Re: [Vo]:McKubre visitors who peer-reviewed his lab, then get (unethically) silent

Harry, I don't want to speak for Axil, but from my understanding it is theorized that some manner of photonic-BEC can form in the Nano-cavity. I'm not sure whether it assists fusion or the photons themselves create some novel variety of EM energy. It relies, in ways, on Kim's BEC cluster theory. T

Re: [Vo]:A physicist still unfinformed on huffingtonpost

Vick Stenger is a notorious pseudo skeptical personality. No surprise whatsoever about his opinion on this subject. On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/victor-stenger/fusion-fission-and-fossil_b_4533513.html > > pathetic how far he believes his

Re: [Vo]:A physicist still unfinformed on huffingtonpost

," > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Vick Stenger is a notorious pseudo skeptical personality. No surprise >> whatsoever about his opinion on this subject. >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Alain Sepeda wro

Re: [Vo]:A physicist still unfinformed on huffingtonpost

It is > the major challenge in isolating nuclear waste. > > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > >> I find the idea to burn plutonium (with thorium) a very good idea. >> >> when LENR get mainstream and dominant, we would have to get rid o

Re: [Vo]:[OT] ten core beliefs that most scientists take for granted

*"My suspicion is that many of Sheldrakes 'non-materialist' ideas, such as the idea that memories are not just physical traces in the brain will turn out to be true, but will also turn out to be materialist and grounded in the science that we already understand."* Well I would say many of the idea

Re: [Vo]:"What the future will bring."

Wasn't this sort of speculation answered by David Nagel at ICCF-18? Pretty sure his opinion was that large-scale transmutation plants/projects were impractical and unlikely based on what we know about transmutation rates at this time. Not saying your wrong, just saying this idea is still in the rea

Re: [Vo]:"What the future will bring."

s highly likely, then ways to produce that EMF and > properly direct it will eventually be formulated to affect the nucleus. > When we know how a physical mechanism works in detail, it can be engineers > to provide a desired result. > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Foks

Re: [Vo]:[OT] ten core beliefs that most scientists take for granted

*I like teleology. But I try not to mix teleology with my (hobby) science.* I think its a misconception that teleology and science are mutually exclusive. I think Nagel in Mind and Cosmos, amongst others, makes a convincing argument for this. The neo-Darwinian and Newtonian conception of how we g

[Vo]:Basil Hiley Comments on Theoreticians and Experimental Science

I thought this was an interesting viewpoint expressed by B.J. Hiley, David Bohms longtime collaborator, on the nature of theoreticians and their relationship to experimental science. As he puts it: *I didn’t mind doing it because I think it’s very important if you’re doing theoretical physics to g

Re: [Vo]:Basil Hiley Comments on Theoreticians and Experimental Science

Jed, In a Nutshell: Nano-crack NAE + Hydroton NAS (Nuclear Active Structure) = CF-LENR. A "Micro" sized crack would likely inhibit the reaction (as is well known) rather than facilitate it. The devil is in the details. Regards, John On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Edmun

Re: [Vo]:Basil Hiley Comments on Theoreticians and Experimental Science

of bad reproducibility has >>>> fatally eroded the reputation of cold fusion. >>>> The usual culprits- il-willed, sadistic, stupid, stubborn skeptics- >>>> enjoy the help of the inner. inherent flaws of cold fusion. >>>> All these facts can be simply unde

Re: [Vo]:Basil Hiley Comments on Theoreticians and Experimental Science

*I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of transmutation in spark production* I continue to wonder how EVO factors into LENR, if at all. Shoulders has observed that for whatever reason his experiments do not produce radioactive elements, similar to LENR transmutation results. Now

Re: [Vo]:Basil Hiley Comments on Theoreticians and Experimental Science

ost as follows: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg80263.html > > Let us discuss this > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> *I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of transmutation >> in spark pr

Re: [Vo]:Basil Hiley Comments on Theoreticians and Experimental Science

viously. And it does nothing to show how EVO impacts PdD. On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Edmund Storms wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > > Axil, > > NAE "traps" seem to exist in many forms. DGT seems to have fabricated > "magnetic&qu

Re: [Vo]:Cern Colloquium: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions?

Thanks for stating what the Cold Fusion community figured out 20 years go CERN. And while W-L is likely smoke and mirrors, lack of neutron detection does not refute the theory, because as W-L states their "Ultracold" Neutrons are captured so quickly as to evade detection. Convenient, no? Ultimate

Re: [Vo]:Cern Colloquium: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions?

I'd be shocked if they knew a single iota about how to reproduce the effect. They would actually have had to read a number of CF-LENR papers to do that, and that is a rare thing indeed. They are likely making the same dumb lab errors that early would be replicators made in 1989. Just my speculation

Re: [Vo]:Cern Colloquium: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions?

, btw).* Eric, You are clearly part of the "conspiracy" to promote d+d fusion! j/k :). Great points as always. Regards, John On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > > And while W-L is likely smoke a

Re: [Vo]:Wired UK article on cold fusion

Pretty even handed, straight forward, and well written article. Cleary we are transitioning into that stage of development of a scientific truth that claims "It was self-evident all along". It's on us to make sure the history is not forgotten or revised once the technologies proliferate society and

Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan interviews McKubre about Brillouin

*Sigh. These statements and videos are ludicrous and frankly getting tiresome. 400% 4x .. gimme a break.* Why so cynical? What other "statements and videos" (beside BLP, which is of course stresses credulity as it stands atm) has been released lately that has been such an annoyance? And 3.0 CO

Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan interviews McKubre about Brillouin

uot;Proprietary" .. what a great cover story. Well .. frankly, I'm > tired of 'proprietary'. > There are plenty of good folks doing good science and publishing at > conferences. They are interesting. > > "Proprietary" is not. > > > On W

Re: [Vo]:Nathan Lewis: Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom

Wow the producers of BigThink are really scraping the bottom of the barrel. I remember him being much more articulate and less nervous looking. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:19 PM, James Bowery wrote: > Erratum: He said "hundred" not "thousand". I guess the 900 he left off > were cold fusion. > >

Re: [Vo]:Nathan Lewis: Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom

ervous about now if you were Nathan Lewis? > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Wow the producers of BigThink are really scraping the bottom of the >> barrel. I remember him being much more articulate and less nervous looking. >> >> >>

Re: [Vo]:Sterling Allan interviews McKubre about Brillouin

Excellent analysis Axil. I've never agreed with you more. Regards, John On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Brillouin has both good and bad design items in their system. Starting off > with the bad part, Brillouin uses wire as a substrate for their reaction. > The limited surf

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming out of BLP and McKubre. Yesterday you were complaining about how stupid BLP and McKubre/Brillouin are and how "annoying" they were behaving. Now you see value in these reports, why? And you associate them with Rossi, why? You'

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

others. The >>> skeptics will all howl as usual with MY taking the lead. The only way that >>> the world will accept that Rossi's ECAT is real is for them to be placed in >>> common usage. There has been more than enough evidence already >>> demonstrated. >>&g

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

ould your estimate be? > Probably more interesting than mine. > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> *What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for >> saying 35%. * >> >> *But the reality is 99% of the scient

Re: [Vo]:Has Thane Heins "closed the loop"?

Looks a lot like an N-Machine. I'm not expecting much to materialize from this but looks like an honest effort on the face of it. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:34 PM, H Veeder wrote: > It has been many months since Thane Heins posted videos about his > regenerative acceleration technology. > If his

Re: [Vo]:A Question for Those Who Say the F&P Effect is not "fusion"

When discussing this work three major research programs come to mind (even though there are others): Miles/Bush, McKubre/M4, Frescati/ENEA *Did the 4He come into the apparatus through migration through the glass somewhere along the circuit?* I think this is the most obvious candidate for a potent

Re: [Vo]:Mel Miles letter about ARPA-E Open Ideas

The pervasive group think amongst most in the military-industrial-academic complex is truly amazing. It's like a psychological train-wreck that I can't help but want to rubberneck at, but at the same time the stubbornness to evolve and unwillingness to propel humanity into a sustainable future, whe

Re: [Vo]:LENR monopoles.

There have been several announcements for the discovery of alleged synthetic magnetic monopoles since 2009. This is not something really new; and its relationship to CF-LENR is a huge stretch by any measure at this point. On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > From the comments:

Re: [Vo]:Spin this ...

What accounts for the Heat/Helium correlation in this reaction mechanism? Is it discounted? On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > For the various Spin Doctors on Vortex - > > Here is a magnon-ymous tribute to John Bockris, who passed away last > summer. > Bockris authored over 70

Re: [Vo]:Homopolar generators and the truth of magnetism

The HPG (or more recently known as N-Machine or SPG) is a provocative idea that still defies conventions. I still haven't seen it fully verified to my satisfaction (even after extensive funding for DePalma in late 80s early 90s plus two independent evaluations). I think there is something very prof

Re: [Vo]:The elephant in the room,

Bob, Not to speak for Ed, but I believe he means that if a nuclear process were to take place within an empty lattice vacancy (i.e. the "chemical environment" of the cathode; either in bulk or on the surface) that we would see a number of chemical changes within the system well before a nuclear ef

Re: [Vo]:hydrobetatron

You can google translate it. It's a site put together by a couple Italian university professors who are basically doing an Open Source project on cold fusion. Some of their work involves high school students as well. It's aims are similar to MFMP, but not quite as lofty. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11

Re: [Vo]:Branes <--> LENR

While I appreciate the creativity of the suggestion, I think linking any physical phenomenon to string/brain/M-theory is something of a fools errand. Anything that requires the anthropic principal to justify its existence is no longer a viable scientific theory. It has basically declared a "end to

[Vo]:New Interview with Mats Lewan On E-Cat & Rossi

Hope Y'all enjoy it: Stream/Download MP3 Listen on YouTube

Re: [Vo]:New Interview with Mats Lewan On E-Cat & Rossi

Well that was a while ago now, no? Things can change over close to a years time. Not really that surprising to me. On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > I was surprised by how he described his experience at the Defkalion Milan > demo. That didn't jive with his blog posts whe

Re: [Vo]:New Interview with Mats Lewan On E-Cat & Rossi

Agreed. On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Foks0904 . wrote: > > Well that was a while ago now, no? Things can change over close to a years >> time. Not really that surprising to me. >> > > I think you mean he has reconsidered. Sometimes a

Re: [Vo]:New Interview with Mats Lewan On E-Cat & Rossi

do a lot of the investigation for you. One thing > I do with a journalists is see them report something I'm familiar with and > if they do a good job, then I have more confidence when they report > something I'm not familiar with. > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Fo

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:nice essay Jed

Who's arguing to the contrary? A certain % of Helium can't be trapped in the surface layer why? On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental > results that contradict this fact. > > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Je

Re: [Vo]:New Interview with Mats Lewan On E-Cat & Rossi

e he's rewriting > history. If he said in the interview "at the time they seemed real, but > since then new evidence has come to light..", then he'd sound more credible > to me. > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >>

Re: [Vo]:Kudos to Jed

I agree Alain. No one needs to pity Dr. Kim, I'm sure he (and others) have measured "something" of relevance, just nothing commercially viable. In regards to another point being stated explicitly or eluded to by others on vortex since this story dropped, I think it is rather premature to call "frau

Re: [Vo]:Kudos to Jed

Do you? On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > > Suppose that I had a photo in which Kim was testing a reactor in DGT. > Would that make Jed's source untruthful? > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >

Re: [Vo]:Kudos to Jed

Imagine where CF would be if it had enjoyed the same level of investment and R&D as the failed hot fusion projects, which have produced nothing (well maybe about 1 triumphant second of COP > 1.0) for decades, and continues to get a free pass based on an endless parade of false promises. I much rath

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

I haven't made up my mind one way or another, I want DGT to succeed as I've always had a certain amount of belief in them despite their shortcomings, but in regards to labeling Jed as biased, couldn't the same be said of you? I.e. that it's comforting to think Gamberale is unfairly attacking and tr

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion looked promising at first

risk the flow of rich LENR experimental info for water > boiling mistakes that everybody makes? It is just so unfortunate. > > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> I haven't made up my mind one way or another, I want DGT to succeed as >> I've alw

Re: [Vo]:Nuclear isomer

You see something similar in Andrew Meulenberg's Extended Lochon Model, accept that he emphasizes the importance of electrostatic forces in and around linear NAE. All the best models, I think, are pointing in this direction of a sort of "trap" (whether magnetic or electrostatic). Even Ed's theory p

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

LOL. What a horribly disturbing, consciousness-mutating information matrix we live in. On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Steve High wrote: > As if things weren't bad enough we now learn that solar energy is dimming > the lights. > > http://nationalreport.net/solar-panels-drain-suns-energy-expert

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

Dave, you don't seem to understand that they are America's #1 Independent News Team. Even Halliburton thinks so. What possible motive could they have to mislead us? On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:37 AM, David Roberson wrote: > And someone paid for this discovery? This ranks up there with some of t

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

This is satire right? On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > Dave, you don't seem to understand that they are America's #1 Independent > News Team. Even Halliburton thinks so. What possible motive could they have > to mislead us? > > > On Wed, May

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

ed, It will be truly terrible to suffer through and > impossible to counter... it being bereft of any logic or substance. > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Dave, you don't seem to understand that they are America's #1 Indepe

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

> On 28/05/2014 15:59, Foks0904 . wrote: > > Axil, while this article is hilarious and is on par with much of the > nonsense that comes out of politicized factions such as the > neo-conservatives, I think this is a satirical article on a satirical site. > At least I hope so. If it

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

ossible to tell the difference between an expression > of sincere extremism <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremism> and a > parody of extremism > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Axil, while this article is hilarious and is on par

Re: [Vo]:Solar Panels Drain the Suns Energy Experts Say

oint 47 percent of Americans believed that Obama was > born in Kenya. > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> It's obviously well done and reflective of Poe's Law. Regardless, I don't >> feel stupid for being taken in by a good sat

Re: [Vo]:BlackLight's Second Test of Automated Ignition System

I've never thought Mills is running a confidence game. But I've been critical of BLP because it's perplexing as hell why they have had such issues getting into the public marketplace for over twenty years. They have had issues with patent office in past, etc. but I don't know how far railroading go

Re: [Vo]:The long report about E Cat maybe out any time now.

Probably nothing. If they turn out to have had complete control over the device (i.e. Rossi sold his IP & IH might allow it to be cracked), and produced the same results, that might be something. If any black-box component remains, skeptics will not believe it. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Ja

Re: [Vo]:The long report about E Cat maybe out any time now.

d Rothwell wrote: > Foks0904 . wrote: > > Probably nothing. If they turn out to have had complete control over the >> device (i.e. Rossi sold his IP & IH might allow it to be cracked), and >> produced the same results, that might be something. >> > > I believe th

Re: [Vo]:The long report about E Cat maybe out any time now.

How do you know? On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:30 PM, a.ashfield wrote: > 1. Rossi originally forecast the end of June. Now he is saying week 2 > -3 June. > 2. The testers are said to have full control, short of opening the E-Cat HT > 3. The important new thing is the test was 6 months. We have n

Re: [Vo]:The long report about E Cat maybe out any time now.

Alright thanks. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:18 PM, a.ashfield wrote: > oks0904 . > > Mon, > 02 Jun 2014 14:03:07 -0700 > > > "How do you k

Re: [Vo]:Looking for existing written critics on fleischmann, and replicators, CALORIMETRY

I've asked Charles if he'd seen/heard of any new arguments since he wrote the book (beside Shanahan of course). He said he had seen/heard of none. On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > Hi all, > > after reading the book of Beaudette, who clearly investigated better than > me unt

Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe

I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying the report for the sake of isotopic analysis otherwise? On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Kevin O'

Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe

M, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Why bother with delaying the report for the sake of isotopic analysis >> otherwise? >> > ***For exactly the reason I just detailed: they are using this > information selfishly. > >

Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe

ley wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Kevin, maybe you're right, who knows, but for the most part that >> suggestion is pure innuendo. >> > ***No, it's not pure innuendo, it is partial innuendo. If I had posted

Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe

sinterpreting and getting indignant over nothing. To restate, let's move on with our lives. On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> >> Kevin, you were the one who responded to m

Re: [Vo]:A new barrier to overcome

The conundrum is that neutrons are NEVER seen in LENR reactions. What? While they've not been observed in commensuration with the excess heat, to say they're "NEVER seen" is just wrong. Maybe you're only speaking in reference to NiH? You have to be more clear. You seem familiar with Mizuno's work.

Re: [Vo]:Edmund Storms's new book

I'm still waiting to receive my copy. I'll have more to say then. I'm guessing most haven't gotten around to it either. But generally speaking it deserves some in-depth analysis for sure. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: /

Re: [Vo]:Edmund Storms's new book

ntum coherent resonance or "whispering" (?) effect, right? Ed wrote up a rather lengthy article on his model for a recent issue of JCMNS as well. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Some appetizers to hold you over > > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/28

[Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. We discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape generally -- and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for listening: http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

esources for a graphics artist these days? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without >>>>>>> the sound, like this one >>>>>>

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

> > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed >> is not here to talk for himself: >> >> Axil -- >> >> Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hy

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

ts I think. These are complicated subjects we're dealing with most times. Differences in lexicons are going to exist. Lets deal with them more constructively. If you find me opaque, /shrug. On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 20

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

Malley wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Kevin -- >> >> *Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of >> thermodynamics, and here he does essentially the same thing.* >> >> I don't think he'

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

change course a bit? On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed >> is not here to talk for himself:

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

OK. I got you loud and clear. Thanks. On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > It makes as much sense as a 2-storey outhouse. > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> I'm saying that its not necessary to initiate LENR, but

Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms Explains LENR -- New Interview

embedded by 3 asterisks***. > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Kevin -- I'm not a scientist, its not my theory, take your objections >> directly to Ed >> > ***My responses are to YOU. If you say something about his theory, I'

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

Jones, all your points are well taken, we certainly don't have to agree on everything and there is much in the field that is still "up for grabs", and I think its possible we have different effects going on in PdD vs. NiH as well. I really like how Ed's theory fits PdD, and you may be right about t

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

ctic dust are transition metals, the expected > ash for a LENR reaction. The cosmological LENR reaction in order to > support dark energy and a galaxy size dark matter soliton, production > could not be restricted to only nickel. > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Foks09

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

the underpinning for dark matter and > dark > > energy. In intergalactic gas clouds, many elements are found. > Unexpectedly, > > a high percentage of intergalactic dust are transition metals, the > expected > > ash for a LENR reaction. The cosmological LENR reacti

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

on "pairs") >> >> http://youtu.be/909o_kbCdFg >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: >> > Except that Axil's approach, as it seems to me, is confined to >> plasmatic NiH >> > systems. This is all fine and good and

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

ielectric, and magnetic particles, and > nanowire. These processes are weak but they center on magnetic force > concentration, producing screening sufficient to increase proton tunneling. > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> That demonstration i

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

Axil -- What about systems that don't make use of a cold plasma that generate excess heat? Are these illusory? On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Chemical effects to modify the spin of hydrogen is a doorway through which > the LENR reaction must pass before the LENR reaction c

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

e it as Piantelli does, I suggest > placing the contents of Cravins ball into a cloud chamber and look for > proton emissions.. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Axil -- What about systems that don't make use of a cold plasma that >> gene

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

new direction the community embarks on for the next decade. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > OK, interesting. I'm glad to see you have put forward some testable > predictions. Ed's theory also puts forward some testable predictions, which > is important. I

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

re is nothing conclusive about almost any NiH evidence as far as I'm concerned, even Mills' -- except that it produces excess heat. Regards. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > From: Foks0904 > > I'm glad to see you ha

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

comes to the effect. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* Foks0904 > > > > As you're alluding to, the tritium production is miniscule. Tritium is > produced in an alternative reaction pathway in Ed's model, not the main, > and it can&#

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

:14 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* Foks0904 . > > > > …But in many cases, under the umbrella of a general process, such as > traditional nuclear reactions, despite the difference, the different > isotopes all tend to follow the same general script in terms of how a > rea

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

e problems. I bet I can > explain away these problems. Please give be a shot at that. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It doesn't >> contradict what I wrote in the slightest. Yeah

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

aid, I think BEC is attractive, but not some slam-dunk as a number of vortex posters like to imply. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > *From:* Foks0904 > > > > OK...you sort of lost me. What are you getting at exactly? It doesn't > contradict what I wrote

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

nk that he does but I surly > don't. > > The more people who know how LENR works, the more targets there will be > during the big reveal. But no one is willing to take that path. I want more > target so I am not the only one. Any volunteers? > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

oncentrate on how > hot spots work. PleaseI need more targets. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Thanks for a bit about your background, I appreciate that. But you still >> have two more to go before the toll is paid I'm afraid. >>

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

ed BEC makes a number of leaps of > faith & assumptions that I don't think are yet born out by experiment. > > I could help you go through those many experiments one at a time. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Axil, don't misunder

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: \"The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction\"

Thanks for the comment Jojo. I think you make a fair point(s). On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Jojo Iznart wrote: > In all this talk about the NAE being a Nanowire, a nanotip, a > nanoantenna, a nanomesh, a nanospike, a nano coating on a nano particle, a > nano-this and a nano-that; people

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: \"The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction\"

louds form at the centers of dwarf > galaxies to form a polariton BEC of dark matter carried by interstellar > dust as the substrate that is 10 parsecs in diameter. > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Thanks for the comment Jojo. I

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

the soliton where the reaction is taking place. > > When the magnetic field is weak, virtual particle production catalyzed by > the magnetic field will cause alpha particle ejection from the material in > the reaction zone of the magnetic field. > > I have references for all this stu

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

d a hard time with the demo because of RF interference with their > test equipment and computers. This is caused by nuclear magnetic resanance > active elements that convert magnetic energy to very intense radio waves. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >>

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

OK, so these papers are basically saying hot fusion/fission is occurring in these nano-plasmon environments, right? Now the trick of course is proving that a coherent BEC state, that links together a phase-coherent quantum-system (aka "soliton") then dissipates all that mass energy through systemic

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: \"The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction\"

hanical blockade that makes sure no > one NAE get more energy than the others. > > When there is no BEC formed, a gamma is produced by the sole NAE and the > NAE is destroyed. A LENR system that produces gamma is eating itself up and > will soon fail. > > > On Tue, Ju

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction"

pots as viewed by a infrared camera shows that a BEC has not formed. I has > seen this video. If no hot spots are seen in the lattice of the reactor, > then a BEC has formed. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> OK, so these papers are basically s

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: \"The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction\"

e nano strutures. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Foks0904 . wrote: > >> Axil -- this sounds a bit similar to Widom-Larsen's magic gamma shield. >> Maybe there is evidence for energy distribution in a BEC polariton system >> -- but these are observed onl

Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: \"The Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction\"

lly > die. In a hot system, the BEC dissipates after the reactions have > stopped so it will still protect against after life gamma's. When Rossi ran > his systems cold with little dipole electron production, he did see gammas > at shutdown. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014

  1   2   3   >