Hello Stefan,
Regarding v9.4.3, I immediately had a problem with the download manager/images
as shown in attachment. So far all other emails display what I want to see,
and when I clicked the button to do so, the button disappeared. It does not
work for Sacramento Bee email list. It does
Hello,
is there a way to make links in html messages "clickable"?
This only works for me when I switch to text.
Is there a setting somewhere that I'm missing?
--
Best regards,
Susanne mailto:sisk...@gmail.com
Using The Bat! 9.3.1
OS: Windows 10.0 B
Hello Bat People,
How do I delete unwanted fonts that show up in the HTML drop-down font list?
I assume that it is done in my template options. I want to get rid of three out
of five fonts that appear in the listing.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Hello,
Is there a way to set preferred message view on per-folder basis?
Say mailing lists and some others would default to text and news will
default to HTML.
--
v9.1.18 x64 on Windows 10 18363
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL
Hello,
Where can I change things like a font declaration in HTML message and
CSS styling of reply (by default - with #ff border) ?
I am aware of Account Properties --> Templates and Viewer templates, but
using these I can tweak only plain-text representaiton, surely HTML is
adjusta
Hello Everyone,
is there a setting for choosing how to read emails that is linked to
specific accounts?
I would like to read some accounts in html but certain accounts in txt
format?
--
Best regards,
Tom
using TheBat! 8.0.10 on Win 7Prof, 64bit
se
...
>>> I'm not certain of the release state of the fixed version.
...
RLD> I've now upgraded from v6.8.8 to v7.3.12, but not all the "extra wide"
RLD> emails are reformatted to fit inside the message pane of the triple-pane
RLD> window. Most disappointed.
At the tim
in TB that was fixed 2 betas ago and is no longer
>>>> an issue in the next release.
>>
RLD>>> Are you saying that if I now upgrade from 6.8.8 to 7.3.4 (the latest
RLD>>> release) that emails formatted in the TheBat! HTML Viewer will look
correct,
RLD>>> and
gt;>> email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I
>>>>> use
>
>>> ... This is a bug in TB that was fixed 2 betas ago and is no longer
>>> an issue in the next release.
>
RLD>> Are you saying that if I now upgrade from 6.
fixed 2 betas ago and is no longer
>> an issue in the next release.
RLD> Are you saying that if I now upgrade from 6.8.8 to 7.3.4 (the latest
RLD> release) that emails formatted in the TheBat! HTML Viewer will look
correct,
RLD> and as good as those formatted in the Windows OS H
saying that if I now upgrade from 6.8.8 to 7.3.4 (the latest
release) that emails formatted in the TheBat! HTML Viewer will look correct,
and as good as those formatted in the Windows OS HTML Viewer?
Richard
--
Richard L de S Clauson, 0118-956-7775 or 07710-412815
email:mailto:rich...
Dear Richard,
@13-Sep-2016, 0:41 +0100 (13-Sep 07:00 here) Richard L de S Clauson
[RLD] in mid:273697223.20160913070...@virbius.co.uk said to Richard:
RLD> Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35 PM, Richard L de S Clauson
(rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote:
...
>> email ends up much wider than the
Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35 PM, Richard L de S Clauson
(rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote:
> For quite some time (probably over 2 years) dome of the HTML (formatted)
> emails I receive are formatted very badly by The Bat!.
>
> What is happening, and mainly caused by large emb
For quite some time (probably over 2 years) dome of the HTML (formatted)
emails I receive are formatted very badly by The Bat!.
What is happening, and mainly caused by large embedded images, is that the
email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I use
can display
not use HTML except on the
very odd occasion that I need to add into the email _body_ something
that cannot easily be shown in plaintext. The vast majority of the
time, such content sits more happily in my mind as an attachment. I
send and receive dozens of emails per day with (mainly) Word, Excel
Hello Robin,
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:22:19 +1000GMT Robin Anson wrote:
RA How can that be? I don't know, but I have finally given up on TB! for
RA business use and am moving to Outlook now.
What a pity! I use HTML templates for my business accounts and they are
working without problems
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 at 00:52:24 +0400,Assad wrote:
Hello Robin,
On 08 April 2014, Robin Anson wrote and made these points on the
subject of Quick templates and html:
RA I haven't yet sorted out why the delimiters I use in my quick
RA templates (e.g. , ', %, $, ^, etc) appear in the output
Hello Robin,
On 08 April 2014, Robin Anson wrote and made these points on the
subject of Quick templates and html:
RA I haven't yet sorted out why the delimiters I use in my quick
RA templates (e.g. , ', %, $, ^, etc) appear in the output when I use an
RA html message template.
One way
Batfolk,
Has anyone any experience with using html templates and quick
templates together?
I have to use html for business purposes (company standard) and I have
an extensive set of quick templates that I use for formatting emails
etc. However the two do not seem to mix well.
When I use my
Hi
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 at 2:00:07 PM, in
mid:1146297420.20140319150...@ags.lu, Adrian Godfrey wrote:
Is there any way of using filters to delete
those HTML attachments immediately?
I have not tried, I simply ignore them. (-:
I want to keep the
actual text mail
Hi Thomas,
Tuesday, March 18, 2014, 1:30:35 PM, you wrote:
Yes. You can drag it to become smaller. I do that on a regular basis.
Thanks that is useful, it is not very attractive really but making it smaller
helps.
--
Warmest regards,
Paul
Created using TheBat! 6.2.14 on Windows
I can't see anything obvious in the filter actions, but some Yahoo
mailing lists have a nasty habit of sending me a message.html
attachment, i.e. content type text/html. In such cases, I see a text
and an html tab
Is there any way of using filters to delete those HTML
Hello Paul,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:49:28 + GMT (18-Mar-14, 02:49 +0700 GMT),
Paul Meathrel wrote:
I am using a HTML reply email template. However the blue bar which
appears alongside the quoted message is rather thick and unsightly -
is there any way to change this please?
Yes. You can
Hi all,
I am using a HTML reply email template. However the blue bar which appears
alongside the quoted message is rather thick and unsightly - is there any way
to change this please?
thanks
Paul
--
Warmest regards,
Paul
Created using TheBat! 6.2.14 on Windows
I am using a HTML reply email template. However the blue bar which appears
alongside the quoted message is rather thick and unsightly - is there any way
to change this please?
The answer is no, but if you change the email to plain text then copy the
quoted text and switch back without changing
Hello Rick,
On Monday, March 17, 2014, you wrote:
I am using a HTML reply email template. However the blue bar which appears
alongside the quoted message is rather thick and unsightly - is there any way
to change this please?
The answer is no, but if you change the email to plain text
without clicking on the html tab, or the part_01.txt tab.
This suggests to me that the messages are received in HTML format
without including a plaintext version, and with no text content in
the HTML version.
I have received such message too. In my case, they were all malformed.
But I think Outlook
Hello Assad Kety,
On Friday, February 21, 2014, 7:49:47 AM, Assad Kety wrote:
I have a problem with greater symbol '' in my HTML template. The
template renders fine in plain text but in html it is messed up. How
to solve this please? Thanks.
It might because that symbol is used
Hello Julian,
On 21 February 2014, jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote and made these
points on the subject of Using '' in HTML:
Hello Assad Kety,
On Friday, February 21, 2014, 7:49:47 AM, Assad Kety wrote:
I have a problem with greater symbol '' in my HTML template. The
template
Hello All,
I have a problem with greater symbol '' in my HTML template. The
template renders fine in plain text but in html it is messed up. How
to solve this please? Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Assad
Using The Bat! 6.2.6
under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
Hallo Roelof,
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:12:08 +0100GMT (11-11-2013, 17:12 , where I
live), you wrote:
RO This message is composed in HTML, so I can show some examples:
Aww. Shucks.
Apparently the list server strips the HTML component, because the copy
in my sent mail folder is HTML/plain
11 November 2013
If I write an e-mail with say http://www.gatesgarth.com in a message
it is not clickable when posted, if I am viewing in html mode, but if I
change to text mode it is. Why is that please, and can i change
something? Thanks.
__
Best Regards, Chris Wilson
Hallo Chris,
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:35:04 +GMT (11-11-2013, 16:35 , where I
live), you wrote:
CW If I write an e-mail with say http://www.gatesgarth.com in a message
CW it is not clickable when posted, if I am viewing in html mode, but if I
CW change to text mode it is.
CW Why
Hallo Roelof,
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:12:08 +0100GMT (11-11-2013, 17:12 , where I
live), you wrote:
RO This message is composed in HTML, so I can show some examples:
Aww. Shucks.
Apparently the list server strips the HTML component, because the copy
in my sent mail folder is HTML/plain text
Hi
On Wednesday 19 December 2012 at 12:13:09 AM, in
mid:138876970.20121219111...@anson.net.au, Robin Anson wrote:
Anything from LinkedIn now displays this message. It
didn't use to, but perhaps LinkedIn has changed its
html email generator.
I just checked with some recent messages from
Hi
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 at 4:28:12 AM, in
mid:307839833.20121218052...@musaic.net, St - Musaic.Net wrote:
I haven't seen that message myself. I have seen tons of
spam with broken HTML - but a googling indicates it's
indeed related to TB.
The results I found when searching were
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 at 05:28:12 +0100,St wrote:
Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers.
I haven't seen that message myself. I have seen tons of spam with broken
HTML - but a googling indicates it's indeed related to TB.
Yes, it's what TB displays when it doesn't like
Batfolk,
I frequently get HTML email that displays in TB with the message
Invalid HTML !
Please forward this message to developers.
Thanks.
Strangely enough, it doesn't indicate any email address for forwarding the
message.
Do they want it? Do they care? How hard am I supposed
Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers.
I haven't seen that message myself. I have seen tons of spam with broken
HTML - but a googling indicates it's indeed related to TB.
Is this problem connected to one/some specific Sender(s) or is it
present in just about any message
Strangely enough, it doesn't indicate any email address for forwarding
the message. Do they want it? Do they care? How hard am I supposed to
research where to send it??
From the shores of this list and other TB-related lists I would say
Ritlabs is pretty non-interested in bug issues. It
Hi all,
these days I switched from v5.0.36.2 to v5.2.2 Release. The html
viewer now behaves a little differently than before:
- A specific message that always had rendering difficulties with the
old version is now displayed fine.
- Another message that used to be displayed fine previously
Hi,
sorry - this was supposed to go to the beta list.
However, interesting to note: The command Specials/Mailinglist/Post
sends to the TO address of the message that is currently selected.
Mental note: Make sure to select the right one before using this
command. ;-)
--
Mit freundlichem
Hello Thomas,
You want to send a bug report? I'll support it.
And yes, if you look at the plain text part of the message, the reply
with be plain text. I like that, and I believe this is WAD.
Yes, it most probably WAD. Not worth opening a bug report.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hello Raymund,
For years and years I have resisted to writing e-mail in HTML, I only
use plain text. But I have a few correspondents now who would much
prefer that I reply to them in HTML.
Why not add them to the address book and define a reply template and
set the format there to HTML
Thursday, October 4, 2012, 6:46:42 AM, you wrote:
I would like to automate this in my templates depending if I am replying
to a plain text or HTML message. I have looked and looked at the
complete list of macros included in Help (probably not up of to date)
and I have not found any way
Hello MAU,
Friday, October 5, 2012, 3:53:56 PM, you wrote:
For years and years I have resisted to writing e-mail in HTML, I only
use plain text. But I have a few correspondents now who would much
prefer that I reply to them in HTML.
Why not add them to the address book and define a reply
Hello Jim,
I would like to automate this in my templates depending if I am replying
to a plain text or HTML message. I have looked and looked at the
complete list of macros included in Help (probably not up of to date)
and I have not found any way of detecting the format of the original
Hello Thomas,
Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / Take the tickmark off
[ ] Reply to HTML mails in plain text.
You will then reply to HTML mails in HTML, and to plain text mails in
plain text. Has been working well over here for years.
But for some reason, maybe templates, it doesn't
Hello MAU,
Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / Take the tickmark off
[ ] Reply to HTML mails in plain text.
You will then reply to HTML mails in HTML, and to plain text mails in
plain text. Has been working well over here for years.
But for some reason, maybe templates, it doesn't
Hello MAU,
Saturday, October 6, 2012, 12:21:09 AM, you wrote:
Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / Take the tickmark off
[ ] Reply to HTML mails in plain text.
You will then reply to HTML mails in HTML, and to plain text mails in
plain text. Has been working well over here for years
Hello all,
For years and years I have resisted to writing e-mail in HTML, I only
use plain text. But I have a few correspondents now who would much
prefer that I reply to them in HTML.
I would like to automate this in my templates depending if I am replying
to a plain text or HTML message. I
Hello MAU,
A reminder of what MAU typed on:
Thursday, October 04, 2012 at 13:46:42 GMT +0200
M For years and years I have resisted to writing e-mail in HTML, I only
M use plain text. But I have a few correspondents now who would much
M prefer that I reply to them in HTML.
M I would like
Hello Stuart,
Thank you for responding.
Not sure if it helps in your case, but you can use
Options/Preferences/Viewer/Editor/Reply to HTML in Plain Text. (and remove the
checkmark). Unfortunately this would then apply to all e-mail.
It doesn't seem to make any difference whether I check
Hello MAU,
Thursday, October 4, 2012, 9:27:32 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Stuart,
M Thank you for responding.
Not sure if it helps in your case, but you can use
Options/Preferences/Viewer/Editor/Reply to HTML in Plain Text. (and remove
the
checkmark). Unfortunately this would then apply
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, October 4, 2012, 11:36:55 PM, you wrote:
TF Except sometimes, and I haven;t found out yet why, so I have sent a
TF bug report.
Correction: So I have NOT send a bug report (yet).
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply
Hello Thomas,
OK, just saying. I have taken the tick-mark off a couple of versions
ago, and over here it works as advertised. If I get an email in HTML,
the reply will be in HTML.
Well, I have tried again, even re-starting TB, and it does not work
here. As I have said, maybe it has something
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding received messages which
contain images now strips
Hello Rick,
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 you wrote:
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding
Mornin' Batties,
In the past I was always able to paste images in
my HTML messages and now am no longer able to do
so. When I CTRL-V to paste the image the cursor
moves to the right one space but the image doesn't
appear. Also, forwarding received messages which
contain images now strips
happening, Apple is sending me HTML messages which TB! is
having trouble displaying in HTML format. The actual body of
the message (from Apple) can be viewed by clicking on the
TEXT tab at the bottom of said message.
So, if my assumptions are correct, to whom should I forward
these?
--
TIA,
Jack
Greetings,
I sometimes receive emails in HTML format with
line lengths exceeding the width of my screen. Is
this set by the sender's editor or is there
something I could change in TB! to keep the line
lengths within the confines of my screen?
If I reply to these messages my text also exceeds
about the
BM Image Download Manager?
There is no documentation.
This is how the Download Manager (the globe with the question mark)
works:
Whenever a message (I believe this only applies to HTML messages) adds
a picture by URL only, the Download Manager shows up automatically.
This is your case #3
Hi,
Monday, June 13, 2011, 4:36:14 PM,bill.mcquil...@pobox.com wrote:
The Image Download Manager
may be accessed by clicking the Yellow Question Mark at the right of the
message header (To, From, Subject).
Thanks!
I played with the download manager, and can now see my newsletters in
Hi,
Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 10:08:31 AM,thomas.gm...@gmx.net wrote:
That's it.
Thanks!
It works as described.
--
Best regards,
Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com
Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600
Hello Susanne,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:39:04 -0700 GMT (15/Jun/11, 4:39 AM +0700 GMT),
Susanne wrote:
That's it.
S Thanks!
S It works as described.
Glad to have helped.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44
Hi,
is there a way to make them visible in TB?
--
Best regards,
Susannemailto:sisk...@gmail.com
Using The Bat! 4.2.6
OS: Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600
Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
email clients.) Those two often refuse to
correctly display messages sent by the other one, though
both programs can send the same messages to a GMail user
who can see them both fine using Google's web mail interface.
Basically, until there's a standard for how to handle HTML
mail, especially
Hi,
Monday, June 13, 2011, 12:00:47 PM,the...@e-visions.com wrote:
I'm assuming you mean pictures embedded within your message...
Yes. All I get are placeholders, and embedded pictures are *never* visible in
TB for me.
Was hoping I was just missing a setting somewhere.
--
Best regards,
a setting somewhere.
Images can be associated with a message in several ways:
1 - A message may have attachments of images or other documents,
2 - An HTML message can have place holders that refer to images that
are included with the message,
3 - An HTML message may have place holders
Hello Rick,
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:09:24 -0500 GMT (09/Dec/10, 9:09 AM +0700 GMT),
Rick wrote:
R They need to rebuild the HTML editor after the current IMAP rewrite
Certainly. I have some issues with the HTML editor too, but now it's
the time for the IMAP people. They have waited long enough
Dear all,
If I have a signature A which I want to use in the TXT version of
TXT/HTML e-mails, and a signature B which I want to use in the HTML
version of TXT/HTML e-mails, how do I tell The Bat! in templates which
signature to use when?
Best regards,
Loek van Kooten
=
Please subscribe
it.
MThis works for most email clients I've used.
This method doesn't seem to work for me. Although I can
drag the original message I'm trying to forward into
the new blank message, the resulting attachment becomes
1.eml and when received in my Gmail account, contains
nothing but HTML code
Hello Bats!
I receive daily comic strips in the form of HTML. Although TB! now
allows me to view these from within TB!, they each come with an HTML
attachment called MESSAGE.HTML. These attachments are represented as
FireFox icons and if you click on one, FireFox gets launched and goes
straight
the attachment?
I can't answer your specific question about gmail but can report that
forwarding HTML emails in the normal way is unreliable for me. If I
forward the message as an attachment, it generally gets there intact.
For clarity, I mean that I attach the *entire* message to my outgoing
email
the message is forwarded, cannot
properly view the attachment?
M I can't answer your specific question about gmail but can report that
M forwarding HTML emails in the normal way is unreliable for me. If I
M forward the message as an attachment, it generally gets there intact.
M For clarity, I mean
not viewing the message properly from
GMAIL or, since the FireFox icon attachment is
nowhere to be found when the message is forwarded,
cannot properly view the attachment?
M I can't answer your specific question about gmail but
M can report that forwarding HTML emails in the normal
M way
, the
resulting attachment becomes 1.eml and when received in my Gmail
account, contains nothing but HTML code.
M Method Two
MAlternative Forward from the Specials menu
M(or Shift+Alt+F5)
M
MThe body to which the forwarded message is attached will have
Mwhatever content
Fellow Batties,
I just noticed something which I don't quite understand. I received an
HTML message which displays properly, in that the text does not go all
the way to the end of the screen. However, if I click on REPLY, the
resulting HTML reply screen has the text of the original message
/Message%284%29.html
However, if I *then* click on the SHARE button which appears at the
bottom of the comic strip, the resulting URL becomes:
http://www.gocomics.com/features/32/feature_items/457715
If you can clear up my confusion regarding the URLs, I'd be happy to
report this as a bug
the email from Uclick,
the resulting URL which appears in Firefox's address bar is:
file:///C:/DOCUME~1/Jack/LOCALS~1/Temp/bat/Message%284%29.html
However, if I *then* click on the SHARE button which appears at the
bottom of the comic strip, the resulting URL becomes:
http://www.gocomics.com
Hi
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 at 6:03:54 PM, in
mid:801655840.20091110120...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL So, should someone (who, me???) report it as a
JSL bug?
TF Yes you, as you were the first one to discover the
TF bug. ;-)
TF Please post the full URL here and I will support.
'Ello Jack,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:03:54 -0600 (your time) you said:
If you can clear up my confusion regarding the URLs, I'd be happy to
report this as a bug if you can also instruct me on how to do that.
Go here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php
And report it.
It's a bit of a PITA
.html
However, if I *then* click on the SHARE button which appears at the
bottom of the comic strip, the resulting URL becomes:
http://www.gocomics.com/features/32/feature_items/457715
If you can clear up my confusion regarding the URLs, I'd be happy to
report this as a bug if you can also
Hello Thomas,
TF Hello Jack,
TF On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:31:45 -0600 GMT (09/Nov/09, 23:31 PM +0700 GMT),
TF Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
S I can confirm that also. Exactly 18 pixels is cut off and not
S displayed. So, just under 5mm, or 4.7625mm. ;-)
JSL Ok, well that seems to prove that it's not my
/Message%284%29.html
However, if I *then* click on the SHARE button which appears at the
bottom of the comic strip, the resulting URL becomes:
http://www.gocomics.com/features/32/feature_items/457715
If you can clear up my confusion regarding the URLs, I'd be happy to
report this as a bug
Hello Jack,
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:43 -0600 GMT (11/Nov/09, 5:50 AM +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
TF Please post the full URL here and I will support.
[..]
JSL Ok Thomas. I'm not sure I did this correctly but here's the link:
JSL https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7775
Thanks, I
Hello Simon (and Thomas),
S 'Ello Thomas,
S On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:11:14 +0700 (your time) you said:
I confirm that a couple of millimeters are cut off the comic strip at the
right side, rendering it unviewable in TB!.
S I can confirm that also. Exactly 18 pixels is cut off and not
S
Hi
How to you force the HTML viewer to respect your colour choices over
those of the sender?
By default, I read all emails in white print on a black background,
usually in plaintext but it is sometimes necessary to look at an HTML
version because the plaintext version is meaningless. Aside
Hello Jack,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:31:45 -0600 GMT (09/Nov/09, 23:31 PM +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
S I can confirm that also. Exactly 18 pixels is cut off and not
S displayed. So, just under 5mm, or 4.7625mm. ;-)
JSL Ok, well that seems to prove that it's not my monitor causing it.
JSL
Hello Jack,
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:36:24 +0700 GMT (07/Nov/09, 7:36 AM +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
JSL If you decide to subscribe to a comic strip I'd be interested to learn
JSL if you experience the same problem with the display. I might mention
JSL that I get a second comic strip from
'Ello Thomas,
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:11:14 +0700 (your time) you said:
I confirm that a couple of millimeters are cut off the comic strip at the
right side, rendering it unviewable in TB!.
I can confirm that also. Exactly 18 pixels is cut off and not
displayed. So, just under 5mm, or 4.7625mm.
Hello Lawrence,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:09:59 -0500 GMT (03/Sep/09, 23:09 PM +0700 GMT),
Lawrence Johnson wrote:
LJ Is there any option to improve the rendering of HTML in the message
LJ viewer?
Not by the user, but by Ritlabs.
LJ The problem seems to involve multiple columns in a table. When
LJ
Is there any option to improve the rendering of HTML in the message
viewer? The problem seems to involve multiple columns in a table.
When there is text to be displayed in the columns, its clear that the
second column is being partially overlaid by the first. At first I thought it
was the fault
Hi
I have a couple of contacts that send HTML emails formatted with some
of the text in black. As I read my email with white text on a black
background, I miss this bit of the text unless spacing suggests there
is something there to highlight.
There are no longer separate places to set PTV
Hi
Can anybody confirm or refute?
Links that are written as a URL to click in the HTML version of a
message are also available in the plaintext version.
Links where the text you click in the HTML version differs from the
URL are not present as links at all in the plaintext version.
--
Best
Hi
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 at 6:18:51 PM, in
mid:736350988.20090818181...@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of contacts that send HTML emails
formatted with some of the text in black. As I read my
email with white text on a black background, I miss
this bit of the text
Hi
On Sunday 16 August 2009 at 8:59:11 PM, in
mid:1119488860.20090816235...@intnet.mu, Assad Kety wrote:
RO Well, maybe you shouldn't use the generic profile...
How to go about it then? I can't find a way to
may background colour sticky for all new messages.
Thanks.
Hello MFPA,
On Monday, August 17, 2009, Mfpa wrote and made these points on the
subject of setting background colour for HTML message:
M Try creating an additional profile and see if the required setting
M works as desired when using that profile.
I figured out that the profile
Hello Assad,
A reminder of what Assad Kety typed on:
Monday, August 17, 2009 at 18:33:23 GMT +0400
AK I figured out that the profile is for displaying HTML, but for
AK composing it has no bearing. I still have no clue how to set HTML
AK background colour. Could it be a bug
Hello Stuart,
On Monday, August 17, 2009, Stuart Cuddy wrote and made these points
on the subject of setting background colour for HTML message:
AK I figured out that the profile is for displaying HTML, but for
AK composing it has no bearing. I still have no clue how to set HTML
AK
1 - 100 of 1966 matches
Mail list logo
