Have you tried other solutions? Try it with xNormal to check your results. In
my opinion Ultimapper is quite useless without cage. Since we left Ultimapper
out of the formula, we have no issues at all.
Back to your problem. As far as I know, there are three normal mapping type,
world, object
So guys, I spent a weekend working with Maya...HOW THE F@CK THIS PROGRAM IS
USED IN PRODUCTION?
Ok, I can use Maya, I have a quite solid background working with Maya, but
seriously guys...It's so overcomplicated, and brainkilling...In Softimage
almost everything is just fine (OK, we
*So guys, I spent a weekend working with Maya…HOW THE F@CK THIS PROGRAM IS
USED IN PRODUCTION?*
This is the same question I always ask myself after using Maya when
required... and Maya being the Industry Standard makes you understand so
many things about the industry standards...
Same here, every time I use maya I hate the experience and wonder myself his is
it possible that it is still being used?
The workflow is f@cked up you become miserable.
I use Houdini mainly now although we will get Softimage very soon, wasting too
much time for things Houdini is not good at.
we use Maya primarily at our studio, but recently there has been a few
artists talking about modo and testing it out. they were very impressed,
however, most of the stuff they were showing me, or thought was impressive
was already standard workflow in softimage.
but softimage isnt and never was
Or lack of
Sent from my iPhone
On 6 Jan 2014, at 09:08, James De Colling james.decoll...@gmail.com wrote:
we use Maya primarily at our studio, but recently there has been a few
artists talking about modo and testing it out. they were very impressed,
however, most of the stuff they were
Is it just my biased point of view that all studios that closed or filed for bancruptcy last year were Maya based?It could of course be that there are more Maya based studios closing than Softimage based ones simply because there are more Maya based studios, but I still smell a pattern there.I
*those who use Softimage, and those who have never tried*
S true :)
It is really impossible to anyone that actually put any effort in SI to try
it out longer then 5 minutes and to see him after that going back to that
other dinosaur.. I mean really as you mentioned how anyone can do anything
Am 1/6/2014 10:08 AM, schrieb James De Colling:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Jordi Bares jordiba...@gmail.com
mailto:jordiba...@gmail.com wrote:
Same here, every time I use maya I hate the experience and wonder
myself his is it possible that it is still being used?
like this:
Softimage is the Dreamcast of DCC apps.
Playstation had the slick marketing, Dreamcast had the tech but got chewed
to pieces by the Playstation hype machine and Playstation won. When Sega
finally gave up on the console business every man and his dog came out
singing the praises of the Dreamcast.
[..] working with Maya…HOW THE F@CK THIS PROGRAM IS USED IN PRODUCTION??
[..]
He, he, I can only agree. It is the most buggy and unusable application I have
ever had the displeasure to use.
How anybody can seriously work with Maya is frankly beyond me.
Hats off to all those pour souls who
Actually Stefan you’re just right. I converted many hardcore Max and Maya
artists to Softimage, and they would never ever look back. However industry
might force them (like me)…
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Stefan
SI is way more artist friendly than Maya, but that doesn't make a company
choose it, specially when the big ones have their propietary tools that can
make Maya almost as good as Softimage. (I haven't worked for a big company
so I can only imagine how good Maya with steroids can be)
Maya out of
I'm one of those poor souls using Maya on a daily basis. The experience is
even more miserable considering I've been happily using XSI since v3.0 till
last year. I think a lot of times how good XSI already was ten years ago,
when Maya 4.0 was just a big pile of sh!t. XSI had already nailed the
In my humble opinion the secret to getting Soft into studios is the suites,
it’s how I got Soft into the building. We needed Maya as that’s what we were
all using before we started our new company and we really needed to hit the
ground running, and we also needed Mudbox. The nice thing was
In teenager point of view, working on dead software is wy cooler.
Le 06/01/2014 11:38, Graham Bell a écrit :
Ah, the Dreamcast, a fine console but flawed form the beginning. The tech was
ok, but really just a pc and essentially the predecessor to the Xbox.
The problem with the
Sorry to hear that Martin, make sure you convert them though.
;-)
Jordi Bares
jordiba...@gmail.com
On 6 Jan 2014, at 10:23, Martin Contel martin3d...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm one of those poor souls using Maya on a daily basis. The experience is
even more miserable considering I've been happily
Hi Emilio,
Actually the pythonlibs are stored under C:\modules\pythonlibs, if I
remember correctly I found this solution on si-community
I'm able to build the rig for the mouth properly without any error, but not
the one for the eye :(
2014/1/5 Emilio Hernandez emi...@e-roja.com
Have you
Maybe true but one thing to keep in mind is you don't have to spend extra money
for mental ray (at least no significant amount). For one man shows like me mr
is still useful. I use it on a small farm with 8 nodes plus the workstation.
Switching to arnold will cost me 9000€ . Thats roughly the
It would be nice to see the next-gen Softmayahybrid leaning towards something
like VRay.
It is also mature and available for all 3 DCC apps, too.
Pretty much all jobs I had the last two, three years were VRay based.
Maybe a random Arnold job but really, regardless of DCC app, usually VRay as
ehmdumb error :D
Basically I didn't setup the Root under the Rig Part Settings, that was
the error, now the rig works :)
2014/1/6 Nicolas Esposito 3dv...@gmail.com
Hi Emilio,
Actually the pythonlibs are stored under C:\modules\pythonlibs, if I
remember correctly I found this solution on
Cool you got it working. You can actually take the libs out of the python
folder. I prefer to do so because if you upgrade python or something else
you will need to move everything again, and personally I don't like to mess
around to much when something is working.
So you can leave your lib on
Investing 9k EUR right now, how many hours would actually be saved when
moving from mray? :)
It is big investment but down the road from what I saw so far.. Arnold
gives back soon everything invested and then so more. Same on Redshift
field... Rendering for SI was pretty much nightmare and now
First place I worked at I saw a young woman creative from an agency come
into the 3D area. She was squinting at the monitor and I couldn't tell what
she was looking at, then she says Oh thank God, they're SGI!.
Eric
Freelance 3D and VFX animator
http://vimeopro.com/user7979713/3d-work
On
wasn't there a nice thread on this a while ago, funny comments from
agency people? ;-)
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 6-1-2014 16:25, Eric Lampi wrote:
First place I worked at I saw a young woman creative from an agency
come into the 3D area. She was squinting at the monitor and
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Stefan Kubicek s...@tidbit-images.com wrote:
Is it just my biased point of view that all studios that closed or filed for
bancruptcy last year were Maya based?
It could of course be that there are more Maya based studios closing than
Softimage based ones
It's the drivers who choose what cars to drive.
Written with my thumbs...
On Jan 6, 2014, at 17:00, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@hybride.com wrote:
Like!! hahaha
Blame the driver not the car for those closures...
On 1/6/2014 10:49 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:21
The irony of course is that Autodesk is doing to Softimage what SGI did to
themselves ;)
Kudos to the creative for knowing SGI existed
From: Eric Lampi [ericla...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 January 2014 05:25 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: rumor,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Graham Bell graham.b...@autodesk.comwrote:
I still see people now, some experienced Maya vets, who aren't using the
hotbox or marking menus correctly and they can be key to Maya's UI and
usability.
Agree. I find Maya much slower than SI workflow wise, but
Like!! hahaha
Blame the driver not the car for those closures...
On 1/6/2014 10:49 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Stefan Kubicek s...@tidbit-images.com wrote:
Is it just my biased point of view that all studios that closed or filed for
bancruptcy last year were
Hey all,
I'm able to export nurbs curves from Softimage to Maya using FBX but am
unable to go the other way. Any ideas on how to go about it?
Thanks,
Eric T.
If you can switch to using Alembic instead of FBX, you can use
Exocortex Crate to go back and forth I believe.
-ben
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@hybride.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'm able to export nurbs curves from Softimage to Maya using FBX but am
unable to go the
In Soft, select the objects you want to send to Maya, then execute
Send To maya-Send as new Maya Scene
Does that work?
If you don't select all the objects, I've seen it randomly select the objects
it will send. Its kind of strange though, some primitives do not always go to
maya as
Yeah I'll check that out. Don't have Maya setup to load the create
suite right now.
Thanks Ben,
Eric T.
On Monday, January 06, 2014 12:21:28 PM, Ben Houston wrote:
If you can switch to using Alembic instead of FBX, you can use
Exocortex Crate to go back and forth I believe.
-ben
On Mon, Jan
HI Eric,
Be sure to have both apps open before using 'send to'.
There's a glitch opening the FBX on the other side when you don't have
both apps open.
It's a known 'issue'
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 6-1-2014 18:45, Eric Thivierge wrote:
Hey Joey,
Yeah I tried that but
Thanks. I have both open and then for some reason it launches two new
Softimage instances... not sure what the deal is... will continue to
tinker.
On Monday, January 06, 2014 12:54:16 PM, Rob Wuijster wrote:
HI Eric,
Be sure to have both apps open before using 'send to'.
There's a glitch
It's a simple question of what is the expected result.
Should the tangents and bitangents stay oriented relative to the mesh, or
should they stay put in world space and acknowledge the transformation of the
object? My code is working under the assumption of the former, ultimapper is
giving
In some version of the suite, it will fail on its ass if both apps are
not installed on the C: drive.
try also .iges
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@hybride.com wrote:
Thanks. I have both open and then for some reason it launches two new
Softimage instances... not sure
Yeah they are on our D drives... blah.
Doesn't the Send To functions just use the FBX format anyway?
On Monday, January 06, 2014 1:40:13 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
In some version of the suite, it will fail on its ass if both apps are
not installed on the C: drive.
try also .iges
On Mon,
What does xnormal do for two meshes with non-zero transforms?
Out of a gut feeling, I would say that a tangent space normal map should
be independent of an object´s world space transformation, because if it
where dependent on that worldspace position, it would degrade the tangent
space map into
OK, so what I'm hearing is we both agree ultimapper is wrong. That's what I
needed to know.
I'll file a bug on ultimapper and proceed under the assumption my code is
correct.
Thanks.
As for looking up a normal on a high res mesh from a low res mesh, ultimapper
is using raycast along the low
what do you guys think about this blog post:
http://mayavxsi.blogspot.com/2011/09/rigging-m-22-x-15.html
oh my god, get ready for every 'point' being argued.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau luceri...@gmail.comwrote:
what do you guys think about this blog post:
http://mayavxsi.blogspot.com/2011/09/rigging-m-22-x-15.html
I saw that a long time ago (its from 2011) and was very upset when it
was sent around as it is obviously not done by someone who really
understands both systems. It's a shame it's even posted for public
consumption. I'm a hater on the general workflow clunkiness of Maya but
giving it a fair
It is so embarrassing to read I can't pass the third paragraph, but that is
what happens when you see someone that knows so little about one piece of
software and feels has the the authority to throw his opinion on the internet.
ahhh… now I am going to have to answer him.
Jordi Bares
Simon says.. What?? ;-)
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 6-1-2014 21:13, Steven Caron wrote:
oh my god, get ready for every 'point' being argued.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau
luceri...@gmail.com mailto:luceri...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you guys think
i have only skimmed this but he has arbitrary decisions when to give one
app a 'point' and when to 'dock a point'.
he docks a point because he doesn't like the floating property pages then
adds a point later because he likes it (two explorers to drag and drop).
@luc-eric, please please don't
*The time that Maya saves with its rigging technology and superior
workflow, outweighs the additional cost.*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
I saw this a long ago and not then not now it makes any sense at all..
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Steven Caron car...@gmail.com wrote:
i have only skimmed this
What I find highly offensive is that the author left out any of their
qualifications or contact information...
I think it's Simon Payne.
you can read his bio at the bottom right here (scroll all the way down)
http://cmivfx.com/store/495-Creature+Creators+Handbook+Volume+01
i have only skimmed
It reads like a maya evangelist tried XSI/Softimage for a first time and
beeing disappointed because it's different in getting thing done.
[Quote]: ...If [Maya] costs 40% more,... you can do more advanced
characters, with less bugs, in half the time, then choosing XSI for
Characters is in fact a
Over the years I've stopped looking at rigging as just a collection of
joints, iks, and constraints. There's an overarching support toolset that
needs to be in place to manage rigs and animation data that needs to be
part of the equation too. From the maya side, I miss stuff like the Mixer
and
For flexibility and workflow, Maya wins the blendshape *point* by quite a
distance.
I call shenanigans. lol -- Last time I tried to make a corrective shape in
Maya *while in the same pose* using what's in the box, I wanted to shoot
myself in the foot.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Mirko
Last paragraph needs to be framed and hung on the wall. :P
On Monday, January 06, 2014 3:47:41 PM, Meng-Yang Lu wrote:
These days, I think rigging has gotten so sophisticated that the stuff
he's comparing only accounts for about 40 percent of the rigging
process. There's a hefty 70 percent
I would say 1% got discussed and very badly discussed.
Regarding rigging I remember once a very senior rigger throwing tons of cr@p in
the rig and I had to sit down and re-rig it in front of him and actually
_prove_ him you could do the same with just a tenth of the bones and controls.
The
Very much so on framing that quote. I think its most telling that out of all
of the maya vs xsi pieces he created (7) he only posted one.
We no longer teach rigging in our animation course as it has just become too
time consuming to get people new to 3D to understand it decently (our course is
Depends how many Animators I have to deal with... :P
On Monday, January 06, 2014 4:24:39 PM, Angus Davidson wrote:
Rigging has become such a specialized field that its both very scary for new
people , and I can only hope also very rewarding for those people who have the
dedication and drive
HAHAHAHAHA!
What a farce.
On 1/6/2014 1:46 PM, Alan Fregtman wrote:
For flexibility and workflow, Maya wins the blendshape *point* by
quite a distance.
I call shenanigans. lol -- Last time I tried to make a corrective
shape in Maya *while in the same pose* using what's in the box, I
Hi
We use Species here for ease and speed. So the head and jaw have their
deformers, and the facial expressions are done through Shapes on a FaceRig
panel. For some time now the animator wants some additional Facial controls
so he isn't restricted by the range of the shapes. And he wants something
That's funny. A few months ago, when I started rigging in Soft, I
was googling a lot of information and pestering this list (trying to
keep the hair loss to a minimum, you know...), and I landed on this
article. I read it through and through and thought some things were
Hi having a strange issue with Facerobot
I'm rigging the same face with both Gear and Facerobot to see which one is
the best solution for my needs, I'm following the videotutorials on youtube
from SoftimageHowsTo and I would like to paint the wrinkle maps
As soon as I choose to do wrinkle paint
So what does maya rigging tools have that Softimage doesn't that makes a
significant difference at the end of the day?
Matt
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Steven Caron
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 1:58 PM
To:
I think I had the same issue once.
It may have been due to topo edits combined with a 'freeze/freezeM I may have
done.
I realized the problem and reverted to a previous scene.
Manny Papamanos
Product Support Specialist
Americas Frontline Technical Support
From:
Perhaps deform by volume?
This doesn't deal with weight though but can be flexible since you can
interactively mod the radius on the volume deformers.
Manny Papamanos
Product Support Specialist
Americas Frontline Technical Support
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
In my opinion the only thing I would love to have from maya is the ability to
get deformation from objects vertices rather than object centres so you can
build pseudo-muscles easily.
The whole muscle system would be nice but it is not critical imho given that I
am of the opinion that the
are you asking me personally?
i think some studios might favor the dependency graph structure of maya for
custom nodes and behaviors. they would choose that over the better
initially organized softimage environment which lacks some customization
options that maya has. a topic discussed to death
What does XSI users use for skin simulation these days? All custom stuff
in ICE? We've been leveraging nCloth quite a bit lately and arguably, it's
the only piece of tech that 3D peeps here regardless of app preference can
unanimously agree that it is indeed pretty good. Maybe not significant
Open question to anybody with significant experience in both Softimage and maya.
I have to address some envelope and rigging tools internally pretty soon.
Having this discussion now is convenience for me.
Matt
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
I found that the biggest problems in rigging are management issues:
listening and weighing input, absorbing unexpected changes gracefully, and
finding solutions that fit into a much larger pipeline over which you have
limited control. Rarely are you even in a position to dictate the software,
it's
Well.. I really hope that Fabric Engine will be our fixing solution.
I think both SI and Maya way of handling solvers/gizmos ect are bit sloppy
compaired to Fabric... n slow.. : )
On 7 January 2014 00:30, Ben Barker ben.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that the biggest problems in rigging are
Let me narrow down the question to the specific task of applying an envelope or
weighting/re-weighting an envelope.
Matt
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Matt Lind
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:27 PM
To:
agreed...
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Ben Barker ben.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Like all things, it always comes back to people.
Arguments are good. That's where the truth comes out from having to prove a
point one way or another.
We need to do simulation too, but mostly for clothing or tapestries. The hard
part for us is getting the motion to look natural and meaningful, but also loop
seamlessly over a short duration
I'll definitely get back to you on this one tomorrow.
On 06/01/2014 5:36 PM, Matt Lind wrote:
Let
me narrow down the question to the specific task of applying
an envelope or weighting/re-weighting an
I think different ways of calculating the influence is probably the highest
hurdle right now. The default calculations get you a good starting point
but there are the other heat map methods and another voxel based one I saw
a vimeo video on that are going to get you much closer than our current
You mean like the one that inspired the Maya tool? ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=f7bmBOcLjGg
available at http://rray.de/xsi/ scroll to bottom and search for Draw
Bones Inside Mesh
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@gmail.com wrote:
I think
It's called the Component Editor. Does the same thing. However, XSI lets
you slide the weights around until it feels right. Beats typing it in.
I just remembered a pretty silly conversation involving a rigging supe and
an XSI developer regarding locking weights. It was like the only crutch to
quoted from the blog
I hope you can tell from the above thorough comparisons and analysis, why
it is the case however, that Maya reigns dominant in this subject. As you
can see by the detail I have provided here, it is academic, and nothing to
do with personal preference
so there you go then! :)
All well and good but I'd prefer it to be built in and supported by the dev
team. Less reliability on 3rd party to fix things when production needs a
fix. (Yeah I know I'm one to talk about 3rd party tools...). Lots of these
nice tools have been made by individuals who drop off the face of the
Have you tried the old but sometimes workable IGES?
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@hybride.comwrote:
Yeah they are on our D drives... blah.
Doesn't the Send To functions just use the FBX format anyway?
On Monday, January 06, 2014 1:40:13 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau
True, too true...but I was a bit cheesed off to hear Maya touting it as a
new feature when Soft had it as a 3rd party tool before hand.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@gmail.com wrote:
All well and good but I'd prefer it to be built in and supported by the
dev team.
Even if not an original feature, it is new to the application... typically
what I think they mean by new feature. :)
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Eric Turman i.anima...@gmail.com wrote:
True, too
All well and good but I'd prefer it to be built in and supported by the dev
team. Less reliability on 3rd party to fix things when production needs a
fix. (Yeah I know I'm one to talk about 3rd party tools...). Lots of these
nice tools have been made by individuals who drop off the face of the
Interested in getting back into Softimage as a small side project there
Luc-Eric and getting us a draw bone inside mesh tool? :D
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau luceri...@gmail.comwrote:
heck, I can't even run XSI anymore, I'm on a mac now.
I have two side projects that need diaper changes.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@gmail.com wrote:
Interested in getting back into Softimage as a small side project there
Luc-Eric and getting us a draw bone inside
it was just a script... just crack it open and have your way with it
this also sounds like a job for the Custom Tool API... it sounds like you
just want someone else to maintain it ;P
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Eric Thivierge ethivie...@gmail.com wrote:
Interested in getting back into
Truer words have never been spoken. I have enough to maintain. Also I know
not of the C++ and Custom Tool API. :(
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Steven Caron car...@gmail.com wrote:
it sounds like you just
I did something similar https://vimeo.com/6792010 in 2009 inspired by
Blender's etch-a-ton.
https://vimeo.com/album/39155
Just saying :-)
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Eric Turman i.anima...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean like the one that inspired the Maya tool? ;)
heck, I can't even run XSI anymore, I'm on a mac now.
Great stuff! Just port XSI over to OSX then.
Thanks.
On 7 January 2014 11:44, Luc-Eric Rousseau luceri...@gmail.com wrote:
heck, I can't even run XSI anymore, I'm on a mac now.
I have two side projects that need diaper changes.
On Mon,
It is great to have flexibility in the search methods.
I´m familiarizing with xNormal at the moment and just went through the
Normalmap sampling options, e.g. 3x3,5x5 etc. I can´t say I am sure
I have a favourite search method for a specific task or know why, yet.
From my artistic standpoint, I
---
I really suck at the technical side of rigging, which is why I never get to
the point of showing my own characters in motion and I would welcome anything
hat helps me get closer to such a point. From that biased view, I think all
the 3D DCC apps suck in the way they let you create control
On 06.01.2014 16:25, Eric Lampi wrote:
First place I worked at I saw a young woman creative from an agency come into
the 3D area. She was squinting at the monitor and I couldn't tell what she was
looking at, then she
says Oh thank God, they're SGI!.
Eric
I think she liked you.
She
The bigger problem that needs eyes on it is determining how the low res mesh
details correlate to the high res mesh details. Maya uses a cage concept to
limit the search distance, but that doesn't address the issue of finding an
appropriate match for a specific detail common to the two meshes.
The relation between the lowrez and highrez mesh is the responsibility of the
modeler, imho.
Retopo has become a lot easier but shouldn´t be mistaken to be automagic just
because there´s
now several options in various programs to autogenerate some sort of cage
around a mesh.
Of course, it´s
Amen ;)
Although XSi does run incredibly well under bootcamp.
From: Simon Pickard [m...@simonpickard.com]
heck, I can't even run XSI anymore, I'm on a mac now.
Great stuff! Just port XSI over to OSX then.
Thanks.
On 7 January 2014 11:44, Luc-Eric Rousseau
It runs really well under VMware Fusion as well. But that's currently the
only reason Fusion is ever installed on my Mac.
Basically every issue Softimage is facing in that other Softimage is
doomed! thread comes down to the fact it's not native on OSX.
Maybe. :)
On 7 January 2014 16:28,
Have to concur with that last paragraph ;)
From: Simon Pickard [m...@simonpickard.com]
Sent: 07 January 2014 07:43 AM
To: Xsi Mailing List
Subject: Re: rigging in xsi vs maya
It runs really well under VMware Fusion as well. But that's currently the only
reason
IMHO the article denotes a guy that simply was overwhelmed with SI and was
frightened by his own paradigm.
Of course I have also my own paradigm and the few times before these SI AD
doomsdays that I tried Maya, never could be inside of it for more than 30
minutes to figure out its phylosophy
97 matches
Mail list logo
