Re: [Vo]:Monday Update to Release Information on Self Sustain Mode

Dear Jones, While trying to do some catching up in my huge Vortex backlog, I noticed you were kind enough to mention my sphincter effect. Thanks for making it remain forever in the annals. Michel 2011/1/23 Jones Beene : ... > Well, it’s almost humorous - but one of the ways to accelerate protons

Re: [Vo]:Semi-off-topic: Economic cognitive dissonance

Hoyt, I see no explanation for cars costing less than freight, but regarding the multifunction printer, what they make money on is replacement ink cartridges. Razor and blade business model. Michel 2010/10/3, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. : > > Summary: I should be able to buy a reasonably luxurious au

Re: [Vo]:Interactions of charged particles on surfaces

Dear all, In my understanding, even though I haven't seen it expressed this way elsewhere, dielectric breakdown is what happens to the so-called Helmholtz double layer capacitor's insulator (the water monolayer separating the cathode's surface electron layer from the first layer of electrolyte dis

Re: [Vo]:electron slit diffraction

Youtube - Single electron double slit wave experiment (1mn video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ-0PBRuthc http://www.hitachi.com/rd/research/em/doubleslit.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#When_observed_emission_by_emission http://l-esperimento-piu-bello-della-fisica.bo

Re: [Vo]:The Secret of Cold Fusion

2010/5/16 Jones Beene > > Curiously, they call this phone Nexus and despite Nexis having been around a > lot longer – google got their version into my spell-checker somehow. Either that, or your spell-checker knows more words than you do ;-) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nexus Mai

[Vo]:Electrochemical compression and craters (was Re: Shanahan...)

2010/5/10 Jones Beene : > Michel, > > Can you cite the reference for this kind of bursting tube, due to internal > pressurization, having being actually performed? Some electrolytic compressor literature: 1/ Arata - "Method of producing ultrahigh pressure gas" (US pat. 5647970, 1

Re: [Vo]:Shanahan is proposing the cigarette lighter hypothesis

No Abd, Shanahan may be wrong on many points but the "equivalent to many atmospheres of hydrogen gas pressure exposure" assertion is correct, it is even a gross understatement, in the P&F original paper they computed something like 10^26 atm IIRC. That's electrolytic compression: if you use a hollo

Re: [Vo]:Shanahan paper and Krivit's response

2010/5/7 Jed Rothwell : > I wrote: > >>> Wait a minute.  Why should I care about two people, who are both >>> wrong . . . >> >> Who said I care? . . . > > Seriously, let us grant that Krivit is right in this instance. Shanahan is > smart but he went off the rails a long time ago, with an idée fixe

Re: [Vo]:Berkeley Scientists discover inexpensive metal catalyst for generating hydrogen from water news

If I understand correctly, the role of such a catalyst is to reduce activation energy, thus bringing the reaction's energy consumption closer to its theoretical minimum, see e.g. : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocatalyst << An electrocatalyst is a catalyst that participates in electrochemica

Re: [Vo]:McKubre paper re-OCRed with ClearScan

9.0 2010/5/5 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> To change D20 in D2O use the standard method to >> edit ClearScan text, I just tried it and it worked for me: using the >> touchup text tool select the "0" in D20, right click, select >> properties,

Re: [Vo]:McKubre paper re-OCRed with ClearScan

Hi Jed, It looks great indeed! To change D20 in D2O use the standard method to edit ClearScan text, I just tried it and it worked for me: using the touchup text tool select the "0" in D20, right click, select properties, change the special font to a system font e.g. Arial bold, close the dialog bo

Re: [Vo]:"Clearscan" in Adobe Acrobat 9

before re_OCRing, I believe that's possible in Acrobat) maybe it's safer to stick to the less glamorous but more faithful "searchable image" format for now. Michel 2010/4/11 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> Jed, it seems the way it performs depends on

Re: [Vo]:"Clearscan" in Adobe Acrobat 9

Jed, it seems the way it performs depends on the original document's characteristics (resolution, fonts, multiplicity of fonts maybe?). In the case of the Feynman Lectures on Physics, volume 3 (quantum mechanics), of which I made a searchable backup of my print version from an image format pdf foun

Re: [Vo]:why is this object glowing?

2010/4/9 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : ... > I.e., radioactive decay. Come to think of that, isn't > this LENR? After all, nuclear, and takes place at low temperatures Good point. > (I've never seen anyone use LENR to refer to radioactive decay, mostly > because something that happens with a single nucle

Inexpensive convincing Cold Fusion generated helium (was Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments...)

input energy measurement on the same number of cells. And, even more importantly, it could be easily analyzed or even run in a skeptic's lab. Michel 2010/4/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : > At 05:02 AM 4/2/2010, Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> Re Stephen's argument that it can be argued t

Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying trick

2010/4/1 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: ... >> What we need is an indisputable proof of He production. All right it leaks >> through glass, so how about a closed cell kept under positive pressure? >> Surely, after a few days it would accumulate a sizable amount of

Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying trick

2010/3/31 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : > Sent from my iPhone Not a valid excuse ;-) > On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> In fact, I was wondering, who cares about the heat, helium production >> alone is an indisputable proof of LENRs, isn't it? > >

Re: [Vo]:Krivit comments on his annoying trick

Friends, I object to the heavy Krivit bashing, it is not called for, even if the evidence for the 24MeV heat/He was solid enough which I don't think it is. And he is free to present his graphs as he pleases in his slides, especially if he directs the reader to a more complete graph elsewhere. In

Re: [Vo]:Stimulus Suspension Would Put 85,000 Wind Jobs at Risk

2010/3/27 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : > At 07:39 AM 3/26/2010, Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say "my cell makes excess >> heat" but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter. > > I intend to fix that, you k

Re: [Vo]:Mizuno couldn't get to ACS

2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell : > Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > >> Are there any published works showing nuclear phenomena such as excess >> heat, correlated with deuterium percentage? I'm starting with 99.9% D2O >>  (atom percent D). What would be the difference I should expect with 98% >> D2O, which is s

Re: [Vo]:Stimulus Suspension Would Put 85,000 Wind Jobs at Risk

d Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> Duncan didn't bring in his own measurement system so he didn't see the >> excess heat for himself. > > Oh give me a break. > > That's ridiculous. The technique was replicated as SRI and ENEA. CBS sent > one of the

Re: [Vo]:Stimulus Suspension Would Put 85,000 Wind Jobs at Risk

2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> > So, you would not believe the Wright brothers unless they let you fly >> > their >> > airplane? >> >> A better analogy is that I would not believe them unless I saw them >> flying it with my

Re: [Vo]:Triumph looks in the mirror

 to my grandson??? > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Michel Jullian > wrote: >> >> Hi, Peter-in-the-grave :) Since CF is a surface effect, how about >> plating just a few microns of Pd onto some cheaper metal? >> >> 2010/3/26 Peter Gluck : >> > Ni

Re: [Vo]:Stimulus Suspension Would Put 85,000 Wind Jobs at Risk

2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say "my cell makes excess >> heat" but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter. > > So, you would not believe the Wright brothers unless they

Re: [Vo]:Triumph looks in the mirror

Hi, Peter-in-the-grave :) Since CF is a surface effect, how about plating just a few microns of Pd onto some cheaper metal? 2010/3/26 Peter Gluck : > Nice to hear from you, Terry. The trouble is that 0.1 mm is too thin, Pd > overheats, melts- losses, problems etc. Can you calculate the surface > t

Re: [Vo]:Stimulus Suspension Would Put 85,000 Wind Jobs at Risk

No wonder, the cold fusion experimenters say "my cell makes excess heat" but they won't let skeptics see it with their own calorimeter. Michel 2010/3/25 Jed Rothwell : > I should have added -- > > Nothing like what I have described has happened so far because no one in the > energy business reali

Re: [Vo]:Krivit again uses annoying trick

I'll remind, just in case it isn't clear for everybody, that for every two Ds which will have disappeared and every He which will have appeared, 24 MeV of energy will have been released in any case, _whatever the intermediary or concurrent reactions if any_. The energy released by a nuclear reacti

Re: [Vo]:Krivit again uses annoying trick

Fits with your 159 IQ. Back on topic, I understand why you are mad at Steve krivit for pushing his POV that the heat/helium = 24 MeV/He is bogus, that's because that correlation is what made you believe CF might well be real. You don't want to doubt again. Michel 2010/3/24 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

. Unfortunately the cells know this too > Peter" > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> >> Michel Jullian wrote: >> >>> It is less independent than using a fresh cathode and >>> > your own cell. >>> >>> W

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

2010/3/23 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> If I was the inventor, I would take my cold fusion cell, *as a black >> box to preserve my secrets*, to whatever authority accepts to test it > > I do not think there is any chance that would work. I have never seen a

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

st methods to > stop heat release, increase of the active life of a generator and many other > things from the realm of engineering. > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Michel Jullian > wrote: >> >> 2010/3/23 Peter Gluck : >> > Dear Michel, >> > Yes

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

2010/3/23 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> You missed my point about Scott/Earthtech, which is not that they have a >> more sensitive calorimeter (which for kW level power is irrelevant I agree), >> but that they can perform an _independent_ measurement

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

hings. > By the way, the saying is not dirty, it says persuasively that the > professional principles and rules have to be respected strictly. Dura lex, > sed lex in technology too Oh, I get it now! Quite true! Michel > Peter. > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Michel Jullian >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

2010/3/23 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> > You need not worry about that sort of thing. >> > I have been in contact with >> > both parties, >> > and they have already taken apart the cells. >> >> Which parties? > > Please

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

asurement just can make the situation worse. An indecent Hungarian proverb > say "you cannot XXX out with technology!" that means you need the know how > elements, you have to respect the rules.. Is there a French ~equivalent for > that? > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Mi

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

2010/3/21 Peter Gluck : > Merci beaucoup, Michel... > My interest is in technology and this resurrection or rejuvenation of the > Piantelli system > is the first really interesting event after many years. It is a great > mystery what has happened between 1994 and 2008, it is crucial to know when >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > >> >> Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as even if the experimental setup is >> made fully open to the experts and they find nothing wrong with it (heating >> resistor current as advertised etc), there is no w

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

p coil, some related circuitry, and >> the > aforementioned capacitors. > > If I'm wrong, then I'm confused (no >> great surprise there). > > > > On 03/21/2010 11:56 AM, Michel Jullian >> wrote: >> Wait a minute, I see no cap attached to the output on H

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

to these claims- if I remember > correctly. > Is some other breakthrough of this type hidden somewhere? > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Michel Jullian > wrote: >> >> 2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell : >> > Someone asked me what I mean by "independent evaluati

Re: [Vo]:Rossi

2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell : > Someone asked me what I mean by "independent evaluations of the claims." I > mean that outside experts plan to go into the lab and observe the > experiments, the way Rob Duncan looked at Energetics Technologies. Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as even if the experim

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

agram. Is the diagram not complete? 2010/3/21 Stephen A. Lawrence : > > > On 03/21/2010 09:55 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: >> Which voltage? > > Volts on the caps attached to the output -- right, Harry? > > But the signal generator is still hooked up, and it's coupled t

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

Which voltage? 2010/3/20, Harry Veeder : > yes. > You are aware that the the voltage keeps rises even after the battery is > disconnected. > > harry > > > > > - Original Message >> From: Michel Jullian >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Sen

Re: [Vo]:New book with a chapter on cold fusion

2010/3/20 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : > At 02:00 PM 3/19/2010, Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> What a jerk. On that page alone, he says one loads palladium into >> deuterium, and platinum too, and he professes that excess heat is the >> "bad kind" of cold fusion! > &g

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

t I suppose that doesn't matter either? > > > harry > > > > > ----- Original Message >> From: Michel Jullian >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 1:42:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram >> >> The capaci

Re: [Vo]:New book with a chapter on cold fusion

What a jerk. On that page alone, he says one loads palladium into deuterium, and platinum too, and he professes that excess heat is the "bad kind" of cold fusion! 2010/3/19 Jed Rothwell : > D. Goodstein, "On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales from the Front Lines of > Science" > > http://www.amazon.

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

or without a load. > compare photo 2: > http://tinyurl.com/ycw4xm4 > > with operating principles > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost_converter > > Harry > > > > > > - Original Message >> From: Michel Jullian >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >

Re: [Vo]:Neat new OCR technology

2010/3/19 Michel Jullian : ... if you convert a > clearscan pdf back to image format in higher resolution e.g. 600 dpi > (this can be set in edit>preferences>convert from pdf>TIFF>edit > settings), make a new pdf from that, and re-do an OCR on it, > interestingly the

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

coil core. ;]" > > Harry > > > > - Original Message >> From: Harry Veeder >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010 10:46:19 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram >> >> Ok, I gave him the wiki reference. >

Re: [Vo]:Neat new OCR technology

One can download Acrobat 9 from their web site and try it for a month for free. Disappointingly, the accuracy of the recognition itself is not better with this clearscan option, it's just the look. However, thanks to the zoomable (vector) nature of the clearscan characters, if you convert a clears

Re: [Vo]:circuit diagram

Nothing mysterious about this circuit, it's a silly boost converter without a load. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boost_converter 2010/3/18 Harry Veeder : > > > > > - Original Message >> From: Jed Rothwell >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Sent: Thu, March 18, 2010

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi patent

Are you sure of the gender? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea "In Italy and Albania, Andrea is a masculine name, the equivalent of Andrew." Michel 2010/3/16 Jed Rothwell : ... > As I mentioned, Rossi told me they are working hard on new publications and > they plan to divulge more information

[Vo]:Neat new OCR technology

Jed, have you tried the "clearscan" setting in Adobe Acrobat 9 OCR? Very impressive. They explain their clever (and "obvious", in retrospect) trick in this demo video: http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p28891758/ Michel

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

If they have equal shares in this work, why isn't Focardi on the patent? Michel 2010/3/15, Jed Rothwell : > Michel Jullian wrote: > > >> Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? > > > No. The authors are aware of this paper. It is really

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010/3/14 Steven Krivit : > At 02:35 AM 3/14/2010, you wrote: > > Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work? > > I don't think he would want to. Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? Or one would have to imagine that Focardi himself has been conned. Note t

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work? 2010/3/14, Steven Krivit : > Ladies and gentlemen, > > The truth is, I plead, to a large degree, ignorance of this Focardi&Rossi > matter. > > It had been originally brought to my attention as a patent, and then I > pointed out to the pers

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

Rouge, red, rosso/rossi, thought it was a multilingual pun ;) 2010/3/13, Jed Rothwell : > I wrote -- and I mean typed, not dictated: > > >> These rouge researchers don't make it any easier to trust them, do they? >> > > Also the rogue ones. > > A rouge researcher would be one who wears lipstick I

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

Hi Jones, Thanks for the interesting story. According to Google the document you quoted from is this DOD report: http://dodfuelcell.cecer.army.mil/library_items/Thermo(2004).pdf The link doesn't seem to be working right now, but the text remains available via Google's cache: http://209.85.229.1

Re: [Vo]:Test

2010/3/10, Jed Rothwell : > Alexander Hollins, who also uses Gmail, wrote: > >>No, I did not see that particular email. [the Teller paper in HTML format] I saw it, even though I use gmail too. I wonder if this because I have your email address in my gmail contacts. Do you? Does Alexander? > Ha! I

Re: [Vo]:Will upload ICCF-3 and ICCF-5

Hi Jed, many thanks for this, but aren't there many other ICCF proceedings missing? According to your "special collections" page at http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/Introduction.htm you only have ICCF-10, ICCF-11 and ICCF-12 complete, and selected papers of ICCF-9 Michel 2010/2/27 Jed Rothwe

Re: [Vo]:Extraordinary Error -- no electric field exists inside a conducting liquid in an insulated box with two external charged metal plates, re work by SPAWAR on cold fusion since 2002 -- also ho

Hi Horace, Another typo: Frick instead of Fick. All these macroscopic phenomena you discuss regarding the motion of ions in an electrolyte boil down, at the atomic scale, to the electric force, don't you agree? In any case, in a dense conductor, whether liquid or solid or even a dense gas such a

Re: [Vo]:Extraordinary Error -- no electric field exists inside a conducting liquid in an insulated box with two external charged metal plates, re work by SPAWAR on cold fusion since 2002 -- also ho

2010/2/23, Horace Heffner : ... >Therefore ion motion in the electrolyte proper is mostly > due to random walk and concentration gradients. ... The ion motion is due to a force, what kind of force do you think, the "concentration gradient force"? It's of course an electric force, entirely due to an

Re: [Vo]:Extraordinary Error -- no electric field exists inside a conducting liquid in an insulated box with two external charged metal plates, re work by SPAWAR on cold fusion since 2002 -- also ho

But Rich, like others who mentioned this before (as I recall Mike Carrell did), is right that the component of the internal field due to the *externally* applied DC Electric field in some SPAWAR experiments, through insulating walls, should rapidly reach zero in the electrolyte and stay there. I s

Re: [Vo]:"Pycnodeuterium" response from Muhlenberg HSG FORUM

The authors might be well placed to answer that, you'll find their email addresses on the paper: http://eprints.iisc.ernet.in/12432/1/Lochon_Catalyzed_D-D_Fusion.pdf 2010/2/17 Jones Beene > > Enquiring minds want to know: > > 1) How does a Lochon differ from a Cooper pair ? > 2) Is the formation

Re: [Vo]:IBM Trumps Nanosolar

2010/2/16 Terry Blanton : > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > > >> Only at the sample stage, and "printed" in pure nitrogen rather than >> air, but nice! > > Air is already 70% nitrogen.  All we need do is remove the impurities.  :-)

Re: [Vo]:IBM Trumps Nanosolar

2010/2/14 Terry Blanton : > With a printable cell which does not use tellurium nor indium: > > http://www.physorg.com/news185093054.html Only at the sample stage, and "printed" in pure nitrogen rather than air, but nice! They had the good idea to make the technical paper freely accessible: http:/

Re: [Vo]:New Energy Times continues the drama. Comment.

Nice post Abd. Just a terminology detail, I don't think "Q factor" is adequate for the heat released by a reaction. "Q factor" is a dimensionless factor used in resonance phenomena. I think you really mean "Q value". Michel 2010/2/11 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : > In a mail sent out, apparently, to NET

Re: [Vo]:comment on Violante data as covered by Steve Krivit

Hi Horace, sorry for the late response, my comments below. 2010/2/7 Horace Heffner : > > On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> 2010/2/7 Horace Heffner : >>> >>> Two things to consider: (1) reversing the current *does* "dissolve" the &g

Re: [Vo]:comment on Violante data as covered by Steve Krivit

ollide hard. Also, if Bose Einstein Condensates are involved, they requires cold bosons for their formation. Head-on collisions may be a plausible mechanism for deuteron kinetic energy removal. Michel > On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> 2010/2/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax :

Re: [Vo]:comment on Violante data as covered by Steve Krivit

2010/2/2 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax : ... > A single > SRI experiment has been published that made strong efforts to recover all > the helium, and it came up with, as I recall, about 25 MeV. That experiment was discussed in the paper submitted by Hagelstein, McKubre et al to the DOE in 2004: http://www.

Re: [Vo]:Doing the Bosenova

Rb 85 atom is 37 protons, 48 neutrons and 37 electrons (all fermions, with spins 1/2 or -1/2), that's an even number of fermions (122) so it's a boson atom (integer spin), even though it's nucleus is a fermion. However I believe I read (can't remember where) that in BECs of atoms, the bosons are o

Re: [Vo]:Spam has been eliminated? Robin posts considered spam (was Re: OFF TOPIC "Davos predictions: predictably wrong?")

Robin, have you watched the Youtube video Terry linked to? Here is the link again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE It's the 1970 Monty Python sketch, "Spam", which is the actual origin of the use of the word for unsolicited email, due to the high number of times the word is repeated in

[Vo]:Spam has been eliminated? Robin posts considered spam (was Re: OFF TOPIC "Davos predictions: predictably wrong?")

2010/1/25 Jed Rothwell : > By the way, I think Bill Gates (2004) was right and spam has been largely > eliminated. Jed, I see you use Gmail, have you checked the number of emails in your spam folder? (the spams you have received in the last month if you haven't deleted them manually). Mine contain

Re: [Vo]:OT: Space travel, moon colonization.

The elevator cable doesn't have to be electrically conductive. Michel 2010/1/25 Alexander Hollins : > best link ive found so far. > > http://www.data4science.net/essays.php?EssayID=850 > hmm, i think its the same one you are talking about.  I THOUGHT there > was another one done, but i could be w

Re: [Vo]:orbo is a heat pump?

2010/1/25 Harry Veeder : > If orbo were extracting heat from the air then part of the orbo would become > hotter than the surrounding air, but for that to happen wouldn't part of the > orbo have to be cooler than the surrounding air? I guess so, isn't it the case? Michel

Re: [Vo]:orbo is a heat pump?

Didn't even know this existed, thanks Jones for making me look more learned than I am! No, I was just saying that IF it is a heat pump, THEN of course the surrounding air should get cooler, I had no mechanism in mind, I don't even know what the Orbo is made of. Your magnetocaloric effect could be

Re: [Vo]:orbo is a heat pump?

I suggested it could be a heat pump about a week ago, after someone (you, I think) said that the orbo generated more heat than its electrical energy consumption. If it's a high COP (>2) heat pump it can be quite useful for heating purposes, although totally useless for electrical power generation a

Re: [Vo]:steorn addendum video posted on youtube

2010/1/21 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson : > From Michel: > >>> My point was that Mr. & Mrs. Jane & Joe Public are not the >>> "entities" Steorn is going after. Steorn is mostly going >>> after companies, enterprises, corporate entities (big >>> or small) that might be interested. > >> I think on th

Re: [Vo]:steorn addendum video posted on youtube

2010/1/21 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson : > My point was that > Mr. & Mrs. Jane & Joe Public are not the "entities" Steorn is going after. > Steorn is mostly going after companies, enterprises, corporate entities (big > or small) that might be interested. I think on the contrary that the ent

Re: [Vo]:Back EMF: Sean may be right

2010/1/16, Mark Iverson : > I sent one post which hasn't shown up yet... Perhaps its awaiting Bills > scrutiny before allowing it > thru. It had a JPEG attachment This is because posts above 40 KB total size are not allowed on this Eskimo hosted list, which is one of several reasons why Bill cons

Re: [Vo]:Capacitors for Steorn

Yes, good point William, that's the way to make a capacitor both large and fast. However, if their claim is that they produce more heat than they consume electrical power as Harry said (some form of heat pump maybe?), then the capacitor voltage could drop even if their claim was valid couldn't it?

Re: [Vo]:Significant Implications - Kitamura

Hi Jones, Sorry for the delay, here is the ref (note it refers to hydrogen, not deuterium, whose heat of adsorption could thus conceivably be the 2 eV per D found by Kitamura for 5 nm particle sizes): "JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS 104, 1-16 (1987) Calorimetric Heat of Adsorption Measurements on Palladium

Re: [Vo]:Significant Implications - Kitamura

2009/12/29 Jones Beene : > OK, vorticians. This is could be an important paper and topic, so let me add > one more point of clarification to Michel Jullian's point about the "heat of > combustion" of hydrogen, compared to the anomalous "loading heat" of > Kitamura's claim. > > Michel correctly find

Re: [Vo]:Horrace help

2009/12/30 : > I liked what you did.  It gave a first approximation very good answer. > > Now the next thing I have been trying to get a grip on is, > > "What is the phonon frequency of the dissolved hydrogen in a cold fusion > palladium electrode?" Haven't followed his calculation closely but I

Re: [Vo]:Significant Implications - Kitamura

2009/12/29 Stephen A. Lawrence : > > > On 12/29/2009 11:19 AM, Jones Beene wrote: >> Since water can be split into H2 and O2 with 1.23 volts - does it stand to >> reason that one could get 1.5 eV in return ? That was rhetorical; and of >> course this one of nature's built-in cases of "systemic over

Re: [Vo]:Significant Implications - Kitamura

2009/12/29 Jones Beene : > -Original Message- > From: Michel Jullian > >> - but the 2 eV available >> from loading alone without deuterium (contrast that to about .5 eV if the >> hydrogen were burned in air) is a huge surprise - > > MJ: Jones, where did

Re: [Vo]:Significant Implications - Kitamura

2009/12/28 Jones Beene : > - but the 2 eV available > from loading alone without deuterium (contrast that to about .5 eV if the > hydrogen were burned in air) is a huge surprise - Jones, where did you get that .5 eV figure? I did the maths and found about 1.5 eV instead, here is the Google calcu

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Nick Palmer uploads video on Climategate

phen A. Lawrence : > > > On 12/09/2009 05:51 PM, Michel Jullian wrote: >> >> You're right Rick that suppression can occur even in the US: >> >> http://premiereslignes.blogs.nouvelobs.com/archive/2009/12/08/enfumes.html >> >> (in French, sorry) > >

Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC Nick Palmer uploads video on Climategate

You're right Rick that suppression can occur even in the US: http://premiereslignes.blogs.nouvelobs.com/archive/2009/12/08/enfumes.html (in French, sorry) Michel 2009/12/9, Rick Monteverde : > Stephen wrote: > > <...> I can't help but think any assertion that expressing any particular > belief

Re: [Vo]:Yomiuri reports that Toyota will sell a plug-in hybrid

Terry meant that one doesn't often use brakes on interstate highways, so regenerative braking has no reason to improve mileage. Michel 2009/12/8 Jed Rothwell : > Terry Blanton wrote: > >> > Actually, this one will probably have the ~600 mile range of the regular >> > Prius, or possibly more, beca

Re: [Vo]:Journal Of Applied Science

Yes, good point Robin. BTW, Google is very helpful for this kind of calculations, try Googling: 1e19 MeV per 10 s in kW Michel 2009/12/5 > > In reply to  Michel Jullian's message of Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:02:45 +0100: > Hi, > [snip] > >For instance, the laser > >welding nuclear fusion used by Arata a

Re: [Vo]:Tracking the colorful Quark

2009/12/5 Jones Beene : >> So, who had the foresight to envision the cross-connection? > > Well that remark was not phrased very well, I agree - but if you google > [Julian Schwinger LENR] this will be the first hit: > > www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SchwingerJcoldfusiona.pdf Well, Feynman would have

Re: [Vo]:Tracking the colorful Quark

Jones, QCD comes into play once the reacting nuclear particles are within femtometers of each other. But first, it must be explained how they get that close with sufficient probability, and this is purely a QED problem if I am not mistaken. So, who had the foresight to envision the cross-connecti

Re: [Vo]:Journal Of Applied Science

2009/12/5 Harvey Norris ... > Solid State Nuclear Fusion > http://www.wbabin.net/science/shrair3.pdf This seems to be a very good up to date review of the field, by a Ph.D. candidate in surface physics and electron devices. Full text:

Re: [Vo]:OT (sort of): 2000-2009: the 21 Century decade of Extraordinary claims?

LOL :) 2009/11/29 Terry Blanton : > Followed by a large dose of lyes. > > Terry > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> Terry Blanton wrote: >> >>> Interesting that, before closing the forum, they expelled all the >>> septics. >> >> By flushing them into the septic tank?

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

Jed, (sorry for the late reply, finding it hard to keep up with the high volume of postings lately, could "power contributors" make attempts at conciseness please?) 2009/11/18 Jed Rothwell : > I forgot to mention a critical factor. Heat stimulation of cold fusion > reactions seems to occur remar

Re: [Vo]:Electrolysis Looks Very Weird

http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/33/ Hope this helps (haven't watched the vid but the lecturer, Walter Lewin, is one of the best physics teachers of our times). Michel 2009/11/28 Chris Zell > > Ordinary things often look weird to me.  Like how do zillions of raindrops > create a consistent appear

Re: [Vo]:Is Galileo's DNA still viable?

2009/11/27 Mauro Lacy : >> Free-willing (or is it -weeling? :) friends, > > Hi, > I assume you meant -wheeling. Yes > >> >> Harry, When quantum mechanics appeared the spirit had to accept that there is a LIST of possible ways the universe could unfold. However, even if

Re: [Vo]:DIY electrolytic cell / fuel cell rechargeable battery

2009/11/27 Horace Heffner : > I'd like to see what happens to the bubbles when the battery is > disconnected.  If it really is a fuel cell it should be possible to bubble > O2 and H2 (from another cell) around the separate wires and get a sustained > current. A very good idea, seems quite easy to

Re: [Vo]:Is Galileo's DNA still viable?

Free-willing (or is it -weeling? :) friends, Harry, >> When quantum mechanics appeared the spirit had to accept that there >> is a LIST of possible ways the universe could unfold. However, even if this >> list >> is infinitely long it still means that certain possibilities will be

Re: [Vo]:DIY electrolytic cell / fuel cell rechargeable battery

Horace, 2009/11/26 Horace Heffner : > Here is the original explanation, less the garbled indicator test > information: > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ... > It is the presence of the high concentration of ions in > solution that makes the residual potenti

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >