Jeffrey Thomas = Jeff Booher
Jeffrey Thomas Booher actually
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JohnnyO
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006
I think Jon is asking about the double VLAN -- or a q in q
implementation
It's extremely useful for creating virtual bridged customer networks
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi Matt,
To throw in a dose of realism -- even if you roll your own Mikrotik solution
- it will most likely cost you more than the $300-600 / unit budget that you
have (and you get ZERO support =)
Example
RB532A: $185
SR5: $105
SR2: $105
All that is is a board and 2 radio cards -- then you
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 2:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] looking for a device
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
Hi Matt,
To throw in a dose of realism
Some interesting statistics -- 30% of the WISPs who attended our last WiNOG
claimed on their surveys they had been in the wireless business for more
than 5 years and had more than 1k wireless CPE deployed in the field
Less than 10% of them claimed to be pure-play license-exempt fixed
wireless
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:35 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] This is HUGE!
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:34 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] This is HUGE!
Some interesting
million in gear last year alone
In the total combined market we still lead, but for sure the real test comes
when all major TEMs field their own 802.16e-2005.
Patrick Leary
AVP Marketing
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: Charles
reality and
utility
of the band in a licensed versus unlicensed allocation. That is why I
support essentially splitting the band.
Patrick Leary
AVP Marketing
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL
manufacturers I have found is
that until there is 3.5ghz or near spectrum available, there will be
small
and limited deployments of wisp size and not many large scale
deployments
outside of 2.5ghz or 700 mhz operators.
-
Jeff
On 5/24/06 6:14 AM, Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
To say the least -- a highly upsetting (to many operators) isse about WiMAX
is the fact that not all WiMAX is created equal...
Sure, WiMAX talks about QoS, ARQ, encryption, scheduled MACs, etc -- but is
it required for base certification today?
Hehe
-Charles
P.S. -- BREAKING NEWS FOR WISP
/06 6:14 AM, Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the same time, the industry doesn't bother to fill out their
Form 477s also
The sad thing is is that there are long term consequences towards
flaunting the rules -- namely the fact that you are just
reinforcing the ILEC argument
to be a shared
license program. IMHO, that means that you will only have to contend
with other operators as opposed to every consumer with a laptop.
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
W/out a license, 3.6 is going to work just as *bad*
You really need 700 (or a 1 GHz band) to really get mobility /
portability
Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the
law w/ a 3650 deployment
---
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Cc: isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:32 AM
Subject: [equipment-l]
You can do a 5 MHz channel size on an Atheros chip (Off the top of my head,
Alvarion Airaya have implemented it so far)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Save the Internet (Net Neutrality)
It is? IIRC, the tariff price of 1.5 meg DSL from BellSouth is $23.95.
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote
I was simply responding to your statement regarding just the last mile
transport. If you want to include other considerations in the discussion
then I don't understand your earlier email.
When considering net neutrality and its implications (e.g., allowing the TV
company to stream video over
OMFG
stunned silence
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 6:31 PM
To: WISPA General List;
Take that article/session with a grain of salt -- as it is being run by an
organization that is supported by vendors trying to *sell* the concept of
muni-wifi
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
One thing to remember -- when buying and selling a business (or anything for
the matter) there has to be benefits on both sides (e.g., a win-win
solution)
Just as you are trying to maximize all your time and effort put into your
company, the buyer needs to be able to see a light at the end of the
Title: Message
Here
isone possible source for the information that you are looking
for
http://www.cwlab.com/testing_criteria.htm
-Charles
---CWLabTechnology
Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FWIW -- there is a WISP in contact with the Lt Governor's Office and Crain's
about servicing this customer (they have a tower ~ 4 miles from the physical
location)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
: 'WISPA General List'Subject: [WISPA] Charles Wu
email ?
Charles whats you
email, I lost my drive new
laptop
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless
Broadband Corp.
tel
787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
agreed, VL is far from carrier grade
On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
snip
Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier
Title: Message
Hi
Patrick,
I had
an interesting discussion with an Alvarion rep at WiNOG who implied that
Alvarion is reevaluating its position towards and is showing greater interest
again in the license-exempt service provider market
This
confirms that rumor =)
Good
to see you back
Does anyone provide coverage in Willis, OK -- have a business account lead
(contact offlist)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon
snip
Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier market, not the WISP
market.
/snip
Ah, the mis-perceptions of the rugged metal enclosure =)
Steve, can you please explain why carriers would prefer a
Higher ARPU WISPs in the business are selling their services as WiMAX
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of KyWiFi LLC
Sent: Tuesday,
snip
That is correct, however those companies are expected to be shipping
product ( and are taking pre orders ) that will comply with the
testing whenever the gods at wimaxforum decide to get off their
collective arses and certify 5.8. Airspan for example, already has
wimax 4.9 product
and Airspan.
What do you know Charles?
George
Charles Wu wrote:
Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock
Alvarion,
since almost every 5 GHz PtMP WISP manufacturered product out
there is also
based on a similar chipset)
Alvarion BreezeMAX (they're product pending WiMAX
that unlicended Wimax will be
available with Aperto and Airspan.
What do you know Charles?
George
Charles Wu wrote:
Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock
Alvarion, since almost every 5 GHz PtMP WISP manufacturered product
out there is also based on a similar chipset
snip
Maybe we should be branding our service as Wi-Fiber. or Maybe Ethernet
Internet Access (of course like end users will know what Ethernet means.)
/snip
Spend trying to build a new brand around Wi-Fiber or just ride Intel /
WiMAX Forum's Marketing machine...
Here's the thing, chances
Alvarion VL is based on a WiFi chipset (this isn't meant to knock Alvarion,
since almost every 5 GHz PtMP WISP manufacturered product out there is also
based on a similar chipset)
Alvarion BreezeMAX (they're product pending WiMAX certification) doesn't
operate in 5 GHz
-Charles
6:10 PMTo:
WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 5
Title: Message
Charles you make a good point, but Im going to throw a but in
here:
but
the Orthogon / Canopy 300 radios will run also run at:
64
QAM .92 dual -62 receive
sensitivity
+18 output (252.9
throughput)
64
QAM .75 dual -68 receive
sensitivity
+18 output (206.7 throughput)
AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles Wu wrote:
In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
following results with the Spectra @ the 300 Mbps data rate
1 Way TCP Max: 143 Mbps
2 Way BiDirectional TCP Max: 98.1 / 105 Mbps
Hi Matt,
To answer your questions from my relatively limited sales marketing
point of view
RFC 2018 SACK
Yes it is enabled -- if you purchase a copy of our report, it shows the
exact system parameters configured on the box (basically, sysctl -a | grep
tcp)
RFC 896 Nagle
Can you please
for $15 to $16k wheras a
Licensed link goes from $20k and up...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:46 PM
Title: Message
but
with 2' on the Spectra, you're likely only to get about 60 Mbps of REAL
THROUGHPUT at 10+ miles =(
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
The Spectra
would be around $20k with external antennas. A licensed product is going to be
at least that, and probably $5k more.
Sit
back and actually think for a second about this comparison, and you'll realize
thata similarly performing"unlicensed" solution will cost
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point generally
Less than 45Mbps licensed.
Hi Matt,
I am curious to see where / what you got those numbers for the Orthogon
Spectra?
-Charles
snip
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links that spans 5 hops. Distances between hops range
anywhere from 7 to 19 miles.
Can anyone recommend a licensed radio manufacturer that should net us
50Mb-100Mb per hop?
/snip
Hi Bobby,
From
Title: Message
another WISP / ISP OSS vendor to check out is Airpath Wireless - www.airpath.com
They
come from the WiFi side, and are trying to do a few interesting things for fixed
wireless ISPs (in respect to roamingideas, etc)
-Charles
---WiNOG
Join us this month in Austin, TX at WiNOG, the premier forum for the
exchange of technical information and discussion of specific implementation
issues that organizations involved in the design, deployment and operation
of wireless networks face on a daily basis.
CPT300: ADVANCED CANOPY TECHNICAL
What are the subs that I have to have to get a system like this???
Jory Privett
WCCS
Hi Jory,
Are you coming to WiNOG? The people from Adzilla will be there, so you can
meet them first-hand and talk with them directly
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
Title: Message
Like
it or not, it is worth noting that p0rn accounts for a VAST OVERWHELMING
MAJORITY of Internet traffic
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I think everyone of us need to be in our own VoIP business!! I have even
given thought to a Coop kind of deal, but I need to have some more beer and
thoughts on that :-)
/snip
Mac,
You need some BEER -N- WIRELESS GEAR
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin,
snip
We pay
between $0.002 to $0.005 per minute on average for domestic long distance.
/snip
Matt,
Out of curiosity...do you mean 2-5 cents per minute? Or 0.2 to 0.5 cents per
minute?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
Jory
Give me a call 773.326.4614 x534 and I'll try to work something out for you
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jory
Title: Message
Have
you looked at Airaya's web site?
It's
pretty informative: http://www.airaya.com/products/p2m.asp
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generally, we end up debating all day and all night on the lists of what's
the best radio or who's got those cool blue lights -- however, FWIW, I've
noticed that there seldom is any debate on useful topics like sales
marketing (especially of the product positioning of license-exempt wireless)
Do
Title: Message
East
Coast Snow =(
Go
Rockies -- east coast is WAY too icy
-Charles
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
13-15, 2006http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
service.
All of the above means that while we are a seemingly large WISP, we
don't have that many customers; our ARPU is just very high.
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
Generally, we end up debating all day and all night on the lists of
what's the best radio or who's got those cool blue lights
personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net
sales inquiries to: purchasing at neofast dot net
Fast Internet, NO WIRES!
-
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: isp-wireless@isp
snip
Maybe you stumbled upon the fact that no one offers what you want
because it isn't cost effective to do so. As much as we try to wholesale
our VoIP offers to other WISPs, they want their cake and eat it too.
Being an ISP or for that matter a VoIP provider requires either relying
on
Title: Message
Hi
Matt,
Your
questions on the Skyway 7000 Trango Atlas would be answered by our
Backhaul Bash Report (costs $3k)
or--you can go to WiNOG and see a presentation of the results
live
http://www.winog.com/austin_2006/sessions/day3_backhaul1.htm
Title: Message
Are there any notes from the session? The
winog website doesnt show anything.
it's
one of those things where you "kinda have to be there"
Also, you mention the login script is broken
on wispreviews.com but I cant even browse the forms as a guest.
Here's
the problem
Due
: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900MHz performance (Latency, Throughput)
Charles Wu wrote:
P.S. I'm still looking for a goodphp guy to help fix things here
The first step would be to stop using PHP or for that matter any other
language
91-2884 (c)BLOG: http://lindaleepond.blogspot.com/
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:18
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Wispcon?
Hi
Linda,
This is what Steve Stroh has to say a
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900MHz performance (Latency, Throughput)
Charles Wu wrote:
Do you have any better suggestions?
What are your requirements?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Title: Message
old
news =)
that
was covered at the last WiNOG
http://www.winog.com/park-city_2005/sessions/day2_900mhz_bakeoff.htm
another place to check is http://www.wispreviews.com (the login
script is broken, but if you fiddle around with it, you should be able to get
in)
-Charles
.
WiNOG targets WISPs that are well
beyond the startup phase in longevity of business, overall scale of business,
network, and number of customers, but have not yet grown to have their needs met
by the three larger conferences. This is a very real, but specialized market
segment, and Charles Wu
Title: Message
Hi
Chris,
Here
is something that Steve Stroh (who is a member of this listserv and who speaks
at ALL shows including WISPCON, ISPCON, WiNOG) wrote about
WiNOG
http://www.winog.com/austin_2006/vendors/what_i_learned_at_winog.pdf
(P.S.
-- he wasn't paid by us to do this or
Recently, there have been some misleading advertisements promising turn-key
3.65 GHz licensing services as a means of avoiding interference in congested
license-exempt ISM/UNII bands. Although the FCC issued adopted rules back
in March 2005 to open access to new spectrum for wireless broadband in
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the radio.
A small bit of trivial regarding this issue
With higher order modulation schemes, the EVM (Error Vector Magnitude) can
be so high that even on a
That's why many, on a quarterly basis, liberally apply their WiFi
Lubrication -- keeps things well oiled and humming
http://j-walk.com/other/wifispray/
wink
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original
it has the Chester cheese doodle mount
Lol...would you mind posting a pic of what such a mount looks like?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
ndors have to learn
when they mistreat someone there will be fallout - I think a public open list
is the perfect place to post reviews on products and vendors. How else
will others know ? Whisper it into everyone's ear ?JohnnyOOn
Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:09 -0600, Charles Wu wrote:
Hi
Hi Paul,
I haven't been paying attention to this thread close enough to know your
exact situation, but it is worth noting that there are always extrra
headaches to deal with when trying to jerry-rig consumer grade hardware
Remember the days of KarlNet ORiNOCO?? Back in those days, when using
snip
Despite working for a WISP, I can't get my company's service at my house. If
it were available here, I'd be a Speakeasy customer in no time, because
they're so friendly to the geek market.
/snip
Out of curiosity -- how does allowing connection sharing qualify as being
friendly to the geek
Not to kick a dead horse here, but I heard the other day (from a WISP friend
of mine) that Commpartners has stop installing WISP residential connections
(due to E911 compliance issues) for the time being
This sucks for him since he's already paid the $5k setup fee and his 1500+
wireless customers
Title: Message
Just
an FYI - Shayne's contact info was incorrect, revised is as
follows...
Shayne Rose
Director of Channel
Sales
IP Phone 949-429-4757
Fax
949-487-3340
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.simplesignal.com
---WiNOG Austin, TXMarch
Hi Matt,
Can you please shed some light on your 3.65 GHz license?
To my knowledge (and we work with the FCC on licensing almost on a daily
basis) -- 3.65 GHz is not yet legally licensable for commercial common
carrier applications
-Charles
---
WiNOG
Hi Brian,
XL Microwave makes a spectrum analyzer that is extremely easy and simple to
use
It doesn't have all the add-ons that an anritsu or rhode and shwarz unit
will provide, but for the normal user -- those extra buttons / knobs
confuse more than anything else
I believe that they have a
Regarding Avcom
The Avcom units require extra modules to go beyond 2.4
On a tower, trying to plug-in something else is kind of a hassle
From an ease of use perspective, I would recommend that you find a 1 piece
spectrum analyzer...that covers all the bands
You'll appreciate it when you're
on the private WISPA list. The FCC is
giving 3.65Ghz licenses for experimental purposes, which you can use to
provide customers with service. However, it may not be a wise business
decision to rely on experimental spectrum, which can go away at any time.
-Matt
Charles Wu wrote:
Hi Matt,
Can you
Again, they should be held accountable for what they have built with
PUBLIC MONEY.
IMO, it's nearly impossible to do a 1/2 and 1/2 type of model
I doubt there is any service provider out there who HAS NOT benefited in
some manner from PUBLIC MONEY at some time (or who would want to close the
door
snip
performance to their VOIP servers over our network. Think about it, do you
think I'm going to allow the same performance to our competitive VOIP
provider as I do to our own VOIP services? By getting us to be a Partner for
them, we'd optimize them for our own benefit, and indirectly Comm
Trees are sponges -- there is no scatter with them
That said, you're are causing yourself undue headache trying to do NLoS with
2.4 -- especially when 900 MHz is readily available
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
Title: Message
snipYou seem
to be taking this beyond what anyone has stated. There maybe those
that say the things that you claim above, however what yousaid was that
"...preference of one's own traffic...is not that muchdifferent than..." and
you went on to show a link to a story thatwas
snip
You guys haven't been going to enough conferences and listening to very
bright people like Kris Twomey try and explain such things to the
(W)ISP industry. Shame on that Michael Anderson for putting Kris up in
front of an audience to try to keep the WISP industry informed.
/snip
Thought
Out of curiosity -- how did that end up? Where you able to prove my
naysaying wrong?
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
I know you don't support the idea of group buys.
It's not that I don't support the concept, truthfully, I could care less
whether you buy your gear from a distributor, reseller, or direct from the
manufacturer
I have just seen it implemented (rather unsuccessfully) many times by ISPs
such as
Brian, I commend you on taking the initiative and (hopefully) proving my
naysaying wrong
However, waving my magic wand (or maybe I'm just full of @[EMAIL PROTECTED]), I
predict
the following 2 outcomes will occur:
1. Brian will not be able to get enough interest / coordination / payment
for the
Butch,
Technically, none of the necessities are ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL to survival
If you didn't have electricity, you *could* light a candle
If you didn't have heat in the winter, you *could* go chop firewood in the
forest
If there was no running water, you *could* bring a bucket to the nearby
snip
For example, electricity, gas and water are items that are needed for basic
survival in the city. Granted, these services have not always been
available, but it is expected by all Americans that if they move somewhere,
they can get those services. Most people would not survive without these
The elecric company doesn't care what you do with their electricity... The
gas company doesn't care what you do with their gas... The water company
doesn't care what you do with your water...
Why should the ISP care what you do with your connection, as long as it
doesn't affect their network?
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NYCwireless Network Neutrality Broadband Challenge
Scriv
Charles Wu wrote:
Electricity, Gas and Water are billed on a usage basis
Competitive market pressures aside, why should Internet be any
different?
-Charles
---
CWLab
snip
Trying to put in more towers makes no sense as there could never be enough
of them to properly penetrate these vibrant green hillsides. We need the TV
frequency. The physics of the frequencies making up the over the air
television bands make them ideal for broadband deployment.
/snip
Hi
WISPA was started initially in response to Part-15/WISPCON's lack of
representation of true WISP issues (although you can't fault Mike for it, it
needs to be known that Part-15.org is a FOR-PROFIT organization existing to
put money in Mike's pocket).
Until recently (due to circumstances created
Last I understood, Part-15 was also a Non-Profit.
That's the sham
Although .org domain names are traditionally reserved for non-profit
institutions, there is nothing within ICANN policy preventing a for-profit
organization from registering a .org domain
A quick who-is of Part-15.org
snip
It should be noted that of all organizations mentioned above that WISPA
is the only one that is federally recognized under CFR # 501c6 as a
non-profit trade association.. Every other entity listed above is
working to make a profit in their efforts and as such would likely be
looking to
Have you read the Part-15 report to the FCC?
http://www.broadbandwirelessreports.com/pressreleases/files/FCC%20Briefing%2
009152005.pdf
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
great...so WISPA should be able to do THEIR OWN
presentation
in
addition to the $500 donation for a WISPA designated attendee...I can volunteer
PR graphic resources to help with publicity and to put the presentation
together
-Charles
Charles Wu has left the equipment sales business (e.g., we don't sell gear)
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Al Grantier
Sent
I am working with the e-NC on organizing their upcoming Southeast Wireless
Symposium (November 16 - 17, 2005) to be held in Asheville, NC - this is a
wireless show focused on government
http://www.e-nc.org/Wireless2005/index.asp
While it's not the FCC, we are putting together a keynote session on
I agree w/ Alex and will take this one step further
Mike has a history of taking undue credit for other's actions
At this risk of sounding anti Part-15, in order for WISPA to establish
credibility to its members and the FCC, it needs to be able to stand on its
own 2 feet as a separate
Congratulations Charles, so now we have a little Wu I'm sure you're a
proud father. That's great.
Well not yet...in about 2-4 weeks (depending on how things go)
I'm not trying to start an argument here but WISPA was not invited to
attend this function. We received very late notice about the
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 5:53 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Need Inputs From Hurricane Relief WISP Teams
ForFCCPresentation on Thursday
I agree w/ Alex
Canopy 900 has close to 4 Mb of aggregate *REAL* thoughput now in 2x mode
-Charles
---
WISPNOG Park City, UT
http://www.wispnog.com
August 15-17, 2005
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
I take it from this post regarding Canopy that the other systems you
tested were not as much speed?
Yes
If you want to compare then let us see what you have seen for all the
systems you have tested. Let's compare apples to apples.
We have already done that
-Charles
--
WISPA Wireless
301 - 400 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
