@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:11 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the
one guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this
subject any longer. Well, other than the fact
of respect for the 11th commandment is annoying.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter Gluck
To: VORTEX
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I was not insulted at all. Everybody is ignorant in some areas and fast
thinking comes
...@gmail.com
*To:* VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:56 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I was not insulted at all. Everybody is ignorant in some areas and fast
thinking comes only with exercise. I discover new words on a daily basis
e.g at wordsmith.org
have dropped it
until you decided to take a swipe at me again with your post below about the
11th commandment.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter Gluck
To: VORTEX
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
is annoying.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Peter Gluck
To: VORTEX
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I was not insulted at all. Everybody is ignorant in some areas and fast
thinking comes only with exercise. I
.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
*To:* VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:56 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I was not insulted at all. Everybody is ignorant in some areas and fast
thinking comes
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I was not insulted at all. Everybody is ignorant in some areas and fast
thinking comes only with exercise. I discover new words on a daily basis
e.g at wordsmith.org and in other sources; if I don't
@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 12:40 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
If the world is only 6000 years old, the sum of all Egyptian dynasties
go up to 5000 years. No, there was no biblical flood, at least.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
This will be my last response on this subject
***Not quite the case, is it? Jesus says let your Yes be Yes. In your
case on this thread it is yes, but
his own family to feed. He was not married unless you want to believe Dan
Brown.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
*To:* John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 12:32 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial
I'll try one more time although there is little hope for one as
radicalised as you. Take a lesson from the high priests who would not
believe Jesus' message even when he rose from the dead but would rather
bribe the guards to stop others believing the truth. Don't try to
destroy evidence like
That isn't fair because... he said he wouldn't respond any more on this
subject.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:24 AM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
I'll try one more time although there is little hope for one as
radicalised as you. Take a lesson from the high priests who would not
believe
We are talking rational history here, right?
Google hits for
historicity of Bhagavad Gita : 3
historicity of Jesus : about 214,000
Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad Gita,
do you really believe these are historical accounts? Their answer is
basically no,
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting
ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned
The Biblical stuff has other venues.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
posting which I think is
this thread reminds me of this scene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpkWT5voTSE
harry
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The Biblical stuff has other venues.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey guys is
nickel nanostructures won't sinter and melt, his theory
really is dead, no matter how elegant and esoteric the rest of the theory is.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Steve High
To: Vortex
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial
*To:* Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
posting which I think
From Axil:
...
This lack of control has never been solved and is one reason why Rossi's
reactor has not been certified and released as a safe product that does
not explode.
I agree.
Regardless of what theory might best explain the excess heat being generated
from Rossi's
This may be an opinion not held by many, but I believe that DGT has solved
the control problem. This is a fallout of how the two different pumping
methods work.
It seems like a simple matter to add a thermostat to the design. The max
safe temperature is reached as determined by the thermostat,
is.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
*To:* Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved
High diamondweb...@gmail.com
*To:* Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his
But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the one
guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this
subject any longer. Well, other than the fact that he hasn't kept his
word, it would be a good plan to have the discussion on this thread.
On Sat,
Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating temperature were the
nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat is produced. That range
is between about 400C
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the one
guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this subject
any longer. Well, other than
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
But this might be the right venue for Axil's latest theory because the one
guy who introduced bibilical stuff has said he wouldn't comment on this
subject any longer. Well, other than the fact that he hasn't kept his
word, it would be a good plan
is dead, no matter how elegant and esoteric the
rest of the theory is.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
*To:* Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Hey guys
: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore. If
you are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem.
***bullshit. Your
of the theory is.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com
*To:* Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric
insult my friend, Have at it.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar
...@gmail.com
*To:* Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating
could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout
posting which I
:* Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 10:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Everyone knows that I meant to not comment
:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff anymore.
If you are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your problem.
***bullshit. Your point
:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Everyone knows that I meant to not comment on religious stuff
anymore. If you are too dumb to realize that, well my friend, that is your
problem
17, 2014 1:35 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating temperature were
the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat is produced. That
range is between about 400C to 1100C. This is the subcritical temperature
:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 1:35 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating
temperature were the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat
:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 1:35 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating temperature were
the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat is produced. That
range is between about 400C to 1100C. This is the subcritical
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating
temperature were the nickel nanostructures do not melt and yet excess heat
is produced. That range is between about 400C to 1100C. This is the
subcritical temperature range where energy must
nanoparticale?
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 1:35 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
In the Rossi reactor, there is a range in the operating
temperature were
, 2014 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
If on the other hand, the NAE is just a simple blob of nickel spherical
nanoparticle, then that's different (note that a blob of nickel nanoparticle is
not a nanostructure per se. It does not have a structure such as a nanowire
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:08 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
*If on the other hand, the NAE is just a simple blob of nickel spherical
nanoparticle, then that's
...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:08 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
*If on the other hand, the NAE is just a simple blob of nickel spherical
nanoparticle, then that's different (note that a blob of nickel
nanoparticle
-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Keeping the reactor temperature under control is an engineering issue. It is
the job of the reactors control system to regulate the reactor's temperature.
A failure of that control system
:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 11:08 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
*If on the other hand, the NAE is just a simple blob of nickel
spherical nanoparticle, then that's different (note that a blob
it is not, so I am befuddled why you would
bring this up.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:13 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Keeping the reactor temperature
So, we're getting personal now, eh?
Please divert your efforts into answering my objection.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Quite obviously
, wouldn't you
say?
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6id5Hf-xMWOYXVjekJCN1ZkQk0/edit?pli=1
See a picture of piantelli's nano
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/fundamental-causation-mechanisms-of-lenr.html
It would be very risky saying that AXIL is an open-minded and anti-dogmatic
physicist (he really is!) because - I tell it from experience- all
physicists claim(ed) to be so-
, August 15, 2014 9:58 PM
Subject: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/fundamental-causation-mechanisms-of-lenr.html
It would be very risky saying that AXIL is an open-minded and anti-dogmatic
physicist (he really
Jesus told me it doesn't matter.
2014-08-15 11:52 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
Is Axil a Physicist? I thought he claimed to be a systems engineer.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Jesus told me it doesn't matter.
2014-08-15 11:52 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
Is Axil a Physicist? I thought he
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the
priests. That's the same with Axil.
2014-08-15 12:06 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com:
My friend, why do you have to begin a new round of
Axil is Lixa spelled backwards. That might help...
On Friday, August 15, 2014, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the
priests. That's the same with
Actually, to be serious, his email, janap implies he is probably an x
military systems engineer.
JANAP Joint Army Navy Acquisition Policy
He is was one of the guys with the military microwave pulsed radars
electrocuting and/or dissolving fish, reefs, dolphins, etc...
He should remain anonymous,
AXIL is my friend, I admire him for what he knows; he is able to
write very good analyses and syntheses (this a rare quality)
I alone decide what I publish on my personal blog.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, to be serious, his email,
Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the priests.
That's the same with Axil
- Original Message -
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Actually, to be serious, his email, janap implies he is probably an x
military systems engineer.
JANAP Joint Army Navy
...@zpenergy.com ; VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 9:58 PM
*Subject:* [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Dear Friends
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/08/fundamental-causation-mechanisms-of-lenr.html
It would be very risky saying that AXIL is an open
Mark says he was the carpenter, others the carpenter's son. I don't know
why this should be questioned. It was part of the Gospels writer's narrative
about his outward ordinariness. The Greek word can refer to a contractor, more
than just furniture.
Whatever the faults of Christianity and
I am asking you to give the other cheek and pray for me.
But let's say what the scriptures tells us:
Yachchaapi sarvabhootaanaam beejam tadahamarjuna;
Na tadasti vinaa yatsyaanmayaa bhootam charaacharam
Naanto’sti mama divyaanaam vibhooteenaam parantapa;
Esha tooddeshatah prokto
...@gmail.com
*To:* John Milstone vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 11:09 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the
priests
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
As a fundamentalist, you should be interested in how nuclear decay rates may
vary and what makes them vary. The fundamentalist church as dumped a ton of
money into variable nuclear decay rate
Isaac Newton did not believe in the Trinity. You have to emulate this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they
were offended at him.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Zell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Mark says he was the carpenter, others
:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I am asking you to give the other cheek and pray for me.
But let's say what the scriptures tells us:
Yachchaapi sarvabhootaanaam beejam tadahamarjuna;
Na tadasti vinaa yatsyaanmayaa bhootam charaacharam
Naanto’sti mama
.
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 11:45 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
As a fundamentalist, you should be interested in how nuclear decay rates
may vary and what makes them vary
Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in his
previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna.
It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. Or do
you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching?
2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart
, 2014 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Ed Storms and all the rest do not address what stabilizes the reaction
products of fusion to helium. I am convince that this is at the heart of LENR.
When Ed was evaluating the ash results that LeClair gave him. He saw now
If the world is only 6000 years old, the sum of all Egyptian dynasties go
up to 5000 years. No, there was no biblical flood, at least.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
I really don't see any difference from cold fusion to hot fusion. Just see
my paper with Akito.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
*And didn't LeClair get sick with radiation, hence there may have been some
radioactive nasties, which would put Ed's explanation right on.*
There are two quite different effects here that are independent of each
other. This goes back to the BEC explanation. No BEC means gamma radiation.
No
The difference is the production of neutrons.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I really don't see any difference from cold fusion to hot fusion. Just see
my paper with Akito.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Not all nuclear reactions produce neutrons! Some of them are indeed
harmless, like the decay of Tritium to He3.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Axil,
You present a credible theory that connects the dots nicely with supporting
citations. Your statements may have been a little to mater of fact for some of
your audience who would have you state everything unproven as only your opinion
but your arguments were clear and persuasive..
or we would have LENR occurring everywhere around us where ever we have
large magnetic fields
I think we do have LENR occuring around us. Strong magnetic fields occur
before/during earthquakes, after CMEs/geomagnetic storms, during severe
weather, etc.
We just call it different things because
although I would suggest a little more illumination on the contribution of
the NAE WRT virtual photons / relativistic frames or we would have LENR
occurring everywhere around us where ever we have large magnetic fields.
It takes a very special type of magnetic field. It takes an anapole
magnetic
On 16/08/2014 12:11 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
...It is the inherent unreliability and irreproducibility of the
methods themselves that is causing a lot of controversy.
I don't know why you think radio-nucleotide dating is unreliable (unless
you only listen to the YECs!). Take a look at figure 1
; Roy Virgilio
r.virgi...@gmail.com ; Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com ; Sunwon
Park swp...@kaist.ac.kr ; Tsirlin, Mark tsirl...@missouri.edu ; vlad
v...@zpenergy.com ; VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 9:58 PM
*Subject:* [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Dear
removing some splinters from someone else's eye.
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 11:17 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Actually, to be serious, his email, janap implies
Here's a place to start on radionuclide dating. But my eyes glaze over
(MEGO) relatively quickly
http://answersinscience.org/RadiometricDating-Woolf.htm
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:30 PM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
On 16/08/2014 12:11 AM, Jojo Iznart wrote:
...It is the inherent
- Original Message -
From: Kevin O'Malley
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com wrote:
You have a point there Stewie
Message -
*From:* Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 5:20 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
wrote:
You have a point there Stewie
is highly unreliable. To establish a
theory based on these techniques is building a house of cards
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 3:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
If the world is only 6000 years old, the sum of all Egyptian dynasties go up
to 5000 years. No, there was no biblical flood, at least.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
: Saturday, August 16, 2014 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in his
previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna.
It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. Or do you
think he stared
Would you rather base your world view on one or two outlier points, or on
the overwhelming trend of millions of data points that all fit and are
consistent with each other?
***Excellent point. There are so many who simply do not examine the wide
range of evidence. As a ferinstance, Jojo points
To: John Milstone
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Isaac Newton did not believe in the Trinity. You have to emulate this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi
to support your point of view.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
PS. Exactly which fundamentalist church dumped or is dumping money into
variable nuclear decay
: Kevin O'Malley
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Why would I show you anything if that was your last response or
correspondence with me?
If you aren't going to show YOUR bonafides, why do you ask them of anyone
vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Saturday, August 16, 2014 8:14 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Why would I show you anything if that was your last response or
correspondence with me?
If you aren't going to show YOUR bonafides, why do you ask them of anyone
else? Hypocrisy
vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 11:09 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
I will give you the other cheek and I pray for you, if you are my enemy.
Remember, Jesus told me he is a carpenter but he knew more that the
priests. That's the same with Axil.
2014
I feel like Vortex would not be Vortex without the occasional religious
digression.
Eric
:* Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL
Why would I show you anything if that was your last response or
correspondence with me?
If you aren't going to show YOUR bonafides, why do you ask them of anyone
else? Hypocrisy, thy name is jojo.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jojo Iznart
93 matches
Mail list logo
