RE: [Vo]:Strange Radiation

, December 3, 2018 8:42:30 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Strange Radiation I have recently been looking at "Strange Radiation" and have found a very good review from 10 years ago, whose title indicates that it is about LENR, but in fact it is mainly about strange radiation. It i

Re: [Vo]:Strange Radiation

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru=en=y=_t=en=UTF-8=https%3A%2F%2Fmephi.ru%2Fcontent%2Farticles%2Findex.php%3FELEMENT_ID%3D1689%26SHOWALL_1%3D1= This is a link to a translated Russian paper that shows what is producing the strange radiation. This plasmoid/soliton is what is the cause of

[Vo]:Strange Radiation

I have recently been looking at "Strange Radiation" and have found a very good review from 10 years ago, whose title indicates that it is about LENR, but in fact it is mainly about strange radiation.  It is at http://www.second-physics.ru/reviews/LENR-ru.pdf Like many of the documents/papers,

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

' <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Axil, That was an interesting video. The polar nature of the spots he highlighted on the dental film does justify the live monitoring he is seeking. He does make an interesting comment that these pol

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

ilto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2018 5:57 PM > > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > Francis: I have seen enough published material that supports Hawkings > radiation as a energ

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

uable insight like an insignificant observation. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 4:11 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Th

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

rvation. > > > > Fran > > > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 09, 2018 4:11 PM > > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > *The mecha

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

observation. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 4:11 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR The mechanism that produces the vacuum effects is Bose condensation, The polariton just

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

...@hotmail.com [mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2018 3:01 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > Axil— > > > > Note that the larger more energetic palaritons do not exist on surfac

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

n like" effect on vacuum wavelengths. I would not be surprised if polaritons and Casimir effects are 2 sides of same coin. Fran From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com [mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2018 3:01 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma ra

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

ng else to consider in designing a robust LENR reactor system. Bob Cook From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 10:06:45 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from L

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

s://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5597-atom-ecology/ > > > > *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, May 7, 2018 6:04 PM > > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > >

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

gt; Axil-- > > > > The atomic condensates may all be paired nuclei with 0 net spin like > Cooper pairs of electrons. > > Do you know, if this is the case? > > > > Bob Cook > > > > > > > > *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

Axil-- The atomic condensates may all be paired nuclei with 0 net spin like Cooper pairs of electrons. Do you know, if this is the case? Bob Cook From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 9:43 PM Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR I unde

[Vo]:RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo] Gamma radiation from LENR

just missed it.I hope not. Bob Cook From: Russ<mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:42 AM Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Sorry Bob but you are wrong, see the gammas on demand in cold fusion… https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/559

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

Sorry Bob but you are wrong, see the gammas on demand in cold fusion. https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5597-atom-ecology/ From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 6:04 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiatio

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

u understand the difference that cause some even and some odd number > of petalsa? > > > > Bob Cook > > > -- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, May 7, 2018 12:55:35 PM > > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* R

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

xil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 10:06:45 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Polaritons always form on the surface of metal. When there is enough of them, they naturally begin to come together into a structure t

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

> polariton. This conclusion stems from the strong coupling demonstrated > by polaritons. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > > > *From: *Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Monday, May 7, 2018 12:35 PM > *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com&g

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

-- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, May 7, 2018 10:06:45 AM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > Polaritons always form on the surface of metal. When there is enough of > them, they

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

skimo.com> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR A polariton Bose condensate may contain many billions of polaritons...actually the spins of these polaritons. These petal condensates have been seen in LENR reactors. >From the an impossible invention interview with Fabiani

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

(angular momentum) of the rotating petals is quantified as a J quantum number for the entire BEC. Bob Cook From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 10:06:45 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Pola

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

er in designing a robust LENR reactor > system. > > > > Bob Cook > > > -- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, May 7, 2018 10:06:45 AM > *To:* vortex-l > > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > Polaritons alway

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

/snip] From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>] Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2018 3:22 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR hacking radiation should read Hawking radiation

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

KA the Q factor).[/snip] > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, May 05, 2018 3:22 PM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > hacking radiati

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 4:04:09 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Axil, Your paragraph snipped below makes me question a relationship to Casimir effect, does your scenario

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

cis.x.roa...@lmco.com> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 4:04:09 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR Axil, Your paragraph snipped below makes me question a relationship to Casimir effect, does your scenario exist even when the pumping of the cavity is just virtu

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

: Saturday, May 05, 2018 3:22 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR hacking radiation should read Hawking radiation On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote: The

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

> >> Fran >> >> >> >> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2018 11:42 PM >> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR >> >> >> >>

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

it explains thermalizing > the gamma. > > > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2018 11:42 PM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > &

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

Axil, would your scenario support effects on gas atoms between these surfaces and Casimir/London forces? I like that it explains thermalizing the gamma. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 11:42 PM To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNA

[Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR

Sometimes radiation is produced by the LENR reaction. Why does this occur? It is my belief that the LENR process that thermalizes nuclear level radiation is Bose Einstein Condensation (BEC). If a condition of BEC circumscribes the LENR reaction, the BEC will absorb that nuclear level radiation

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

Correction: Rossi now believes that proton decay powers the Sun should read Holmlid believes that proton decay powers the Sun On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/ >

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169895#pone.0169895.ref007 In his latest article, Holmlid rejects fusion as too weak to power the energy output that he is seeing in his experiments. Holmlid states: "The origin of the particle signals observed here is clearly

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

In fact I have unilaterally removed the offending gamma from the Wikipedia page. I dont expect it to return.  The only gamma rays that it continues correctly to mention are those associated with the annihilation of the positron with an electron. The Mark Davidson paper is very good.  I will

RE: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

Proton-proton fusion is of such low probability that it is almost a waste of time to think that it has relevance in the real world, despite the mainstream view. We see gamma radiation in stars with or without fusion (even Jupiter and the gas giants have lots of gamma emission) but this usually

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:15:30 -0400: Hi, Actually a half life of 14 billion years sounds like it's about the right order of magnitude for the power output of the Sun, given the number of particles that are present. (Note that most of the energy comes from the

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

In reply to Nigel Dyer's message of Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:22:51 +0100: Hi, >In the text of the wikipedia page about proton proton fusion > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction > >It says that in the first stage, when two protons fuse, a gamma ray >proton is produced. 

Re: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

Two particles are created, the positron and the neutrino. Is it possible that the excess energy (0.42MeV) from this first stage goes into into producing movement(aka kinetic energy) in one and/or both of those new particles? By the way, PP fusion inside the core of the Sun has a cross section of

[Vo]:Gamma radiation from proton-proton fusion

In the text of the wikipedia page about proton proton fusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction It says that in the first stage, when two protons fuse, a gamma ray proton is produced.  However this is not shown in the diagram, or in anyone elses diagram, or in

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

<rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:48 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR? I have read Dr. McCulloch's book and find his theory interesting. However, my training in RF gives me a different persp

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

Unified field theory achieved: Unification of gravitation and electromagnetism Dr C Y Lo July 2016 | | | | || | | | || Unified field theory achieved: Unification of gravitation and electromagnet... On the test of Newton's inverse square law and the

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

very bad idiots. one math error "they" make is highlighted  at following link with lecturer still teaching it in lecture to students- Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton | | | | || | | | || Maths contradiction in Einstein's

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

Do you honestly believe that modern relativity theory takes Einstein's conclusions from his original papers and just blindly uses them? What kind of idiots do you take physicists to be, anyway? The modern version of SR is based on tensor calculus with little or no connection with Einstein's

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

>>You can't just apply SR in the curved spacetime around a gravitating mass and >>get the right answer. ah relativity "they" have done the math wrong see: Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton | | | | || | | | || Maths

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

One trivial point -- if you're in free fall I don't think there is any Rindler boundary. You're following a geodesic, and not "really" accelerating. You can't just apply SR in the curved spacetime around a gravitating mass and get the right answer. In fact, while you certainly /can/ apply

Re: [Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

I have read Dr. McCulloch's book and find his theory interesting. However, my training in RF gives me a different perspective on wave phenomena that doesn't seem to match up with his theory. In his theory, he drops out wavelengths of EM background radiation that would be filtered in the

[Vo]:Unruh radiation, plasmons, and possible implications for LENR?

http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.com/2016/09/unruh-radiation-confirmed.html

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

Bob Greenyer explains in this video that the lack of radiation in the Lugano test is probably due ~1mm or so tungsten envelope between the reactor core and the alumina tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMs2We34jXo=youtu.be He also describes some neat ideas for a ECat type reactor which could

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

One of the amazing properties of the monopole field is that it makes the matter that it encompasses impervious to destruction. Hydrogen Rydberg Matter covered in a monopole EMF field would be impervious to a nuclear bomb blast. This can be understood in the experiments of LeClair, where he

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

From: Eric Walker * To play devil's advocate, the hypothetical neutron flux could have produced short-lived beta radioisotopes when they activated something in or near the experiment. Eric, Even without activation - the neutron itself is a beta emitter. Free neutrons have a half-life

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

There are non nuclear mechanisms how may generate x-gamma radiation. Tape can produce it. http://www.nature.com/news/2008/012345/full/news.2008.1185.html Maybe same mechanism is in work during crack formation. The energy may be enough to produce gamma rays if its enough to produce

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: Jones, the moral of the story is that the large amount of lead (and it > probably took a whole lot for the HPGe detector) converted some of the > cosmic rays into a small *neutron* flux. MFMP did not measure neutrons.

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

There is some sort of radiation coming out of Rossi's Mouse reactor that stimulates the unpowered Cat reactors. Maybe pions and muons... how can we tell now that MDMP has a reactor that maybe is functional at a Mouse level COP of 1.2 On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Jones Beene

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

Bob, Isn’t the reality check that eliminating a cosmic ray contribution means the expected gamma counts are going to be too low to impress anyone? However, I am very glad you are going to the trouble – if you also test for radiation (all types) with and without the enclosure, and then

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

some strange emissions lurking in cold fusion/lenr that are not yet well understood, perhaps never having been described! From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 7:27 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation Do you

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

Do you have a reference on this? Otherwise, a lead cave would not be useful - it is there to protect the sensor from the cosmic rays. My understanding is that the cosmic rays produce the neutrons by spallation. If the neutrons are absorbed in the lead, they will likely cause isotopic shift

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

If the spectrum from the MFMP experiment really does come from the reactor, and if MFMP reactor could run for 32 days without lead shielding would one have to sit right next to it for the entire time for it to be harmful? Harry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Bob Higgins

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

From: Bob Higgins * Jones, the moral of the story is that the large amount of lead (and it probably took a whole lot for the HPGe detector) converted some of the cosmic rays into a small neutron flux. Bob, as the thesis clearly states – the neutrons then are absorbed by the lead,

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

gt; experiments and had not seen any up to that time. > > Moral of the story is radiation measurements are so wonderfully sensitive > one can be fooled by what appears to be large signals but which are really > such tiny signals many simple explanations can explain them away. > > --

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

oled by what appears to be large signals but which are really such tiny signals many simple explanations can explain them away. -Original Message- From: H LV Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation Jones Beene wrote: From: H LV >> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to chec

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

-Original Message- From: H LV > If it is do due cosmic rays then it is quite a coincident that it happens > just when the reactor enters phase 7. No coincidence at all. Please notice that section 7 is NOT the zone of greatest gain. Just the opposite - it is the zone of greatest

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

l.com] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 5:29 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: H LV > >> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to c

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > -Original Message- > From: H LV > >> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray emissions at >> more than 50 cm from the reactor... over the 32 day duration test it looks >> like the

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

28, 2016 4:41 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: H LV > > > >> In the Lugano test dosimeter

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Russ George wrote: > The photo of the detector placement has helped to understand this mystery > > As far as 'breaking radiation' aka Bremstrahlung, any form of energetic > particle coming to a halt produces that characteristic signal,

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

of joules of cold fusion nuclear activity are seen in similar x-rays the dose would be multiplied by a very large number. -Original Message- From: H LV [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 4:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > -Original Message- > From: H LV > >> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray emissions at >> more than 50 cm from the reactor... over the 32 day duration test it looks >> like the

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

be reproduced at will. -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 3:44 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation -Original Message- From: H LV > In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for ga

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

' event observed is likely to have been less than a billionth of a watt of 'cold fusion' equivalence. -Original Message- From: H LV [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 3:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation In the Lugano test

RE: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

-Original Message- From: H LV > In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray emissions at > more than 50 cm from the reactor... over the 32 day duration test it looks > like the dosimeters didn't record anything above background... If the MFMP > reactor resembles

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

The sensors were placed relatively far away, and the total "dose" was low. For the electronic rate meters, they did not report what they detected, simply that it was below the alarm level that they had set (set where?). There was no spectrometry. On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:12 PM, H LV

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray emissions at more than 50 cm from the reactor. (see Appendix 1) http://amsacta.unibo.it/4084/1/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf I don't understand all the jargon but over the 32 day duration test it looks like the dosimeters didn't record

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

ted to a temperature that is lower than its melting point. Dave -Original Message- From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Feb 28, 2016 3:16 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation OR, the materials in the stack of his fla

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

OR, the materials in the stack of his flat plate reactor include a thermal resistance material. It doesn't have to be an air gap to provide the thermal resistance that would allow the fuel to be at a different temperature than the molten lead. On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:09 PM, David Roberson

Re: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

-Original Message- From: H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Feb 27, 2016 7:50 pm Subject: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation Mathieu Valat of MFMP made this comment on the youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtTeHU4vBmc Mathieu Valat14 hours

[Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation

Mathieu Valat of MFMP made this comment on the youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtTeHU4vBmc Mathieu Valat14 hours ago Bob gave a lot of himself in the last week. Big cheers up for this video! For the record, my friends are retired nuclear scientists. What they hypothesised is

[Vo]:no radiation

Jones writes This conclusion is not logical either, Robin. Since there is also no known nuclear reaction involving hydrogen which can provide the amount of energy claimed by Levi, especially not without radiation - we must look elsewhere than nuclear. Maybe its telleportation, maybe its

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

I wrote: What is interesting for this particular model (photon transmission through 1cm of nickel) is that reaction channels (0)-(3), which are the deuteron capture reactions, are either not detected or barely detected (keep in mind there was a layer of lead shielding the E-Cat at one point).

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

Why are the ash products all different between systems? What could explain these differences? DGT has no copper but lots of boron, beryllium, and lithium. Rossi has iron and copper, Piantelli has a mix. Mizuno has helium and copper. It is safe to say that no two LENR systems have the same ash

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

that happen depend upon their final lower energy states in any given coherent LENReaction. That is IMHO. Bob - Original Message - From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 1:24 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

In the past, following the many statements compiled by Gary Wright of Rossi saying that they were seeing significant amounts of copper, I have argued in favor of a proton capture reaction in the NiH system. I argued this not out of a strong conviction that this was the case, but out of a desire

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

I've had a chance to revisit the earlier model of photon transmission from the E-Cat through various media and incorporate some new features. Now decay half-lives and detector efficiency are factored in. Here is what I'm seeing for 1cm of nickel: Photons from a total of 7e+14 transitions per

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

spin states to handle the excess mass energy released in the reactions. All this is without gammas. How's that for a guess? Bob Cook - Original Message - From: Eric Walker To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2014 8:01 PM Subject: [Vo]:transmitted

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

Hi Eric, Nice spreadsheet. I like how it captures a lot of considerations in one place. Have you considered adding the reactions that would include a delta in atomic number of 2N? Seems like there were trends in experiment reports showing transmutations by integer multiples of 2 in atomic

Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

Hi Bob, Good comments. Replies inline. Just to mention it again, the model is no more than a back-of-the-envelope estimate. I'm guessing a rigorous treatment would do a lot of things differently. Eric On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: The first

[Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system

I was curious what the numbers would look like for a range of possible reactions in an NiH system if the only two assumptions that were made were that nuclear reactions are the main show in NiH LENR and that somehow there is a way to overcome Coulomb repulsion. Although I suspect this is not the

[Vo]:FYI: Radiation from an accelerating neutral body: The case of rotation

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/i2013-13134-9 Abstract: When an object is bound at rest to an attractional field, its rest mass (owing to the law of energy conservation, including the mass and energy equivalence of the Special Theory of Relativity) must decrease. The mass

Re: [Vo]:FYI: Radiation from an accelerating neutral body: The case of rotation

determines the 3D spatial orientation of the emitted photons in this case? Dave -Original Message- From: Mark Jurich jur...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Vortex-L@Eskimo.Com Sent: Fri, Nov 15, 2013 12:17 am Subject: [Vo]:FYI: Radiation from an accelerating neutral body: The case

[Vo]:Bharat radiation

This is information about Bharat radiation was posted by Dr. M.A. Padmanabha Rao on another list. Bharat radiation is suppose to be radiation from radioisotopes which appear to emit UV rays instead of Gamma rays. Harry -- You may be interested in the following papers:

[Vo]:microelectronic radiation dosimeter

For those of you wanting to build your own radiation detector. http://www.teledynemicro.com/space/space_micro_dosimeter.asp With a footprint of 1.4 x 1.0 x 0.040 and a total weight of 20 grams, Teledyne Microelectronics' new Class K Space qualified radiation Micro Dosimeter is the

[Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

In following up on a story in the Sci-News today, mention was made of the so-called Radiation Paradox. In fact there are two versions. If there is longer-term hope for the residents around Fukushima, healthwise, this could be relevant. A region around Ramsar, Iran on the Caspian has the highest

Re: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

Many people in Japan think that low level exposure to radioactivity in hot springs is good for you. That includes many scientists. Hideo Ikegami thought so. There may be something to it. We are evolved to survive low, natural levels, so I doubt they cause much harm. Jones Beene

Re: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

What is well know science today is thate unlike the radioprotection assumption, effect of dose is not at all linear without treshold. in fact any agression, like oxygen, chemican aggressors, heat, sun, radiation, might cause DNA error. if the dose is very low, the cell detect the error and launch

Re: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

By the way, Ikegami also said that tests with tritium failed to show biological damage. They exposed various species to much higher concentrations than the safety rules allow for people, but the plants and fish seemed fine. Mike Melich says the radiation standards were more or less pulled out of

Re: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: if the dose is very low, the cell detect the error and launch apoptosis (clean suicide). if dose get higher (the cell know that because of neighbor messaging) the cell use heat shock protein system to repair nicely all the errors. if errors get

FW: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

Subject: Re: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox To: vortex-l@eskimo.com What is well know science today is thate unlike the radioprotection assumption, effect of dose is not at all linear without treshold. in fact any agression, like oxygen, chemican aggressors, heat, sun, radiation, might cause DNA

Re: [Vo]:the Radiation Paradox

another detail I've heard recently is the importance of the dose flow, and not only the dose. fast dose flow will cause much more dammage, than regular flow of the same dose. this have been recently studied and published. it is not new data, but simply catching more attention than before.

[Vo]:Neutron Radiation

I have been attempting to improve my understanding of nuclear reactions and have reached some interesting conclusions. It has been known for many decades that the motion of a charged particle such as an electron or proton results in the emission of electromagnetic radiation. The smooth non

[Vo]:Demron Radiation Suit

This company has donated 200 suits to Japan: http://www.radshield.com/ and has ramped up production. They cost less than a nice Armani. T

  1   2   >