> Hi guys!
> I finally built a new (21st century) PC and installed my last registered
> copy of TheBat! (version 2.12) on it.
> Everything's great thanks, except I need to enter my registration code and
> of course I do not have a copy!
> Can anyone please tell me how to retrie
Hi guys!
I finally built a new (21st century) PC and installed my last registered
copy of TheBat! (version 2.12) on it.
Everything's great thanks, except I need to enter my registration code and
of course I do not have a copy!
Can anyone please tell me how to retrieve my registration?
Thanks so
Op donderdag 1 oktober 2015, 22:29:23, schreef Richie G:
> Everything's great thanks, except I need to enter my registration code and
> of course I do not have a copy!
> Can anyone please tell me how to retrieve my registration?
In case your old system is still running, you can cop
on the original installation of v5.2 by the way.
Curiously, and this may explain why I had been having the first 56
characters appear in the registration box, when I went to register I
copied the key block into the clipboard and did HELP/ENTER
REGISTRATION CODE and a message immediately popped up thanking
10/11/2014 10:03 AM
Hi Jack,
On 10/11/2014 Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL The next thing I deleted was MaAfee firewall/anti-virus
JSL (after first turning off the WIFI). Voila! No more problems with TB.
JSL I downloaded installed AVG anti-virus and turned on Windows firewall
JSL to compensate
with the key block provided by
RIT Labs. The same key block I had saved on the original
installation of v5.2 by the way.
Glad to hear you got it working.
Curiously, and this may explain why I had been having
the first 56 characters appear in the registration box,
when I went to register I
10/11/2014 11:29 AM
Hi MFPA,
On 10/11/2014 MFPA wrote:
M Seems odd that TB! would *assume* you had the registration key on the
M clipboard.
It has been like this for quite some time. It is a great feature!
- --
Paul
The Bat! v.6.6.0.3 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601
No IMAP No OTFE
installing new software.
Curiously, and this may explain why I had been having the first 56
characters appear in the registration box, when I went to register
I copied the key block into the clipboard and did HELP/ENTER
REGISTRATION CODE and a message immediately popped up thanking me
Hello Paul,
Something I learned well over 10 years ago: Get rid of McAfee!
Agree 100%.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v6.6.0.8
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com
Hello Jack,
I may not have phrased that correctly. The Thank you.. message
appeared ONLY after erasing MaAfee and then copying the keyblock into
my clipboard AND THEN calling HELP/ENTER REGISTRATION CODE. It would
seem that TB did in fact *assume* the keyblock existed in the
clipboard
Hello MAU,
On Saturday, October 11, 2014 you wrote:
M Hello Jack,
I may not have phrased that correctly. The Thank you.. message
appeared ONLY after erasing MaAfee and then copying the keyblock into
my clipboard AND THEN calling HELP/ENTER REGISTRATION CODE. It would
seem that TB did
that correctly. The Thank
you.. message appeared ONLY after erasing MaAfee and
then copying the keyblock into my clipboard AND THEN
calling HELP/ENTER REGISTRATION CODE. It would seem
that TB did in fact *assume* the keyblock existed in
the clipboard and grabbed it and verified it before
Hi
On Saturday 11 October 2014 at 5:03:29 PM, in
mid:263719273.20141011180...@gmail.com, MAU wrote:
Actually, if I recall correctly, you don't even need to
copy the keyblock to the clipboard. If you just select
the email with the keyblock, TB will grab it from
there.
That would make
REGISTRATION CODE.
It would seem that TB did in fact *assume* the keyblock existed in
the clipboard and grabbed it and verified it before Thanking me.
Go figure.
M I see. TB! had grabbed it, verified it, and thanked you and
M then displayed the first 56 characters when you were subsequently
M trying
Get rid of McAfee!
No disagreement here :)
Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi
On Tuesday 7 October 2014 at 2:15:59 AM, in
mid:59872763.20141006211...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote:
No kidding... really?
Yes, unless I completely mis-understood what I was reading.
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
Friday, October 3, 2014, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote:
I am seriously considering buying an authorized copy ($99 from Newegg)
of Windows 7 and trashing Windows 8 on this new machine. I will
contact ASUS tech support to see if the machine will even let me do
that.
First thing to do with any new PC
10/6/2014 7:49 AM
Hi MFPA,
On 10/5/2014 MFPA wrote:
M I thought an SSD could be used on any box that can use a SATA disk
M drive, as a drop-in replacement for that drive.
I confused this with ACHI, sorry.
It is needed in Windows 7. See this:
Hello Adrian,
On Monday, October 06, 2014 you wrote:
AG Friday, October 3, 2014, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote:
I am seriously considering buying an authorized copy ($99 from Newegg)
of Windows 7 and trashing Windows 8 on this new machine. I will
contact ASUS tech support to see if the machine will
Hi
On Monday 6 October 2014 at 12:53:53 PM, in
mid:6994081.20141006075...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote:
I have no experience with 32 bit Win 7... See this:
http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/186875-uefi-unified-extensible-firmware-interface-install-windows-7-a.html
I think
10/6/2014 9:15 PM
Hi MFPA,
On 10/6/2014 MFPA wrote:
M I think that's one of the hits on the search results page you posted
M before. It tells you how to install 64-bit Windows 7 using UEFI, but
M does not say you can only install it that way. In fact, if you follow
M from its beginning the
10/5/2014 9:04 AM
Hi MFPA,
On 10/4/2014 MFPA wrote:
M UEFI-mode and Secure Boot in the BIOS are two newish features that
M came out somewhere around the same time as Windows 8. I have not
M encountered them myself, but saw when googling this topic that they
M need to be disabled before
Hello MFPA,
On Sunday, October 05, 2014 you wrote:
M Hi
M On Saturday 4 October 2014 at 4:18:45 PM, in
M mid:23685106.20141004101...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
The desktop I'm using now was purchased from EggHead or
TigerDirect, I don't remember which. It was purchased
as
On Sunday, October 5, 2014, 3:44:47, MFPA wrote:
UEFI-mode and Secure Boot in the BIOS are two newish features that
came out somewhere around the same time as Windows 8. I have not
encountered them myself, but saw when googling this topic that they
need to be disabled before installing
On Sunday, October 5, 2014, 15:11:03, Paul Van Noord wrote:
UEFI mode is needed when using an SSD as a primary drive. It is needed
in Windows 7. See this:
https://www.google.com/#q=uefi+mode+when+installing+windows+7
Nope, I bought my first SSD 2009, but haven't gotten an UEFI-capable
Hi
On Sunday 5 October 2014 at 2:11:03 PM, in
mid:1366095716.20141005091...@for-him.net, Paul Van Noord wrote:
UEFI mode is needed when using an SSD as a primary
drive.
I thought an SSD could be used on any box that can use a SATA disk
drive, as a drop-in replacement for that drive.
Hi
On Friday 3 October 2014 at 10:03:44 PM, in
mid:1542632364.20141003160...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
What with all the bad press Win 8's been getting I
guess that would be an upgrade. I'm not aware of any
offer like that but it certainly would shine MS's image
if they were to
Hello MFPA,
On Saturday, October 04, 2014 you wrote:
M Hi
M Out of curiosity, I did a spot of googling. If the Windows 8
M version has Pro in its name and came pre-installed on the
M computer, the licence apparently includes downgrade rights to
M Windows 7 Professional or Windows Vista
On Friday, October 3, 2014, 22:16:17, MFPA wrote:
Doesn't Microsoft have a semi-official way to upgrade from 8 to 7,
like they did a few years ago for those who wanted to upgrade from
Vista to XP?
OEM installs of Windows 8 Pro can legally downgrade to Windows 7 Pro,
but not Windows 8 (without
Hi
On Saturday 4 October 2014 at 4:18:45 PM, in
mid:23685106.20141004101...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
The desktop I'm using now was purchased from EggHead or
TigerDirect, I don't remember which. It was purchased
as separate components and assembled by me. The HDD
was blank and
Hello Paul,
On Friday, October 03, 2014 you wrote:
JSL In addition, you mentioned the possibility of the anti-virus (McAfee)
JSL hanging up the displaying of some messages when clicked on. As an
JSL experiment, I disabled both the McAfee firewall (for 15 minutes) and
JSL the McAfee anti-virus.
Hello TBUDLs,
I've sent an email to RIT Labs this morning outlining the two major
problems expressed in this thread. I'll keep the list posted as soon
as I hear from them.
--
TIA,
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: Central Alabama
Using The Bat! ver: 5.2.
Running Windows 7 Pro ver 6 build 7601 Service Pack
Hello TBUDLs,
I've received a response from RIT Labs which suggests that the problem
with the key block is that I'm using the wrong key block. They will
re-send the original keyblock for the name and email address I
provided them in the return email I just sent. No mention was made as
to why
Hi
On Friday 3 October 2014 at 5:27:34 PM, in
mid:782170723.20141003112...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I am seriously considering buying an authorized copy
($99 from Newegg) of Windows 7 and trashing Windows 8
on this new machine. I will contact ASUS tech support
to see if the
Hello MFPA,
On Friday, October 03, 2014 you wrote:
M Hi
M On Friday 3 October 2014 at 5:27:34 PM, in
M mid:782170723.20141003112...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I am seriously considering buying an authorized copy
($99 from Newegg) of Windows 7 and trashing Windows 8
on this new
. Maybe that
M would accept your registration key.
I would forever be in your debt if you could send that
to me. It's certainly worth a try. Failing that I'll
contact RIT Labs.
M Sending now, if my server doesn't time out before it completes. So far
M I have managed to send 64% in six minutes
Hello TBUDLs,
I received an email off list from Chris suggesting that I try renaming
CONFIG.CDB to CONFIG.CDB_OLD and letting TB! recreate the file. I did
as suggested and it had absolutely no effect even though TB DID
recreate the file. I then deleted the newly created file and renamed
the
Hi
On Thursday 2 October 2014 at 4:21:29 PM, in
mid:3710284123.20141002102...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Un-fortunately the problem
with the key block is still there. The first 56
characters of the block are there as soon as I open the
registration dialog box. And again, deleting
is about 16MB. No guarantees its any good,
M but I could send it to you if you want. Maybe that
M would accept your registration key.
I would forever be in your debt if you could send that
to me. It's certainly worth a try. Failing that I'll
contact RIT Labs.
M Sending now, if my server doesn't
. No delay this time.
There doesn't seem to be any pattern to this, it appears to be
completely random.
2) The key block I saved from her original installation of 5.2 is not
being accepted by v5.8.8. Curiously, when I click on HELP/ENTER
REGISTRATION CODE the first 56 characters of the 185 character
the Title Bar on TB! windowa as well as most
others.
2) The key block I saved from her original installation
of 5.2 is not being accepted by v5.8.8. Curiously,
when I click on HELP/ENTER REGISTRATION CODE the first
56 characters of the 185 character code appears in the
box where I would
and the
words The Bat! at the far left. The far right has simply the
Minimize, Maximize and X.
2) The key block I saved from her original installation of 5.2 is
not being accepted by v5.8.8. Curiously, when I click on
HELP/ENTER REGISTRATION CODE the first 56 characters of the 185
character
Possibly. Since this a brand new computer I don't really know what AV ASUS
might have running on it. I'll check that.
I get it too. I run windows 8.1 on 2 computers. It was really bad on the older
one with 8 megs of memory but even with 32 megs and a xenon processor it still
happens, although
. No guarantees its any good,
M but I could send it to you if you want. Maybe that
M would accept your registration key.
I would forever be in your debt if you could send that
to me. It's certainly worth a try. Failing that I'll
contact RIT Labs.
Sending now, if my server doesn't time out before
.msi that Windows
M tells me is about 16MB. No guarantees its any good,
M but I could send it to you if you want. Maybe that
M would accept your registration key.
I would forever be in your debt if you could send that
to me. It's certainly worth a try. Failing that I'll
contact RIT Labs
Hi,
You have a v4 key, which is valid for from version 4.0 up to 5.0.99
(which is why it works for 5.0.36.2).
Yes.
Buy an upgrade key to v5, and you'll receive a key that's valid for
versions up to 6.0.99. This is just the way RIT handles registration
keys (there's no time extensions
On 30. avgust 2012, 9:31:22, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Wasn't that changed in the key concept revolution somewhere just
before v5 release? It used to work like this, but didn't they change it
to a subscription model? Or were those plans dropped again?
Those plans were dropped because users
Hi
On Thursday 30 August 2012 at 8:31:22 AM, in
mid:503f16ca.1090...@treadstone79.de, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Wasn't that changed in the key concept revolution
somewhere just before v5 release? It used to work like
this, but didn't they change it to a subscription
model? Or were those plans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
what am I supposed to buy if I want to extend my existing TheBat
registration? My registration data is valid up to and including the
version I'm using now (v5.0.36.2), later versions don't accept this
key anymore.
Is there an update offer
On 29. avgust 2012, 16:04:43, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
what am I supposed to buy if I want to extend my existing TheBat
registration? My registration data is valid up to and including the
version I'm using now (v5.0.36.2), later versions don't accept this
key anymore.
You have a v4 key, which
Hello Roelof,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:35:38 +0200 GMT (18/07/2007, 08:35 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO The only difference between the home and pro versions is that some
RO features are unlocked by the pro license, both use the same
RO executable.
TF Which features would that be?
RO OTFE
Thomas Fernandez @ 2007-7-18 1:39:58 PM
new user registration mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OTFE comes to mind.
I don't like that, because it's a proprietory encryption.
Me too. What if, thirty years from now, Ritlabs has moved on and I
need to get access to *that* message that happens
Hallo Thomas,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:39:58 +0700GMT (18-7-2007, 19:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO The only difference between the home and pro versions is that some
RO features are unlocked by the pro license, both use the same
RO executable.
TF Which features would that be?
RO OTFE
Hello Thomas,
On 2007-07-18 you wrote:
So, unless you want OTFE or need to use Voyager, there are no
unlocked features in the Home version. Or am I wrong?
I think, you're right. There is a pro vs. home section on the Ritlabs
web page:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/diff.php
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:39:50 +0200 GMT (16/07/2007, 12:39 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO The only difference between the home and pro versions is that some
RO features are unlocked by the pro license, both use the same
RO executable.
Which features would that be?
--
Cheers,
Hallo Thomas,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:27:03 +0700GMT (18-7-2007, 3:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO The only difference between the home and pro versions is that some
RO features are unlocked by the pro license, both use the same
RO executable.
TF Which features would that be?
OTFE comes
Hello TBUDL,
I just paid for The Bat Professional version.
I am currently using the Home version.
When I read my email about registering, it registered the Home version
automatically. Is this normal?
What do I need to do to be able to switch from the Home version to the
Professional version?
Brenda @ 2007-7-15 3:51:47 PM
new user registration mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just paid for The Bat Professional version.
I am currently using the Home version.
When I read my email about registering, it registered the Home
version automatically. Is this normal?
Yes. It worked fine to:
X
Hallo Brenda,
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:51:47 -0700GMT (15-7-2007, 21:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
B What do I need to do to be able to switch from the Home version to the
Professional version?
B Did I mess up by accidentally registering my Home version instead of the
Professional version?
Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else,
on 08-Aug-2005 at 00:39 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote:
I was going to find the old account file folder (e.g., the one
labeled John Doe), select it, and then hit Ctrl-C.
Then I was going to find the new account file folder, select it, and
hit
Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else,
on 07-Aug-2005 at 00:57 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote:
Will there be conflicts because of that, if and when I ever do attempt to
re-import the old data into my new version of TB?
If you want to import ONLY the message, no problem.
If you want
On Sunday, August 07, 2005 at 4:45:34 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
You can trust Curtis.
Thanks for the certification. :
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.51.10
System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name
-=-=-
Oxymoron: Steel wool.
Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:45:34 AM, you wrote:
Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else,
on 07-Aug-2005 at 00:57 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote:
Will there be conflicts because of that, if and when I ever do attempt to
re-import the old data into my new version of TB?
If you want
, you'll also restore your old messages (and eventually will find
your original TB registration message).
4.When you found the problematic account, try to remove/rename the
account configuration files (account.xxx) one by one. You will
eventually find the configuration file that is causing
Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else,
on 07-Aug-2005 at 20:14 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote:
And btw. - when you copy the old account folders and their subfolders back
into place, you'll also restore your old messages (and eventually will find
your original TB registration message
(and eventually will find
your original TB registration message).
I assume that just by copying the old account folder (e.g., John
Doe) each account's subfolder(s) will tag a long, right?
If you copy the entire folder, its OK. I thought you might only copy the
single files, that why I mentioned it.
I
registration key. The one I keep filed
away in my EverNote database. It says it doesn't accept keys from
versions 1.XXX or 2.XXX, and requires a newer key. Since I have
uninstalled my old Bat, I can't get to the original e-mail from
Ritlabs that contained my key. I don't even know to which of my
Hello Group
On Saturday, August 6, 2005, 5:11:14 PM, Handsome wrote:
How can I get this resolved?
You need to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you bought it direct. See:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/about/contacts.php?phrase_id=854920
--
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat!
Hello Handsome!
On Saturday, August 06, 2005, 11:11 AM, you wrote:
How can I get this resolved?
RL will sell you a new key, IIRC, for about $3.00, if you have
completely lost your key that you got for 3.xx.
Yes, here's a page link about it:
http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/44/068/article/
Hallo Jack,
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:11:14 -0400GMT (6-8-2005, 18:11 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JM However, it won't accept my registration key.
Did you make a copy of your registry as Thomas and Alexander both
explained?
Now is the time to restore it, as it also contains your registration
Hallo Roelof,
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:39:58 +0200GMT (6-8-2005, 18:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RegistrationBlock
After some testing I found that this is the one you need.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. -
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:23:32 PM, you wrote:
On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:11 -0400, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote:
How can I get this resolved?
You can restore the registry backup you've made, it will contain the
registration information.
But I have to restore all of it or none
Hello Handsome!
On Saturday, August 06, 2005, 12:24 PM, you wrote:
Yes, here's a page link about it:
http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/44/068/article/
I can't say that page helped me, Mary.
Sorry. It says that you should write to Support at The Bat! Tell them
about your purchase of the key from
Hello Handsome!
On Saturday, August 06, 2005, 1:31 PM, you wrote:
Hello Handsome!
Hi, Gorgeous!
Oh, my! You certainly do know the way to the hearts of 78-year-old
women!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, thanks. I just wrote them.
[]
Hope your time-out with beer was a help. :batbeer:
I
Hello Handsome Jack Morrison everyone else,
on 06-Aug-2005 at 20:01 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote:
But only after I drop by my church and say a little prayer.
:-)
So, how are things going? Did you get my PM, and did the restore of the
registration bits from the registry backup work
Hallo Jack,
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:19:39 -0400GMT (6-8-2005, 19:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JM Make another copy of the one I already made a copy of of?
JM Or make a copy of my current (new) one?
Yes, the latter.
When TB doesn't load with the restored registry settings, first
locate
immediately by Split Mode Screen followed by other listings
JM down to the final Zoomed.
That sounds like a registry entry from a system user where The Bat!
had been run but never had the registration applied. It may yet be in
the Users hive of the registry under your own user login. Is it
worth
ON Friday, February 4, 2005, 4:15:28 AM, you wrote:
DC Upgrading is even better right now too, with the 30% offer... I just
DC hope I don't get screwed over on that with CIFNet.
Hi David,
I am nit sure but don't you need your password for the V3 upgrade version to?
This ia a long shot but I
the
pricing came out the same with the 30% off. If it gets him through
this problem, I'm happy to help.
V2 didn't use the password scheme I believe, and V3 uses a Key Block
to register it.
Myself, I keep a .txt file with all my registration information in it for
EVERY program that I register. I
Hello Jerrold Mundis everyone else,
on 04-Feb-2005 at 06:33 you (Jerrold Mundis) wrote:
I used RegEdit on my old drive (contained in an external enclosure,
connected to to my new system by a USB), got to
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The clicked on that folder.
As pointed out by Chris,
Alexander S. Kunz @ 2005-Feb-4 1:19:36 PM
Catch-22, Kafka-esque - Take Your Pick: Can't Get Registration Help
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, you can load registry hives from a dead system into the
live system, this article describes how:
http://www.rwin.ch/xp-live/regedit.htm
VERY, VERY
Hey All,
I finally got my reg code for V3! YAY ME! *coughCough* Sorry
about that. :)
--
Best regards,
David
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hi David,
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, at 19:52:46 [GMT-0500] (which was Sat, 11:52:46
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
Is this the latest release?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Overdrawn? No
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 at 12:02:25 +1100, John Phillips wrote:
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
JP Is this the latest release?
Nope, latest Beta. The latest release is V3.0.1.something.
--
Best regards,
David
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hi
On Saturday 5 February 2005 at 1:02:25 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], John Phillips
wrote:
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10
Is this the latest release?
Current version is 3.0.1.33 according to the footer added to each
message in this list.
3.0.2.10 must be a beta.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
found The Bat! Key I was sent. I have
found The Bat! Checksum I was sent. I have the serial number of my
purchased program -- but what I *don't* have and can't find my is Key
Password from those years ago, and without that TB will not allow me
to execute this 'new registration.'
(My old drive from
the problem?
CIFnet is one clue.
Please keep the password remembered (it was entered by you in the
registration form). is another.
None of the moderators can help - we have no relationship with
RITlabs. CIFnet are a 3rd party reseller, from whom you bought a
licence - RITlabs have no records
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 02:43:59 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Dear Jerrold,
MDP @3-Feb-2005, 21:22 -0500 (04-Feb 02:22 UK time) Jerrold Mundis [JM] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
JM Will one of the moderators -- or anyone with any kind of connection at
JM all with Ritlabs -- please
Dear David,
@3-Feb-2005, 22:03 -0500 (04-Feb 03:03 UK time) David Calvarese [DC]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP CIFnet is one clue.
DC I feel his pain. I'm stuck waiting for CIFNe to process a paypal
DC payment for V3. At least I'm EARLY in my trial period... If it's not
DC
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 at 03:11:10 +, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Dear David,
MDP @3-Feb-2005, 22:03 -0500 (04-Feb 03:03 UK time) David Calvarese [DC]
MDP in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP CIFnet is one clue.
DC I feel his pain. I'm stuck waiting for CIFNe to process a paypal
DC
this as an original registration, paying
whatever license fee is necessary, and engage in the two-stage upgrade
to v3 later? (The fee isn't a problem. What I want is for TB to work
for me.)?
2. Take David up on his generous offer to help out with his v1
information, then later engaging in the process
Thursday, February 03, 2005, 10:03:20 PM, you wrote:
DC Failing that... I still have my V1 reg information (all three pieces!)
DC Since I bought a new licence for V3 instead of an upgrade, I don't
DC think there'd be any problem if I gave him my V1 info, would there?
DC With the understanding
Jerrold Mundis @ 2005-Feb-4 12:33:50 AM
Catch-22, Kafka-esque - Take Your Pick: Can't Get Registration Help
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I used RegEdit on my old drive (contained in an external enclosure,
connected to to my new system by a USB), got to
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The clicked
Hallo Keith,
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:56:20 -0700GMT (31-12-2004, 4:56 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
KR Thanks.
KR
KR Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all
Hallo David,
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 23:04:57 -0500GMT (31-12-2004, 5:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
DRS The Bat! v3 Registration
DRS
DRS Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection
Hi, everyone.
I upgraded to version 3 a few months ago. I am currently trying
to reinstall TB!, but can't find my registration email.
I'm sure I have it somewhere. Can someone tell me what to search
for? Who would be the sender, and what would be the subject?
Thanks
Hello Keith,
Thursday, December 30, 2004, 7:56:20 PM, you wrote:
KR I'm sure I have it somewhere. Can someone tell me what to search
KR for? Who would be the sender, and what would be the subject?
From: The Bat! v3 Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RITLABS)
Subject: The Bat! v3 Registration
--
Best
Hi Keith,
On Thursday, December 30, 2004, 10:56:20 PM, you wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I upgraded to version 3 a few months ago. I am currently trying
to reinstall TB!, but can't find my registration email.
I'm sure I have it somewhere. Can someone tell me what to search
for? Who would
On Friday, October 1, 2004, 6:11:20 AM, Lawrence wrote in message:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L I'm not sure where the base is. Where do I find it?
Lawrence, do you have a note of your serial number? If so you
need to go to the Ritlabs page here and generate your
registration details:
https
will be in the shop so I would
like to register this copy of TB! in the meantime.
My registration information is, unfortunately on the system unit and
unavailable. I checked the RitLabs site and it says I should
o Find your registration in our base
o Be sure, that requestor of key data is real owner
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
