Re: Is it safe to use Firefox v61's places.sqlite in old SeaMonkey v2.49.4 web browser?

On 08/21/2018 01:19 AM, Ant wrote: Or are they incompatible? If it is incompatible, is there a way to downgrade this file to make it compatible without losing its datas? Caution: I use SeaMonkey/2.49.1 on Debian, but have never used Firefox. If Firefox has a save bookmarks as HTML option there

Re: Is it safe to use Firefox v61's places.sqlite in old SeaMonkey v2.49.4 web browser?

Not possible. Format changed too much after 55. It will be flagged as corrupt. In theory the last good backup will then be imported and the db initialized. Might still be possible with 2.53 but there were some changes afterwards too. Ant wrote: Or are they incompatible? If it is incompatible,

Is it safe to use Firefox v61's places.sqlite in old SeaMonkey v2.49.4 web browser?

Or are they incompatible? If it is incompatible, is there a way to downgrade this file to make it compatible without losing its datas? -- "They are like the ant... They start one way and turn around and go the other way... They look all the time at the ground and never see the sky." --Davi

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Le 22 février 2016, WaltS48 a écrit : On 02/22/2016 05:05 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: The only nuisance is Google Docs complaining about a too old browser, and this warning keeps showing because I've set Google cookies to expire at the end of sessions... What do you do when you can't use the

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Luc Lalonde wrote on 19/02/2016 17:35: On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 9:34:16 AM UTC-5, Ray_Net wrote: Lucas Levrel wrote on 19/02/2016 12:01: Le 17 février 2016, Luc Lalonde a écrit : However, because of delays in 2.4x, we're getting repeated warnings that Seamonkey 2.39 is old and that we

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 19 février 2016, Ray_Net a écrit : Lucas Levrel wrote on 19/02/2016 12:01: However I'm running 2.12.1, maybe the banner didn't even exist back then ;-) (You have a too old version, so you need those settings, but it's a very bad idea to no upgradre) Hehe, I knew

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

On 02/22/2016 05:05 AM, Lucas Levrel wrote: Le 19 février 2016, Ray_Net a écrit : Lucas Levrel wrote on 19/02/2016 12:01: However I'm running 2.12.1, maybe the banner didn't even exist back then ;-) (You have a too old version, so you need those settings, but it's a very bad idea to no

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Le 19 février 2016, Ray_Net a écrit : Lucas Levrel wrote on 19/02/2016 12:01: However I'm running 2.12.1, maybe the banner didn't even exist back then ;-) (You have a too old version, so you need those settings, but it's a very bad idea to no upgradre) Hehe, I knew I would get this

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

On 20/02/2016 1:31 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Daniel wrote on 19/02/2016 06:32: On 19/02/2016 10:01 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Luc Lalonde wrote on 18/02/2016 02:38: No, the message comes directly from the Seamonkey application Here's a screenshot:

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Luc Lalonde wrote on 18/02/2016 02:38: No, the message comes directly from the Seamonkey application Here's a screenshot: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32164002/Seamonkey-update-message.JPG If you have this banner, your SM version must be very old I don't beleive that you are

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning updates disabled)

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Luc Lalonde wrote: No, the message comes directly from the Seamonkey application Here's a screenshot: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32164002/Seamonkey-update-message.JPG Please bottom-post in this forum, thanks. Weird, since there is no later release. What

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

On 18-2-2016 02:38, Luc Lalonde wrote: > No, the message comes directly from the Seamonkey application > > Here's a screenshot: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32164002/Seamonkey-update-message.JPG It's strange that you get an English warning message, while you have a French copy of

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Luc Lalonde wrote: No, the message comes directly from the Seamonkey application Here's a screenshot: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32164002/Seamonkey-update-message.JPG Please bottom-post in this forum, thanks. Weird, since there is no later release. What happens if you click the

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

No, the message comes directly from the Seamonkey application Here's a screenshot: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/32164002/Seamonkey-update-message.JPG On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 6:49:42 PM UTC-5, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Luc Lalonde wrote: > > > Hey Folks, > > > > I use

Re: How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Luc Lalonde wrote: Hey Folks, I use Seamonkey in a ThinApp for an in-house application. For this reason, I've disabled the automatic updates. However, because of delays in 2.4x, we're getting repeated warnings that Seamonkey 2.39 is old and that we should update (Ominous, red banner warning

How to disable old Seamonkey version warning (automatic updates disabled)

Hey Folks, I use Seamonkey in a ThinApp for an in-house application. For this reason, I've disabled the automatic updates. However, because of delays in 2.4x, we're getting repeated warnings that Seamonkey 2.39 is old and that we should update (Ominous, red banner warning ;-). How would one

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/6/2016 6:34 PM, G. Ross wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/6/2016 3:32 PM, rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

Is automatically check for updates enabled in the profile? If not just use Help -> Check for Updates and see if the error goes away. Btw. Candidate builds for 2.40 are out. These are practically the final builds just not pushed to the release servers. You can manually update.

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

EE wrote: rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I select just one of the five, I get an error banner that says: "Your

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

Lee wrote: On 2/6/16, David E. Ross wrote: On 2/6/2016 6:34 PM, G. Ross wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 2/6/2016 3:32 PM, rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: <.. snip ..> Do you have SeaMonkey as your home page? Rodney No. I set a preference to export my

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I select just one of the five, I get an error banner that says: "Your copy of

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

On 2/7/2016 3:49 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > Is automatically check for updates enabled in the profile? If not just use > Help -> > Check for Updates and see if the error goes away. > > Btw. Candidate builds for 2.40 are out. These are practically the final > builds > just not pushed to

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

On 2/6/16, David E. Ross wrote: > On 2/6/2016 6:34 PM, G. Ross wrote: >> David E. Ross wrote: >>> On 2/6/2016 3:32 PM, rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: <.. snip ..> Do you have SeaMonkey as your home page? Rodney >>> No. I set a preference to

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

rodney wrote on 2/7/2016 4:05 PM: EE wrote: rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I select just one of the five, I get

"Old" SeaMonkey

Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I select just one of the five, I get an error banner that says: "Your copy of SeaMonkey is old and probably has

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

On 06/02/2016 20:50, David E. Ross wrote: > Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 > SeaMonkey/2.39 > > I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I > select just one of the five, I get an error banner that says:

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I select just one of the five, I get an error banner that says: "Your copy of SeaMonkey is

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

On 2/6/2016 12:19 PM, Mason83 wrote: > On 06/02/2016 20:50, David E. Ross wrote: >> Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 >> SeaMonkey/2.39 >> >> I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I >> select just one of

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

On 2/6/2016 6:34 PM, G. Ross wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 2/6/2016 3:32 PM, rodney wrote: >>> David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

David E. Ross wrote: On 2/6/2016 3:32 PM, rodney wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.39 I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I select just one of the five, I

Re: "Old" SeaMonkey

On 2/6/2016 3:32 PM, rodney wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> Windows 7 Ultimate SP 1 (x64) >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 >> SeaMonkey/2.39 >> >> I have only one installation of SeaMonkey with five profiles. When I >> select just one of the five, I get an

Re: Warning: Old SeaMonkey

On 9/29/2014 5:20 PM, NoOp wrote: On 09/29/2014 03:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 I have four SeaMonkey profiles, one of which is intended for guests to use. When that profile is launched, there is a

Warning: Old SeaMonkey

Windows 7 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 I have four SeaMonkey profiles, one of which is intended for guests to use. When that profile is launched, there is a red bar just above the view port with the message Your copy of SeaMonkey is old and

Re: Warning: Old SeaMonkey

On 09/29/2014 03:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Windows 7 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 I have four SeaMonkey profiles, one of which is intended for guests to use. When that profile is launched, there is a red bar just above the view port

Re: indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

Ant wrote, On 11/23/2013 06:31 AM: On 11/21/2013 11:10 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: What is indexDB, what happened, and are these safe to nuke? Thank you in advance. :) (...) In other words, it's a database server inside your browser, available to web applications, accessible via JavaScript.

Re: indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

On 11/30/2013 9:03 AM PT, sean nathan typed: What is indexDB, what happened, and are these safe to nuke? Thank you in advance. :) (...) In other words, it's a database server inside your browser, available to web applications, accessible via JavaScript. Interesting. Why the heck did that

Re: indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

On 11/21/2013 11:10 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: What is indexDB, what happened, and are these safe to nuke? Thank you in advance. :) (...) In other words, it's a database server inside your browser, available to web applications, accessible via JavaScript. Interesting. Why the heck did that

Re: indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

Ant wrote: On 11/18/2013 9:32 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: What is indexDB, what happened, and are these safe to nuke? Thank you in advance. :) (...) In other words, it's a database server inside your browser, available to web applications, accessible via JavaScript. Interesting. Why the heck

Re: indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

On 11/18/2013 9:32 AM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: What is indexDB, what happened, and are these safe to nuke? Thank you in advance. :) Quoting from https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/IndexedDB: IndexedDB is an API for client-side storage of significant amounts of structured data and for high

Re: indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

Ant wrote: What is indexDB, what happened, and are these safe to nuke? Thank you in advance. :) Quoting from https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/IndexedDB: IndexedDB is an API for client-side storage of significant amounts of structured data and for high performance searches on this data

indexedDB in my over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile?

Hello. Last night, I noticed oddities in my old over year old SeaMonkey v2.22's profile: Volume in drive C is c Volume Serial Number is foo-bar Directory of C:\Documents and Settings\user\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\NumbersAndLetters.sm2.10.1andNewer\indexedDB 11/12

Re: Is it safe to use old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's uninstaller to remove it and not touch v2.11?

Ant wrote, On 07/08/2012 05:50: Hi! I think it is time to dump my outdated, v2.0.14 soon. May I safely use its uninstaller in Windows XP Pro. SP3 and 64-bit W7 HPE? This includes deleting the old profiles. I currently have two different profiles and SM installation directories/folders for

Re: Is it safe to use old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's uninstaller to remove it and not touch v2.11?

On 8/7/2012 12:03 AM PT, Ray_Net typed: Add/Remove Programs will just uninstall SM - The profiles are not touched. Thanks. I will do that later then! -- Ants live safely till they have gotten wings. --unknown /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \

Is it safe to use old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's uninstaller to remove it and not touch v2.11?

Hi! I think it is time to dump my outdated, v2.0.14 soon. May I safely use its uninstaller in Windows XP Pro. SP3 and 64-bit W7 HPE? This includes deleting the old profiles. I currently have two different profiles and SM installation directories/folders for both versions (v2.10.1 was

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Jens Hatlak wrote: ... Yes, as always, all currently known vulnerabilities are fixed in the current stable release, Hmmm. That is quite a broad and strong statement ! :) Well, at least all the ones listed in the list I pointed to. :) Robert

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Daniel schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Jens Hatlak wrote: ... Yes, as always, all currently known vulnerabilities are fixed in the current stable release, Hmmm. That is quite a broad and strong statement ! :) Well, at least all the ones listed in the list I

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Jens Hatlak wrote: ... Yes, as always, all currently known vulnerabilities are fixed in the current stable release, Hmmm. That is quite a broad and strong statement ! :) Well, at least all the ones

libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Hello. In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Libra and I would like to know if Seamonkey 2.0.14 has this libpng graphic vulnerabilities? Thank you in advance. :) -- If I want to be a robber, I rob the king's treasury. If I want to be a hunter, I hunt the

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 11:24, Ant told the world: Hello. In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Libra and I would like to know if Seamonkey 2.0.14 has this libpng graphic vulnerabilities? Thank you in advance. :) Error: Either this forum does not

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

On 2/22/2012 5:35 AM PT, MCBastos typed: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Libra and I would like to know if Seamonkey 2.0.14 has this libpng graphic vulnerabilities? Thank you in advance. :) Error: Either this forum does not exist, or it is members only!

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does not exist, or it is members only! Could you please offer a link to a publicly-available reference to what exactly is this vulnerability? Publicly available here; perhaps you

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 12:34, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does not exist, or it is members only! Could you please offer a link to a publicly-available reference to

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Ant wrote: Hello. In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Libra and I would like to know if Seamonkey 2.0.14 has this libpng graphic vulnerabilities? Thank you in advance. :) I can confirm the vulnerability exists in 2.0.14. We will not be releasing a new

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

On 2/22/2012 7:39 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Libra and I would like to know if Seamonkey 2.0.14 has this libpng graphic vulnerabilities? I can confirm the vulnerability exists in 2.0.14. We will not be releasing a

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: But the current version of SM is 2.7.2 Have these vulnerabilities been eliminated IN THE CURRENT VERSION of SM ??? http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.7/changes#fixesP2 https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey.html It's all

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 12:34, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does not exist, or it is members only! Could you please offer a link to a publicly-available

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Jens Hatlak wrote: ... Yes, as always, all currently known vulnerabilities are fixed in the current stable release, HTH Jens Hmmm. That is quite a broad and strong statement ! :) -- Rostyk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 12:34, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does not exist, or it is members only! Could you please offer a

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Jens Hatlak wrote: ... Yes, as always, all currently known vulnerabilities are fixed in the current stable release, Hmmm. That is quite a broad and strong statement ! :) Well, at least all the ones listed in the list I pointed to. :) Robert Kaiser

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

WLS wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 12:34, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does not exist, or it is members only! Could you

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

On 02/22/2012 08:28 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: WLS wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 12:34, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

On 02/22/2012 05:28 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: WLS wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 22/02/2012 12:34, Philip TAYLOR told the world: MCBastos wrote: In http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- security forum thread, Error: Either this forum does

Re: libpng graphics library vulnerabilities in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 web browser?

On 02/22/2012 06:31 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Or enclose in : http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26922231- Does that work? But that probably wouldn't work on a url that wraps. Such as: http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/iPod-Touch-2nd-Generation-Battery-Replacement/1131/1 The URL on the newsgroup

Is return receipts broken in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's e-mail client?

I just noticed my sent e-mails, with return receipts request, don't ask/send an e-mail (assuming not ignored) for it even to myself. What's up? Thank you in advance. :) -- ... Our latest evil plan and create an army of giant ants to take over the galaxy... --Dark Helmet from Spaceballs: The

Re: Is return receipts broken in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's e-mail client?

Ant wrote: I just noticed my sent e-mails, with return receipts request, don't ask/send an e-mail (assuming not ignored) for it even to myself. What's up? Please describe your settings in: Mail Newsgroups - Return Receipts My email clients will never respond to your receipt request. The

Re: Is return receipts broken in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's e-mail client?

On 11/23/2011 7:56 AM PT, Beauregard T. Shagnasty typed: I just noticed my sent e-mails, with return receipts request, don't ask/send an e-mail (assuming not ignored) for it even to myself. What's up? Please describe your settings in: Mail Newsgroups - Return Receipts My email clients will

Re: Is return receipts broken in old SeaMonkey v2.0.14's e-mail client?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Ant wrote: I just noticed my sent e-mails, with return receipts request, don't ask/send an e-mail (assuming not ignored) for it even to myself. What's up? Please describe your settings in: Mail Newsgroups - Return Receipts My email clients will never respond

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Ant wrote: Can I do it in reversed. Since I already have v2.0.14 installed with its installer, can I download and extract v2.3+ and then copy my old SM2.0.14 profile into this v2.3+ folder/directory? Will it still import my old data files (bookmarks.html, *.mab addressbooks, histories,

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/4/2011 4:04 PM PT, Robert Kaiser typed: Ant schrieb: v2.3.3?! Sheesh! What is it now? A tiny update to fix that 2.3.2 is mis-reporting the version number as 2.3.1 and also correcting more late fall-out from the DigiNotar certificate problem.

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/1/2011 12:36 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed: ... Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) Separate install is fine, you *cannot* reuse the same profile between both versions without corruption though. 2.0.14-later should

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/1/2011 7:44 AM PT, PhillipJones typed: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works just fine. I cannot say the same will be true for any

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Ant schreef: On 9/1/2011 7:44 AM PT, PhillipJones typed: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works just fine. I cannot say the same will be true for any

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/4/2011 9:33 AM PT, Zanqeutil typed: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works just fine. I cannot say the same will be true for any extensions/themes

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/4/2011 9:17 AM, Ant wrote: On 9/1/2011 12:36 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed: So My recommendation (if you have ANY intent/chance you'll revert): * Backup your _profile_ folder * Use help-Check for updates... download/install any update offers, repeat. * You should now be on 2.3.2

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Ant schrieb: v2.3.3?! Sheesh! What is it now? A tiny update to fix that 2.3.2 is mis-reporting the version number as 2.3.1 and also correcting more late fall-out from the DigiNotar certificate problem. http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/09/02/diginotar-removal-follow-up/ has more

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 8/31/2011 9:48 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed: ... Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) Separate install is fine, you *cannot* reuse the same profile between both versions without corruption though. 2.0.14-later should

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 8/31/2011 9:37 PM PT, Sailfish typed: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works just fine. I cannot say the same will be true for any extensions/themes

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Ant schrieb: Updater tells me v2.2. Is it not out yet or do I need to wait again? Callek might not have shipped the direct major updates from 2.0.14 to 2.3.x yet, so go to 2.2 with this, and then update once again to 2.3.2 (which reports as 2.3.1 but is fine in every other respect). From

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what Ant graced us with on 8/31/2011 9:31 PM: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works just fine. I cannot

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Ant wrote: ... Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? You can have as many versions of Mozilla apps as you have HDD space for. Once while trying to find the date and time of a bug insertion I had about 20 SM versions, all using the same profile. I

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

My bloviated meandering follows what PhillipJones graced us with on 9/1/2011 7:44 AM: Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what Ant graced us with on 8/31/2011 9:31 PM: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

PhillipJones wrote: Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what Ant graced us with on 8/31/2011 9:31 PM: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what PhillipJones graced us with on 9/1/2011 7:44 AM: Sailfish wrote: My bloviated meandering follows what Ant graced us with on 8/31/2011 9:31 PM: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/1/2011 8:33 AM, Ant wrote: On 8/31/2011 9:48 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed: ... Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) Separate install is fine, you *cannot* reuse the same profile between both versions without

OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

... Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) -- You're kissing an ant hill. --Mike Nelson /\___/\ Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

My bloviated meandering follows what Ant graced us with on 8/31/2011 9:31 PM: Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) You can have separation installation folders for SeaMonkey and it works just fine. I cannot say the same

Re: OK, I think I am ready to upgrade my old SeaMonkey v2.0.14 to the latest ...

On 9/1/2011 12:31 AM, Ant wrote: ... Can I do a separate installation of SM2, or does it have to be over v2.0.14? Thank you in advance. :) Separate install is fine, you *cannot* reuse the same profile between both versions without corruption though. 2.0.14-later should work just fine (there

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:07:07 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: stevesteve schrieb: Please how do I get my old version of SeaMonkey back!? I updated to v2.2 in good faith. The new version is a nightmare. Have you tried to right-click? All I want to do is copy-paste and spell check, all I get is a

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Philip Chee schrieb: There are at least two bugs filed, but IanN and by Neil. No need to file another one. It appears to be a core XUL bug. Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine -

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with Mozilla-based programs. Don't

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT), /Paul/: On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:16:08 +0200, Robert Kaiser wrote: Philip Chee schrieb: There are at least two bugs filed, but IanN and by Neil. No need to file another one. It appears to be a core XUL bug. Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Paul wrote: On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with Mozilla-based

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

PhillipJones wrote: Paul wrote: On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote: Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to work around on 2.3 or so. I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the problems. If I lose data, I'm done with

I want my old Seamonkey back

Please how do I get my old version of SeaMonkey back!? I updated to v2.2 in good faith. The new version is a nightmare. Have you tried to right-click? All I want to do is copy-paste and spell check, all I get is a laundry list of useless (to me) functions. And what is the extra addition to the

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

stevesteve wrote: Please how do I get my old version of SeaMonkey back!? I updated to v2.2 in good faith. The new version is a nightmare. Have you tried to right-click? All I want to do is copy-paste and spell check, all I get is a laundry list of useless (to me) functions. And what is the

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

stevesteve schrieb: Please how do I get my old version of SeaMonkey back!? I updated to v2.2 in good faith. The new version is a nightmare. Have you tried to right-click? All I want to do is copy-paste and spell check, all I get is a laundry list of useless (to me) functions. Every time I

Re: I want my old Seamonkey back

Rob, and others, it's apparently not as easy to go back to an earlier SM as you think. Here's part of what I posted on another thread: Looks like I can't go back to SM 2.0.18 (I think it was) which is what I was using before. The 'Known Issues' note for SM 2.2 is headed (in bold), 'Data

Re: Revert To Old SeaMonkey

Jim S wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT), Jimmy Lee wrote: Hello all. I am a SeaMonkey user since day 1. Just recently started biting me in the buttocks with v2. Is it possible to go back to version 1.x of SeaMonkey? I upgraded to v2 but it is just not working for me. Constant

Re: Revert To Old SeaMonkey

On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:05:54 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Jim S wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:34:10 -0700 (PDT), Jimmy Lee wrote: Hello all. I am a SeaMonkey user since day 1. Just recently started biting me in the buttocks with v2. Is it possible to go back to version 1.x of SeaMonkey? I

  1   2   >