = "pathToYourServerScript.xyz";
Very important that your server script set the correct content type,
of course.
I use something similar with a frame (not an iframe), but the concept
should be transferrable.
HTH,
--
Since the PDF is dynamically generated, the source is the streamed
result of the ajax request. The iframe has no way to submit a POST to
a server,but instead, can I stream to the iframe somehow, the ajax
response?
On Feb 8, 4:06 pm, Peter De Berdt wrote:
> On 08 Feb 2010, at 23:34, kstubs wrote:
Olla,
ok i found it.
You have to put the input for username before the passwort input.
Elsewhise FF will ignore the username.
Hope if anybody experiences the same Problem this will help.
Ferion
On 1 Feb., 18:34, Ferion wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> i'm trying to use a loginform for an pure aja
Hi Sanil Music,
What TJ (it's not CORWDER) want to explain is that you can't do what
you're trying to do or use the ajax request in synchronous mode .
In execution mode, the JS thread in the browser will execurt the
AJAX.Request, and continue like if nothing was done by this function.
There is jus
I use & instead of &, but I don't know why you can't see it here.
For you Cowder, that I wanted a Ajax Request like that, I would use
it. I want something else. As in my code, I want to create a one
function for all ajax requests. So, I just call that function, and in
it I define callback function,
Also, do you really mean to have & in your querystring?
> if(!ajaxRequest('/chat.php?a=chat_post&m='+encodeURIComponent
& is HTML escaped. I think you mean & (an unescaped CGI
separator).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo
Hi,
There are several issues with that JavaScript code (I can't comment on
the PHP). Two of the main issues:
* You're checking the return value from a function (`ajaxRequest`)
that you never return a value from. That means that the value you're
checking is `undefined`, which is falsey, and so the
Le lundi 21 décembre 2009 13:05, T.J. Crowder a écrit :
> You're just looking in the wrong place. The second parameter to the
> onSuccess callback is the value of the X-JSON *header*, if any. It's a
> means of sending back extra data alongside the main response. You're
> sending JSON back in the b
Hi,
> What am I doing wrong?
You're just looking in the wrong place. The second parameter to the
onSuccess callback is the value of the X-JSON *header*, if any. It's a
means of sending back extra data alongside the main response. You're
sending JSON back in the body, not a header. To access that,
Weird, maybe I thought it was doing what it should do... Either way, nice fix
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
evilC wrote:
For future reference,
document.observe('resize',winResize);
Never fires. Maybe because the document as a whole has not been
extended?
However,
Event.observe(window, 're
For future reference,
document.observe('resize',winResize);
Never fires. Maybe because the document as a whole has not been
extended?
However,
Event.observe(window, 'resize', winResize);
worked fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & s
Very, very cool.
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
evilC wrote:
The idea of Placebook is social networking for places. Sort of like if
you could have a facebook or twitter account for a place. People can
log in and add locations, then people can make posts on it's wall, or
add tags to the location to d
The idea of Placebook is social networking for places. Sort of like if
you could have a facebook or twitter account for a place. People can
log in and add locations, then people can make posts on it's wall, or
add tags to the location to denote activies and social groups
associated with that place
A good place to start, add:
console.log('this is my first debug output');
Anywhere inside of a loaded dom closure (like your initializer function or
prototype's document.observe('dom:loaded', ...); )
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
evilC wrote:
Great, that worked. I didn't realise "this" could be so
Great, that worked. I didn't realise "this" could be something else...
Also, bear in mind that I only started using prototype for this
project yesterday. Hell, I ripped it out and put it back in since I
made the first post - hence a lot of the code does not use prototype
properly (Though a search
Good outlook :)
I should also mention that whatever it your creating, so far, seems really
neat. I'd like to see how it develops.
The code cleaning suggestions I made will make a diff regarding the fix I sent
you.
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
evilC wrote:
Thanks for all the help and advice guys
Thanks for all the help and advice guys!
Yes, I know the code is quite horrific at the moment - due to the way
I have my uni projects scheduled, I need to get the basic add/edit
functionality working as soon as humanly possible so that I can do
some HCI evaluation on the UI. Once that is done, I ca
Also, in PHP related advice, *ereg *and *split* are deprecated. if you
turned on your PHP errors and use E_ALL, it will throw back errors.
Rick
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:
> Actually, my reasoning for that response was a fluke, so ignore it
>
>
> the problem: you're cal
Actually, my reasoning for that response was a fluke, so ignore it
the problem: you're calling "*this*.deleteform()"
I noticed you use all kinds of alert()'s for debugging... i'd recommend
learning firebug and making it your very best friend. Firebug told me that "
*this*" IS NOT *pb_editloc*, i
The problem is that when the dom is loaded... there is no such thing as
"pb_add_location".
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:09 PM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Just tried onComplete - no joy
>
> You probably don't want onComplete. onComplete is called regardless of
> whether the request was succ
Hi,
> Just tried onComplete - no joy
You probably don't want onComplete. onComplete is called regardless of
whether the request was successful. You probably want onSuccess and
onFailure, doing different things.
-- T.J.
On Dec 6, 7:25 pm, evilC wrote:
> Just tried onComplete - no joy
>
> I uplo
Hi,
> Once the AJAX reply comes back that the data was updated, I want to
> destroy the form. But it won't let me. I guess for a similar reason to
> my explanation above - the button started the call, and it is in the
> response code that I wish to destroy it, so it technically hasn't
> finished y
Just tried onComplete - no joy
I uploaded a copy to http://www.evilc.com/pb/pb.zip, should anyone be
so kind as to be inclined to take a look at it.
If you have a localhost LAMP server (I use XAMPP) with default sql
account of root/ , it will work without any modifications -
just create a databas
I have put up a version on my web server.
http://www.evilc.com/pb
The JS file is at http://www.evilc.com/pb/placebook.js - the code you
are interested in will be in the pb_editloc object near the end.
The HTML of the form is at
http://www.evilc.com/pb/templates/pb_add_location.html
(the php grab
Instead of onSuccess, try using onComplete...
-- Sent from my Palm Prē
evilC wrote:
Thanks TJ, I tried to make a self-contained version, so I ripped out
prototype and did the same thing with object literals, and I still had
issues, so clearly it wasnt prototype.
In the end I figured out that t
Thanks TJ, I tried to make a self-contained version, so I ripped out
prototype and did the same thing with object literals, and I still had
issues, so clearly it wasnt prototype.
In the end I figured out that the button which fired off the AJAX
request (ie the "Submit" button) was inside a form (I
Hi,
> is prototype broken?
No, I use Ajax functions within classes all the time.
> however, if you encapsulate the code inside a class:
>
> var myclass = Class.create({
>
>
> });
If I "cut and paste exact same code into here" I get this:
> var myclass = Class.create({
> new Ajax.Reque
And identical (almost) answers !! - how bizarre!!!
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "T.J. Crowder"
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:51 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: ajax request
Hi,
Nearly identical questions at almost the same time. :-)
Here's the other one, where I've posted an answer:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/thread/6af62cd45d76f06e
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowde
Could be the web server ...
Alot of web servers have a max number of paralell requests per user
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "ziva"
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:05 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] ajax req
Hi,
Just use the onCreate callback instead of the onLoading one and you
will be all set.
Best,
Tobie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send
So this means I can only have one swirly going on at any time because
it's always hiding and showing #ajaxloadingindicator. What if I have
two or more Ajaxed GUI element on the page that needed the swirlies?
On Oct 19, 11:12 pm, "speedpac...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had the same issue, but
Hi,
I had the same issue, but fixed it as follows:
Ajax.Responders.register( {
onCreate: function() {
// update a span on the page displaying the number of actively
executing AJAX calls...
$('ajaxcounter').update(Ajax.activeRequestCount);
if (Ajax.activeRequestCount === 1) {
yh that sounds great, if nothing else it may help cement a few ideas
in my head. Ive seen many free frameworks thatplugin for window UI's
e.c.t. but i wouldnt learn bugger all if i used them. video's, demo's,
code snippets, and anything else anyone can provide will be of use to
me in one way or an
Hi DJ Lee.
I have built and run a successfull ajax style cross browser desktop and is
used in many businesses as a contact manager with alot more. I would be
happy to share my code with you or help in anyway that i can. As luck would
have it i started to make some video demo's last night to sh
fyi: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=22748
On Sep 25, 10:26 am, Alex wrote:
> yeah sure, that's what i thought too. was just testing the water to
> see if anyone else had come across the problem. nothing in google but
> then, as you say, it's still very early days.
>
> On Sep
yeah sure, that's what i thought too. was just testing the water to
see if anyone else had come across the problem. nothing in google but
then, as you say, it's still very early days.
On Sep 24, 5:22 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's strange. It sounds like something to report to the G
Hi,
That's strange. It sounds like something to report to the Google
Frame team, though, since it doesn't happen normally. Google Frame is
"early-stage"[1] after all...
[1] http://code.google.com/chrome/chromeframe/
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 24, 3:53 pm, Alex wrote:
> fair point...
>
> yeah, with
fair point...
yeah, with 1.6.1, rails still reports "*/*"
On Sep 24, 3:01 pm, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is with prototype 1.6.0.2.
>
> Any chance of trying it with something more recent? 1.6.0.3 was
> released a year ago, and 1.6.1 was released last month.
>
> -- T.J.
>
> On Sep
Hi,
> This is with prototype 1.6.0.2.
Any chance of trying it with something more recent? 1.6.0.3 was
released a year ago, and 1.6.1 was released last month.
-- T.J.
On Sep 24, 1:07 pm, Alex wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> just trying out our site at work with chrome frame, and found an odd
> effe
mp; script.aculo.us"
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:40 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax requests again
Alex,
> 1. Element that triggered the call (if any)
"if any" doesn't make any difference to the question -- again, you
can't get that information from
J. Crowder"
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:47 AM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax requests again
>
> Alex,
>
> > 1. The element that triggered the call
>
> What element? Ajax calls can be initiated by any
26, 2009 9:47 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax requests again
Alex,
> 1. The element that triggered the call
What element? Ajax calls can be initiated by any code, anywhere, and
don't necessarily have anything to do with any element "triggering"
them. For example:
is clears things up a bit
>
> Alex Mcauleyhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Timo"
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:11 PM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax requ
bit
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "Timo"
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:11 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax requests again
>
> On 20 Aug., 17:15, Alex Mcauley
> wrote:
&g
On 20 Aug., 17:15, Alex Mcauley
wrote:
> earlier on in the month i posted on how to do some things with Ajax
> requests genericaly like adding a loading message to all requests and
> i got a couple of responses but not many.
>
> I've been giving it alot of thought and i cam up with addMethods as
Dhttp://www.thevacancymarket.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Atanu Dey"
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:05 AM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Ajax call is not working in MAC(Firefox)
>
>
