Does anyone operate in Indianapolis?
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - Telecom Agent
813.963.5884
www.rad-info.net
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Mark,
Enough with the analogies.
CALEA is law - not once but twice - 1934 and 1996.
Courts have upheld the FCC decision on what CALEA covers.
The same laws that give the DOJ the right to wiretap, gives the FCC the
right to create guidelines.
I don't like it, any more than I like ATT letting
Sam,
The content rights owners are strong - and a PITA.
There business model revolves around record once, sell thousands of
times to the same consumer.
That model of course is broken - and Gen Y disregards it.
If the RIAA and the MPAA keep pushing, a group may get together and sue.
Like
There are 3rd party vendors, like IP Fabrics with CALEA compliance gear.
For data it shouldn't be that big of a deal since the Edge Router
(connecting your WAN with your upstream) should be able to be tapped, if
you use what I will call a brand name (Cisco, Juniper, Redback, blah,
blah and
Clint Ricker wrote:
It is true that cable and telco backbones can't handle a simultaneous
sustained 1Mb/s to all of their subscribers; last mile is the most
talked about limitation; however, transport to the node is a major
limitation although less so as many service providers are upgrading to
One reason would be so that your voice and opinion are heard.
Maybe you and Mark can take Board seats and WISPA would take a turn
towards your view of how things should be.
Rarely does an ISP association represent the views of the louder minority.
Since it is volunteer and made up of
I haven't joined yet either. Three reasons:
(1) I would have to join as a vendor, since I am a consultant - and I
can't as yet see the ROI.
(2) I see the similarities here to another group that I belonged to ...
and I don't want to go down that path again.
(3) I have a real problem with
Gary Kim at Fat Pipe makes some interesting predictions about WiMax here
(http://www.fatpipeonline.com/showArticle.php?id=60)
In 2010, the forecasted WiMAX subscriptions in North America will
represent 2 percent of that for mobile 2.5G/3G and 66 percent of the
subscriptions for mobile data
Ericsson Deals Blow to WiMAX
First major telecoms equipment maker to quit WiMAX in favor of 3G mobile
data.
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21764hed=Ericsson+Deals+Blow+to+WiMAX
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
ISP-Planet has a blurb on CALEA:
WISPs take note: Baller law group's Key Legal and Technical Requirements and
Options for CALEA (http://www.baller.com/pdfs/BHLG-CTC_CALEA_Memo.pdf). This
is especially important if you don't know about the March 12 and May 14
deadlines. Kris Twomey can help you
An interesting little story about the DMCA, the NFL and a lawyer.
http://tinyurl.com/22cp6l
or
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070320-nfl-fumbles-dmca-takedown-battle-could-face-sanctions.html
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
: [WISPA] CALEA
It may also be of interest to note that companies such as ourselves
have the ability to provide lawful intercept in compliance with CALEA
for our single-homed downstream ISP customers assuming there is no
NAT involved.
-Matt
Peter R. wrote:
ISP-Planet has a blurb on CALEA
I tracked down the patents and the verdict. I had to dig through PACER
and pay about $4 to get it (you pay for every page that you query on
PACER. To register you have to give a valid credit card).
Details here:
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2007/03/case-106-cv-00682-cmh-brp.html
If you want
I just can't tell if they mean Cellular or Wireless or both. (I don't
think they know either).
Wireless Internet an Information Service, FCC Says
http://www.phoneplusmag.com/hotnews/73h2210431.html
Posted on:
Prices are creeping up on T1 because ILEC's are unregualted on special
access circuits - the very copper T1 that runs the loop to your door.
ILEC's are unregulated on fiber and special access.
And in 2 markets QWest doesn't have to sell loops at all. If VZ gets its
petition this year, in 6
Hughes Network Systems is a strategic Nextlink partner, providing its
LMDS AIReach AB9400 system in both point-to-point and
point-to-multipoint modes to support Nextlink's high-speed Internet
access and Ethernet services.
Peter R. wrote:
XO Communications today launched broadband wireless
http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/20/earthlink-unveils-wifi-phone-beta-in-anaheim-ca/
Earthlink's finally ready to publicly discuss the WiFi phone beta
they've been running in Anaheim California -- well, kind of. They didn't
exactly have much to say about the service because it's in beta, but we
XO Communications today launched broadband wireless services in Phoenix,
bringing its NextLink wireless footprint to 10 major cities. XO will
initially deploy in downtown Phoenix but plans its base station sites to
cover the entire Phoenix metropolitan area including Paradise Valley,
http://gigaom.com/2007/03/13/white-space-broadband/
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
Towerstream launched its wireless broadband service in Miami metropolitan
area. This is company's its eighth fixed WiMAX network in the U.S. -
previous cities include New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle Boston, San
Francisco and Providence/Newport. A map of the regions covered by
At least I can understand that differentiation.
Every show has a Wireless proponent. To me that means either wi-fi or
fixed wireless.
To people that should know better, it usually means the discussion will
focus on cellular or EVDO.
Annoying.
- Peter
Patrick Leary wrote:
This is just the
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2007/03/15/can_you_e_mail_me_now/
Boston is taking a different slant on the whole Muni thing.
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
Matt Liotta wrote:
It seems premature to suggest that Clearwire is tanking. When you
consider that an additional 4 million shares were issued and that the
overall market is currently down, I think their stock has move as
expected. I bought in at $20.68 and am quite happy with my position.
Matt Liotta wrote:
wispa wrote:
Ok, Clearwire expects to continue to build out. They expect to spend
1.1 billion, and market hacks expect them to triple the customer base
over the next year or so.
So, even next year, they're going to spend between 3 and 4 times
their gross revenue.
Not to compare it to a skunk, but look at Vonage stock.
Tanked quick despite their accounting methods.
(Sure some of that was from the patent lawsuit, but it was fading before
that).
- Peter
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
George Rogato wrote:
wispa wrote:
It depends on who provides you the figures...
People go to jail when those figures are wrong.
Sometimes they do.
The key to GAAP Accounting is that you have to be consistent.
SO if in your first quarter you decide that hardware is in this column
and
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Isn't Clearwire's value irrelevent? If we have lots of extra money
sitting around to invest, shouldn't we be investing it in ourselves
for a higher return and less risk?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
Actually, if you have lots of
Tom,
I think your PC or laptop clock is off.
Did you ever reset or patch for Daylight Savings time this past Sunday AM?
BTW, did anyone notice that recurring outlook appointments were messed
up with the new DST?
- Peter
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
I will be speaking at ISPCON this Spring, so plan to attend.
ISPCON SPRING 2007 • May 23-25 • Orlando, FL
The Rosen Centre Hotel is the headquarters hotel for ISPCON Spring 2007.
Discounted hotel rooms of $175 per night are available, but only until
April 20! [The HoJo nearby is just $59 per
Sierra Wireless Inks Deal For AirLink
Sierra Wireless Inc. inked a definitive agreement to acquire privately
held AirLink Communications Inc., a developer and supplier of fixed,
portable and wireless data solutions for industrial and public-safety
applications.
--
WISPA Wireless List:
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/22147.html
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2007/03/clearwire-update.html
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
While doing some research this morning, I came across the name of the
CALEA Consultant for the DOJ, FBI, and DEA. )I'm now trying to get a
phone or email).
Any way, CALEA was brought up in the Brand-X case. Here's the summary of
the brief FYI:
Law Enforcement advanced the theory that
During the Brand-X Supreme Court case, the DEA, the FBI and the DOJ
clearly spelled out that ISP and VoIP traffic would need to be CALEA
compliant. It isn't the FCC, it is the DOJ.
Your statements take us back to all the lobbying efforts that CLEC's
and ISP's have ever done:
Don't regulate
excellent thread:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=67031sid=100a5b7521057953a31a8ecf60bed196
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
wispa wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:47:20 -0400, Peter R. wrote
During the Brand-X Supreme Court case, the DEA, the FBI and the DOJ
clearly spelled out that ISP and VoIP traffic would need to be CALEA
compliant. It isn't the FCC, it is the DOJ.
Oh, please. The DOJ doesn't write law
Sam Tetherow wrote:
Peter R. wrote:
During the Brand-X Supreme Court case, the DEA, the FBI and the DOJ
clearly spelled out that ISP and VoIP traffic would need to be CALEA
compliant. It isn't the FCC, it is the DOJ.
Your statements take us back to all the lobbying efforts that
CLEC's
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
In the end, they'll get theirs. What goes around comes around.
Someone will finally have had enough of their arrogant attitudes and
things will change. I know they are building stores all over the
place, and they are always packed. But someone somehow will find a
If you ALL joined one organization you would have a well-funded group to
fight this.
But most ISP's, WISP's, Hosts, and VoIP Providers don't pay for
membership any where.
Great at bitching. Champion, PhD bitching, but actually put up time and
money to make one single org work, not so much.
I attended the Voice Peering Forum in Miami Beach Thursday and Friday.
Acme Packet and SS8 gave presentations on Lawful Intercept.
I will gladly email the 2 PDF's to you, if you send me your company
name, address and phone.
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - the NSP Strategist
(813)
An interesting stat:
*The firm said its total hotspots now number 48,000 in 79 countries,
including nearly 15,000 hot spots in the US.*
ATT reported Thursday that it has added 13,000 Wi-Fi hotspots,
accessible by its ATT Remote Access customers, at locations including
airports, hotels, and
http://news.com.com/2061-10812_3-6164554.html
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
wispa wrote:
The RIGHT way this is to be done, is for the FCC to un rule we're
telecommunications providers, the same for VOIP and so on, and let the DOJ
and FBI go back to Congress, who re-writes the rules, and supplies the funds
to implement whatever it is they really want, and complies
Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
I have a very tough time trying to figure out who is 'friendly'
'Sympathetic' to the cause of the ISP's at the FCC.
What you all have to remember is that the FTC and the FCC are supposed
to watch over the CONSUMERS.
Not small businesses, but the end user.
--
At The FCC: Wireless Broadband Petition File Grows Fatter
NetfreeUs LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of wireless broadband provider Speedus
Corp., has joined the first-responder-service fray, asking the Federal
Communications Commission for authority to manage a new nationwide Wireless
Public
Mark,
If you have access to reach millions, why don't you activate that little
network and get them to sway the government to your cause?
The can't, won't, forcibly stuff on a public, archived email list is yet
another example of why the government does not like to deal with small
wispa wrote:
Call on your VOIP phone because the house caught fire? Why not just email
the fire department? Gee, I'm sorry, but what on earth was he thinking?
He didn't know any better?
He thinks that dial-tone is dial-tone?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Blair Davis wrote:
We do not support nor recommend the use of VoIP phones as a
replacement for wired or cellular phones. While you are welcome to
use one on our network, we are not responsible for service failures
and/or outages that may affect your VoIP phones and we provide no
support for
On World Releases Study of Muni Wireless Market in N.A.
---
On World has released Muni Wireless Broadband: Service Oriented Mesh-ups, a new study highly based on more than 300 interviews, examines the emergence of municipal wireless networks
Mark,
Since you seem to watch what happens in DC and dislike it, have you
managed to pick up on the fact that the small guy usually does not have
any sway in DC?
How does a group whose very existence depends on the benevolence of the
FCC tell the FCC off?
DC is about give a lot, get a
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I don't have any issues with the way DC works, but I disagree with the
statement that it is not possible to lobby for Regulate them, not Me.
You can disagree all you want, but history in telecom since 1996 proves
that this strategy doesn't work.
There was a CompTel
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/21857.html
(As if there weren't enough social sites and lists to fragment the industry)
Wireless Factors, a Reston, Va.-based business network, now is offering
professionals what it claims is the wireless industry's first
relationship-powered network.
Wireless
It's all about perception and expectations.
Marketing is about setting them.
Sales is about managing them.
BTW, 15% take rate is about average for any service.
VZ FiOS has about a 8-18% take rate depending on whose numbers you use.
VoIP take rates are similar. If there are 5000 BB customers on
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Feb. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- As more consumers turn their
backs on traditional landline telephone service, analysts see Internet
telephony going mainstream in the next two years. Projections indicate
there will be 32 million Internet phone lines while traditional
residential
Even at 51% be sure that the contract contains the following:
- that you get 51% of the voting and decision making.
- How everyone exits.
- What are their responsibilities.
- What about a stale-mate - How is that handled?
You probably have a lawyer with you who specializes in corporate or
Or until the FCC continues to allow you to be in business.
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Yeah I disagree. If I shut down its because I get tired, not because
I get run out. There becomes a point, when the only big cost is roof
space, and a big company tends to pay more for roof rights. When I'm
debt
Small business owners have many resources for help.
The local university, small business development centers, SCORE.org, and
many others.
There are finance companies that can help with the leasing - or
sometimes the manufacturer can help you find one.
For every problem there is a solution.
Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
We are looking to start offering VOIP to our customers. What are your
suggestions to get started? Roll our own? Resell somebody elses? Also
what things should I avoid, or common mistakes?
Thanks for any advice you can give.
_
/-\ ndrew
It depends on whether
9.) WISPA is run by a volunteer board of operators at this time. To become
a truly effective trade association, we must look to hire a full time staff
which will form procedures, policy, update website content, email members,
collect dues, manage books, lobby more effectively and work through
http://stpete.org/news/021507.htm
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Dylan Oliver wrote:
I agree with Brian - a Pew Internet study would give the most respected
results. Perhaps the other group wants to chip in.
Best,
You could probably get a University marketing professor to do it.
Cost? Not much more than $500.
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. -
Many of you probably don't follow the FCC much, so let me tell you about
the stroke of a pen:
UNE-P which was the magic bullet for CLECs. No facilities needed. Rock
bottom pricing on voice lines. Market and sell. Z-Tel and a few others
had over 500k lines. Unfortunately, they didn't listen
I was just asking you to examine what the true costs are of delivering
service.
You correct about the unused BW - and for most BW is a fixed monthly
cost, same as rent, tower, payroll.
All that needs to be considered when tackling pricing.
Back in the T1 days, the over-subscription was
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
You make good points... however, the better question is how much money
did Z-Tel take out of the business during this time? I would bet the
owners and investors made BIG money during this time... so, so what if
they are out of business now? If they made millions
Larry,
Great ideas! It would take some time, people and money to contact each
one.
Think of all the memberships you could acquire :)
Now we need some ideas on how to do the contacting.
Any FTC or FCC money available for that??
Frank, something more helpful would have been better than the
wispa wrote:
Once we're a regulated industry, and at this point the FCC and Congress are
SERIOUSLY attempting to take control the WISP and ISP business, we exist, or
we do not exist, at the stroke of a pen, totally at the WHIM of someone who
neither knows, nor cares, whether we live or die,
Jeff,
Who wrote this?
One fact worth noting is the wireless number. It mostly means cellular.
Cellular is not a third competitor.
- Peter
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
Note the Wireless portion of the growth from last year:
REVIEW OUTLOOK
Broadband Breakout
February 16, 2007; Page
Microsoft Corp., Google Inc. and four other technology companies plan to
submit a prototype of a new handheld device to U.S. regulators for
testing, as they press the government to free up airwaves for wireless
Internet access,” reports The Seattle Post-Intelligencer
He is talking about cellular broadband, not UL wireless.
Frank Muto wrote:
http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_110/110-resp.FCC.020707.Chairman.resp%20to%20our%2013107%20ltr.pdf
See page seven, second to last paragraph;
The Commission is also considering an order that would classify
INLINE
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Scriv,
The particular paragraph that I pointed out that this was timely
because of the 700MHz Auction. After reading the pdf file that Frank
posted it looks like Martin feels that there is enough UL spectrum in
the 5Ghz range to last WiFi providers far into the
http://techdirt.com/articles/20070205/165735.shtml
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
If you are going to offer Businesses VOIP service, try to build a better
service than Vonage.
I'm on calls all day with people on Vonage or home-grown VOIP that
terminate calls via the Internet.
99% of those calls sound like a below average cell phone call.
Jitter and latency beat up the
Certainly, licensed wireless links and managed firewall delivered by
your team would be cheaper to deliver; faster to deploy; and just as
reliable as fiber?
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.
John Scrivner wrote:
I am afraid they will just build fiber business plans and not give
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/21521.html
Tropos Networks signed its 500^th customer - a milestone in the muni
wireless-mesh-growth battle in which Tropos is battling Cisco for the
Number One market position.
Win Number 500 is Las Vegas, N.M. - a city of about 15,000 (gee, a
single hotel in
New tower could double wireless firm's business
Baltimore Business Journal
http://baltimore.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2007/02/05/story13.html?t=printable
Southaven builds its own wireless network with city-owned
MagnoliaWave
Memphis Business
FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine
http://www.atsp.org/government/programs.asp?contentID=1895FullStory=.
Association of Telehealth Service Providers
The FCC has recently announced a two-year pilot program that would fund
up to 85% of the costs for the design, construction and
IPTV is such a losing proposition. At 4MB to 10MB per stream, how do you
make $$? And most homes have more than one TV - so doouble or triple it.
The content costs keep increasing - at the same time that episodes are
available for download.
The equipment is ridiculously expensive. Scale IS
I only read the B.S. from Harry Potter about how wonderful things are
with him large and in charge.
Then I read Copps' statement :)
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE KEVIN J. MARTIN, CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Before the Committee on Commerce, Science
Transportation, U.S.
Released: 01/31/2007. WTB ANNOUNCES THAT M2Z NETWORKS, INC.'S
APPLICATION FOR LICENSE AND AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE A NATIONAL BROADBAND
RADIO SERVICE IN THE 2155-2175 MHZ BAND IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. (DA No.
07-492). (Dkt No 07-16).
WTB. Contact: Joel Taubenblatt at (202) 418-2487, email:
Brian Webster wrote:
http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070201/FREE/70201010/100
1/FREE
This applies to the licensed spectrum holders but could be interesting to
unlicensed as it might make life easier for carriers like Clearwire and
shape the field for competition. A topic
Victor Mattison said Access US has a $4.3 million wireless Internet deal
with the USDA.
http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2007/01/29/story13.html?t=printable
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2007/01/brick-network-acquired-by-access-us.html
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.
January 16, 2007
ATT to offer $20 'naked' DSL service
LESLIE CAULEY, USA TODAY
Cheaper high-speed Internet service is coming.
Within a few months, ATT is expected to start charging $19.95 a month
for naked DSL, meaning you don't have to buy any other ATT service,
including
Taxes, fees, and recovery surcharges are extra.
Modem is free.
Early term is extra.
They didn't mention if you had to have a Cingular account.
George Rogato wrote:
ATT is required to offer naked DSL for $19.95 in markets that are at
least 80 percent upgraded for broadband. That describes many
Blake Bowers wrote:
Actually, Walmart has made most of its money by providing the CONSUMER
with
what the CONSUMER wants.
Walmart fills only what the consumer wants. That is how they make
money,
by meeting those consumer needs/desires. When a customer wants
an apple for ten cents, you
Mark,
While it is true that many suppliers created their own problems, both
Walmart Home Depot do in fact beat up their suppliers. Extra fees.
Delivery hassles. Invoicing issues. It is a catch-22: everyone wants to
sell at Walmart to get at the eyeballs, but at what cost? Why do you
think
Actually, once they post on this public, archived listserv that they
will not file, it becomes a permanent record and their business becomes
everyone's business.
You want WISPA to be taken seriously? You don't post on the list and say
I ain't filing.
It reflects poorly.
You don't want to
They have made billions by serving billions of customers.
Walmart and McDonalds only work on scale -- huge scale.
Lexus and Bose are not mass market.
And neither are many of you on this list.
In the DSL arena, the combined 300 ISPs selling in BellSouth territory
in its hey-day never had more
Do any of you use caching to save on bandwidth consumption?
Blair Davis wrote:
The other point is, that with a good mix of residential and business
customers, and a little creative thinking, one can match their usage
patterns to minimize ones peak bandwidth requirements while still
Just so you know - Cingular is indeed a separate entity from BST and att.
Assets from one are not found by the other.
Heck, SBC assets can't be found by att.
Level3 can't identify Progress or Telcove lit buildings.
The bigger they get, the worse it gets.
But the opportunity to steal customers
John J. Thomas wrote:
But, the model will work if you bill by the bytes
If Joe is paying $40 per month for 6 Gig and gets throttled at 6 Gig, then he
has a disincentive for keeping going. If he is paying $40 for unlimited access,
he has no reason to slow down.
Charter cable is doing 10
wispa wrote:
The only time that makes sense, is when it pays to do it, that's why. So
why and how would someone profit from doing it. Answer that question, and
you'll answer why there are broadband problems in the US (if there really
is any) and it won't require a single confidentiality
John J. Thomas wrote:
But, the model will work if you bill by the bytes
If Joe is paying $40 per month for 6 Gig and gets throttled at 6 Gig, then he
has a disincentive for keeping going. If he is paying $40 for unlimited access,
he has no reason to slow down.
Charter cable is doing 10
This will get harder as 4Q07 approaches and ATT rolls out it's $10 DSL
and $19.95 Naked DSL - as per merger concessions. There will be a ton of
disqualifiers. However, this will effectively put many Residential ISPs
in the NFL cities out of business.
I don't understand the race to the
Most Americans regard the illegal downloading and distributing of
Hollywood movies as something on par with minor parking offenses,
according to a report issued Wednesday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070125/wr_nm/piract_dc_1
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We
They aren't saying 10MB for $10.
They are saying DSL for $10 -- most likely DSL Lite.
It will probably be felt my the dial-up providers like NetZero, since
the price is used to add subs.
New subs added is the metric that Wall St. is watching.
SBC learned that at $10 they can convert dial-up
accurate data,
and standing behind its word is protects the integrity of the FCC.
I do not believe that the FCC GOA has any benefit to fudge their
findings.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anybody using BelAir?
They have made some stabs at doing Muni RFP's but had some capital issues.
http://www.phoneplusmag.com/hotnews/71h17132810.html
BelAir Networks, a mobile broadband multiservice wireless mesh network
provider, today announced an expanded VAR channel program.
BelAir
You know that if they don't want to give up the raw data that they have
fudged the heck out of it!
It has been suggested by many folks, including Peter Huber, that it
might be time to put the FCC out to pasture.
- Peter
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
www.ipvisionsoftware.com for cameras and DVR software.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RickG wrote:
Anyone doing BPL? I'd like to know your experience.
What equipment did you use?
How did you manage it?
-RickG
Rick,
do you mean BPL inside buildings? Or BPL as a network broadband option
over power lines?
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs
It is too complex.
That was the Big Picture Idea from ISPCON when EarthLink announced its
Alliance program.
The problem is management of 700 different systems.
Most are not wi-fi, so there is CPE involved.
There are other issues.
- Peter
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Now for the next phase that
201 - 300 of 611 matches
Mail list logo