'ProtocolError('Connection
>> aborted.', error(104, 'Connection reset by peer'))': /simple/six/
>> WARNING: Retrying (Retry(total=0, connect=None, read=None, redirect=None,
>> status=None)) after connection broken by 'ProtocolError('Connecti
If Review Board is configured to use AD, it will try that first for all
users. If that authentication fails, then it will use the database
password. Assuming those users have AD accounts, you shouldn't need to do
anything--they'll be able to log in with their AD credentials. You can
enforce this by
Hi,
You shouldn't need to install 2.5.7. If you install your desired version on
your target host, then move the database and data directory over, you
should be able to run `rb-site upgrade`.
David
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 4:35 PM Grover D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running a very old version of R
e
> the clone. The compatibility issues are very severe.
>
> Thanks! I appreciate the help!
>
> On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 5:39:23 PM UTC-6 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You shouldn't need to install 2.5.7. If you install your desired version
&g
request which uses Subversion → Update → Update Diff).
>
> On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 9:35:39 PM UTC+3 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have a fix for this issue and will be shipping 6.0.2 soon.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 28
Hi,
This is a known issue and will be fixed in 6.0.2
David
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:18 AM Mikalai Ananenka wrote:
> Hello,
> Although this is minor issue, it can affect user experience, so I thought
> you might want to fix it. RB 6.0.1.
>
> Ensure you are logged in and then click "Log out" pop
Looking into this, your GitLab version is quite old. We've verified that
this works correctly with modern versions.
David
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 3:54 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report. The exception information is very helpful!
>
> We’ll look into what changed in GitL
Hi,
It looks like your server name is set to "https://example.com"; in the
Review Board General Settings page. SAML requires the server name to be set
correctly to whatever domain your IdP is expecting.
David
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 9:23 AM Enzo wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering if anyone ha
Parameters to PUT and POST operations in the API need to be specified as
form-data, not query parameters or JSON. This can be done with the -F
parameter to curl:
curl -H "Authorization: ..." -H "Accept: ..." -X PUT-F "email="
https:///api/users//
David
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:45 AM Lyova Pogos
Florian,
You probably had subvertpy installed previously. Review Board 6 has removed
the subvertpy backend because it caused significant problems. You'll need
to install PySVN. We have a guide for doing that at
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/latest/admin/installation/linux/#installing-svn
Florian,
If you're seeing "missing support" in the list, it's because pysvn isn't
loaded correctly. You'll still be able to create/edit repositories but they
won't actually work until that's fixed. Recreating the repository
configurations won't change that, and deleting a repository entry will
del
> reviewboard_1 | [2024-03-04 15:43:51 +] [15] [INFO] Using worker:
> gthread
> reviewboard_1 | [2024-03-04 15:43:51 +0000] [16] [INFO] Booting worker
> with pid: 16
> reviewboard_1 | [2024-03-04 15:43:51 +] [17] [INFO] Booting worker
> with pid: 17
> reviewboard_1 | [
7;m curious (and a bit confused):
> I head a look at
> https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/release-6.0.2/contrib/docker/Dockerfile
> and found that pysvn building and installation already is there. Does that
> mean that the official docker image is being built using another
Florian,
The rbchecklist codebase is quite ancient and really needs a full rewrite.
Those discarded changes were from student projects and we decided we didn't
particularly want to be landing changes when we knew that the underlying
design had some fundamental flaws.
I'd love to be able to spend
Can you check what the cache configuration is at /admin/settings/general/ ?
David
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Szymon Niemiec
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> We are using latest reviewboard and we've recently migrated to Docker
> setup. Problem is, reviewboard randomly spits error 500 while brow
Lasse,
You'll need to configure users for Power Pack at
/admin/extensions/rbpowerpack.extension.PowerPackExtension/config/
David
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:34 AM Lasse Bonner wrote:
> When trying to upload a diff file manually I get this error:
> You are not licensed to post review requests ag
Yakir,
We do have the ability for extensions to add additional content to various
pages. There are a number of defined hook points within the review request
box. See
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/latest/extending/extensions/hooks/template-hook/#template-hook
for
details.
David
On Thu,
When sending data to the API, you need to use form-data rather than JSON.
So your curl call would look more like:
curl ...args. -F name=test -F tool=git
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:56 AM 刘天明 wrote:
> ReviewBoard version: 6.0.2
> i wan use rest api create repository
> document：
> https://www.revi
The "taking a nap" error means that Review Board is crashing somewhere. Can
you check the reviewboard and web server logs for errors?
I'd definitely suggest just going straight from your original version to
your target version (preferably 6). Doing upgrades to intermediate versions
is not necessar
tive. Bumping 2.5.16
> to 6 means I'd have to switch to python 3. When I tried upgrading to 4 I
> found an issue where it was conflicting between using 2 and 3. Perhaps I
> was doing something wrong?
>
> Thanks!
> Gabe
>
> On Monday, April 22, 2024 at 5:08:31 PM UT
anks again!
>
> On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 2:17:17 PM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> You definitely need to make sure that everything is using the same Python
> version. In particular, if you're using something like Apache, you need to
> make sure that your mod_wsg
We've seen this kind of behavior before with some misconfigurations. Would
you be able to share your LDAP configuration in Review Board, and let us
know if your LDAP server is configured to allow anonymous binds?
David
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 8:40 PM 胡一辉 wrote:
> Hello:
>
> In our ReviewBoard
Can you tell us what you have set in /admin/settings/storage/ (minus any
secret keys)?
David
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:49 AM Minh Huy Vo wrote:
> As a workaround, I removed avatars information via the Admin UI and users
> are able to access ReviewBoard again.
>
> For other users who don't have
The raw file mask is essentially a format string, which the server uses to
create the URL to fetch blob content. It should explicitly have
"" and "" in it, not a specific file or revision.
So for your case, it should be "http://myserverurl/cgit/myrepo/blob/
?id="
David
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 6:0
The post-commit (post-push) UI is only implemented for certain hosting
services where we have both the APIs we need and the demand from users to
implement it. For the vast majority of cases, our workflow recommendation
is to use rbtools to review code before it gets landed into a central
repository
Hi,
Looks like we've got a bug in the hosting service account resource.
What version of Review Board are you using?
David
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 9:35 AM FeedJ wrote:
> Hi, I am currently trying to write python automation scripts to try and
> automatically add hosting services account without
Hi,
Definitely a bug. We'll get a fix in for 7.0.2.
David
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:09 AM Minh Huy Vo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of our reviewboard users complains that when he's viewing a
> ReviewBoard email in plain text mode, he's also seeing the html syntax. I
> can confirm this. Attached are 2
deleted?
>
> On Wednesday 14 August 2024 at 11:54:27 UTC-4 FeedJ wrote:
>
>> [image: Screenshot 2024-08-14 115239.png]
>> Looks like we are using the latest version.
>> On Wednesday 14 August 2024 at 11:40:19 UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
e(
username=username,
hosting_url=gitlab_server_url,
private_token=gitlab_acc_token,
service_id='gitlab'
)
David
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 8:33 AM David Trowbridge wrote:
> You had sent it to both the reviewboard and reviewboard-dev lists. I
> moderated one messag
this for
> every hosting service like github bitbucket etc.
> On Thursday 29 August 2024 at 11:43:09 UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Actually, I'm not sure what happened to the original message. Google
>> groups sometimes seems to remove data and I don't know why.
>&
Caleb,
Multi-commit review requests are created from the command-line tools.
Depending on your version control system, there are many different ways
that you can select which commits you want to post, with the most common
being to post everything between the upstream branch and your local branch
h
the web UI?
>
> Caleb
>
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at 10:40:03 AM UTC-4 David Trowbridge wrote:
>
>> Caleb,
>>
>> Multi-commit review requests are created from the command-line tools.
>> Depending on your version control system, there are many different ways
What repository type are you using?
-David
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying to start review a new file with no previous revisions and
> am wondering if there is an easy way to create the diff file? What I
> do now is:
>
> diff -u -N filename /dev/
If you "svn add" a file, it will appear in the diffs. I don't recall
whether "svn diff" is smart enough to cope with that (I think it is),
but post-review definitely is.
-David
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SVN
>
When you run './manage.py syncdb', it should ask you for a username
and password for the admin.
-David
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM, wex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any log file I can examine to try and debug this admin login
> issue?
>
> On Sep 16, 2:06 pm, wex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Aha, this looks like a Django user/pass. Browsing the django manual,
>> > it seems as though I should run "manage.py createsuperuser",
>> > but when I do that, it just hangs. Sigh. I'll bet that happened as
; > > Thanks for the tips, but still no dice.
>>
>> > > > The Getting Started docs explicitly say that you need to create a
>> > > > database when using mysql (see the "Database" section). If you don't
>> > > > create a database
This is tracked in issue 489. We've been trying to think of a good
way to handle this case; for now, discussions work okay.
-David
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How do you suggest to deal with the situation where person A marks the
> review as "s
Review Board uses Django's database abstractions, so it should work
fine. We've heard from a couple people who have deployed on top of pg,
but MySQL is far more common.
-David
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Juan Jose Comellas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can ReviewBoard store its data on Postg
A couple notes on this:
1. The automake build system hasn't been removed yet, but we're all
but converted over to setuptools for installation. This will be going
away soon; if you need anything in the setuptools install for your
packaging work, please let us know.
2. In future, please submit patch
A couple notes on this:
1. The automake build system hasn't been removed yet, but we're all
but converted over to setuptools for installation. This will be going
away soon; if you need anything in the setuptools install for your
packaging work, please let us know.
2. In future, please submit patch
The "Submitter" is the user on the reviewboard site.
-David
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:07 AM, 13Strider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> when i post a review from other user user on review board shows my
> name as the submitter even though it was submitted form a different pc
> wit ha different use
Review board works with remote SVN repositories. This is how
http://reviews.review-board.org is set up (SVN lives on google code,
review board lives on a VM hosted in a colo).
There's not currently a way to make sure the repository is added
correctly beyond posting a diff correctly. One thing th
Once it's working, we'll want to add it to the fixtures so people can
easily select the repository type. Other than that, all you need to do
is implement the SCMTool class.
It's also useful to implement the client-side in post-review for most SCMs.
Good luck,
-David
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:0
These past couple days, Christian and I have been looking at
performance. Especially in large deployments, reviewboard can get a
bit pokey.
One thing we discovered is that the database accesses for the
dashboard weren't optimal. We've added some custom indexes to the
codebase, but they'll only be
We send emails on 1, 3 and 4. There's an open bug about 2, but no
immediate ETA for fixing it.
-David
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:01 AM, fts1050 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was wondering what all the events that cause an email trigger. My
> guess would be:
>
> 1.)When a review goes "live" (to
You need to upgrade your perforce API on the server to 07.3 or 08.1
-David
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, AndyP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We've been running reviewboard now internally for 6 months or so now,
> and I was going to create a new server for a much wider audience.
>
> I made th
This was fixed in SVN last night. Can you update your install and try again?
-David
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I change my authentication method to LDAP, I get this red text:
>
> LDAP authentication requires the python-ldap library, which is not
>
We've been working towards this. You can keep an eye on our plans at
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Roadmap
-David
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Elmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, so Django 1.0 'official release, not alpha', has been released
> for over a month. That is the
We made some improvements to the caching for this, but it's still
extremely inefficient. We're tracking the problem as bug 692
(http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=692) but
haven't had time to fix it.
-David
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:31 AM, H M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We
The best thing to do would be do post a review request on
http://reviews.review-board.org/
If you want to add unit tests before posting the review, that would be awesome.
I think this is only really documented as the "code reviews" link
under "contributing" on the web site. We really need to wri
With Perforce, review requests are tied to changeset numbers. What you
describe would involve creating a new review request. This is because
we wrote it with pre-commit reviews in mind instead of post-commit.
-David
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Lyndon Washington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H
We did just that about a month ago. If you update your copies of
djblets and reviewboard, you'll notice that subsequent views for large
diffs are much, much better.
-David
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Mike Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been running review board for a few
hon?
>
> -Mike
>
> On Nov 10, 2:44 pm, "David Trowbridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We did just that about a month ago. If you update your copies of
>> djblets and reviewboard, you'll notice that subsequent views for large
>> diffs are much, much
FYI, in SVN revision r1573, I've committed the patch from
http://reviews.review-board.org/r/634/
This generalizes the LDAP authentication scheme to work better with
OpenLDAP. If you're using LDAP authentication, you'll have to update
your settings:
Your "User Mask" currently looks something like
I think this is probably a little too specific to your deployment -- I
think it would be hard to find a set of categories that people could
agree on.
What I'd suggest is to wait until extensions support lands (which
should hopefully be in a couple months), and then develop this as an
extension.
This is what the "post-review" script is for. It understands a number
of types of repositories (though not quite all of the ones that
reviewboard supports), and in some cases (such as perforce) can fill
in some fields of the review request from the changeset description.
-David
On Mon, Dec 8, 2
Are you up to date with djblets too?
-David
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:01 AM, TP wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the latest version of reviewboard and it should have the
> large data caching feature. But I keep getting this warning in the log
>
> WARNING - Failed to fetch large data from cache for
Django permissions could be used for this, but it won't be elegant.
Maybe a better way would be to decouple bitkeeper changes from
Repository objects somehow.
On 11/29/08, Sujith wrote:
>
> Hi ReviewBoard Team,
>
> We here have enabled ReviewBoard to work with
> BitKeeper (VCS).
This is something we've been wanting to implement, but it's been lower
priority than a lot of other things for 1.0. If you're interested in
digging into the code, we'd love to see it done sooner.
-David
On 12/22/08, Nithin Sujir wrote:
>
> I am really loving the memcache feature. But one minor
I don't think anyone is using reCaptcha, but we also aren't a popular
enough system to have had to deal with automated spambots. It's
possible that at some time in the future we'll need to add captcha
support.
-David
2009/1/10 DeeJay1 :
>
> Hello.
>
> I've just installed review board after many f
Any review request which is a number followed by zeroes (100, 2000,
3) gets a trophy.
Any palindrome gets a fish trophy.
-David
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Martin wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> thanks so much!
> I'll update our server first thing in the morning.
>
> How else do you get
Do you have the "p4" binary somewhere in the path on your server?
-David
On 1/30/09, 13Strider wrote:
>
> I have everything setup and working , i use post-review to submit and
> it works fine,
> when i go to the browser i see my review request, but when click on
> view diff i get this error
>
>
The old install procedure meant a lot of people ended up putting data
in their site-packages. rb-site doesn't do that anymore.
-David
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Łukasz Jernaś wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:12 PM, mary wrote:
>>
>> Issue resolved.
>>
>> For reasons still a bit unclear
The demo server does point to the active SVN server. This is okay
because review board never does any commits to version control.
-David
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Anthony Foglia wrote:
>
> Thanks. I was aware of the tool, but not using it. My questions are
> more about how to use the
There's no automatic method right now. You might be able to write a
script that uses the django shell capabilities to create the groups.
-David
2009/2/17 KunalG :
>
> Hi,
>
> We are setting up review board in our company and found one feature
> which we need.
> We use LDAP authentication for log
In terms of the licensing, Review Board is under the MIT license,
which is extremely permissive. You can use, modify, redistribute, and
generally do anything you want with it, without worrying about legal
repercussions.
-David
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:24 AM, plumpy wrote:
>
> We use it at Trip
I like using mysqlhotcopy to make an on-line copy of the database.
-David
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Sorry for the delay on this. I haven't been around much this weekend.
>
> Mainly, you'll need to backup the database files (you can use mysqlhotcopy
> if using My
We've been toying around with how best to do this for a while. Can you
add your suggestions to
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=294 ? This will
help us keep track of them better.
Thanks!
-David
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Isaac Wagner wrote:
> My users have a real hard
Right now the only additional "attachments" we support uploading are
screenshots (which really means images in general). In the future, we
plan to make this more generic, but that won't happen for a while
unless someone else does it.
-David
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:45 PM, KunalG wrote:
>
> Hi,
Perhaps we need to paginate the reviews page in addition to the diff?
-David
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:03 PM, mary wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply. The slowness is:
> 1. page load takes several minutes (the more comments, the longer it
> takes)
> 2. typing a comment is very slow on reviews w
We're happy to include support for any SCMs out there, but it's not
realistic for us to implement support for cmsynergy or other SCMs that
we don't have access to. If you or someone else were to submit a patch
for a cmsynergy SCMTool, we'd be happy to include it.
-David
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8
terface for cmsynergy.
> Are there any docs that I can refer to?
>
> --aditya
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:51 AM, David Trowbridge
> wrote:
>>
>> We're happy to include support for any SCMs out there, but it's not
>> realistic for us to implement su
I'm not sure how changing the directory structure here would help you,
and even if it does, it may hinder someone else.
If you have something specific you need to do for your own
application, feel free to modify the directory layout for your usage.
That's what the MIT license is there for.
-Davi
Hum. I thought we had worked around all of our cache size problems by
splitting stuff up under multiple keys. What version are you running?
-David
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Martin wrote:
>
> Thank you, I will try the memcache parameters.
>
> Swapping is not an issue for us. Used Swap is
At VMware, we have a couple thousand engineers working on a single
server. Granted, I think it's a VM
with 4GB of RAM and multiple vcpus, but it's still a single server.
We've been addressing performance recently, and while it's pretty
good, there's still more to do. MySQL
isn't a big bottleneck-
2009 at 5:23 PM, Alexey Morozov wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thursday 21 May 2009 16:17:12 David Trowbridge wrote:
>> At VMware, we have a couple thousand engineers working on a single
>> server. Granted, I think it's a VM
>> with 4GB of RAM and multiple vcpus, but
If you're the administrator, you need to use the mysql administration
programs to repair your DB. If you're not, you need to ask your admin.
-David
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, kunjal.par...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> OperationalError at /dashboard/
> (1194, "Table 'reviews_reviewrequest' is mark
I don't see any reason why we shouldn't do this. Accountability is a good thing.
-David
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>
> Hmm... I don't know about that. I mean, if you really wanted to try and stick
> unique identifiers in your p4 commands so you could track which ones wer
It's not currently possible to not have a diff. In the past, we've
just created a dummy diff and reviewed images as screenshots, which
works but isn't great. This request is already tracked in issue 382,
so if you have particular thoughts or needs, please add them there.
Thanks,
-David
On Fri,
When you created the branch, you added a numbered revision in the same
paths as the branch that had the code that was on trunk. You can just
do a revision-range post-review between that revision and your branch
HEAD. If you truly want to diff between the current trunk and the
branch, you can creat
It sounds like maybe the tables aren't UTF-8. I don't recall off the
top of my head how to change the charset of your tables, but I recall
the mysql documentation on the topic being relatively helpful.
-David
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Dmitry Konyshev
wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> First of a
It looks like maybe Django got installed wrong? Can you remove the egg
directory and try reinstalling it?
-David
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:02 AM, grimbeaver wrote:
>
> Anyone have any help at all on this? I don't really want to reload
> the server because of this. I'm using Ubuntu 8.0(4) L
This usually requires a web server restart.
-David
On Sep 24, 2009, at 8:00 AM, Deniz wrote:
>
> I have installed 1.1 alpha 1 to try Review Board. I try to change E-
> Mail settings but it does not get saved. Any idea?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deniz
>
> >
--~--~-~--~~~---
Did you use post-review or try to upload a diff?
If you're doing "cvs diff", you'll need to do "cvs diff -Nrup"
-David
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> "You" being Deniz, not Chris, unless Chris wants to take this on too. :)
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
If you run post-review with --debug, it'll spit out a bunch of output
which should hopefully tell you the real error.
-David
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2009, at 6:10, Raghu wrote:
>
>> post-review is usually run from the user's development box, not
There are a couple of patches I should get in to mark additional
strings and wire up tools, and then basically what will happen is that
there will be 2 files in the "PO template" format which you can then
translate strings into your target language.
There's a handful of stuff that's not mar
IE6 support is a little rocky, but IE7, IE8, and all similarly recent
versions of firefox are supported.
-David
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Kunjal wrote:
> We are on verge of rolling out RB 1.0.5 to 300+ developers.
> Some of our developers use IE and some of them use FireFox.
> Does RB 1.
You can generate a PO file using "./manage.py makemessages -a" from
within the reviewboard tree. This will generate locale/en/django.po. I
think that if there are more locales in the list, it will also
generate PO files for those, too. To compile these into .mo catalogs,
you can use "./manage.py co
If the pygments interface hasn't changed (and I doubt it has), it
should be fine.
-David
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Bickford, Mark
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently running RB 1.0.5.1. Is it possible to just upgrade
> Pygments within it, to their 1.2.2 release, or will that break RB? T
In general we've avoided adding this sort of permissions and policy,
since it adds a lot of UI complexity for what is essentially a
sociology problem. We have a bug open requesting some sort of general
policy set-up (while we try to figure out what that means), but I'd
recommend that this is better
It sounds like various AJAX calls aren't working. A JavaScript
debugger (like firebug) would hel figure out what's wrong but I don't
know if konquerer has such a thing.
-David
On Feb 9, 2010, at 5:07 AM, "daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com" > wrote:
All,
I have encouraged people within my sof
Right now the only way to partition it this way is to run two separate servers.
-David
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote:
> Is there any opportunity to configure one ReviewBoard to many
> independent projects? For example two.
> There are two projects. Each have they own rep
If you're not using memcached, that will be a huge gain.
-David
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> A lot of what Review Board does is computationally expensive, and we've done
> a lot to heavily optimize things. Best way to get speedup is to run it on a
> faster server
I mean by setting up memcached, you'll get a dramatic boost in
performance.
-David
On Mar 3, 2010, at 7:16 PM, JohnHenry wrote:
Do you mean that using memcached will slow down the reviewboard?
Best Regards!
On 3月4日, 上午7时48分, David Trowbridge
wrote:
If you're not using memca
Close is done through the review_request_close view in webapi/json.py
-David
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:22 AM, JohnHenry wrote:
> Hi,
> We had a new requirement of 'close condition'. Only if all target
> reviewers had "ship it" this review, The submitter can 'close' this
> review request by c
Nobody has done this, and I don't expect it would be easy. You'd have
to write a script that could remap all the primary keys for each table
to not conflict, except in the case where users overlap between
instances. This would also have to update all foreign key relations.
-David
On Apr 8,
This already exists--in the Authentication settings, there's a
check-box for "Allow anonymous read-only access"
If you then configure RB with a special auth backend, it'll work.
-David
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Christian, how much work do you think it would b
Something caused your database to get corrupted (perhaps a system
crash during an operation). The SQLite page has some scenarios at
http://www.sqlite.org/lockingv3.html#how_to_corrupt but I'm not sure
how to recover from it after it's happened.
Using SQLite as a production database isn't really re
There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary
to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when
more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are
caught early on.
-David
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:57 AM, mnem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is
101 - 200 of 1376 matches
Mail list logo
