On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:04 AM Valentin Kragelj
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using CentOS 8 (as a workstation) on virtual machine in Hyper-V
> Manager. Following this guide (
> https://hostpresto.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-review-board-on-centos-7-2/
> )
> I came until "sudo yum install Revi
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:04 AM Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> It's been a productive (and very busy) few months for us here at
> Beanbag/Review Board. We've had our heads down working toward the
> long-overdue (but justifiably delayed, for reasons I'll get into in another
> post
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:35 AM Paul Mansfield <
paul.mansfi...@agileanalog.com> wrote:
> I found the problem. facepalm. I should have guessed. damn selinux.
>
> I found it because I realised that the avatars weren't working as after
> fixing the directory permissions under .../htdocs/media they st
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:00 AM Daniel wrote:
>
> Hi Christian and Stephen,
>
> I just scanned the forums for possible updates concerning the
> version-compatilities/ version-availabilites and found this post from March.
>
> Some time ago when i was even more unexperienced in the ways of how the
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:31 PM 'Eric Johnson' via Review Board
Community wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks so much for the response! As near as I can tell, ReviewBoard "just
> works" for the teams that use it here, so we're grateful for the quality work.
>
> The issue appears to be solved at th
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM Martin Großhauser
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade ReviewBoard to 2.0.20, but site-upgrade fails with
> output:
>
> # rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Updating database. This may take a while.
>
> The log output below, includin
It took a little longer than usual to get RBTools 1.0.2 out in EPEL 7
and Fedora this time around because I was paving the way to finally
get RBTools running on Python 3 in EPEL 7. As a result, this time
around I need to request more testing from people to make sure that
there are no major issues w
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:15 AM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> The page was written back when EPEL supported the latest versions. We
> might be better off just removing the EPEL reference here and specifying
> the yum module instructions. If there's specific instructions we should
> replace the exist
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:17 PM Paul Mansfield wrote:
>
> Hi,
> the installation instructions for the free version
>
https://www.reviewboard.org/get/instructions/?org-type=business&product=rb&os=linux-rpm&support-level=free
>
> says "Review Board 3.0.14 can be installed using yum from the EPEL
rep
tup will attempt to run
> "openssl version" to identify the location of the library path for
> openssl and whether openssl has the appropriate version
> (currently >= 1.0.0).
>
> If the build process cannot find appropriate openssl binary in t
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 1:40 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Here's the problem. Someone broke the stable updates policy and pushed
> a backwards-incompatible version of requests-oauthlib into Fedora 29's
> updates repositories. I'll stick the older version in the reviewboa
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:00 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:00 AM jeffrey.west via Review Board
> Community wrote:
> >
> > I ran the following commands
> >
> > dnf install memcached
> > dnf module install reviewboard:3.0
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:00 AM jeffrey.west via Review Board
Community wrote:
>
> I ran the following commands
>
> dnf install memcached
> dnf module install reviewboard:3.0
> dnf install mariadb mariadb-server
> systemctl start mariadb
> systemctl enable mariadb
> mysql_secure_installation
>
>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:44 PM Review User
wrote:
>
> Reading the docs it appears ReviewBoard is available in EPEL, or directly on
> a Fedora server. However when I try and install ReviewBoard it says it's not
> available. Do I need to add a repo to get it to install?
>
> [root@localhost ~]# yum
Disabling SELinux is a terrible idea. Instead of disabling it, look at the
Review Board documentation which describes how to configure SELinux sanely.
See near the bottom of
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/creating-sites/
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 5:49 PM MoonWalker
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 5:34 PM Peter Howard wrote:
>
> In the end it was SELinux . . . The various guides out there refer to the
> settings that are always needed:
>
> setsebool -P httpd_can_sendmail 1 setsebool -P httpd_can_network_memcache 1
> setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect_db 1 setsebo
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:18 PM wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> would you maybe have had the possibility to look into a rpm for EPEL7?
> (not sure about either grammar or EPEL naming ... i think i am asking for
> something i can install via yum :)
>
> I was just asking something in a different thread w
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM Stephen Gallagher <
step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM wrote:
>
>> For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just
>> wondering if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages av
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM wrote:
> For Reviewboard 2.x there's EPEL RPM packages available, I'm just
> wondering if Reviewboard is planning to make RPM packages available for
> version 3.0 as well.
>
>
I've been working on it, but it's difficult because EPEL 7 has a lot of
packages that are
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:35 PM eric via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks so much for the response.
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 18, 2018 at 5:03:43 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> It will, yes. You shouldn't need to make changes like
n
more time than the basic packaging work I haven’t been able to get to yet.
I’ll reiterate: if anyone wants to help here, I’m happy to train you up and
take on a comaintainer (or more).
Terry
>
>
>
> *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com]
> *On Beha
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:53 PM Chris Lang wrote:
> Hi Rafal,
>
> Yes, unfortunately EPEL does not have version 3 of ReviewBoard yet.
> I have installed 3.0.3 successfully by running easy_install ReviewBoard
>
> Let me know if you have any issues.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
> On Thursday, March 15
Just to mention, I maintain an RPM packaged version of the 2.5 series for
RHEL and Centos in the EPEL repository which should avoid the version
compatibility question. (I don't work for Beanbag Inc., it's a volunteer
effort)
I have it on my TO DO list to get 3.x out for EPEL, but my regular job ha
When you say you added mod_filter, do you mean you needed to install the
package or that you had changed the default Apache config at some point to
not include it and had to add it back?
I’m trying to figure out if there is a packaging bug and I need to add a
dependency on mod_filter somewhere.
On
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:54 PM David Trowbridge wrote:
> Can you clarify what you mean by "update apache"?
>
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:49 AM Not Saying wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 6:50:52 AM UTC-7, Not Saying wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a procedure to update
__
> (2, 4, 1)
> >>> print haystack.__file__
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/haystack/__init__.pyc
>
>
> Thanks
> Rob
>
> On Thursday, 12 October 2017 10:41:59 UTC+1, Rob Backhurst wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> I've installed that on our
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:40 AM 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Ok, lets hope this can tell you something useful...
>
>
Rob, I just packaged up Haystack 2.4.1 (and did rudimentary testing to see
that ReviewBoard still works). Would you m
Rob, did you install ReviewBoard using pip or using the EPEL 7 RPM?
>From above, it looks like you may have two copies of Haystack on your
system, one installed via RPM and the other possibly installed by
pip/easy_install. You will need to clear out the 2.1.1dev version.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:3
Alexey: Good news! There's a new version of ReviewBoard in EPEL-testing
right now that uses Pygments 2.2. Let me know if that fixes your issue,
please.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:32 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Hmm, this might be a problem unique to the EPEL packages. We are stuck on
&g
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:58 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We've just released Review Board 2.0.30 and 2.5.14, which contain some
> important security fixes. We recommend upgrading ASAP to stay secure.
> There's a fix for a XSS vulnerability, allowing a user to craft a malicious
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:31 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> This may be caused by SELinux. I know the RPMs for stable releases contain
> SELinux rules for this, and maybe those can be extracted and used here. (I
> want to start shipping those ourselves as well.)
>
>
Sorry, I just h
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 4:31 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> This may be caused by SELinux. I know the RPMs for stable releases contain
> SELinux rules for this, and maybe those can be extracted and used here. (I
> want to start shipping those ourselves as well.)
>
> Permissions oth
Hmm, this might be a problem unique to the EPEL packages. We are stuck on
Pygments 1.4 while ReviewBoard recommends 1.6+ IIRC. I may have to look at
packaging an alternate version for use with RB.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:46 PM Alexey Neyman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've seen a rather odd behavior of
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:51 AM Shilpa R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have python version 2.7 on the same Centos machine 5.x :-
>
> python -V
> Python 2.7.10
>
> is it not compatible with RBTools?
>
>
In that case, I advise you to do:
`yum remove RBTools`
followed by
`pip install RBTools`
That *should*
Given that you have 2.5.11, which is the version that was stable repo for
EPEL until today, I am guessing you have the RPMs and suspect you will want
to do "yum update ReviewBoard --enablerepo=updates-testing" and get a copy
of 2.5.13.1
(Note it just went into the EPEL testing repo today, so it mi
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 2:40 AM Shilpa R wrote:
> Ok.
>
> Actually I have machines which are Centos 5/6/7. And I will need Centos 5
> support also for posting review requests on Review board Server.
>
> So on Centos 6 I have successfully connected to ReviewBoard Server with
> the help of 0.7 vers
If that's the case, I suspect you were uploading a diff that included
dependencies on other patches that weren't in the public git tree to which
ReviewBoard is connected.
Instead of using the diff upload on the web UI, try using `rbt post` from
the RBTools package. It should be able to automatical
This sounds like you didn't set up the repo configuration correctly. I'll
pass you back to the developers.
Also, it might not be a bad idea to consider purchasing a support contract
from BeanBag, Inc. and having them help you get up and running. That's what
they're here for!
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 a
RHEL 5 (and therefore CentOS 5) is past end-of-life. I am no longer
supporting its RPMs and I advise you to migrate away from it since it will
not be receiving security updates anymore.
That said, it never got upgraded beyond RBTools 0.5 because it's version of
Python was too old to support 0.6+
O
In general, I would recommend installing the EPEL repository from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#How_can_I_use_these_extra_packages.3F
After that, you should be able to 'yum install ReviewBoard' and it will
pull in all the dependencies.
That said, the package you are likely missing is MySQL-
Or of course that you didn't follow the directions on the master
documentation branch for configuring SELinux.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:25 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Can you *browse* to Review Board at that address? It's entirely possible
> that your firewall is not set up
Can you *browse* to Review Board at that address? It's entirely possible
that your firewall is not set up to permit access on port 80.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:23 AM Shilpa R wrote:
> Please help !!! I am stuck at this point... I am unable to connect to
> ReviewBoard server.
>
> *In reviewboard.
I just double-checked that the ReviewBoard RPM does indeed pull in
MySQL-python, so it has everything it needs to connect to MySQL. What
version of Review Board did you install?
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 7:02 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> That's odd... it should definitely include the opt
That's odd... it should definitely include the options for MySQL and
PostgreSQL. I'm not sure why it wouldn't be...
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:17 AM Shilpa R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While installing review board version 2.5 on Centos 7 linux machine, I am
> only getting one option to select the database.
The official EPEL 7 packages that I maintain are viewable here:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ReviewBoard.git/tree/?h=epel7
Note however that this does not work as a simple backport to EPEL 6 due to
some RHEL/CentOS 6 packages being too old for Review Board to run on them.
On Fri, Jun
he "builds" tab on that link and download them manually). Sorry
for the trouble. If this works for you, please provide feedback.
[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-a281c013fd
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:23 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Sorry, that bug is my
Sorry, that bug is my fault. I didn't realize python-tqdm wasn't available
on RHEL/CentOS 6 yet. I need to package that up and get an update out. I've
been kind of lazy about that. My apologies. I'll work on it now and
hopefully it should be in the epel-testing repo by Monday.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017
If you want to install ReviewBoard 2+ on CentOS 6, you need to completely
remove the RPMs and install from pip instead. Unfortunately RHEL 6 was
frozen on some very old versions of python libraries that Review board
cannot run against.
Since I can't modify official RHEL/CentOS packages to update t
Fedora and EPEL packages are on their way to their respective
updates-testing repositories as well.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We've put out a new release of RBTools 0.7.10, which includes fixes for
> Git, Git-SVN, Subversion, Team Foundation Serve
CentOS 6 does not natively (via RPMs) provide all of the dependencies that
ReviewBoard 2.0+ requires. It is EOL in EPEL 6. If you would like to
upgrade, I recommend upgrading your host OS to CentOS 7. If you cannot do
that, you should remove the ReviewBoard RPMs and use the pip-installed
version in
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:02 PM JD K wrote:
> Thank you for the response. I am standing up a new instance of ReviewBoard
> on Centos 6.7, and 1.7.x was what yum installed from the epel repo, which
> from what I can tell is up to date. I would like to have a newer version of
> Reivew Board though.
You can also try using the EPEL packages for ReviewBoard which will pull in
the correct Django RPM. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL for
information on how to install the EPEL repository. Then do:
yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing ReviewBoard
(The reason for enabling the testing repo is
problem is that RB uses https://www.npmjs.com/package/uglifyjs
> which seems to be version 2.4.10 of https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS2
> while Fedora packages the latest version of
> https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS2 which is available from
> https://www.npmjs.com/package/uglify-js.
>
ly have a patch fairly quickly once you
tell me how to reproduce it.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:34 AM Erik Johansson wrote:
> The EPEL package.
>
> // Erik
>
>
> On Mar 29, 2017 15:10, "Stephen Gallagher"
> wrote:
>
> Did you install ReviewBoard using pip o
Did you install ReviewBoard using pip or did you use the EPEL package for
ReviewBoard and Djblets?
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:12 AM Erik Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are having problems running the collectstatic manage command on our
> CentOS installation (RB 2.5.9). The problem is that we have
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:20 AM O. Holzkamp wrote:
> Hello,
> I had the same problems when trying to execute " rb-site install
> /var/www/reviewerBoard"
>
> After installing the proposed packages, the erro changed as following:
>
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/bin/rb-site", li
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 11:37 PM, krish wrote:
>
> Yes, I have installed ReviewBoard thrugh Yum.
>
> Below are the commands.
> yum install
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/e/epel-release-7-6.noarch.rpm
> yum install ReviewBoard
>
> Thanks,
> Krish
>
Please try:
yum update --e
Sorry, turned out I needed to make one more small change to the
python-djblets package:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/python-djblets/0.9.4/3.el7/noarch/python-djblets-0.9.4-3.el7.noarch.rpm
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:48 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> I'm really sorry for t
;s and Djblets's
> dependencies.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 15:51 Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> Yes, absolutely. Sorry for the trouble. It's going to probably be at least
> a week, because python-publicsuffix isn't in EPEL yet, so I nee
> On Thursday, 8 December 2016 11:49:26 UTC+11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> OK, somehow I missed that Djblets grew a dependency on publicsuffix and
> dnspython and RBTools grew a dependency on python-tqdm.
>
> I'll try to get updates for this ASAP, but publicsuffix isn't
e for me. I wonder is there any way to install 2.5.6.1 version with yum?
> Thanks
>
> On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 22:46:03 UTC+11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:24 AM Pramudita Santoso
> wrote:
>
> Since the update of version 2.5.7, I
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:24 AM Pramudita Santoso <
pramudita.sant...@fivium.co.uk> wrote:
Since the update of version 2.5.7, I am not able to install reviewboard. I
am not sure what I am missing.
My command is very simple
RUN yum groupinstall -y "Development tools"
RUN yum install -y epel-releas
d. (CentOS 6.8)
>
> On 22 November 2016 at 11:43, Stephen Gallagher > wrote:
>
> Please do as Christian suggested and run the audit2allow command (please
> do 'audit2why < /var/log/audit/audit.log' as well) and paste the results
> here. I'll interpret it a
Please do as Christian suggested and run the audit2allow command (please do
'audit2why < /var/log/audit/audit.log' as well) and paste the results here.
I'll interpret it and see whether:
1) It can be fixed by setting an SELinux Boolean or
2) It should be fixed by extending the SELinux policy shippe
t; httpd_can_sendmail 1 $ setsebool -P httpd_can_network_memcache 1
>
>
>
> Is there anything else?
>
>
>
> Terry
>
>
>
> *From:* reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Stephen Gallagher
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:30
That old post is far out of date. See the online documentation which
describes how to run Review Board with SELinux in enforcing mode (much more
secure!)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:59 AM Muneer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The issue is resolved.
> I came across an old post from Christian,
>
> "Can you check i
Yes, Review Board is in the EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux)
repository provided by the Fedora Project.
I've never tested it with Amazon Linux though; it's only known to work with
RHEL 7 and CentOS 7.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:36 PM Tim Cares wrote:
help other users (and at least some of
> our developers), though, so thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Alexey.
>
>
> On 10/19/2016 12:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Alexey, if you're using RHEL or Fedora clients, I can patch the official
> Fedora and EPEL packages to incl
Alexey, if you're using RHEL or Fedora clients, I can patch the official
Fedora and EPEL packages to include that for you until it releases
upstream.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:49 PM Alexey Neyman
wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Are RBTools 0.7.7 in the queue, too? It's almost half a year since the
> 0
Did you follow the instructions for setting up ReviewBoard in the
administrator documentation?
Also, what OS is this? If it's RHEL/CentOS 7, you can use the RPMs I
provide in the EPEL 7 repository rather than easy_install.
But I suspect that the problem was that you didn't copy the generated
conf
On CentOS 7, you will have a much easier time if you follow the
instructions at
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/#if-you-re-running-centos-red-hat-etc
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:58 PM Cui Fisher wrote:
> pip install logs
>
>
>
> In file included from /usr/
Don't try to use the Django version shipped in EPEL 6, it's too old. EPEL 7
(For Red Hat Enterprise Linux/CentOS 7) has Django 1.6 which works with
ReviewBoard 2.5.
Or on EPEL 6, just remove the RPM packages entirely and install ReviewBoard
with pip.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:04 AM Cui Fisher w
kinit/keytabs relate to the user. Does this
>> have to be run within the same login session as the apps needing tickets?
>> I'm wondering if there's a way to have, say, an Apache crontab refresh a
>> session periodically, so that svn can continue to get the right tickets
&g
Hi! I'd actually like to work with you on this, as I've been aiming to
build a set of Review Board images that will deploy easily as pods in
OpenShift/Kubernetes. (Notably, the major thing to solve is getting the pod
to run without requiring root privileges.)
I'm on vacation this week, but maybe w
I don't have time to work on such a patch directly, but I'd be happy to
lend my Kerberos experience towards reviewing any such patch. I think that
would be a very useful feature.
I'd recommend working on full SPNEGO support rather than a
Kerberos-specific solution. Take a look at the python-gssapi
My guess would be SELinux; if the directory you moved it to isn't on
SELinux's list of "places the web server is allowed to read", that could be
interfering. Or you could have forgotten to set the
"httpd_can_network_memcached" Boolean.
Try running "setenforce 0" as root and restating Apache. If it
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:15 AM Rory Gao wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, I disabled the selinux and it works.
>
>
Well, you *shouldn't* disable SELinux. You should figure out which SELinux
step you skipped and correct it, that way SELinux can help protect you.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Po
Follow the directions in the manual for setting it up. My guess is that you
did not set the appropriate SELinux booleans or else you installed
ReviewBoard to a directory where Apache doesn't have SELinux access
permission.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:42 AM Rory Gao wrote:
> Dear,
>
> I installed t
eason this
happened is that I made a mistake rebasing the patch for the dependencies
and no one ever tested the update, so it went stable after the timeout
period. Please help test this one!)
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:14 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> I thought I had fixed the mime parse thing
d from: )
> ..
>
> It might be he left Redhat and does not maintain the rpm anymore. I tried
> to build newer rpm just by replacing Version to 2.7.4 in .spec file and new
> sources. It builds ok. Not sure how to promote the spec file change.
>
> /v
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 a
Sorry Vlad, that's my fault. I didn't notice the upgraded requirement. I'm
going to try to get Whoosh updates in EPEL7 on Monday (once I talk to the
maintainer of that package to figure out if they held it to the older
version intentionally).
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:01 PM Vlad wrote:
> Hi Chris
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:03 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We just put out releases of Review Board 2.0.23 and 2.5.4. These include a
> number of bug fixes and improvements, along with some security fixes for
> self-XSS vulnerabilities.
>
> There's a write-up about this on our a
Well, the obvious question is: what source code version-control system are
you using, and are you currently in that directory?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:04 AM thanga durai
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed bitnami-reviewboard-2.5.2-1, which is working
> fine.
>
> But I'm not able to us
Another alternative would be to set up mod_rewrite so that requests to the
IP address are externally redirected to the hostname (which is probably a
necessity if you're using HTTPS anyhow).
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:35 PM Christian Hammond
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> We don't (currently) use Django's l
Check that you followed every step on
https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/creating-sites/#apache
(See also the patch https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/7783/diff/2#0 which
has more information and better formatting for those instructions).
I suspect you're hitting SELinu
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016, 3:40 PM wrote:
> Is there a way to install ReviewBoard manually from a package? I want to
> install it on a linux redhat server but it's doesn't have access outside
> the network. Please advise. Thanks!
>
I maintain a set of Review Board RPMS in the EPEL project. You can
>
>
>>
> *From:* revie...@googlegroups.com [mailto:revie...@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Pierre Bouffard
>>
>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2016 11:50 AM
>> *To:* reviewboard
>> *Subject:* Re: Remote git server: No authentication methods available
>>
>
>>
>> Hi Terry,
>>
>>
>>
>> We use
OK, that looks like Apache or mod_wsgi experienced a segmentation fault
(crash). What operating system is this? RHEL/CentOS 7?
Could you attempt to get a backtrace of the crash so we can track it down?
Given that it's failing in Apache, I suspect that once we get the
backtrace, you'll want to file
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:18 AM Ken Erickson wrote:
> Done
>
> On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 4:19:50 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> Ken, Cian and Sean: since you have had positive experiences, would you
>> mind signing into Bodhi (instructions in th
it without karma.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:17 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> I left that out intentionally, though I may add it as a Suggests:
> dependency (which is not installed by default but may be offered as a
> suggestion by the package manager). It isn't required for normal o
small, I skipped it.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:09 AM Cian Mc Govern
wrote:
> On 4 December 2015 at 16:18, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
>> Hello, folks! It's time for a big update. As many of you are probably
>> aware, I maintain the RPMs of Review Board that live in Fed
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM Ken Erickson wrote:
> I just installed 2.5.2 on CentOS 7 for testing, other than comments below
> I haven't found anything.
> I do have a question, I installed the Comment Categorization extension and
> added 4 types to it but when I try to use it the list is empty
Did you run this with the recent django-evolution 0.7.6 update? That
specifically addresses some upgrade issues unique to MySQL.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015, 9:40 PM rfs wrote:
> Some additional information after further experimentation:
>
> * I tried upgrading from the same 1.7.27 database to 2.0.18. T
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:29 AM Paul Fee wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> That's great news, I had been wondering if Fedora/RHEL users would be
> seeing RB2.5 soon.
>
> On Fedora, it looks like the Django packages have moved ahead to 1.8, but
> RB still needs 1.6. Hence ReviewBoard has disappeared from
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:21 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Hmm, I thought I fixed that version. I'll push an update immediately. If
> you manually run `yum update python-django-evolution
> --enablerepo=epel-testing` and then attempt the upgrade, does that resolve
> your up
applied evolutions for webapi.
>
> Installing custom SQL ...
>
> Installing indexes ...
>
> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>
> No evolution required.
>
> --- -------
>
>
> However many times I run the upgrade though, the
Hello, folks! It's time for a big update. As many of you are probably
aware, I maintain the RPMs of Review Board that live in Fedora's EPEL
project[1] (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux).
For some time now, EPEL 7 (which provides community-supported add-on
software for RHEL 7 and CentOS 7) has b
I plan to look into the EPEL 7 packages when I get back from holiday on
Monday. I'll be upgrading EPEL 7 to Review Board 2.5 as well.
I'm not sure of the specific issue you're seeing, but I will be testing new
deployments.
Could you at least identify the database you are using?
On Thu, Nov 26, 2
As time goes on, it has become more and more difficult to dedicate the time
to maintain the RPM packages of Review Board on Fedora and EPEL (for
RHEL/CentOS). My day-job responsibilities have increased and I can't spare
as much time as I used to for personal projects like this one.
I still use Rev
I'd personally recommend moving to a CentOS 7 host and my EPEL 7 RPMs,
which has 2.0.x today and will have 2.5.x once it's released.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:46 PM Chris Lang wrote:
> Hey I am wondering if there are any success stories for this upgrade on
> older versions of these os'.
> I have
1 - 100 of 504 matches
Mail list logo
