Is Pr Haldeman still alive ?
do you think you could make him publish or simply say something today ?
I feel it is time to break the wall.
2015-02-11 17:38 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
*From:* Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
…20 year old VIMEO video on controversial new
Hi,
about recent Ni+LiAlH4 experiments done by Parkhomov and MFMP
on facebook group, Yevgen Barsukov propose that it is a chemical reaction:
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/920127711351262
After decomposition of LiAlH4, pure lithium is left. Lithium is reacting
2015-02-05 17:03 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can criticize
it.
This seems the most probable.
That is a fact that LENR does not LOOK credible (for uninformed couch
potatoes).
Question is what it IS...
the trick of
Hi all.
As feared before, it seems the Lugano test may only show a reactor at
900C...
maybe a little higher is anyway the emissivity is reduced in the waveband
7.5-13um, .
This maybe an explanation for another mystery : the apparent negative
temperature coefficient observed from 450 to 800W
If
I cannot imagine someone, especially a corp executive, is enough a gambler
to give a non-functional reactor to physicist team, expecting they don't
find a way to calibrate it up to target temperature, to use a known
emissivity dot or fluid, to install a thermocouple, a bolometer, or simply
to test
yes, moore law talk of size of transistor, but that is linked to speed,
complexity, RAM size...
there are many different moore laws and when they interact with dimensions
in real world it created big problems.
for exemple disk and RAM memory capacity grow faster than the I/O to talk
to the disk.
a friend of mine (of my Engineering school) did a serious Steam rocket.
advantage in france is that steam reactors is not regulated.
it was water at critical point, in a titanium steel tank.
specific impulsion was pathetic but it worked.
2015-01-23 20:45 GMT+01:00 Brad Lowe
one point to support your vision jed, no grid, agains what I propose as
possible, a microgrid, can be found with It, Internet.
if you see internet it is both like a grid with utilities, the internet
provider, servers, sites, DNS, routers ... and individual resources, PC,
personal wifinetwork...
you are right that regulation of the grid is essential for safety, and
stability.
Of course I assumed that the engineering regulation would be respected,
the regulation i talk abou are not about safety but just to protect
utilisties as often regulation are exploited by politicians.
just putting 2
where does came the idea that DC is safer ?
as engineer during high power electronic course I was clearly taught that
100V DC was sure deadly with no chance to survive (you get stuck on the
wire until you die), while 220AC is quite forgiving with a chance to escape
100 time a second...
is that
my vision on evolution of electricity is based on jed vision.
the big question is how the utilities, the grid will react.
if the grid moves quickly to a microgrid, a mesh-grid, a smart producer
grid, then people will be happy to save some investment on their CHP with a
sharing platform.
If as I
one point about blackswan not so black.
even Taleb agree that most blackswan could be predicted.
But the people who took the decision could not see it.
most blackswan, even fukushima, were in fact predictable with existing data.
most blackswan are simply whiteswan kept in a dark room.
Subprime
it seems to be a thermionic device...
a heat to power converter ?
2015-01-16 1:12 GMT+01:00 Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com:
Greetings Vortex-L,
An invention by some Highly Talented Researchers.
I am clueless.
http://www.google.com/patents/US8575842
Applications...aircraft and other
can it be connected with the work of Dennis Letts and ENEA, recently
published?
I feel it is an interesting signature of the NAE, allowing to investigate
it's characteristic in a phenomenological way :
size, charges, location...
2015-01-14 5:18 GMT+01:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
Jack,
Michel Vandenberghe published a short message about this weekend conference
in Oxford.
I relayed it.
as you can read I think that it is a turn in the battle, as the presence of
an Airbus official (plus journalist and academic people) may sadly have
more importance than any calorimetry.
it move to an accusation of having hidden an excel file...
conspiracy...
now my tactic is to force the people denying LENR to be clear out the
conspiracy theory they support so witness see it is huge and impossible.
conspiracy is the easy answer to things one cannot accept...
not only in science
:00 Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com:
it move to an accusation of having hidden an excel file...
conspiracy...
now my tactic is to force the people denying LENR to be clear out the
conspiracy theory they support so witness see it is huge and impossible.
conspiracy is the easy answer
2015-01-10 15:01 GMT+01:00 Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
:
That is the question we need to answer. Typically to validate or disprove
cold fusion you make sure to draw a representative sample of the old
results and do a serious examination to evaluate the evidences
cold
please don't say you predicted the problem of DGT demo.
I was observing the critic and as I say, all was criticized as all fraud...
electricity, water, thermocouple, ... as i say deniers are a dead clock
totally useless to find reality.
Electricity and thermal measurement were OK as Luca Gamberale
2015-01-09 0:00 GMT+01:00 David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com:
Many of the cold fusion skeptics conclude that LENR is not possible
because there is no theory to support it.
An article describe that
done,
question is if it will be moderated. They won't dare.
anyway question now is not to convince, but to deliver to the industry.
2015-01-07 20:39 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
your last sentence is enough to understand
the translation is done
http://feedly.com/i/subscription/feed/http://gsvit.wordpress.com/feed/
don't kill the messenger Jed ;-)
your last sentence is enough to understand they screw up somewhere.
2015-01-07 3:39 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Dear Jed,
I have spoted that GSVIT critic of your position on the Mizuno experiment
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/01/05/misura-calorimetrica-sulla-pompa-md-6k-n-utilizzata-da-tadahiko-mizuno/
through google translate it seems to claim that the pump heat about 4W, not
1W
probably you will
I don't think that the 2mg are a problem , that is more the number of
grains analysed.
it is like poling. the size of the sample have to be bigger if there is
tiny minorities. few samples are ok to measure the majority.
the problem like on polling is more about bias on the sampling, like taking
It is hard for me not to consider that currenbt oil price crash is linked
to LENR, but I agree that the losers will desperately ignore their fate
http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Groupthink%20IOM%202012_07_02%20BW.pdf
the more their fate is certain, the more their peers can punish them,
since long I imagined the symptom that LENR is accepted by interesting
people (this mean not the media or academics)
- some tycoon will be interested, and many wil divest from fossils nuke and
renewable
- some big corps /consortium will send their skunkwork and innovation
divisions to contact
-
thanks very much peter.
I cannot see the image as it requires an account.
2014-12-28 10:44 GMT+01:00 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
I could translate the text per se in 30 minutes, the images have created
me problems- it is fine that Nikita has done the task.
Rossi has said he agrees with
It seems to be a member post, not an official kitco announce.
I value that article only as showing interest by someone mainstream, and
the fact it was not moderated by the company.
my experience as tech-watcher community-watcher is that the huge problem of
cold fusion is that information cannot
Is there a serious belief that Science is separated from politics ?
History is incoherent with that claim, and current history too.
to be honest I observe that strangely corporate and business politics is
often more politically neutral (only relative) than academic politics which
is very
on 22passi, some skeptic refers to an old story of 1995 about CETI
I don't understand all, but it seems not to be honest story? (remind me
some greek sad joke, but I wait for confirmation)
it seems covered by NET
I have a strange idea from current ambiance and connection with indonesia...
Basic income could be connected to agrarian reform.
Usually agrarian refor don't give subsidies, but simply redistribute assets
to small actors, the farmers, who can exploit them.
if robots take all our manual jobs,
2014-12-09 1:38 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Maybe they are trying to repair their errors.
and why not with more than correcting the report ?
Franck Ackalnd digged that old article on a sucessful LENr experiment in 89
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/19/us/stanford-reports-success.html
I know there was many false positive at the beginning...
what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ?
It seems too short to have
so it is good...
I remember about Fire From Ice that there was very negative impact of some
false positive
it was simply isolated failure that was exploited ?
2014-12-07 23:41 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
I know there was many
Is it really the same size, If I read well the diameter' is much smaller,
making much less radiative surface to dissipate heat ?
2014-12-08 2:50 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
Oops
The MFMP has built a Rossi replica called the “dog-bone”… it is the same
size and weight as the
Hi,
I start to make a quick analysis of the Lugano test result.
There is probably big errors, since my approach is bachelor level (not my
job).
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/959-IR-Cam-brochure/?postID=2001#post2001
From the manufacturer documentation it appears that IR cam
Not sure it is a group with a working or promising reactor...
2014-11-24 18:29 GMT+01:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/11/24/prometeon-srl-addresses-e-cat-licensee-status/
Someone has taken customers away from Rossi and IH, who could it be? This
alterative to
Rossi not a serious businessman, promising more than what he can deliver?
Cherokee not tender with others companies, trying to close competitors?
is it so surprising?
2014-11-24 18:44 GMT+01:00 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com:
A very condemning statement from Promethion (E-Cat licensee) --- they
no,
if you search you see many LENr startup without much concrete but sometime
with good network, good team, and thus potential to build a technology.
2014-11-24 20:20 GMT+01:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
luca gamberale?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Beside what you say, there is some common error.
This is to imagine that education can help people be more rational.
In fact education is there not only to give tools and informations, but
also to structure the mind to accept those tools and information.
This is well explaine by Thomas Kuhn as
Hi,
About Lugano test I have heard an interesting argument about the emissivity
controversy.
Someone said simply that what the IR cam measure is the IR radiation, and
that whatever is the emissivity from the IR cam result you have an estimate
of the radiated heat...
then the error in emissivity
I agree that it is just anomalous measurement letting fear/hope
reactionless engine.
the problem is that most skeptics don't simply ast for
REPLICATE IT MORE TO PROVE IT BAD
but DONT WASTE MONEY REPLICATING...
they als claim it is a student error ignoring all de things that have
been checked,
maybe I read it too fast, but in fact it seems this patent does not patent
NiH reaction, but assume the fuel exist and have some characteristic... it
seems to patent the reactor...
2014-11-08 0:06 GMT+01:00 James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com:
The patent is invalid. The catalyst has to be
does anyone have analyses the color code they show on Wikipedia?
2014-11-05 7:55 GMT+01:00 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
From the other pictures, it is pretty clear that Rossi is using a sheathed
k-type
an idea to check from the surprising claim in the report that one of the
wire effective current was abo the sum of the (equals) two others...
after some rethinking, this imply all current are synchronous...
this is a monophase devices, with simply 2 coils...
what for ? only speculation that it may
[mailto:alain.coetm...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *Alain Sepeda
*Sent:* lundi 3 novembre 2014 22:51
*To:* Vortex List
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]: New Rossi lab photo has much information
an idea to check from the surprising claim in the report that one of the
wire effective current was abo the sum
It seems that for hot fusion ising FLIR camera is quite common
https://www.fusie-energie.nl/sites/default/files/2013_53004.pdf
can someone competent interpret that study?
I've caught that industrial article
http://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=92
what I am searching is an
from my community watch it seems LENR is quite popular among Russian
pro-putin supporters... to break the blocus that USA is trying to
establish by current tactics.
be careful about information around Rossia. the level of disinformation is
as huge as WMD, ISIS, Syria,Iran... in fact it is the
measurements
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00348-010-0912-2
it seems to be rich document, and I cannot analyse them really
maybe also they can give hin to more competent readers in finding even
better resources
2014-11-02 11:52 GMT+01:00 Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com:
It seems
reference can reinstall trust.
2014-11-02 16:56 GMT+01:00 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com:
*From: *Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
*Sent: *Sunday, November 2, 2014 4:17:39 A
and an interesting reference article
Infrared thermography for convective heat transfer measurements
http
too bad.
do you think it is anyway possible that COP=1 even if 3.6 is uncertain ?
usin just emissibity it seems simply impossible that COP=1.
it would imply crazily high and low emissivity for alumina depending on
temperature ?
anyway in that domain, doubt even on the amplitude only is deadly.
we don't know how the current is switcher, and it seems to be not a Delta
but a V wiring...
there are triac, unknown circuitry.
it is funny to see many skeptics so prompt to assume there is no complexity
in the device, just to assume the wattmeter is broke.
the wattmeter is much more reliable
2014-10-24 23:14 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
McKubre never reported a 3% gain. Even with his calorimeter that would be
in the margin of error at the bottom of the scale, although he can detect
the difference between, say, 40% and 43%. As I recall, McKubre reported
gains
If you stabilize the current at I0 I think that the question of average is
solved.
you have
U(t)=U0+R(t)I0
P(t)=U(t)I0
what is proposed here is that R(t) is hugely unpredictable and changing
quickly.
in fact if you measure U(t) average over the time period, you have simply
the power injected.
Barry Kort on Dr bob blog reported challenging critiques of McKubre
experiments
http://www.drboblog.com/cbs-60-minutes-on-cold-fusion/#comment-37932
maybe some already have the debunking, the correction... i imagien it is
addressed:
About a year after CBS 60 Minutes aired their episode on
goal of a patent is not only to prevent others to copy your technology,
but mostly to prevent competitors to use your own technology.
patent don't work very well, but their main effect is that some patent
troll can block real innovators.
this is why people like amazon patent thinks like photo of
speculation on the inconel, the photography are good for question, but
theres too many uncertainties...
maybe the resistor is not at all inconel, and the inconel is only used for
connecting wires, or they are not even the classic inconel but some
variant...
for the color, may main hypotheis is
their theory get more and more crazy...
this guys ridicule 9/11 truthers but they behave the same.
2014-10-18 0:37 GMT+02:00 James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com:
/. just posted a story debunking cold fusion
Have at it, men and Ruby!
this seems a mystery but maybe it is the key.
as far as I understand your discussion, it seems impossible Ni particles
surface structure stay stable even at 1000C... it won't be liquid, but will
be aggregated too easily...
when something works and there is something like a problem, maybe it is
When I read Beaudette key page, I thing that like dinosaurs they did not
evolve since 1989
Unfortunately, *physicists did not generally claim expertise in
calorimetry*, the measurement of calories of heat energy. Nor did they
countenance clever chemists declaring hypotheses about nuclear physics.
yes Eric,
I notice many critics just show that many people cannor manage uncertainty,
unknown, the phi 1/0...
there have to thing with a prediction scenario, not with alternative
stories that they weight as more or less credible.
moreover they cannot backtrack, like a prolog engine can do... they
it is too late.
there are already serious guys, like Elforsk who know that their old
business is dead,already... question is when.
some even sell insurance to be in the game not too late.
2014-10-17 15:18 GMT+02:00 Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com:
James--
I agree with your conclusion about
the emissivity was used, it was not the blackbody equation but is not that
the greybody equation (correct term?) ?
anyway what have to be the sensitivity error to explain the apparent COP ?
naively I assume that the emissivity during the calibration have to be much
much higher than assumed and
Hi all,
again I try to prepare arguments for deniers.
Precision is not my problem...
The problem with the e-cat test, as McKubre said is tha the calibration was
not at 1250C/1400C but at 450C
now if you are sincerely skeptic, and not totally conspiracy theorist, you
have to admit that the
woh well said.
now he accuse Ugg of having beaten his wife and hidden his pile of dry wood
from the locals... which prove fire does not exist...
note that Pomp state that denying hand-fire and ugg is not the same...
but ugg making fire with hand is extraordinary...
because hand-fire is forbidden
one things to notice on triphase speculation
previous e-cat where mono phase.
triphase is easier to manage in industrial resort.
beside rotating field as in an engine, triphase allows to make an
absolutely constant power (the sum of instantaneous power of 3 phase is
constant)... however the
(increase of thermal
resistance)...
but convection does not diminish with heat?
did I undertand well?
2014-10-14 22:09 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
- is there a simple way , with minimal assumption, to be sure that
the COP1
Look
One detail is how does the e-cat work when in after-death mode (SSM).
One mystery for me is the powder not to melt, hotter and the around...
I feel E-cat are very well engineered... we can be surpised like physicists
were by felischmanpons calorimeter...
2014-10-15 18:24 GMT+02:00 Bob Higgins
jone...@pacbell.net:
*From:* Alain Sepeda
you forgot the clear logic... it is a product of fusion,
Fusion of what? Please state clearly the reaction you have in mind.
All we are asking for is some semblance of science here.
problem is there is no motive, and strong opposite motiveµ.
he have no explanation for that, it cost much, it bring only doubt,
moreover it may mean tha the reactor consume nickel, that it was
exhausted...
we have a complex phenomenon called LENR, that clearly does not respect the
free-space
you explain the new shape of the reactor covering, with the
||
||
||
shapes, as a required increase of convection ?
what I see in that reactor is dozens of engineering innovations, not so
sexy as LENR, but the kind engineer do everyday to make rocket fly.
2014-10-13 23:21 GMT+02:00 David
the gamma is only required if
- the reaction is not zeromomentum (you see why I support that geometry is
the kety adn reaction have to be geometrically symmetric)
- or energy cannot be transmited as another potential energy to an object
that have enoug energy state to dissipate it in smaller
the hypothesis that ther is a huge artifact in the measurement is more
rational than fraud.
Since rossi and IH are baffled by the result, this is a big option...
anyway that it is real and Rossi don't underatdn all the reactio is not at
all to exclude.
never forget we have no theory.
You should
I think we can eliminate 2 kind of impossible reaction :
- those involving free neutrons that would be thermalized even rarely, and
detected
- those not geometrically balanced which would creat a gamma tha would be
detected.
geometry is the key because of CoM.
probably the electron is too, but
Could another team make another test with McKubre other advices ?
I'm afraid Rossi is tired of that, but it would help the others groups too.
Maybe is it useless, as business circles seems aware...
but what about citizen...
the problem is to find volunteer that are ok to ruin their career but
trick, easier
than hotfusion; if easy for 3 why not for 6 ?
2014-10-14 15:03 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
*From:* Alain Sepeda
6p+3e-li6 (add the neutrino)
it can be made zero momentum
I take it from hydroton theory, with a possibility that it is not 1D, but
3D
Hi
Following Mickael McKubre critics, I posted a question for the testers but
some here may answer with the public data
- assuming the convection factor is maybe badly represented
(underestimated for the dummy, over represented for the active) because the
dummy was tested at lower
as usual proposing a test like isotopic analysis befire having gathere all
the conspiracy theories from a previous test, is the best way to be mudied
by crazy theories...
note how they no more attack the power
the only critics that I'(ve sen are :
- the isotopic analysis, rossi presence, no
I have one idea, linked to my pet theory (don't laugh guys, I have stolen
most of it to competent people; the stupid part is my adding).
as Godes says, most of external Li must have gone.
and if there was some in the powder maybe it was inside the active part,
why not produced by the reaction...
you have to add to the losses of the turbine, the losses of the battery
required, (the rest , electronics can be efficient) that may be 50% from in
to out later
maybe supercapacitor/nonsupercapacitor can help, or freewheel?
2014-10-13 2:08 GMT+02:00 Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com:
did not rossi already answer that question, by saying that the conductor
inside were not so trivial...
doped conductor he says...
we should be careful not to take unfounded assumption, then deduce false
things from that...
maybe is it more simple to start from the instruments and guess how it is
It lakes good question to ask, because we speculate on unknown data.
It is hard to imagine they have made student mistakes...
the transparency question look less student stupid than others, but
someone handling an IR cam can easily understand the the measurement suffer
artifact...
as asked Jed,
you forgot the clear logic...
it is a product of fusion,
2014-10-13 16:13 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
*From:* Alain
… even if very few Li6 was produced, if most natural Li6/7 is gone, it
can looks like a huge enrichment while it is tiny local production.
Yes, I
And we still have the problem of a system calibrated at 450C being used at
1400C
the main question is why this F**G reactor is at 1400C while it have
less power in...
OK, I'm not an expert, but this challenge my understanding.
2014-10-13 16:35 GMT+02:00 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com:
The
his objection on triac can be ignored.
powermeter are designed for much more complex waveform than triphase triac.
they can manage polyphase synchronous rectifiers.
PCE830 analyse harmonics up to number 99, band with is many kHz...
moreover the testers brought other instruments, and had total and
We should be careful as contamination, mixing, enrichment, mays trouble the
result... it is not a total analysis but a relative composition.
one possibility is that Li6 is not caused by fission/spallation, but by
fusion
or fusion/decay
why not t+e+t - li6+2e
or like iwamura 6 deuteron
people should separate the idea that the test was screwed up, debunked,
from the fact that all skeptic claims it is screwed up and debunked...
for now, with the parenthesis of alumina closed (low transmitance at IR cam
wavelength) the test is solid.
note also that the skeptic carefull avoid the
the key argument is that we don't have a theory on how it works, and we
have no idea if Ni62 is active, an ash, or anything...
heat is produced, and this man have to learn calorimetry like Huizenga,
Parks,
and most nuclear physicist who imagine that they are the center of the
world, and disdain
I think you all made the job (respect to Jed BTW, as usual)
1- the window of transparency can be real for some alumina materials, but
not in the wavelength that the IRcam use (7um)
2- if the IRcam was troubled by the white light, the bright zone would be
much hotter for the IR cam. the IRcam
the only reasonable question, probably because I'm not expert, is the
impact of the alumina transparency.
anyway if one forget the absolute temperature and power, just comparing
colors at given power says the E-cat works.
that is my sanity check.
what is funny , or sad, is that when facing
this question can change the COP, not the bottom line :
at lower input power, the temperature is much higher for the active version.
2014-10-10 7:40 GMT+02:00 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is wonderfully
I think you exagerrate to the point of non sense.
even if goatguy make a real point it is just changing the values of the
temperature and the power.
not the fact that COP1, and even 1
one reactor with less energy in, get more bright than one with more power
getting in.
maybe COP is not 3.2 but
what impact does it have about the question whether the blank when powered
with more energy, is brighting much less than the one with one gram more of
magic powder ?
to the point that the things inside the reactor bright more than the
resistors ...
if the skeptics are really skeptic, they have
Hi,
among the skeptic argument one of the only that is not laughable is the one
of goatguy...
maybe is it because I don't understand it well...
He seems to say
- that alumina is not a grey body, but transparent, and that emissivity
must be mixed with translucidity when considering the radiation
it is open peer review.
Pomp start to propose critic. he is desperate. he should join 9/11
truthers. (sorry guys).
as Beaudette stated we should focus on heat, not nuclear ashes. this is the
key
even if physicist don't understand heat, engineers, thus investors, do
understand heat.
my bet is
this is an old tactic that Beaudette debunked.
the physicist ignore voluntarily that heat above chemistry level is a
nuclear ash.
maybe Jed can make a better historical perspective than me.
as I've read, the chemist were so bad in particle detection, and physicist
so bad in calorimetry, that
bad logic
even a fraudster cannot change the physics of heat.
a fraudster need to control his environment. he makes pony show.
he ensure condition for his fraud. he does not let people play with his
reactor, choose methods...
the fraud hypotheis are empty... they don't even consider the
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect that hydrogen is the fuel,
and that Ni is just modified.
that the surface of the powder is pure Ni62 maye be simply that it is
cooked by the reactions, stay stable, and
beware of the streelight effect.
we have no isotopic evidence about hydrogen and helium
one of my hypothesis is that hydrogen is fused with symmetric p-e-p d-e-d
t-e-t and fission, and anecdotal fusion with heavy compounds like Li or
Ni, or Fe, of even number of hydrogen as iwamura observed...
moreover the various methods gave different result, suggesting that surface
is very different from deeper.
it is expected as it happen the same for others LENr experiments ...
there are very complex transmutation in the craters of LENR electrodes
2014-10-09 9:20 GMT+02:00 Stefan Israelsson Tampe
201 - 300 of 1250 matches
Mail list logo
