On Wed, 29 May 2002, Donnie O. wrote:
The funny thing is that when I access the Sparc5 system directly from
the Solaris8 box through an XWindow session with the display set to 0
then everything is fine (everything appears). When I try and access the
Solaris8 box using VNC from home
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote:
Now that my high speed service provider has started to charge based on
the number of bits transacted over my line, I've gotten stingy about
bandwidth (by which I mean byte count, not bits per second). I never
realized how costly it was to use a
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Alec Hothan wrote:
Is there a way to know the version of a vncserver binary?
If you start a vnc session, look in $HOME/.vnc/*.log -- the first line
will say the version. There's probably a better way!
Mike
___
VNC-List mailing
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Wes Groleau wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
difficult for someone to get into my box by a VNC exploit. Am I
wrong? Wouldn't they have to sniff packets and decrypt to get the
password? I suppose it can be done, but I don't know that anyone is
doing it.
Unless you have
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Technology Listserves wrote:
I have had VNC up and running for a few days now, and everything works
great, except one problem. I can't use a graphical file managing
software like Nautilus. VNCserver is running on a RedHat 7.3 system.
VCNclient is running on a Windows
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, fred bapst wrote:
Is it normal that Ctrl-C, backspace or delete keys have a different
meaning through VNC ? I'm using the server on solaris, and tried
solaris+Win viewers, without being able to send a decent Ctrl-C or
backspace to my xterm...
I'm using Solaris 8 and an
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Beerse, Corni wrote:
ctrlc is one of the keys in the alttab and ctrlaltdelete
range: They are captured by the local machine.
Ctrl-c is not captured by the Windows machines on which I've used
vncviewer (NT 4.0, Win2K Pro, Win98) -- it works fine for me.
btw: What did
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Mas LIARFO wrote:
The little point that runs after the arrow makes it impossible to forget
that you are not actually using the local machine, even over a fast LAN.
But on a slow connection, having the little point is very helpful. You
know where your cursor *will* be and
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The little point that runs after the arrow makes it impossible to
forget that you are not actually using the local machine, even over
a fast LAN.
But on a slow connection, having the little point is very helpful.
You know where your
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Hans-Cees Speel wrote:
I see the same issue with Putty. It never really bugged me because I
don't use Putty in a VNC window that often (since VNC is not
encrypted, what's the point).
I use an ssh-tunnel for putty, so it does matter.
Do you mean that you use an ssh
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Tristan Richardson wrote:
OK I've spent several painful hours tracking this down (I'm not
surprised the other guy gave up - it's a #define hell :-). It turns out
to be a bug in the X server cfb code where there's a special optimised
case which only gets used on sparc
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Erik Parker wrote:
It sucks, but it was the list configuration at fault, not him. I don't
like vacation programs at all, but a lot of people use them, and some
companies require you to use them. In the list software it specifically
says 'Set Reply to: List or poster' and
I'm still using old Xvnc version 3.3, running on Solaris 8. I set up VNC
for a student and had him start it up on :10. It prompted for password,
which he entered, then I had him run vncserver :10 again to create the VNC
session. It refused saying A VNC server is already running as :10, but
it
Professor
Division of Epidemiology
University of Minnesota
http://taxa.epi.umn.edu/~mbmiller/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
I'm still using old Xvnc version 3.3, running on Solaris 8. I set up
VNC for a student
What the heck is this about?? Everyone who writes to the VNC list
receives one of these messages? --Mike -- Forwarded message
-- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 15:54:27 -0500 From: Automatic Email
Verifyer To: Mike Miller Subject: Please verify your Email address
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, David Howe wrote:
Possibly the .pid file (that vncserver checks to see if a instance is
already running) is still in the user's ~/.vnc?
No. It's perplexing. There is no sign of a pid file and vncserver -kill
:10 won't work because it can't find the pid! I don't know why
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, David Howe wrote:
Is it possible a non-vnc x-server is running on 10? or that port 5910 is
in use by some other app?
It looks like something is running on 6010, and that must be the problem.
Thanks to Corni Beerse for pointing it out!
Now to figure out what's using 6010!!
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Beerse, Corni wrote:
and whom it may concern. Recently I peeked at the iana for the official
assigned port numbers. There (http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers)
I found that the port numbers as used in VNC are NOT registered for or
assigned to vnc. However, since
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, pierre malherbaud wrote:
hello, i suscribed to the list only because i have a little problem, it
looks like my computer has been hacked using WinVNC. i think so because:
WinVNC has been installed on my computer without my intervention
[snip]
I'm sure someone else will
What would I have to do to use this patch with 3.3.6? Will it work?
Also, how exactly is a patch applied? In the past, I've read through the
thing, line by line, and figured out how to edit the files by hand. With
a big patch, that's too much work. If it matters, I'm using Solaris 8.
Best,
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Joachim Falk wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Mike Miller wrote:
Also, how exactly is a patch applied?
You need the patch programm. Install the one included with Solaris
(No I don't know where to find that one). Or get the GNU one.
I have always tried to use the Solaris
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Shing-Fat Fred Ma wrote:
Here's the thing with this new way of doing the headers. I even can't
tell if you've copied the list or not. It's not in any of the headers.
If the header doesn't show that the message went to the list, then it
didn't go to the list. You can
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Wayne Throop wrote:
I assume he's talking aobut the issue that led to autocutsel, namely,
that X has at least two different ways to cut-n-paste text. There's the
cutbuffer(s), and there's the selection(s).
I downloaded and compiled autocutsel v0.3 on my Solaris (SPARC)
Here's a simple question: Why can't VNC server and viewer just use
established SSH protocols to communicate? Incorporate OpenSSH code into
the server and PuTTY (or whatever) code into the viewer. Isn't that
workable? The keys wouldn't be encoded in the password, they would be
handled in the
hope the realVNC development team will consider this as a worthwhile
project for someday.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mike Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vrijdag 14 februari 2003 16:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: Automatic Encryption
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Illtud Daniel wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
Here's a simple question: Why can't VNC server and viewer just use
established SSH protocols to communicate? Incorporate OpenSSH code
into the server and PuTTY (or whatever) code into the viewer. Isn't
that workable
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
I am going to chirp in here again.
All this talk about incorporating code into vnc.
What is wrong with attempting to tunnel it through ssh ?
This is done in other contexts.
I do that. But can I get other users to do it? I don't think so. It's
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, John Swanson wrote:
I think Most people here understand the limitations of this encryption,
but I think a great many of us are just looking to not have passwords
going out in plain text.
They aren't going out in plan text even now. VNC uses a different
protocol for the
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, William Hooper wrote:
If No, what is the advance of Xvnc in manners of size?
Size isn't the point. Being able to have a persistent remote desktop is
the point
There are several major advantages of VNC:
(1) The state is stored on the host machine. When you reconnect
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Li Ding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem when using Xvnc on linux. When I use vncviewer from a
windows machine to connect Xvnc on linux. I get a new XWindows, NOT
the desktop I need to access. How can I access my linux destop?not the
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Mark Ganser wrote:
each student gets their own session and everything works great, except:
on the RedHat 7.3 machine certain applications will not launch from a
VNC session (including root) but will when the user logs on locally.
For example the Printer Configuration
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Steve Bostedor wrote:
Ya know, it'd be cool if there was a way to connect to the VNC port on a
computer, issue a command, and get back the flavor and version that is
running on that computer. If anybody feels like adding new features to
VNC, this would be awesome!
If
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Steve Bostedor wrote:
Ya know, it'd be cool if there was a way to connect to the VNC port on
a computer, issue a command, and get back the flavor and version that
is running on that computer. If anybody feels like adding
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, William Hooper wrote:
I agree, security through obscurity is not security. On the other hand,
reporting the version gives an attacker just another piece of
information that is not needed by an authorized client.
If the information is not needed, why is someone asking
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Dave T. wrote:
I want to label the buttons, set screen sizes, configure two terminal
windows to automatically open in each session each time I start VNC,
etc. I am currently running HP-UX 11.0, if that makes a difference.
Years ago--the last time I used CDE, which was on
I run Pine and Xvnc on my Solaris box and would love to be able to use
vncviewer on a Palm OS device to connect to the Solaris box and do my
e-mail. The Palm device (Treo 300 from Handspring) gives me always-on,
unlimited internet service through Sprint. The display size on the Treo
is 160 x 160
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Is there no information on the web that lists the differences?
I doubt it. What's the point, there is no competition between them.
It's not that they are competing to win a prize, but every user has to
make a choice. A web page designed to help
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Some other options would be to use a script to start the VNC sessions
you need on boot (there are some examples at
http://faq.gotomyvnc.com/fom-serve/cache/65.html ). Then you could move
the vncserver script out of the path.
Thanks for the link!
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Michael Herman wrote:
I would like to point out that VNC is not secure.
From the realVNC FAQ:
Is VNC secure?
The only really secure computer is one without a network. VNC
requires a password when a viewer tries to connect to a server. This password
is encrypted to
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Bjvrn Persson wrote:
If I wanted to sniff other people's VNC traffic i'd first try to find an
existing program to do this. If I couldn't find one I would:
1: use one of the existing programs that can intercept TCP sessions.
Maybe I'd have to teach it how to recognize the
If I use ssh to forward port 5801 on my local machine to port 5801 on the
vncserver machine and I also forward port 5901 on my local machine to port
5901 on the vncserver machine, can I enter this URL in my browser...
http://localhost:5801/
...I see my VNC session, and it works, but is it using
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Bill Cassady wrote:
Claimed to be faster than VNC.
But it also works *with* VNC.
Sounds interesting, but one thing that I *really* like about VNC is that
the state is stored on the vncserver end. I can go anywhere and access
the same thing. If my connection dies, vnc is
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Each is in own window. Switching between windows, check with your OS
vendor.
In MS Windows, use Alt-Tab and/or Alt-Shift-Tab. Very useful, but so many
people don't know about it. Especially helpful when in a full-screen
mode!
Mike
Once I've installed VNC on my server, I want to be able to quickly
download viewers for various OSes from wherever I am. I'm most often on
Windows machines, so I'd like to be able to quickly download a Win32
VNCviewer from some web site. Where is that web site? (I found the site
where I have to
I've been running vncviewer on Solaris to look at :1 on the localhost, but
it just hangs now. Here's the info:
Xvnc version 3.3.3
VNC viewer version 3.3.7
I've always used this command:
vncviewer -shared -truecolour -depth 24 localhost:1
(Usually using the name of the machine instead of
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Mike Miller said:
Once I've installed VNC on my server, I want to be able to quickly
download viewers for various OSes from wherever I am. I'm most often on
Windows machines, so I'd like to be able to quickly download a Win32
VNCviewer from
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, William Hooper wrote:
Mike Miller said:
Most of the viewers are freely available and redistributable, right?
So why don't we just put all of the free GPL'd binaries somewhere so
that people can just grab them quickly when needed? Then when I'm on
a Mac, say, I can
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Michelle Grant wrote:
Someone downloaded VNCviewer.exe without my permission. I would like to
uninstall it. I have read the previous messages about uninstalling it.
However, the program does not show up on my start menu, my system tray,
in my control panel or in my
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Thomas Chen wrote:
I got the vncviewer to work through SSH. Is there a way to set up the
SSH connection so that it works for the Java viewer as well? Like, say
you connect via SSH and then use java instead of vncviewer to connect.
Is there a way to tunnel that through SSH
Sorry for the extra post here, but I just want to offer a little applause
for Jerry's excellent ASCII diagrams. Nice work!! --Mike
On Thu, 28 Nov 2003, Jerry Westrick wrote:
First off, you say you can connecct to home with vnc.
+-++--+
| Office |
A friend sent me a message (not to this list), which is appended below.
He claims that Windows Terminal Services will do for me what VNC does, but
Terminal Services runs much faster. I'm wondering if he is correct. I
think he's wrong about bmp encoding, for one, but is any of it correct?
Thanks
I am sure that people can scan networks, find VNC servers, guess
passwords, etc., but this seems fairly rare. I might have seen *one* scan
for port 5900 in two years of checking daily iplogs. Things might change
any day now, so best to be cautious, but I don't imagine there have been a
lot of
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Seak, Teng-Fong wrote:
Talking about security, there's one severe bug that needs to be
corrected. Months ago, someone reported that even though we could
define a long password, but the effective number of letters is only 8
(eight)!
I've tested with VNC 4b4
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Hooper wrote:
Seak, Teng-Fong said:
Talking about security, there's one severe bug that needs to be
corrected. Months ago, someone reported that even though we could define
a long password, but the effective number of letters is only 8 (eight)!
This
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, William Hooper wrote:
If one of the platforms is limited you need to make the rest of the
software respect that limitation so that you can remain cross-platform.
(This is about password length.)
There is the server end and there is the viewer end. Why can't the
servers
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Leonard Tiritilli wrote:
A well moderated threaded forum is far from ideal technical support but
it is way ahead of the current VNC List.
[snip]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
I don't Yahoo, but YouDo. That's one of your problems.
Another possible
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prevent the user from entering passwords with 9 or more characters,
preferably with an alert saying VNC passwords are limited to 8
characters, sorry.
A number of things have been conflated in this discussion. I doubt that
the vncpasswd program on
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, William Hooper wrote:
Mike Miller said:
But that page says that VNC communicates in plain text and I've been
told repeatedly that it is using some sort of X protocol that is not
plain text. It's not encrypted, but it isn't plain text either.
This is important
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, William Hooper wrote:
In fact, the author gives the impression getting the VNC data is
easier than getting plain X11 data.
In other words, there is a continuum of difficulty and VNC is harder
to get than is plain text (e.g., telnet).
If you have the traffic you
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Wayne Throop wrote:
I didn't see anybody else mention it, but it's worth noting
that the use of plaintext here is a cryptogaphic technical term,
meaning the unencrypted form, as contrasted with ciphertext.
The use in data exchange [] is in plaintext does not imply
that
We may have discussed this before, but that seems to be true of most
issues on this list! I want to be able to run Xvnc on a Linux box and
allow users to connect to it, but I would prefer that they use SSH tunnels
from outside the network. I see no way to force them to use SSH tunnels.
If I set
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, William Hooper wrote:
Mike Miller said:
I see no way to force them to use SSH tunnels.
If I set up VNC for them, they can connect without the tunnel and I can't
stop them.
You can only allow connections from localhost.
Thanks. That is a good idea. I really want
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People have been asking for built in encryption for years, and they have
yet to implement it.
It's probably a really difficult job to program it.
I'll tell you -- every time I say something to nearly anyone about VNC, if
they've heard of it, but
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Corni Beerse wrote:
This message clearly shows how and where Micro$oft makes abuse and reuse
of terms: The protocol that is used by VNC is called RDP. AFAIK, that's
a kind of open protocol.
Then M$ started those stuff they call RemoteDesktop for which they user
the
On Wed Aug 25 23:49:00 2004, b kwok wrote:
Want to verify and confirm if this attack sucess by sending more than 60
connections request to VNC server on windows platforms, any fix for that?
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-08/1068.html
I hope this will be fixed soon.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Ran Sasson wrote:
As said numerous times before (along the years of VNC..) :
http://www.uk.research.att.com/archive/vnc/sshvnc.html
http://www.realvnc.com/swish-e/search/vnc-list?pos=0action=searchquery=SSH
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
The upcoming VNC Server Enterprise Edition (
http://www.realvnc.com/products/enterprise/ ) includes protection from
this and a class of similar but more advanced attacks. This protection
will also be included in the next VNC Server 4 GPL release.
I
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, William Hooper wrote:
Mike Miller said:
[snip]
I'm not understanding this. Take Linux for example - suppose I use SSH
port forwarding, but VNC is still there on port 5901.
Port 5901 is firewalled off from everything but localhost. The only way
to cause the issue
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, William Hooper wrote:
People will choose convenience over security no matter what you do.
It will be better, of course, to work SSH into the VNC product
I disagree. Encryption is something best left to programs that
specialize in encryption. Why try to maintain your own
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, James Weatherall wrote:
The DoS attack only affects VNC Server for Windows - you shouldn't
therefore lose data as a consequence of an attack.
There is no need to set up a firewall, only to use the LocalHost option
to restrict connections to those originating from the local
I am running this on Red Hat Linux...
Xvnc version 4.0b4 - built Sep 5 2003 13:04:00
Underlying X server release 4030, The XFree86 Project, Inc
I want to be able to copy/cut/paste between Windows and the Xvnc session.
How is that accomplished? I thought that running autocutsel on Linux
I'm running VNC on Linux but get errors about GLX. I found this highly-
relevant post:
http://www.realvnc.com/pipermail/vnc-list/2004-May/045347.html
Here's my question: Is there a page that describes step-by-step how to
install Xvnc on Linux so that OpenGL will work?
Thanks in advance for
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Asher, Scott wrote:
Run vncconfig -nowin (or -iconic, whatever you'd prefer). See the
vncconfig man page.
Wow. I totally missed the boat - that's a nice change in VNC. It looks
like the functionality is further enhanced with autocutsel, so now I will
add both to my
Is there any info on the timeline for the upcoming release of the VNC
Server Enterprise Edition for Unix?
Are any of you using the Enterprise Edition on Windows? Liking it?
Mike
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Angelo Sarto wrote:
You prolly really want vnc-enterprise
This will allow you to tie the login to a user account and then your
security will be the same as you have for login security.
How is the UNIX version of Enterprise VNC coming along?
I didn't see Brandon's question
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently downloaded VNC and was able to set it up and access my
WinXP Pro computer using another computer, so I know it's working. Is
it possible to use my Palm Treo to access my WinXP Pro computer over the
internet? If so would it be possible
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Mike Miller wrote:
Only one of my users is having this problem, as far as I know. VNC only
updates on cursor movement. If he types in an xterm, nothing happens
until the cursor is moved. On the other hand, I think it updates
*eventually* without cursor movement
On Red Hat Linux running Xvnc version 4.0b4, starting gnome-session as
follows...
#!/bin/sh
xrdb $HOME/.Xdefaults
xsetroot -solid grey
vncconfig -nowin
exec autocutsel
/usr/bin/xterm -geometry 80x51+78+25 -ls -T [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exec gnome-session
...we had a problem where the gnome-session
Is the Pass special keys directly to server functionality of VNCviewer
not available when the client is running Windows 98? Using the same
viewer on Windows 2000 and Windows 98, I find that it only works correctly
on Windows 2000. Is this how it works, or am I doing something wrong?
Mike
--
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, James Weatherall wrote:
VNC Viewer already includes support for this (broken in 4.1 but will be
fixed in the 4.1.1 release!). VNC Server supports either remoting the
entire desktop or an individual monitor.
Has anyone compared Synergy with VNC for use with multiple
I have a VPN setup and can connect to it. When I try to use VCN viewer
4, I enter my password to connect and then I get a window that is all
black. I move my mouse around and get nothing. The host is not having
any troubles and can connect from computers outside their network.
I am running a
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) [Contractor] wrote:
I have to agree - I asked the same type of questions about Enterprise
VNC for Unix (which costs $$!) twice and have not gotten any response...
Anyone?
I can only add my agreement. My interpretation is that soon does not
really
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Erik Soderquist wrote:
keep those emails, have a lawyer look at the license agreement, and if
still no response, you at least have records of attempting to contact
and acting in good faith. I'm not a lawyer, so try that at your own
risk.
No license agreement applies to
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Erik Soderquist wrote:
huh? it was my understanding that people were using vnc, so how could it
be nonexistent?
We're talking about our questions about the forthcoming releases of two
currently nonexistent programs: VNC Personal Edition...
http://www.vnc.com/download.html
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Collins, Kevin (MindWorks) [Contractor] wrote:
The original legal question had nothing to do with either of these
versions of the software (directly) - it was about the legality of
selling another software package for installing VNC.
OK. I guess another thread got mixed
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Brian K. White wrote:
Saying that they will only deal with realvnc and that they are not
obligated to honor the license of public code they are using until
realvnc approaches them or responds to their approaches is NOT
acceptable unless they are not in fact using anything
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, William Hooper wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
RealVNC has developed an Enterprise edition that is not being
distributed under the GPL. I assume that the Enterprise edition
contains GPL code from the old RealVNC. I also believe that this is OK
because the RealVNC team owns
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Mark Jacobs wrote:
http://www.planetdns.net
This one looks especially bad - they are receiving rewards and making
money out of, what looks like, Wez's work!
Where is the evidence that PlanetDNS has VNC inside?
I'm interested in this issue because I'm not sure how we can
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Jim Brown wrote:
Where is the evidence that PlanetDNS has VNC inside?
http://www.planetdns.net/premstd/v2.0/onlinehelp/dialogs/mshvnc_copyright_notice.html
Great. Thanks.
Next question: Are they violating the GPL? Has anyone bought the product
and found that it is
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Steve Bostedor wrote:
This is all just fantasy talk, anyways. We KNOW that theirs is a
modified VNC because they spell it out on their website. Who cares, I
guess. It looks like everyone's doing it. Integrity and doing the
right thing just doesn't matter for anything
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Steve Bostedor wrote:
No, I downloaded the shareware version and requested to purchase the
source. I was ignored. There was no copy of the GPL and no release
notes of changes to the VNC source. All a violation of the GPL.
Thanks Steve. Another one for the Wall of Shame.
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Chris Branas wrote:
I've read all through the documentation, etc. but I can't seem to fix
this with the prescribed methods. I want to run vnc to connect to kde. I
am running the command vncserver :10 and vnc starts.
I can run Xvnc on all but :10. The reason is that port
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Lou Kamenov wrote:
Is there such thing as VNC Enterprise Edition for FreeBSD, theres one
for Linux alright?
Thanks for pointing out that the Unix Enterprise Editions (Solaris, Linux
and HP/UX) are now available. If there was an announcement, I missed it.
I am a little
In the past I have compiled against libwrap.a so that I can use tcp
wrappers to block clients in certain domains. I actually block major
areas like Europe, Asia and Latin America. I would like to be able to do
this with VNC Enterprise Edition. Is that possible?
Mike
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Andy Bruce - softwareAB wrote:
I have to agree with Steve that this is, for all practical purposes, a
non-existent security risk. The only things that could go wrong:
a. Somebody is sniffing the packet stream while the VNC passwords are
being exchanged, and, during that 20
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Mike Miller wrote:
If you were using Windows he could start up another VNC desktop that you
might not notice...
Sorry -- I meant to say if you were using UNIX. I assume this would not
be possible in Windows.
Mike
___
VNC-List
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Erik Soderquist wrote:
is it just me or is this list double posting everything?
I believe the problem was coming from the security list that some of our
messages were CC'd to. So probably (I hope) only a few of us were
affected (those who were in the CC list of the repeated
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Rex Dieter wrote:
Until now, I've never encountered a vendor who provided rpms who didn't
either offer the src.rpm and/or specfile.
If you had asked them for those files, maybe they would have given them to
you. I think you told them that they *had* to give the file(s) to
We've used the free VNC for awhile to view machines outside our office,
but our IT guys are too nervous about punching through our firewall to
allow others to view our machines. I think they're too cautious.
Question: If we buy the VNC version that is advertised as more secure,
will it
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Erik Soderquist wrote:
To be clear, the VNC viewer that uses encryption is free, but but you
cannot use the older viewer.
not according to realvnc's web page:
http://www.realvnc.com/products/features.html
according to that, the free one does not include encryption
I
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
