Guilty of what JD? Could you please leave enough
of the message so that the rest of us can understand
what you are responding to in context. Thank
You
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:50:29 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/12/2005 1:24:41 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL
No he can not; that is part of his devices.
Straw men can't dance.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guilty of what JD? Could you please leave enough of the message so that the rest of us can understand what you are responding to in context. Thank You
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:50:29 EDT [EMAIL
In a message dated 4/23/2005 5:03:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Straw men can't dance.
I like. I will add this to my new and profoundly revised, kind and gentler sarcasm commentary.
JD
In a message dated 4/12/2005 1:24:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy writes:
How can you make this claim when the Church are the ecclesia or "called out ones" followers of The Way
Even the best are guilty
John wrote:
If you agree or believe that God wrote Rev. 7:9 --
well,
you are kind of stuck, David. The passage says that no
one can number them.
No, the passage says no MANcould number them, which is an idiom that
simply means that you can't look at the crowd and assign a number to
[TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the JEWS. Jesus didn't live and die as the "King of the Jews" that was a title
In a message dated 4/13/2005 4:28:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many are on the broadway Few are on the narrow way!
MANY are called but FEW are chosen!
Du 7:7 The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye
AND FEW at that, how about the others?
And all the SAVED today are Christians and Few but how about the others?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/13/2005 4:28:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many are on the broadway Few are on the narrow way!MANY are called but
In a message dated 4/13/2005 4:49:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AND FEW at that, how about the others?
And all the SAVED today are Christians and Few but how about the others?
Rev 7:9 -- let the scriptural wars begin !!! Kind of silly (?)
John wrote:
In Galatians, Paul makes clear the teaching
on holy days -- there are none.
David Miller wrote:
Can you elaborate on this, John? What specific
passage did you have in mind?
John wrote:
Gal. 2:19; 4: 9-11; Romans 14 (where the weak
or wrong brother is the one who honors
Judy wrote:
I believe that the seed was always spiritual in nature,
ie Abraham had two sons only Isaac was the son of promise.
But Paul says that this concept of two sons was an allegory (Gal. 2:24),
meaning that we should not adopt any idea of a literal spiritual seed.
Judy wrote:
Jesus was
In a message dated 4/13/2005 8:12:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I truly hope that my
questions do not cause you to get upset with me.
I will answer your questions, but, regarding this comment: I do get angry with you -- no sense of humor in me for David Miller. It 's
John wrote:
Rev 7:9 --
let the scriptural wars begin !!!
John, did you ever look up Rev. 7:14 in the Greek and see that this is
talking about those coming out of THE TRIBULATION THE GREAT? If we accept
this literally, this means that this innumerable multitude
In a message dated 4/13/2005 9:17:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, did you ever look up Rev. 7:14 in the Greek and see that this is
talking about those coming out of THE TRIBULATION THE GREAT? If we accept
this literally, this means that this innumerable multitude
John wrote:
You is de only one who robs me of my smile.
Got to work on that.
Yes, we do need to work on that, don't we.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:53:06 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy wrote: I believe that the seed was always
spiritual in nature, ie Abraham had two sons only Isaac was the son of
promise.DM: But Paul says that this concept of two
sons was an allegory (Gal.2:24),meaning that
John wrote:
Are they
without number or not?
Not. The passage only says that no man could
number them, meaning, that if a man looked at them all, there were so man that a
mancould not assign a specific number to them. Surely you would
agree that God cannumber them.
Peace be with
Judy wrote:
God called Isaac the seed of Promise in Genesis 21:12
so nothing has changed.
I don't see the word promise in Gen. 21:12. Even if it did, Paul
interprets for us that this understanding is an allegory. Furthermore,
consider Romans 4:13-16 and see how the seed has nothing to do
Reminds me of that line in "Michael" where Michael
says:"I created standing in line."
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 13, 2005 14:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Lo
Ira furor brevis est, my brother.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 13, 2005 12:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
In a message dated 4/13/2005 8:12:28 AM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL
In a message dated 4/13/2005 1:35:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
Are they without number or not?
Not. The passage only says that no man could number them, meaning, that if a man looked at them all, there were so man that a man could not assign a specific
JD
wrote: In the Revelation, the "forces of evil" and the "forces of good"
are hugh.
I
feel sorry forHugh.
Debbie
In a message dated 4/13/2005 4:05:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD wrote: In the Revelation, the "forces of evil" and the "forces of good" are hugh.
I feel sorry for Hugh.
I also read in the Revelation that when Babylon falls, there will be no craftsmen found in
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:06:42 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Judy wrote:God called Isaac the seed of Promise in Genesis
21:12 so nothing has changed. I don't see the word
"promise" in Gen. 21:12. Even if it did, Paul
Sorry I paraphrased - Abraham was given the promise and
In a message dated 4/13/2005 8:12:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why is the weak brother
the wrong brother in your eyes?
Weak because he is wrong, of course. certainly not because of lack of conviction.
JD
In a message dated 4/13/2005 8:12:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, the Galatians passage does not condemn honoring holy days
Didn't say this, did I? If so, I meant to only convey the teaching that holy days as a doctrinal teaching of the New Covenant Church is one of
In a message dated 4/13/2005 1:54:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ira furor brevis est, my brother.
Yes and :-)
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie Sawczak
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005
5:04 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
JD wrote: In the
Revelation, the forces of evil and the forces of
good
JD, I would respond except thatthis is
past the point of discussion. You have an "attitude" and you
are shouting. jt
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/11/2005 1:31:46 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005
You all want virtually no one to go to heaven
-- fine.
JD
JD, you just want scriptures about
obedience to be to the Jews only.
(Not a good way to get everyone to go to heaven!) Izzy
In a message dated 4/11/2005 6:22:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
In Galatians, Paul makes clear the teaching on
holy days -- there are none.
Can you elaborate on this, John? What specific passage did you have in
mind?
Gal. 2:19; 4: 9-11; Romans 14 (where
In a message dated 4/11/2005 6:35:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might want to look at Rev. 7:14 in the Greek. These are they who came
out of THE TRIBULATION THE GREAT.
I don't care where they came from (to the great tribulation is happening now --- especially
In a message dated 4/12/2005 3:34:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD, I would respond except that this is past the point of discussion. You have an "attitude" and you
are shouting. jt
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated
In a message dated 4/12/2005 6:19:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You all want virtually no one to go to heaven -- fine.
JD
JD, you just want scriptures about obedience to be to the Jews only. (Not a good way to get everyone to go to heaven!) Izzy
Silliness in
In a message dated 4/11/2005 5:44:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am only reading scripture. Specifically, with what part of the argument (above) do you disagree? I would like to know.
Jd
All of it. Izzy
Another non- answer. Clever. Allows more time form the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/11/2005 4:20:57 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you honestly believe that what Jesus
taught was only valid for pre resurrection Jews?Did I say this Terry. The answer is NO. Not even
close. Try reading apart from you
In a message dated 4/12/2005 10:13:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
=
We were not talking who was first, John.. We were discussing the importance of obedience. It is pretty obvious that you will never get it, so
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005
01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So, while we are
proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the
JEWS. Jesus didn't live and die as the
"King of the Jews" that was a title given by the Romans; in actuality
Sent: April 12, 2005 14:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005
01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So, while we are
proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the
JEWS. Jesus didn't
In a message dated 4/12/2005 11:43:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this:
Jews lived and died as the the King of the JEWS.
Jesus didn't
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:27:01 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the JEWS. Jesus didn't live and die
as the "King of the Jews" that was a title given by the Romans; in actuality He
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 12, 2005 14:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005
01:27:01 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken
sailor, we might consider
this: Jews live
words, did he have Jewish blood running through his veins?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:08
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
I believe that the seed was always spiritual in nature,
ie Abraham had two sons only Isaac was the son of promise.
Jesus was Jewish in the sense that he was born under
the Law in the nation of Israel - as for His blood. We are
told in Heb 9:13,14 that the blood of bulls and goats
sanctified
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:49
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
I believe that the seed was always spiritual in
nature, ie Abraham had two sons only Isaac was the son
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 9:50
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
How do we reconcile Matt 22:14 many
are called; few are chosen with passages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we reconcile Matt 22:14 "many
are called; few are chosen" with passages like Rev. 7:9 "more than
could be counted .. from every nation and tribe?"
Do we realize that statements such as Matt 22:14 ARE LIMITED to the
Gospel Accounts? When Christ speaks of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we reconcile Matt
22:14 "many are called; few are chosen" with passages like Rev.
7:9 "more than could be counted .. from every nation and
tribe?"
We understand that ALL scripture is given by "inspiration of God" and
that God does
In a message dated 4/11/2005 1:46:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do we reconcile Matt 22:14 "many are called; few are chosen" with passages like Rev. 7:9 "more than could be counted .. from every nation and tribe?"
JD
Already asked and answered. So if you dont
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the . JEWS. His lineage was ..Jewish. He was killed by the . Jews. The church was
Only undeniable for those that ERR not knowing the scriptures:
Act 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the
Actually, I was not asking for your non-answer. In fact, I was
asking as a set-up for the rest of the posted
discussion. I am saying that few refers to the
Jews -- making the Rev 7 contrast of uncountable hordes of
saved folk a no problem issue. The correct response, Izzy,
should have
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might
consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the
. JEWS. His lineage
was ..Jewish. He was killed
Original Message
Subject:
[Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving]
Date:
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:51:56 -0500
From:
Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might
consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the
. JEWS. His lineage was
..Jewish. He was killed by the
In a message dated 4/11/2005 9:41:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Only undeniable for those that ERR not knowing the scriptures:
Act 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing
In a message dated 4/11/2005 11:21:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, I was not asking for your non-answer. In fact, I was "asking" as a set-up for the rest of the posted discussion. I am saying that "few" refers to the Jews -- making the Rev 7 contrast of
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:26 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not Loving
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jesus lived and died as the the King of the . JEWS
In a message dated 4/11/2005 12:07:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of the . JEWS. His
Because Christ physical
ministry was to the Jews and not the Gentiles. Couple that with the
fact that all such statments are presented to a Jewish audience.
JD
So then it follows that His promises are
in the physical realm only??? Scripture is not just presented to a Jewish
audience,
I think that one
of these days, I will send you a case of fresh towels
!!! :-)
Jd
I prefer pink. Izzy
In a message dated 4/11/2005 12:32:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because Christ physical ministry was to the Jews and not the Gentiles. Couple that with the fact that all such statments are presented to a Jewish audience.
JD
So then it follows that His promises
You should read the scriptures b4 U post[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/11/2005 9:41:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Only undeniable for those that ERR not knowing the scriptures:Act 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that
What about the prophecies and the
rest of scripture JD?
"I the Lord have called thee in
righteousness and will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the
Gentiles; to open the blind eyes, to bring out the prisoners from the
prison,
Possibly some "Restoration" residuals. Maybe Smitson is the true Israel.ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I was not asking for your non-answer. In fact, I was "asking" as a set-up for the rest of the posted discussion. I am saying that "few" refers to the Jews -- making the Rev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/11/2005 12:07:14
PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, while we are proof-texting like a drunken sailor, we might
consider this: Jews lived and died as the the King of
I am only reading scripture. Specifically, with what part of the
argument (above) do you disagree? I would like to know.
Jd
All of it. Izzy
John wrote:
In Galatians, Paul makes clear the teaching on
holy days -- there are none.
Can you elaborate on this, John? What specific passage did you have in
mind?
John wrote:
The eating of meats? No reason to NOT eat except,
of course, the conscience of some
John wrote:
Does anyone know of teaching outside the
Gospel Accounts that counter the Revelation picture?
You might want to look at Rev. 7:14 in the Greek. These are they who came
out of THE TRIBULATION THE GREAT.
I'm sure you know the significance of definite articles being used this way.
In a message dated 4/11/2005 1:27:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should read the scriptures b4 U post
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/11/2005 9:41:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Only undeniable for those that ERR not
In a message dated 4/11/2005 1:51:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I prefer pink. Izzy
Noted and saved.
JD
In a message dated 4/11/2005 4:20:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you honestly believe that what Jesus taught was only valid for pre resurrection Jews?Did I say this Terry. The answer is NO. Not even close. Try reading apart from you Rbias. Whether He was speaking to
In a message dated 4/9/2005 2:22:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
YOU are the one always demanding PROOF, etc, etc, etc. You get yourself into these stews by doing that and accusing others of wrongdoing. Read your own posts and you wont need proof of anything. Alzheimers can
In a message dated 4/9/2005 3:44:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will stand or fall upon what I alone accept or reject and that's just the way it is JD - there will be no pastor or self styled theologian standing beside me to hold me up so I determine to hear and obey the
This is really rich JD. Here I am advocating
love for and obedience tothe Lord (they
go together like siamese twins if we love Him we will do what He says) all the
timewhich you promptly wrest into"legalism and works" for whatever reason and no
matter how many scriptures I post validating
In a message dated 4/9/2005 1:01:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD in orange
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:54:07 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the TT List you appear (to me at least) to be completely taken with what you call the "larger context" and the
"Christ event".
In a message dated 4/10/2005 2:37:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So please tell me how you figure I the one who is stubborn and rebellious?? Yes the Lord is able to strengthen the weak in faith who are fearful of eating certain foods (but who love the truth and want to
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:37:32 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can't afford to allow Romans 14:4 to a
principle of truth, so you limit it's usefulness to the meants only question
and continue uneffected - and you ask me
why I say you are stubborn and rebellious (and
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:23:14 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:JD in orangeOn Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:54:07 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:jt: On the TT List you appear (to me at least) to be completely
taken with what you call the "larger context" and the "Christ event".
JD: Indeed I am quite
taken
In a message dated 4/10/2005 3:51:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 06:37:32 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can't afford to allow Romans 14:4 to a principle of truth, so you limit it's usefulness to the meants only question and continue uneffected
How do we reconcile Matt 22:14 "many are called; few are chosen" with passages like Rev. 7:9 "more than could be counted .. from every nation and tribe?"
Do we realize that statements such as Matt 22:14 ARE LIMITED to the Gospel Accounts? When Christ speaks of "many are called and few are
Just responding to your response
JD. The personal turn is on your end - you are the one who began the focus
on "your preaching" in response to my comment about your "larger
context theology" so where am I supposed to go from there
since I never have and probably never
will sit under your
In a message dated 4/9/2005 5:29:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just responding to your response JD. The personal turn is on your end - you are the one who began the focus on "your preaching" in response to my comment about your "larger context theology" so where am I
In a message dated 4/9/2005 5:29:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD: If you actually ever have the privilege of hearing me preach - you will change your mind about the passivitity and presumption thingy.
jt: How is what you preach different from the beliefs you have
The previous similar post was sent while I was trying to get the right "copy." Try it again. JD
In a message dated 4/9/2005 7:31:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ACtaully, I found the context -- right there under my nose. While you are pretending that I started the
I see we are back to entertaining the
"old accuser" again JD (see your final comment); why would I
need to deny this question.
It's a valid one. If the foundation for your belief is the Universalism of
Kruger,
Torrance, along with the
existentialism of Barth then how would your preaching
I'm not complaining JD, just pointing out an obvious
disconnect in what you profess. Young ppl need to know
what Joshua told Israel - We have an obligationto
set before them life and death and tell them that they need
to "Choose ye this day whom
ye will serve"
On the TT List you appear
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 09, 2005 12:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving - correction
In a message dated 4/9/2005 8:12:15 AM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If the
foundation for your belief is the Universalism of Kruger,Torrance, along
True JD, I have not extensively studied Kruger,
Torrance,and/or Barth but I have read enough
of their writings to know that I don't need to read
anymore. I guess the old adage "birds of a feather"
is true if not truth.
"My own brand of theology" as you call it is God's Word and this is
der if I'm a
relativist. This is TRUE truth!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 09, 2005 12:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving - correction
In a message dated 4/9/2005 8:12:15 AM
Just pondering some ofthese
different teachings. JD, you write:
Kruger is not into universalism- and you do not
understand his teachings, - I know he does not deal with
sin.
JD much less mine or - You don't either JD, you are into the "greater context" to which
image all scripture must
-
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 09, 2005 12:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving - correction
True JD, I have not extensively studied Kruger,
Torrance,and/or Barth but I have read enough
In a message dated 4/9/2005 8:23:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the TT List you appear (to me at least) to be completely taken with what you call the "larger context" and the
"Christ event". Indeed I am quite taken by these two considerations. The "larger context" is
In a message dated 4/9/2005 9:27:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To someone with a hammer everything looks like a nail?
Well, now you've gone and done !! How do I get this grin off my rather lovely face? Did you think of that before you wrote this?
!
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 1:42
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
Just pondering some ofthese
different teachings. JD
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005
8:19 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
In a message dated 4/9/2005 5:29:49 AM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL
In a message dated 4/9/2005 11:28:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD, youre all washed up here. YOU said that what you preach is not the same as what you write on TT. Judy asked why you would be one way on TT and another way when you preach. Then you accuse HER of getting
Sawczak
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005
12:23 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow Way Not
Loving
Judy, I have to break my silence to compliment you on your
cool thumbnail sketches! I mean it. They are delicious and so quotable. I
cracked up reading them
What ?? Put it in black and white. I said
that?? - I don't thnk so -- but here we go
again. It is not what John says about what John says --
rather, it is what the righteous right says John says that is the truth.
YOU give it a rest --- back to the shower my dear !!!
Jd
Then stop
And some people are really special,
like the little yellow school bus. Izzy
On Behalf Of Lance Muir
To someone with a hammer everything looks like a nail?
1 - 100 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
